These statements illustrate a difference in opinion between the two presidents over : b. expanding the federal government's role in the economy .
Explanation:
It is clear that there is difference in opinion between Herbert Hoover and Franklin D. Roosevelt. Both the presidents have different thoughts in expanding the federal government’s role in economy.
It is evident from the statement of the president Herbert Hoover that he supports rugged individualism. Rugged individualism encourages independent from state or government. Hoover thought that one’s effort only can make them succeed during the period of Great Depression. He also understood that it is responsibility of the government to improve the economy.
Final answer:
The differences in opinion between the two presidential candidates on government regulation of business pertain to one calling for tighter regulation due to corporate malpractices, while the other advocates for reduced regulation to support job creation and tax revenue generation.
Explanation:
The question appears to be discussing the differences in opinion between two presidential candidates regarding government regulation of business. This topic falls under the broad category of Social Studies, specifically within the realms of political science and economics. The student seems to be focused on understanding how different regulation policies advocated by political leaders may impact big business, the economy, and individual jobs.
Differences in Presidential Opinions on Government Regulation
One presidential candidate is advocating for tighter regulation of corporations due to concerns over fraud, pollution, and layoffs, reflecting a more interventionist or regulatory approach. On the other hand, the opposing presidential candidate favors reduced government regulation, emphasizing the role of businesses as significant contributors to job creation and tax revenue, aligning with a more laissez-faire or free-market stance.
Policies affecting regulation include adjusting corporate taxes, altering anti-trust laws, encouraging corporate behaviors through incentives like stock options, and managing trade agreements. Notably, past administrations have pursued various strategies such as Reagan's tax cuts, believed to have supply-side effects, and deregulation policies that affected several industries.
do you agree or disagree that human nature requires that we build safeguards into our government to protect us from our leaders? Explained
The three natural rights are safeguarded by laws that are created by the government. A government may be overthrown if it does not adequately safeguard these rights. We agree that human nature requires that we build safeguards into our government to protect us from our leaders.
Why are natural rights so important?Given that it lays the groundwork for independence and liberty, the idea of natural rights is crucial. Man is believed to be free and to possess natural rights from the moment of his birth.
Natural rights are those that are granted to all people merely for the reason that they are human. They are universal moral truths that apply to all countries and cultures and cannot be overturned by governmental regulations. Because of this, natural rights are frequently referred to as inalienable rights, or rights that cannot be violated.
Learn more about Natural Rights here:
https://brainly.com/question/20887193
#SPJ2
The last Roman emperor who was able to unite the empire was
Diocletian
Constantine
Severus
Caesar Augustus
Answer:
Constantine
Explanation:
Answer:
Constantine
Explanation:
Research about the cause and effect of the passage 19th amendment to the US constitution and explain to your reader why it is important to celebrate the 100th anniversary of women surface.
do it 2 or 3 pages.
90 pointss
Answer:
The 19th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution granted American women the right to vote, a right known as women's suffrage, and was ratified on August 18, 1920, ending almost a century of protest. ... Anthony and other activists, raised public awareness and lobbied the government to grant voting rights to women.
Explanation:
The Second Amendment (Amendment II) to the United States Constitution protects the individual right to keep and bear arms.It was ratified on December 15, 1791 as part of the Bill of Rights.
In District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), the Supreme Court affirmed for the first time that the right belongs to individuals, for self-defense in the home,while also including, as dicta, that the right is not unlimited and does not preclude the existence of certain long-standing prohibitions such as those forbidding "the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill" or restrictions on "the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons."State and local governments are limited to the same extent as the federal government from infringing upon this right.
The Second Amendment was based partially on the right to keep and bear arms in English common law and was influenced by the English Bill of Rights of 1689. Sir William Blackstone described this right as an auxiliary right, supporting the natural rights of self-defense and resistance to oppression, and the civic duty to act in concert in defense of the state. Any labels of rights as auxiliary must be viewed in the context of the inherent purpose of a Bill of Rights, which is to empower a group with the ability to achieve a mutually desired outcome, and not to necessarily enumerate or rank the importance of rights. Thus all rights enumerated in a Constitution are thus auxiliary in the eyes of Sir William Blackstone because all rights are only as good as the extent they are exercised in fact.
While both James Monroe and John Adams supported the Constitution being ratified, its most influential framer was James Madison. In Federalist No. 46, Madison wrote how a federal army could be kept in check by state militias, "a standing army ... would be opposed [by] a militia." He argued that state militias "would be able to repel the danger" of a federal army, "It may well be doubted, whether a militia thus circumstanced could ever be conquered by such a proportion of regular troops." He contrasted the federal government of the United States to the European kingdoms, which he described as "afraid to trust the people with arms," and assured that "the existence of subordinate governments ... forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition".
By January 1788, Delaware, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Georgia and Connecticut ratified the Constitution without insisting upon amendments. Several amendments were proposed, but were not adopted at the time the Constitution was ratified. For example, the Pennsylvania convention debated fifteen amendments, one of which concerned the right of the people to be armed, another with the militia. The Massachusetts convention also ratified the Constitution with an attached list of proposed amendments. In the end, the ratification convention was so evenly divided between those for and against the Constitution that the federalists agreed to the Bill of Rights to assure ratification.
In United States v. Cruikshank (1876), the Supreme Court ruled that, "The right to bear arms is not granted by the Constitution; neither is it in any manner dependent upon that instrument for its existence. The Second Amendments [sic] means no more than that it shall not be infringed by Congress, and has no other effect than to restrict the powers of the National Government."
In United States v. Miller (1939), the Supreme Court ruled that the Second Amendment did not protect weapon types not having a "reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia."
In the twenty-first century, the amendment has been subjected to renewed academic inquiry and judicial interest. In Heller, the Supreme Court handed down a landmark decision that held the amendment protects an individual's right to keep a gun for self-defense. This was the first time the Court had ruled that the Second Amendment guarantees an individual's right to own a gun.
In McDonald v. Chicago (2010), the Court clarified that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment incorporated the Second Amendment against state and local governments. In Caetano v. Massachusetts (2016), the Supreme Court reiterated its earlier rulings that "the Second Amendment extends, prima facie, to all instruments that constitute bearable arms, even those that were not in existence at the time of the founding" and that its protection is not limited to "only those weapons useful in warfare."
The debate between various organizations regarding gun control and gun rights continues.
The 19th Amendment, ratified in 1920, granted women the right to vote in the US. It was driven by the hard-fought activism of women's rights activists, and its effect has been significant in propelling societal and political developments aimed at achieving gender equality. The celebration of its 100th anniversary acknowledges this profound impact and the continued struggle for full gender equality.
Explanation:The 19th Amendment to the US Constitution, ratified in 1920, granted women the right to vote. It marked a significant turning point in US history by effectively doubling the size of the electorate and paving the way for greater political and social developments related to gender equality.
The passage of the 19th Amendment was driven by the vigorous activism and advocacy of women's rights activists, such as Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton. They argued against the prevailing societal and political norms that restricted the rights and roles of women to the private domain. The cause of the amendment was a long-fought struggle for equal rights.
The effect of the passage of the 19th Amendment has been profound. It not only allowed women to participate in the political process, but also ignited changes in societal norms and behaviors, empowering women to thrive in previously male-dominated arenas.
Celebrating the 100th anniversary of the 19th Amendment is important because it reminds citizens of the advancements in democracy and equality that have been achieved, and the work that remains to ensure full gender equality. The celebrations reaffirm the value of the right to vote, reminding us of a time when this right was not extended to all citizens, and encouraging continued involvement in civic life.
Learn more about 19th Amendment here:https://brainly.com/question/34692551
#SPJ12
Who took control of France in a coup d'etat in 1799?
a. Marie Antoinette
b. Maximilien Robespierre
C. Thomas Edison
d. Napoleon Bonaparte
Please select the best answer from the choices provided
Answer:
D. Napoleon Bonaparte
People in the Middle Ages were members of one of these three classes:
A. serf, monarchy, clergy
B. noble, clergy, merchants
C. serf, noble, clergy
Answer:
i believe it is C
Explanation:
the merchants were not yet a class and the nobles were a class separate from the monarchs in a way all monarchs were nobles not all nobles were monarchs hope this helps.
. Applying How did Chinese silk production fit the definition
of a monopoly?
Answer:
Hey my name is gabe
U KiNdA CuTe NoT GoNnA LiE.......
U look younger than 15 so yea
Im 13 turning 14 feb 14 in 3 months
Did government regulation of leaded gasoline and outlaw of lead in paint have a positive impact on the public and environment?
Answer:
bryujhb
Explanation:
Which term is defined as the opening of the Constitution?
Answer:
The Preamble to the Constitution opens the document. It addresses the topics the writers planned to cover.
Which of the following is NOT true about the Watergate break-in?
A. Former CIA agents broke in to the Democratic Party's headquarters at Watergate.
B. A link between the CIA agents and the White House are reported by 2 journalists.
C. The Senate and the Attorney General decided not to investigate further.
D. Nixon proclaimed his innocence and said the issue involved National Security.
Explanation:
it is d Nixon proclaimed his innocence and said the issue involved National security.
Answer:
C.) The Senate and the Attorney General decided not to investigate further.
Explanation:
This statement is very far from true actually.
After the the break-in occurred, Congress immediately became skeptical after president Nixon was reported to have connections with the agents.
They even involved the Supreme court when Nixon refused to hand over tapes involved with the incident, proclaiming that his executive privilege allowed him to keep the tapes confidential. This is what created the U.S v. Nixon supreme court landmark case.
This case shows us the limitations of executive privilege.
4 things about liberators and survivors video
Answer:
After their liberation, most Holocaust survivors experienced survivor's guilt, which is the mental guilt having to do with the fact that some people survived the event and others did not. Essentially, the survivors felt guilty that they survived the Holocaust while so many other people didn't. This is common with traumatic events like the Holocaust as well as wars.
I hope this helps.
Come on babes this is UrGeNt
How did the Greensboro, North Carolina lunch counter sit-ins impact the Civil Rights movement in Louisiana?
They resulted in sit-ins being classified as felonies by the Louisiana state legislature.
They led to college students in Baton Rouge and New Orleans staging their own sit-ins.
They caused lunch counters in New Orleans and other cities to immediately desegregate.
They forced the governor to declare martial law to prevent similar incidents in Louisiana.
Answer:
the second one
Explanation:
They led to college students in Baton Rouge and New Orleans staging their own sit-ins. Thus, option 'B' is the correct option.
What was the Civil Rights movement in Louisiana?In order to demand equality, civil rights activists in New Orleans throughout the 1950s and 1960s employed peaceful methods, including sit-ins at lunch counters, boycotts of stores, marches, and other types of protests. Four young girls have successfully integrated into formerly all-white primary schools thanks to their efforts on November 1.
Louisiana wasn't in the vanguard of the Modern Civil Rights Movement until Baton Rouge's first bus boycott, New Orleans' Canal Street sit-ins, and a 105-mile march from Bogalusa to the State Capitol. On August 28, 1963, the March on Washington took place, which is perhaps one of the most well-known moments in the history of the civil rights movement. Leaders of the civil rights movement, including A. Philip Randolph and Bayard Rustin planned it and participated.
Learn more about the Civil Rights movement here:
https://brainly.com/question/10557348
#SPJ6
Explain the difference between a progressive tax and a regressive tax ... cite one example of each, and explain why the example fits into that category of tax.
Answer:
Regressive taxes are when higher income people pay a smaller percent of income than the lower income people (state and city sales taxes). Progressive taxes are when higher income people pay a greater percent of their income compared to lower income people (federal income taxes).
Explanation:
Regressive taxes, such as state and local sales taxes, are levied when those with higher incomes pay a smaller percentage of their income than those with lower incomes.
Thus, Progressive taxes (federal income taxes) are levied when those with higher incomes pay a larger percentage of their income than those with lower incomes.
Regressive taxes are those that take a bigger percentage of income from low-income people or households than they do from people or households with higher incomes. In other words, the tax burden rises disproportionately when income declines.
The tax rate falls as income rises in a regressive tax system. As a result, people with lower incomes pay a larger percentage of their income in taxes than people with higher incomes do.
Thus, Regressive taxes, such as state and local sales taxes, are levied when those with higher incomes pay a smaller percentage of their income than those with lower incomes.
Learn more about Progressive tax, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/30104586
#SPJ3
What country established ties with the Soviet Union?
Answer:
Europe in december 30 1922 and existed until December 26 1991.
An epidemic is defined as an outbreak of a contagious disease that spreads rapidly and widely. What is the difference between an epidemic and a pandemic, and how should the 1918-1919 Spanish flu be classified?
Answer:
A pandemic is an epidemic of disease that has spread across a large region, for instance multiple continents, or worldwide. A widespread endemic disease with a stable number of infected people is not a pandemic. Widespread endemic diseases with a stable number of infected people such as recurrences of seasonal flu are generally excluded as they occur simultaneously in large regions of the globe rather than being spread worldwide.
The Spanish flu, also known as the 1918 flu pandemic, was an unusually deadly influenza pandemic. Lasting from January 1918 to December 1920, it infected 500 million people – about a third of the world's population at the time. The death toll is estimated to have been anywhere from 17 million to 50 million, and possibly as high as 100 million, making it one of the deadliest pandemics in human history.
Explanation:
5. What is the smallest area where elections are held?
a state
a precinct
a city
a county
Answer:
precinct
Explanation:
Answer: A precinct
Explanation:
What 3 countries were part of the Axis powers?
Answer:
Germany, Italy, and Japan.
Explanation:
These countries were working together as allies. After signing the Tripartite Pact in 1940 they were officially called the Axis Powers.
Each Axis had a leader. In German you have, Adolf Hitler. In Italy you have, Benito Mussolini. Finally, you have Emperor Hirohito in Japan.
How did the Immigration Act of 1965 change U.S. immigration policy?
A.
Instead of being judged on their criminal records, people simply paid a fee to immigrate.
B.
Instead of filling government-enforced quotas, people were judged on their skills and education.
C.
Instead of passing a health exam, people were judged on merit and determination.
D.
Instead of passing a U.S. history exam, people were sponsored by family members who already lived here.
Now, instead of filling government-enforced quotas, people were judged on their skills and education as the U.S. immigration policy changed because of the Immigration Act of 1965.
How did the Immigration Act of 1965 changed the U.S. immigration policy?The Immigration Act of 1965 brought an end to the National Origins Formula, which was the basis of U.S. immigration policy. The act withdrew the discrimination faced against the Asians, Europeans and other groups of immigrants. It is also called Hart-Celler Act.
As the result, the qualified and skilled workers were encouraged to immigrate. The Immigration Act of 1965 changed U.S. immigration policy as because now, instead of filling government-enforced quotas, people were judged on their skills and education.
Therefore, option b is the way Immigration Act of 1965 change U.S. immigration policy.
Learn more about Immigration Act of 1965:
https://brainly.com/question/8056897
Which action by Caesar Augustus gave the Romans control over certain trade routes?
O the creation of the navy
the restoration of the Senate
the construction of the Pantheon
O the establishment of the mail service
Answer:the navy
Explanation:
Answer:
a the navy
Explanation:
edge 2020
Why did many Christians flee ancient Rome and move to Axum? to escape drought to avoid persecution to avoid Muslim invasions to escape the Black Death
Answer:
to avoid persecution
Explanation:
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Got A 100%
The Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 was the first federal act passed with the intent of outlawing monopolistic
business practices and prohibiting the establishment of
I think its something like enterprises
Answer:
Trusts
Explanation:
Roosevelt used the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 to attack the robber barons’ monopolies. This was the first act designed to outlaw monopolistic business practices. It also regulated the establishment of trusts. A trust is a commercial alliance between businesses. Roosevelt supported business trusts that benefited the public good, but thought trusts intended solely for profit violated the public interest.
What can differences in literacy rates indicate?
A) Countries with higher literacy rates usually have stronger militaries.
B) Countries with lower literacy rates usually lack of natural resources.
C) Countries with lower literacy rates usually have more stable governments.
D) Countries with higher literacy rates usually have a higher standard of living.
Which social policy issue did the No Child Left Behind Act address?
O
A. Unequal opportunity despite overall prosperity
O
B. Declining achievement in public schools
O
C. Widespread poverty due to the Great Depression
D. A costly and unfair health care system
Answer:
B. Declining achievement in public school.
My fellow Americans: As President and Commander in Chief, it is my duty to the American people to report that renewed hostile actions against United States ships on the high seas in the Gulf of Tonkin have today required me to order the military forces of the United States to take action in reply. . . . The determination of all Americans to carry out our full commitment to the people and to the government of South Vietnam will be redoubled by this outrage. Yet our response, for the present, will be limited and fitting. We Americans know, although others appear to forget, the risks of spreading conflict. We still seek no wider war.
—President Lyndon Johnson, Gulf of Tonkin speech, August 4, 1964.
Which of the following best describes the course of action that President Johnson wanted the United States to take when he gave this speech?
A.
to support South Vietnam with as many United States troops as needed to win
B.
to support South Vietnam with only United States air power
C.
to support South Vietnam with United States economic assistance
D.
to support South Vietnam with as little United States involvement as possible
Answer: a
Explanation:
In his Gulf of Tonkin speech, President Johnson initially indicated a limited military response to the incident, but the subsequent Gulf of Tonkin Resolution and resulting actions led to a large-scale involvement of American troops in the Vietnam War.
The speech by President Lyndon Johnson on August 4, 1964, in response to the Gulf of Tonkin incident, signaled his intention to escalate U.S. involvement in Vietnam. However, Johnson's statement that the response would be 'limited and fitting' indicates that his initial strategy wasn't to seek a full-scale war but a measured military response. Despite the initial restraint, the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution gave Johnson the authority to escalate military operations, which eventually led to a significant increase in American troops and resources committed to Vietnam.
It's important to note that subsequent actions saw substantial escalation beyond the initial 'limited' response, with bombing campaigns and the deployment of ground troops. Answer option "A: to support South Vietnam with as many United States troops as needed to win" best describes the eventual course of action that the United States took following Johnson's speech and the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, though this was not the immediate response communicated in the speech itself.
The Know-Nothings argued that immigration to the United States:
A. Created economic problems.
B. Brought disease
C. Increased crime.
D. All of the above.
d. All of the ABOVE :)
The civil rights movement inspired the women's movement by
A. making reproductive rights education more accessible.
B. drawing attention to group discrimination.
C. highlighting Martin Luther King Jr.'s calls for gender equality.
D. Offering models of non-violent protest.
Answer:
B. Drawing attention to group discrimination
PLEASE PLEASE HELP ME
1.) How would you recommend improving the executive branch of the federal government in the United States? Why?
2.) How would you recommend improving the legislative branch of the American federal government? Why?
Answer:
1: My recommendation to fix the executive branch would be to get rid of the Electoral College system as a whole and improve voting access. If we are going to recognize our country as a Democracy, then we should have the power to elect our president and it should be left to raw counting instead of constituents.co
2: My recommendation to improve the legislative branch of the government would be to make Congress as bipartisan as possible in order to achieve things. The fact that we were in a government shutdown is sad because of the fact that Congress couldn't agree on the budget and the fact that party divides cause social issues as well as economic.
Explanation:
There are many ways we can improve government. Some are complicated, some are difficult, and some are simple.
As we confront today’s increased social and political tensions, and as we continue to work toward a better government, three fundamental lessons for career and political leaders can help us build a better future. The people of this nation, and leaders in both the executive and the legislative branches of government, can work together to better government by embracing age-old truths and keeping civics lessons in mind.
Congress is the governing body of the United States. It is made up of two chambers: the Senate (Senate) and the House (House). Congress is held in session at the United States Capitol Building in Washington, D.C.
To learn more about the government, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/4160287
#SPJ2
how much power does each branch of the government hold?
a. they all have equal amounts of power
b. legislative 30%, executive %40, and judicial 30%
c. the executive branch only has more power than the legislative branch
The answer is A so none of the branches will have to much power.
In the United States government, the three branches—the legislative, executive, and judicial—hold different powers and responsibilities.
The division of power among the branches is outlined in the Constitution and is intended to establish a system of checks and balances.
a. They all have equal amounts of power: This statement is not accurate. The three branches of government do not have equal amounts of power. Each branch has distinct powers and functions.
b. Legislative 30%, executive 40%, and judicial 30%: The percentages provided in this statement are arbitrary and not representative of the actual power distribution among the branches.
The Constitution does not assign specific percentages of power to each branch.
Learn more about legislative here:
https://brainly.com/question/28855381
#SPJ6
Help help help HELP
What is a character trait to describe Grover in Percy Jackson
Answer:
I say Grover is righteous, truthful and/or brave because Grover overall a good, upstanding character consistently facing danger in order to protect his friends and complete his dream. He can identify what is right and what is wrong. He is also a guardian, a Satyr who brings new Half Bloods from danger to the Camp
A group that was part of the Free-Soil Party was made up of
anti-abolitionists.
Republicans.
O antislavery Whigs
Southern Democrats.
Republicans
Hope this helps you !!!!!
PS
Explanation : The Free Soil Party was a short-lived coalition political party in the United States active from 1848 to 1854, when it merged into the Republican Party. The party was largely focused on the single issue of opposing the expansion of slavery into the western territories of the United States.
Answer:
REPUBLICANS
Explanation:
Yes
Which of the following events happened in chronological order?
A.Richard Nixon was president, then Gerald R Ford, then Jimmy Carter, then Ronald Reagan.
B. Ronald Reagan was president, then Gerald R Ford, then Jimmy Carter, then Richard Nixon.
C.Gerald R Ford was president, then Ronald Reagan, then Jimmy Carter, then Richard Nixon.
D.Richard Nixon was president, then Ronald Reagan, then Gerald R Ford, then Jimmy Carter.