Political change in Latin America:
The politics changed majorly in Latin America as the older structures were being removed and inhabitants were setting out to programs after post colonial rule. Although the major difficulty of the decade was faced to establish the legitimacy of the new governments. In Iberian region the greater extent of powers lie in the hands of monarch.
Only the monarch had the authority over the church, the military and various other institutions in the regions of Latin America. Gradually the leaders of Latin America stated adopting traditional political methods which were inspired by northern Europe and United States, there by started establishing republics across the region.
What was a major cause of nativist attitudes during the 1920s?
A. emergence of the Second Ku Klux Klan
B. the growing diversity of languages, customs, and religions in the U.S.
C. the controversial trial of Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti
D. the intense debate surrounding teaching evolution in schools
the controversial trial of Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti was a major cause of nativist attitudes during the 1920s.
Answer: Option C
Explanation:
During the early period of 20th Century, there was influx of immigrants in U.S. giving rise to the nativism in America. This led to growing diversity of religion, language, culture, etc. which caused great fear and anxiety in the minds of the natives and also led to the adoption of racial attitude towards the immigrants.
Nativism saw its zenith during the trial of Bartolomeo Vanzetti and Nicola Sacco who were the immigrants from Italy and they were accused of robbery and murder. Despite the lack in incriminating evidence they were declared guilty by the jury and finally executed on 23rd August 1927.
Answer:
I believe the answer may be B. The growing diversity of languages, customs, and religions in the U.S.
Explanation:
With immigrants coming from different countries and bringing in new languages, customs, and religions, some native-born Americans became very uneased, which sometimes even resulted in racial hostility. Some Americans took up nativism, which was a policy of favoring native inhabitants over immigrants. These people dismissed outside influences while favoring their own local customs.
What did Karl Marx believe his version of communism could do for society?
a. He saw communism as a way to end the cycle of violent unrest in society once and for all.
b. He thought communism could bring the benefits of capitalism to everyone.
c. He predicted communism would make violent revolution a permanent part of life.
d. He wanted communism to strengthen the power of the bourgeoisie.
In 35 words or fewer, explain how you think people in the United States
and in other countries reacted to Neil Armstrong's walk on the moon.
Type answer here..
Answer:
The general reaction was of astonishment and admiration around the world, because it was an extraordinary tecnological and scientific achievement, "a giant step for mankind," as the pope put it. In the US, people felt proud of being American. Let´s remember there was a Cold War and competition with the Soviets also had space as one of its battlefields, there was a space race between the two superpowers.
Explanation:
What are bonds?
A) dividends
B) certificates of deposit
C) loans
D) stocks
Answer:
C. They´re loans.
Explanation:
Before a general election can take place, a political party may hold a blank election to select a candidate for office.
Answer: before a general election can take place, a political party may hold a PRIMARY election to select a candidate for office.
Explanation:
ANSWER: HOW ARE WE GOING TO NVM
what was the primary purpose of a stamp act
Answer:
American colonists and required them to pay a tax on every piece of printed paper they used. Ship's papers, legal documents, licenses, newspapers, other publications, and even playing cards were taxed.The primary purpose of the Stamp Act was to generate revenue for Britain by imposing a direct tax on the colonies for printed materials. This act eventually led to widespread protests and was a significant catalyst for the American Revolution.
Explanation:The Stamp Act was a law enacted by the British Parliament in 1765 at a time when Britain was attempting to recoup some costs associated with the French and Indian War (Seven Years' War). Its primary purpose was to generate revenue for Britain by introducing a direct tax on the colonies for printed materials.
Various items, such as legal documents, newspapers, and even playing cards were to be issued on special stamped paper which was taxed.
This attempt to gather revenue without the consent of the colonists led to widespread protests and was a significant catalyst for the American Revolution.
Learn more about Stamp Act here:https://brainly.com/question/19013647
#SPJ6
(*) 18. Why is the Senate membership elected or changed over in this way?
Senate membership is elected or changed over to ensure that the senate seats are not left vacant. This method of changing Senate membership also ensures that every state gets enough representation.
Explanation:
In general, there are two senate seats for every state legislature which means that there are two Senators from each state. The method of changing senate membership also is a purity that no bribes and corruption are involved in the selection of the senators. The US senate has 100 members who are elected for six years and one third are renewed every 2 years.
Which of these led to the development of democratic principles and was a right of all Roman citizens?
To vote in assemblies
To be tried by a jury
To marry anyone they chose
To own property
The correct answer is B) To be tried by a jury.
What led to the development of democratic principles and was a right of all Roman citizens was the right to be tried by a jury.
We are talking the Roman Law, which has influenced many modern countries. The Roman Empire used the Roman Law to resolve civil trials in a forum. The praetor listened to both parts in a trial. In the case of criminal law, the praetor judges and determine the witnesses for a trial. In ancient Rome, all Roman citizens had the right to be tried by a jury. And this principle is the basis of modern-day democracy.
Answer:
B. To be tried by a jury
Explanation:
The Supreme Court has completed the process of writing the final opinion in a case. What is the next step for the Supreme Court?
A) to ask the president if he agreed with the decision
B) to discuss how the justices can enforce the decision
C) to announce the decision by sending printed copies to the media
D) to reflect and discuss whether the appropriate decison was made
Answer:
The answer is C) to announce the decision by sending printed copies to the media .
Explanation:
Once the judges have voted on the final decision and a final written version is reached, we´re at the end of the process. The last remaining step is to inform the public about the sentence.
Where did tulips originate?
The Netherlands
Egypt
India
China
Answer:Netherlands
Explanation:
technically the answer is Turkey, but they became "famous" via the Netherlands
How might this "cultural colonialism" affect Asia even today?
Answer:
Even after the end of colonial empires and the rise of new , modern states in Asia after WWII, old racist prejudices remain. Some circles in Europe, Australia and the US (the West) continue to believe in the superiority of Western values and models, demeaning Asian local cultures and experiences. Those notions and attitudes usually fail to understand local history and political cultures, and customs.
Explanation:
Is this statement true or false?
The colonists supported the Stamp Act.
true
false
Answer: No not at all, False
Explanation: the stamp made them pay taxes to the British which they didn’t like.
Imagine an article in which the writer describes how volcanoes are formed on earth. Which answer choice would best identify the authors purpose for writing such an article?
A) to instruct readers how to create their own model volcanoes.
B) to entertain readers with a funny story set inside a volcano.
C) to inform readers about a natural phenomena.
D) to persuade readers to flee from active volcanoes.
Answer:haiya i took a test on this and the answer was c)to inform readers about a natural phenomena
hope this was helpful <3
Explanation:
Answer:
C) to inform readers about a natural phenomena.
Explanation:
if your in k12
Which statement best describes this author's point of
view?
|
"Deutschland Erwache!"
Awake, Germany! There was thunderous applause. Then
the masses took a solemn oath "to save Germany in
Bavaria from Bolshevism."
I do not know how to describe the emotions that swept
over me as I heard this man. His words were like a
scourge. When he spoke of the disgrace of Germany, I felt
ready to spring on any enemy. His appeal to German
manhood was like a call to arms, the gospel he preached a
sacred truth. He seemed another Luther. I forgot
everything but the man; then, glancing round, I saw that
his magnetism was holding these thousands as one.
Of course I was ripe for this experience. I was a man of
thirty-two, weary of disgust and disillusionment, a
wanderer seeking a cause; a patriot without a channel for
his patriotism, a yearner after the heroic without a hero.
The intense will of the man, the passion of his sincerity
Hitler was a scourge who would bring disgrace to
Germany
Hitler had strong ideas but did not inspire strong
support from Germans.
Hitler was a charismatic leader who appealed to
the German people.
Hitler had the ability to influence some people, but
not true German patriots.
Answer:
the answer is 100 percent c
Explanation:
good luck
Answer:
C is indeed correct
Why did the Texans not want Sam Houston as their general?
There is no concrete evidence to suggest that Texans did not want Sam Houston as their general. He was a respected figure with previous political and military experience, and he delivered a crucial victory for Texas at the Battle of San Jacinto. After the revolution, he was elected as the first president of the Lone Star Republic.
Explanation:There is no historical evidence to suggest that Texans did not want Sam Houston as their general. Houston was a revered figure in Texas history who played a crucial role in the state's fight for independence from Mexico. Prior to his leadership of Texas's military, Houston had been a congressman and governor of Tennessee, demonstrating a wealth of political and military experience.
Throughout the Texan Revolution, under Houston's leadership, the Texas military faced numerous challenges and setbacks, including costly defeats at Goliad and the Alamo. Despite this, Houston was remembered positively for his brilliant victory at the Battle of San Jacinto, where he surprised Santa Anna's Mexican forces and effectively ended the war.
Furthermore, post-revolution, Houston went on to serve as the first elected president of the fledgling Lone Star Republic, further indicating his standing and respect among fellow Texans. Any initial reservations about his leadership, therefore, would likely be the result of complex social, political, and military factors within the stressful context of a revolutionary conflict.
Learn more about Sam Houston here:https://brainly.com/question/18933221
#SPJ12
What was an argument made against the military draft during the Vietnam
War?
O
A. It forced conscientious objectors to fight.
O
B. It continued the practice of segregation.
O
C. It had an unfair impact on poorer citizens.
O
D. It kept African Americans from serving.
SUBMIT
Answer:
(C) It had an unfair impact on poorer citizens.
Explanation:
Many of the American citizens drafted into the war came from poor and working-class families - in fact, the number was around 80% of them from the 2.5 million who were drafted. Since many of them do not have an option to pursue higher education, or find worthwhile jobs, these men decided to join the military instead, since they would receive food, a place to stay, and even a pension after they are finished serving.
what would have happened if the natives never taught the americans about agriculture?
If thee Natives did not taught the Americans about agriculture the colonies would have failed, the conquests would have been delayed, and the zones of influence would probably not be the same as they were.
Explanation:
When the Europeans settlers arrived in the Americas, they struggled. Despite the first colonies having very small populations, even they were not able to sustain themselves, especially when it came to food sources. The Native Americans played a big role in helping the European settlers to survive, as initially they gave them just about enough food so that they can survive, and after that taught them about agriculture in those conditions.
If the Native Americans did not helped the European settlers though, the history and development of the Americas would have been different for sure. The colonies would have simply failed, and maybe the European nations would have been discouraged to send many more expeditions. Having better technology and military equipment, the Europeans would have come back in the Americas, and eventually would have conquered the lands they did, but the political map would have probably been much different. On the ''maybe list'' we can have:
larger and stronger Native American communitiesNative American statesdifferent zones of influence of the European powersa mestizo race in North America, and maybe not in South Americadifferent countries than we see nowadaysLearn more about the Native Americans https://brainly.com/question/10956281
#learnwithBrainly
4. Congress is notoriously slow at acting on most
legislation in each session. Consider the first steps in making a law. Which
step would you eliminate to speed up the process? Why?
Usually for making the bill into law takes the following steps:
INTRODUCTION AND REFERRAL TO COMMITTEE. COMMITTEE HEARINGS AND REPORTS. DEBATE AND VOTE ON THE HOUSE FLOOR. SENATE ACTION. RESOLVING DIFFERENCES. CONSIDERATION BY THE PRESIDENT.If to remove a step in order to make the process i would choose to remove the resolving differences as already there has been a debate regarding the the bill and the voting has been done so what the motive of resolving differences it only increases the time in making other person from the house in their favor and this takes a lot of time.
If one had to choose a step to eliminate to speed up the process, it might be the committee consideration and markup step.
This step is often where legislation can stall due to lengthy discussions, hearings, and revisions. By streamlining or eliminating this step, bills could potentially move more quickly to a vote by the full chamber.
To elaborate, the legislative process typically includes the following steps:
1. Introduction of the bill in either the House of Representatives or the Senate.
2. Referral to the appropriate committee(s) for consideration.
3. Committee action, which may include hearings, expert testimony, and markup sessions where amendments are proposed and the bill is debated.
4. Reporting the bill out of committee, possibly with amendments, to the full chamber.
5. Floor debate and consideration, including the opportunity for members to propose additional amendments.
6. Voting by the full chamber on the proposed legislation.
7. If passed, the bill is sent to the other chamber, where it goes through a similar process.
8. If both chambers pass the same version of the bill, it is sent to the President for approval or veto.
Each of these steps serves a purpose in the democratic process, allowing for input from various stakeholders, experts, and the public, as well as ensuring that legislation is carefully scrutinized before becoming law. However, the committee consideration and markup step is particularly time-consuming and can be subject to delays or obstruction. By either streamlining this step, perhaps by limiting the number of hearings or the time for debate, or bypassing it altogether in certain cases, the legislative process could be expedited.
It is important to note that such a change could have significant implications for the quality and transparency of legislation, as well as for the representation of minority views. Committees play a crucial role in refining bills and ensuring that they are publicly vetted, and skipping this step could lead to less informed decision-making and potentially less democratic outcomes. Therefore, while eliminating or modifying the committee step could speed up the legislative process, it would also require careful consideration of the potential consequences.
The Declaration of Independence (1776) has had a major influence on peoples throughout the world because it
provides justification for revolting against unjust governments
guarantees universal suffrage
establishes a basic set of laws for every nation
describes the importance of a strong central government
Answer:
The correct answer is the first option: The Declaration of Independence (1776) has had a major influence on peoples throughout the world because it provides justification for revolting against unjust governments.
Explanation:
It was a very important event in a global scale as the concepts of equality and freedom were promoted as a pillar of individual law. This fact happened when Europe was shaken by the Enlightenment, which questioned the divine right, over which the absolute monarchies had legitimized their political power.
The independence of the United States of America is one of the most important events in modern history: not only because it served as an example to the Latin American colonies that also aspired to their liberation, but, fundamentally, by the role that The country of Washington plays in the destinations of the world in contemporary times.
The French and Indian War was a war between
A
the French and the British only.
B
the French and the Native Americans.
C
the French with their Native American allies and the British.
D
the French with their Native American allies and the British with their colonists and Native American allies.
Answer:
It's D I think!
Explanation:
Although I may be wrong, the Native Americans sided with both British and French
i think its c because the french , the native Americans , & the british colonists were the main combatants of the French and Indian War
What was the main purpose of the Freedman's Bureau?
to punish former Confederate officers
to help the planter class regain its control over society
to administer loyalty oaths to African Americans
to help black and white war refugees
The main purpose of the Freedman's Bureau is to help black and white war refugees.
to help black and white war refugees
Explanation:
Freedman's Bureau was established by congress to help millions of black and white slaves after the civil war. They provide food, shelter, funds to the slaves.They also provide clothing, schools, medical to the slaves.
They solved their day to day problems. A certificate for marriage also provided for the slaves by the Freedman's Bureau. The main success is to make the slaves economically independent.
Answer:To help black and white war refugees.
Explain how World War 1 led to the rise of modernism
Answer:
Among the factors that shaped modernism were the development of modern industrial societies and the rapid growth of cities, followed by the horror of World War I. ... Modernist ideals pervaded art, architecture, literature, religious faith, philosophy, social organization, activities of daily life, and even the sciences.
Explanation:
lumenlearning.com
Answer:
The factors that led to the rise of modernism was rapid development of cities and industrial societies.
Explanation:
In the late 19th century Modernism is a movement of Modernism began. It affected many aspects of modern culture, from arts to business to social commentary. However, it is most often viewed in relation to the modernist literary movement, a branch of a wider philosophical movement
some of the factors that led to modernism were the rapid growth of cities and development of modern industrial societies , with the horrible past caused by World War I,Modernism was an utopian vision based on societies and human life and a belief in moving forward, and progress
Why was Mussolini able to take control of Italy???
Final answer:
Benito Mussolini rose to power by exploiting Italy's post-WWI economic and social turmoil, denouncing the Treaty of Versailles, and using his fascist Blackshirts to suppress opposition. Mussolini's promises of order and greatness, backed by force, led the king to appoint him as prime minister in 1922 to prevent a feared communist uprising. He then created a dictatorship, ended democracy, and pursued an aggressive policy of state control.
Explanation:
Benito Mussolini's Rise to Power
After World War I, Italy was in a state of economic, social, and political turmoil. Benito Mussolini capitalized on the nation's discontent following the disappointing outcomes of the Treaty of Versailles. His Fascist ideology and criticism of the existing government resonated with many Italians who felt betrayed and were seeking a restoration of national pride and stability.
In 1919, Mussolini began to gain prominence by denouncing the Treaty of Versailles. He tapped into the fears of economic downfall and communist revolution, positioning himself and his Fascist Party as a bulwark against chaos. By forming the Blackshirts, squads of loyal followers, Mussolini instilled fear and used violence to suppress opposition. Mussolini's fascist movement, which promised a return to greatness, appealed to various social classes, from the lower middle class to wealthy industrialists and landowners.
Through manipulations and outright terror, Mussolini was able to win a parliamentary majority in 1924. He subsequently eliminated elections, creating a dictatorship. His regime focused on industrial development and dismantling labor unions to control the workforce. The king of Italy, looking to prevent communist uprisings and civil conflict, appointed Mussolini as prime minister in 1922 after the 'March on Rome', a massive Fascist demonstration. The era of Italian democracy was effectively ended as Mussolini took on the title of 'Il Duce' and pursued a totalitarian state under the banner of 'All within the state, none outside the state, none against the state'.
What is one reason document a would be a reliable source to understand what happened when moctezuma met cortes?
The reason is because Document A is the primary source written to the king.
Explanation:
Document A is said to be reliable source which helped to understand what had actually happened when Moctezuma had met Cortes. This was considered to be a reliable source because this was the primary source which was written to the king Charles V.
Because it was a primary source, it was obviously a reliable source. This document was a letter written to the king which described the meeting of the two.
Document A would likely be a reliable source to understand what happened when Moctezuma met Cortes because it is a primary account written by Hernán Cortés himself. As a firsthand witness, Cortés' perspective provides direct information about the encounter, even though it may be biased.
Being a primary source written by Hernán Cortés in 1519, this document offers an immediate, firsthand account of the events as they unfolded. Primary sources like these are invaluable for historians because they provide detailed descriptions and insights that secondary sources might lack.
Cortés’ letters to King Charles V of Spain contained purposeful narratives meant to justify his actions and conquests, making them a strategic blend of fact and self-serving propaganda. While the bias is evident, these documents still contain genuine observations about Indigenous people and their responses to the Spaniards' arrival.
Using this document, historians can cross-reference the recorded events and reactions with other contemporary accounts to build a more complete and nuanced understanding of the meeting between Moctezuma and Cortés. This comparison helps balance out any exaggerations or unfounded claims made by Cortés in his writings.
what does the suffix -ix men in the word optimist
The suffix -ist in the word "optimist" means one who does or believes something. Option (A) is correct.
What do you mean by optimist?The person who practices the study of optimism is referred to as an optimist.
In linguistics, a suffix is a word affix which are added at the end of the word and gives it meaning, it carries grammatical or lexical information.
The two forms of derivational suffixes are Class-changing and class-maintaining suffixes. -ist is a class maintaining suffix.
In the nouns ending with -ism, which is the case of optimism, pessimism, traditionalism, etc. when the suffix -ist is replacing -ism it is used to speak of a person who practices the noun and what it is referring to. In the case of an optimist, it refers to someone who lives with optimism.
Therefore, Option (A) is correct.
Learn more about Optimism, here;
https://brainly.com/question/3603447
#SPJ2
Your question is incorrect and incomplete, the correct question is;
What does the suffix -ist mean in optimist?
A.one who does or believes something
B.one who shows a trait or ability
C.one who fights conviction or principle
D.one who has imagination or inner vision
How did Americans react to the British searches
Answer:
The King and Parliament believed they had the right to tax the colonies. They decided to require several kinds of taxes from the colonists to help pay for the French and Indian War. ... Other laws, such as the Townsend Acts, passed in Page 2 1767, required the colonists to pay taxes on imported goods like tea.
Explanation:
I hope this helps
Americans reacted to British searches with anger and resistance. This led to protests, boycotts, and eventually the American Revolution.
Explanation:Americans reacted to the British searches with a mixture of anger and resistance. The searches, conducted under British policies such as the Quartering Act and the Stamp Act, were seen as violations of American rights and freedoms. This led to protests, boycotts, and eventually the American Revolution.
For example, the Boston Tea Party in 1773 was a direct response to British searches on American ships and the imposition of taxes. It was a symbolic act of resistance against British authority and sparked further outrage among colonists.
Overall, the American reaction to British searches was a key factor in uniting the colonists against British rule and ultimately leading to the fight for independence.
Learn more about American reaction to British searches here:https://brainly.com/question/33862734
#SPJ3
We’re the 1950s happy times ??
Answer:
Not for all and much of America was still segregated. When measured against the 1930's Great Depression, the world war of the 1940's and the strife of the 1960's, and the malaise of the 1970's, the 1950's were happy times
Explanation:
Why were Native Americans so eager to engage in the enslavement of other Indians before 1750?
Answer:
Explanation:
Native Americans used slavery as a way of strategy in order to obtain freedom. They used to be whipped, tattooed, beaten, starved, etc. But once a person was enslaved, they had certain privileges and some kind of freedom. Men were protecting their owners, women would marry someone from the tribe and they would get a Hämäläinen title. Children would be adopted. Once they endured many ways of trauma and humiliation, they would achieve attain quasi -- status of freedom. Their children would be Comanches. The enslavement was over in 1850 and tribes decided to form a union and work together because Americans removed them from their own lands.
According to Islamic faith , why is Muhammad known as the prophet
Answer:
There are multiple prophets in islam so I don't really know what you are really asking here.
Explanation:
But Muhammad is the last prophet and therefore, the most well known. Hope I helped a bit.
What is the basic difference between autocracy,
erence between autocracy, oligarchy, and theocracy? How are they similar?
Answer:
The three types of government are quite different from each other.
Explanation:
Autocracy is a type of government in which only one person rules the government. Citizens cannot vote in an autocratic type of government.
Whereas, oligarchy is the type in which government is run by a few rich and wealthy people.
Theocracy is a type in which God or a divine power is believed to be supreme and can be ruled by any government.
The similarity between autocracy and oligarchy is that citizens cannot vote on both the governments.