This act by the United States resulted in Japan attacking Pearl Harbor.

Invasion
Treaty with China
Oil embargo
Political sanctions

Question 1:

Korea's location has played a central role in their relationship with China thorughout history. China's proximity to the Korea meant that both cultures greatly influenced each other, and there was significant trade operating in this area. However, China has had a stable government and large population for much of its history, giving them a considerable advantage in military affairs. Also, the proximity of Japan to both countries represented a common threat that often motivated alliances.

During the Ming dynasty, interactions between the two countries were mostly peaceful and close, based on their shared Confucian values and their shared origin from Mongol rule.

Question 2:

Tokugawa Ieyasu was the founder and first shogun of the Tokugawa Shogunate of Japan. The shogunate ruled Japan from 1600 until the Meiji Restoration in 1868. Ieyasue obtained power in 1600 and remained in power until his death in 1616. When Tokugawa Ieyasu took power in 1600, about 20% of Japan was controlled by Tokugawa or related households.

Final answer:

Korea's proximity to Ming China put it under pressure to adhere to tribute demands due to its less powerful status. Tokugawa Ieyasu gained control over Japan in the early 1600s, but the exact percentage of control is not specified in the provided materials.

Explanation:

Korea's Geopolitical Susceptibility to Ming China :

Korea's geographic location, neighboring the powerful Ming dynasty, made it susceptible to Ming pressures, such as the imposition of tribute systems. Being a smaller nation sandwiched between China and Japan, Korea often found itself in a position where it had to acquiesce to the demands of more powerful neighbors to maintain its sovereignty and peace. The tributary system that Korea was part of not only demonstrated its subordinate relationship to China but also ensured a form of diplomatic relations and mutual benefits, albeit with Korea in a lesser position.

Tokugawa Control of Japan :

When Tokugawa Ieyasu took power in the early 1600s after the Battle of Sekigahara in 1600, he and his related households controlled a significant portion of Japan. However, the exact percentage of this control is not clearly stated in the provided materials. Nevertheless, the consolidation of power under the Tokugawa shogunate marked the beginning of a period of relative peace and national unification, which was in contrast to the previous era of continuous internal strife among various daimyos.

Answer:

to fight discrimination based on race and sex

Explanation:

:)

C. Military leaders staged a coup to create a fascist government.

The Spanish Civil War was between the Republicans and the Nationalists. The coup, supported by the military units, left Spain militarily and politically split. The Nationalists was supported by the Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy with soldiers, ammunition etc. The Republicans was backed by the Communist Soviet Union and leftist Mexico. The War lasted from 1936 to 1939.

The right is the: C. Military leaders staged a coup to create a fascist government.

The event of the Spanish Civil war was held in between the Republicans and also among the Nationalists. Nationalists were hugely supported by Nazi Germany all along with the Fascist from Italy along with soldiers.

B is your correct answer

Final answer:

Speculations about Aye being responsible for Tutankhamun's death primarily stem from Aye's sudden rise to power following Tutankhamun's untimely demise. While there is no definitive evidence proving Aye's guilt, the circumstances of his ascent to pharaoh after marrying the widowed Ankhesenamun amidst a time of religious and political turmoil have fueled these theories.

Explanation:

The question 'What evidence exists that makes Aye seem guilty for killing King Tutankhamun?' refers to the historical speculations surrounding the death of the young Egyptian pharaoh Tutankhamun. The suspicion towards Aye, who was Tutankhamun's advisor and became pharaoh after marrying the widowed Ankhesenamun, arises from the tumultuous period of transition that followed Tutankhamun's untimely death at the age of eighteen. While there is no concrete evidence that directly implicates Aye in the murder of Tutankhamun, this unsettled period in Egyptian history, the young age of Tutankhamun's death, and Aye's ascension to the throne shortly thereafter have contributed to the theory that Aye could have had a motive to facilitate his own rise to power.

Speculation about Ay's involvement in King Tutankhamun's death is based on his quick accession to power and marriage to the widow Ankhesenamun, but no concrete evidence has been found to conclusively name him as the murderer. Theories regarding King Tut's death vary widely with no definitive proof.

There are multiple theories surrounding the death of King Tutankhamun, including one that implicates his successor, Ay, in the young king's death. One piece of circumstantial evidence against Ay is his rapid accession to the throne; he married Tutankhamun's widow, Ankhesenamun, which allowed him to become pharaoh. Historical records indicate a return to traditional religious practices following Akhenaten's monotheistic reign, which was consolidated under Tutankhamun and furthered by Ay. There are also suggestions of an attempt to erase Akhenaten and his successors from history, a process that began under Smenkhkare and continued under Tutankhamun and Ay.

However, there is no definitive evidence that Ay was responsible for Tutankhamun's death. Theories include a chariot accident or a hippopotamus attack, and modern scientific analysis, such as the C-14 decay rate testing, has been focused on determining how long ago King Tutankhamun died rather than finding proof of murder. It is important to note that much speculation still surrounds the death of King Tutankhamun, and no concrete evidence has been found to conclusively name Ay or any other individual as his murderer.

The Justinian Code was important as it simplified and streamlined centuries of existing Roman laws and Justinian's own laws and into one system. Four sections made up the code, and these were the Codex Constitutionum, Digesta, Institutiones and the Novellae Constitutiones Post Codicem.

Justinian I was Emperor of the Roman Byzantine Empire from 527 to 565. The first code, which included only the Codex was completed in 529. The Digesta and Institutiones were added in 534.

In the effort to simplify the code of laws, Justinian appointed 10 men to research all known laws and ordinances in the history of the empire. The commission siphoned out any outdated laws or laws that contradicted each other, and the result was known as the Codex Constiutionum.

The Digesta was a collection of 50 books of jurists rulings over the centuries. Any rulings that didn't appear in these books were then unable to be cited by lawyers in any court tribunal. This collection was built upon the research of 16 lawyers. The Institutiones amounted to a textbook for law students.

Finally, the Novellae Constiutiones Post Codicem acted as a supplement to the code and included Justinian's own ordinances that he announced between 534 and 565. This collection was added to the code after the first revision of the code.The Justinian Code was important as it simplified and streamlined centuries of existing Roman laws and Justinian's own laws and into one system. Four sections made up the code, and these were the Codex Constitutionum, Digesta, Institutiones and the Novellae Constitutiones Post Codicem.

Here it goes:

People in authority have many additional rights, and if these are not controlled (which they are, but not always work) things can get bad. For example, corruption. Corruption is a dishonest act of people in power which most of the time involve the fraude of money. When those im power start "robbing" money, many things can happen such as: not being able to pay or reducing pensions, public services will worsen, etc.

Hope it helped,

BioTeacher101

Hello....

In four to five sentences, explain what some of the consequences might be if people in authority were not bound by certain rules governing their behavior.

Well, everyone can't be part of the authority. Some of the consequences may include being robbed in many occasions and being not able to pay back those losses. Another really big problem is corruption. People can turn really bad and destroy the United States.

Eli Whitney invented the cotton gin. His invention automated the seed separation process. His machine could generate up to fifty pounds of cleaned cotton daily, making cotton production profitable for the southern states. Whitney invented the Cotton Gin.

Answer:In 1794, U.S.-born inventor Eli Whitney (1765-1825) patented the cotton gin, a machine that revolutionized the production of cotton by greatly speeding up the process of removing seeds from cotton fiber. By the mid-19th century, cotton had become America's leading export.

Explanation:

google said so :)

Why were President Wilson’s Fourteen Points not incorporated in the Treaty of Versailles?

A. The Allied delegates wanted Germany to pay reparations for the war.

B. The Allied delegates wanted a provision to restore democracy in Russia.

C. The Allied delegates felt the Fourteen Points were too easy on Germany.

D. The Allied delegates felt the Fourteen Points would restrict their expansion goals.

The correct answer is D.

Answer:

D. The Allied delegates felt the Fourteen Points would restrict their expansion goals.

Explanation:

Woodrow Wilson points were considered by France and Italy but the British were unwilling to cooperate, keeping a large fleet overseas.

Since UK delegates met with the Allies and directly blamed Germany, explicitly stating as a notion to be included in the treaty of Versailles.

Germany's army was to be limited in size and prohibited an air force, but the winning Allies were to keep their large armies.

The 14 points by US delegation headed by Wilson were a peace offer to German and Austrian Empires, with honorable means in terms of equals.

The US did not ratify the Treaty noticing it favored the UK and the points were abandoned.

The "Irreconcilables" a group of Republicans opposed the Versailles Treaty since it had little to do with the initial US proposal for peace. The points were seen as to idealistic and ultimaltely were abandonned.

because average cots drops as production rises

The correct answer is: "Because it can decrease its production costs and the price charged for its products up to a point that is unreachable for other competitors".

A monopoly is a market structure where a single firm serves the whole demand of a specific good or service. It does not face competitors, therefore, such firm has absolute market power to decide the price charged for its products.

On the other hand, when a company enjoys economies of scale it means that it has reached a large enough productive capacity to be able to decrease its average production costs. Such firm can become a natural monopoly because, if its competitors do not reach economies of scale too, they will be expelled from the market as they cannot compete in prices with the monopolist.

Inductive reasoning is the opposite of deductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning makes broad generalizations from specific observations. Basically, there is data, then conclusions are drawn from the data. ... Even if all of the premises are true in a statement, inductive reasoning allows for the conclusion to be false.

Answer :  The correct answer is :  In deductive reasoning the conclusion is inferred from the premises. Induction can be justified or validated while induction is not. The deductions are analytical. In inductive reasoning, the truth of the premises does not guarantee the truth of the conclusion. Induction is synthetic.

Answer:

80

i5 times10 equals 50 plus 3 times 10 which equals 30 and 30 plus 50 equals 80

To find : Total Money, owned by Urmar

Given : 5 and 3 dimes in left & right pockets respectively ; a dime = 10 cents

So, total money of Urmar

= ( Total dimes ) x number of cents per dime

= ( 5 + 3 ) x 10

= 8 x 10

= 80 cents , or 8 dimes

Hence, Urmar has 80 cents , or 8 dimes

To learn more, refer https://brainly.com/question/12174267?referrer=searchResults

It started in the 1870's and it ended in the 1950's

Hoped This Helped

The answer is Into the 1930s

Answer:

Option C.

Explanation:

Delegates petitioned against the Stamp Act, is the right answer.

The Stamp Act Congress is also recognized as the Continental Congress of 1765. It was a conference of some of the colonies of Britain in North America. It was the first conference of chosen delegates from several of the American colonies to launch a unified demonstration against the new taxation system enforced by the British parliament. The British parliament with the introduction of the Stamp Act imposed taxes on papers including legal documents, calendars, playing cards and newspapers etc.

Answer:

c is the answer

Explanation:

none

Independence movement in Texas.

Answer:

They were expensive luxury items designed for the wealthy.

Explanation:

The asian goods were somthing that not all people could afford, because they had to be transported from Asia so carrying cheap objects wasn´t profitable so they started to export more and more expensive items that the merchants were able to sell to the wealthy people back in Europe, spices and fabrics were the most demanded asian goods and were signs of wealth in Europe.

Answer:

A. They were expensive luxury items designed for the wealthy.

Explanation:

I'm pretty sure it's prohibition.

Answer:

I have a similar question except it has four answer choices.

The answer choices I have are "Scopes trial", "revival of the Ku Klux Klan", "Fascism", and "Prohibition".

Out of my choices, I'm chosing Scopes, KKK, and Prohibition.

Sadly, it doesn't tell me what questions I got correct, it only shows me the over-all grade, so I can't tell you if that's correct.

Explanation:

Try "Prohibition", and "Scopes trial" :)

EDIT: I was correct, Prohibition and Scopes trial are the correct answers. Sorry for the blur

Final answer:

South Carolinians used human resources to gain prosperity mainly through the enslavement of Africans which provided a permanent labor force for cultivating labor-intensive crops.

Explanation:

The best statement that explains how South Carolinians used human resources to gain prosperity is that they relied heavily on enslaved Africans for labor. In the southern colonies, including South Carolina, there was great demand for labor to cultivate labor-intensive crops such as tobacco, rice, and indigo. The turn to slavery provided the needed permanent labor force, as initially, the number of indentured servants coming from Europe was insufficient. Slavery in the Carolinas took a firm hold due to the influence of settlers from Barbados, where slavery was already an established practice. By the end of the 1600s, a class of wealthy rice planters used enslaved labor for their prosperity. The legal basis for slavery was cemented in the early 1700s, drawing from the Barbados slave codes. Therefore, slaves were not just reserved for the largest plantations; they were a widespread source of labor that enabled the growth of the southern economy.

Answer:

Explanation:

Dust in the air do have harmful effect. The effects of theses dust storm are;

The Dust storm is due to a lot of  economic and agricultural factors, such as  federal land policies, changes in regional weather, farm economics etc.

Learn more from

https://brainly.com/question/9304045

The major effects of a dust storm include:

1. Air Quality Deterioration: Dust storms significantly reduce air quality by increasing the concentration of particulate matter in the atmosphere. This can lead to respiratory issues for humans and animals, aggravating conditions such as asthma and allergies.

2. Visibility Impairment: The high concentration of dust particles in the air can drastically reduce visibility, posing hazards for transportation, particularly air and road travel. This can lead to accidents and travel delays.

3. Soil Erosion and Agricultural Impact: Dust storms can strip away valuable topsoil, which is rich in nutrients and essential for agriculture. This soil erosion can reduce crop yields and threaten food security. It can also lead to the spread of plant diseases and pests.

4. Economic Consequences: The impacts on transportation, agriculture, and health can have significant economic consequences. Clean up costs, healthcare expenses, and lost productivity due to transportation delays and reduced agricultural output can strain local and regional economies.

5. Environmental Damage: Beyond the immediate effects on soil and air quality, dust storms can also have long-term environmental impacts. They can contribute to the silting of waterways, damage to sensitive ecosystems, and the alteration of local climates by affecting the reflectivity of the Earth's surface.

6. Human Health Risks: In addition to respiratory problems, exposure to the particulate matter carried by dust storms can lead to more serious health issues, including cardiovascular diseases. Vulnerable populations such as the elderly, children, and those with pre-existing health conditions are at higher risk.

7. Infrastructure Challenges: Dust storms can damage infrastructure by clogging filters and machinery, leading to maintenance issues and operational downtime for various industries. They can also disrupt power supply by affecting electrical transmission lines and solar energy generation.

ONE REASON: was that naepolation was getting old and sick , he was poisoned

TWO REASON : the army

The collapse of Napoleon's empire can largely be attributed to the catastrophic invasion of Russia, which severely weakened his forces, and the rise of nationalism across Europe, which spurred revolts and resistance.

There are many factors that contributed to the collapse of Napoleon's empire, but two significant reasons stand out: the disastrous invasion of Russia and the rise of nationalism across Europe.

The Invasion of Russia

In 1812, Napoleon embarked on a massive campaign to invade Russia, a decision that proved to be one of his greatest miscalculations. Despite assembling a massive army of 600,000 troops, the result was catastrophic. The Russian strategy of scorched earth, combined with the onset of a brutal winter, decimated Napoleon's forces. By the time they retreated, only about 100,000 soldiers survived. This disaster damaged Napoleon's reputation as a military genius and significantly weakened his army.

Nationalism and Revolts

Napoleon's empire, despite its initial successes, planted the seeds of its own demise through the spread of nationalist sentiments. Occupied territories experienced a taste of egalitarian social systems and legal reforms, which inadvertently fostered a sense of identity and unity among disparate groups. This growing nationalism spurred revolts and resistance across the empire, as people began to envision themselves not just as subjects of a vast empire but as members of distinct nations. The looting of occupied territories to enrich France further alienated these populations, contributing to the empire's instability.

B. Iron Metalworking

Confucianism was an achievement which led to the downfall of the Zhou.

Confucianism as a religion was founded by Master Kong. He did this to unveil the mystery behing the religion of the Zhou dynasty. This religion was the push factor for the better ideals, social values andphilisiphy of the Chinese society.

In the 1930s America went through a crime wave caused mostly by illegal traders of alcohol and gangsters. To control this increasing criminality wave, which included murder and armed robbery American government implemented twelve measures which made reforms in the procedures of the law enforcement agency.

Such reforms included, among others, making a federal offense to rob banks so criminals could not keep escaping prosecution by crossing state lines and giving agents of the Bureau of Investigation (or FBI) the authority to carry weapons as well as to make arrests.

Answer:

increase educational and ethical standards to improve the quality of law enforcement

Explanation:

i got it right

Castro shared good relations with US Cold War rival, the Soviet Union.

Castro declared that he would assassinate US president Dwight Eisenhower and destroy the US government.

Answer:

A and B

Explanation:

just took the test on plato

Answer:

America was Britain's enemy in the French and Indian War, but they were allies in the American Revolutionary War.

The French and Indian War was a struggle between the British and French with their respective Native American allies over territory in North America, where the American colonies were allied with Britain. The American Revolutionary War was a subsequent conflict where the American colonies fought for independence against Great Britain.

The French and Indian War and the American Revolutionary War were two distinct conflicts that occurred in different time periods in the 18th century. The French and Indian War, also known as the Seven Years' War, was principally a struggle for empire between the British and French, with each side supported by military units from home and by Native American allies. It began primarily as a contest for territory in North America, with battles predominantly fought in the region now known as Canada and along the frontier of New France and British America. The American colonies were Britain's allies during this war. On the other hand, the American Revolutionary War was a conflict between Great Britain and its Thirteen Colonies in North America which declared independence as the United States of America. After more than a decade of growing estrangement between the British crown and many North American colonists, the colonies declared their independence and fought for self-governance.

People choose where they live based on several factors including economic opportunities, social connections, environmental considerations, and personal preference. Job prospects, proximity to family and friends, climate and personal needs and wants can all influence someone's choice of living place.

There are several factors that determine why people live where they live today. The primary reasons include economic opportunities, social connections, environmental considerations, accessibility to amenities, culture, and personal preference.

Economic opportunities play a significant role in determining where people live. Cities and metropolitan areas, with their abundance of job opportunities, attract people seeking work. Conversely, regions with fewer economic opportunities tend to see an outmigration of residents.

Social connections can also influence where individuals choose to reside. People often live close to family or friends or in communities with shared cultural or ethnic identities.

Furthermore, environmental considerations, such as climate, scenery, and access to outdoor recreation can be a draw for some individuals. Lastly, personal preference, which can encompass a range of individual wants and needs, often leads people to choose where they live.

https://brainly.com/question/31597656

#SPJ11

I believe that the answer would be B. Hope this helps :)

The Arab Spring was a loosely related group of protests that ultimately resulted in regime changes in countries such as Tunisia, Egypt and Libya. Not all of the movements, however, could be deemed successful—at least if the end goal was increased democracy and cultural freedom. In fact, for many countries enveloped by the revolts of the Arab Spring, the period since has been hallmarked by increased instability and oppression. Given the significant impact of the Arab Spring throughout northern Africa and the Middle East, it’s easy to forget the series of large-scale political and social movements arguably began with a single act of defiance.

The Arab Spring began in December 2010 when Tunisian street vendor Mohammed Bouazizi set himself on fire to protest the arbitrary seizing of his vegetable stand by police over failure to obtain a permit. Bouazizi’s sacrificial act served as a catalyst for the so-called Jasmine Revolution in Tunisia. The street protests that ensued in Tunis, the country’s capital, eventually prompted authoritarian president Zine El Abidine Ben Ali to abdicate his position and flee to Saudi Arabia. He had ruled the country with an iron fist for more than 20 years.