The thesis statement and the topic sentences in the body paragraphs A. must be the same. B. must be related. C. must be written at the same time.

In these lines, Shakespeare describes the end of the War of the Roses. He tells us that this war (a series of civil wars between the Houses of Lancaster and York, two branches of the Plantagenet) is over, and that the House of York has won. The speaker is Richard, who discusses his brother Edward IV's reign.

The speaker compares the reign of Lancaster and the war to the winter, and the reign of York to spring. In the line "the clouds that lour'd upon our house," the speaker implies that the clouds represent the winter, and the bad times they had just experienced. On the other hand, the word "loured" can be translated as "to frown upon," while "our house" most likely refers to the House of York.

Answer is C on plato/clever

Option C is- The structure focuses on an incident and its consequences.

The figurative language used in the sentence is called a simile. A simile is comparing one thing to another describing the to objects/terms as a like. You can tell is a sentence is a simile if the sentence has the words like or as when comparing to objects/terms. The sentence you stated has the word "like" ("...skinny and very short like a little sapling").

I believe the answer is D

Answer:

D) guilt

Explanation:

The reverend appears to be referring to the idea of guilt. In this text, we learn that the minister wears a black veil on his face. No one understands the reason for this. However, in this text, we learn that Reverend Clark assumes that his refusal to remove the veil must be an admittance of guilt to a horrible crime.

Peyton Farquhar's character in An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge is closely associated with both the Romantic and Realist literary movements. His idealistic nature and emotional depth embody the Romantic style, while his tragic fate reflects the Realist movement.

The character Peyton Farquhar in Ambrose Bierce's An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge is most closely associated with the Romantic and Realist literary movements. The Romantic movement is evident through Farquhar's idealistic view of the world and his longing for heroic action. His personality traits, such as his imaginative nature and the emotions that he experiences throughout the story, are typical of Romantic characters.

On the other hand, the Realist movement is reflected in Farquhar's fate. Despite his romantic fantasies of escaping death and returning to his family, the harsh reality is that he is hanged for his attempted sabotage - a purely realist perspective that contrasts sharply with his earlier romantic illusions.

https://brainly.com/question/33511915

#SPJ6

Peyton Farquhar from Ambrose Bierce's 'An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge' possesses traits closely aligned with the Romantic & Realism movements.

The character Peyton Farquhar, as described in Ambrose Bierce's An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge delineates traits that align closely with the Romantic and Realism literary movements. The Romantic movement of the late 18th to early 19th centuries emphasized emotions, beauty of nature and individual freedom, that are reflected in Farquhar's idealized perception of his circumstance and surroundings. The abrupt shift to the harsh reality of his impending execution hones more on the realism movement of the late 19th century, emphasizing the depiction of life as it is, without any form of embellishment or escapism.

https://brainly.com/question/29545504

#SPJ6

The body features of the hippopotamus are a deadly combination.

The introduction states that "Hippopotamuses are the most dangerous animals in Africa." Because the topic sentence says that they are dangerous, it would not make sense to repeat that idea as the topic sentence. The sentence about hippopotamuses being a vegetarian and it catching food easily does not seem to make much sense. Vegetarians do not usually need to catch their food, since plants don't run. Also this sentence does not show how hippopotamuses are dangerous. The last option is informal and would not be appropriate in any essay. The option about the body features being a deadly combination is correct because it connects the introduction to the more specific supporting details about the hippopotamuses jaws and teeth.

On the basis of supporting details that are provided, the topic sentence that is most likely to be read would be:

B). The body features of the hippopotamus are a deadly combination.

Thus, option B is the correct answer.

Learn more about 'supporting details' here:

brainly.com/question/1094741

The answer is C a Stone Monument

Final answer:

Deception involves purposely misleading experiment participants in order to maintain the integrity of the experiment, but not to the point where the deception could be considered harmful.

Explanation:

Deception involves purposely misleading experiment participants in order to maintain the integrity of the experiment, but not to the point where the deception could be considered harmful. For example, if we are interested in how our opinion of someone is affected by their attire, we might use deception in describing the experiment to prevent that knowledge from affecting participants' responses.

In cases where deception is involved, participants must receive a full debriefing upon conclusion of the study complete, honest information about the purpose of the experiment, how the data collected will be used, the reasons why deception was necessary, and information about how to obtain additional information about the study.

She wanted to show him his treatment plan  was wrong

I think your answer would be B.

Answer:

B

Explanation:

What is normal?

If you're always trying to be like everyone else or fit in then you will never be able to see or show people how great you are, just by being you.

The answer would be B. The dialogue indicates second-person point of view

Hope this helps :)

Mary Shelley wanted to write one type of ghost story that evoked the unspoken fears of humans.

In her introduction for her novel Frankenstein she stated  “I busied myself to think of a story, —a story to rival those which had excited us to this task. One which would speak to the mysterious fears of our nature, and awaken thrilling horror—one to make the reader dread to look round, to curdle the blood, and quicken the beatings of the heart.”

She aimed to write a story that frightened readers so much they would become suspicious of their surroundings.

According to the introduction, Mary Shelley wanted to write a type of ghost story that typically stimulate the unconveyed fright or terror of human beings in real life.

The significance of ghost stories is determined by the fact that they can also help ​​children experience courage, learn about different cultures, and expand their sense of community. Sharing ghost stories can even help children grow braver as they face their fears in a safe setting reading a book or listening to a ghost story.

According to the introduction to her novel Frankenstein, she conveyed “I busied myself to think of a story. She clearly determines the existence of fear in humans in order to stimulate encouragement. This would speak to the mysterious fears of our nature. She significantly targeted to frame a story that frightened readers so much they would become suspicious of the conditions of their surroundings.

Therefore, according to the introduction, Mary Shelley wanted to write a type of ghost story that typically stimulate the unconveyed fright or terror of human beings in real life.

To learn more about Ghost stories, refer to the link:

https://brainly.com/question/26829445

#SPJ5

It depends on what kind. sibling love is when 2 or more siblings have a strong bond with each other. It really is the same with parents. Romance love, now that's hard I guess it emerges when people go out with each other. Best friends can become a boyfriend or girlfriend relationship. The only way to succeed in love is when you actually love the person you love because of her characteristics, not her looks or fame. People may be mean at first but it's most likely something happened to them. Then there's lust. Lust is when 2 people want each other but don't love each other.True love is only when you and your love been thru a lot with each other and are still together.

Love emerges through a combination of intimacy, passion, and commitment, as described by Robert Sternberg's theory. Success in love involves nurturing these three aspects, but it can also be highly subjective and dependent on one's feelings, experiences, and cultural norms.

Love, as described by Robert Sternberg's theory, emerges through a combination of three components: intimacy, passion, and commitment. Intimacy involves sharing personal details, thoughts, and emotions with someone, whereas passion refers to the physical, romantic attraction one feels for another. Lastly, commitment includes standing by the person under any circumstances, much like the 'in sickness and health' vow often heard in wedding ceremonies.

Success in love, according to this model, would involve nurturing each of these three components: Maintaining open and honest communication to foster intimacy, keeping the flame of passion alive, and showing unwavering commitment. Love can also be regarded metaphorically as a sweet journey or a combat, highlighting its multi-faceted and dynamic nature.

It's important to note that love is a complex emotion and can differ greatly with personal perspectives, experiences, and cultural norms. A successful love relationship may look different from individual to individual.

https://brainly.com/question/32375541

#SPJ11

The answer is Randy and we went out to eat last night. My trick is to take each choice and see if it can stand alone by itself with the main part of the sentence.

Us went out to eat last night. (Does not make sense)

We went out to eat last night. (This makes much more sense)

The answer is Randy and we went out to eat last night.

The correct sentence: "Randy and we went out to eat last night."

The correct word to use in this sentence is "we." When referring to a group as the subject of a sentence, the subjective pronoun "we" is appropriate. In this case, "Randy and we" together form the subject of the sentence.

The pronoun "us" is used as the object of a verb or preposition, not when it functions as the subject. By using "we," the sentence maintains grammatical accuracy. It is important to choose the appropriate pronoun based on its role in the sentence, ensuring that it agrees with the subject it represents. Using "we" in this sentence indicates that Randy and the speaker (who is part of a group) went out to eat together.

To know more about sentence, click here.

https://brainly.com/question/34034441

#SPJ2

------------The given question is incomplete, the complete question is:

"In the sentence choose the correct word is:

-"Randy and we/us went out to eat last night?"------------

In the play 'Antigone', the question of whether it is okay to break the law is explored through the character's actions and philosophical discussions on morality.

In the play Antigone, the question of whether it is okay to break the law is explored through the actions of the main character, Antigone. She chooses to bury her brother, Polyneices, in defiance of the king's decree. While many argue that it is never okay to break the law, Antigone believes that there are higher laws that should be followed, which she refers to as the 'immutable unwritten laws of Heaven.'

This moral dilemma is also explored in other philosophical works. For example, Confucius emphasizes the importance of filial piety, or honoring and respecting one's parents, while Plato's Euthyphro dialogue questions the nature of piety and the ethical obligations in prosecuting a family member.

The question of whether it is okay to break the law is a complex one, as it requires considering conflicting ethical obligations and different perspectives on morality. Ultimately, the answer can vary depending on the specific circumstances and one's personal beliefs.

Well, this is a pretty vague question because it will all depend on which personality Trey has, what are his possibilities, etc. But I can help you try to make some kind of list that would help everyone if having the chance to follow it.

The first thing Trey has to do is to be sure what he likes doing, see what he enjoys in order to realize what he wants to do in his future.

After making this big decision, he has to study to be good at what he wants to do. If we are doing something, we better do it right. It is important to do it seriously to succeed. If we don't love or feel passionate about what we decided to do, we won't succeed at it.

And the last thing he should do is be patient and work hard to achieve the future he imagined. All good results are consequence of hard work, responsibility and good intentions.

Answer:

A: make goals → develop a personal vision → prioritize

Explanation:

A great research question on animal intelligence could be:  How do different environmental enrichment strategies affect the cognitive development and problem-solving abilities of captive primates?

To formulate a compelling research question in the field of animal intelligence, it is important to focus on specific, measurable, and novel aspects of animal cognition. The proposed question aims to explore the impact of environmental factors on the intellectual capabilities of primates, which are known for their complex cognitive processes.

Investigating the effects of environmental enrichment, which could include varied social interactions, puzzles, foraging tasks, or sensory stimuli, allows for the examination of how external factors can influence cognitive development. This question also opens up the possibility of comparing different enrichment strategies to determine which are most effective in enhancing problem-solving abilities.

The rationale behind choosing primates for this research is their close evolutionary relationship to humans, making them particularly relevant for understanding the roots of human intelligence. Additionally, studying primates in captivity provides a controlled environment that can help isolate the effects of specific enrichment strategies on cognitive abilities.

To address this question, researchers could design a series of experiments where captive primates are exposed to different environmental enrichment programs. The primates' problem-solving skills could be assessed through a variety of tasks, such as finding food in complex puzzles or learning to use tools. The results could provide valuable insights into how captive environments can be optimized to promote cognitive health and well-being in primates, with potential implications for conservation efforts and the management of zoo animals. Furthermore, the findings could contribute to the broader understanding of the factors influencing intelligence across species, including humans.

Answer:

I thought the poem "O Captain! My Captain!" was more effective at honoring someone involved in the war. Whitman begins by appealing to emotions by describing all the excitement after winning the war. But then he shows the sad emotions connected to Lincoln's death. The poem lets Whitman use emotion creatively. Even though the soldiers were brave and deserve to be honored, Lincoln really helped end the war.

Explanation:

dat the sample response

Answer:

I thought the poem "O Captain! My Captain!" was more effective at honoring someone involved in the war. Whitman begins by appealing to emotions by describing all the excitement after winning the war. But then he shows the sad emotions connected to Lincoln's death. The poem lets Whitman use emotion creatively. Even though the soldiers were brave and deserve to be honored, Lincoln really helped end the war.

Explanation:

Answer: Believing in the power of God's to save us from eternal destruction.

Puritan sermons often focused on the power of God to save humans from eternal destruction. The sermons emphasized the importance of believing in this saving power. The sermon "Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God" by Jonathan Edwards, is a good example of this. This sermon argues that following doctrines is not the way to achieve salvation. The only way to reach it is to put oneself on the hands of God, and to believe in his power to grant us eternal salvation.

Before the Great Awakening, most of the religious Americans believed they were predestined by God for Hell or Heaven. Therefore, they cared less about what their acts towards God may bring when they die. However, promoters of the Great Awakening did not agree and believed if every individual loves God and accepts his love, they could save themselves from the cruel suffering.

Jonathan, through his sermon, wanted to persuade people to believe and love God, as well as accept the love that God returns, so as to stay away from Hell. He warns individuals about the dangers in Hell and says- to improve their chances of going to Heaven, they must devote their true believes towards God and his mercy.

Deppends on the way he is using it like he could use the setting of wwii and the storys tension be really violent.

The author can put the main character at a dangerous place. To cause tension.

Hope this helps....

Name of the book, article, website, or other resource, author of resource, info about the journal it came from, publish date, and when it was accessed.

Hello there!

When we are writing an assignment, we sometimes took some information from a book or the internet to support our point of view about the topic. So when you do citation, you are telling the reader that this sentence isn't my own but it supports my idea.

What information should be in a citation?

Well, I would say: The name of the book and the pages so that it is easier for the teacher to double check if it's right.

2) The name of the article. If you have a sentence from an article, you need to put that in your citation. It is a way to show that you are giving the credit to the right person.

3) You also wanna put the date on there and the year it was published.

4) Make sure you put the author

I hope this helps!

Douglass’s speech proclaims that the treatment of African Americans directly contradicts the Declaration of Independence.

c on edge....

In "What to the Slave is the Fourth of July?" Douglass contradicts the Declaration of Independence. He tells us that the declaration states that the United States is a free country, and this is what people celebrate on the Fourth of July. He also tells us that the declaration states that all men are born equal in the country, and that they have the same rights and privileges. However, he states that all of this is false when you look at the existence of slavery in the country, and how enslaved people have no rights and no privileges.

The order is: exposition, rising action, climax, falling action, and denouement.

we cant help u put stuff in a box

Pretty sure its nomative

Question 5 :Autumn

Question 6:Concord, Massachusetts

Question 7:weakness of nature

Question 8:all of the above

Question 9:the appreciation and importance of nature is a universal theme

Question 10: "On Walden Pond" tells a story and the State Parks article is informational

these are all correct btw :))

Answer:

Autumn

Concord, Massachusetts

Weakness of nature

All of the above

The appreciation and importance of nature is a universal theme.

"On Walden Pond" tells a story and the State Parks article is informational.

Explanation:

"On Walden Pond" is a book by transcendentalist author Henry David Thoreau. In this book, Thoreau describes his experience living in nature. The author spent two years living in a cabin in the woods, and in his book, he shares his reflections about life, spiritual learning and self-reliance. The text "State Parks" shares a topic with the book, as both of them demonstrate that the appreciation and importance of nature is a universal theme.

The Answer is (A) She evinced an interest in drama...

Ponyboy's statement reflects his struggle with self-deception and an awareness that his lies do not change his deeper understanding of truth. This internal conflict portrays the challenge between maintaining self-image and facing reality.

When Ponyboy says, “I lie to myself all the time. But I never believe me,” he's acknowledging his own attempts at self-deception. He tries to convince himself of certain ideas or perspectives, likely about his circumstances or his own actions, that he knows are not truly honest reflections of reality. However, his deeper consciousness does not support these fabrications, and as a result, he doesn't genuinely convince himself.

This concept also touches on the nature of truth and deception. Just as the boy in the literature who states he never lies, and a character snapping at someone for wanting to take a detrimental action, this highlights the moral compass and internal struggles characters face between right and wrong, perception and reality. Ponyboy's statement reflects a universal human experience: wrestling with inner truths versus the lies we tell ourselves to cope with difficult experiences or to preserve a certain self-image.

It is impossible for someone to lie unless he thinks he knows the truth, which circles back to Ponyboy's conflict. He can't fully lie to himself because deep down, he knows the truth of his situation. This inner conflict is what makes him a compelling and relatable character.