What happened to Russia as a result of WWI? How did WWI cause a change in Russia's government?

Final answer:

The descriptions provided by the author illustrate that the Franks and others in the annex were living in constant fear, underlining the dangers of being discovered by the German authorities.

Explanation:

In the descriptions provided by the author about the conditions in the annex where the Frank family hid during the Holocaust, the emphasis is placed on the constant fear and danger they were living under. This is exemplified by the references to the risks of being discovered by the German authorities, the reliance on Dutch friends for survival needs, and the grim fates that awaited those who were caught. Therefore, the most accurate answer to the question about the author's emphasis would be that the Franks were living in fear in the annex.

Answer:

The Watergate scandal

Explanation:

Although Nixon had several achievements during his term, he is, perhaps, best remembered for being accused of being involved in the Watergate Scandal, an event that increased American's skepticism about government and that rocked his administration.

Such event was the scandal resulting from the arrest of five burglars in the office of the Democratic National Committee in June 1972 that were connected to President Richard Nixon’s reelection campaign. The burglars had been caught wiretapping phones and stealing documents.

Afterward, the President came to be in trouble with justice for trying to cover the crime and the documents, so, in order to avoid impeachment, he soon decided to resign from office.

100 grams is equal to 0.1 kilograms (kg) because there are 1000 grams in 1 kg.

To answer the question, 100 grams is equivalent to 0.1 kilograms (kg). This conversion is based on the fact that 1 kg equals 1000 grams. If we divide 100 grams by the number of grams in a kilogram, we get:

100 grams / 1000 grams per kg = 0.1 kg.

It's important to note that the prefix 'kilo-' means one thousand, which is why 1 kilogram is equal to 1000 grams. Remembering this fact can help you easily convert between grams and kilograms when needed.

Answer:

The Fearless Five infiltrated the Trippenhuis Museum in Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Explanation:

The Trippenhuis Museum that is situated in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, is one of the world's most famous museums. The painting named 'The Night Watch' mentioned in the question is the main attraction of this musueum. The painting was made by the Dutch painter named Rembrandt van Rijn who is regarded as the greatest figure in the history of Dutch visual art.

After the Bolsheviks overthrew the provisional government, the new government's true power rested in a council headed by Lenin. In early October, Lenin persuaded the Bolshevik Party to create an instant rebellion against the Provisional Government. The leaders of Bolshevik knew it was of the most important act to do. The Red Guards or the armed workforces and the further rebellion groups moved in the night of Nov. 6 to Nov. 7 under Soviet's Military Revolutionary Committee’s orders. Many people of the Red Guard captured the Winter Palace. The Provisional Government had formally overthrown. V. I. Lenin, the Bolsheviks leader, broadcasted his will to build the socialism in Russia. The new government prepared up of Soviets and commanded by the Bolsheviks. 

The answer to this question is, A. Encourage cultural pride. :)

The timeline reflects the process of campaign finance reform in the U.S., from the establishment of the FEC in 1975, through the passing of the BCRA in 2002, to the Supreme Court's decision in Citizens United v. FEC in 2010.

The timeline reflects the process of campaign finance reform in the United States. In 1975, the Federal Election Commission (FEC) was established to enforce campaign finance laws. Despite this, political parties and action committees discovered loopholes to donate large sums.

This led to the introduction of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA) or McCain-Feingold Act in 2002, which imposed restrictions on donations to political parties. However, in 2010, the Supreme Court's controversial ruling on Citizens United v. FEC removed corporate spending limits, arguing that the BCRA violated a corporation's free speech rights.

https://brainly.com/question/29885885

#SPJ3

Correct answer is:

A member cannot endure different place in the United States government for which he gets any sort of pay or compensation, both directly or indirectly. Every state has one vote in Congress, irrespective of how many representatives are assigned. Delegates' liberation of speech is preserved while they are working in Congress.

Under the Articles of Confederation, Virginia would have one, and Delaware would have one.

As the Article of Confederation illustrates, every state acquires one vote, despite its intensity, so that the authority each state endures are equal. It also acknowledged an unfastened association of the states, which forthwith determined to be vulnerable, and that a distinct plan had to be pulled out.

Further Explanation:

One of the significant problems representatives brought to the Convention had to determine the vote share each state should possess. Under the Articles of Confederation, every state had one vote, notwithstanding of size. At the Convention, every state had the individual vote.

Some delegates, especially those from more populous states, consider it unethical for every state to have an identical number of votes. They believed the states’ votes should be apportioned according to people, with the more populated states possessing more authority than the less populated states. That way, the people inside the states would be similar. The subsequent statistics manifest the colonies’ having differing communities.

Learn more:

1. What was one effect of the great society programs? https://brainly.com/question/7244356

2. Why was the supreme court’s ruling important in gitlow v. New York? https://brainly.com/question/1908150

Answer details  

Grade: High school

Subject: History

Chapter: Article of Confederation

Keywords:

Communities, votes share, delegates, populous, representatives, vulnerable , Virginia , Delaware , convention , confederation,

Super PACs are a major factor in elections as they constitute independent political committees that support a candidate with donation from union, companies or even individuals. These donations can be unlimited and anonymous. These groups contribute to a candidate in an indirect way such as by running favorable ads about a candidate.  Ads sponsored by super PACs are usually negative. In January 2010, Supreme Court Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission  decided that the government cannot restrict the spending of corporations, unions and other groups for political campaigns. Thus, that decision led to a great wave of unlimited amounts of money to be invested on political campaigns.

The Supreme Court's Citizens United v. FEC decision in 2010 led to the creation of Super PACs, which can raise and spend unlimited amounts of money in U.S. elections. This has significantly increased unregulated, often untraceable, campaign funding (dark money), and raised concerns about the influence of wealthy donors on politics and policy.

The creation of Super PACs has significantly influenced U.S. election campaigns beginning in 2010. This change is largely attributed to the Supreme Court's decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, which allowed for unlimited spending by corporations, unions, and individuals on independent political campaigning. Super PACs, being independent expenditure-only committees, can raise unlimited funds from various sources, including dark money, where the donor's identity remains undisclosed. This has led to a dramatic increase in untraceable campaign funding and has been a point of controversy as it is seen to give affluent donors and entities more influence over elections and public policy.

Notably, in states like Texas, unlimited donations to campaigns must be disclosed. However, the Citizens United ruling meant that corporations could contribute large sums to political action committees such as Super PACs without direct transparency. This has resulted in a surge of funding in election cycles, raising concerns over the potential for conflicts of interest and the sway of money in political decisions.

Super PACs are prohibited from donating directly to candidates or parties but are free to engage in independent political expenditures in support or opposition to political candidates. The rise of these organizations has altered the landscape of campaign financing, increasing the importance of financial resources in the political arena and raising questions about the balance of power and democratic processes.

The Anti-Federalists favored stronger state governments.

Further Explanation:

The Anti-Federalists were a political faction (group) that formed during the Constitutional Convention. Originally the goal of this convention was to fix America's first constitution, the Articles of Confederation. However, after delegates realized that this would be near impossible, the goal was to create a new US Constitution. One of the biggest debates at this convention revolved around whether or not the new constitution would have a strong or weak central government.,

Anti-Federalists favored a weak central government and stronger state governments. Many individuals from this group, like Thomas Jefferson, wanted stronger state governments due to their fear of a strong central government becoming tyrannical. These fears were rooted in logic, as one of the most significant factors in America' decision to declare independence was a central government that abused their power.

Federalists, on the other hand, wanted a strong federal government. This is due to the fact that America failed miserably under the Articles of Confederation (which had a weak central government). Ultimately, these sides would develop compromises that helped to shape the creation of the US Constitution we still use today.

Learn More:

Development of the US Constitution- https://brainly.com/question/1566412

Key Details:

Topic: American History, Constitutional History

Grade Level: 7-12

Keywords: Anti-Federalists, Federalists, Constitutional Convention

Anti-Federalists supported representative, as opposed to direct, democracy, weaker state governments, a strong central government, indirect election of government officials, and longer-term restrictions for officeholders. Option (a) is correct.

Since they associated British oppression with strong governments, many Anti-Federalists favored a limited central authority. Others wished to promote democracy and feared that the wealthy would control a powerful government. They believed that the new federal government was receiving an excessive amount of power from the states.

The national power grab was opposed by the Anti-Federalists. They supported localized, constrained national authority, similar to that provided by the Articles of Confederation.

Learn more about democracy, here;

https://brainly.com/question/30466950

#SPJ6

Answer:

Call 911 as she is bleeding profusely.

Try tending to the injury herself. (If there's nobody that can help her, she needs to apply pressure.)

Get help from an adult or a teacher.    

Reach out to peers to help treat the injury.

The correct answer is D. Thomas Cole

Cole was originally from England and emigrated to the United States in 1801. He began painting portraits after receiving training from an itinerant artist. He inspired the Hudson Rives School group of painters that focused on the American landscape

The proclamation reflected the people of the Philippines in 1898 as There were strong nationalist feelings in the Philippines. Option C is correct.

“In April 1898, the Spanish-American War broke out over Spain’s brutal suppression of a rebellion in Cuba. The first in a series of decisive U.S. victories occurred on May 1, 1898, when the U.S. Asiatic Squadron under Commodore George Dewey annihilated the Spanish Pacific fleet at the Battle of Manila Bay in the Philippines.

Therefore the correct answer is option C.

Learn more about Philippines in 1898 here,

https://brainly.com/question/1122954

#SPJ2

The relative roles of the many Hindu gods are expressed by the statement A, highlighting the importance of Brahma, Vishnu, and Shiva as fundamental aspects of Hinduism. Therefore, the correct option is A. While Hindus worship many gods, three of them Brahma, Vishnu, and Shiva are the most important. They represent the fundamental aspects of Hinduism.

The correct statement expressing the relative roles of the many Hindu gods is A. While Hindus worship many gods, three of them – Brahma, Vishnu, and Shiva – are the most important. They represent the fundamental aspects of Hinduism. This statement highlights the significance of Brahma, Vishnu, and Shiva as primary deities in Hinduism, without diminishing the importance of other gods.

https://brainly.com/question/31562224

#SPJ1

The correct statement is that Hindus primarily worship Brahma the Creator, Vishnu the Preserver, and Shiva the Destroyer, who are considered the most important gods representing the core aspects of Hinduism, with various manifestations and divine counterparts. A. While Hindus worship many gods, three of them Brahma, Vishnu, and Shiva are the most important. They represent the fundamental aspects of Hinduism.

The statement that expresses the relative roles of the many Hindu gods correctly is: "While Hindus worship many gods, three of them Brahma, Vishnu, and Shiva are the most important. They represent the fundamental aspects of Hinduism."

This is because in Hinduism, there is a belief in a cycle of creation, preservation, and destruction that is represented by these three deities Brahma (the Creator), Vishnu (the Preserver), and Shiva (the Destroyer). Each deity has various manifestations and avatars. Vishnu is known for his incarnations such as Rama and Krishna, and each major deity also has a divine counterpart, for example, Shiva's wife Parvati, who is revered as well.

Answer:

Protection for individual rights was lacking.

Explanation:

Antifederalists wanted the Constitution to be amended to include protection for individuals’ natural rights.

The Holocaust is remembered to educate about past atrocities, honor those who showed humanity during dark times, and to prevent future genocides. Memorials, educational efforts, and acknowledgment of past events help ensure the world remains vigilant against similar horrors. The remembrance also aids in understanding the geopolitical changes post-World War II, especially the establishment of Israel.

People from around the world are making sure the Holocaust is not forgotten to prevent the reoccurrence of such atrocities. The Holocaust was a systematic, government-organized persecution and murder of 6 million Jews and other targeted groups by Nazi Germany and its collaborators. The world has witnessed other genocides, such as in Armenia, Bosnia, Rwanda, Cambodia, and even as recently as 2016 in Syria, which emphasizes the importance of remembering the Holocaust to stop history from repeating itself.

Memorialization efforts, such as the US Holocaust Memorial Museum, and educational initiatives work towards ensuring every generation is aware of the genocide. These efforts are complemented by the celebration of the righteous individuals who exhibited courage, kindness, and decency amidst such horror, serving as an inspiration for moral conduct today. Finally, global citizenship demands awareness and understanding of the roots of genocide to prevent future occurrences.

The geopolitical effects of the Holocaust have proven to be significant. The establishment of Israel as a Jewish homeland and the shift in Jewish life to the United States and Israel have had long-term consequences for geopolitics, especially in the Middle East. Thus, keeping the memory of the Holocaust alive is also pivotal to understanding contemporary global relations.

Furthermore, the narrative of the Holocaust has shifted over time. The early focus was on resistance, like the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising, while the full scope of the systematic genocide became clearer later. Bearing witness to the testimonies of survivors and acknowledging the dark capabilities of human organizations is central to the conscientious remembrance of the Holocaust.

People around the world ensure the Holocaust is not forgotten to honor the memory of victims, prevent future atrocities, and promote tolerance and understanding.

The Holocaust represents one of the darkest chapters in human history, where millions of innocent lives were systematically exterminated by the Nazi regime during World War II. By remembering the Holocaust, individuals and societies pay tribute to the victims and survivors, preserving their stories and honoring their resilience in the face of unimaginable suffering.

Additionally, keeping the memory of the Holocaust alive serves as a poignant reminder of the consequences of hatred, bigotry, and intolerance, highlighting the importance of combating discrimination and promoting human rights.

Moreover, by studying and reflecting on the Holocaust, people can gain valuable insights into the dangers of unchecked power, propaganda, and indifference, fostering a commitment to justice, empathy, and solidarity in the pursuit of a more just and compassionate world. Therefore, ensuring that the Holocaust is not forgotten is a vital means of preserving historical truth, promoting moral responsibility, and safeguarding against the recurrence of such atrocities in the future.

Answer: A. The dangerous and aggressive expansion of totalitarian nations

Explanation:

The rise of totalitarian nations and dictators such as Hitler, Mussolini, Franco, and Stalin, was a fundamental element in starting WW2. Totalitarian governments gave its leaders enough power to seek belligerent purposes without resistance from their populations.

This allowed them, specially in the case of Japan and Nazi Germany, to pursue aggressive invasions that eventually started the war.

Final answer:

The primary cause of World War II was the aggressive expansion of totalitarian nations, led by Adolf Hitler's Nazi Germany, accompanied by Italy and Japan. The accumulation of tensions due to the rise of fascism, economic instability, and nationalist ambitions led to the outbreak of the war. America's involvement was prompted by Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor.

Explanation:

The key cause of World War II was A. The dangerous and aggressive expansion of totalitarian nations. Adolf Hitler's vision of a vastly expanded German empire was a driving force behind the war. Hitler's ideology of Nazism and the aggressive actions of Germany, along with its Axis allies Italy and Japan, led to the outbreak of war. This expansionist policy led to the annexation of territories such as Austria and the Sudetenland, ultimately culminating in the invasion of Poland in 1939, which triggered World War II.

Moreover, the rise of fascism in countries like Italy, the pursuit of an expanded empire by Japan, and the overall failure of democracy to manage the crisis of the Great Depression contributed to the war. Notably, Japan's invasion of Manchuria in 1931 signalled the broader ambitions of militaristic expansion that paralleled the Nazi pursuit of Lebensraum. The interwar period witnessed increasing nationalism, militarism, and the rise of authoritarian governments that challenged the existing democratic order and ultimately led to conflict.

The United States entered World War II following the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941, which was a direct consequence of the expansionist policies of the Axis powers.

An example of a great primary source for a person presenting a paper on the 2004 presidential election would be a diary entry by a person involved in the campaign or voting process, such as option A, 'a diary entry by a person who lived in the period under discussion.' This would provide firsthand insights and experiences from the time of the election.

Primary sources are firsthand accounts created during the time under study. They offer invaluable insights into a historical event and can include diaries, speeches, interviews, or original research. When examining the 2004 presidential election, a diary entry from someone directly involved or present during the events would illuminate the atmosphere, strategies, and public perceptions in real-time. These sources are distinguished from secondary sources, like textbooks or academic journal articles, which interpret and analyze primary documents after the fact. For the 2004 election, campaign materials, voting records, and direct recordings of the debates would also qualify as primary sources, allowing researchers to construct a detailed narrative of the political climate and decision-making processes of the period.

Answer:

c. Working conditions became increasingly unbearable.

Explanation:

According to a different source, these are the options that come with this question:

a. Their jobs were gradually taken over by men.

b. The advances in mechanization decreased the need for unskilled labor.

c. Working conditions became increasingly unbearable.

d. Too many years working in the mills made them undesirable marriage partners.

The main reason why these girls decided to resign from working in the mills and return to their family farms in the 1840s was that the working conditions at the mills became increasingly unbearable. As more immigrants arrived, and more workers moved to cities, competition for work became more intense. Factories were able to decrease wages, increase hours and be careless about safety standards and continue to get employees. Therefore, the conditions in factories and mills became worse, which forced many people to return to their farms.