Which example highlights the impact of the Lend-Lease Act?

it overruled “cash and carry” enabling the US to loan weapons and supplies to countries vital to the defense of the US


it allowed the Germans to transfer money to secret accounts in the US to avoid paying penalties for World War 1


it encouraged wealthy landowners in the west to lease their land to the poor so that they could have employment in agriculture


it was the first formal step in declaring war on Japan after the attack at Pearl Harbor

The answer is B. A contract in which land was granted to the peasants in exchange for military service to the nobles. :}

I took this quiz before and passed it! :}

Answer:

D. a contract in which land was granted to the peasants in exchange for military service to the nobles.

Explanation:

i am taking the test rn in study island :)

-Chilly

One effect of white flight is that cities become poorer.

It involves the movement of people especially the white from a well populates place with modernization called Urban area to a place that is less modernized.

Minor populations are mostly involved in it.

Therefore, One effect of white flight is that cities become poorer.

Learn more on white flight here,

https://brainly.com/question/6362376

#SPJ2

The Pilgrims and Puritans settled in North America to seek religious freedom and create communities based on Calvinist beliefs, separate from the Church of England.

Many of the original English colonists, such as the Pilgrims and the Puritans, were religious separatists seeking to establish colonies in North America. They were motivated by a desire to practice their religion freely and to create communities based on their Calvinist beliefs, which differed from the practices of the Church of England. The Puritans aimed to 'purify' the Church from what they saw as Catholic elements, whereas the Pilgrims, who were Separatists, sought a complete break from the Church. The Pilgrims initially migrated to the Dutch Republic in search of religious freedom but decided to move to North America to maintain their English identity and to escape potential conflicts in Europe. Hence, the most accurate answer would be they were seeking religious freedom and financial opportunities.

Answer:

Passed in 1973 over the veto of President Richard Nixon, the War Powers Resolution (its official name) blocks presidents from continuing the pursuance of a war without Congress's approval.  Congress must be notified within 48 hours if troops are deployed, and troops cannot remained deployed beyond 60 days without approval from Congress.

The US Constitution leaves some tension in place between the legislative and executive branch when it comes to the country's involvement in war.  Article I of the Constitution gives Congress the power to declare war.  But Article II names the President the Commander-in-Chief, and presidents frequently have understood that role as containing the authority to deploy US forces without first getting congressional approval.  The War Powers Act requires the President to notify Congress of troop deployments and limits the length of time troops can be deployed without Congressional approval.

Chinese communism had the idea that the rural peasants formed the most important part of the revolution. On the other side, the European communism, for example in the USSR, had the belief that the backbone of the revolution were the urban workers. In the early years of Chinese communism put less emphasis on industry than European communism. With the passing of time the ideas of the Chinese communism evolved and changed.

Answer:

They realized Germany's practice of persecuting the Jews was going against God's teachings.

They were open to His leading and were willing to do the Lord's work.

Explanation:

the answer is B. imposed an embargo on shipping war goods and petroleum products to Japan.

The answer is D and A thank me later

The wind with the rain blew a great deel of my corn down which caused it with so mutch rain to damage very mutch. I am now trying to gether it as fast as I can & I should have been dun but hands cant be hired here at no price at all hardly & I swoped work with one of my neighbours, helped him cut Broom Corn for him to help me gether Corn, every body seams to be behind with their work owing to their having been so mutch wet wether here this Summer & fall & So mutch sickness a part of the latter part of Aug & the first of Sep that they was not anoughf of well persons hardly in the neighborhood to wait on the Sick.1

This passage from Decatur County farmer William Tyner's December, 1855, letter to his sister and brother-in-law is an appropriate prologue for an essay on the history of rural life in Indiana. With eloquent simplicity these lines disclose some pivotal characteristics of Tyner's life as an Indiana farmer: the impact of environmental factors and consequent uncertainties of the harvest, labor shortages that necessitated carefully calculated work sharing, and extended ordeals of sickness.2 The experiences recounted in Tyner's letters illuminate rural life in nineteenth-century Decatur County, Indiana, but must be placed within a broader context of Indiana and midwestern rural history from the early nineteenth to the late twentieth century.

Extensive scholarship exists on midwestern land disposition policies, settlement and land ownership patterns, crop production, technology of farming, commercialization of agriculture, and government agricultural programs.3 In addition, in the past twenty years practitioners of the "new" rural history have enhanced the study of rural life by expanding their focus beyond these topics. Influenced by social history models, which examine everyday lives of ordinary people in connection with large-scale socioeconomic developments, and using social science methodology, including quantitative analysis, the new rural historians have developed ambitious agendas that call for investigating the "lifestyle and activities of farmers and villagers, their family patterns, farming

Answer:

They dug canals to connect different waterways

Explanation:

Answer:

wages, hours, and working conditions

Explanation:

The industrialization in the world quickly led to the formation of a working class consisting of factory workers who had to labor for more than 8 hours, and no labor rights were present. In many cases, they were overloaded with more than 12 hrs working hours, and children were also being employed.

Conditions of low security and safety standards resulted in health problems as a result of intensive work. The wages only helped them survive.

The issues that occurred were recurrent and led to the formation of the first so-called syndicates that frequently turned into strikes for setting demands of social revindication.

The United States supported a revolution in Panama at the start of the 20th century to facilitate the construction of the Panama Canal for military and trade advantages. In return, the US provided financial support to the new country, Panama.

The United States supported a revolution in Panama at the turn of the 20th century primarily to establish a canal across Central America. This strategic move was influenced by several reasons. First, there were the military advantages associated with the empire, primarily built around the guidance provided by Mahan's 'The Influence of Seapower upon History'. Second, there were international trade considerations that would benefit from a direct water route from Atlantic to Pacific. Initially, the US negotiated with Colombia, which controlled Panama at the time. However, the Colombian Senate rejected the treaty which led the US to support a Panamanian uprising against Colombia.

Indeed, President Theodore Roosevelt sent American warships to the coast of Colombia, under the pretense of practice maneuvers during the progression of the Panamanian revolution. These warships obstructed Colombia from sending additional troops in the region, thereby playing a crucial part in the successful Panama revolution. Following the successful revolution, Panama became an American protectorate, and in return for their help, the United States offered them $10 million and additional $250,000 annual rental fee for the land across Panama to construct the canal. The US accomplished the strategic goals of increasing military power and international trade, as the new Panama Canal provided a quicker route for shipping.

https://brainly.com/question/4954044

#SPJ3

The correct answer is No Child Left Behind.

This educational progam laid out by President George W. Bush was meant to help American public schools improve their performance. One of the biggest focuses of this program was to have students test as proficient on standardized tests in the areas of English and Math. Schools that failed to meet this goal would be penalized and those who meet this goal would be rewarded.

The major initiative relating to education by President Bush in 2002 was called No Child Left Behind.

It was a policy by George Bush to ensure that kids around the country would become equally proficient in subjects like English and Math.

This was done by the Presidency to ensure that the dwindling quality of education in the nation would be improved.

In conclusion, option A is correct.

Find out more on No Child Left Behind at https://brainly.com/question/1116975.

SOS:

The geographic location of Ethiopia, Eritrea, Djibouti, and Somalia, puts them close to the Middle East—an important source of oil. They are also near the shipping lanes of the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden. Additionally, countries on the Horn of Africa are strategically located between South Asia and Europe.

Hope this helps!

The best answer here is tenant farmers. They differed from sharecroppers in that tenant farmers actually owned some private property, though that was limited to farming implements. Sharecroppers, on the other hand, only had their labor to give. Neither, however, had ultimate rights to the land on which they worked, since it was owned by wealthy, often elite Southerners.

I think the answer is A. I am not 100% positive though.

Final answer:

The violence of abolitionist protests was NOT a significant motivation for the Emancipation Proclamation, which was driven by military necessity and the need to prevent European support for the Confederacy.

Explanation:

The factor that was NOT a significant motivation for the Emancipation Proclamation was D. violence of abolitionist protests. The primary motivations included military advantage, as freeing slaves would cripple the South's ability to fight and open up recruitment for African American soldiers. Diplomacy played a role, as gaining the goodwill of European nations, especially the anti-slavery British public, would make the Union's cause stronger and undercut Confederate hopes for international recognition. However, the violence of abolitionist protests was not a significant part of the decision, as seen in the other factors discussed.