Which items did the people of Great Zimbabwe take to the markets of the Swahili Coast? Check all that apply.

The correct answer is C) Rabbis became leaders of Jewish rituals.

The Israelites consider Canaan to be the Promised Land because they believed that Rabbis became leaders of Jewish rituals.

The promised land was the belief in Hebrew culture that God had promised a new land for them when Moses liberated the Israelite people from the oppression of the Egyptian Pharaoh and started to wander the desert for 40 years. This is a passage of the Book of "Exodus" that appears in the Old Testament of the Bible.

The Knights of Labor's development, had members publicly admitted to union affiliation, could have led to dismissals but also potentially increased support and popularity, depending on external attitudes.

The development of the Knights of Labor could have taken several possible directions had its members admitted belonging to the union. This scenario involves a complicated interaction of labor relations, employer attitudes, and societal views at the time.

It's plausible that development might have suffered (Option A), as employers often viewed union members unfavorably, and union affiliation could have led to dismissals. It's also possible that open union affiliation could have brought greater legitimacy and thus more support (Options B and C). However, this would heavily depend on the attitudes of business leaders and the government.

Finally, more visibility might have contributed to union popularity (Option D), encouraging more workers to join.

However, it's important to note that the historical context and specific circumstances surrounding each instance would heavily influence the outcome.

https://brainly.com/question/13486034

#SPJ2

Answer:

It is C , They planted cotton and practiced slavery.

Explanation:

Thats the answer on edg

In the 1800s, American Indian tribes sought to integrate into white American civilization is They grew cotton and used slaves. Thus, option (C) is correct.

Conservative and liberal aspects coexist in American society, as do scientific and religious competition, political frameworks, risk-taking and free speech, and materialist and moral elements.

In the 1800s, American Indian tribes attempted to assimilate into white American society by growing cotton and employing slaves.

Because its inhabitants come from so many diverse origins and cultures, and there are so many varied views, values, and customs, the United States might be referred to as a melting pot. Therefore, it can be concluded that option (C) is correct.

Learn more about American culture here:

https://brainly.com/question/17396096

#SPJ2

The drought was the very worst, ah ah

When the flowers that we'd grown together died of thirst

It was months, and months of back and forth, ah ah

You're still all over me like a wine-stained dress I can't wear anymore

Hung my head, as I lost the war, and the sky turned black like a perfect storm

Rain came pouring down when I was drowning

That's when I could finally breathe

And by morning, gone was any trace of you, I think I am finally clean

There was nothing left to do, ah ah

When the butterflies turned to dust, they covered my whole room

So I punched a hole in the roof, ah ah

Let the flood carry away all my pictures of you

The water filled my lungs, I screamed so loud but no one heard a thing

Answer:

The answer is No major genocides occurred during the 1950's and 1960's.  

Explanation:

Preceding the pilgrim period, Tutsi for the most part involved the higher strata in the social framework and the Hutu the lower. In any case, social versatility was conceivable, a Hutu who gained a substantial number of cows or other riches could be absorbed into the Tutsi gathering and ruined Tutsi would be viewed as Hutu. A family framework likewise worked, with the Tutsi faction known as the Manning being the most ground-breaking. All through the 1800's, extended their impact by triumph and by offering insurance as an end-result of tribute.

Answer by YourHope:

Hoi! :)

What generalization can be made based on the information presented in the timeline?

No major genocides occurred during the 1950's and 1960's!

Hope this helps~

It was called the Bay of Pigs Invasion.

Answer: Bay of pigs incident

Explanation:The Bay of Pigs involved US-trained Cuban revolutionaries in an attempt to overthrow the communist government of Cuba. The attempt was unsuccessful.

In the 11th century caliphs brought Islam in India. HOPE I HELPED! :)

1) the Lincoln County War waged to capture Billy the Kid

2) the prolonged gunfight of Elfego Baca where he held off 80 Texas cowboys for 33 hours

3) the gangs that terrorized San Miguel County including the gang Las Gorras Blancas or white hoods. 

Answer:

It was important for architecture to become a specialized, professional career in the late 1800´s for various reasons. A few of those was that during the 1800´s, there was new heights reached in construction technology. For one, plumbing, elevators, steel beams, central heating and electric systems were better, as well as ventilation systems, which added to the new constructions. The first institution dedicated to organizing the architectural field was the American Institute of Architects (AIA), founded in 1857; it started there and then, the definition of laws and standards for the profession. For economical, as well as functional and legal reasons, buildings had to be stronger and more sophisticated which led to a need for professionally trained architects capable of solving problems based on real facts and not just guessing. Being in a time where abundance of technology for building higher skyscrapers was high, the logical reason was to take advantage of it. Hence, the need for more professional architects during the late 1800´s to build more and higher buildings.

Architecture was an activity that anyone with some kind of experience on the subject could practice until it became a licensed profession in 1857

The creation of the American Institute of Architects(AIA) in on February 23 of the same year, by Henry Dudley, Richard Morris Hunt, Henry Babcock -among others- "procured the practical perfection of its members". The main purpose was to establish Architecture as a profession,

Among the first schools of Architecture in America in the late 1860's and the beginning of the 1870's, we find the MIT in Boston, Cornell University in New York and the University of Chicago.

The fairness of penalties for unauthorized immigrants is a topic of debate involving the balance between law enforcement and the rights of immigrants, with factors such as legal representation, self-deportation, and national security being central to the discussion.

The question of whether the penalties for unauthorized immigrants are fair is complex and inextricably linked to diverse societal viewpoints and immigration policies. One argument suggests that employers who hire illegal immigrants should face penalties, as this is in line with laws prohibiting the practice of knowingly hiring unauthorized immigrants. The rationale behind such laws is to deter employers from hiring illegal immigrants by making the risk of penalties a counterbalance to the benefits of accessing potentially cheaper labor. On the other hand, there is a debate around providing a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants who meet certain stringent requirements, indicating a more lenient and integrative approach. This debate encompasses considerations such as the long-term residency of many immigrants and their established familial roots in the U.S.

Another significant concern is the legal representation and the due process rights of detained unauthorized immigrants. The lack of legal representation and competent legal assistance are pointed out as major flaws in the current detention system. Moreover, the concept of self-deportation is challenged by insights from the Immigration Policy Center, which indicate little evidence for its effectiveness, particularly due to the deep roots that many unauthorized immigrants have in the U.S. Lastly, the dilemma surrounding illegal immigration ties into national security concerns, wherein untracked immigrants might pose a security risk to the host country.

Answer:

a desire to live closer to family members

several attractive job opportunities

equal rights in a democratic government

Explanation:

Pull factors are those factors which attract people to an area where migrants are going and these factors could be such as:

these are some pull factors.

Some examples of pull factors include options D, E and F: a desire to live closer to family members, several attractive job opportunities and equal rights in a democratic government.

Pull factors defined as the factors that encourage the people to change their path, thinking towards other people, place or job.

Moreover, it attracts the other people to a particular place. This include equal rights of people in a country and various job opportunities that is helpful for better growth of employee.

Therefore, correct options are D,E and F.

Learn more about pull factors, refer to the link:

https://brainly.com/question/1489917

The British felt justified imposing the Stamp Act on the colonists as they viewed the colonies as dependent territories. The Stamp Act of 1765 was a method to generate revenue and fund British soldiers in North America. However, this led to colonists feeling unjustly taxed without their consent, sparking the first major protest against British imperial policy.

The British felt justified imposing the Stamp Act on the colonists as they viewed the relationship with the colonies as one of dependence, not equality. The Stamp Act of 1765 was seen by the British Parliament as a necessary measure to generate revenue for Britain, especially to repay debts accrued from the Seven Years' War. Although the tax remained in place after the debt was settled, this was the first instance where the colonists were taxed solely for revenue generation.

The passage of the Stamp Act signaled a shift in British policy, making colonists directly contribute to the upkeep of British soldiers in North America. This was a deviation from the tradition of colonists paying taxes to their colonial governments indirectly through higher prices. Hence, this Act led to the first serious protest against British imperial policy.

The enactment of the Stamp Act gave rise to the famous slogan “no taxation without representation." This was because the colonists did not have representations in the House of Commons, where bills of taxation originated, leading to their feeling of being unjustly taxed without consent.

https://brainly.com/question/29740449

#SPJ2

HERE ARE SOME CONS I CAN COME UP WITH

The promise of better wages attracted migrants to cities and industrial towns that were ill-prepared to handle them. Although initial housing shortages in many areas eventually gave way to construction booms and the development of modern buildings, cramped shantytowns made up of shacks and other forms of poor-quality housing appeared first. Local sewerage and sanitation systems were overwhelmed by the sudden influx of people, and drinking water was often contaminated. People living in such close proximity, fatigued by poor working conditions, and drinking unsafe water presented ideal conditions for outbreaks of typhus, cholera, smallpox, tuberculosis, and other infectious diseases. The need to treat these and other diseases in urban areas spurred medical advances and the development of modern building codes, health laws, and urban planning in many industrialized cities.With relatively few exceptions, the world’s modern environmental problems began or were greatly exacerbated by the Industrial Revolution. To fuel the factories and to sustain the output of each and every type of manufactured good, natural resources (water, trees, soil, rocks and minerals, wild and domesticated animals, etc.) were transformed, which reduced the planet’s stock of valuable natural capital. The global challenges of widespread water and air pollution, reductions in biodiversity, destruction of wildlife habitat, and even global warming can be traced back to this moment in human history. The more countries industrialize in pursuit of their own wealth, the greater this ecological transformation becomes. For example, atmospheric carbon dioxide, a primary driver of global warming, existed in concentrations of 275 to 290 parts per million by volume (ppmv) before 1750 and increased to more than 400 ppmv by 2017. In addition, human beings use more than 40% of Earth’s land-based net primary production, a measure of the rate at which plants convert solar energy into food and growth. As the world’s human population continues to grow and more and more people strive for the material benefits promised by the Industrial Revolution, more and more of Earth’s resources are appropriated for human use, leaving a dwindling stock for the plants and animals upon whose ecosystem services (clean air, clean water, etc.) the biosphere depends.

I would say A and B. There were too many immigrants and cities were prepared for all of them. That then resulted in poor working conditions and poor living conditions.

1.  Martin luther

2. John calvin

Martin Luther said faith can lead to salvation and John Calvin who will be saved is predetermined by god.

Luther believed according to Christian doctrine faith alone can save people, he believed both faith and work are necessary for salvation, While according to Calvin god only chooses who is worthy of entering heaven.

Therefore, it can be said that options D and D aptly describe the statement.

Learn more about Martin Luther and John Calvin's beliefs here:

https://brainly.com/question/11374907

Explanation:

There typically should be a legal basis for the appeal—an alleged material errors within the trial—not merely the truth that the losing party did not just like the verdict. In a civil case, both parties can also appeal to a higher court. Some states give the prosecution a limited right to appeal to determine positive points of law.

Hope this helps, please give brainliest!

The answer is "...if a/the higher court agrees to hear it."

Hope this helped....

Japan

China<>p

French Protestants inspired by John Calvin were called Huguenots.

Answer: Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots Huguenots

Hope I didn’t take up too much space XD

a period of 100 years is a millennium so maybe it would end with millenniums

The 26th amendment lowered the voting age to 18. The 19th amendment guaranteed all women the right to vote.

Correct answer:

Context/details:

19th Amendment

The 19th Amendment to the Constitution reads as follows:

The proposal to add such an amendment was first introduced in Congress in 1878, but Congress did not pass the amendment till 1919 -- after the experience of women taking on greater roles in the country during the First World War.  The amendment achieved ratification by a sufficient number of states and was added to the Constitution by August, 1920.

26th Amendment

During the 1960s in America, protests against the Vietnam War were active on college campuses across the country.  Part of those protests were the demands of young people chanting, "Old enough to fight, old enough to vote."  Since 18 was old enough to be drafted to fight in the war, young people argued for their right to vote as full citizens.

The 26th Amendment was passed by Congress on March 23, 1971.  It was ratified by the states faster than any other amendment, achieving ratification by July 1, 1971.

The 26th Amendment is worded as follows:  

The federal government regulates transportation through fiscal federalism and influences state transportation policies, whereas states focus on safety and maintaining local infrastructure.

The federal government plays a substantial role in regulating transportation, particularly through its management of fiscal federalism, which includes the disbursement of federal highway funds to shape state policies on issues like seat belt laws and DUI penalties. In contrast, state and local governments also regulate transportation but focus more on issues of highway safety, such as cellphone usage while driving, and maintaining the infrastructure within their jurisdictions. Although the federal government sets broad transportation policies and provides significant funding, particularly for interstate projects, states retain important regulatory powers, including setting speed limits and safety regulations that affect highways and local roads.

The federal government plays a key role in regulating interstate transportation and national transportation safety standards, while state and local governments primarily manage intrastate transportation and local transit systems.

The federal government, through departments such as the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT), oversees the regulation of transportation that crosses state lines, such as interstate highway systems and aviation. This includes implementing national policies, safety regulations, and funding large-scale infrastructure projects. The federal government also sets emissions standards for vehicles and regulates the transportation of hazardous materials.

State governments, on the other hand, are responsible for maintaining state highways and regulating the drivers and vehicles within their borders, including issuing driver's licenses and vehicle registrations. They also may establish state-specific transportation laws, such as speed limits and safety inspections.

Local governments typically handle public transit systems, local roads, and traffic management within their jurisdictions. They are often responsible for local transportation planning, zoning, and funding for transit projects that cater to the specific needs of their communities.

Together, these levels of government work in a layered and sometimes overlapping system to ensure the safety, efficiency, and accessibility of transportation networks across the nation.

Especially since the early 1950s, America has been concerned with opposing revolutions throughout the world; in the process, it has generated a historiography that denies its own revolutionary past. This neoconservative view of the American Revolution, echoing the reactionary writer in the pay of the Austrian and English governments of the early nineteenth century, Friedrich von Gentz, tries to isolate the American Revolution from all the revolutions in the western world that preceded it and followed it. The American Revolution, this view holds, was unique; it alone of all modern revolutions was not really revolutionary; instead, it was moderate, conservative, dedicated only to preserving existing institutions from British aggrandizement. Furthermore, like all else in America, it was marvelously harmonious and consensual. Unlike the wicked French and other revolutions in Europe, the American Revolution, then, did not upset or change anything. It was therefore not really a revolution at all; certainly, it was not radical.

Industrialization moved the economy away from agriculture.

Answer:

It is A on E2020

Explanation:

there is no reason to believe is true without evidence to support it

Answer:

There is no reason to believe its true without evidence to support it

Explanation:

President Roosevelt decided that Eisenhower not Marshall would be Supreme Allied Commander in Europe.

The Berlin Conference was the destruction of Africa in more than one sense: the colonial powers divided the countries of the African continent; When independence progressively returned to Africa in the second half of the 20th century, the continent had such a degree of political, social and cultural fragmentation that it has not yet been able to rise.

At the time of the conference, 80% of Africa remained under local control. What ultimately resulted was a hodgepodge of geometric boundaries that divided Africa into fifty irregular countries. This new map of the continent was superimposed on the thousand cultures and indigenous regions that existed. The new countries lacked cohesion, divided coherent groups of people and merged disparate groups that did not really get along.

It cause conflict because both church and monarchs claimed claimed the same powers