By 2100, if we had a population of 100 million, we wouldn't need as much money from the government to pay for things like health care, old-age security, and other services. The Canadian economy would also benefit from an increase in skilled labor, innovation, and dynamism.
Why did people immigrate to Canada in 1900?The Canadian government encouraged immigrants from numerous European nations to come to Canada between 1891 and 1914. The Canadian government sought immigrants who could assist clear the land, constructing roads and railroads, and establishing farms to generate food for a developing nation.
A large number of immigrants—mostly from Europe—came to Canada between 1901 and 1911, setting a record for immigration growth at the time. Fertility was likewise high, with a mean of nearly five offspring per woman. The baby boom that followed the Second World War was caused by a large increase in fertility.
Learn more about Canada here:
https://brainly.com/question/22682396
#SPJ5
What are three ways that the United States reacted to fear of communism at home?
Which statement fits the ideas of Athenian democracy?
A) A few people hold all the power.
B) Some people are more equal than others.
C) There is a powerful ruling class.
D) The people hold the power collectively.
Athenian democracy represent the idea of the people holding the power collectively.
What is Athenian Democracy?Athenian Democracy is developed around 6th century B.C in Athens. The are where it is practiced was Athens and near by areas of Attica.
Athens practiced a political system of legislation and executive bills. Participation was open to adult and male citizens who were probable 30% of the total population.
The democratic model based on three pillars:
-The assembly of DEMOS
-The council of 500
-The people's Court.
They were supplemented by the council of the Areopagus, the Archons and the Generals.
The assembly was the regular gathering of male Athenian citizens and women also enjoyed right without political one, to listen , discuss and vote on decrees affecting the aspect of life both public and private.
In assembly, each male citizen of Athens could speak regardless of his station. The assembly discuss the affair of the citizen having freedom to speak, which was vital to have proper functioning of the Assembly .
Citizens were paid to attend the assembly to ensure maximum and collective participation
To learn more about Athenian Democracy here
https://brainly.com/question/15063692
#SPJ3
What can be said about the slave trade?
What made manchuria attractive to the japanese?
a. it had a large japanese population.
b. it was rich in natural resources.
c. it was the closest japanese territory to china.
d. it had a nationalist government?
Manchuria was attractive to Japan due to its rich natural resources, strategic location, and cooperation with the nationalist government.
Explanation:The main reason that Manchuria was attractive to the Japanese was that it was rich in natural resources. This region had abundant reserves of coal, iron ore, and other minerals, which were highly sought after by Japan. These resources were essential for Japan's expanding industrial economy and military ambitions.
Additionally, the proximity of Manchuria to China made it strategically significant for Japan. Control over Manchuria would give Japan a foothold in mainland Asia, allowing them to expand their influence and exert control over the region.
Lastly, the nationalist government in Manchuria, known as the Manchukuo regime, provided a favorable environment for Japanese interests. The collaboration between the Manchukuo government and Japan allowed for the exploitation of resources and the establishment of Japanese settlements in the region.
Learn more about Manchuria's attractiveness to Japan here:https://brainly.com/question/31544574
#SPJ3
In the 1997 reno v. aclu case, the u.s. supreme court unanimously voted to strike down the anti-indecency provisions of the communications decency act (cda) because they violated the:
How did World War II change life for many women?
What group in england proved the greatest threat to the divine right of kings? dutch puritans catholic clergy aristocrats?
The Dutch West India Company wanted to establish a colony in North America to expand its trading empire. enjoy religious freedom. encourage Catholics to leave Holland. form a representative democracy.
Answer:
To expand its trading empire.Explanation:
The Dutch West India Company was allowed an imposing business model of the trade with the Americas and Africa and the Atlantic areas between them. With military and money related help from the States General, the organization procured ports on the west African drift to supply slaves for manors in the West Indies and South America.
What might have been considered surprising about John Marshall's action in establishing judicial review?
The most surprising factor of John Marshall’s creation of the judicial review is that this decision is not located anywhere on the US Constitution. The Judge created this principle out of a conception he had about the role of the Federal government and the role of the Constitution on the American Legal system.
The decision that seemed surprising about John Marshall's action in establishing judicial review was the fact that his decision was not located anywhere on the US constitution.
Who was John Marshall?John Marshall was an American politician and Lawyer was served as the fourth chief judge of the United States of America. He served from 1801 till his death in 1835.
He was known for his contribution to the US when he established the prestige and power of the Judiciary so that it had an equal standing with the executives thereby creating a balanced government.
But he made the surprising decision that was not located in the constitution of the US.
He created the principle out of an idea he had about the duty of the federal government and the role of the constitution on the American legal team.
Learn more about John Marshall here:
https://brainly.com/question/925686
When congress sent andrew johnson the civil rights bill of 1866, he: signed it, creating an irreparable breach between himself and the republicans. argued that it discriminated against whites. contended that it gave too much authority to the states. won widespread public approval for his response. suggested that it did not go far enough to secure racial equality?
Which issue did the Supreme Court answer in the case of Duncan v. Louisiana?
The answer is: During the Duncan vs Louisiana case, the Supreme Court answered whether the Sixth Amendment guarantee of a jury trial applies to the states or not.
The Duncan Vs Louisiana was a very significant ruling by the Supreme Court and it incorporated the 6th Amendement right to a jury trial in all States.
The case took place in 1968 during the time of huge racial tensions. Gary Duncan was the name of a 19 year old teenage African-American boy who was charged with battery in the State of Louisiana without a jury trial.
With an appeal, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Duncan 7-2 and ensuring that every person has the right to a jury trial.
1968 Duncan v. Louisiana demanded the Supreme Court to ascertain whether a state could refuse someone the freedom to a claim by jury. The Supreme Court found that a person afflicted with sedate criminal malfeasance is confirmed a tribunal trial supported by the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments.
Further Explanation:
Duncan v. Louisiana petitioned the Supreme Court to ascertain whether a state could refuse anyone right to a hearing by jury. The resolution declared that not all criminal aggression is "severe" sufficiently to demand a tribunal trial supported the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments. The Court legislated it apparently that insignificant attacks did not demand a lawsuit by jury, supporting the popular traditional law practice of applying a tribunal hearing to arbitrate petty crimes. The Justices concluded that there was neither "strong indication" that the Composers of the Constitution intended to guarantee the right to a hearing by judges for small charges. To segregate a "severe crime" from a "small crime," the court observed to District of Columbia v. Clawans. In such a case, the court used scientific standards and concentrated on the current laws and methods in national courts to ascertain whether an insignificant attack demanded a jury trial. In Duncan v. Louisiana, the majority assessed models in the national tribunals, state tribunals, and American constitutional practices of 18th century to command that a crime condemned by up to two years in penitentiary could not be charged a small malfeasance.
Learn more:
1. What was the status of us workplace safety laws in 1900? https://brainly.com/question/1233502
2. Problem on the establishment clause. https://brainly.com/question/10628112
Answer Details:
Grade: High School
Subject: History
Chapter: Duncan Vs Louisiana Case
Keywords:
Duncan, lawsuit , legislated, Columbia, district , model , crime , guarantee, criminal , tribunal , practice judge.
How did stalin use censorship and propaganda to support his rule?
What were the strengths and weaknesses of the articles of confederation for kids?
Answer:
wow
Explanation:
Western comedy disappeared after the collapse of rome but reappeared during ___ in the form of farce.
What event started world war ii? when did it occur?
The maize culture of the southwest was most similar to the pre-columbian culture of the
Compare the tactics used by the French troops in the French and Indian War with those of the American patriots during the Revolution?
will fan and medal
The 13th 14th and 15th amendments to the constitution were determined by all of the following except
Which answer best describes how the concept of liberty influenced Eastern Europe in the late nineteenth century?
It convinced the nobility to approve limited natural rights.
It sparked nationalist and revolutionary movements.
It prompted nationalists to support the government in power.
It spurred pogroms across most of Russia.
The correct answer is It sparked nationalist and revolutionary movements.
Increased nationalism prompted people to fight for their own cultural and national identity. Consequently, people engaged in protests and strikes aimed at changing their governments as people sought independence and to form their own nations
Answer:
A. It convinced the nobility to approve limited natural rights.
The motive behind the high tariffs imposed by nations on imports of manufactured goods, prior to world war ii, was to:
When president eisenhower sent federal troops to little rock, arkansas during the school integration crisis, he was exercising his constitutional power as:?
According to Clinton, what were two ways that NAFTA would affect United States
According to Clinton, the two ways that NAFTA would affect United States were increased jobs and lower prices.
According to Bill Clinton, the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) would result in increased jobs and lower prices.
The North American Free Trade Agreement is an agreement signed by Canada, Mexico, and the United States in order to create a trilateral trade bloc in North America. The agreement came into force on January 1, 1994.
What was a long-term effect of the stock-market crash?
A. People had more money to spend.
B. Banks made more short-term loans.
C. Many banks closed.
D. Banks had more money to invest.
the answer is c. many banks closed
What party change occurred in austria that allowed hitler to implement his plan for anschluss?
"You must pursue this investigation of Watergate even if it leads to the president. I'm innocent. You've got to believe me, I'm innocent. If you don't, take my job."
-Richard Nixon, 1973
President Nixon made this statement during the investigation of what came to be known as the Watergate Scandal. What was the result of this investigation for President Nixon?
A) He was cleared of any wrongdoing.
B) Facing impeachment, he resigned from office.
C) President Nixon lost his bid for re-election to Jimmy Carter.
D) He was impeached, tried in the Senate, and removed from office.
B) Facing impeachment, he resigned from office.
After the Watergate Scandal (June 1972), in which President Nixon was involved, many investigations were carried out so he could be brought to justice. However, two years later, the President decided to resign from office to avoid impeachment. And no sooner had Ford taken office, than he used his newly acquired power to pardon Nixon for any crimes he may have committed. As expected, his decision was harshly criticized and angered many Americans that wanted justice.
When Nixon says " I'm innocent. You've got to believe me (...) If you don't, take my job." he means that if it can not be proven that he was not involved in the scandal, then he'd resign so somebody else would take the Presidency.
What are the two principles to the jus in bello part of the just war theory?
Final answer:
The two principles to the jus in bello part of the just war theory are proportionality and discrimination.
Explanation:
The two principles of the jus in bello part of the just war theory are proportionality and discrimination.
Proportionality means that the use of force is justified only if the harm caused is proportionate to the good achieved. In other words, the benefits of the war must outweigh the costs.
Discrimination requires that the use of force be directed only at legitimate military targets and that non-combatants be spared from direct harm. This principle emphasizes the need to minimize civilian casualties and destruction.
HELP ME PLEASEEE ITS TIMED !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
As the tribe divided over voluntary removal, which two Cherokee emerged as leaders of opposite viewpoints?
A. Stand Waitie and Major Ridge
B. Elias Boudinot and John Ridge
C. Oceola and Dancing Rabbit
D. Major Ridge and John Ross
Answer:
The answer is D.
Correct me if i am wrong.
which statement describes a major similarity between the french and american revolution
In what ways were u.s. actions in Latin America during the early 1900s imperialist?
The United States could defend its territory while avoiding war by being solid in its determination and having the naval force to back up its interests. The corollary was not well received by Latin Americans.
What is the territory?A territory is an area of land, sea, or space, especially consisting or connected to a geographical area, person, or animal. In international politics, a territorial dominion is usually either the total region from which a state may obtain power resources or an administrative division is usually an area that is under the jurisdiction of a sovereign state.
The US intervened in the territory of Latin American politics when its interests were challenged or when it might gain an advantage by deploying military action, as in Panama.
Therefore, The United States could defend its territory while avoiding war by being solid in its determination and having the naval force to back up.
Learn more about territory here:
https://brainly.com/question/21152582
#SPJ2
Which type of imperial rule allowed western governments to run the colony themselves
Direct rule is the type of imperial rule where western governments ran the colony themselves, contrasting with indirect rule.
The type of imperial rule that allowed western governments to directly administer their colonies themselves was commonly known as direct rule. This contrasted with the indirect rule system, which utilized local native authorities to govern on behalf of the imperial powers. The British Crown, during the Restoration period, sought to reorganize existing colonies and create new ones under more direct royal authority to ensure that the colonies served the economic interests of the mother country effectively. Meanwhile, the French model was more assimilationist and centralizing, with a focus on integrating colonies directly into the imperial framework.