Answer:
1868.
Explanation:
The Constitution outlawing slavery was changed in 1865. The 13th and 14th Amendments were the result of the three-fifth compromise agreement. The three-fifth compromise agreement was enacted in the law which gave Southerners more power by counting their slaves to gain taxation and representation.
After the Civil War, the Congress passed 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments which abolished slavery gave them rights to be called a citizen of the United States, and right to vote. These amendments were passed in the years 1865, 1868, and 1869-70 respectively.
The foundation of counting blacks as a whole person was in 1865 with the 13th Amendment which abolished slavery. But, it was officially enacted with the 14th Amendment which stated that the African-Americans will be counted as a whole person and not 3/5 persons.
So, the correct answer is 1868.
This is an action taken to support or oppose specific legislation at the national, state, or local level, and it could include, for example, contacting a member of Congress, a state legislator, or a city councilperson to request his or her sponsorship or vote in favor of or against a specific bill.a. Political campaign activityb. Advocacyc. Lobbyingd. Cold-calling
Answer:
c. Lobbying
Explanation:
Lobbying can described as the act of persuasion to influence a decision or legislation to go in their favor. Lobbying usually involves a group of people or an individual engaging in activities in an attempt to influence the decision of a government or the legislative arm, in order to have their interest represented by such decisions and legislations.
The example stated in the question, whereby a member of congress or a state legislator is contacted to seek their sponsorship or vote in favor of or against a specific bill is regarded as an act of lobbying.
The government is shielded from suit by the doctrine of sovereign immunity. The doctrine comes from an ancient principle of English public law: ‘The King can do no wrong.'
The rule is not intended to protect public officials from charges of wrongdoing.
As a result of the principle explained in this excerpt from the text, citizens of the United States:
A) cannot sue representatives or officers of the Federal Government even if they commit a crime.
B) must petition their representatives in Congress to pass an act to let them sue the government.
C) need to bring their case to the Supreme Court and win a ruling authorizing them to sue the government.
D) can only sue the government in limited cases already approved by Congress.
Answer:
Answer is D. Can only sue the government in limited cases already approved by Congress.
Refer below.
Explanation:
The rule is not intended to protect public officials from charges of wrongdoing.
As a result of the principle explained in this excerpt from the text, citizens of the United States:
Can only sue the government in limited cases already approved by Congress
Answer:
The best answer is "D"
can only sue the government in limited cases already approved by Congress.
Explanation:
Sovereign immunity is a legal system of judgment whereby sovereign or state cannot commit a legal wrong and is immune from suits filed by individuals/citizens and they can't be prosecuted in courts.
From this excerpt it is clearly stated that citizens/individuals can only sue the government in limited cases already approved by Congress.
Peter is in a clinical trial for a new antidepressant and thinks he's getting a "real" pill; he actually starts to feel better just because he thinks he's getting treatment. When health improves due to the healing power of belief, it's called the effect.
Answer:
Placebo effect
Explanation:
A placebo is an inactive substance or drug such as saline water or sugar pill, some people tend to feel better after being administered these inactive drugs. These individuals have faith in the healing power of drugs rather than actually the content of the drug and hence begin to experience improve health.
The placebo effect is defined as a phenomenon in which some people experience a benefit after the administration of an inactive substance or drug. The expectations of the patient play a significant role in the placebo effect; the more a person expects the treatment to work, the more likely they are to exhibit a placebo response.
When the body is able to heal as a result of one believing that they will be healed, this is known as the Placebo Effect.
The Placebo effect:
Works by the brain tricking the body into healing because it believes that there is treatment Do not actually mean the person is curedPeter is feeling better because he believes that he is being treated. This is because the brain believes the same and has tricked the body into believing the same too.
We can therefore conclude that this is the placebo effect at work.
Find out more at https://brainly.com/question/10467057.
Hassan enjoys lifting weights in his spare time, but his gain in strength has come to a plateau. He is considering giving up weight lifting altogether, unless he experiences significant gains in the near future. Hassan is seeking a ________ incentive.
Answer:
POSITIVE
Explanation:
Hassan enjoys lifting weights in his spare time, but his gain in strength has come to a plateau. He is considering giving up weight lifting altogether, unless he experiences significant gains in the near future. Hassan is seeking a POSITIVE incentive.
Answer:
Positive incentive
Explanation:
Positive means a desirable or a constructive quality or attribute.
While a positive-incentive value is the anticipated pleasure that is involved in the performance of a particular behavior or action, for example, eating a particular food or doing a particular thing to get sometime constructive (positive) out of it.
Hassan said he would stop weightlifting if he doesn't see changes on his body.
Hence he is looking for a Positive Incentive.
There are several propoals to look at, many of which claim to "collect information from security controls and perform analysis based on pre-established metrics." What capability are these vendors referring to?
Answer:
Continuous security monitoring
Explanation:
CONTINUOUS SECURITY MONITORING is a type of security solution that automates security monitoring across various sources of security information.
Continuous security monitoring is essential today because organizations depend on technology and data to complete key business processes and transactions.
Select the answer that best characterizes the argument below.
Witness Clark testified that he saw the defendant emerge from the burgled house with an expensive camera. But, members of the jury, you should reject this testimony because Clark suffers from brain damage, and he has trouble remembering things accurately.
A) Appeal to unqualified authority.
B) No fallacy.
C) Argument against the person, circumstantial.
D) Appeal to ignorance.
E) Appeal to pity.
Answer: B) No fallacy.
Explanation:
No fallacy is the situation in which no faulty or false meaning, reasoning or factors are included in formation of argument. No mistaken belief is involved .
According to the question, no fallacy is the request that is made for Clark's side as he has not made up any false statement rather it is his brain damage condition that makes him forget things.Thus, testimony should be cancelled.
Other options are incorrect because appeal to ignorance, pity appeal,unqualified authority appeal and Argument against the person, circumstantial is not depicted through scenario. Thus, the correct option is option(B).
Kabi is a well-respected supervisor at a major corporation. Co-workers describe her as very self-aware, empathic toward others, and very good at managing relationships. Based on this information, it is likely that Kabi has a high degree of __________.
Answer:
Emotional Intelligence.
Explanation:
From all qualities been displayed above, it is obvious that Kabi possess a good emotional intelligence which puts her in good relationship with her co-workers.
We probably all know people, either at work or in our personal lives, who are really good listeners. No matter what kind of situation we're in, they always seem to know just what to say and how to say it so that we're not offended or upset. They're caring and considerate, and even if we don't find a solution to our problem.
Scott has great respect for his long-time manager and mentor, Jaime. When Scott is confronted with a challenging ethical issue, he asks himself how Jaime would have handled the situation. Scott uses ____________________ as an ethical system to guide him in his decision making.
Answer:
relativism.
Explanation:
Ethical Relativism is the theory that theorizes that whether an action is right or wrong morally is decided based on the norms of the society in which it is performed. In ethical relativism, certain actions can be considered right in one society whereas can be abhorred in another.
In the given scenario, Scott is using ethical relativism to make a decision. It is ethical relativism because he trying to think what would be ethically right if his mentor or manager Jaime would have been in that position. He is trying to make a decision by relating to the ethical system of Jaime.
Thus, ethical relativism is the correct answer.
Children who grow up in the same home with the same parents still have very different day-to-day human relationships in different school and after-school settings. These broader situational factors are called the ________.
Answer: Non-shared environment
Explanation:
The non-Shared environment is one of the type of genetic analysis in which an individual people are living together and also share common family environment but they are dissimilar in nature and the various types of activities so this concept is also known as the Un-shared nature.
According to the given question, the Children are growing up in the similar home and they have same parents but they have different types of human relationship and activities and this type of broader situational factor is refers as the Non-shared environment.
Therefore, Non-shared environment is the correct answer.
John, Damon, and Roxanne work at Digizel Inc. They have been working together for two years. They meet their targets every day. However, they never do more than what is expected of them. Salma, a new employee, joins their group. Within the first week, she starts exceeding her targets and performing exceptionally well. This angers John, Damon, and Roxanne. In this scenario, Salma broke the group’s ________.
Answer: Norms
Explanation:
According to the given scenario, Salma is basically broke the group's norms as John, Roxanne and the Damon work in the Digizel Inc., for the past tow years and Salma is the new employee in an organization who joins their group.
The group norms is one of the type of social expectation that helps in learning the behavior as a member in the group for function more effectively.
In the first week, Salma start exceeding her performance and the target so based on the given situation the Salma is breaking the group's norms as it is one of the type of informal guide-lining process that provide the conformity to the various type of group function and activities.
Therefore, Norms is the correct answer.
Aaron's persistent feelings of sadness and impending doom dominate his life. Every time he says anything even a little positive to his therapist, the therapist smiles. Otherwise the therapist has a stone face. This therapist is probably using some variation of:
A. cognitive therapy.
B. behavioral therapy.
C. psychoanalytic therapy.
D. interpersonal psychotherapy.
Answer:
The correct answer is B. behavioral therapy
Explanation:
Aaron's persistent feelings of sadness and impending doom dominate his life. Every time he says anything even a little positive to his therapist, the therapist smiles. Otherwise the therapist has a stone face. This therapist is probably using some variation of BEHAVIORAL THERAPY
The therapist's technique of smiling only when Aaron says something positive suggests the use of behavior therapy, potentially within the broader approach of cognitive-behavioral therapy. The option (B) is correct.
This approach often utilizes positive reinforcement to encourage a desired behavior. Given that cognitive therapy also plays a role in addressing Aaron's dysfunctional thoughts by helping clients identify and change distorted automatic thoughts and assumptions, as developed by Aaron Beck, the full approach the therapist might be using is called cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT).
CBT is an integration that considers the interplay between thoughts, behaviors, and emotions and is highly effective in treating depression and anxiety disorders.
“I am Death, and I have come to take you with me.” Thinking fast, Aunty Misery said, “All right, but before I go, I would like to pluck some pears from my beloved tree to remember how much pleasure it brought to me in this life. But I am a very old woman and cannot climb to the tallest branches where the best fruit is. Will you be so kind as to do it for me?” With a heavy sigh like wind through a tomb, Senor Death climbed the pear tree. Immediately he became stuck to it as if with glue. And no matter how much he cursed and threatened, Aunty Misery would not allow the tree to release Death. —“Aunty Misery,” Judith Ortiz Cofer
Which two things are personified in the folktale?
trees
misery
children
pears
death.
Answer:
misery and death
Answer:
b and e
Explanation:
correct on test
Missouri’s application for statehood in 1819 raised the issue of whether slavery
This where The Missouri Compromise of 1820 comes from.
Jalesa is helping her daughter learn the colors of the rainbow for her quiz at school. To help her remember the colors and order, she tells her daughter to remember Roy G. Biv. When her daughter says, "But who's Roy G. Biv?" Jalesa explains that it stands for Red, Orange, Yellow, Green, Blue, Indigo, and Violet. Jalesa is teaching her daughter ____
Answer:
Jalesa is helping her daughter learn the colors of the rainbow for her quiz at school. To help her remember the colors and order, she tells her daughter to remember Roy G. Biv. When her daughter says, "But who's Roy G. Biv?" Jalesa explains that it stands for Red, Orange, Yellow, Green, Blue, Indigo, and Violet. . Jalesa is teaching her daughter a mnemonic.
Explanation:
Mnemonics are the memory tools that serve as bridges to help you recall information and concepts from long-term memory. They involve creating some form of an association. Best if used onl for information that is difficult to recall. Acronyms are a kind of pnemonics which involves a word or a phrase using the first letter of the key words in a list of items to remember.
For example: Roy G. Biv stands for Red, Orange, Yellow, Green, Blue, Indigo, and Violet.
Hence, Jalesa is teaching her daughter a mnemonic.
Vanessa is impulsive, has an unstable sense of self, and is intensely fearful of abandonment. She wants to have close relationships but her emotions are often inappropriate and excessive with a pattern of self-destructiveness, chronic loneliness, and disruptive anger. Vanessa is suffering from ________ personality disorder.
Answer:
Borderline personality disorder
Explanation:
Borderline personality disorder is a mental health disorder that impacts an individuals sense of self and others, causing problems functioning in everyday life. It includes self-image issues, difficulty managing emotions and behavior, and a pattern of unstable relationships.
An individual suffering from this disorder has an intense fear of abandonment or instability, a desire for a close relationship, but yet inappropriate anger, impulsiveness and frequent mood swings tends to destroy his/her chances of a lasting relationship.
Vanessa's symptoms are characteristic of an individual suffering from borderline personality disorder.
Answer: Vanessa is suffering from Borderline personality disorder.
Explanation: Borderline personality disorder can be defined as a disorder characterized by extreme black and white thinking and instability in self-image and emotions. People with this disorder often abuse substances such as alcohol or drugs and frequently put themselves at risk.
A behaviorist would explain why one student responds positively to receiving a B on a test while another student responds negatively to a B by noting that: A. One student has more self-efficacy than the other B. One student has a stronger superego than the other C. The students have different learning histories D. The students have different personality traits
Answer:
Option a
Explanation:
Self-efficacy relates to the confidence of an person in their ability to perform activities required to generate particular performance achievements. Self-efficacy represents faith in the capacity to exercise control of one's own inspiration, actions and physical environment.
Thus , self efficacy place a major role in an individuals expectation from his or her present and future. Therefore, the student getting B is happy as he might be expecting lower grades while the unhappy one might be expected higher.
Heath has finally completed the data collection portion of his project. He immediately begins analyzing his data using an analysis of variance, as he previously planned; however, he quickly learns that his results are not significant (p =.06). Heath is frustrated because the results were "very close" to being significant. He decides to try conducting a multiple regression analysis and is pleased to see that his results are significant (p =.04). Because the significant levels were so close, Heath doesn't bother reporting that he conducted the analysis of variance in his paper, as he thinks that clearly multiple regression was the correct test to run. Heath could be accused of which poor research practice
Answer:
false
Explanation:
In this kind of scenario
heath is already aware of the mistake he made and is the reason for him not bordering to report.
hence, heath could be accused of a False research practice
Answer: p-hacking
Explanation: By failing to report that he ran a different statistical test, Heath may be presenting a finding that is not replicable. Heath should report all of his statistical results, along with the effect sizes, to give others a better understanding of his thought process.
Sam is chronically getting in trouble at school. He fights with other boys, has destroyed school property, and cheats on his assignments. Sam also has been arrested by the local police for setting fires and stealing. Sam most likely would be diagnosed with ____.
Answer:
Conduct Disorder.
Explanation:
Conduct disorder is a behavioral disorder diagnosed in adolescents. It is a repetitive behavioral pattern in which adolescents lack empathy, their behavior is anti-social and break the rules. A child diagnosed with conduct disorder tend to reveal threatening conditions fo themselves and others as well.
In the given case, Sam will be diagnosed with conduct disorder. It is because his behavior reveals the symptoms of conduct disorder. He fights with other boys (threatening for others) and destroyed school property, and cheats. All these symptoms are of conduct disorder.
Thus, the correct answer is conduct disorder.
Sixteen-year-old Geneva believes that the death penalty is wrong because her parents, friends, and church say so. She has never really thought about the issue, but she has accepted this view as her own. This pattern of following what her parents and peers say and do is pervasive throughout most of her beliefs and behaviors. Which identity state do you think Geneva is in?
Question Options:
A. achievement
B. foreclosure
C. diffusion
D. moratorium
Answer: Geneva is most likely in the Foreclosure identity state.
Explanation: Foreclosure can be defined as a situation whereby an individual think they they know them self but have not really explored all their available options yet. For an individual to really know them self, they must go through a crisis of personal identity first. Any individual that does not go through the crisis have committed to an identity too early.
Kayla has descended from the Mangaia of Polynesia. In her culture, it is very important that a woman is sexually satisfied by her partner. Which of the following is a likely consequence if this does not happen?
The woman leaves her partner and ruins his reputation.a higher likelihood of homosexual orientationtranssexuality.
Answer:
The answer is The woman leaves her partner and ruins his reputation.
Explanation:
In the life of all married people, it is the expectation of all women that they would be satisfied by their husband. Since the culture of Kayla recognised this by virtue of being a decendant of Mangaia, she would definitely expect her husband to leave up to expectation in being satisfied sexually.
If this did not happen, she would leave her partner as a consequence of her unfulfilment. This would lead to the running of the reputation of her partner because people would start to assume that he has an existing medical condition hence the reason why his wife left him.
Answer:
The woman leaves her partner and ruins his reputation.
Explanation:
The Mangaia tribe is characterized by the male and the female sex having high sexual drive. usually about 13/14years of age, undergo different rituals, boys are lectured on ways and methods in pleasing a girl; erotic kissing, cunnilingus, the use of sexually experienced woman to have sexual intercourse with the boy teach him more on how to satisfy a woman. if the intended partner fails to satisfy her, she may want to leave him which may also ruin his reputation.
Aaron used to think that life wasn't worth living, and then his son almost died. Now, he has taught himself to appreciate life and all it has to offer, and he is optimistic about life. Because of this, chances are that: A. He will need therapy. B. He will have better health. C. His problems will return. D. He will become self-actualized
The answer is he will have better health.
Aaron used to think that life wasn't worth living, and then his son almost died. Now, he has taught himself to appreciate life and all it has to offer, and he is optimistic about life. Because of this, chances are that He will have better health. Thus the correct option is B.
What is Optimistic Thinking?Optimistic thinking refers to being positive and hopeful toward events. It is said that the thinking of an individual affects the result of any event both in a positive and negative manner.
In the given case, it explains that before his son nearly passed away, Aaron used to believe that life wasn't worth living. He has now learned to value life and all that it has to offer, and he now has a positive outlook on it.
When opposed to more judgmental people, those that are optimistic are more dedicated to their goals, more successful in reaching their goals, happier with their lives, and in better physical and mental health.
Therefore, option B is appropriate.
learn more about optimistic thinking, here:
https://brainly.com/question/2667206
#SPJ5
Who believed that we have no reason to postulate the existence of any external physical reality, and that all that exists are the mental sensations and ideas that we experience and the minds in which we experience them?
Answer:
John Locke
Explanation:
John Locke was a British philosopher, who was born in 1632 and died in 1704.
He believes that “all ideas come from sensation and reflection” and that all knowledge is founded on experience and argues that the human mind doesn't have innate, intuitive ideas, but much rather humans are born with reasoning.
This is different from other scientists that believed in dualism.
In conclusion, John Locke claimed that the mind is in a blank state at birth and believed that knowledge is gained through experience.
Can you help me with some of the questions please?
It is criminlogy for dual diploma: Unit eight, lab questions
7. What did the FBI find when they searched Ivins' home and office? How did these findings complicate the case?
8. What happened to Ivins? Was the FBI to blame for this?
9. When the FBI gave it's evidence to an independent lab, what did this lab find? What problems does this have for the FBI's case against Ivins?
10. According to critics, what are the mistakes that the FBI and other investigators made in the anthrax case? Why might these mistakes have been made?
Answer:
Gun range, girls underwear, all sorts of strange things. There was no hard evidence that he committed the crime which made it difficult to prosecute him.
Ivins was put under periodic surveillance and an FBI document stated that he was "an extremely sensitive suspect in the 2001 anthrax attacks". On July 29, 2008, Ivins committed with an overdose of acetaminophen
The 77-page report from the Government Accountability Office says the FBI's research, including novel microbial forensic tests, did not provide a full understanding of how bacteria change in their natural environment and in a laboratory. This failure to grasp the reason for genetic mutations that were used to differentiate between samples of anthrax bacteria was a "key scientific gap" in the investigation, the report says.
The GAO also found a lack of rigorous controls over sampling procedures and a failure to cite the degree of uncertainty in measurement tools used to identify genetic markers.
"Although the complexity and novelty of the scientific methods at the time of the FBI's investigation made it challenging for the FBI to adequately address all these problems, the agency could have improved its approach," the report said.
The GAO report confirms what I have often said — that the FBI's definitive conclusions about the accuracy of their scientific findings in the Amerithrax case are not, in fact, definitive," Holt said in a written statement.
An acclaimed government scientist who assisted the federal investigation of the 2001 anthrax mailings said Tuesday that he erred seven years ago when he told top Bush administration officials that material he examined probably had been altered to make it more deadly.
The scientist, Peter B. Jahrling, had observed anthrax spores with the aid of an electron microscope at the government’s biological warfare research facility at Ft. Detrick, Md
Explanation:
The presence of silicon was viewed with alarm because the material, if artificially added to the anthrax, would make it more buoyant in air and more capable of penetrating deeply into the lungs.
“I believe I made an honest mistake,” Jahrling said in response to questions e-mailed to him for this article, adding that he had been “overly impressed” by what he thought he saw under the microscope.
“I should never have ventured into this area,” said Jahrling, who is a virologist, referring to his analysis of the anthrax, which is a bacterium. Jahrling’s initial analysis -- and his briefing of officials at the White House
At Tuesday’s hearing, a member of the House Judiciary Committee, Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.), pressed Mueller anew about how the silicon got into the spores.
After being informed of the events at the hearing, Jahrling renounced his earlier analysis.
“In retrospect,” Jahrling said, “I believe I was mistaken and defer to the experts.”
Answer:
to the qustion How many field offices does the FBI currently have?
the answer is 56
Explanation:
Data saturation is a situation that occurs in qualitative research when a. data collection stops when no new information is obtained and the data collected becomes repetitive. b. a specialized data analysis method is implemented. c. it becomes necessary to implement a method for eliminating data once it has been repeated more than three times. d. the number of participants selected for the study becomes higher than needed.
Answer: Option(a) is correct option
Explanation:
In terms of qualitative research, data saturation is signified through enough quantity and quantity of data information for repetition. When no new information is seen in data then it is saturation point where repetition of data takes place.New data gathering stops in such case.
Other options are incorrect because data saturation is not seen when special data analysis method is used, for elimination of data that has been repeated more than three times and number of participants are more than required .Thus, the correct option is option(a).
Ramon is taking a final exam. When he reaches the first question to which he does not know the answer, he begins worrying that he will miss the other questions too, which will result in his failing the test, which will result in his failing the class, which will result in his flunking out of school, which will abruptly terminate his future career as a lawyer. His cognitive error is ____
Answer:
magnification
Explanation:
Magnification in cognitive error has to do with exaggerating the significance of an attribute/event/or sensation, hence magnifying the negative.
What is an accurate description of the american federal system?
Answer:
The statement that accurately describes the American federal system is that the federal and state governments share powers, but federal has the majority.
Explanation:
Answer:
The statement that accurately describes the American federal system is that the federal and state governments share powers, but federal has the majority.
Explanation:
.
James is asked about what is the best way to study for an exam. He responds that the best way to study is by making flashcards. He easily thinks of all the times he used flashcards and he made A's. However, he fails to take into consideration all the times he made A's and did not use flashcards and the times he used flashcards and did not do well.
His faulty thinking is an example of:
a. Oversimplification bias.
b. Availability heuristic.
c. Present/present bias.
d. Asking biased questions.
e. Cherry-picking evidence.
Answer:
Oversimplification bias.
b. Availability heuristic.
c. Present/present bias.
d. Asking biased questions.
e. Cherry-picking evidence.
During the past several months, Diah has lost trust in her manager, Casey, due to some of his decisions regarding his employees. He is now trying to change the way employees report their time and are paid. What is the most likely reaction Diah will have to this change?
Answer:
Diah would most likely see the changes adopted by her manager as a way to way to further treat the employees bad. In her company, Diah might have believed that, Casey is treating the staff (including her ) bad hence the lack of trust.
She would try to oppose the changes that was to be introduced inorder to get back to her manager,Casey.
Explanation:
While Clara Novak was sick, her daughter helped her in many ways. Clara died, and Janie then claimed that she was entitled to be paid for the ser- vices she had rendered her mother. This claim was opposed by three brothers and sisters who also ren- dered services to the mother. They claimed that Janie was barred because of the presumption that services rendered between family members are gratuitous. Janie claimed that this presumption was not appli- cable because she had not lived with her mother but had her own house. Was Janie correct?
Answer:
No Janie is not correct
Explanation:
No Janie is not correct, it is reasonable to view the services provided as a gratuitous service. Janie not living with her mother does not change the fact that the services provided is seen as charity or a gift. You can give a gift of service without having to live with the person receiving said services and besides there was no contact or agreement of payment to this effect when the services were happening. Janie, if she wanted to do so should have entered into an agreement first, she cannot do something for free and later charge for that service without an agreement before the service was provided.
Three-year-old Dawn is given a brownie. She gets upset and says that she wants "more." So her father cuts the brownie into two pieces, and now Dawn is happier. Dawn's thinking shows that she has not yet learned to do what?
Answer:
Conserve
Explanation:
Conservation refers to a critical reasoning capacity that in children during the preoperative stage of their development, but evolves in the concrete operational stage, it's a period in which the child can recognize that altering the shape of a material or entity does not alter its number, total volume or weight.
Dawn couldn't recognize the difference in the brownie after her father had cuted it, she tells it's now bigger and she is happier. Dawn's thinking shows that she has not yet learned to CONSERVE and recognize when things are changed and altered.
Conservation relates to a rational thinking ability which, according to psychologist Jean Piaget, allows a individual to decide that a certain amount will remain the same despite modification of the container, shape or apparent size.
Answer :
Conserve
Explanation :
Jon has not learned to conserve according to the theory of jean Piaget.
Conservation in his theory refers to a logical thinking ability that is underdeveloped in the preoperational stage of development which allows a person to understand/determine that an amount or quantity of something will not change even though the container, shape or size of that thing changes. ,