Which of these was NOT a reason the effort to build a truly effective
Freedmen's Bureau in Texas failed? ​

Answer:

Differentiated

Explanation:

Differentiation means designing instructional materials and methods to meet the individualistic needs of all students. Teachers adjust their curriculum and instruction in such a way that all the students maximize their learning. From the disabled student, to the English student, struggling student and the gifted and talented student.

Evidence had shown that this approach to learning has great effects on student learning.

Answer:

Legislative courts refer to courts created by legislature, other than courts created by constitution. Legislative courts are set up for some specialized purpose. For example, Court of Claims, and the U.S. Tax Court. USCS Const.

Answer:

Many of their privileges went away

Explanation:

Many of their privileges were lost as a result of the French nobility's authority over numerous petty nations.

From the Middle Ages until its extinction on June 23, 1790, during the French Revolution, France's aristocracy was a privileged social class.

Emperor Napoleon gave titles from 1808 to 1815 during the First Empire that were acknowledged as a new nobility by the Charter of June 4, 1814, given by King Louis XVIII of France.

The French nobility was reinstated as a hereditary distinction without privileges from 1814 to 1848 (the Bourbon Restoration in France and the July Monarchy), and from 1852 to 1870 (the Second French Empire). New hereditary titles were also given. The French nobility has been without a legal presence or status ever since the Third Republic in France began on September 4, 1870.

Learn more about French nobility, from:

brainly.com/question/663655

#SPJ3

Answer: hypoactive sexual desire disorder

Explanation: hypoactive sexual desire disorder can be simply defined as a sexual dysfunction or disorder where spouse or individuals have little or no desire for sexual activities. (Low libido).

From the statement of the therapist, " most common complaint of couples" it's quite clear that the couple are having a hard time developing sexual desires or fantasies for one another. This is called hypoactive sexual desire disorder.

Answer:

The correct answer is: Hypoactive sexual desire.

Explanation:

Hypoactive sexual desire can be understood as a sexual dysfunction that occurs when an individual doesn't experiment with sexual fantasies and lacks the desire to engage in sexual activity. To be considered a disorder, the lack of desire and fantasies have to cause significant distress or interpersonal problems to the individual experimenting it. It is the most common complaint of couples who seek sex therapy.

In conclusion, from the therapist's statement, we could conclude that the couple is having problems with sexual desire, specifically, they are having hypoactive sexual desire.

Answer:

Option C, A, B, D  

Explanation:

In simple words, the reporting officer on the crime scene should first ask for first aid to the center if he or she finds someone injured. If there is no such condition then the officer must seal the crime scene to protect the evidence that the reinforcement teams might find earlier.        

After protecting the crime scene from any infiltration, officer should himself or herself search for any instant evidence that might not be visible after time. And if the officer gets any eye witnesses then he or she should start questioning.

Answer:

D

Explanation: It only a warning to European nations and not a declaration of war.

Answer:

The Answer is D

Explanation:

D

Answer:

Learning

Explanation:

The learning approach is very famous in psychology. This approach described how behavior is acquired through learning. Through the learning approach, the theorist examines how a person acquires these approaches and underlie the learning system. The learning approach focused on observation, viewing, investigation, mental process, and unconscious forces.

Bandura has been proposed observational learning through modeling, role play, etc. Thus here professor King has been used learning approaches.

Professor King's emphasis on observable behaviors and external influencers, like rewards and punishments, suggests he is likely using the Learning psychological approach. This approach relies on environmental stimuli and observed behavior, rather than internal cognitive processes or unconscious drives.

Based on the explanation provided, it seems Professor King likely aligns with the Learning psychological approach. This perspective focuses on how environmental factors, such as rewards or punishments, influence behavior. Actions are seen as dictated by learned responses to stimuli, rather than being influenced by internal processes like thoughts or feelings. Thus, this field of research is often characterized by observable and measurable phenomena, aligning with Professor King's methodology of sticking to what can be observed and directly measured. This contrasts with other psychological approaches like the cognitive or the psychodynamic, which emphasize internal mental processes or unconscious drives, respectively.

https://brainly.com/question/31666804

#SPJ12

Answer:

It created centripetal forces at both local and national scales.

Explanation:

college board

The establishment of Nunavut has allowed local Inuit self-governance and preservation of culture, while at the national level, it acknowledges indigenous diversity and has set precedents for indigenous rights within Canada.

The creation of Nunavut has had significant impacts on both the local and national scales within Canada. Locally, the formation of Nunavut allowed the Inuit population to exercise greater self-governance, preserve their culture, and gain control over their land and resources. This has been critical for maintaining their way of life, which is largely based on traditional hunting and fishing practices. At the national level, the establishment of Nunavut has helped Canada recognize the diversity of its indigenous populations and their unique statuses. It has also set a precedent for how the Canadian government acknowledges and addresses indigenous rights and self-determination within its constitutional framework. By successfully creating a new territory focused on indigenous governance, Nunavut serves as an exemplar promoting unity through diversity, potentially reducing threats of further devolutionary forces across the country.

Final answer:

Jamal is using symbolic interactionism to study the presentation of the self within an outlaw motorcycle club, employing the method of participant observation for his qualitative research.

Explanation:

Jamal is working with the theory of symbolic interactionism, which is concerned with the day-to-day interaction of groups and individuals and the use of symbols in the communication process. Relevant to Jamal's study is the concept of impression management, defined as the way individuals choose to present themselves in different social settings, often divided into 'frontstage' and 'backstage' presentations. The method he's adopting for his qualitative study, similar to Rothman's participant observation, will enable him to immerse himself in the motorcycle club's culture and observe the social interactions and presentations of the self both within and outside of the club's environment.

Answer:

b. An ordinary, prudent, and reasonable person under similar circumstances.

Explanation:

Negligence is a legal theory , which holds the defendant responsible for harm caused to the plaintiff.

These contracts include : a legal 'duty' of care 'breached' by defendant, where defendant's action are 'causation' to plaintiff 'damage'

Eg : Car Accidents, 'slip & fall' injury cases are usual examples of  these.

So, the defendant has duty to act like 'A specialist trained in the area of the accident' - to make his careful duty prevent plaintiff from damage.

The differences in chamber sizes and constituencies affect the formality of debate in the House and the Senate.

The differences in chamber sizes and constituencies have a significant influence on the formality of debate in the House and the Senate. In the House of Representatives, where the chamber size is larger and each representative represents a smaller constituency, the debate tends to be more formal. This is because representatives have to compete for speaking time and abide by stricter rules to ensure order. On the other hand, the Senate, with a smaller chamber size and representatives serving larger constituencies, allows for more informal and less structured debates.

https://brainly.com/question/16185700

The House's large size and short terms create a formal, hierarchical structure, while the Senate's smaller size and longer terms facilitate a less formal environment and a more deliberate approach to legislating.

The differences in chamber sizes and constituencies between the House of Representatives and the Senate significantly influence the formality of debate in each. The House, with its larger membership and smaller constituencies, has a more formal structure, emphasizing hierarchy and seniority due to its need to frequently answer to the demands of constituents because of the two-year term of office. This leads to a more formal and structured leadership and sometimes a highly partisan atmosphere. In contrast, the Senate's smaller size and longer six-year terms create a less formal environment. With statewide constituencies and a broader appeal needed for reelection, Senators can afford to consider a wider array of opinions and play a longer game, leading to a more deliberate approach where individual members can exert significant control over the legislative process.

Answer:

The quantum wavelength of a rifle bullet in flight is not observable since it is much larger than the radius of Earth.

Explanation:

This statement is the false statement among the options as the quantum wavelength of a rifle bullet in flight, the uncertainty of the bullet in the bullet position is too small and hence is considered insignificant because of the difficulty in measuring the position, even though it is actually possible to do so.

Answer:

Explanation:

Computer Companies in the 20th century have changed the world by drastically increasing the standard of living all over the world. This was mainly done by developing software systems to automate menial repetitive tasks at a much faster pace. This therefore frees up lots of time and saves individuals large quantities of money.

Answer:

(many task) something but it start with that

Explanation:

The correct statement is that using humor can maintain positive emotions in team discussions and keep relationship conflicts at bay. This contrasts against the other statements, which misrepresent what relationship and constructive conflicts are or assume incorrect outcomes of relationship conflicts.

You asked which of the mentioned statements about relationship conflict and team norms is true. The accurate statement is B: 'It is ideal to use humor to maintain positive group emotions in teams when issues are debated to keep relationship conflict at bay.' This approach often helps diffuse tension and foster a more collaborative, respectful environment where team members can share their perspectives without fear of exacerbating conflict.

Options A, C, and D are incorrect. Team norms that address and diffuse relationship conflict early tend to be effective. Relationship conflict and constructive conflict are not the same thing - relationship conflicts are personal and emotional, while constructive conflicts are task-oriented and can promote growth. Lastly, relationship conflicts often hinder rational, logical debates rather than facilitate them.

https://brainly.com/question/31596379

#SPJ6

Among the options provided, the true statement is that it is often beneficial to use humor in maintaining positive emotions and preventing relationship conflict within teams. This approach helps foster more effective collaboration.

In this case, the true statement among the options given is B. It is ideal to use humor to maintain positive group emotions in teams when issues are debated to keep relationship conflict at bay. Understanding the dynamics of a team is crucial. This includes knowing when to inject humor or lightheartedness to diffuse tension and maintain positive relationships, which ultimately helps foster a more effective team. Also, statements A and D misrepresent relationship conflict - it is typically destructive and hinders effective, logical debates. On the other hand, constructive conflict (C) represents divergent ideas discussed in a positive, respectful manner - the polar opposite of personal, relationship-based conflict.

https://brainly.com/question/14529080

#SPJ6

Final answer:

Option C. Mohandas Gandhi, known as Mahatma Gandhi, is recognized as the foremost non-violent activist in India, who utilized Civil Disobedience to lead India to independence.

Explanation:

The individual best known for being a non-violent activist in the country of India is Mohandas Gandhi, also known as Mahatma Gandhi. He is famous for his strategy of nonviolent protest and resistance, or Civil Disobedience, a concept he utilized effectively in India's struggle for independence from British rule.

Gandhi's philosophy was that violence led to more complications and by adhering to nonviolent means, the oppressor's unjust actions would be exposed.

His methods garnered international attention and inspired other civil rights movements and leaders, such as Martin Luther King Jr. In 1947, after years of peaceful protests, actions like the Salt March, and other forms of civil disobedience, India finally won independence.

Therefore, option C) is correct.

Andrew Young organized citizenship schools to educate African-Americans about voting rights in the 1960s.

Andrew Young, in the 1960s, helped to organize citizenship schools as part of the Civil Rights movement. These schools aimed to educate African-American people, particularly in the South, about their voting rights and provided literacy skills needed to pass voter registration exams.

Answer:

Image result for What role did an ephor play in Spartan government?

The ephors were a council of five elected annually who swore "on behalf of the city" while the kings swore for themselves. ... Up to two ephors would accompany a king on extended military campaigns as a sign of control, and they held the authority to declare war during some periods in Spartan history.

Explanation:

Final answer:

In Spartan government, ephors were annually elected officials who held significant executive power, the authority to arrest and try kings, and they accompanied the king during wartime to act as a check on his authority.

Explanation:

The role of an ephor in Spartan government was to exercise the chief executive power within the state, serving as one of the key political figures in its unique system of governance. Ephors were elected annually by the people and held significant authority, including the power to arrest and try kings. This significant level of power meant that the ephors played a central role in maintaining legal and political order in Sparta. Moreover, they could hold kings accountable and were responsible for overseeing various aspects of Sparta's domestic and military matters.

Ephors were also involved in foreign policy; for example, during wartime, two of the five ephors would accompany the king to ensure a system of checks and balances on his authority. This system underlined the complex nature of Spartan governance, where power was distributed among various branches, including the ephors, the dual kings, the gerousia (Council of Elders), and the ecclesia (the Assembly of Spartiates).

Answer: True

Explanation:

Answer:

In a nursing home

Explanation:

Emilio is facing imminent death. consistent with a recent study of canadians in a similar situation, given a choice, the least desirable place he would choose to die is In a nursing home

Answer:

Your requested behavior required little effort.

Explanation:

A persuasive speech can be defined as a speech in which the orator tries to convince his/her audience to agree with his point of view. There are many persuasive strategies that an orator adopts such as ethos, pathos, logos, bandwagon, etc.

In the given speech, the strategy of performing an action is used. This strategy of persuading was developed by Alan Monroe in the mid-1930s. According to this strategy, an orator can ask to perform a quick action that requires little effort and can be performed immediately. The action was simple and required little effort and was immediate action, thus, 90% of the audience was persuaded to support the PETA organization.

So, the correct answer is that the speech required a little effort of action.

The success of the speech to persuade students to support PETA was due to the effective use of pathos, structured argumentation, and engaging the audience with credible evidence and a call to action.

You were successful most likely because you effectively utilized pathos, or emotional appeal, in your persuasive speech to encourage students to support PETA. Pathos plays a vital role in persuasion as it connects with the audience on an emotional level. Drawing on feelings such as sympathy for animals, indignation towards their mistreatment, and guilt for not acting sooner, you managed to compel a high percentage of students to demonstrate support by putting a PETA sticker on their folders. Moreover, your skillful presentation would have included a structured argument, credible evidence, and engagement techniques to not only inform but also inspire action from your audience.

Starting with an engaging introduction, you would have captured your audience's attention through methods such as sharing an anecdote, providing surprising facts about animal treatment, or using persuasive imagery. Progressing through the body of the speech, you would logically order your argument to showcase the detrimental effects on animals and the environment, using trusted sources to establish credibility. Lastly, inspiring calls to action, similar to the example of Peterson’s solidarity appeal, would have been included to provide a clear and motivational closing that stirs the desire to make a difference.

Your speech would align with the principles of rhetoric, recalling eloquent suffragists like Elsie Hill, who also harnessed the power of emotion to persuade audiences. Using rhetorical strategies and speaking from an outline rather than a written script ensures that your speech appears natural and is readily absorbed by the listeners.

Answer:

authoritarian; authoritative                  

Explanation:

In psychology, there are mainly four distinct types of parenting style including authoritarian, uninvolved, permissive, and authoritative.

Authoritarian parenting style: A parenting style in which parents are distinguished as having low responsiveness and high demands. Generally, they pose very high expectations from their child whereas providing a little nurturance and feedback. Mistakes by a child are being harshly punished.

Authoritative parenting style: A parenting style in which parents are high on demands as well as high on responsiveness. Generally, they respond to their child's emotional needs along with keeping high standards. Enforce boundaries and set limits as well.

Explanation:

Answer:

denial

Explanation:

hopes this helps

Answer:

Decrease

Explanation:

Given the high level of uncertainty present at the onset of the entry phase, as the amount of verbal communication between strangers increases, the level of uncertainty for each interactant in the relationship will decrease

Answer:

decrease

Explanation:

The uncertainty decreases, and chances of communicating better become a possibility:

When two strangers meet, the process of communicating makes feelings of uncertainty to decrease and distance to breach the gap, and this increases the chances for a better communication process to develop. Some other interactions may take place since the verbal communication helps build empathy and triggers interactions among people that would by other means be hindered.

Mandy's change in attitude towards Californians can be explained by cognitive dissonance, a psychological concept that describes the discomfort felt when one's beliefs conflict with their experiences. Mandy resolves this discomfort by changing her initial belief about Californians being 'weird'.

Mandy's attitude shift towards people from California can be best explained by the concept of cognitive dissonance in psychology. Cognitive dissonance refers to a situation where a person's beliefs are contradictory to his or her actual experiences. In this case, Mandy believed that all Californians were 'weird', but her experiences with her Californian roommate challenged this belief, creating an inconsistency. To resolve this inconsistency or dissonance, Mandy changed her belief and decided that Californians aren't all that bad. This is a typical cognitive response to conflicting information or experiences.

https://brainly.com/question/34352591

#SPJ3

Mandy's change in attitude toward Californians is a result of cognitive dissonance, where she modifies her beliefs due to her positive experience with her new roommate from California.

Mandy's attitude shift best accounts for the psychological concept known as cognitive dissonance. This occurs when someone has conflicting beliefs, values, or attitudes, and they change their thoughts or behaviors to reduce the discomfort caused by the inconsistency. In Mandy's case, her belief that all Californians were "weird" was challenged by her positive experience with her roommate, leading her to reassess her stereotype and adopt a more favorable view of Californians.

Answer:

David Hume, the great empiricist, argued that all knowledge, including mathematics and natural philosophy (what we now call natural science), depend to some extent on the science of the human being, since they have a more or less direct relationship , with human nature.

Explanation:

According to what Hume stated, I consider that there are great and amazing things that do not depend on nature because we would be seeing the human being as the axis and center of all; and today thanks to the advances in science, human nature has served to discover but not to co-create biological and intelligent things but only mechanical systems that have been useful to humans.

The laws of nature are not based on psychological conditioning, but on static principles, physical laws that scarcely the human being can discover but still cannot understand why these laws exist or why they are there in our nature or on our planet, putting " healthy limits "and making life possible.

As for what Hume says that God does not exist because his existence cannot be demonstrated, he contradicts his cause-effect theory, because if there is an effect there is a power that originated it. So if there is a house had a designer, or for example if a scientist manages to discover a vaccine, that product or vaccine was invented by someone very intelligent, likewise happens with the laws of nature "perfect in itself" a powerful and intelligent gave rise to everything that exists and to the logical order that we see in nature.

Final answer:

David Hume's critique questions the foundations of scientific understanding and the existence of God based on necessary connections and causality, emphasizing psychological conditioning over rational justification. His significant influence on modern thought and methodology highlights the importance of empirical evidence and critical examination in both philosophy and science.

Explanation:

David Hume's critique of the concept of 'necessary connections' and his challenge to the traditional arguments for the existence of God offer profound insights into philosophy and the nature of scientific inquiry. Hume's argument about causality, often referred to as Hume's problem of induction, posits that our beliefs in causality and the laws of nature are founded not on rational justification but on habit and experience of constant conjunction. This perspective shakes the foundation of what we consider scientific knowledge and the methodology of science itself, suggesting that our understanding of cause and effect is less about seeing actual connections and more about psychological conditioning.

Hume also critically assessed the teleological argument for the existence of God, presenting one of the most significant challenges to it prior to Charles Darwin's theory of evolution. His work leads to a reevaluation of the evidence required to support miracles and supernatural claims, establishing a high standard of evidence for such assertions. Hume's influence extends across philosophy, science, and even cognitive science, showcasing his significant role in shaping modern thought.

Despite Hume's skepticism, he acknowledged that his observations did not necessarily negate the operations of the natural world but called for a deeper understanding of our own perceptions and beliefs. In the current era of scientific and technological advances, Hume's scrutiny of causality and his emphasis on empirical evidence continue to be relevant, reminding us of the importance of questioning and critically examining the foundations of our knowledge and beliefs. Hume's work highlights the necessity of a continual reevaluation of our methodologies and assumptions, even in the face of advancing scientific frontiers.

Answer:

Peripheral route persuasion.

Explanation:

The persuasive routes concept was developed by Petty and Cacioppo in 1981. They defined two routes of persuasion. They are, central and peripheral.

The peripheral route to persuasion is a form of persuasive message that is based solely on appearance. This persuasive route is not based on argument or the content of the message but peripheral cues.

In the given case, the persuasion form that can be used to convince Alexandra to buy a car would not be based on why a car is good, or the speed, etc. The contents that are usually looked by a car buyer, but on peripheral cues.  

Persuading someone based on peripheral cues involves less effort as it is only slightly related to the content. A seller can persuade Alexandra by showing good-looking cars with nice stereo system.

So, the correct answer is Peripheral Route to Persuasion.

The emergence of electricity positively changed the lives of those women at that time, providing good times. A better approach with your children, the house and your husband. The invention of electricity was very positive because it gradually gave women freedom with the whole set of things that came from electricity too.

Answer:

Cognitive Therapy.

Explanation:

Cognitive Therapy was first developed by Aaron Beck in the 1960s. It is psychotherapy through which negative and destructive thoughts are identified and changed. With the help of cognitive therapy, a trainer help people who have a problem of having spontaneous negative thoughts which can lead to depression, anxiety, fear, etc by defeating self-destructing thoughts with realistic and objective thoughts. Cognitive therapy is applied first by identifying negative thoughts then replacing them with practical new skills.

So, the correct answer is cognitive therapy.

Actively disputing self-defeating ideas is part of cognitive-behavioral therapy, where individuals challenge negative beliefs to achieve positive outcomes and improve decision-making and self-efficacy through cognitive restructuring and self-affirmation.

Training people to actively dispute their self-defeating ideas aligns with cognitive-behavioral therapy principles, particularly the ABCD model of psychological distress and change. Active disputation (D) is the process by which individuals challenge their self-defeating beliefs (B), originated from an adverse event (A), to prevent unhelpful consequences (C). Rather than accepting negative thoughts, individuals learn to reframe their perspectives, leading to more positive outcomes.For instance, changing one's thinking about personal skills after a criticism can transform the belief from "I am not capable" to "I am learning and improving." This cognitive restructuring is an essential aspect of addressing inner conflicts and enhancing decision-making capabilities. Moreover, techniques like self-affirmation can help in redirecting focus to positive attributes, further breaking the cycle of negative self-assessment.