World War II led to significant changes for American women, opening up job opportunities as men left for war, symbolized by Rosie the Riveter. Despite post-war pushback, the experience laid the groundwork for future equality movements, changing societal views on women's roles.
World War II had a profound effect on American women, shaping their roles both during and after the conflict. As large numbers of men were drafted into military service, the demand for wartime production surged, creating opportunities for women to enter the workforce in unprecedented numbers.
Approximately 1 million women began working in jobs previously inaccessible to them due to gender barriers.
These jobs included industrial labor, which saw women stepping into roles such as operating heavy machinery and working on assembly lines, embodying the iconic image of Rosie the Riveter. Despite being a driving force in America's economic growth during the war, women often faced lower wages compared to their male counterparts.
Postwar America witnessed a reversal for many of these women, as returning soldiers reclaimed their jobs and women were expected to step back into traditional domestic roles.
However, the wartime work experience left a lasting impact, making the notion of full-time employment and careers for women much more viable.
This set the stage for the later feminist movements of the 1960s and 1970s, which fought for gender equality in the workplace and beyond.
The "middle class" that rose to power in europe after the middle ages was most associated with which occupation?
In which region did most of the damage from the dust bowl occur?
The dust bowl was catastrophic, it affected many areas but where it affected the most was Texas and Oklahoma. It barley touched New Mexico and Colorado.
Hope this helps! :)
3. Briefly explain how Social Darwinism contributed to European imperialism. (2 points)
Which of the following is a reason why the United Nations had a more successful start than the League of Nations?
The United Nations was accepted by all the people of Europe.
The United Nations wanted to help spread capitalism.
The United Nations wanted to help rebuild Europe.
The United Nations had the support of most Americans.
The United Nations had the support of most Americans.
Discuss the search for the northwest passage. explain why they were looking for it and why that exploration was important.
A reserved state power is the ability to print money.
A.) True
B.) False
What can you infer about what might have been western european concerns at the outset of the invasion of south korea?
Western European concerns at the outset of the invasion of South Korea were focused on the potential spread of communism and the security implications for the world.
Explanation:At the outset of the invasion of South Korea, Western European concerns were primarily centered around the potential spread of communism and the implications for global security. The United States was concerned about maintaining its credibility as a defender of democratic nations and preventing the domino effect of communist victories. Additionally, the Korean situation occurred shortly after the communist takeover of neighboring China, which further heightened concerns about the expansion of communism in the region.
What is one of the most important advantages of a free market?
It encourages growth.
It protects the less fortunate.
It is easy to regulate.
It revolves around the family.
The most important advantage of a free market as per the given options is that it encourages growth. Hence, option A is correct.
What is Free market?Free market, an unrestricted system of economic trade where taxes, quality control processes, quotas, tariffs, and other centralized government economic interventions either don't exist or are very low.
Modern civilizations can only attempt or approach this idea of efficient use of resources because the free market provides a standard that doesn't actually exist, and they can be categorized along a spectrum from low to high levels of control.
Given specific conditions, many economists believe that resource allocation inside a free market is Pareto-efficient, meaning that no person can be made stronger off without also making other people worse off.
Therefore, it concludes that option A is correct.
To know more about the free market:
https://brainly.com/question/13172440
#SPJ5
A critical advantage of a free market is its ability to stimulate economic growth through competition and consumer choice. However, a free market does not always protect the less fortunate and can sometimes be difficult to regulate.
Explanation:One of the most important advantages of a free market is that it encourages economic growth. In a free market, businesses compete with each other to provide better goods and services, which leads to technological advancements, innovation, and improvement in the standard of living.
Furthermore, consumers have the freedom to choose what they buy, and this competition and choice stimulate economic growth. However, it's not that a free market always protects the less fortunate, nor it’s easy to regulate as the workings of the market are largely left to supply and demand forces, which can sometimes lead to economic instability.
Learn more about free market advantage here:https://brainly.com/question/34075804
#SPJ6
The quote above presents the "clear and present danger" test, which can be used to limit a person's right to free speech. Why are rights guaranteed in the Constitution limited instead of absolute?
What was the most likely reason farmers were paid to plant less cotton in the early years of the great depression?
Answer:
C) to raise the price of cotton and increase each cotton farmer's income
*just took the test*
After the U.S refused to fund the Aswan dam Egypt’s government
Based on the photos you just saw, write two to three sentences describing what it was like to be a child in the Circleville, Ohio, Hooverville.
dirty living conditions
a lack of clothes
no playground or park
broken toys or no toys at all
a lack of adequate shoes or clothing
inadequate schools
Life for a child in the Hooverville of Circleville, Ohio, during the Great Depression was marked by economic hardship, labor, and lack of access to services such as education and healthcare. Despite these challenges, there was a sense of community and resilience.
Explanation:Based on the photos, being a child in the Circleville, Ohio, Hooverville was challenging. Life in Hooverville was marked by severe economic hardship due to the Great Depression. Children often had to help their parents in labor work, lacked access to proper education and healthcare, and lived in dwellings constructed from scrapped materials. Despite these adversities, the photos also depict a sense of community and resilience amongst the children and their families.
Learn more about Life in Hooverville here:https://brainly.com/question/34613441
#SPJ2
What were some pros and cons of supporting the Vietnam War?
Final answer:
Supporting the Vietnam War had pros and cons, such as preventing the spread of Communism and maintaining America's credibility, but also resulting in the loss of American lives and human rights violations.
Explanation:
The Vietnam War was a highly divisive conflict in the United States, and there were both pros and cons to supporting it. Some of the pros included the belief that the war was necessary to prevent the spread of Communism and maintain America's credibility on the world stage. Supporters argued that the US had made commitments to fight Communism and should honor them. Additionally, they believed in the domino theory, which suggested that if one country fell to Communism, others would follow. By opposing the war, they believed that America would lose its influence and power in the world.
However, there were also cons to supporting the war. Many critics argued that it was an unjust and unnecessary conflict that resulted in the loss of American lives. They questioned the government's justification for the war and believed that resources could be better used for domestic purposes. Critics also pointed out the human rights violations committed by US forces, such as the My Lai Massacre, which further undermined support for the war.
In summary, supporting the Vietnam War had pros and cons. Supporters believed it was necessary to prevent Communism and maintain America's credibility, while critics viewed it as an unjust and wasteful conflict.
Discuss the events of the Boston Massacre and the verdict of the jury. What happened on the night of March 5, 1770? Are the soldiers guilty or not guilty of murder?
The events of the Boston Massacre and the verdict of the jury was various colonist were killed and soldiers were charged.
What is Boston Massacre?The events of the massacre were very eventful as they over people who are dead and a riot were violent. there were various things that were being thrown at the people.
There there was several massacre and colonies that were being killed at that point in time. In this, the soldiers were being treated and prepared for the trial. Out of the six soldiers, there were two who were definitely found guilty and were charged with manslaughter.
Learn more about Boston Massacre, here:
https://brainly.com/question/5601348
#SPJ1
How did the scientific revolution change the way europeans viewed the universe and the place of human neings in it?
Why was an American victory at Saratoga important to the American cause?
A. France joined as a British ally in the war.
B. Britain brought additional troops to America.
C. It persuaded France and Spain to become allies.
Final answer:
The American victory at Saratoga was crucial as it convinced France and later Spain to support the American revolutionaries, providing them with vital military assistance and resources, leading to a turning point in the Revolutionary War.
Explanation:
An American victory at Saratoga was important to the American cause because it persuaded France and Spain to become allies with the American revolutionaries. This victory was a major turning point in the Revolutionary War. The French recognition of American independence and their subsequent military alliance provided the Americans with much-needed military support. This included gunpowder, money, soldiers, and naval forces, which all proved decisive in the defeat of Great Britain. France also provided experienced military leaders like the Marquis de Lafayette, who became an invaluable asset to General Washington.
The victory at Saratoga boosted American morale and is often considered the turning point in the Revolutionary War. It forced Britain to divert attention and resources to other theaters, such as the West Indies and Europe, thereby reducing their focus on suppressing the American rebellion. Ultimately, the increased global scope of the war due to French and later Spanish involvement imposed greater strain on British military and financial resources.
Additionally, the success at Saratoga laid the groundwork for further international support and acknowledgment of American independence, which was critical for sustaining the war effort against Britain's formidable military.
What was the outcome of the Korean War?
A.) Korea remained a divided country.
B.) The United States removed its troops from South Korea.
C.) Communism was halted in North Korea.
D.) The demilitarized zone at the 38th parallel was eliminated.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
How would the Marshall Plan prevent the spread of communism in Europe?
The Marshall Plan provided financial aid on the condition that the United States would act as adviser to the receiving nation's government.
The countries that received financial aid through the Marshall Plan were less likely to join the Communist Bloc.
The Marshall Plan required receiving nations to severely reduce trade with the Soviet Union and its satellite states.
The receiving nations under the Marshall Plan were strongly monitored by the United States and other Western Allies.
The correct answer is: "The countries that received financial aid through the Marshall Plan were less likely to join the Communist Bloc".
The Marshall Plan was an initiative launched by the US in 1948 to help the recovery of Western European countries after WWII. $ 12 billion were sent to rebuild those countries and to boost their economies by rebuilding factories, infrastructures, civil buildings, etc.
The US had adopted the containment strategy, a foreign affairs approach which focused on stopping the spread of communism worldwide. Therefore, rebuilding Western Europe under the influence of the US was beneficial because the Western European powers would side with the US and act as a barrier for containing communism, that was in fact suceeding on the Eastern regions of the continent.
Final answer:
The Marshall Plan was crucial in preventing the spread of communism in Europe by revitalizing economies with U.S. financial aid, demonstrating the benefits of capitalism over communism, and leading to the economic recovery of Western Europe which significantly reduced the appeal of communist ideologies.
Explanation:
The Marshall Plan was instrumental in preventing the spread of communism in Europe by providing extensive economic aid to war-torn nations, essentially rejuvenating their economies and thus reducing the appeal of communist ideals. The aid helped in the reconstruction of essential infrastructure and industries, preventing economic disarray which often led to the rise of communist parties. Additionally, it showcased the benefits of capitalism and democracy, making the Soviet-led communist approach less attractive.
By enforcing conditions such as the requirement for countries to purchase American goods, it not only bolstered the U.S. economy but also tied the recovery of European nations closely with the success of American capitalism. The rejection of the Marshall Plan by the Soviet Union and its satellite states further bifurcated Europe into economic and ideological spheres, thereby limiting the spread of communism to Western Europe.
The strategy of providing aid, modernizing economies, and requiring cooperation among recipient nations under the Marshall Plan effectively curbed the spread of communism by demonstrating the tangible benefits of a free-market economy, which contrasted starkly with the stagnant economies of the Eastern Bloc.
"jackson was mortally wounded by one of his own soldiers at the __________."
What did the growing popularity of Malcolm X, Black Power, and the Black Panthers show about the civil rights movement by 1965?
a. that it had failed to bring about any changes in the lives of African Americans
b. that many people were willing to participate in demonstrations
c. that whites had joined forces with blacks in the civil rights movement
d. that many African Americans had become impatient with King's cautious approach
Answer:
d. that many African Americans had become impatient with King's cautious approach
Explanation:
During the 1960's, several civil rights movements fought for Afro-American people's rights in the United States due to the high level of racism, discrimination, and segregation that Afro-American people had to face. Malcolm X was a leader of the movement Nation of Islam, he fiercely denounced the crimes that white Americans had committed against Afro-Americans and his opinions were labeled as extremist by his detractors. Black Panthers was a black nationalist, socialist, and revolutionary organization that defied police brutality in the United States against Afro-Americans. All these organizations adhere to the ideology known as Black Power. This movement went further than the movement led by Martin Luther King, which was more cautious in the fight for the freedom and rights of Afro-Americans. This fact showed that African Americans had become impatient with this cautious approach and wanted to get real results from this social struggle for their rights.
Refer to Explorations in Literature for a complete version of this speech. Which quotation from “What to the Slave Is the Fourth of July?” most accurately describes Frederick Douglass's viewpoint about celebrating the Fourth of July?
Final answer:
Frederick Douglass's speech "What to the Slave Is the Fourth of July?" portrays the celebration of the Fourth of July as ironic and painful for enslaved people, highlighting the nation's hypocrisy. A key quote from the speech emphasizes the gross injustice that the holiday reveals to slaves. Douglass challenged his audience to reconcile the nation's ideals with the reality of slavery.
Explanation:
Frederick Douglass's viewpoint about the Fourth of July, as expressed in his speech "What to the Slave Is the Fourth of July?", is one of profound irony and pain. He sees the celebration as a stark reminder of the hypocrisy inherent in a nation that proclaims liberty while continuing to uphold the institution of slavery. The speech emphasizes how the ideals of freedom and democracy celebrated on the Fourth of July do not apply to enslaved people, making the celebrations feel like a mockery to their suffering and lack of freedom.
One of the most poignant quotations that encapsulate Douglass's perspectives is found in his speech: "What, to the American slave, is your 4th of July? I answer; a day that reveals to him, more than all other days in the year, the gross injustice and cruelty to which he is the constant victim." This quote clearly reveals Douglass's critical stance on the disconnect between the values celebrated on Independence Day and the reality for slaves in America.
By delivering this speech, Douglass aimed to move his audience to recognize the contradiction between the nation’s founding principles and the continued existence of slavery, and to provoke action towards abolishing the institution altogether.
How many people were impacted int he armenian genocide?
Answer:
hey haley
Explanation:
The Armenian genocide refers to the physical annihilation of ethnic Armenian Christian people living in the Ottoman Empire from spring 1915 through autumn 1916. There were approximately 1.5 million Armenians living in the Empire. At least 664,000 and possibly as many as 1.2 million died during the genocide. Armenians call these events Medz Yeghern (the great crime) or Aghet (catastrophe).
The Armenian Genocide
The Armenian genocide refers to the physical annihilation of ethnic Armenian Christian people living in the Ottoman Empire from spring 1915 through autumn 1916.
The origin of the term genocide and its codification in international law have their roots in the mass murder of Armenians. Lawyer Raphael Lemkin, the coiner of the word and its later champion at the United Nations, repeatedly stated that early exposure to newspaper stories about Ottoman crimes against Armenians was key to his beliefs about the need for legal protection of groups. (In 1948, in part due to the tireless efforts of Lemkin, the UN approved the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.)
Ottoman authorities, supported by auxiliary troops and civilians, committed most of the murders of 1915-16. The government, controlled by the Committee of Union and Progress (CUP; also called the Young Turks), aimed to solidify Turkish Muslim dominance in the region of eastern Anatolia by eliminating the sizeable Armenian population there.
From 1915-16, the Ottomans killed large numbers of people in mass shootings; many others died during mass deportations due to starvation, dehydration, exposure, and disease. In addition, tens of thousands of Armenian children were forcibly removed from their families and converted to Islam.
What caused NATO and the United States to get involved in the Bosnian conflict?
Answer:
The practice of ethnic cleansing
Explanation:
How did whale industry affected African Americans?
What forms of protest did the colonists use to oppose British policies?
Nonviolent resistance
Rallies, pamphlets, and letter-writing
Direct attacks on British soldiers and sympathizers
According toPaine, why was independence “common sense”?
It is only natural for a colony to break away from its governing country.
Governments found colonies with the intention of making them independent.
It was the only rational course of action against an oppressive monarchy.,
just check
1. During the Vietnam War, African American soldiers were
not allowed to fight overseas.
often granted deferments to attend college.
becoming commissioned officers at a high rate.
more likely than others to serve in combat positions.
The president's authority to fill a government office or position in the executive branch and federal judiciary is known as
Franklin was opposed to the large german population in pennsylvania because __________.
help?
Why did China decide to open relations with the US after Nixon’s multiple attempts?
A) China wanted the US to invade the Korean peninsula and overthrow the government of South Korea
B) The US offered to stop trading with Japan so that Chinese goods would cost more on the world market
C) The US offered protection against an uprising in rural China
D) China’s increased conflict with the Soviet Union over territory led China to work with the US
What do you think are the potential positives and negatives to partisanship? Fill in the table with at least two positive and two negative examples.
I think that the positives of partisanship is that the incumbent political leader will have the (1) unwavering support from his cohorts with regards to the projects, programs or laws that he/she will be implementing (2) their aspirations and objectives are aligned which helps in catalyzing in the changes that they may want to implement in the government or administration and (3) its identity can endure simply because it is strengthened by affiliating itself to gender, ethnic, religious and racial groups thus promoting a connection to a party which eventually generates political stability and diminish political influence by independents or nonpartisans. On the downside, partisanship may (1) promote divisiveness especially if its advocacies are met with great opposition by the non-cohorts and (2) there will be bias especially if arguments are thrown against them which leads to the scrutiny of the opposing views at a greater degree just to refute the said argument.
Answer:
Positive:Partisanship ensures that representatives in the government will stick to the policies of their party.
Voters who support one side of the argument can be more assured that their officials will represent their beliefs. Negitave :Partisanship might lead to deadlock in the political process.
Voters who don’t agree with either party will not have a good alternative to look to.
Explanation: