The correct answer is false. this is so because each of the statements mentioned above lacks supporting evidence indicating why "driving while using a cell phone should be illegal." Arguments are claims backed by reasons that are supported by evidence.
The two major general factors that should guide your analysis of an intended audience are:
a. education and income.
b. gender and education.
c. social status and ideological factors.
d. attitudinal and demographic factors.
The two major general factors that should guide your analysis of an intended audience are gender and education. Thus, option B is the correct option.
Gender and education are two major general factors that should guide the analysis of an intended audience. Gender plays a crucial role in shaping individuals' perspectives, experiences, and needs. It influences the way people perceive information, communicate, and make decisions.
Understanding the gender composition of the audience helps tailor messages to resonate with their unique preferences and perspectives. Education, on the other hand, provides insights into the knowledge, skills, and intellectual capabilities of the audience.
It helps determine their understanding of complex concepts, their level of literacy, and their receptiveness to certain types of communication. Analyzing gender and education together allows for a more comprehensive understanding of the audience and enables effective communication strategies to be developed.
Thus, option B is the correct option.
Learn more about audience here:
https://brainly.com/question/28566711
#SPJ4
Book thief part 8 why does the coat man visit alex stieners house
what is the best definition of the underlined word in the following line? other than these small businesses ,there are more shingled hoses,the same shape size and in the same state of mld decrepitude ,painted mint,or lilac, or powder blue,''
Lines 114-119: what do we learn about the progress of the witch hunt from Elizabeth's dialogue in these lines ?
The best answer for this question would be:
In these lines it is revealed that the progress of the witch hunt is actually becoming an independent being on its own. It is continued because of certain reputations and considerations of the political dynamic that it may cause.
Which of the following sentences is correct? Which of the following sentences does not properly use a subordinating conjunction? A. As the man said, what comes around goes around. B. I will refuse his demands because they are outrageous. C. He acts like he's going to cry. D. You stay put unless I call for you.
what are post reading strategies for fiction
" Don't you give me none o' your lip," says he. "You've put on considerable many frills since I been away. I'lI take you down a peg before I get done with you. You're educated, too, they say-can read and write. You think you're better'n your father, now, don't you, because he can't? I'LL take it out of you. Who told you you might meddle with such hifalut'n foolishness, hey?-who told you you could?" Based on the excerpt, which is the most reasonable plot prediction?
Based on the excerpt, the most reasonable plot prediction is:
A.) Huck and his father will engage in an altercation.According to the complete question, we can see that Huck and his father are having an argument and they are exchanging some heated words
As a result of this, we can make a prediction that as a result of this disagreement, the father and son would engage in an altercation.
Therefore, the correct answer is option A
Read more here:
https://brainly.com/question/18995916
how the first four chapters would have been different had they been told from the point of view of Ivan Ilyich’s wife, Praskovya Fyodorovna. What information would have been left out? What would the main focal points have been?
Answer:
In the sample answer form Plato. It tells how Praskovya would have told the story from her point of view. See the sample explanation below.
Explanation:
The Death of Ivan Ilyich uses a third person omniscient narration, so the narrator is able to describe the thoughts, actions, and motives of multiple characters. If the first four chapters of the novella were told from Praskovya Fyodorovna's point of view, her judgment and perspective would have clouded the way we see the thoughts, actions, and motives of the other characters. For example, if the section about Ivan Ilyich's funeral had been told from her perspective, the narration might have been overly focused on her apparent grief. But readers, privy to her internal thoughts, would also realize that she didn’t care much about her husband, in life or in death. She might have centered the narration around Ivan Ilyich's suffering, how even she suffered because of Ivan Ilyich's illness, and how it was better now that he was gone. She would describe the ordeal she went through in the last few days before Ivan Ilyich's death. Given her apparent selfish character, she might well have made it seem like she suffered more than Ivan himself.
The account of their marriage would also have been different if told from Praskovya Fyodorovna's perspective. She would probably portray Ivan Ilyich as a suitable match for herself. She might focus on the fact that he was a successful magistrate from a good family with good character and fine dancing skills. She would describe their courtship, how she fell in love with him, and their marriage in greater detail. She might tell us how she was really happy to be married to him, at least initially, and describe the first few months of her marriage as beautiful and happy. She’d likely describe how being a mother was hard and demanding, made more difficult by a husband who wasn't supportive. She would describe her outrage when Ivan starts to spend more time with friends, at parties, and at bridge games, apparently to avoid her.
Her perspective about Ivan Ilyich's illness would also be very different from what we actually read in chapter 4 of the novella. She'd probably complain about how Ivan was trying to get attention by fussing about some trivial health problem. She'd feel that his illness was his fault because he wouldn’t follow the doctor's instructions and would eat and drink all the wrong things, while she had to bear the consequences of his "illness."
Some details from the first four chapters would also be missing if the story were told from Praskovya Fyodorovna's point of view. For example, we wouldn’t have known of Ivan Ilyich's colleagues' thoughts about and reactions to his death. Praskovya wasn't part of this discussion, and she obviously couldn’t read their minds. She wouldn't have been able to write about Peter Ivanovich's fears and thoughts about death. The details of Ivan Ilyich's early life would also vary depending on her knowledge of Ivan Ilyich's family and his childhood. She wouldn't have been able to describe what Ivan was going through after their marriage and the birth of their children because he wasn't sharing his thoughts and feelings with her. And lastly, she was probably clueless about Ivan Ilyich's health concerns and his fear of death because they didn't talk much about it.
Where did the greek gods gets there names from?
The fairies (Oberon, Titania, Robin), the lovers (Hermia, Helena, Lysander, Demetrius), and the nobles (Theseus and Hippolyta) speak in rhymed verse or blank verse. However, Bottom and his friends speak in prose (no rhyme or rhythm).
How does this create different tones for the different scenes?
A. The important scenes use lines of rhymed verse to produce a formal tone, while dreamlike scenes use lines of blank verse to produce an informal tone.
B. The lines in prose create a formal tone in the scene, while the lines in verse create an informal tone in the scene.
C. The lines in verse create a formal tone in the scene, while the lines in prose create an informal tone in the scene.
D. The lines of Bottom and his friends are prose, which creates a formal tone to reflect the real world, while the lines of the fairies are rhymed verse, which creates an informal tone to reflect the dream world.
Answer:
C. The lines in verse create a formal tone in the scene, while the lines in prose create an informal tone in the scene.
Explanation:
The action takes place in Athens and adjacent woods amid the time of fantasy in antiquated Greece. Be that as it may, the play has the environment and cheerful inclination of a place where there is charm that could be anyplace. In spite of the fact that the characters live in the environs of Athens, a significant number of them talk and act like Elizabethan Englishmen. The season of the activity is June 24. In Elizabethan England, Midsummer Day—the dining experience of Saint John the Baptist—fell on that date. It was a period of devouring and joy. On Midsummer Night, pixies, demons, and witches held their celebration. To dream about Midsummer Night, consequently, was to dream about abnormal animals and bizarre happenings—like those in the play.
what is a difference between the storm depicted in the dickinson poem compared to the ccr song?
Answer:
A) In the poem the storm ends, but in the song it doesn't stop.
Explanation:
The ending of the poem speaks of the "peace" of the storm breaking, but the song ends with the rain still not having been stopped.
“When we are struck at without a reason, we should strike back again very hard … so hard as to teach the person who struck us never to do it again.”
What is Jane’s philosophy as conveyed in this passage from Jane Eyre by Charlotte Brontë?
A. Quick reactions can lead to trouble for people we love.
B. People should teach their enemies rather than do them harm.
C. Random violence is an inevitable fact of life.
D. People should react with force against injustice.
Answer:
A Jane’s philosophy that is conveyed in this passage from Jane Eyre by Charlotte Brontë is People should react with force against injustice.
Explanation:
This little excerpt from "Jane Eyre" by Charlotte Brontë shows the philosophy of a strong person who would never let other overpower in any way, according to the words in these lines "When we are struck at without a reason" the person is being attacked there is injustice and violence and should not be ignored or allowed.
Read the following poem by Grace Paley and answer the question that follows. Your response should be 2–3 sentences in length. Family"
My father was brilliant embarrassed funny handsome
my mother was plain serious principled kind
my grandmother was intelligent lonesome for her other life her dead children silent
my aunt was beautiful bitter angry loving
I fell among these adjectives in earliest childhood
and was nearly buried with opportunity some of them stuck to me others finding me American and smooth slipped away.
What does the speaker of the poem imply about being American?
Final answer:
In Grace Paley's poem 'Family,' the speaker suggests that being American involves a degree of cultural assimilation where certain ethnic or familial characteristics may slip away while others stick, reflecting America's identity as a melting pot.
Explanation:
The speaker of the poem Family by Grace Paley implies that being American is associated with a certain smoothness, suggesting a malleability or adaptability that allows some characteristics to stick while others slip away. This metaphorical description indicates that the American identity can sometimes mean letting go of or losing certain ethnic or familial attributes to blend into a broader, more homogenized culture. As the speaker reflects on the adjectives used to describe their relatives, they note that some qualities did not adhere to them due to their American identity, representing the cultural assimilation process often experienced by individuals in the United States.
How are the Greek values of family and perseverance shown through odysseus’s return home
Odysseus was gone for too long. He spend decades trying to get home and still, his wife, his son, and even his servants were all constantly anxious to have him back. They all missed him and throughout the whole time that he was away, and not only they had never given up on the idea that he'd return home, you can see that his son honored Odysseus by trying to get rid of the suitors (his son). Once he is home, the welcoming is very warm. And he and his son kill together those who were in his house bothering his family.
Read the excerpt from "Bluesman on the Move.”
Which word best describes the tone of these stanzas?
Read this line from the text
During the intervening time the Japanese government has deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statement and expressions of hope for continued peace
Which of the following implications is supported by this text
The attacks betrayed a certain trust between the countries
The attacks could be reversed with a targeted peace negotiation
The United States should have known it was being deceived
Yeah United States was aware Japan was planning attack
The attacks betrayed a certain trust between the countries. I believe this is the answer because the Japanese kept sending messages that seemed harmless to the U.S., but they were really holding the peace with the USA so they could surprise attack us.
Deceiving by the false statement is the implication of "the attacks betrayed a certain trust between the countries," so, option (A) is the correct answer.
What do the lines imply about trust?The Japanese administration has tried to deceive the US by making deceptive statements and expressing hope for prolonged peace.
This is an example of betraying the trust between countries viz., Japan and the United States of America (USA).
Check out the link below to learn more about deceiving statements;
https://brainly.com/question/2630953
#SPJ2
Where is the summary of the main idea and support usually found in an informational text?
Introduction
Third body paragraph
Transition sentences
Conclusion
Where is the summary of the main idea and support usually found in an informational text?
A introduction
Hamlet says that comparing his father to Claudius is like comparing "Hyperion to a satyr." Hyperion is an ancient Greek god of light. A satyr is a creature that is half man and half goat. What does Hamlet’s allusion suggest?
A) King Claudius is very similar to Hamlet’s father.
B) King Claudius is a better king than Hamlet’s father was.
C) Hamlet’s father was far superior to King Claudius.
C. Hamlet's father was far superior to King Claudius.
Hamlet’s allusion suggest about the comparison between Hamlet’s father was far superior to King Claudius. Thus, option (c) is correct.
What is comparing?
The term comparing refers to between difference of the two or more object and people. The comparing to the two people with specific topic. The comparison are the two people are the created the demotivation to the people. The comparing the similar elements. It was to examine of two or more people.
Hyperion was a titan rather than a god. The two are not the same. By comparing Hyperion to his father, Hamlet made it plain that he regarded his father as a just and benevolent ruler. King Claudius was vastly inferior to Hamlet's father.
As a result, the comparison of the Hamlet’s father was far superior to King Claudius. Therefore, option (c) is correct.
Learn more about comparing, here:
https://brainly.com/question/14908224
#SPJ2
______ the war, most Italians were farmers.
A: To
B: From
C: While
D: Before
E: When
Read this excerpt from The Call of the Wild by Jack London.
He rushed, as though attempting the old shoulder trick, but at the last instant swept low to the snow and in. His teeth closed on Spitz's left fore leg. There was a crunch of breaking bone, and the white dog faced him on three legs. Thrice he tried to knock him over, then repeated the trick and broke the right fore leg. Despite the pain and helplessness, Spitz struggled madly to keep up. He saw the silent circle, with gleaming eyes, lolling tongues, and silvery breaths drifting upward, closing in upon him as he had seen similar circles close in upon beaten antagonists in the past. Only this time he was the one who was beaten.
How does Buck’s behavior support the theme "intelligence is superior to strength”?
Buck is smart enough to know that he needs the other dogs’ help in battle.
Buck successfully defeats Spitz because he outsmarts him with a trick.
Buck successfully defends himself from Spitz by escaping the circle.
Buck is clever enough to use the snow as a weapon against Spitz.
answer: B :) just trying to help someone in need
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Buck's behaviour supports the theme "intelligence is superior to strength" as Buck successfully defeats Spitz because he outsmarts him with a trick. The correct option is b.
Who is Buck from the novel The Call of the Wild?Buck, is the main character in the novel The Call of the Wild. He is a four-year-old, 140-pound Saint Bernard and Scotch shepherd mix. His father was a huge Saint Bernard and the companion of Judge Miller. When Buck's father passed away, Buck became the new buddy Judge Miller. In the novel written by Jack London, the story is told from the perspective of Buck.
We are told how Buck thinks and feels as if he is human. Giving human-like characteristics to an animal is called anthropomorphism. The author uses this technique to tell the story and reveal some things about Buck's character. Judge Miller has a large estate in the Santa Clara Valley in California.
Buck ruled the property and was free to roam as he pleased among the orchards and pastures.
Learn more about Buck, here:
https://brainly.com/question/11624569
#SPJ3
Your question was incomplete but most probably your full question was,
Which statement best explains Buck's behaviour supporting the theme that intelligence is superior to strength?
A. Buck is smart enough to know that he needs the other dogs' help in battle.
B. Buck successfully defeats Spitz because he outsmarts him with a trick.
C. Buck successfully defends himself from Spitz by escaping the circle.
D. Buck is clever enough to use the snow as a weapon against Spitz.
Needing English 9th Grade
Help! :C
Read the poem.
excerpt from “I Explain a Few Things” by Pablo Neruda
And one morning all was aflame
and one morning the fires
came out of the earth
devouring people,
and from then on fire,
gunpowder from then on,
and from then on blood.
Bandits with airplanes and with Moors,
bandits with rings and duchesses,
bandits with black-robed friars blessing
came through the air to kill children,
and through the streets the blood of children
ran simply, like children’s blood.
Jackals that the jackal would spurn,
stones that the dry thistle would bite spitting,
vipers that vipers would abhor!
Facing you I have seen the blood
of Spain rise up
to drown you in a single wave
of pride and knives!
Question:
Refer to Explorations in Literature for a complete version of this poem.
Which explanation about “I Explain a Few Things” best develops the speaker’s viewpoint that adversity only makes his compatriots stronger?
A.) By describing the “Bandits with airplanes and with Moors,” the speaker demonstrates that these aggressors will not be tolerated.
B.) By stating that citizens will “rise up / to drown you in a single wave,” the speaker indicates they are determined to overcome their opponents.
C.) The image of jackals and vipers illustrates that the opponents are savage and will fight viciously in order to win the war.
D.) The image of flames coming out of the earth to devour people shows the level of suffering the war causes citizens to endure.
On one of these sale days, I saw a mother lead seven children to the auction-block. She knew that some of them would be taken from her; but they took all. The children were sold to a slave-trader, and their mother was brought by a man in her own town. Before night her children were all far away. She begged the trader to tell her where he intended to take them; this he refused to do. How could he, when he knew he would sell them, one by one, wherever he could command the highest price? I met that mother in the street, and her wild, haggard face lives to-day in my mind. She wrung her hands in anguish, and exclaimed, "Gone! All gone! Why don't God kill me?" I had no words wherewith to comfort her. Instances of this kind are of daily, yea, of hourly occurrence. Based on this passage, what was one effect of slave sales? A) Many ended their own lives. B) Traders always made a profit. C) Families were split up and scattered. D) These social events were looked forward to.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
URGENT A few good rules and procedures would keep this classroom from devolving into ____
A. Tragedy
B. Anarchy
C. Mediocre
D. Fate
Answer:
B. Anarchy.
Explanation:
Logically, semantically and meaningfully, the only word that can fill in the blank is anarchy. This is the case because the phrase is making reference to installing a few rules and procedures to abide by in the classroom, lest it devolves into: anarchy. Anarchy, by its etymology, means the absence of governing principles or rules, that is to say, the lack of rules.
Which visual aid is best for representing the steps needed to publish the school yearbook?
a table of contents for the yearbook
a graph showing the circulation of the yearbook
a diagram showing each step
a picture of the yearbook staff
In order for a fictionalized story to be based on real events the author should indicate
Why did President Jackson believe that the "white" way of life was superior to the American Indian way of life?
Who recognizes romeo and how does he recognize him act 1 sene 5?
10 new words in the book the girl who drank the moon
Character pieces are by definition A. short. B. based on real people. C. funny. D. complicated.
Answer:
B) Based on real people
Explanation:
60 POINTS!!! PLEASE HELPPPPPPPPP!!!!
Which is an example of a correct citation for a website with an unknown author?
A. Author unknown. "Frances Hodgson Burnett." Penguin.com. The Penguin Group, 2014. Web. 14 March, 2014.
B. "Frances Hodgson Burnett." Penguin.com. The Penguin Group, 2014.
C. Penguin.com. "Frances Hodgson Burnett." The Peguin Group, 2014. Web. 14 March, 2014.
D. "Frances Hodgson Burnett." Penguin.com. The Peguin Group, 2014. Web. 14 March, 2014.
P.S Please do NOT answer this question if you have not taken the same test or if you are not 100% sure your answer is correct.And also not because you just want points. Thanks again! <3