Why did Jefferson send Robert Livingston and James Monroe to France in 1802?

D) They sought to defend their nations against the Soviet Union.

Answer:

The correct answer is D. The common goal shared by the mujahideen, Solidarity, and freedom fighters was that all they sought to defend their nations against the Soviet Union.

Explanation:

-The mujahideen were formed in Afghanistan during the war against the Soviet Union to figtht the Soviet invasors through jihad and establish an islamic government in Afghanistan.

-Solidarity is a Polish trade union federation, founded in September 1980 and directed by Lech Walesa.

In the early 1980s, Solidarity became the first independent union in a country of the Soviet bloc and led to an anti-communist and non-violent social movement, which at its peak boasted approximately 10 million members and greatly contributed to the fall of communism in Europe.

U.S. policies like Lend-Lease, the Destroyers for Bases Agreement, and embargoes on Japan signaled a shift from neutrality.

Several U.S. policies have marked shifts away from a stance of neutrality:

1. Lend-Lease Act (1941):This allowed the U.S. to provide military aid to foreign nations during World War II, primarily the Allied powers, without direct involvement in the conflict.

2. Destroyers for Bases Agreement (1940): This arrangement saw the U.S. exchanging naval destroyers with the United Kingdom in return for land rights on British possessions in the Caribbean and Newfoundland, signaling increasing support for Allied powers before U.S. entry into World War II.

3. Atlantic Charter (1941): A joint declaration by the U.S. and the UK, outlining their goals for the post-war world. While not an official declaration of war, it demonstrated U.S. commitment to Allied principles and opposition to Axis aggression.

4. Embargo on Japan (1940-1941): The U.S. imposed embargoes on exports of oil and other resources to Japan in response to its expansionist actions in Asia, culminating in Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor and the subsequent entry of the U.S. into World War II.

These policies reflect a departure from strict neutrality and a growing involvement in global affairs, particularly in the context of World War II.

Answer:

A. Iroquois

Explanation:

Answer:

a conversation that annoys people nearby

Explanation:

A negative externality exists when the production or consumption of a product results in a cost to a third party. Air and noise pollution are commonly cited examples of negative externalities.

Nobles were able to choose a new king, while commoners were not is correct.

That's a challenging essay question.  There are arguments to be made from both sides, and the core of the argument is as old as the ideas of English philosophers Thomas Hobbes and John Locke.  

Thomas Hobbes believed that the social contract essentially meant that people will exchange some of their individual freedoms for common security. His treatise,  Leviathan (1651) supported a strong central government for the sake of a country's security and stability.  So if Hobbes were answering your question,m he'd say that the Department of Homeland Security is proper and needed in order to keep citizens safe.

John Locke's arguments in his Second Treatise on Civil Government (1689) were more focused on the rights of all persons and the protection of those rights in a society.  His view of the social contract saw the emphasis as benefiting all persons in their rights to life, liberty and property.  So Locke might look with a skeptical eye at the Department of Homeland Security, if it was shown to be infringing on individuals' rights and liberties.

In 1524, numerous German peasants petitioned the Holy Roman Emperor on their behalf. He wasn't in favor of it. Luther was a well-educated man who had little respect for the common people.

Holy Roman Emperor  was the emperor who oversaw the Holy Roman Empire as its head of state. The position was held along with that of king of Italy.

Because the empire was regarded by the Roman Catholic Church as the sole heir of the Roman Empire during the Middle Ages and the early Modern Period, the title of Holy Roman Emperor conferred the utmost status among medieval Roman Catholic kings.

The Holy Roman Emperor was to be considered the direct descendant of the Roman emperors, and it was believed that he had more power than all other European kings put together.

Thus, in 1524, numerous German peasants petitioned the Holy Roman Emperor on their behalf. He wasn't in favor of it. Luther was a well-educated man who had little respect for the common people.

To learn more about Holy Roman Emperor, refer to the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/2683043

#SPJ5

The answer is B) move the Indian population on to reservations. (I know this is a bit late but I'm just trying to acquire points.)

Answer:

Old Lights preachers believed religion should be practiced in a rational way while New Lights preachers propagated emotion in religion.

Explanation:

Which two sets of lines from the Doctor's speech in the play Everyman show that Everyman has to make his last journey alone?

To find out how many more metric tons of coal were produced in 1938 than in 1928, we can use the U.S. Energy Information Administration graph in Figure 1 to estimate the difference.

To find out how many more metric tons of coal were produced in 1938 than in 1928, we need to subtract the amount of coal produced in 1928 from the amount produced in 1938.

We don't have the exact data for coal production in 1928 and 1938, but we can use the information from the U.S. Energy Information Administration graph shown in Figure 1 to estimate the difference. From the graph, we can see that coal production increased from 1950 to 1980, so it is reasonable to assume that the production in 1938 was higher than in 1928.

Therefore, we can conclude that more metric tons of coal were produced in 1938 than in 1928, but we cannot determine the exact difference without more specific data.

The answer is true, sophism is known as "complicated" and "confusing"

Correct Answer: True

They moved to the west and worked on ranches and farms.

Hope this helps

No, not all urban communities should have one type of local government because different types of municipalities have evolved with varying needs and administrative requirements. The presence of different models such as the mayor-council system and council-manager system reflects the diverse conditions and challenges faced by municipalities. A single governance model is not feasible due to the distinct challenges and economies of scale in densely populated areas.

The question of whether all urban communities, including villages, towns, and cities, should have one type of local government is complex due to the diverse needs and conditions of various municipalities. Each municipality, governed by city, town, or borough governments, receives its authority from the state and has a significant impact on its citizens' daily lives. Given that there are nearly 19,500 municipal governments and approximately 16,500 township governments in the United States, it becomes evident that a single governance model may not fit all. The vast majority of municipal governments operate using either a mayor-council system or a council-manager system, depending on what best suits local needs.

Different types of municipalities, like hamlets, villages, towns, and cities, have evolved due to the population's transition from farming to specialized nonfarming jobs, requiring different levels of administration and public services. Disputes and the need for law enforcement necessitated the creation of localized governments. Furthermore, the concept of one giant city is impractical due to diseconomies of scale, such as traffic congestion, pollution, and crime, which can offset the benefits of economies of scale in densely populated urban areas.

Thus, considering the varied nature and size of communities as well as their unique challenges and advantages, it's not feasible for all urban communities to have one type of local government. The structure and purpose of municipal and county governments are crafted to address specific local issues, which underscores the importance of tailored governance models for different communities.

The debate on whether all urban communities should have one type of local government is complex. Local government structures vary widely to meet the specific needs and challenges of different communities. A one-size-fits-all approach may overlook the unique dynamics and necessities of each urban area, from hamlets to metropolises.

Whether all urban communities, villages, towns, and cities should have one type of local government is a matter of debate. The structure of local government can greatly affect citizens' lives, as municipalities have elected mayors or can be managed by appointed city managers. Municipal and county governments differ in structure and purpose, which is reflected in their varying needs and the services they provide. The idea of a single type of local government overseeing different urban forms ignores the unique challenges and requirements of each area, from hamlets and villages to cities and metropolises.

Considering that the United States consists of one national government, 50 state governments, and approximately 85,000 local governments, there is a high degree of diversity in how these entities are organized. Distinct geographies, economies, and community sizes necessitate different forms of governance. As cities and towns have evolved, the need for specialized administrators and public servants has increased, creating the need for varied local governments tailored to the specific circumstances and needs of each community.

The concept of economies of scale can apply to urban planning as well. While cities offer economic advantages, when they grow too large, negative factors such as traffic congestion, pollution, and crime may offset the benefits. These diseconomies suggest that a one-size-fits-all approach to local government may not be feasible or beneficial for all communities.

During the 1980s and 1990s, government cutbacks dramatically reduced support for housing, education, and healthcare on Native American reservations, exacerbating poverty and dependency. Termination policies eliminated federal aid and tribal land trust status, leading to significant hardships for Native communities.

Government cutbacks in the 1980s and 1990s significantly impacted the everyday life on Native American reservations. During this period, already limited federal aid for housing, education, healthcare, and essential services was further reduced, deepening poverty and undermining self-sufficiency. These cutbacks came after a history of challenges faced by Native Americans, wherein necessary support guaranteed in treaties was often delayed, lost, or corruptly mishandled. The legal status of Native nations as 'domestic dependent nations' resulted in many aspects of tribal life being administered by the federal government. However, the mismanagement of services and funds promised to Native peoples led to hundreds of civil cases being filed against the government. Moreover, the policies of relocation and termination intended to assimilate Native Americans into mainstream society often resulted in low-wage employment and poor living conditions, further exacerbating difficulties on the reservations.

Termination policies, which aimed to end the trust status of Native lands and eliminate federal funding, failed to support the tribes' efforts towards economic development and self-governance. This led to the loss of recognized tribal status and rights for affected groups, a situation that only began to be rectified with restorations starting in the 1970s. Governmental policies during the 1980s and the 1990s further hindered the success and self-determination of Native communities.

Answer:

The Kentucky and Virginia Resolves

Explanation:

The Alien Acts were born after the rumour of an invasion of France, so the American people were “warned” that such a foreign influence would jeopardize the United States.

The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions were signed of 1798 were created as a response to the Alien and Sedition Acts signed on July 6th, 1798. Such resolutions were authored by James Madison and Thomas Jefferson. The spirit of the resolutions was to deplore as unconstitutional the Alien and Sedition Acts given the fact that such acts went against the federal authority and in consequence against the Constitution.

To the north of the Indus Valley were only mountains, while to the west was a sizable desert. These organic defenses contributed to the civilization's ability to repel invaders.

The first known urban culture on the Indian subcontinent is the Indus civilization, often known as the Indus valley civilization or the Harappan civilization.

Although the southern sites may have persisted later into the second millennium BCE, the civilization's nuclear dates appear to be between 250 to 1700 BCE. The Indus civilization was the largest of the three early civilizations in the world.

First discovered in 1921 at Harappa in the Punjab region, the civilisation was later discovered in 1922 at Mohenjo-Daro, close to the Indus River in the Sindh region.

Both locations are in the current Pakistani provinces of Sindh and Punjab. In 1980, Mohenjo-remains daro's were listed as a UNESCO World Heritage site.

In addition to the two big cities of Harappa and Mohenjo-Daro, the Indus civilization is known to have had more than 100 towns and villages, many of which were quite small.

The two cities' extraordinary size suggests political centralization, either in two huge states or in a single great empire with alternate capitals, a practice with precedents in Indian history. The two cities were each maybe once roughly one mile square in total dimensions.

Learn more about Indus Valley civilization, here

https://brainly.com/question/3373105

#SPJ5

Answer:

Each state is allowed a certain number of electors equal to the number of its senators and representatives combined. Political parties submit a slate of electors (electoral college) pledged to vote for the candidate of that party. The candidate who wins the vote in a state wins all that state’s electoral votes, regardless of the popular vote.

The Supreme Court has the power of judicial review; it can interpret the Constitution. In original jurisdiction cases, the Supreme Court hears cases that haven’t been tried by lower courts. Most often the Court hears appeals to previously tried or disputed cases. This is appellate jurisdiction.

Explanation: