Which statement best describes the role of women at the front lines of World War I?


Women were granted the right to take on combat roles such as gunner.


Women were applauded for their roles as nurses in army hospitals.


Women supported their husbands by cooking in camp and bringing water.


Women were mostly there to raise money and morale.

pls give me brainliest <3 hope this helps!

1. How did General Douglas MacArthur react to the events in Korea? What was his stance on the Korean War?

- MacArthur was allocated to be leading in the United Nations troops by President Harry S Truman. President Truman’s objective was to refurbish harmony in Korea meaning both North and South Korea as quickly as possible. Under no circumstances did Truman want to give the Chinese a reason to enter the war. He wanted MacArthur to stay away from the Chinese border. Instead of following Truman's orders, MacArthur did things his way. He thought that the Chinese would not join in the war, so he assured Truman that the Chinese army would not take part in the war when the UN forces reach the Yalu River, the border between China and North Korea.

2. How did President Truman respond to the events in Korea? What was his stance on the Korean War?

- President Truman assigned General MacArthur as leader of the UN troops. Truman's overall objective was to create harmony between North and South Korea as soon as possible. He was concerned of the Chinese army joining in the war in favor of North Korea, but MacArthur assured him that the Chinese would not interfere when they reach the Yalu River; however, he was wrong. Because MacArthur disobeyed the orders, Truman relieved MacArthur of his position.

3. Which leader's actions were the most justifiable—General McArthur's or President Truman's? Support your claim with evidence from the lesson.

- President Truman's actions should be more justifiable. McArthur disobeyed orders and made the war much more deadly than it was originally. The idea of Truman was to find a political diplomatic way to resolve the conflict while McArthur wanted to fight and even involve China in the war and Truman knew how dangerous it would be to involve China.

4. Would the outcome of the Korean War have been different had General MacArthur not been fired? Why or why not? Support your claim with evidence from the lesson.

- No, I do not believe that the outcome of the Korean War would have been different because the Chinese had already entered the war long before MacArthur was fired and it was MacArthur’s fault that the Chinese had even entered the war. MacArthur probably would have just made even more of a mess if he hadn’t been fired.

Answer: Britain

Explanation:

When the British arrived in America, the British introduced what represented what we know as corporations, the Joint Stock Companies. Those stocks were sold to investors and it was capital at low ris. So, Joint Stock Companies were organizations meant to establish colonies in the Americas by people from Britain.

The main objective of genocide is to persecute a minority in the area. Thus, option B is correct.

Genocide is an international crime in which acts are performed with the goal to eliminate a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group in whole or in part.

Persecuted people are punished brutally and unlawfully, frequently because of their race or religious convictions.

Therefore, Option B Persecute people who are less in majority  is considered as objective of genocide.

Learn more about genocide, here:

https://brainly.com/question/9675078

#SPJ2

Inductive reasoning is a type of logical thinking that is usually based on specific experiences or observations, common in descriptive and experimental sciences like biology. It involves making general conclusions based on specific instances and observations. Deductive reasoning, in contrast, makes specific predictions based on general premises.

The type of reasoning that is usually based on specific experiences or observations is inductive reasoning. This form of logical thinking uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It's common in descriptive and experimental science, like biology where observations and recordings of data are made. These data can be either qualitative or quantitative.

Let's take an example, in brain studies, scientists observe many living brains while performing a certain activity to see which part of the brain "lights up". The latter is then predicted to be the part controlling the specific response to the stimulus. This process of making generalizations inferred from careful observation and analysis of a large amount of data is how inductive reasoning operates.

On the other hand, deductive reasoning which is also a type of logical thinking, moves in the opposite direction. It starts from general premises and predicts specific results, often used in hypothesis-based science. In essence, Inductive reasoning proceeds from the particular to the general and deductive reasoning from general to the particular.

https://brainly.com/question/13445962

#SPJ3

Answer: The right answer is the A) Europe imports large amounts of raw materials for its manufacturing industry, and industrialization without regulation has resulted in air and water pollution.

Explanation: Just to elaborate a little on the answer, it can be added that since they are asking you to consider the relationship between the fact that the majority of Europe’s raw materials are imported and the air and water pollution in Europe today, options C and D should be discarded, since they do not explain that relationship—option C links the pollution to careless farming practices and option D links the pollution to the Industrial Revolution. which dates back to the 18th century. Option B connects the two events—Europe requires raw materials because it does not have them anymore, and pollution has been caused by the depletion of those materiales—but the option that best explains the relationship is the A. Industry is indeed a main source of pollution in Europe, although less pollutants have been released to the air and to the water in the last years. Europe imports a large amount of raw materials for its manufacturing industry, and a limited regulation has led to water and air pollution caused by industrial practices.      

Answer:

Ronald Reagan

Explanation:

Despite Woodrow Wilson's public stances advocating for peace, his decision to lead the U.S. into World War I in 1917 contradicted his known quote, demonstrating that his actions did not always reflect his words.

Woodrow Wilson, the 28th President of the United States, often committed to concepts of peace, as exemplified in his famous quote, 'There must be, not a balance of power, but a community of power; not organized rivalries, but an organized peace.' However, his actions contradicted these words in several instances, such as when he led the U.S. into World War I in 1917. This had been despite his reelection campaign prominently featuring the slogan 'He kept us out of war.' These decisions make it clear that Wilson's actions did not always align with his public stances, creating a stark contrast to his quote espousing peace and community.

https://brainly.com/question/32297009

#SPJ3

The correct answer is C.

The effect of the Platt Amendment was that it “established a Civil Government in Cuba”. This was an amendment between the USA and Spain, which states that "The United States would end its military occupation of Cuba". Through this Amendment Cuba became the protectorate of the United States. This amendment provided the United States to lease or buy lands for establishing naval bases and coaling stations in Cuba.

Answer:

Small jumps in species evolution, like size, strength, speed, color, etc.

Explanation:

Evolution distinguished both eras and periods. The thing is that eras involved bigger adaptation changes like the jump from unicellular to pluricellular beings. However, periods were marked by very different and smaller changes in species, like developing stronger muscles, lighter bodies, bigger jaws, smaller paws, etc. The periods always showed how different life forms improved their bodies with baby steps, instead of big jumps.

The United States supported a new anticommunist government in South Vietnam.

Some of the most severe restrictions placed on women after the Gupta dynasty developed Hindu laws are

  Gender inequality is the act of ascribing a lower status to a particular gender most especially to the female gender.

   Gender inequality is as old as man. It has been around for thousands of years. Gender inequality promotes the idea that the male gender is superior to the female gender and as such, females should be subservient to males.

    The Gupta dynasty imposed a lot of restrictions on women after the the development of Hindu laws such as denying women the choice of whom to marry, not owning land, women of lower caste should also align with the occupation of their parents to forestall any type of development etc.

Learn more about Gender Inequality at https://brainly.com/question/1087314

#spj2

Being a Washington, D.C. “outsider” benefitted Jimmy Carter by allowing him to bring fresh perspectives, but it also hindered his ability to gain legislative success.

Jimmy Carter’s status as a Washington, D.C. “outsider” had both benefits and drawbacks. One benefit was that Carter was seen as someone who could bring fresh perspectives and new ideas to the political establishment. His lack of previous experience in Washington helped him to appeal to voters who were disillusioned with political corruption.

However, being an outsider also had few drawbacks. Carter at that time faced challenges in getting support from key members of Congress because he excluded them from the decision-making process, preferring to rely on his own panels of experts to draft legislation. This alienated Congress and hindered Carter’s ability to gain legislative success.

Final answer:

The Korean War, Cuban missile crisis, and Vietnam War were all significantly affected by the Cold War's ideological battles between communism and democracy, with the U.S. and USSR backing conflicting sides leading to proxy wars and near-nuclear confrontations.

Explanation:

The Cold War created a global environment characterized by ideological struggle between communism and democracy, leading to significant geopolitical tensions and proxy wars. During the Korean War, the North supported by communist allies China and the Soviet Union, and the South supported by the United States and other United Nations members, fought as a direct consequence of Cold War divisions. The Cuban missile crisis was another significant event influenced by the Cold War dichotomy.

After a failed U.S.-backed attempt to overthrow the Cuban socialist government, the Soviet Union's decision to place nuclear missiles in Cuba was a direct challenge to U.S. hegemony in the Western Hemisphere and was nearly the tipping point into nuclear war. Lastly, the Vietnam War reflected Cold War tensions, with the U.S. involving itself heavily to prevent a communist takeover of South Vietnam, fearing the domino effect that could spread communism throughout Southeast Asia.

In essence, Cold War divisions had a profound effect on these conflicts, with each event encapsulating the struggle between U.S. and Soviet ideologies and their attempts to expand their spheres of influence, often at the cost of regional stability and human lives.