Answer:
Comparison, connection, and change.
Explanation:
The basis of these terms is that the events which have occurred in history are linked together by them.
The three Cs of studying world history are Change, Continuity, and Context.
To understand world history effectively, it is important to focus on these three aspects:
1. Change: This refers to the transformations that have occurred over time in societies, cultures, economies, political structures, and technology. Recognizing and analysing these changes helps us understand how the world has evolved.
2. Continuity: While change is significant, it is equally important to identify what has remained consistent over time. Continuity can be seen in traditions, social structures, and patterns of behaviour that persist despite other changes.
3. Context: Everything in history happens within a particular context, which includes the specific time, place, and circumstances. Understanding the context of historical events allows us to interpret their causes and consequences more accurately.
By examining these three Cs, students of world history can develop a more nuanced and comprehensive understanding of the past and its impact on the present.
What was the effect of the Watergate scandal on the 1972 election
Answer:
President Richard Nixon defeated Democratic Senator George McGovern of South Dakota.
Explanation:
The effect of the Watergate scandal can be seen by the resignation of President Nixon this happened the first time in the history of America, even congress pass the new laws to limit the presidential powers.
later, Nixon claimed he was treated in a wrong way on the Watergate scandal he was doing for the sake of the country, his statements helped him in winning the 1972 presidential elections.
Which of the Axis nations did the Joint Chiefs of Staff believe should be the primary target of the Allied war effort?
Answer:
Explanation:
According to all the movies made on the subject including documentaries, the war in the Pacific had less attention paid to it than the European (read German) theater.
And yet for America, the fighting in the Pacific was probably much more brutal and primitive than Europe.
But that can't stated categorically. Europe was mainly a conflict between the Soviet Union and Germany. Some of the worst battles (for both sides) were fought on Russian Soil. You could look up Stalingrad, Leningrad and Kursk. These three battles were among the bloodiest (if not the bloodiest) in all recorded history.
So I guess it depends on which historian you ask.
You likely will do all right if you answer Germany, but it was not nearly that simple.
To make sure that your ideas are accurate, you should:
A. research the topic.
B. rely on the opinions of others.
c. talk to a teacher.
D. ask a friend for advice.
Answer
hi !
to make sure your ideas are accurate, you should
A- research the topic
☺☺☺
Under which jurisdiction would further review of a federal court decision fall under?
Federal court decisions are subject to further review under the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court for cases on appeal from lower federal or state courts.
Federal courts have jurisdiction over cases involving federal questions (issues arising under federal laws, treaties, and Constitution) and specific parties like the U.S. government and citizens of different states. Further review of a federal court decision would fall under appellate jurisdiction, where cases on appeal from lower federal or state courts are reviewed by the Supreme Court.
State judges must apply federal law over state law in case of conflict. Appeals from a state's highest court concerning federal questions go to the U.S. Supreme Court. Habeas corpus petitions alleging federal constitutional right violations may be reviewed by U.S. District Courts.
What was an effect of the US increase in production during World War II?
O It gave the Allies the advantage to win the war.
It gave the Axis the advantage to win the war.
It kept US factories busy throughout the world.
It kept only US soldiers well equipped.
Answer:
IT GAVE THE ALLIES THE ADVANTAGE TO WIN THE WAR!!!
Explanation:
HOPE THIS HELPS ;))
Answer:
The correct answer is: it gave the Allies the advantage to win the war.
Explanation:
Before Americans joined the war against the Axis powers (Germany, Italy, Japan, Hungary, Romania and Bulgaria), they produced large amounts of weapons and war materials for the Allied powers. But when they joined the war, they had to increase their production of war equipment to supply their own soldiers. President Franklin D. Roosevelt knew they had to increase their production in order to win the war. The War Production Board was created in 1942 to help manufacture these war supplies and weapons. So, the increase in production kept not only US soldiers well equipped, but the Allied soldiers as well. This definitely gave them the advantage to win the war.
List the following events in the correct chronological order.
1
The Boston Massacre occurred.
1, The Townshend Acts were passed.
T
The proclamation line was set.
The chronological order would be:-
The proclamation line was set in 1763
Then the Townsend Acts were passed in 1767
And at last the Boston Massacre took place in 1770.
What was Boston Massacre ?The Boston Massacre was a street fight that occurred on March 5, 1770, between a "patriot" mob, throwing snowballs, stones, and sticks, and a squad of British soldiers. Several colonists were killed and this led to a campaign by speech-writers to rouse the ire of the citizenry. A series of global events led to a local tragedy in Boston in 1770. Bostonian's reacted to Parliament's Stamp Act and Townsend Acts with anger, rage and sometimes with violence. Bostonian's rioted, destroyed property and intimidated appointed tax collectors.
Therefore, three, two and one would be correct chronological order .
To learn more about Boston Massacre,refer here :
https://brainly.com/question/3082933
#SPJ2
Who were Crazy Horse, Geronimo, and Sitting Bull?
O
A. American Indian leaders of the movement to settle on new lands
O
B. African American teachers who established schools
O
C. White farmers who became rich
O
D. American Indian leaders who fought against the U.S. Army
The correct answer is option D. Crazy Horse, Geronimo, and Sitting Bull were American Indian leaders who fought against the U.S. Army.
Who were Crazy Horse, Geronimo, and Sitting Bull?These three figures, Crazy Horse, Geronimo, and Sitting Bull, were Native American leaders who fought against the U.S. Army.Crazy Horse and Sitting Bull were chief leaders during the Battle of Little Bighorn at Sioux. Geronimo was renowned as an apache chief leader who led campaigns against the U.S. Army. These leaders were known for their courage and will to resist American and Mexican settler-colonial forces and army.
To conclude, Crazy Horse, Geronimo, and Sitting Bull were American Indian leaders who fought against the U.S. Army.
Learn more about these important Native American leaders here: https://brainly.com/question/26772060
#SPJ2
The correct answer is D. Crazy Horse, Geronimo, and Sitting Bull were American Indian leaders who fought against the U.S. Army.
Crazy Horse, Geronimo, and Sitting Bull were prominent leaders of various American Indian tribes who resisted the encroachment of the United States on their territories during the 19th century. They are well-known for their roles in leading their people in battles and negotiations with the U.S. government and the U.S. Army.
Crazy Horse was a Lakota warrior who played a key role in the defeat of General George Armstrong Custer at the Battle of the Little Bighorn in 1876. Sitting Bull was a Hunkpapa Lakota holy man and leader who also played a significant role in the same battle and was known for his leadership and vision in the fight to preserve his people's way of life. Geronimo was an Apache leader who fought against both Mexican and American military forces in the latter half of the 19th century, leading his people in resistance to their forced relocation from their ancestral homelands.
These leaders were not involved in settling on new lands, nor were they African American teachers or white farmers. Their legacy is that of resistance and struggle to maintain their cultural autonomy and rights to their traditional lands in the face of U.S. expansion.
early humans migrated to the Americans by crossing the __________.
HURRY!
Answer:
Early humans got to America by crossing the Land Bridge.
What does the Fifteenth Amendment to the Constitution say?
O
A. That voting rights can be taken away only if you don't pay federal
taxes
O
B. That states cannot limit the voting rights of individuals
O
c. That no individual may limit an individual's voting rights
O
D. That you cannot vote if you have ever been arrested
Answer:
Answer choice B
Explanation:
The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.
The correct option is B.
The Fifteenth Amendment to the Constitution says that states cannot limit the voting rights of individuals.
Fifteenth AmendmentFifteenth Amendment, amendment (1870) to the Constitution of the United States guaranteed that the right to vote could not be denied based on “race, color, or previous condition of servitude.” The amendment complemented and followed in the wake of the passage of the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments, which abolished slavery and guaranteed citizenship, respectively, to African Americans.
Learn more about Fifteenth Amendment here: https://brainly.in/question/17623919
#SPJ2
Why do we have checks and balances?
Answer:
Limit of power
Explanation:
This system of checks and balances gives each of the three branches of government ways to limit the powers of other branches. Ti make sure that the power stayed with the people. No part of the government should have too much power.
Final answer:
Checks and Balances are a core democratic principle of American government. Each branch of the government has some measure of influence over the other branches and may choose to block procedures of the other branches. The system was designed to provide a measure of protection against corruption and abuse of power.
Explanation:
Checks and Balances are a core democratic principle of American government. Each branch of the government (executive, judicial, and legislative) has some measure of influence over the other branches and may choose to block procedures of the other branches. The system of checks and balances was designed to create a political system where institutions and political organizations provided a measure of protection against corruption and abuse of power.
Which of the following is an example of a fiscal policy?
A. Banks raise interest rates.
B. The government cuts taxes.
c.A company lays off workers.
Anunion goes on strike.
SUBM
Answer:
B. the government cuts taxes.
Explanation:
Final answer:
An example of fiscal policy is when the government cuts taxes, which is intended to stimulate demand and economic growth, especially during a recession.
Explanation:
Among the options given, B. The government cuts taxes is an example of fiscal policy. Fiscal policy refers to the government's use of taxation and spending decisions to influence the economy. Specifically, when a government lowers taxes, it aims to increase the disposable income of individuals and businesses, stimulating demand and potentially leading to economic growth. This is considered expansionary fiscal policy, particularly useful during a recession to help stimulate output and decrease unemployment. On the other hand, contractionary fiscal policy, such as raising taxes or cutting spending, can be used to cool down an overheated economy and control inflation.
Fiscal policy, being a crucial tool for economic management, often involves debates over its effectiveness and impacts, including potential trade-offs like government debt accumulation. Key economic concepts related to fiscal policy include crowding out, crowding in, and the balance between economic stimulus and budgetary prudence.
In the mid-1800s, Northerners used the term slave power to criticize what
they believed to be the excessive political influence of which group of people?
O
A. Foreign slave traders
O
B. Freed slaves
O
C. Southern slave owners
D. Antislavery activists
Answer:
A. Foreign slave traders
Explanation:
how did imperialism affect europe
The imperialism had a massive effect on Europe, especially its western part. The countries that were imperial powers managed to get hold onto territories all over the world. By managing to control these territories, the imperialists had lot of natural resources and very cheap labor force at disposal. This enabled the industry in Europe to have constant growth, and the manufacturing to skyrocket, thus there were more and more products for the market, and more and more wealth was coming because of it, resulting in strong and well developed countries in Western Europe.
Which role does the judicial branch play in making public policy?
A. Determining whether a newly adopted tax law is legal
B. Presenting an argument to the public for increasing the minimum wage
C. Writing new regulations to enforce a change to environmental law
D. Adopting textbooks for a state according to curriculum changes
Answer:
A. determining whether newly adopted tax law is legal.
Answer:
A. Determining whether a newly adopted tax law is legal.
Explanation:
The Judicial Branch ensures that the new policy passed does not break any existing rights given to all citizens of the US, and that it does not limit any rights of any citizens based on ethnicity, race, religion, etc.
~
Why were attempts at railroad regulation often unsuccessful?
Attempts at railroad regulation were often unsuccessful due to political influence, economic considerations, and legal challenges.
Explanation:Attempts at railroad regulation were often unsuccessful due to several factors:
Political influence: Powerful railroad corporations exerted significant influence over government officials, making it difficult to pass effective regulations.Economic considerations: The railroad industry played a crucial role in economic development, and regulations could hinder growth and profitability.Legal challenges: Railroad companies often challenged regulations in court, leading to delays or overturning of regulations.Overall, the combination of political, economic, and legal obstacles made it challenging to successfully regulate the railroad industry.
Learn more about railroad regulation here:
https://brainly.com/question/34702762
#SPJ6
during the 1920s the field of psychology saw women as
Answer: establish themselves more easily than in many other areas in medicine.
Explanation: quizlet
Why did economic specialization become common in civilizations?
Final answer:
Economic specialization became common in civilizations because it allowed for a more efficient production of a greater variety of goods and services, fostered trade, and improved living standards through economies of scale.
Explanation:
Economic specialization became common in civilizations because it allows individuals and regions to focus on producing goods and services where they have a comparative advantage. This results in a more efficient use of resources and increases the total quantity of goods and services produced. Specialization led to the development of markets and trade, where people could exchange goods and services they specialize in for those produced by others. This system not only improved the quality of goods but also supported the growth of economies and societies. Furthermore, specialization contributes to economies of scale, meaning that as production increases, the cost of making each individual unit typically decreases, allowing for more affordable goods and a higher standard of living.
Examples of early civilizations that benefited from such specialization include farming communities that produced surplus food, which enabled cities to grow and artisans to thrive on craft production. The Roman Empire, with its skilled artisans and extensive market economy, is another testament to the efficiency and prosperity brought about by specialization and trade.
How did indios and mestizos participate in the Mexican War of
Independence?
O
A. By overthrowing Antonio López de Santa Anna's dictatorship
O
B. By supporting Spanish troops against Creole rebels
O
C. By joining with Creoles to support Agustín de Iturbide as emperor
D. By fighting with Miguel Hidalgo against Spanish and Creole troops
O
The Indios and Mestizos participated in the Mexican War of Independence by getting into a fight with Spanish and Creole troops.
Option D is the correct answer.
Who were Mestizos?Mestizos were a group of people that had a mixed culture of Spanish and Indian blend.
The Mexican War of Independence arose between the Mexican people and the government of Spain in the year 1810. It involved many groups like the Creole group or the Mexican-born Spanish people, the Mestizos group, and American Indians who wanted to get free from the rule of Spain.
Therefore, the engagement in the fight with Miguel Hidalgo against the Spanish and creole troops was one of the ways in which Indios and Mestizos participated in the war.
Learn more about the Mexican War of Independence in the related link:
https://brainly.com/question/8452036
#SPJ5
The song "For What It's Worth" shows conflict between:
Answer: the song "For What It's Worth" shows conflict between younger and older generations. It also shows the conflict between those who wanted America to go to war overseas and those who protested the action.
Explanation:
Hi !!
"For what it's worth" is a song which was written by Stephen Stills because of a clash between the police and young people from the hippy counterculture in California, in Los Angeles,Hollywood on the Sunset Strip in 1962.
Because the Sunset Trip had become a place where young people used to meet in clubs, the neighborhood began to protest.
A huge protest march was held on November 12th, 1962, clubs had to close.
People were arrested.
Afterwards this song became a protest song against the Vietnam War.
☺☺☺
Which principle states that laws apply to all people equally
Answer:
Principle of Isonomy
Explanation:
The principle of Isonomy states that "all independent individual be treated equally by the law and everyone is subject to the laws of justice" also known as due process.
laws are sets of rules which govern a community of people either in state or country and these rules can be enforced by the attachment of penalties to defaulters. According to the principle of Isonomy every individual is equal and same laws should apply to them as long as they are found in the areas been governed by same laws.
Immediately after World War I, how were conditions in Japan different from conditions in Germany?
Answer:
Japan was on the winning side in World War 1. They emerged a major power after the war and were enabled to gain more colonies. Germany on the other hand was on the losing side during World War 1. They lost land and had to pay great sums of money to the allies. They were also on the brink of starvation.
Explanation:
Ernest Hemingway often wrote works that focused on:
O
A. attacking the Lost Generation for undermining traditional values.
B. explaining the challenges faced by soldiers returning from war.
C. promoting radical artistic styles, including Dadaism and Cubism.
O
D. criticizing the materialism and shallowness of the Jazz Age.
Answer:
its B
Explanation:
Ernest Hemingway's writings often focus on the struggles faced by soldiers returning from war. His works did not heavily criticize the Jazz Age or promote Dadaism and Cubism. He forms part of the Lost Generation and his works display their disillusionment.
Explanation:Ernest Hemingway often explored the themes of war, love, loss, and personal experience in his works. However, of the options given, the most accurate would be Option B: explaining the challenges faced by soldiers returning from war. For example, one of his most famous works, A Farewell to Arms, is based on his own experiences from World War I and illustrates the difficulties a soldier faces when returning to civilian life.
His works do not heavily criticize the Jazz Age (Option D) or promote radical artistic styles like Dadaism and Cubism (Option C). As for Option A, Hemingway himself was part of the Lost Generation, and his works often portrayed the disillusionment of this group, rather than attacking them for undermining traditional values.
Learn more about Ernest Hemingway here:https://brainly.com/question/12736677
#SPJ2
What is the traditional interpretation of why the French Revolution started?
A.
Class conflict started the revolution.
B.
Enlightenment philosophies started the revolution.
C.
The French monarchy let the people eat only cake.
D.
The revolution started on Bastille Day in 1789.
Answer:
A. Class conflict started the revolutionExplanation:
The traditional interpretation of why the French Revolution started is due to political conflicts between the classes. Other reasons include an ineffective leader and economic struggles.
Answer:
B. Enlightenment philosophies started the revolution.
Explanation:
The ideas spread by that movement attacked the previous concepts of classes and bring the idea that every human was equal. It stood against the theological ideas about God, the clergy and the monarchy. It questioned their authority over the rest of the people, if every human was equal then the only ones able to rule them would be those who the people elected.
Those ideas hit hard in the masses that comprise the Third Estate and made them questioned about those who ruled them. That is why the enlightenment philosophies triggered the class conflicts and started the French Revolution.
I hope this answer helps you.
When developing your argument, why should you consider the opinions of
your audience?
A. To focus on topics that your audience doesn't find controversial
B. To explain a difficult and complicated topic to your audience
C. To understand what information will best persuade your audience
O
D. To choose only claims that your audience already accepts as fact
Answer:
The correct answer option is C. To understand what information will best persuade your audience.
Explanation:
When developing an argument, you need to consider the opinions of your audience as to understand what information will best persuade them.
Giving a thought to what your audience has to say will strengthen your persuasion skills and also you will get to know the direction your audience is going towards.
Once you get along with their point of view,it will help you convince them in a better way.
When developing your argument, you should consider the opinions of your audience to understand what information will best persuade your audience.
ASAP
How did Paul Revere use the Boston Massacre?
A. As a training exercise for the colonial armed forces
B. As a way to make the colonists angry with the British
C. As an excuse to attack the British ships in Boston Harbor
D. As a reason to declare war on Great Britain
Paul Revere use the Boston Massacre as a way to make the colonists angry with the British.
Who was Paul Revere?Paul Revere is best known as the Boston silversmith immortalized in the Henry Wadsworth Longfellow poem describing the Patriot's midnight ride to warn about a British attack.
He took part in the Boston Tea Party and was a principal rider for Boston's Committee of Safety. In that role, he devised a system of lanterns to warn the minutemen of a British invasion, setting up his famous ride on April 18, 1775.
What was the Boston Massacre?The Boston Massacre was a deadly riot that occurred on March 5, 1770, on King Street in Boston. It began as a street brawl between American colonists and a lone British soldier, but quickly escalated to a chaotic, bloody slaughter.
Paul Revere use the Boston Massacre as a way to make the colonists angry with the British. Paul Revere encouraged anti-British attitudes by etching a now-famous engraving depicting British soldiers callously murdering American colonists. It showed the British as the instigators though the colonists had started the fight.
Hence, option B is correct.
To learn more about the Paul Revere and the Boston Massacre here:
https://brainly.com/question/15388879
#SPJ2
What effect did the success of the American Revolution have internationally?
The American Revolution provided the blueprint for gaining independence.
The American Revolution caused other empires to better respect their colonies’ rights.
The American Revolution enabled other countries to weigh the pros and cons of revolution.
The American Revolution inspired other countries to declare independence.
Answer:
The American Revolution inspired other countries to declare independence.
Explanation:
Many other colonies that were under European rule soon followed suit and declared independence from their European rulers. For example, the country of Haiti declared independence from France, and was able to win it, as well as the country of Mexico being able to liberate themselves from Spanish rule.
~
Answer:
The American Revolution inspired other countries to declare independence.
Explanation:
The American Revolution inspired other countries to declare independence is the effect that the success of the American Revolution have internationally.
Bush says many countries have a stake in the Persian Gulf region. Why might this be the case?
Choices are,
A: Kuwait is an expansive country with a very large population.
B: The Persian Gulf is the center of the world’s fishing industry.
C: The world depends on oil produced by Gulf countries, such as Kuwait.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
This is because these countries along with kuwait have oil reserves but as oil prices are decreasing at rate due the invention of many electrical vehicle and other gadgets or what we call item which run on solar energy or what is called as the green energy. Secondly many gulf countries are losing it value, such Dubai selling patches of land for income, Saudi big tribe people having to small business where they should be owners of big companyand in kuwait they are sending the expats back to their homeland so the their citizen can work. All these gulf countries are in stake because after Dubai selling all it is land what will they do, they have income on tourism they do not have oil reserves; whole the country Kuwait has grown to it the level which is it is now by expats and if all the expats are sent back what will the the county do because a few Kuwaiti citizen work hard while others do at their own will since if a company has to work we need 13% of them.
Answer:
C: The world depends on oil produced by Gulf countries, such as Kuwait.
Explanation:
Why was it important for women to enter the workforce during the war
Answer:
The most reasonable answer is A :)
23. Which is not a form of cyber-bullying?
O intentionally excluding someone from an activity
threatening someone with harm
O making fun of someone
O asking someone out on a date
Final answer:
Asking someone out on a date is not a form of cyberbullying, provided it is done in a respectful manner and without any intention to harm or harass the other person.
Explanation:
The question is asking which activity is not a form of cyberbullying. Cyberbullying involves repeated behavior intended to cause psychological or emotional harm through electronic technology. Examples of cyberbullying include sending mean text messages, posting negative comments on social media, and sharing embarrassing photos or videos without consent, which are intended to intimidate, upset, or ridicule someone else.
Among the options provided:
Intentionally excluding someone from an activity can be a form of social bullying if it's done online repeatedly to cause harm.Threatening someone with harm is another example of cyberbullying.Making fun of someone online is also a typical cyberbullying behavior.Asking someone out on a date, assuming it is done respectfully and not as part of a pattern of harassment, is not an example of cyberbullying.Therefore, the behavior that is not considered cyberbullying is asking someone out on a date in a respectful manner.
Who led the battle of put-in-Bay?
Answer:
Oliver Hazard Perry
Explanation:
The Battle of Lake Erie was a pivotal naval engagement between British and American forces. The United States sent Oliver Hazard Perry to command the American forces on Lake Erie. Which he then led the force to victory.
Hope this helps!Oliver Hazard Perry led the Battle of Put-in-Bay on September 10, 1813, securing control of Lake Erie for the United States.
His victory against British forces was crucial in the War of 1812. This success disrupted British supply routes and aided American war efforts.
The Battle of Put-in-Bay, also known as the Battle of Lake Erie, was led by Oliver Hazard Perry for the United States on September 10, 1813. This battle, which took place during the War of 1813 on Lake Erie, was a pivotal naval engagement against the British forces commanded by Robert Heriot Barclay. Perry's victory was significant as it secured control of Lake Erie for the Americans and cut off British supply lines to the West, greatly contributing to the American efforts in the war.