Answer:
He believed it shouldn’t be a popularity contest.
John Adams, the second President of the United States, did not actively campaign for his second term for several reasons:
Divisions within his own political party.Opposition from Democratic-Republicans.Adams' focus on diplomacy.Divisions within his own political party: Adams was a member of the Federalist Party, but his presidency was marked by internal divisions within the party.
Opposition from Democratic-Republicans: The Democratic-Republican Party, led by Thomas Jefferson, was the main opposition party to Adams and the Federalists.
Adams' focus on diplomacy: During his presidency, Adams was deeply involved in foreign affairs and diplomatic negotiations, particularly with France.
Ultimately, Adams lost the election to his Vice President, Thomas Jefferson, in what became known as the "Revolution of 1800." Adams' decision not to actively campaign, along with the political climate and his party's internal divisions, played a role in his defeat.
Learn more about Federalist Party here:
brainly.com/question/29762369
#SPJ4
What are dockworkers back in 1700’a
Answer:
Dockworkers are duties including transferring cargo from ship to dock.
Explanation:
and securing ships and handling unloading set-up.
What were six important sets of actions and reactions in the head 1824 to 1846 that lead to war between the US and Mexico
Answer:
Texas was originally a part of Mexico and had a greater population of its citizens in the area.
The most important set of actions which led to the war between US and Mexico include
U.S. Senate defeating the agreement of annexation with Texas
U.S. President John Tyler signing the Brown Resolution which offered Texas terms of annexation.
In response to passage of the Brown Resolution, Mexico's minister to the U.S., Juan N. Almonte, requests his passports, breaking off diplomatic relations between the two countries
Texas convention votes in favor of annexation to the United States
In Matamoros, Mexican General Francisco Mejia issues a proclamation threatening hostilities against U.S. troops
United States declares war against Mexico and US troops occupy Matamoros.
How does Bierce's methodic writing style of providing detailed descriptions in a quiet, slow, suspenseful manner affect the reader? Provide examples (like how he describes the rifles in "support" position, or the sound of his own watch ticking).
Bierce uses the method to draw out a single moment in the life of the person to a long drawn introspection on life.
Explanation:
The Incident at Owl Creek Bridge by Bierce is one of the great short stories of all time.
It uses the last instant of a life of a solider who is sentenced to death for his introspection on life and his hope of escaping the ordeal.
This is drawn out in suspense by the methodical writing style of the writer who draws out the moment into a story that we start believing that he has actually escaped.
By the time the reality hits us the, he is already dead.
Bierce's methodic writing style, with detailed descriptions in a quiet, slow, suspenseful manner, heightens the reader's sense of anticipation and immersion in the story.
The methodic writing style of Ambrose Bierce, characterized by detailed descriptions delivered in a quiet, slow, and suspenseful manner, serves to immerse the reader deeply into the narrative.
This style can create a palpable atmosphere that enhances the story's emotional impact and keeps the reader engaged. Bierce's attention to detail and his careful pacing allow readers to visualize scenes vividly and experience the tension and anticipation that the characters might be feeling.For example, in "An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge," Bierce describes the soldiers' rifles in the "support" position with meticulous detail, creating a calm yet tense atmosphere. Similarly, the sound of the protagonist's watch ticking is described so vividly that it amplifies the suspense, making the reader acutely aware of each passing second and the protagonist's heightened perception in his final moments.What are the most recognized causes of poverty?
-equality and marginalization.
-Conflict.
-Hunger, malnutrition, and stunting.
-Poor healthcare systems — especially for mothers and children.
-Little or no access to clean water, sanitation, and hygiene.
-Climate change.
-Lack of education.
-Poor public works and infrastructure.
Answer:
the most recognized causes of poverty are
illiteracy population increaselack of awarenesslack of family planning measures.Explanation:
When European nations established colonies in Africa in the late 1800s, they
controlled colonies’ government but gave colonies economic control.
allowed colonies to run their government but held economic control.
exercised complete economic and political control over the colonies.
negotiated with colonies to determine economic and political control.
Answer: Explanation:
They set up Imperial governments in the land to exploit the natural and human resources of the continent.
Each European countries involved aimed to increase its prestige by accumulating territories in other parts of the world including Africa. By 1900,the Berlin conference to divide Africa brought about nominal control of African territory by Europe. All this was done without the consent of African people.
The European nations basically want cheap labors that they cannot get from their own country..so in search of cheap labors they set up a base at south Africa and stated deporting slaves..
The European nations sought to expand their economies by obtaining raw materials from Africa which could be transported back to domestic factories and turned into manufactured goods for sale at the expense of the African people.
When European nations established colonies in Africa in the late 1800s, they exercised complete economic and political control over the colonies. Thus, option (c) is correct.
What is colonies?Between the 15th and 20th centuries, when European nations colonized the Americas, Africa, and Asia for economic, political, and strategic reasons, the term "colony" was most frequently used to refer to these settlements.
The Berlin Conference of 1884 set the laws for European colonization and trade in Africa, which in turn regulated the colonization of Africa. The colonization of Africa was fueled by competition among European nations for control of African resources.
As a result, the significance European nations established colonies in Africa in the late 1800s are the aforementioned. Therefore, option (c) is correct.
Learn more about on colonies, here:
https://brainly.com/question/13673860
#SPJ5
Which side had more resources during the Civil War?
Answer:
The North
Explanation:
The North had more resources because President abe lincoln was the president at the time and he was supplying resources only to the north not the south.
15 POINTS A.S.A.P
Why did Americans want to acquire California?
Answer:
America wanted California because of the gold available there that they didn't want other countries to get.They also wanted to express there natural born right o Manifest destiny on their newly found land.
Explanation:
Which statement is true about personal narrative essays?
A.
They are normally written in chronological order.
B.
They are written about the life of a famous person.
C.
They are stories that are entirely fictional.
D.
They contain a main point that is supported by evidence.
Answer:
A.
They are normally written in chronological order.
*It cant be B because it doesn't have to be a famous person and it cant be C because its non-fiction. And not D because that is an argument/persuasive essay
Personal narrative essays are written accounts of personal experiences or events from the author's life. The true statement about personal narrative essays is, "They are normally written in chronological order". Hence, option A is the correct answer.
They typically follow a chronological order, presenting the events in the order in which they occurred. This helps to create a coherent and organized narrative that allows the reader to follow the story and understand the progression of events.
Option B is not accurate because personal narrative essays are focused on the author's own life experiences, not those of a famous person.
Option C is also incorrect because personal narrative essays are based on real-life experiences and are non-fictional in nature.
Option D is not always true for personal narrative essays.
Hence, option A is the correct answer.
Learn more about Personal narrative essays here:
brainly.com/question/7851404
#SPJ4
Which forms of government are described in the chart above?
A.communism
B.autocracy
C.monarchy
D.socialism
How was religion of the Mesopotamia’s different from religion of the Israelites?
Answer:
Mesopotamian religion was polytheistic, while Israelsities worship Judaism.
why did Lobley oppose the new industrial machinery
Answer:
The industrial revolution began in Great Britain. The industrial revolution was the beginning of a new era, a new manufacturing of a new type of machinery.
Explanation:
Hope this helps
The industrial revolution began in the United Kingdom. The industrial revolution marked the start of a new era, with new machinery being manufactured.
What is industrial?
The term “industrial” refers to a large scale of manufacturing operations. The industrial work in particular areas is production in bulk. The industrial sector contributes to economic activity. The industrial are the main focuses are the production of the commodities. The industrial are the run with the large level of the workers.
During the period of the 1800s, the technology was the advanced level, the higher level of the employees and the workers are the work. There are the long work hours because of the production of the high level. There was the no hazard faced by industrial workers are the mainly in the high unemployment, that's the reason was the Lobley opposed.
As a result, the industrial revolution began in the United Kingdom. The industrial revolution marked the start of a new era, with new machinery being manufactured.
Learn more about on industrial, here:
https://brainly.com/question/4363767
#SPJ2
How did Napoleon acquire Louisiana from Spain?
Answer:
By pressuring them to sign a treaty that allowed them to get the land.
Explanation:
Not sure if you need the name of the treaty but it is the treaty of san ildefonso
The expressed powers of Congress include:
A. the Supreme Court.
B. regulating trade.
C. enforcing laws.
D. creating the Internal Revenue Service.
Answer:
C. Enforcing lawsseems to be the most correct
How did women’s rights activists link women’s rights to the Founding Fathers’ positions on equality and natural rights?
pls answer.
Women's rights activists linked their cause to principles of equality and natural rights from the Founding Fathers, asserting that rights like liberty and property should also apply to women. They referenced historical documents such as the Declaration of Independence in their fight, as seen with the 1848 Declaration of Sentiments demanding political equality and suffrage. They were also influenced by the egalitarian social roles of indigenous societies, like the Haudenosaunee.
Women's rights activists historically connected their cause to the principles of equality and natural rights espoused by the Founding Fathers. Abigail Adams's plea to 'Remember the ladies' during the Revolutionary discussions set an early precedent for this link. In echoing the language of the Declaration of Independence, activists argued that if 'all men are created equal' was a self-evident truth, this principle should logically also apply to women. Thus, notions like political equality, liberty, and the right to property were asserted to be as relevant to women as they were to men.
During the Seneca Falls Convention in 1848, activists, many of whom were also abolitionists, produced the Declaration of Sentiments which directly emulated the Declaration of Independence by including women in the assertion that 'all men and women are created equal.' This document catalogued the various ways in which women had been oppressed and, significantly, demanded suffrage—the right to vote—as essential to achieving equality.
In addition to referencing the ideals of the American Revolution, women's rights advocates were also inspired by indigenous societies, such as the Haudenosaunee (Iroquois), where women held significant social and political roles. The broader struggle for women's rights included fighting against institutionalized inequalities, as highlighted by activists like Betty Friedan who exposed gender-based wage disparities in the workforce. Thus, activists took a multifaceted approach that combined historical American principles with modern civil rights efforts to advocate for women's equality across social, political, and economic spheres.
Please help!!! Which of the four case studies (Italy, Germany, Dual Monarchy, Ottoman Empire) of nationalism was the most successful? Explain why.
Answer:
Germany
Explanation:
Otto van Bismarck used nationalism to unite the German people and expand Prussia/Germany's military and land to become one of Europe's best militaries
Kennedy and Civil Rights
How did President Kennedy's position on civil rights change?
He became more cautious over time.
O He began to see a need for national civil rights laws.
* He discovered that civil rights laws were not needed.
Answer: He began to see a need for national civil right laws.
Explanation: I hope this help you!!!!!!!
Answer:
He began to see a need for national civil rights laws
Explanation:
Why did the Roman Empire face economice problems
Answer:
Rome fell through a gradual process because poor economic policies led to a weakened military which allowed the barbarians easy access to the empire
Explanation:
How would you have reacted to this Call to Power if you were a Bolshevik? How would you have reacted if you were a member of the provisional government?
As a Bolshevik, the most likely reaction to the Call to Power would be one of euphoria and excitement. As a member of the Provisional government however, one would react with dread and uncertainty.
What was the Call to Power?It was issued by Lenin on October 24, 1917.It gave reasons why the Bolsheviks should seize power in Russia.Lenin was a Bolshevik which meant that Bolsheviks listening to this call would most likely have been excited at the chance to take control. Members of the Provisional government however, would most likely have been afraid as they were the ones in power and so would be overthrown by the Bolsheviks.
In conclusion, Bolsheviks would have been excited and Provisional government members would have been scared.
Find out more on the Bolsheviks at https://brainly.com/question/1106721.
As a Bolshevik, you'd likely support the call to power due to a shared revolutionary and communist ideology, whereas as a member of the provisional government, you'd be alarmed by the Bolsheviks' threat to your authority. If the provisional government had made peace with the Central Powers, it might have undermined support for Lenin's Bolsheviks, although this would depend on the efficacy of the government's other reforms.
Explanation:If you were a Bolshevik during the call to power, you would likely react with enthusiasm and a revolutionary spirit. The Bolsheviks were intent on seizing power and implementing radical changes according to Communist principles. They were driven by the urgent needs of the Russian populace, namely "peace, land, and bread," and were ready to capitalize on the weakness of the provisional government and widespread disillusionment with the ongoing war. As a member of the provisional government, such as those led by Alexander Kerensky, you would likely react to the Bolshevik's call to power with opposition and concern, recognizing the significant threat they posed to your temporary authority and the liberal and democratic ideals you were possibly trying to uphold. The provisional government aimed for a gradual transition of power, but the Bolsheviks were determined to institute immediate and sweeping changes.
Considering a hypothetical situation where the provisional government had agreed to peace with the Central Powers to focus on solving Russia's internal issues, it's conceivable that this move could have undermined support for Lenin and the Bolsheviks. By addressing the urgent demands for peace, the provisional government might have satisfied a significant part of the population's immediate needs, potentially reducing the appeal of the Bolsheviks' radical approach to those issues. However, if the government failed to address the demands for land reform and food security effectively, the Bolsheviks would likely continue to gain support.
Throughout the period leading up to the October Revolution in 1917, the Bolsheviks were increasingly seen by soldiers, workers, and peasants as a viable alternative to the current government due to their decisive and straightforward promises. The Bolsheviks' subsequent actions, such as the signing of the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk with Germany, illustrated their commitment to fulfilling their promises, despite the unfavorable terms of the peace that ceded vast territories to Germany.
Learn more about Bolsheviks' Call to Powerhttps://brainly.com/question/15854957
#SPJ3
Who was the first emperor of Rome?
Nero
O Constantine
O Julius Caesar
O Caesar Augustus
Answer:
Caesar Augustus
Explanation:
I Just know
Compare and contrast the governments of the Mauryan Empire and the Gupta Empire. List three similarities between the empires. List three differences between the empires.
Both the Mauryan and Gupta Empires in India unified smaller kingdoms, promoted culture, and had strong leadership. The Mauryan empire focused more on military and bureaucracy, and embraced Buddhism under Ashoka. In contrast, the Gupta Empire, while also militant, spent more time on culture and was predominantly Hindu.
Explanation:The governments of the Mauryan and Gupta Empires in India share some similarities, along with several notable differences. Both empires tried to rule a diverse society by adopting certain measures. They merged various smaller kingdoms into a unified empire and reached their heights under exceptional leaders like Ashoka of the Mauryan empire, and Chandragupta of the Gupta empire. Both empires also promoted learning and culture, with Sanskrit becoming influential in the Gupta times.
However, there were some distinct differences as well. The Mauryan Empire had a stronger military focus, possessing a large and well-administrated army, navy, and cavalry division, also a widespread bureaucracy catering to industries like weaving, mining, shipbuilding, road construction, etc. On the flip side, the Gupta Empire, while also having a military, focused more on cultural growth and learning, leading to a flourishing in arts, literature, and science.
The Mauryan Empire, under Ashoka, embraced Buddhism and promoted harmony and compassionate governance. In contrast, the Gupta era was predominantly Hindu and is known as the 'Golden Age of Hinduism', although they were tolerant of other religions.
Learn more about Mauryan and Gupta Empires here:https://brainly.com/question/502631
#SPJ2
Which origin of government theory is the US democracy based off of? *
O
Evolutionary Theory
Divine Right Theory
O
Force Theory
O
Social Contract Theory
Answer:
divine right theory
evolutionary theory
The US democracy is based on the Social Contract Theory. The correct option is D.
According to the Social Contract Theory, there is an unspoken agreement or contract between the government and the people it governs that gives rise to its legitimacy. In accordance with this view, people voluntarily band together and agree to form a government in order to safeguard their natural rights and advance their interests.
The consent of the governed, in turn, is where the government draws its power and authority. The social contract idea had a significant impact on how US democratic values were formed.
Thus, the ideal selection is option D.
Learn more about the Social Contract Theory here:
https://brainly.com/question/12137843
#SPJ7
Significance of the League of Nations to world history
The League of Nations was important in history as the first international body aimed at preventing war, which faced membership and efficacy challenges, leading to its replacement by the UN after World War II.
Explanation:The League of Nations holds significant historical relevance as it was the first major attempt to create an international organization tasked with maintaining global peace and preventing future conflicts post-World War I. Despite its intention for collective security and dispute resolution, it faced critical challenges such as the absence of the United States, and the inability to prevent aggressive actions by expansionist nations leading up to World War II.
The failures of the League contributed to world history by demonstrating the weaknesses of international organizations without universal support and by laying the foundational principles that would be used to establish the United Nations, a more robust global institution for peacekeeping established after the Second World War.
The League's influence on the United States trended towards isolationism, a result of the Senate's refusal to join due to concerns over national sovereignty and entanglements in European politics. This refusal to ratify the Treaty of Versailles, which founded the League, marked a period where the U.S. pursued a more isolationist foreign policy, avoiding involvement in certain international alliances and disputes.
Ultimately, while the outbreak of World War II less than 20 years after the conclusion of the First World War may be seen as a failure of the League's objectives, it highlighted the necessity for a stronger and more inclusive international framework, leading to the establishment of the United Nations with the support of the United States and initially 51 member states.
Toward which city were Union forces heading
when they met the Confederates at
Fredericksburg?
A. Chancellorsville
B. Manassas
C. Richmond
The union forces where heading towards (C) Richmond when they met the Confederates at Fredericksburg
Explanation:
The Battle of Fredericksburg refers to the battle that was fought between the Union forces and the Confederate Army of Northern Virginia in the year 1862.
The union forces where led by Maj Gen. Ambrose Burnside. and the Confederate Army of Northern Virginia General Robert E. Lee
Major General Ambrose Burnside led the Union toward Richmond and they headed towards the Confederates at Fredericksburg.
This battle (i.e. Battle of Fredericksburg) was a big defeat for the Union Army against the Confederate Army of Northern Virginia
Thus we can say that The union forces where heading towards (C) Richmond when they met the Confederates at Fredericksburg
When did the Holocaust happen? Who was responsible for it?
Answer:
between 1941 and 1945
Explanation:Hitler and Nazis were responsible.
make this brainliest!
Answer:
The Holocaust started in 1941. And it ended around May 8, 1945. The people that were responsible for it were the German Nazi's.
Explanation:
Hope this helped
:)
According to his journals, why does John Quincy Adams believe that prohibiting slavery in the
western territories is, in fact, constitutional?
The ideals of the nation are set forth in the introduction to the United States Constitution, and they include justice. Therefore, because slavery is unjust, the leaders of the nation have every right to prevent its spread into new territories
John Quincy Adams was the 6th president of the United States. He was famous for being politically independent and also his patriotism for his country. He can be called ambitious as well as determined in character.
Further information about the president is as given below:
• According to the journals of John Quincy Adams, he held the belief that prohibition of slavery in the western countries was constitutional.
• In the constitution of the United States, the ideals for the country have been written and they include the term justice.
• Slavery should be prohibited as it is simply unjust, which is mentioned in the constitution as well.
Therefore, John Quincy Adams had strong feelings regarding the prohibition of slavery during his presidency.
Learn more about John Quincy Adams here:
https://brainly.com/question/2772596
In 2000, Republican George W. Bush ran against Al Gore, who had served as VP under Clinton. true or false
Answer:
tRUE
Explanation:
41TH PRESIDENTAL ELECTION!
Final answer:
The statement regarding the 2000 presidential election featuring Republican George W. Bush against Democrat Al Gore, the VP under Clinton, is true. This election was notable for its close and controversial outcome, which ultimately led to Bush's victory in the Electoral College, despite losing the popular vote to Gore.
Explanation:
The statement that in 2000, Republican George W. Bush ran against Al Gore, who had served as VP under Clinton, is true. The 2000 presidential election is a significant event in American history, as it concluded with a contentious outcome following a narrow Supreme Court decision in Bush v. Gore. Al Gore, as the Democratic nominee and former Vice President under Bill Clinton, faced George W. Bush, the Republican nominee and Governor of Texas. Despite the economic successes of the Clinton administration, the Bush campaign sought to capitalize on the moral controversies of the White House, while Gore aimed to distance himself from Clinton's scandals.
Although Al Gore had considerable experience and even led in early polls, George W. Bush's compassionate conservatism and promises of integrity in the White House helped him win the Electoral College. The election is remembered for its dramatic conclusion, hinging on the contentious Florida vote count and the subsequent Supreme Court ruling. This election has since been a topic of extensive study and discussion in American political history.
Which of the following explains why the Middle East is rich in oil?
A. They have not used all their Reserves
B. The Dictators there protect it
C. It is by a coastline
D.its where two tectonic plates collide
Answer:
I think B or D
Explanation:
Answer: C
Explanation:
Why did the Romans create a Republic? Please help DUE SOON!!!!!
What does the baby in this cartoon represent?
o slavery
o freedom
o the United States
Answer:
C: The United States
Explanation:
The baby in the cartoon represent United States. The cartoon is urging people to vote. Thus, the correct answer is option C.
What are the Voting rights in the United States?Throughout US history, voting rights, specifically the enfranchisement and disenfranchisement of various groups, have been a moral and political issue.
In the United States, voting eligibility is governed by the United States Constitution as well as federal and state laws. Several constitutional amendments (specifically the Fifteenth, Nineteenth, and Twenty-sixth) require that voting rights of U.S. citizens not be restricted on the basis of race, color, previous condition of servitude, gender, or age.
Under the "one man, one vote" principle, the 1964 Supreme Court case Reynolds v. Sims ruled that both houses of all state legislatures had to be based on electoral districts that were approximately equal in population size.
Therefore, the baby in the cartoon is United States.
To learn more about Voting rights, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29330443
#SPJ6
The image of the carton is attached below,
Describe three positive effects the Civil War had on the economy of Texas.
Answer:
The Civil War helped the Texas economy develop at a fast rate. For example, Texas developed a high-tech industry after a slump in oil prices, continued reliance on oil production which brought in more money for the economy, and had a boom and bust cycle of the oil industry.