Answer: Its purpose was to centralize the many information services of the United States government and create a single line of communication about the war to the American public.
Explanation:
I found it on Google.
How did World War I contribute to the rise of Adolf Hitler and the Nazi party in Germany
Answer:
it greatly weakened Germany and made many Germans wish for
stronger leadership
Explanation:
brainliest?
Which right was confirmed by the Tinker v. Des Moines School District
decision?
A. Freedom of press
B. Freedom from cruel punishment
C. Freedom of religion
D. Freedom of speech
Answer:
I think it's D
Explanation:
D- freedom of speech
a p e x
The declaration of Independence best reflects America strong believe in
Answer:
Equality and natural or God given right
Explanation:
In the eyes of God we are all equal and with that we all have God given rights that can't be taken away and to insure of that there is that government who are there to protect us of those rights.
What was the purpose of the open door
Answer:
Open Door policy, statement of principles initiated by the United States in 1899 and 1900 for the protection of equal privileges among countries trading with China and in support of Chinese territorial and administrative integrity. The statement was issued in the form of circular notes dispatched by U.S. Secretary of State John Hay to Great Britain, Germany, France, Italy, Japan, and Russia. The Open Door policy was received with almost universal approval in the United States, and for more than 40 years it was a cornerstone of American foreign policy in East Asia.
How did the Dred Scott decision heighten sectionalism and contribute to the Civil War?
Answer:
Sectionalism
Explanation:
Sectionalism. The Dred Scott case decision was one of the biggest reasons that the South seceded. While the South wanted to keep their slaves, the north wanted to set those slaves free and make them citizens. This led to rising tensions & finally led to the secession of the south.
Answer:
Sectionalism.
Explanation:
The Dred Scott case decision was one of the biggest reasons that the South seceded. While the South wanted to eep their slaves, the north wanted to set those slaves free and make them citizens. This led to rising tensions & finally led to he secession of the south.
Which fact supports the idea that renting is a good option for living in a place for a short period of time
Answer: Renting can be cheaper
Explanation:
Sometimes renting a place to live in is the best option when you've just moved out, it allows you to have a place to live and allows you to save up enough money to eventually buy and own a house
Renting is a good option for living in a place for a short period of time because it provides cheaper housing and flexibility.
Explanation:The fact that supports the idea that renting is a good option for living in a place for a short period of time is that renters tend to obtain 'cheaper' housing than what the market requires. Renting allows people to live in a place without the long-term financial commitment of purchasing a property. It is also ideal for individuals who need flexibility and may need to move frequently due to work or personal reasons.
Learn more about Renting as a short-term housing option here:https://brainly.com/question/30075540
#SPJ12
HELP PLEASE!!!!
How did the Edict of Milan, which was issued in 313 CE, affect the spread of Christianity?
It allowed Christianity to spread to Carthage and Jerusalem.
It allowed Christianity to spread outside of Europe by 600 CE.
It allowed Christianity to spread around the entire world by 600 CE.
It allowed Christianity to spread throughout the entire Roman Empire
The Edict of Milan, issued in 313 CE, legalized Christianity and ended state-sanctioned persecution, which allowed it to spread throughout the entire Roman Empire. It granted Christians legal rights and the means to build churches, significantly boosting the religion's growth. This decree marked a crucial turning point in Christian history.
The student asked, "How did the Edict of Milan, which was issued in 313 CE, affect the spread of Christianity?" The Edict of Milan, issued in 313 CE, granted religious toleration within the Roman Empire, which had significant implications for the spread of Christianity.
Firstly, by legalizing Christianity, the edict effectively ended state-sanctioned persecution of Christians, allowing them to practice their faith openly without fear of retribution. This increased the visibility and acceptance of Christianity throughout the Roman Empire.
Secondly, the edict returned previously confiscated property to Christians and restored their legal rights, empowering the Christian community to build churches and organize more effectively. This legitimacy led to a growth in the number of Christians and the building of Christian institutions.
Finally, the Edict of Milan allowed Christianity to spread throughout the entire Roman Empire because it established a precedent of religious tolerance, leading to Christianity's proliferation in urban centers and rural areas alike.
Overall, the Edict of Milan played a crucial role in the spread of Christianity by ensuring religious freedom and fostering the growth of Christian communities.
write a sentence explaining its significance
the 38th parallel
the domino theory
Which statement about Kwame Nkrumah and Jomo Kenyatta is not true?
A. both worked with political parties to bring freedom to their countries
B.Both became the leaders of their countries in later past power peacefully to successors
C.Both work to win independence from British rule
D. Both travel outside Africa to pursue education
Answer:
The correct answer is B. It is not true that both passed power peacefully to successors, as Jomo Kenyatta didn't, but on the contrary, he was an authoritarian ruler until his death.
Explanation:
Jomo Kenyatta was a Kenyan politician, president of the country from 1964 until his death in 1978.
He came from the Kikuyu tribe. He studied social anthropology in the United Kingdom at the London School of Economics. After his return to the country in 1946, he became a leader of the liberation movement in Kenya and the chairman of the African National Union of Kenya. In 1952 he was arrested with his colleagues by the British authorities.
Released in 1961, he played a major role in bringing the country to independence. He headed the African National Union of Kenya (KANU), ensuring him victory in the 1963 general election; he became prime minister, and after Kenya gained independence on December 12, 1963, he became the first president of the country.
He fought against tribal and racial antagonisms; managed to convince foreign capital to invest in Kenya and white settlers to stay in the country and cooperate; he pursued a decidedly pro-Western policy. In an attempt to strengthen power, he banned all political organizations (except KANU) in 1969.
Final answer:
The incorrect statement is that both Kwame Nkrumah and Jomo Kenyatta passed power peacefully to successors, as Nkrumah was ousted by a coup, and Kenyatta died in office without a peaceful electoral transition.
Explanation:
The statement about Kwame Nkrumah and Jomo Kenyatta that is not true is option B: "Both became the leaders of their countries and later passed power peacefully to successors." Kwame Nkrumah was ousted in a military coup in 1966 and did not have the opportunity to pass power peacefully to a successor. On the other hand, Jomo Kenyatta died in office, and while his transition of power did not involve a coup, it was not the peaceful electoral transition that might be implied by the statement. Both leaders indeed worked in collaboration with political parties to bring freedom to their countries and worked to win independence from British rule. Furthermore, both Nkrumah and Kenyatta pursued education abroad, with Nkrumah traveling to the United States and the United Kingdom and Kenyatta also spending significant time in the United Kingdom.
11. How does reading Frank's diary differ from reading a secondary source about the Holocaust?
Reading Anne Frank's diary provides a firsthand perspective of her life during the Holocaust, which is a primary source, while secondary sources offer analysis and context but can potentially simplify historical narratives. The language of a diary is personal, whereas secondary sources adhere to scholarly standards.
Reading Anne Frank's diary provides a firsthand account of her experiences during the Holocaust, making it a primary source. This differs from secondary sources about the Holocaust, which are typically created by individuals who have researched the event and are providing their own analysis or synthesis of primary source documents. Secondary sources may include historiographic arguments, media interpretations, and educational content suitable for different audiences, like high school students. The language and style of a diary are more personal and give direct access to the author's experiences and feelings, while secondary sources often adhere to scholarly standards, offering a more detached and analytical perspective on the events they describe.
Secondary sources are important for understanding the broader context and historiography of the Holocaust, but they can risk simplifying or distorting narratives if not carefully contextualized. Primary sources like Frank's diary allow readers to engage directly with historical experiences, and when evaluating these sources, it's essential to consider the context in which they were created.
What does the cartoonist send by portraying the Supreme Court justice as a Roman emperor?
Final answer:
The cartoonist's portrayal of a Supreme Court justice as a Roman emperor likely suggests that the justice has a significant amount of power and authority, similar to the commanding presence of Roman emperors.
Explanation:
The cartoonist's portrayal of a Supreme Court justice as a Roman emperor sends a message of significant power and authority, often associated with eminence and sometimes absolutism. Such a depiction could imply that the justice wields substantial influence over legal matters in a way that is reminiscent of the wide and sometimes unilateral powers of a Roman emperor. In the context of ancient Rome, emperors would use official portraits to project their image as leaders, in forms such as general, magistrate, or priest, signifying roles with immense responsibility and influence. Therefore, this portrayal could suggest that the justice holds a position of high status and great power, similar to the prestigious role that Roman emperors held.
What impact did the war have on citizens of the world?
Answer:
The impact was terrible depending on the war. Depression spread with illnesses and poverty.
Explanation:
develop an argument that evaluates the extent to which Islamic gunpowder empires developed and expanded between 1450 to 1750. (DBQ form)
Answer:
The Islamic Empire that developed the most in the period was the Ottoman Empire. They used the certain disagreements that existed in the area around the Mediterranean sea that at the peak of its power had around 10 million square km. It was a typical feudal state, where the ruler had supreme authority.
Explanation:
The Ottomans started spreading their country in the 14th Century. Still, their greatest achievement was when they conquered Constantinople in 1453. By the end of 15th Century they conquered practically the whole Balkan Peninsula. During the reign of Selim they conquered Egypt and Syria. Then Suleiman managed to conquer large portion of Central Europe. The downfall came after the peace treaty of 1699. By 1750 the Ottoman Empire was not as strong as it was.
The Islamic gunpowder empires, including the Ottomans, Safavids, and Mughals, varied in their development and expansion between 1450 and 1750.
Between 1450 and 1750, the Islamic gunpowder empires of the Ottoman, Safavid, and Mughal dynasties exhibited varying degrees of development and expansion. While each empire experienced periods of growth and strength, their trajectories differed significantly.
Firstly, the Ottoman Empire emerged as a formidable power during this period, expanding its territorial holdings across three continents, dominating trade routes, and maintaining a powerful military, especially during the reign of Suleiman the Magnificent. The Ottomans showcased impressive administrative systems and a rich cultural heritage.
Secondly, the Safavid Empire in Persia experienced substantial growth under Shah Abbas the Great. He reformed the military, encouraged trade, and promoted the arts and architecture. However, the Safavids' expansion was limited compared to the Ottomans, as they faced challenges from the Ottomans to the west and the Mughals to the east.
Lastly, the Mughal Empire reached its zenith under Akbar the Great, fostering cultural achievements like the Taj Mahal and implementing administrative reforms. However, the empire later faced internal strife and invasions by European powers, leading to its decline.
In summary, while all three Islamic gunpowder empires displayed significant development and expansion between 1450 and 1750, the extent varied. The Ottomans were the most expansive and influential, while the Safavids and Mughals exhibited impressive achievements but faced limitations and eventual decline. These differences highlight the complex dynamics of empire-building during this era.
For such more questions on gunpowder empires
https://brainly.com/question/24172729
#SPJ6
What issues did President George W. Bush face as president? Give two examples.
Answer:
1- Bush administration was characterized by significant income tax cuts in 2001 and 2003, the implementation of Medicare Part D in 2003, increased military spending for two wars, a housing bubble that contributed to the subprime mortgage crisis of 2007–2008, and the Great Recession that followed. (he ruined the economy)
2- Bush led the fight to amend the Constitution by tearing a hole the First Amendment. “The law books are full of restrictions on free speech. And we ought to have this be one of them,” he declared (thankfully, the effort failed).
(he tried to defile the constitution)
and he barely knew how do deal with foreign affairs
Explanation:
Significant income tax reductions in 2001 and 2003, the introduction of Medicare Part D in 2003, and greater military spending for two wars were characteristics of the Bush administration.
By destroying the First Amendment, Bush spearheaded the charge to change the Constitution. "Free expression is subject to many limitations in the legal code.
The Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 and the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003 were two significant tax cuts that were enacted during the administration of President Bush.
They came to be known, discussed, and examined collectively as the "Bush tax cuts". The tax cuts boosted the standard deduction for married couples, did away with the estate tax, and lowered marginal tax rates. They were set to expire ten years after their passage.
Learn more about George W. Bush here:
https://brainly.com/question/32316088
#SPJ2
Question 4 of 5
2 Points
What did Aaron Douglas's painting Song of the Towers show?
O
A. African American roots in Africa
O
B. African American life in New York City
O
C. African American achievements in science
O
D. African American slavery in the South
Answer:
I think its B
Explanation:
african American life in New york city
Aaron Douglas's painting Song of the Towers portrays the spirit of the Harlem Renaissance and the African American experience in New York during the 1920s.
Explanation:Aaron Douglas's painting Song of the Towers represents African American life in New York City. The painting embodies the spirit and culture of the Harlem Renaissance, a significant cultural and artistic explosion that took place in Harlem, New York during the 1920s. The painting captures the essence of African American experiences during this time, and Douglas's use of silhouettes and geometric shapes captures the vibrancy and energy of life in New York.
Learn more about Aaron Douglas's painting here:https://brainly.com/question/34711008
#SPJ2
According to Monroe, will the United States interfere with South African countries once they gain independence? *
Your answer
Answer:
The Monroe doctrine was about neutrality! SO, 1) the United States would not interfere in the internal affairs of or the wars between European powers. 2) the United States recognized and would not interfere with existing colonies and dependencies in the Western Hemisphere. 3) the Western Hemisphere was closed to future colonization. 4) any attempt by a European power to oppress or control any nation in the Western Hemisphere would be viewed as a hostile act against the United States.
Solve for g. Make sure to show your work.
( 16 ÷ 4 )( 3 x 7 ) = g
Answer:
(16÷4)(3×7)=g
4×21=g
84=g
Where does a newly elected President take the oath of office?
Answer:
The balcony of federal hall
Explanation:
Which promise made at the Yalta Conference did Stalin ultimately renege on? A. cooperating in trials to bring former Nazis to justice B. holding free elections in Eastern Europe after the war C. supporting the United States in the war against Japan D. dividing power in Germany amongst the Allied Powers
Answer: B. holding free electionz in Eastern Europe after the war
Explain what the grandfather clause for voting rights was
Answer:
statutory or constitutional device enacted by seven Southern states between 1895 and 1910 to deny suffrage to African Americans. It provided that those who had enjoyed the right to vote prior to 1866 or 1867, and their lineal descendants, would be exempt from recently enacted educational, property, or tax requirements for voting. Because the former slaves had not been granted the franchise until the adoption of the Fifteenth Amendment in 1870, those clauses worked effectively to exclude black people from the vote but assured the franchise to many impoverished and illiterate whites.
Explanation:
Plsssss help meee :(
What was the important result of the Civil Rights Act of 1866?
O It frees the slaves from use on plantations
It frees slaves but does not allow them to be educated
It allowed slaves to be to be sharecroppers
It establishes in Federal Law for the first time, the principle of e
muostablishes citizenship.
Answer:
d
Explanation:
The moment the idea is admitted into society that property is not as sacred as the laws of God and that there is no force of law in public justice to protect it, anarchy and tyranny commence. If "thou shall not covet" and "thou shall not steal" are not commandments of heaven, they must be made inviolable precepts in every society before it can be civilized or made free. What does Adams believe about the right to property? Check all that apply. property must be recognized as sacred and should be protected by law failure to protect the right of property can lead to a chaotic society property doesn’t need to be protected by law according to God, people should not steal property is not as valuable as the laws of God
Answer:
failure to protect the right of property can lead to a chaotic society
Explanation:
This paragraph claims that properties should be protected by right and not seen to be undeserving of a legal backing since they are viewed as less sacred. It further points out the possible tyranny and anarchy that might emerge if properties are not backed with a force of justice to protect them.
Considering the excerpts from Adams in the question, what he believed about the property right is that:
property must be recognized as sacred and should be protected by law;failure to protect the right of property can lead to a chaotic society.This is evident when he said that "anarchy and tyranny commence" when there is no public law or the belief of the laws of God in the sacredness of the land.
Also, he suggested that "if thou shall not covet" and "thou shall not steal" are not part of God's law, the society itself should embrace the idea, otherwise, such society will not be considered civilized nor free.
Hence, in this case, the correct answer is: "property must be recognized as sacred and should be protected by law; failure to protect the right of property can lead to a chaotic society."
Learn more here: https://brainly.com/question/17735536
Why did many women in the South end up
working in the fields?
• Their husbands forced them to do farm work
• Their husbands were oft fighting the war
• Their husbands worked in factories,
How did the U.S. public respond to Operation Desert Storm?
A. Many people opposed any type of military intervention in Iraq.
B. The public considered Operation Desert Storm a huge success.
C. Voters were reluctant to fund more military spending.
D. Most U.S. citizens did not know about Operation Desert Storm.
Answer:
B. i believe
Explanation:
Which of the following is an effect of economic development in the developing world?
Answer:
The main cause of these effects is economics — based on the production and exchange of goods and services. Restrictions on the import and export of goods and services can potentially hamper the economic stability of countries who choose to impose too many.
Explanation:
The United States has always had laws to protect children. True or false?
Answer:
False
Explanation:
What are the cultural differences between areas that were covered by ice
during the last ice age and areas that were not covered?
O
A. Areas that were covered tend to be more Republican.
B. Industrialization occurred earlier in areas that had not been
covered.
O
C. Ares that were not covered tend to be more Libertarian.
O
D. Industrialization occurred earlier in areas that had been covered.
The cultural differences between areas that were covered by ice are industrialization occurred earlier in areas that had been covered.
What areas did the ice age affect?The ice age peaked during the Last Glacial Maximum about 20,000 years ago, when glaciers covered vast swathes of North America, Europe, South America, and Asia.
When was the last ice age on Earth?The Last Glacial Period (LGP), also known colloquially as the last ice age or simply ice age, occurred from the end of the Eemian to the end of the Younger Dryas, encompassing the period c. 115,000 – c. 11,700 years ago.
Learn more about the ice age here https://brainly.com/question/1982956
#SPJ2
How did increasing radicalism and violence in Kansas foreshadow future conflict?
Answer:
It foreshadowed the civil war because of the radicalism and violence the United States were divided between anti slavery and pro slavery
Explanation:
In Kansas, people on all sides of this controversial issue flooded the territory, trying to influence the vote in their favor. Rival territorial governments, election fraud, and squabbles over land claims all contributed to the violence of this era.
Throughout the conflicts during Bleeding Kansas, there were repeated incidents of electoral fraud, raids, assaults, murder, and other atrocities committed by abolitionists and supporters of slavery. The conflict eventually degenerated into gang-style violence and further into paramilitary style guerrilla warfare.
The increasing radicalism and violence in Kansas foreshadowed future conflict by highlighting the deep divisions and tensions over the issue of slavery.
Explanation:The increasing radicalism and violence in Kansas foreshadowed future conflict by highlighting the deep divisions and tensions over the issue of slavery. The clashes between pro- and anti-slavery forces in Kansas, known as Bleeding Kansas, demonstrated the inability to peacefully resolve the issue of slavery through popular sovereignty. The violence in Kansas served as a precursor to the violent conflict that would erupt during the Civil War.
Learn more about Radicalism and violence foreshadowing future conflict here:https://brainly.com/question/16026208
#SPJ11
Which creative work would have reflected typical American themes in the
mid-1800s?
Answer:
A novel in which the hero moves to the woods and learns from the experience
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
A novel in which the hero moves to the woods and learns from the experience.
Which statement best summarizes what Churchill is saying in this section? "In front of the iron curtain which lies across Europe are other causes for anxiety. … in a great number of countries, far from the Russian frontiers and throughout the world, Communist fifth columns are established and work in complete unity and absolute obedience to the directions they receive from the Communist center. Except in the British Commonwealth and in the United States where Communism is in its infancy, the Communist parties or fifth columns constitute a growing challenge and peril to Christian civilization." — Winston Churchill
Communism exists on both sides of the Iron Curtain.
The United States and Britain are the only countries that do not have Communist parties.
The Soviet Union secretly controls every country in the world.
Answer:
Communism exists on both sides of the Iron Curtain.
Explanation:
In this speech Churchill wants to warn everyone that the Communism is spreading too fast, and that already is a danger for the whole world. The iron curtain that is being created between East and the West will not be enough if that danger is not to be removed. Although Great Britain and United States weren't so endangered Churchill realized that this can also happen with them.
Answer:
Communism exists on both sides of the Iron Curtain.
Explanation: