The Mongols were a nomadic tribe to the north of China. They shared the mountainous areas between China and Siberia with many other such tribes, many of them Turkic.
Final answer:
The Mongols originated from the grasslands and mountains northwest of the Gobi Desert in East Asia, living a nomadic lifestyle before turning their attention to China under Möngke Khan's rule and later establishing the Yuan dynasty.
Explanation:
Before invading China, the Mongols lived in the grasslands and mountains northwest of the Gobi Desert of East Asia. They were a nomadic, tribal, and largely illiterate society, sustained economically by their herds and occasional raiding. Living in a state of near-constant low-level conflicts among themselves over resources such as pastures and water, the Mongols thrived in a harsh environment that molded them into formidable warriors. Despite being neighbors to the wealthy and relatively close Chinese territories ruled by the Song dynasty, it was not until Möngke Khan's leadership that they turned their focus on China.
The Mongol military campaigns, famously led by Genghis Khan and then his descendants, stretched their empire across much of Eurasia, creating the largest contiguous land empire in history. These conquests included territories such as the Persian lands of the Abbasid Caliphate in Baghdad and contact with the Mamluks in Cairo, culminating with Kublai Khan's conquest of China, establishing the Yuan dynasty.
Why did the unemployment rate go down from 1933 to 1937?
How did the 2nd Red Scare in the U.S. affect Americans and/or American culture
Answer:The Second Red Scare profoundly altered the temper of American society. In 1954 congress passed the Communist Control Act of 1954 which prevented members of the communist party in America from holding office in labor unions and other labor organizations.
Explanation:
The most important outcome of the Adams-Onis Treaty of 1821 was that
Answer:
The most important outcome of the Adams-Onis Treaty of 1821 was Florida was acquired by the United States. The treaty was considered as a victory for North America. Florida had already become an emerging problem for Spain by then.
Please Help with the Character Counts question. I will Give Brainliest Answer to a very good answer that answers the question good.
How many United States businesses does the Port of Savannah serve?
Answer:
8.6% of the United states businesses. Port of Savannah is the 3rd fasted growing port in the nation
Explanation:
Really hope this helps :)
Final answer:
The information provided does not specify the number of businesses the Port of Savannah serves. Instead, it emphasizes the concentration of shipping activities in top U.S. ports and the impact of regulations like the Jones Act on maritime trade.
Explanation:
While the provided reference material does not directly answer the question of how many United States businesses the Port of Savannah serves, it does provide insight into the significant role of ports in the United States economy and the extensive network they support. Unfortunately, your question about the specific number of businesses served by the Port of Savannah cannot be answered with the information available. The references do highlight the importance of ports and the complex regulations such as the Jones Act that govern maritime trade, which could indirectly affect the number of businesses a port can serve due to restrictions on cargo movement between U.S. ports.
Notable Points from the Reference Material:
The top 20 ports in the U.S. received 81.6% of total ballast water (BW) discharge from overseas between 2011-2013, which indicates the high concentration of maritime activities in select ports.Regulations like the Jones Act influence trade by prohibiting foreign ships from transporting goods between two U.S. ports, impacting service trade opportunities.New Orleans, Houston, and Hampton Roads were the top ports by volume of BW discharged, highlighting the clustering of maritime activities in a few strategic ports.
Compare and contrast Fulgencio Batista and Fidel Castro. What was similar about their rules? What was different?
Answer:
well both were dictators (that is for sure) but both of them had different mindsets of how they were going to lead the people of Cuba.
Explanation:
Castro, while no saint, had a love of his people and his country at heart while Batista had contempt for the citizens of Cuba, whose only purpose was to make him rich and the wealthy of Cuba wealthier.
Castro stood up against the bullying of the United States, which is in itself an accomplishment, which is why the U.S. hated him. Rest in peace, Castro.
In thinking about Cuba and the U.S.’s support of its dictator, Fulgencio Batista, I am reminded that Cuba was a brothel to the world; gambling was controlled by the U.S. mafia, banks were controlled and owned by U.S. banks.
Under Castro, Cuba became almost more literate and took its literacy campaign to many countries, as well as sending its doctors to assist them. Infant mortality in Cuba dropped. Hopefully The Bee will present an appraisal that reflects on these and so many other issues.
One effect of the Dawes Act of 1887 was that many American Indians
OA. rented their land to white settlers and kept their cultural traditions.
OB. sold their land and were forced to move to urban areas.
C. lost their tribal lands and their sense of cultural identity.
OD. became wealthy landowners with large farms and ranches.
Reset
Submit
Answer: The correct answer is C- lost their tribal lands and their sense of cultural identity.
Explanation:
The Dawes Act of 1887 resulted in Native Americans losing their tribal lands and sense of cultural identity.
Explanation:The Dawes Act of 1887 had a significant impact on American Indians, with one effect being that they lost their tribal lands and their sense of cultural identity. The Act sought to assimilate Native Americans into mainstream American society by encouraging private land ownership and farming. Under the Dawes Act, tribal lands were divided into individual allotments, which were then allocated to Native American families. However, many of these allotted lands were later sold to white settlers and corporations, resulting in the loss of collective tribal ownership and the erosion of cultural traditions.
Learn more about Impact of the Dawes Act on American Indians here:https://brainly.com/question/14823362
#SPJ6
who invented the counting principle in probability?
Blaise Pascal
Explanation:
Final answer:
Blaise Pascal is a key figure associated with the development of probability theory, although the counting principle in probability is a product of collective contributions from many mathematicians. His work, alongside the broader concept embodied in Big Idea 7, highlights the role of probability in describing complex and quantum systems.
Explanation:
The concept of the counting principle in probability cannot be attributed to a single individual but has developed over time through the work of many mathematicians. However, one of the notable figures in the development of probability theory is the French mathematician Blaise Pascal. Pascal's contributions to the field of probability were significant, especially his work on the problems of points, which later contributed to the formulation of the classical interpretation of probability. Pascal is also known for his contributions in other areas such as number theory and for inventing the first mechanical digital calculator.
Moreover, the fields of probability and statistics often leverage Big Idea 7, which states that the mathematics of probability can be utilized to describe the behavior of complex systems, including quantum mechanical systems. This principle illustrates the profound impact probability has in various realms of science and mathematics. The intersection between empirical observations, like those made by Karl Pearson in coin tossing, and theoretical probabilities is fundamental to the comprehension of probability as a tool to quantify randomness and order within systems.
1. Evaluate the extent to which the attitudes of Christians towards merchants and trade differed from the attitude
of Muslims toward merchants and trade from the religions' origins until 1450.
Answer:
From their founding till the year 1450 AD, Christianity and Islam had very different views on business, trade and merchants.
Explanation:
As a general rule, Islam was mostly favoured free trade and believed controlling prices was against Islamic teachings. Business was seen as work of labour and many cited even the Prophet of Islam himself being a merchant in his early days.
Christianity, on the other hand, viewed the rich, trading class as something that was not encouraged by the church. This was especially true because Mathew, in the new testament had stated how a rich man will never go to heaven.
These attitudes however began to change by the 14th Century. Many scholars of Islam who had seen immense wealth and inequality in their countries began to be critical of trade itself.
However, Christians of Europe, who were mostly poorer, became more entrepreneurial and wanted to trade and earn a better living. As more and more people became Rich in places like Florence, Church donations also increased and the traditional religious objections began to disappear.
Once an election has moved past the primary stage, a political party's role changes. All of the following are roles of
political parties during general elections EXCEPT:
Some basic roles of political parties are : assisting the electoral process, organizing the government and nominating candidates for election.
Explanation:
Political party comprises of group of people who shares same ideology about the function and scope of government.
Party who wins election gains control over the government. For this, each party is supposed to nominate candidates for a position in government.
Nomination of respective political parties candidates takes place in primary stage of election. These nominees are decided by voters vote.
Once the candidate is nominated, they need to work individually and are supposed to make their own campaign to win the general election and be in government. Here, role of their political party is very less.
Why might the theme of the human disfigurement be especially powerful to the generation that lived through the world war 1?
World War I, due to its unprecedented scale and destruction, resulted in widespread disfigurement both physically and emotionally. As a result, the generation living through it dealt with the direct impacts of the war and reflected this in their arts and literature. They also began criticizing traditional societal norms and questioning the authority of elites.
Explanation:The theme of human disfigurement might have been especially powerful to the generation that lived through World War I due to the unprecedented scale and horror of the war. Literary and visual works of the era, such as those by poets Wilfred Owen and Siegfried Sassoon, and German artist Käthe Kollwitz, displayed the inhumanity and suffering brought by the war. The sight of veterans returning home with both physical and emotional scars was a grim reminder of the toll the war took on human bodies and minds.
The war caused significant loss of life- approximately nine to ten million military casualties and about ten million civilian deaths. Many survivors faced department, leading to a need for prosthetics and physical therapy. This widespread human disfigurement led to introspection and criticism of the authority of elites and the idea of inevitable human progress.
As World War I used advanced weaponry and caused massive destruction, different aspects of human lives were impacted than in past conflicts. Entire nations and even civilians had to bear the brunt of the war, leading to a different level of engagement and suffering. The massive number of casualties, many of whom required advanced medical care or prosthetics, were a stark reminder of the war's devastating impact on individuals.
Learn more about Impact of World War I here:https://brainly.com/question/29637002
#SPJ11
Final answer:
The theme of human disfigurement was powerful to those who lived through World War I because it symbolized the brutal impact of the war on individuals, the disillusionment with pre-war ideologies, and it was depicted in art that expressed the profound cultural and psychological shifts of the time.
Explanation:
The theme of human disfigurement resonated strongly with the generation that experienced World War I due to the unprecedented scale of carnage and injury. The war shattered the sense of invulnerability and progress that characterized the pre-war era. As a response, many artists and writers conveyed the psychological and physical trauma through their works. For instance, poets like Wilfred Owen and artists like Käthe Kollwitz, who had personal losses in the war, expressed the raw and unfiltered reality of the battlefield, without the glorification often associated with war.
The sheer number of soldiers returning home with lasting wounds, both visible and invisible, made themes such as disfigurement especially powerful and relatable. This reality led to a collective questioning of former societal beliefs and the ideologies that endorsed the war, including the optimistic view of technological progress that was prevalent before the conflict.
The modernist movement gained further momentum in the aftermath due to the war's effect on traditional forms of expression. The conflict became a catalyst for artists to abandon older forms and techniques, which seemed inadequate to express the new, grim realities. In the face of a mechanized modern world, the broken bodies and minds of soldiers became symbols of a broader cultural and existential crisis. As such, artwork like Edvard Munch's "The Scream" represents the inner turmoil and anxiety of the time, becoming iconic symbols of a generation grappling with its disillusionment and the vastly altered landscape of the post-war period.
What lessons do you think we can learn from the 1918 Influenza that can help us deal with today's pandemic?
Answer:
We can learn about how the virus spread, how to prevent it from spreading, how to protect ourselves and others, how to find a cure, and how to find vaccinations.
Explanation:
the 1918 Influenza was a great learning curve in the history of viruses and is helping shape the cures and vaccinations for the coronavirus today.
what arguments does Barnes have against the Treaty of Versailles
Answer:
By 1926, Barnes argued that Russia and France bore the entire responsibility for the outbreak of war in 1914, and the Central Powers none. ... The centre's sole purpose was to prove Germany was the victim of aggression in 1914, and that the Versailles treaty was morally invalid.
Explanation:
The United States and the Soviet Union used the concept of rocket propulsion in combination with nuclear weapons during the Cold War. Which
country had originally used rocket propulsion to its advantage during World War II?
OA Japan
B. China
OC Germany
D.
France
Answer: Germany
Hitler and the Third Reich used rocket propulsion very much during World War 2 using it in multiple weapons such as the V-1, The ME-163 komet and the most prominent the V-2. Fun fact: The Nazis where the first people to send something into space. They used the V-2
How do the writing materials left behind by the
Greeks and Romans contribute to what we know
about them today?
Answer:
It helps us understand how much more advanced they were.
Explanation:
This helps us know how advanced they were to have an entire written language. Also the Greeks and Romans built things we cannot build today. This leads to people thinking aliens were on this planet. In fact we still learn from them today. They found out angle measurement in math and we use many tools today invented by the romans and greeks.
Writing materials left by the Greeks and Romans provide substantial information about their societies' governments, religions, cultures, and daily life. Texts from characters like Plato and Aristotle influenced Western philosophy, whilst Roman texts provide insight into their legal codes and government.
Explanation:The writing materials left behind by the Greeks and Romans provide a wealth of information about their societies that have shaped and greatly contributed to our understanding of their civilizations. These writings, whether they be detailed epics, personal letters, legal documents, or philosophical treatise, allow contemporary researchers to gain insight on a variety of different aspects of ancient Greek and Roman life such as their government, religion, culture, and daily life.
For example, ancient Greek texts, like those penned by great philosophers such as Plato and Aristotle, have tremendously influenced the Western philosophical thought. These writings help us understand their thoughts, beliefs, and views. Similarly, Roman texts, like the legal writings and historical accounts, help us dissect their political and administrative systems and allow us to understand their legal codes and governmental structures.
Learn more about Writing materials of Greeks and Romans here:https://brainly.com/question/32679018
#SPJ2
The United Nations intervened in North Korea because the
A.) South Koreans invaded North Korea
B.) North Koreans invaded South Korea
C.) Soviets backed the South Korean government
D.) Chinese invaded the Korean Peninsula
Answer:
B.) North Koreans invaded South Korea
Explanation:
The Korean war was because the Soviets broke apart the country and backed the North Koreans. Americans backed South Korea. A war ensued. The North Koreans were pushed back.
Answer:
its B
Explanation:
I TOOK THE TEST
What was an effect of the plague on Europe?
Choose all answers that are correct.
Answer:
2 and 3
Explanation:
I know things also i go to k12
Thinkers of the scientific revolution believed that:
A. the physical world follows natural laws.
B. truth is best found in old ideas.
C. research is less important than strong belief,
D. the physical world is best explained by religion.
Answer: the physical world follows natural laws!! (Apex) :)
Explanation:
Was the United States led effort to oust Iraq from Kuwait a prudent one?
Answer:
Yes, United States effort to oust Iraq from Kuwait was a prudent action.Explanation:
As Saddam Hussein's army invaded Kuwait on August 2, 1990, the Saudi Arabian king and Kuwait's government turned towards the United States to seek for its support.
This invasion was condemned by the whole international community and many countries sought to form an alliance if Iraq did not withdrew its armies from Kuwait.
With Iraq's failure to withdraw its army from Kuwait, the U.S along with several other nations led a coalition, Operation Desert Storm, against the Iraqi forces. The mission was successful and Saddam Hussein and his army was made to sign a peace agreement ending the Gulf War.
This proves that U.S had lived its goal of rendering help to countries that are affected by fascist or authoritarian governments and has remain committed to the policy of Truman Doctrine.
The United States effort to oust Iraq from Kuwait was a prudent one., because it freed Kuwait from Iraq.
The United States in IraqThe war happened in response to the reaction to Hussein's aggression and occupying Kuwait.
Kuwait was the supplier of oil to the United States and other countries.
The Iraqi seizure of Kuwait posed a direct threat to Saudi Arabia.
America decided to enter the war to end the Dictatorship of Saddam Hussein in Iraq and save Saudi Arabia.
Learn more about the Gulf War here:
brainly.com/question/1105731
How does industrialization occur in Great Britain?
How much of the world's population is in Asia?
1/5
4/5
02/5
3/5
What were the major events and turning points of World war 2
1939: Hitler invades Poland. Hitlers invasion of Poland on 1st September 1939 marked the beginning of WW2 in Europe.
Germany declares war on the U.S.
Germany invaded Poland
Germany invaded France and captured Paris.
The major events and turning points of World War II include Germany's and Italy's invasion of various countries, the United States entering the war after Pearl Harbor, the D-Day invasion by the Allies, and the Battle of Midway in the Pacific. The end of the war saw the first use of nuclear bombs, the signing of the UN Charter, and the commencement of the Nuremberg and Tokyo war crimes trials.
Explanation:The major events and turning points of World War II include the rise of fascism in Germany and Italy, and the subsequent invasions of various countries including Poland, France, and the Soviet Union. The United States entered the war after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941, marking a significant shift in the conflict. Another major turning point in Europe was the successful cross-channel invasion of Europe through France by the Allies in 1944, known as D-Day, which helped to divert German forces from the eastern front while Russian forces pushed the Germans out of the Soviet Union.
In the Pacific, the Japanese invasion of the Philippines and various other regions of Asia was a significant event, and the Battle of Midway in 1942 marked a major turning point as it stopped Japan's advance across the Pacific. The end of the war was marked by the dropping of the first nuclear bombs in Hiroshima and Nagasaki by the United States, forcing Japan to surrender and initiating a new phase in human history.
In the aftermath of World War II, significant developments included the signing of the Charter of the United Nations in San Francisco, California, in 1945, the Nuremberg and Tokyo war crimes trials, the implementation of the Marshall Plan to rebuild Europe, and the formation of NATO to offer a cross-national military shield for Western Europe.
Learn more about World War II here:https://brainly.com/question/7589784
#SPJ12
• Can society be improved by active involvement or by withdrawal?
What policies kept the U.S. from entering World War I when it began?
Question options:
The Monroe Doctrine and anti-imperialism
Imperialism and democracy
Isolationism and neutrality
Answer:
isolationism and neutrality
what was the result of the xyz affair?
A. it occurred when adams offended french negotiators
B. it roused public sentiment against france
C. it prompted the lowering of taxes on stamps and land
D. it led congress to decrease the size of the army
Answer:
D. it led congress to decrease the size of the army
Final answer:
The XYZ Affair resulted in heightened public sentiment against France, leading to increased federalist measures like the Alien and Sedition Acts, and despite eventually achieving a peaceful resolution, it caused a domestic backlash against President Adams.
Explanation:
The result of the XYZ Affair was B. It roused public sentiment against France. When President John Adams disclosed the French attempt to extract a bribe from American negotiators, known as the XYZ Affair, it led to widespread public outrage against France. Following these events, federalists increased opposition to France, resulting in the controversial Alien and Sedition Acts and fanning the flames of partisan politics.
In contrast to bringing the two nations closer to war, Adams pursued a more moderate course, eventually leading to peaceful negotiations and a new treaty with France, though not without domestic backlash against his administration.
3 facts about the legislative branch, executive branch and judicial branch.
Answer:
Explanation:
The legislative branch
has 2 senators from each state
make laws
approves presidential appointments
the executive branch
enforces laws
approves bills
votes bills
the judicial
decides if laws a constitutional
are appointed by the president
there are 9 of em
The U.S. Government is divided into three branches: the legislative branch makes laws and includes Congress; the executive branch enforces laws and is led by the President; and the judicial branch interprets laws and is headlined by the Supreme Court.
Explanation:Three Branches of Government
The United States Government is founded on the principle of federalism, where power is divided among three distinct branches: the legislative, executive, and judicial branches. This separation of powers ensures a system of checks and balances, so no single branch becomes too powerful.
Legislative BranchThe legislative branch is outlined in Article I of the Constitution and is responsible for making laws. It is composed of two houses: the Senate and the House of Representatives.Senators serve six-year terms, and members of the House serve two-year terms.The legislative branch has the power to declare war, levy taxes, and regulate commerce.Executive BranchArticle II of the Constitution establishes the executive branch, which is responsible for enforcing laws. It is headed by the President, who serves a four-year term.The President is also Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces and has the authority to veto bills.The executive branch includes independent executive agencies that enforce and regulate government policies.Judicial BranchArticle III sets up the judicial branch, whose primary function is to interpret the Constitution and evaluate laws.The highest court is the Supreme Court, whose justices serve for life or until they choose to retire.The judicial branch has the power to oversee court cases that interpret guaranteed rights and ensure due process.
based on the map how do the crude oil resource in north America compare with the rest of the world
Answer:
C. North America has less crude oil than Saudi Arabia and other countries in Asia.
Explanation:
Answer:
C.) North America has less crude oil than Saudi Arabia and other countries in Asia.
Explanation:
The map shows that the United States and Mexico have 3.8 billion and 1.8 billion tons of crude oil, for a total of 5.6 billion tons of crude oil in North America. Compared to countries like Saudi Arabia (which has 36 billion tons) and even Venezuela (11.2 billion tons) North America has less crude oil than other areas of the world.
[This is straight from the FLVS test for 5.03 and here is my overall grade for the test:
100 %
Score: 27 of 27 points]
which statement best summarizes what Jerome
thinks about Rome before its fall?
A. Jerome sees Rome as strong.
B. Jerome sees a bright future for Rome.
C. Jerome sees Rome as weak.
D. Jerome sees that Rome is in danger.
Answer:
A.Jerome sees Rome as strong.
Explanation:
because he is seeing it before it falls and not after it falls
Answer:
Answer is A!
Explanation:
My other answer was deleted for some reason, I don't know why.
Senator John C. Calhoun would most likely agree with which of the following statements?
A. States' rights are more important than preserving the Union.
B. Preserving the Union is more important than states' rights.
C. The federal government should have the power to decide whether states allow slavery.
D. New territories should be allowed to determine for themselves whether to allow slavery.
Answer:
I would say A or B im leading to A
John C. Calhoun was a strong defender of states' rights. He would most likely agree that states' rights are more important than preserving the Union, as he believed in the concept of nullification and the right of states to self-govern.
Explanation:Senator John C. Calhoun was a staunch defender of states' rights during his time. This means he would most likely agree with the statement A. States' rights are more important than preserving the Union. Calhoun was known for advocating the concept of nullification, which allows states to reject federal laws they believe infringes their rights. He believed in the right of states to govern themselves without federal interference. While he valued the Union, he believed the protection of states' rights was paramount to preserving it.
Learn more about John C. Calhoun here:https://brainly.com/question/34565603
#SPJ11
9. Number the events in chronological order.
Pompey dies in Egypt after fleeing Italy.
Julius Caesar is murdered in the Senate.
Octavian is named Augustus by the Senate.
Julius Caesar crosses the Rubicon River into Italy.
Antony dies in Egypt after losing to Octavian's forces at Actium.
1 Julius Caesar crosses the Rubicon River into Italy.
2.Pompey dies in Egypt after fleeing Italy.
3.Julius Caesar is murdered in the Senate
4.Octavian is named Augustus by the Senate.
5.Antony dies in Egypt after losing to Octavian's forces at Actium.