Which excerpt from “Extremely loud and incredibly close reveals a childish tone ?

The Industrial Revolution sparked technological advances that changed where and how people lived and worked, emphasizing the role of the steam engine, urbanization, and innovations in transportation. The middle class, able to travel for leisure due to railways, witnessed a shift from rural to urban living with significant social and cultural impacts.

During the Industrial Revolution, advancements in technology drastically altered where and how people lived and worked. The steam engine, invented by James Watt and Matthew Boulton, replaced much of the manual labor previously done by humans and animals, revolutionizing industries such as textiles and leading to the rise of factories. This drove people from rural areas to urban centers in search of employment, spurring significant urbanization.

Furthermore, transportation technologies, most notably the railway, contracted physical distances, enabling people to travel quickly over long distances, fostering interconnected regions. This facilitated the development of national markets and helped to end localism. The middle class began to travel for leisure, taking vacations made possible by accessible train travel.

Advances in communication, such as the telegraph and radio, and transportation, such as railroads and automobiles, created a global impact. This led to profound changes in societal structures and cultural norms, as traditional small-scale businesses gave way to the formation of large corporations. The demand for raw materials to feed these new machines and industries also had consequences, contributing to the drive for Imperialism.

The transformation from agrarian to industrial society meant that smaller family sizes became more common, and women increasingly entered the workforce. Urban areas, despite being centers of opportunity, often had poor living conditions, leading to health issues and social unrest among the working poor. Despite these challenges, there was a clear understanding that the world was undergoing a fundamental change that would shape modern society.

Final answer:

The Renaissance began in Italy due to its wealth accumulated from trade, the influence of ancient Greek and Roman culture, and the support of powerful families like the Medici. The sociopolitical shift to city-states and the humanistic philosophy also propelled this cultural rebirth, with its innovations spreading throughout Europe.

Explanation:

The beginning of the Renaissance can largely be attributed to the favorable conditions present in Italy during the late 13th and early 14th centuries. Firstly, the location of Italy as a central hub of Mediterranean trade led to the accumulation of wealth in its city-states such as Florence, Milan, Venice, and the Papal States. This wealth facilitated the patronage of arts and scholarship. The city of Florence, in particular, became a focal point for this new cultural movement due to the political and social structure that allowed for a flourishing middle class of merchants and bankers.

Moreover, Italy had strong ties to the heritage of ancient Greece and Rome, leading to a revival of classical antiquity's artistic and philosophical achievements. This was further sparked by an influx of Greek scholars who migrated to Italy after the Fall of Constantinople. The powerful Medici family in Florence and their extensive patronage played a pivotal role in cultivating and sustaining the cultural rebirth that the Renaissance represented.

Another contributing factor was the shift from medieval feudalism to city-state governments, along with the desire among the newly powerful and wealthy to celebrate life and human potential, a cornerstone of the humanistic philosophy that emerged during the Renaissance.The influence of the Italian Renaissance was profound and lasting, shaping European art and cultural norms for centuries. Innovations in painting, sculpture, and architecture spread from Italy to other parts of Europe, exemplified by the rise of the Fontainebleau School in France and the broad adoption of Italian techniques and motifs.

Answer:

Abolitionists

Those who believed slavery was bad for white workers

Small farmers

Supporters of the Free-Soil Party included abolitionists, those who believed slavery was detrimental to white workers, and small farmers, all of whom opposed the expansion of slavery into the West.

The supporters of the Free-Soil Party were those who believed that the westward expansion of slavery would negatively impact white workers, as it would force them to compete with slave labor. Specifically, this group included abolitionists, individuals concerned about the effects of slavery on white workers, and small farmers who were interested in preserving the territories in the West for free labor. The Free Soil movement was in direct opposition to slaveholders and those who favored the expansion of slavery into new territories, as it aimed to prevent the spread of slavery and protect the interests of free men seeking opportunities in the westward expansion.

This is an honest advertisement for encouraging people to move to California or Oregon in 1862, highlighting the opportunities and challenges while respecting the native communities and the reality of the journey and settlement.

Witness the American Dream in the West!:

Seekers of opportunity, hear this call! Journey to the land where prosperity blooms and freedoms reign. California and Oregon await you in 1862 with arms wide open, promising verdant farmland and the chance for a new life. Manifest Destiny beckons, not just as an ideal, but as a tangible truth for the hardworking soul.

Why go west, you ask? For the vast expanses of land ripe for agriculture, for the burgeoning cities where commerce thrives, and to be part of a dynamic community that values hard work and innovation. The fruits of your labor will not just feed your family but build a nation!

California and Oregon, our destinations, are lands of promise. Your journey may begin on foot, horseback, or by wagon along famous trails such as the Oregon and California Trails. The Pacific Railroad, though still under construction, also symbolizes the connectivity and progress awaiting you.

Be not naive to the perils of this odyssey. Arm yourself with supplies, prudent planning, and unwavering spirit. Expect to encounter diverse peoples, from pioneers like yourself to Native American communities that call this land home. Respect and understanding will be your companions alongside vigilance against possible dangers—harsh climates, rough terrains, and the test of one's own endurance.

In the West, life will blossom like the wildflowers of the plains. The challenges are matched only by the rewards: a homestead, a community, a part of history. Should you hear the call, gather your courage, and lay claim to your piece of the American dream. Your legacy starts with a single step westward.

The quotation from Theodore Roosevelt suggests that the U.S. would increase its involvement in Latin America to prevent European interference, in line with the Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine, which justified U.S. intervention as an international police power.

The quotation from Theodore Roosevelt suggests that future U.S. policy toward Latin America would be one of increased involvement by the United States in order to prevent European interference. This involvement is underpinned by the Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine, which articulated America's right to intervene as an international police power in Latin American nations. Roosevelt's policy aimed to establish U.S. dominance in the Western Hemisphere and ensure that no European powers could exert their influence in the region, justifying intervention for reasons such as debt collection, political instability, or economic turmoil in Latin American countries.

Thus, the correct answer to the student's question would be D. The United States would become more involved in Latin America and keep European countries out. This period of American foreign policy extended the Monroe Doctrine and signified a departure from a policy of noninterference towards a more aggressive stance that often resulted in U.S. military interventions and economic influence over Latin American affairs.

Answer:

Similarities: Both Buddhism and Hinduism share a strong belief in reincarnation; an endless cycle of births and deaths that must be broken. Attachment to people, places, things, or even ideas can lead to suffering; therefore, it’s best to practice non-attachment in the sense that you’re more anchored in your center than in outer circumstances. Meditation is highly regarded in both religions, because they believe real truth and spirituality is inward, not outward. Both believe that everything on the planet will eventually achieve enlightenment and liberation.

Differences: Buddhism has no “rituals” in the traditional sense. They don’t do elaborate prostrations or pujas (prayer rituals). There are not even  priests, really; though they do have senior monastics. Hinduism has an entrenched caste system (though it can be argued it was never meant to be that way), where as Buddhism does not. Buddhists believe that anyone can achieve enlightenment, where Hindus believe you must be of the Brahmin caste. In many sects of Hinduism, it’s believed extreme asceticism is the ideal spiritual life. In Buddhism, the middle path is best.

Final answer:

Maryland was the most important border state during the Civil War due to its strategic location and valuable resources. Both the Union and the Confederacy sought to secure its loyalty.

Explanation:

The most important border state during the Civil War was Maryland. Maryland, along with Missouri, Kentucky, and Delaware, chose not to secede from the Union and remained in an uncertain position. These border states were strategically important due to their natural and industrial resources, which could have greatly benefited either the Union or the Confederacy. According to James McPherson, Maryland, Kentucky, and Missouri would have significantly increased the Confederacy's military manpower, manufacturing capacity, and supply of horses and mules if they had seceded. Therefore, both the Lincoln and Davis administrations sought to attract the loyalty of these border states.

Answer: D religious freedom

Explanation:

Total War was a strategy used during both world wars resulted in the mobilization of countries' entire populations to support war efforts.

This can be referred to as the war strategy where the people that are involved in the conflict are willing to do whatever it takes to win the war.

This means making all forms of sacrifices to ensure that the sides that are fighting wins.

Read more on war here:

https://brainly.com/question/197175

#SPJ6

Answer: After Latin American nations won independence, US president James Monroe issued a warning to European countries. He told European countries that they May not attempt to take back the colonies that they had once owned.

The Amazon River flows through the southern part of Colombia and is joined by significant tributaries in the region. It is a vital component of the South American continent, carrying a substantial amount of the world's river water and supporting extensive biodiversity.

The Amazon River is renowned for its vast expanse, flowing through multiple countries in South America, including Colombia. In Colombia, the Amazon River is accompanied by its significant tributaries such as the Rio Negro and Rio Vaupes, which help drain the interior region of the continent. These tributaries are crucial as they contribute to the Amazon's massive water flow, making it the river system that carries about a fifth of all river water in the world.

While the main source of the Amazon River is located in Peru, the river itself flows through the southern part of Colombia, mainly through its rainforests, providing valuable natural resources and biodiversity. It is a critical waterway for transportation and sustenance, giving life to the world's most extensive and biodiverse tropical rainforest, the Amazon rainforest. The Amazon River's sheer volume is so great that during the rainy season, it can become more than one hundred miles wide, and to this day, no bridges span across it.

Final answer:

Karl Marx and Charles Darwin had revolutionary ideas about competition. Darwin's theory of natural selection challenged fixed species and a young Earth, while Marx's ideas challenged the capitalist system and introduced the concept of class struggle.

Explanation:

Marx and Darwin:

Karl Marx and Charles Darwin had different areas of focus, but both had revolutionary ideas about competition. Darwin's theory of natural selection and evolution challenged the prevailing belief in fixed species and a young Earth, revolutionizing biology. Marx's ideas about class struggle and the inevitable overthrow of capitalism by the proletariat revolutionized social and political thought.

Darwin's ideas about competition were revolutionary because they challenged the traditional belief in the fixed nature of species and the idea that all organisms were specially created. Darwin argued that competition between individuals for limited resources, along with natural selection, led to the adaptation and evolution of species over time.

Marx's ideas about competition were revolutionary because he introduced the concept of class struggle and the role it played in historical change. Marx believed that capitalism created an inherent conflict between the bourgeoisie, who owned the means of production, and the proletariat, the working class. He argued that this conflict would eventually lead to a proletarian revolution and the establishment of a classless society.

Answer:

The correct answers are A: It brings people of different ethnic backgrounds together under a common faith.

B: It demonstrates sacrifice and dedication to one’s faith.

C: It brings people of diverse economic backgrounds together under a common faith.

im lateeee