The answer would be B). Athens lost to Sparta, and the Spartans outlawed democracy.
Hopes this helps :D
Hi TrinTrin227,
Answer - D. Athens Lost to Sparta, and the Spartens and outlawed democracy.
So Sparta beat Athens and none of the other choices state that sparta won except D! When Sparta won they weakended all greek city states for 50 years.
Alexander was the son of _____.
Aristotle
Philip
Philip II
Alexander I
If you're talking about Alexander the great, his father was Philip ll
Hope this helps =)
What countries were the triple entente was a political alliance formed between?
What type of response did the Curtis Act evoke from the Five Civilized Tribes
The Curtis Act evoked a negative response from the Five Civilized Tribes as it removed restrictions protecting their lands and abolished tribal governments. The act led to the loss of control over reservation lands and the exploitation of Native Americans for their land and resources.
Explanation:The Curtis Act, enacted in 1898, evoked a negative response from the Five Civilized Tribes (Choctaw, Cherokee, Chickasaw, Muscogee, and Seminoles) of Oklahoma. This act removed the restrictions that had previously protected the tribes from allotment of their lands, thereby allowing non-Natives to purchase their lands. It also abolished tribal governments, stripping the tribes of their sovereignty.
The Curtis Act opened up millions of acres of land for sale to white farmers and ranchers, leading to the rapid loss of control of reservation lands by the tribes. Additionally, the discovery of oil and valuable natural resources further exacerbated the situation, as individuals sought to swindle the Native Americans out of their land or mineral rights. This act had devastating consequences for the tribes, resulting in the loss of their land, culture, and heritage.
Why was a weak central government set up under the Articles of Confederation?
to stop abuse of power and tyranny by the central government
to expand the taxation powers of the central government
to copy the government after that of Great Britain
to run the independent states with limitless power
to stop abuse of power and tyranny by the central government
describe ancient greek philosophy.
Ancient Greek philosophy arose in the 6th century BC and continued throughout the Hellenistic period and the period in which Ancient Greece was part of the Roman Empire. Philosophy was used to make sense out of the world in a non-religious way.
Ancient Greek philosophy emerged in Greece and is considered the birthplace of Western philosophy. It began with the Presocratics and continued with the three great philosophers Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle.
Explanation:Ancient Greek philosophy emerged in ancient Greece and is considered the birthplace of Western philosophy. It began with the Presocratics, followed by the three great philosophers Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle. The ancient Greek philosophers engaged in dialectic and debate, using rational methods to seek knowledge.
The roots of classical thought in Greece can be traced, at least in part, to Egypt. Ancient Greek philosophy was a practical endeavor, emphasizing the search for internal peace and contentment. Furthermore, In their quest for knowledge, the ancient Greeks also employed discussion and dialectic. These discussions then served as a knowledge gainer in various aspects.
Learn more about Ancient Greek Philosophy here:https://brainly.com/question/29774517
#SPJ3
What enabled southern states to enact measures to disenfranchise African Americans and keep blacks and whites separate?
1) an editorial written by Ida B. Wells
2) the passage of the Fourteenth Amendment
3) the beginning of World War I
4) the removal of federal troops from the South
4) the removal of federal troops from the South
Troops were removed from the South when Reconstruction ended officially in 1878. Prior to that the South was under the leadership of Radical Republicans who ensured Southerners followed new amendments and laws to create an slave-free society.
Following the end of Reconstruction, Southerners began a series of laws referred to as the Jim Crow laws. These laws created a system of segregation in the South. In addition, laws were created to limit blacks' ability to vote. Literacy tests and poll taxes were put into place which virtually took away a black man's right to vote. This system of legal discrimination and segregation continued for nearly 100 years in the South.
Final answer:
Enactment of disenfranchisement and segregation in the South was enabled by the withdrawal of federal troops after Reconstruction ended in 1877, leading to Southern states implementing discriminatory laws and tactics like poll taxes and literacy tests.
Explanation:
The southern states were able to enact measures to disenfranchise African Americans and enforce segregation, largely due to the removal of federal troops from the South after the end of Reconstruction in 1877. With the federal government's retreat from enforcing the Civil War Amendments, which aimed to protect the civil rights of African Americans, Southern whites regained control of state legislatures and began implementing a variety of voter discrimination tactics. These included poll taxes, literacy tests, grandfather clauses, white primaries, and racial gerrymandering. Intimidation and violence by groups like the Ku Klux Klan further added to the suppression of African American civil rights. The Jim Crow laws set the stage for an era of legalized segregation in public schools, accommodation, transportation, and other public places.
Imagine that you are a 14-year-old girl, from a poor family, working in a factory in the year 1890. Organizers are encouraging you and your coworkers to unionize. How might you react? Explain your answer.
As a 14-year-old girl working in a factory in 1890, my reaction to the encouragement to unionize would depend on my understanding of the benefits and risks involved. I might be hesitant, enthusiastic, or cautious about joining the union.
Explanation:If I were a 14-year-old girl working in a factory in the year 1890, my reaction to the encouragement to unionize would depend on my understanding of the benefits and risks involved. Here are a few possible reactions:
I might be hesitant to join the union because I am from a poor family and may not fully comprehend the concept and potential benefits of collective bargaining. I might also be concerned about the repercussions of joining, as factory owners often punished unionized workers by firing them or cutting their wages.I might be enthusiastic about joining the union because I understand that by uniting with my coworkers, we can negotiate for better wages, shorter work hours, safer working conditions, and an end to child labor. I would see the union as an opportunity to improve not only my own circumstances but also the lives of other workers.I might be cautious about joining the union because I fear the potential consequences of organizing. I might worry that factory owners would use their power and influence to suppress the union and retaliate against its members.In any case, the decision to join or not to join the union would ultimately depend on my personal circumstances, level of awareness about labor rights, and the perceived risks and benefits of unionization.
As a 14-year-old girl from a poor family working in a factory in 1890, deciding whether to unionize would depend on factors such as fear of retaliation, hope for better conditions, solidarity with coworkers, lack of awareness, distrust of authority, and pressure from family. The conditions of the time and personal experiences would shape the decision.
As a 14-year-old girl from a poor family working in a factory in 1890, the prospect of unionizing would likely evoke a mix of emotions and considerations. Fear of Retaliation: I might be afraid of potential consequences if the factory owners find out about my involvement in unionization efforts. In the 19th century, workers often faced harsh treatment, dismissal, or even blacklisting for participating in such activities. Hope for Better Conditions: Despite the fear, the idea of joining a union could be appealing. Poor working conditions, long hours, and low pay were common issues in factories during that time. Joining a union might offer the possibility of negotiating for better wages, shorter work hours, and improved working conditions. Solidarity with Coworkers: If my coworkers are supportive of the unionization efforts, a sense of solidarity could develop. Knowing that we are all in this together might make the idea of unionizing more attractive. Collective action often carries more weight than individual protests. Lack of Awareness: Being young and working in challenging conditions, I might not be fully aware of the broader social and economic issues surrounding labor rights and unions. Education and awareness campaigns by organizers could play a crucial role in helping me understand the potential benefits of unionizing. Distrust of Authority: Growing up in a poor family, I might have experienced or witnessed exploitation and distrust of authority figures. This could make me more receptive to the idea of challenging the factory owners through unionization, seeing it as a way to stand up against unfair treatment. Pressure from Family: If my family is supportive of the idea of joining a union, it could influence my decision. On the other hand, if they are worried about potential repercussions, they might advise against it.
In summary, my reaction to the encouragement to unionize would depend on a variety of factors, including my understanding of the issues, fear of consequences, solidarity with coworkers, and the influence of family. The conditions of the time and my personal experiences would shape my perspective and ultimately determine whether I would support and participate in unionization efforts.
What is the main reason so many Great Society programs became law during the Johnson presidency?
The reason why Great Society programs were passed so easily during the Johnson Presidency was because the Democrats had a super majority in Congress.
What was Congress like under Johnson?When Johnson was elected into office, the Democratic party he was part of also gained a super majority in both the Senate and the House of Representatives.
This allowed Johnson to pass a lot of his ideas known as Great Society programs into law because the democratic supermajority often backed the President.
Find out more on Great Society programs at https://brainly.com/question/18720238.
How does the portrayal of Nero’s character in this painting compare to what you've read about Nero in "The Contest" and in the article?
They both seek of still paintings. They hold to the coloration.
The scene of people about to be burned before a large gathering and the painting's title are consistent with Nero's reputation as a harsh, ruthless tyrant, which the story and article also support. The scene in the painting closely relates to information in the article about Nero's persecution of Christians. Some people in the scene seem upset, but Nero is watching people about to be burned without any hint of being disturbed by what he sees. The tiger Nero holds by the leash might symbolize Nero's harshness and ferocity. The people about to be burned remind the audience of what it's like to be a victim of immense cruelty and injustice.
thats the plato answer!
Select the lands under French control in the early 1700's.
the lands under french control in the early 1700s were Canada, Québec, Trois-Rivières and Montréal, Hudson's Bay; Acadie, in the northeast; Plaisance, on the island of Newfoundland, and Louisiane ( Louisiana), Gulf of Mexico, including all the Great Lakes of North America.
What classification of government distinguishes between presidential and parliamentary government?
How power is distributed is the classification of government that distinguishes among presidential and parliamentary government. Moreover, some writers do not make any difference between state and government.
EXPLANATION:
Some writers use government and state in the same sense and at the same time provide a classification of the state. Modern writers disagree with this type of classification.
According to some writers, there should be no state classification, because all states are the same in four traits—population, government, territory, and sovereignty—are important for all states. The American writer Willoughby argues that there can be no states classification; states can only be classified by the administration. In fact, the classification of governments is the states’ classification. The state expresses its wishes through the government. L e a c * * k and Gilchrist also approve that there must be a government classification.
Aristotle’s classification of states is according to two principles:
1. The number of persons who train supreme power;
2. The culminations they search for serving self-interest or profit of the community.
Aristotle believed that when the rulers targeted the good of the community, the states would become a pure form of the state. When the rulers in such a state became self-centered, that state would be called a p e r v e r t e d state.
According to Aristotle, if sovereignty is in one person, it is Monarchy. The form of p e r v e r t e d is Tyranny. If sovereignty exists in a small minority of the people, that is Aristocracy. If the sovereign power exists in a large part of the population, it is polity. The form of p e r v e r t e d is Democracy. If this small minority utilizes sovereignty for its own self-centered ends, that is the Oligarchy.
LEARN MORE:
If you’re interested in learning more about this topic, we recommend you to also take a look at the following questions:
• What is essential to the success of any government? https://brainly.com/question/13007951
• In the United States the government creates laws and regulations that? https://brainly.com/question/4177869
KEYWORDS : Presidential Government, Parliamentary Government, Classification of Government, oligarchy, democracy,
Subject : Social Studies
Class : 10-12
Sub-Chapter : Classification of Government
Final answer:
The classification distinguishing presidential from parliamentary government systems is based on the relationship between the legislative and executive branches. In a parliamentary system, the prime minister is chosen by the legislature. In a presidential system, the president is elected by the people and is separate from the legislature.
Explanation:
The classification of government that distinguishes between presidential and parliamentary government refers to the system of democracy in a country. In a parliamentary system, the head of government, known as the prime minister, is typically a member of the legislature and is chosen by the parliamentary members. This fosters a close relationship between the legislative and executive branches. Examples of countries with parliamentary systems include Great Britain, Canada, Japan, and Italy.
Conversely, a presidential system features a president who is elected by the people and operates independently from the legislative branch. The president serves as both the head of state and head of government and has a fixed term in office. Countries with presidential systems include the United States, Mexico, Brazil, and the Philippines.
Some countries have a semi-presidential system, which combines elements of both parliamentary and presidential systems. The head of state is popularly elected and serves a fixed term, while the head of government is chosen by the legislature. Both the president and prime minister have political power in this arrangement.
What contributions to government administration and culture did the Assyrians make?
The Assyrian system of having local:
1. Governors report to a central authority become the fundamental model of administration.
2. They are the first to have library with many features of a modern library.
Who was the roman governor tha ordered jesus’s trial and execution?
The Hawaiian Islands were formed from a type of catastrophic event, occurring many times. Each island in the chain is composed of at least one major. What is that major?
Catastrophic events on Earth have both negative and positive effects. One positive effect is the formation of new land features. The Hawaiian Islands were formed from a catastrophic event, occurring many times. Each island in the chain is composed of at least one major Volcanoe
The major that comprises the Hawaiian Islands is volcanic eruptions.
Explanation:The major that comprises the Hawaiian Islands is volcanic eruptions. The islands of the Hawaiian archipelago were formed by volcanic activity from an undersea magma source called a hotspot. This hotspot remains stationary as the tectonic plate over it continues to shift, creating new volcanoes and forming the islands.
Learn more about volcanic eruptions here:
https://brainly.com/question/38420535
#SPJ11
?
What combat advantage did the Spanish conquistadores have over the native peoples?
They developed immunity to diseases.
They learned the native peoples' languages to intercept messages.
They created alliances with other European invaders.
They attacked on horseback and used swords.
They attacked on horseback and used swords is the combat advantage did the Spanish conquistadors have over the native peoples.
Who were the Spanish conquistadors?Spanish Conquistadors are the sanctioned pirates. Their main objective is to take the lands and resources for their investors. They also conquer the lands for Treasury and show glory. They have major role in spreading the regions.
Thus, option D is correct.
For more details about Spanish conquistadors, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/1314391
#SPJ2
Ill feelings arose between the states because of claims to the: mississippi valley florida territory northwest territorylouisiana territory
northwest territory
hope this helps
The Tar Creek region was once one of the world’s richest __________ fields.
A.
oil
B.
natural gas
C.
gypsum
D.
lead mining
Please select the best answer from the choices provided
Answer:
It’s D
Explanation:
I just took the test
vladimir lenin enacted which policy as the leader of the soviet union
Final answer:
Vladimir Lenin enacted the New Economic Policy (NEP) as the leader of the Soviet Union. The NEP aimed to revive the Soviet economy after years of war and economic crisis.
Explanation:
The policy enacted by Vladimir Lenin as the leader of the Soviet Union was the New Economic Policy (NEP).
The New Economic Policy was implemented in 1921 and aimed to revive the Soviet economy after years of war and economic crisis.
It introduced limited market exchange of goods and allowed small-scale private enterprise, while the state still maintained control over key industries. The NEP led to a temporary improvement in living standards and a cultural renaissance in the arts and literature.
unlimited speaking time
Freedom of speech (i don't know whats your question exactly).
hope this helps :)
Answer:
any on knows the answer?
Explanation:
Please select the word from the list that best fits the definition
unlimited speaking time
For whom were the first ready-to-wear suits made in America?
The first ready-to-wear suits in America were produced for mail-order customers by factories in New York and Chicago, leveraging assembly line methods for efficiency. These garments catered to a broader audience and represented a shift from custom-tailored clothing due to economic and technological changes, with unions playing a key role in advocating for workers' rights.
The first ready-to-wear suits in America were made primarily for mail-order customers and were produced by factories in cities such as New York and Chicago. These factories employed agents who traveled to towns large and small to take measurements and orders for suits. The suits were made in a method similar to assembly line production, with the work divided into 'sections' for efficiency. Men's suits were being produced en masse to cater to a wider clientele, allowing for faster production and less individual tailoring.
During the period before World War I, technological advancements and economic realities paved the way for ready-to-wear clothing, largely influenced by the fact that intricate construction and customized fitting were too time-consuming and expensive to maintain for everyday garments, though they continued to be employed for business suits and special occasions.
The Jewish and Italian custom tailors and laborers in New York contributed significantly to the garment industry, forming unions and consolidating their efforts to fight for better work conditions, such as in the strikes of 1913. Their tenacity led to significant improvements, such as a reduced fifty-three-hour work week and increased wages.
Spunetimi 3 motive de ce primii oameni in preistorie sau deplasat si sau asezat pe teritorii foarte intinse
Three reasons why prehistoric people were settling deeper inside the mainland territories are:
- Less natural disasters;
The inland territories are much less effected by natural disasters, and the climate is much more predictable and its much safer for living in this areas, and this is a big factor when deciding where to live.
- Dense vast lowland forests;
The vast forests inside of the continents were of huge importance to the early people because they were providing lots of food sources for them, so naturally people were moving into the areas were food was more abundant.
- Bigger and more abundant pray;
The bigger pray that can feed the people better and for longer time was usually located deeper into the continents, so people were attracted by the opportunity to have much bigger and stable food sources.
What statement about the puritains is not true?a. They settled in new englandb. They welcomed people of all religionsc. They believed in education for alld. They worked hard to succeedplease hurry!
Do you think Africans needed to be enslaved in order to civilize them and bring religion? 5 sentences
No. If that racist sentence were true than you would have to enslave whites Mexicans and all aswell. This sentence is false. In fact had the white not enslaved the black than maybe the black wouldn’t have to worry about “white cops” pulling them over or messing with them.
Why is the cell theory considered a scientific theory? A. It has always been proven to be correct. B. It was proposed by several scientists. C. It was formed over 100 years ago. D. It is an explanation that is well supported.
The cell theory is considered a scientific theory primarily because of "It is an explanation that is well supported. option D.
" Here's a more detailed explanation:
A scientific theory is a comprehensive and well-substantiated explanation of a natural phenomenon based on a body of evidence and experimental observations.
It is a fundamental concept in the scientific method, and theories serve as the highest level of scientific understanding.
The cell theory meets the criteria of a scientific theory for several reasons:
**Empirical Evidence:**
The cell theory is based on extensive empirical evidence gathered through centuries of scientific observation and experimentation. Researchers have used microscopes and various techniques to study cells and have consistently found that living organisms are composed of cells.
**Reproducibility:**
The observations supporting the cell theory are reproducible.
Different scientists using different methods and instruments can independently verify the existence of cells in living organisms.
**Predictive Power:**
The cell theory has predictive power.
It provides a framework for understanding biological processes and predicting how cells function, divide, and interact with their environments.
**Consistency with Existing Knowledge:**
The cell theory is consistent with other established scientific principles and knowledge in biology, such as genetics, evolution, and biochemistry.
"It has always been proven to be correct," is not entirely accurate because scientific theories are always subject to refinement and revision as new evidence and discoveries emerge.
While the cell theory has been robustly supported by a wealth of evidence, it has evolved over time to accommodate new findings.
"It was proposed by several scientists," is true to some extent, but the key criterion for a theory is not the number of scientists who proposed it but the strength of the evidence supporting it.
"It was formed over 100 years ago," is not a defining characteristic of a scientific theory.
The age of a theory does not determine its validity or status as a theory; it's the evidence and support that matter.
For similar questions on theory
https://brainly.com/question/30759437
#SPJ3
HELP AS SOON AS POSSIBLE PLEASE WILL MAKE THE BRAINLIEST
Which factor could help cause the fall of a civilization?
A.
enormous wealth
B.
poorly managed irrigation
C.
signs from the gods
D.
neighboring deserts
Answer: B) poorly managed irrigation
Explanation:
. Why were many of the Greek poli unhappy with Athens in the years preceding the Peloponnesian War?
After the Persian wars, Athens became the supreme naval power in Grece. It created the Delian League to ward off possible Persian attacks. Athenas grew so powerful that they could dictate the laws, customs, and trade of all her neighbors in Attica and the islands of the Aegean. This power made the Athenian policy makers arrogant and intolerant with other city-states. Thus creating a discontent of the Greek polis.
How much did the United States pay for the Louisiana Purchase? A) $10 million B) $5 million C) $20 million D) $15 million
D. 15 million
Hope it helps!
i think the answer is 15 million
Why was rail construction concentrated in the east before 1870 and in the west after 1870
The correct answer is :
It was highly populated in the east vs. the west, so there was more money to build the railroads.
Rail construction was concentrated in the east before 1870, and in the west after 1870, because there was a need to increase the connectivity of routes in the east in order to fulfill the requirements of transportation of traded goods.
What is the significance of rail construction?Rail construction was introduced in the European colonies like India in the years during the 1850s. This was because, railways were needed to enable faster and better connectivity of trade routes for transportation of goods as well as commute of people.
Rail construction in the west, however, started very late towards the end of the nineteenth century because western world was already well-connected via roadways as well as waterways through canals.
Therefore, the significance of rail construction has been aforementioned.
Learn more about rail construction here:
https://brainly.com/question/27824813
#SPJ2
What was one of the similarities of the Maya's, the Incas, and the Aztecs?
There are many similarities but I have listed one below.
All 3 pre-columbian major civilizations the mayam the Maya, the Aztec, and the Inca were all without the one thing that we always see in early civilizations. It's a geographic feature which is a river. So there was no rivers. That in itself was very odd and rarely do civilizations develop without rivers.
For each statement use the drop down menu to indicate whether it was a characteristics of the north or the south
Give us options to choose from, please!
south
south
south
south
north