Answer:
TRUE
Explanation:
Did President Andrew Jackson's tariff benefit the North or the South?
The tariffs enacted during Andrew Jackson's presidency benefitted the North by protecting their industries with high import taxes. The South opposed these tariffs as they increased the cost of imports and led to retaliatory tariffs on their exports. This disparity led to tensions and the Nullification Crisis, illustrating the sectional economic differences.
The student asked: Did President Andrew Jackson's tariff benefit the North or the South?
The tariffs enacted during Andrew Jackson's presidency, specifically the Tariff of 1828 and the Tariff of 1832, primarily benefitted the North. These tariffs were designed to protect Northern industries by imposing high import taxes on foreign goods, which encouraged the purchase of domestically produced goods. However, they were unpopular in the South because they made imported goods more expensive and prompted other nations to impose retaliatory tariffs on Southern exports like cotton.
The South viewed these tariffs as economically harmful since they increased costs and did not benefit their economy, which was more export-oriented. This led to significant tension and the Nullification Crisis, which South Carolina spearheaded in opposition to these tariffs. Although the Compromise Tariff of 1833 eventually reduced these rates, it was clear that the North had gained more favorable economic protection from these tariffs compared to the South.
Why did the United States decide to attempt the Doolittle Raid?
Answer: it demonstrated that the japanese mainland was vulnerable to american air attack, served as retaliation for the attack on pearl harbor, and provided an important boost to american morale.
Answer:
Japenese mainland was important (vunerable) to american air attack ,served as retaliation for the attack on Pearl Harbor and provided an important boost to american role.
Explanation:
Why did some members of European nations vote fascist regimes into power following WWI?
Answer:
Because they were in bad economic situations after the war and the fascists were filling them with pride and hope.
Which statement BEST describes this excerpt from the Wilfred Owen poem?
A) War is a glorious experience.
B) War is a horrible and futile event.
C) War is a tragic event but is sometimes unavoidable.
D) War is something that is best left for soldiers, not poets.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
War is a glourious experience
Answer:b
Explanation:war is horrible and futile
The US Constitution
Which statements are true? Check all that apply.
The Constitution establishes a federal system of government.
Power is divided between the central government and the states.
States possess the expressed powers detailed in the Constitution.
Some powers are shared by the federal government and the states.
O States do not share powers with the federal government.
Answer:
Hello. I do not have an answer for this but I have a link to the question where you can find the answer.
Explanation:
https://brainly.com/question/2708609
Pro tip: Search up the question before you ask about it, it will help you out a ton and avoid any confusion!
Answer: True: The constitution establishes a federal system of government, these are the three different branches of government
True: Power is divided between the central government and the states, states have the power to make their own laws
False: States posses the expressed powers detailed in the Constitution, the Constitution states that any powers not specified for the federal government are given to the states
True: Some powers are shared by the federal government and the states, some examples include taxes, judicial systems, and property rights
False: States do not share powers with the federal government
Was the decision to divide Germany and Austria into four different zones a good idea?
Answer:
yes because then they had the opportunity to better themselves.
Explanation:
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
yes
HOW MANY MUSLIMS OR PEOPLE OF COLOR HAVE BEEN RACIALLY
PROFILED SINCE 9/11??
Answer:
Alot, even I have been. Even though i'm african american.
Explanation:
Since 9/11, there has been a significant increase in racial profiling and discrimination against Muslims and people of color, particularly those of Arab descent, in various aspects of public life including air travel and employment. Accurate numbers are difficult to quantify due to both reported and undocumented instances, but the impact is clear through increased hate crimes and discrimination cases. The resilience of Muslim communities in asserting their civil rights and diversity is notable amidst these challenges.
Explanation:Quantifying the exact number of Muslims or people of color who have been racially profiled since 9/11 is complex, as it involves undocumented instances alongside reported cases. What is clear is the marked increase in such incidents of racial profiling, particularly against Arab Americans and those perceived to be Muslim. This has been consistently documented in the wake of the September 11, 2001, terror attacks. The profiling spans various settings, including air travel, employment, and general public life. For example, Muslims have been disproportionately subjected to special searches at airports and have experienced significant discrimination in the workplace, despite legal protections against religious discrimination. The stereotype associating Islamophobia with terrorism has led to an environment where being young and Arab-looking is enough to warrant suspicion.
Notably, discrimination against Muslims extends beyond racial profiling to include hate crimes and social exclusion. The 21st century, particularly post 9/11, has seen Muslims as the religious minority most likely to face discrimination, with a notable increase in hate crimes. Engagement with civil liberties and the fight against such systemic biases has become paramount for communities affected.
The experience of Muslim communities in the United States underscores the resilience and diversity within this group, which encompasses a range of racial and ethnic backgrounds, including immigrant communities from the Arab region and South Asian descent, as well as a significant number of African-American Muslims. Despite these challenges, these communities have sought to assert their civil rights and contributions to American society.
Which imperial nation appears to have the most dominance in Africa?
Turkey
United Kingdom
France
Germany
Answer:
France
Explanation:
There is the most of France's color in Africa
Answer:
France
Explanation:
The color of France (green) covers most of the continent of Africa in the picture
What were some economic
effects of the Indian Removal
Act on Native Americans?
On whites?
Answer:
didnt know so googled it for you .
Explanation:
n general, the Indian Removal Act of 1830 had lasting effects on the Native American population. I think that Andrew Jackson and the white settlers should have been more considerate of the Native Americans. The whole purpose of the act was based on the greed for land, and the well being of its inhabitants was ignored.
Final answer:
The Indian Removal Act caused economic disruption and loss for Native Americans as they were forced off their ancestral lands, causing food shortages and weakening their economic power. Conversely, whites benefited economically by acquiring fertile lands for agriculture and resource extraction.
Explanation:
The Indian Removal Act of 1830 had profound economic effects on both Native Americans and whites. For Native Americans, confiscation of their ancestral lands led to significant upheaval and economic loss. Customary means of sustenance were disrupted, resulting in food shortages and economic instability. The fragmentation of tribes also created lasting division and weakened collective power over their resources and economic futures.
For whites, the removal of Native Americans often translated to economic gain. The newly acquired lands allowed for expanded agricultural activities, particularly the growth of the cotton industry. Settlers capitalized on the availability of fertile land for farming and resource extraction. Despite the ostensibly positive impacts on white settlers and the economy, such gains were coupled with the harsh reality of the inhumane treatment and forced displacement of Native peoples.
How did changes in Georgia’s agriculture during the second half of the 20th century affect the distribution of population in the state?
Answer:
G.I bill was passed towards the end of the World War II. The law provided some benefits for World War II veterans who came back into the country.
The bill gave an education offer to everyone with no exception so farmers and their children can go to college.
More homes were built possibly taking up more farmland.
These changes led to a drop
In Agricultural activities.More houses being built coupled with free education in the region encouraged more people coming into the area to benefit from such program.
In the latter half of the 20th century, changes in agriculture due to mechanization led to the decline of small family farms and prompted a rural-to-urban migration in Georgia, as people sought job opportunities in cities due to urban economic development.
Impact of Agricultural Changes on Georgia's Population Distribution
In the second half of the 20th century, significant changes in agriculture led to a redistribution of population in Georgia. With the Industrial Revolution bringing improved farm equipment and methods, small-scale family farms began to sell out as farms increased in size and required less labor. This shift meant fewer employment opportunities in rural areas, leading to a rural-to-urban migration as people sought job opportunities in more developed areas.
The growth of cities can be attributed to the decline in small family farming due to the mechanization and industrialization of agriculture. Economic development and the worldwide demand for American agricultural products had initially led to a boom for small farms, but external factors such as global conflicts and rural-to-urban migration patterns significantly impacted the distribution of population. This urban population surge was reinforced by a decrease in the number of farmers but an increase in productivity due to mechanization.
Georgia, along with other southern states, experienced these trends. By the 1960s, the region started to develop a more diverse economy. Businesses were attracted to the area because of lower wages and taxes, further accelerating the migration from rural to urban areas as people moved to the cities in search of better living standards and employment opportunities.
How did technology change the nature of war, including its impact on civilians, on a global scale? What type of technology would you bring from the 21st century to help your country win , what would it be and why?
Which working condition was NOT prevalent in nineteenth century factories?
unsanitary conditions
high pay
boredom
danger
Answer:
high pay
Explanation:
19th century factory conditions were extremely dangerous, low paid and definitely in unsanitary conditions. Factory owners wanted to make as much money as possible so often they would squeeze as many people into a small space as possible. Small children would often be employed as they could fit inside the machines to repair them if they broke - so they would very quickly get bored.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Which of the selections below reflect some of the United States' basic foreign policy goals?
Select one:
A. all of these
B. protecting human rights
C. preserving self-determination
D. avoiding armed conflict
I pretty sure It cuold be the " Protecting human rights"
Answer:
A. all of these
Explanation:
Hamas was formed around the group's opposition to the country of _____.
Answer:
Israel
Explanation:
Answer:
B)
Explanation:
Israel
Why did John Musgrave throw away his medals??
Answer:
We carried our medals as credentials for our courage, because we knew that we were going to be accused of having not served.
John Musgrave, a former Marine, discarded his war medals as an expression of guilt and resentment towards the violence of the Vietnam War and his own actions during the conflict.
Explanation:John Musgrave, a former Marine in the Vietnam War, threw away his medals due to the guilt and pain he felt from his wartime experiences. The war had a profound impact on his life and his perspective on the conflict, leading to feelings of resentment and disillusionment. To Musgrave, discarding his medals was a symbolic act, representing his rejection of the war's violence and his own actions during that time. His gesture does not diminish the bravery he showed during the war, but instead, it reflects his personal battle with the emotional trauma and moral conflict he carried.
Learn more about John Musgrave here:https://brainly.com/question/33075217
#SPJ12
What were the social & economic effects of the Black Death on Europe?
Answer:
that people in front of them die and then econmony went down
Explanation:
According to the bar chart, what is the median of number of times a teenager reminded to do chores a week?
Answer:
The mean number of reminder is 3 times
Explanation:
The question is incomplete without the bar chart please see attached bar chart
Mean is a measure of central tendency, sometimes called the average.
To find the mean, add the numbers and divide the sum by the number of addends.
In this case we have
1,2,3,4,5
1+2+3+4+5=15/5= 3
Answer:the answer is 3 times
Explanation:Add up all the numbers then divide each of them by how many there are
The fatal mistake made by Russia's provisional government was
-They raised food prices to cover the cost of the revolution.
-They continued to participate in WWI.
-They murdered the Czar and his family.
-They invaded Crimea.
Answer:
They continued to participate in WWI
Explanation:
The Russian provisional government was formed in 2nd March after the abdication of the Tsar Nicholas II, the last emperor of Russia. After the provisional government was formed, series of attempt was made to get the country together in the midst of growing anarchy but it seems not to be working.
The fatal mistake they made which led to more crises was the annoncement by the minister of Foreign Affairs Pavel Milyukov, who promised to continue the war to its glourious conclusion. This led to massive demonstrations by the workers and the soldiers due to their disposition of the war not being continued.
What does Juarez mean by the phrase ""the incessant convulsions that the Republic has suffered""?
Answer:
He meant that, the Mexican Republic has suffered from severe but incessant political instability and violence
Explanation:
This statement is credited to Benito Juarez, the 26th president of Mexico, who held the position between 1858 to 1872, he is identified as a liberal and was regarded as a preeminent symbol of Mexican nationalism and resistance to foreign intervention.
In his view about the Mexican 1824 constitution, he said amongst other things "...The constitution of 1824 was a compromise between progress and reaction, and that (it was a) seedbed of the incessant convulsions that the Republic has suffered, and that it will still suffer while society does not recover its balance by making effective the equality of rights and duties of all citizens and of all persons who inhabit the national territory, without privileges, without exemptions, without monopolies, and without odious distinctions…”
Hence, he is referring to the 1824 constitution of Mexico which is the basis for incessant political turmoil, instability and national violence in Mexico at the time.
Final answer:
Juarez's reference to 'the incessant convulsions that the Republic has suffered' speaks to the period of political instability and social upheaval following Mexico's independence, marked by conflicts between conservatives and liberals, social reform attempts, and the lack of stable governance.
Explanation:
When Benito Juarez referred to “the incessant convulsions that the Republic has suffered,” he was evoking the turbulent history of Mexico following its independence from Spanish rule. These 'convulsions' would include the various internal conflicts, political instability, and social upheavals that had continuously affected the nation as it struggled to establish a stable and effective government. The history of Mexico since its independence was marked by struggles between conservative and liberal forces, major social reforms, and the frequent changes of government and constitutions, all of which could be described as 'convulsions' shaking the foundation of the nascent Mexican Republic.
The Grito de Dolores in 1810, led by Miguel Hidalgo y Costilla, began the process of independence and set forth social change as a goal alongside political independence. However, this revolutionary movement was met with resistance and resulted in Hidalgo's execution. Further efforts toward independence, such as those led by José Maria Morelos, and later the Plan de Iguala by Iturbide, all contributed to the shaking of the Old regime and the challenging of the New Spain's colonial structure. The Constitution of 1824 aimed to balance liberal social reforms and conservative interests, signifying another step in the tumultuous journey of the young republic.
Write a paragraph summarizing Gandhi's influence. How
should he be remembered?
Some of the greatest ways through which Mahatma influenced our lives were teaching of non violence, standing against intolerance and injustice.
Explanation:
One of the greatest ways in which Mahatma Gandhi has influenced our lives and thinking is by teaching us the principle and the importance of using non violence in life for solving the problems we face in life.
His standing up against intolerance, injustice influenced a lot of people. He was very brave and full of courage who was not at all for standing against the wrong. He influenced some of the strongest people like Nelson Mandela, Martin Luther King Jr.
Answer:
Gandhi absolutely believed in using nonviolent approaches to solving life's problems. He protested against injustice and intolerance, and he was not afraid to do what he thought was right. He influenced many leaders, from Martin Luther King Jr. to Nelson Mandela. His legacy will continue long into the future.Explanation:
About how many men did NOT return to Spain on Magellan's voyage?
25
50
100
200
Answer: answer is 200
Explanation:
When Nixon refused to withdraw support of Israel, OPEC responded by:
O
A. refusing to sell oil to the United States.
B. increasing the trade of oil with the United States.
O
C. giving in to American demands.
O
D. seeking the intervention of the Soviet Union.
When Nixon refused to withdraw support of Israel, OPEC responded by:
O
A. refusing to sell oil to the United States.
Explanation:
Although OPEC had traded with US primarily for oil during that time the diplomatic pressure and the differences due to the support for Israel became too great for them
This resulted in the fact that they with drew from the trade deals with US and the nation was left to fend for itself for its massive oil needs.
It served as a catalyst for more open realizations for trade with neighbor nations and reliance on other sources.
The war had forced US to look for different trade partners.
Answer:
a refusing to sell oil the the united states
Explanation:
What is the ""myth"" of America's founding according to Howard Zinn?
Answer:
Myth of the American Founding Fathers, is that the American civil war or revolution was fought for the purpose or on behalf of a united people
Explanation:
In Howard Zinn's book titled "A People’s History of the United States" Zinn depicts American history from the perception of the oppressed, persecuted, powerless, and marginalized people, rather than the usual heroes and elites views.
Hence, among many ways, in which he expressed himself in the book, is him writing about the American Myth of the American Founding Fathers; is that the American civil war or revolution was fought for the purpose or on behalf of a united people, which according to him, it is false, rather, it was fought in favour of the wealthy and elites in the states, so as to protect their interest.
___ learning occurs when people observe and imitate the behavior
of others *
Social
O
Cognitive
Latent
Behavioral
Answer:
Observational learning
Explanation:
Observational learning occurs when you observe the behavior of others. It also is a form of social learning which takes various forms.
Social learning involves learning behaviors and responses by observation, a concept central to social-cognitive learning theory and demonstrated through observational learning, such as the famous Bobo doll experiment.
Social learning occurs when individuals learn new responses and behaviors by observing the behavior of others. This type of learning is rooted in the social-cognitive learning theory, which emphasizes the importance of observing and modeling the behaviors, attitudes, and emotional reactions of others. Observational learning, a component of this theory, suggests that people, especially children, can learn by simply watching others.
For example, children learn various social behaviors by imitating their parents or peers. Observational learning doesn't require reinforcement to occur; instead, it can happen through merely watching someone, which is a powerful way of learning social norms, problem-solving skills, and complex behaviors. This idea is supported by classic experiments, such as Bandura's Bobo doll experiment, where children observed an adult acting aggressively towards a doll and later mimicked that behavior.
Why is important we learned about Robert E. Lee
Answer:
leader of the Confederate army
Explanation:
^
Final answer:
Studying Robert E. Lee is significant in understanding the complexities of the American Civil War, leadership dilemmas, and the lasting impact on the nation's history and identity.
Explanation:
Learning about Robert E. Lee is important because he was a central figure in the American Civil War, serving as the Confederate commander. His leadership during crucial battles such as The Seven Days showcases both military strategy and the complexity of individual allegiance, exemplified by Lee's decision to side with his home state of Virginia despite his loyalty to the United States. Additionally, understanding Lee's role helps students grasp the broader context of the Civil War, including issues of slavery, states' rights, and national identity, which still resonate today. Through figures like Lee, students learn to analyze historical events critically, understand the nuances of leadership, and the long-lasting impact of past conflicts on current social and political landscapes. In educational materials, perspectives on Lee often personalize historical figures, helping students to relate to and reflect upon important themes such as duty, honor, and the deeply divided loyalties that characterized the Civil War era.
Describe how the people of England and Europe felt about Queen Catherine.
Answer:
thrilled
Explanation:
Queen Catherine was very popular with the English people. everyone loved her they and how she dealt with things in England and also in her life.
Final answer:
The people of England and Europe had mixed feelings about Queen Catherine. Before Henry VIII divorced her, Catherine was well-liked and respected. However, after the divorce, the views towards Catherine changed.
Explanation:
The people of England and Europe had mixed feelings about Queen Catherine. Before Henry VIII divorced her, Catherine was well-liked and respected. She had a reputation for being a devout Catholic and was married to Henry, who was initially a critic of Protestantism. However, after the divorce, the views towards Catherine changed, especially among Protestants who saw her as an obstacle to Henry's desire for a male heir.
What was the goal of the abolitionist movement?
to end the practice of slavery
to end the practice of imprisonment
to end the practice of physical punishment
The abolitionist movement was the social and political effort to end slavery everywhere. Fueled in part by religious fervor, the movement was led by people.
What was the goal of the abolitionist movement?The main goal of the abolitionist movement was to end the practice of slavery.The main reason for this was for creating the emotional climate necessary for ending the slave trade and slavery.
To learn more about abolitionist movement refer :
https://brainly.com/question/26706450
#SPJ2
After the fall of the Roman Empire,Europe was broken up into Barbarian kingdom.true or false
kekalahan Melaka kepada Portugis bukan menandakan berakhirnya pemerintahan kesultanan melayu melaka? Berikan hujah anda
Answer: What language is this ?
Explanation: im sorry i dont know
Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev believed that:
O
A. capitalism and Communism could coexist.
O
B. history was on his side.
O
c. America and Russia were not competing.
O
D. All of the above
Answer:
B. History was on his side
Explanation:
First Secretary Khrushchev said: "About the capitalist states, it doesn't depend on you whether or not we exist. If you don't like us, don't accept our invitations, and don't invite us to come to see you. Whether you like it or not, history is on our side. We will bury you!"
Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev believed that history was on his side. Hence, option B is appropriate.
Who was Nikita Khrushchev?From 1953 to 1964, Nikita Sergeyevich Khrushchev served as the Communist Party of the Soviet Union's First Secretary and served as its chairman from 1958 to 1964.
The early Soviet space program was supported by Nikita Khrushchev, as were moderate domestic policy reforms. He had some false beginnings and narrowly missed a nuclear conflict over Cuba before conducting productive talks with the US to defuse Cold War tensions.
With Khrushchev's Thaw, several Western films, literature, works of art, and musical genres were permitted into Soviet culture. Although the official Soviet censorship practices had altered, certain previously outlawed writers and composers, including Anna Akhmatova and Mikhail Zoshchenko, were allowed to resume their public lives.
Hence, option B is correct.
Learn more about Nikita Khrushchev here:
https://brainly.com/question/11513050
#SPJ3