What group was revived during the 1910s, speaking out against communists, immigrants, Catholics, Jews, and African-Americans?
A) Nativist
B) Ku Klux Klan
C) Know Nothings
D) Anti-Saloon League
Ku Klux Klan had died out during Reconstruction, but was reestablished in 1915. Throughout the 1920s, they burned crosses, held rallies, and spoke out against all the groups with which they disagreed. Additionally, the Klan was no longer just in the South: it had spread throughout the nation.
How many judges are there in the United States Supreme Court?
A.
5
B.
7
C.
9
D.
11
The enrichment of grain products in the united states was initiated in the
Why was Rhode Island founded?
A) as a place for those seeking cultural diversity
B) as a have. For those who disagreed with Puritan beliefs
C) as an expansion of Puritan Massachusetts
D) as a haven for those who owed the government money
Answer:
B) as a haven for those who disagreed with Puritan beliefs.
Explanation:
Rhode Island was the first place since its foundation, in what is now the United States, which allowed religious freedom. In 1636 Roger Williams, after being expelled from the Massachusetts Bay Colony for his religious beliefs, which were disapproved by the Puritans, established himself at one end of Narragansett Bay. This place was called Providence and was declared a zone of freedom of worship.
In 1637, Anne Hutchinson was banished from Massachusetts for criticizing the local clergy. Anne, along with William Coddington and John Clarke among others, founded the city of Portsmouth on Aquidneck Island.
Also, Quakers began arriving in strong waves during the 1650s and 1660s in search of freedom to practice their religion, while Sephardic Jewish immigrants from Barbados settled in Newport, where the oldest synagogue in the United States was built and it is still in use.
Why is it significant or important that the statue of liberty is a product of both french and american efforts?
Where did most of residents of ancient rome lived in
Royal descent in ghana was hereditary. who succeeded a king upon his death?
In the late 1800’s most states had laws that prevented women from?
In the late 1800s, women were barred from voting, owning property, and faced discrimination in employment and education. This led to the rise of the first wave of feminism, pushing for reforms including the right to vote. It wasn't until the Nineteenth Amendment that women's suffrage was recognized.
Explanation:In the late 1800s, most states had laws that prevented women from owning or controlling property, executing wills, and voting. During this period, the doctrine of coverture was prevalent, meaning that married women were not legally independent of their husbands, could not own property in their own name, nor practice certain legal rights. In addition, women faced significant discrimination in areas such as education, employment, and were paid less than men.
In response to these injustices, the first stage of feminism began in North America. Women reformers introduced social reforms concerning married women's property laws, temperance, and changes to education and employment laws. However, women's suffrage was a crucial right that was still denied. Even as women's rights activists like Hannah Corbin advocated for single, property-holding women's rights to vote, this was not the reality for most women in the United States until the passage of the Nineteenth Amendment.
In the late 1800s, most states had laws that prevented women from voting and owning or controlling property, and they also faced workplace discrimination and had restricted reproductive rights. Reforms gradually began with women's suffrage movements, but widespread discrimination continued well into the twentieth century.
Explanation:Laws Preventing Women's Rights in the Late 1800sIn the late 1800’s, most states had laws that prevented women from engaging in various civil activities. Particularly, women were prohibited from voting and owning or controlling property due to the doctrine of coverture, which implied that a married woman had no legal identity apart from her husband. Women's suffrage movements were met with significant opposition, with detractors arguing that women's 'delicate' nature and domestic responsibilities precluded them from political participation. Despite these challenges, women reformers succeeded in introducing some social reforms but still lacked the political power to effect widespread change.
It wasn't until the early twentieth century with the adoption of the Nineteenth Amendment that women were granted the right to vote. However, discrimination persisted, and women continued to face inequities in education, employment, and other areas. They were often denied the opportunity to hold public office, had limited access to professional careers, and were paid less than men. Reproductive rights were severely restricted, with many states making it illegal to sell contraceptive devices and abortions being largely inaccessible.
Some african nations have maintained close relationships with their former colonial rulers primarily because (1) economic and cultural ties remain strong (2) african leaders are unwilling to tackle problems on their own (3) outside nations do not provide assistance to african nations (4) most africans want to keep their dual citizenship7. in the early days of independence, a major problem for many african nations was a (1) shortage of skilled technical workers (2) scarcity of natural resources (3) lack of water for hydroelectric power (4) reluctance to accept economic aid from the united nations
Rank the three individuals from ancient Greece who you feel most contributed to modern western society. You will cite two pieces of evidence per individual to explain and support your rankings.
Answers the u.s. government supported cuba's president, fulgencio batista, because it believed he would:
How did the French Revolution become more radical than the American Revolution?
Answer:
The answer for this question rely on the facts and the popularity. The French Revolution ended up with Robespierre being decapitated meanwhile The American Revolution end up with Britain recognizing US Independence.
Explanation:
The two revolutions are heavy marks on the French and American history. People consider more radical the French Revolution due to the popularity that reach. American Revolution took more time to get results, meanwhile French only took 5 years.
What is the most logical reason why Native Americans followed Quanah Parker and Isa-Tai?
a) Quanah Parker and Isa-tai promised them extensive land treaties
b) Native Americans feared the government, and thought these men could protect them.
c) Native Americans hoped and believed Quanah Parker and Isa-tai could lead a successful escape.
d) Native Americans were threatened with punishment if they did not follow suit.
Answer:
The answer is the option A.
Explanation:Quanah persuaded other Comanche bands to conform. He soon became known as the principal chief of all Comanche, a position that had never existed. During the next three decades he was the main interpreter of white civilization to his people, encouraging education and agriculture, advocating on behalf of the Comanche, and becoming a successful businessman.
Which answer correctly compares the first medieval merchants to merchants of the High Middle Ages? The first medieval merchants were higher in the social hierarchy, while merchants during the High Middle Ages were members of the lower social class. The first medieval merchants were trusted by the people who bought their goods, while merchants during the High Middle Ages were thought to be dishonest. The first medieval merchants were peddlers who held little status or wealth, while merchants during the High Middle Ages formed guilds and often served in government council positions in their towns. The first medieval merchants traveled long distances to trade goods with people from other lands, while High Middle Ages merchants stayed close to home to establish shops in their own towns.
Supporters of Gandhi would most likely agree... a.) with seeking revenge on British imperialists b.) that India and it’s people prospered under imperialism c.) that imperialistic relationships are beneficial to all parties d.) that India needed to gain its independence from the British rule
Supporters of Gandhi would most likely agreed B) that India needed to gain its independence from the British rule.
What is Independence?Independence serves as the act of gaining freedom by a country from their colonial masters such as the British rule.
Since British is the colonial master at India, people are very much support Gandhi because they wanted to be liberated.
Learn more about Independence at;
https://brainly.com/question/9515546
#SPJ2
Alexander Hamilton’s argument that the government has the power to create a national bank is based on which part of the constitution
west berlin was vulnerable to soviet threats after world war 2
Which idea would Washington Gladden have been most likely to support?
Answer:
Washington Gladden, an American religious and progressive leader pioneer on unionization, oppositor of systems such as racial segregation and unregulated capitalism, who deeply cared about the well being of workers in the U.S. around the 1860s and 1870s, thereby an idea he'd most likely support was minimum wage laws.
Explanation:
Which of the following conflicts had the greatest impact on the drawing of the borders shown on this map?
A: Iran-Iraq War
B: World War I
C: Persian Gulf War
D: Yom Kippur War
Answer:
WWI had the greatest impact on the borders
Explanation:
At the constitutional convention the proposal to create a two-chamber legislature- with representation in both houses based on each state's population- was known as
Vietnam war effect on media
The Vietnam War's extensive media coverage, exemplified by graphic television reporting and significant events like the Tet Offensive and the release of the Pentagon Papers, led to a credibility gap between government reports and the harsh realities of the war, significantly influencing public opinion and perceptions of the U.S. government.
Explanation:Impact of the Vietnam War on Media
The Vietnam War had a profound effect on media, marking it as America's first "living-room war." Television coverage, print media, and the lack of formal censorship enabled graphic portrayals of the conflict's harsh realities to reach the American public, significantly influencing public opinion. The CBS Evening News segment in 1965 featuring the destruction of the South Vietnamese village of Cam Ne is a notable example, showcasing the brutality of war actions and raising awareness of the civilian cost of the conflict. The credibility of the U.S. government's optimistic portrayal of the war began to wane as a result of media coverage, a discrepancy often referred to as the "credibility gap."
Events like the 1968 Tet Offensive played a critical role in shifting public perception. Despite officials' positive claims, the offensive and extensive media coverage, including from influential journalists like Walter Cronkite, laid bare the grim reality and contributed to increased anti-war sentiments. The release of the Pentagon Papers further exposed misinformation and raised international outrage, leading to a more cynical view of U.S. foreign policy and a growing distrust in the government.
Ultimately, the Vietnam War's media coverage led to lasting changes in American politics and society, with increasing numbers of Americans questioning the nation's role in the war and other international affairs. The images of Americans dying, as well as revelations like the My Lai Massacre and Pentagon Papers, had wide and enduring effects on public trust and foreign policy views.
This organization is part of the United Nations and provides funds and advice to developing nations to help eliminate poverty. A) The World Bank B) The European Union C) The East Asian Summit D) The International Monetary Fund
Compare the debates that took place over the american expansionism in the 1840s with those that took place in the 1890s, analyzing the similarities and differences in the debates of the two ears
In the 1840s and 1890s, a series of debates took place in the United States concerning American expansionism. Even though in both eras this American expansionism was supported, it was also opposed in each time period due to different motives.
Regarding the similarities in the debates, the American expansionism’s enthusiasts, in both the 1840s and 1890s, had a number of social, political, and economic reasons to support the expansion. In the 1840s, supporters of expansion argued that it was the Manifest Destiny of the United States to expand until it had acquired all of North America. Similarly, in the 1890s, among the reasons claimed by the pro-expansionists to support the American expansion were the search for new markets, the closing of the frontier and increased nationalism.
In contrast, the American expansionism, in both the 1840s and 1890s, also had Opponents. The 1840s the American expansionism’s Opponents, represented mostly by the northern anti-slavery parties, feared that slavery would spread into the new territories. In the same way, the 1890s, those in opposition to the American expansionism feared that the United States risked hypocrisy by practicing imperialism.
Debates over American expansionism in the 1840s and 1890s had similarities such as economic motivations and ideology but differed in their approach to indigenous peoples and territorial focus. The 1890s marked a shift towards overseas imperialism, while the 1840s focused on continental expansion. Both eras shared a sense of national pride and belief in American exceptionalism.
Comparing Debates on American Expansionism in the 1840s and 1890s
The debates over American expansionism in the 1840s and 1890s had both similarities and notable differences. To what extent was American expansion in the 1890s a continuation of manifest destiny?
Manifest Destiny: In the 1840s, the concept of manifest destiny primarily drove American expansion, justified by a belief in the nation's destiny to expand across the North American continent.Economic Opportunities: Both eras saw expansion driven by economic motivations. In the 1840s, land acquisition was a major factor; by the 1890s, economic interests included new markets for goods and raw materials.Nationalism and Ideology: National pride and a sense of American exceptionalism fueled expansion in both eras, although this took on a more racial and militaristic tone in the 1890s.Indigenous Peoples: Opposition to expansion in both periods often pointed to the negative impact on indigenous populations. However, in the 1840s, this focused more on relocation and settlement, whereas the 1890s involved a more direct imperialistic approach.Territorial Focus: The 1840s focused on westward continental expansion (Texas, California, Oregon), while the 1890s saw overseas expansion (Hawaii, Philippines, Puerto Rico).Political Debates: Debates in the 1840s centered around issues of slavery and state admission, while the 1890s included discussions on imperialism and American roles in global politics.Overall, while the expansion in the 1890s was in part a continuation of manifest destiny, it also marked a significant shift towards imperialism and a global presence.
How was cotton still “king” at the start of World War I?
A. It was grown by most southerners.
B. Those who had accumulated wealth in cotton before the Civil War still held it.
C. Cotton production supported the leading industry.
D. The ideas of the antebellum cotton plantation were still strong
The correct answer is B) Those who had accumulated wealth in cotton before the Civil War still held it.
Cotton was still “king” at the start of World War I in that those who had accumulated wealth in cotton before the Civil War still held it.
Cotton was the most profitable cash crop in the Southern plantations. Wealthy landlords benefited so much from growing cotton and made millions of dollars trading it in the United States and exporting it to Europe. Even at the beginning of World War 1, cotton still represented a profitable business.
Answer:
Those who had accumulated wealth in cotton before the Civil War still held it.
Explanation:
A very challenging job for new presidents is to ______. question 25 options:
a.prepare their first executive budget
b.move into the white house
c.prepare and deliver their first state of the union address
d.nominate and gain confirmation for their cabinet and hundreds of other officials
A very challenging job for new presidents is to nominate and gain confirmation for their cabinet and hundreds of other officials. They must swiftly assemble their administration and set priorities for their term under the constraints of existing budget proposals and potentially unanticipated events.
Explanation:A Challenging Job for New PresidentsA very challenging job for new presidents is to nominate and gain confirmation for their cabinet and hundreds of other officials. Upon election, the president-elect must act promptly to assemble an administration, including naming a cabinet that advises and collaborates on setting the nation's policies. Transitioning to power involves various activities such as organizing to govern, forging an agenda, and preparing to deliver on campaign promises.
During the transitional period, the president must face the constraints of the outgoing president's budget proposal while prioritizing initiatives to tackle during the first year in office. Unanticipated events can also influence the presidential agenda, requiring a swift and effective response. Additionally, the assembly of a diverse and capable cabinet reflects the nation's demographic composition and political balance, which can be a complex and drawn-out process requiring Senate confirmation.
It is vital for the new chief executive to quickly establish a political agenda and utilize the honeymoon period of public and media goodwill, especially with a politically aligned Congress. The president must capitalize on this early momentum, given the high public expectations set during the campaign, to advance policy goals before the political winds shift.
Learn more about Presidential Transition here:https://brainly.com/question/19223313
#SPJ6
What was Maryland Eastern Shore during slavery?
Queen elizabeth ii is the head of state in the north american country of _____.
Queen Elizabeth II served as the head of state for Canada, a constitutional monarchy. Her role was mainly as a figurehead with a representative Governor General in Canada. Despite her passing in September 2022, she played a significant symbolic role in the Canadian government during her reign.
The North American country where Queen Elizabeth II served as head of state is Canada. Canada is a constitutional monarchy, and while the British monarch's role is largely symbolic, the Queen was the official head of state. Queen Elizabeth II appointed a Governor General to act as her representative in Canada. The Governor General performs ceremonial duties and functions as the Queen's delegate, showcasing the historical ties between Canada and the United Kingdom. During her time, Queen Elizabeth II opened the 23rd Parliament in the Senate Chamber, Ottawa, Ontario, exemplifying her role in Canadian government functions. The presence of a monarch as a figurehead is designed to provide continuity and stability within the Canadian system of government, which also consists of an elected House of Commons and appointed Senate. Although Queen Elizabeth II passed away in September 2022, during her reign she traveled extensively and carried out her duties as head of state for the 16 countries of the Commonwealth realm, including her significant role within Canada.
where do developing countries obtain outside sources of financing for economic development?
Prior to the start of world war ii, which country was annexed by the germans? apex
According to this law, what would most likely happen to reporters who published negative articles about the Nazi Party?
Answer:
a.) They would be removed from their position.
Explanation:
Section 1Involvement in the shaping of the intellectual contents of the newspapers or political periodicals published in the Reich, whether through writing, news reporting, or illustration. . . is a public function regulated . . . by the state through this law. Persons involved in this way are called editors (Schriftleiter). No one may call himself an editor who is not entitled to do so according to this law. . . . Section 35The Reich Minister for Public Enlightenment and Propaganda may decree the removal of an editor . . . if he deems it necessary for pressing reasons of public welfare.
Background information: In October 1933, the Reich passed an Editorial Law.
According to this law, what was likely to happen to people who published negative articles about the Nazi Party?
a.) They would be removed from their position.
b.) They would be appointed to the position of editor.
c.) They would be elected as Reich Minister for Public Enlightenment.
d.) They would be labeled a Schriftleiter.