Answer:
d. rocking chairs will be overcosted.
Explanation:
Since in the given situation, if the company automates the production of straight-back chairs so the direct hours of straight back chairs will be decreased and the rocking chairs would remain constant and we assume that overall overhead remain the same
In addition, Overall Direct working hours would minimize the proportion of Direct rocking chair working hours in total direct working hours. As a result, the overhead allocation to the Rocking chair would also increase on the basis of Direct Labor hours than before. And it would overcoat the rocking chairs.
Hence, the correct option is d.
Automating the production of straight-back chairs at Wood Company and continuing to use direct labor hours as a companywide allocation basis will result in the overcosting of rocking chairs. The correct option is d.
Explanation:If the Wood Company automates the production of straight-back chairs and continues to use direct labor hours as a companywide allocation basis, the most likely impact would be to overcost the rocking chairs.
This is so because by automating the production of straight-back chairs, the direct labor hours for these chairs will decrease drastically, whereas the direct labor hours for the handmade rocking chairs remain the same.
As a result, a larger portion of the overheads based on direct labor hours will be assigned to the rocking chairs, making them appear more costly than they actually are. Hence, option 'd. rocking chairs will be overcosted' is the correct one. The correct option is d.
Learn more about Allocation here:https://brainly.com/question/34052412
#SPJ11
Calculate the values for each of the questions. Assume that in each country there are no taxes, international trade, or inflation and that interest rates are fixed. The Italian government decides to stimulate the economy by sending checks worth $70 billion to Italian consumers. If the government spending multiplier is 1.5 , calculate the MPC to determine the final change in Italy's real GDP due to the transfer. Please give your answer as a whole number in billions of dollars. $ billion The Greek government decides to introduce new austerity measures, which reduce government direct spending by $16 billion. Greece has a marginal propensity to consume of 0.6 . What will be the final change in real GDP as a result of this decreased spending
Answer:
The answer is:
For italy: $35 billion
For Greece: -$40 billion
Explanation:
Injection into the economy = $70 billion.
Government spending multiplier is 1.5.
MPC = $70billion x 1.5
=$105 billion.
Change in Italy's real GDP due to the transfer = $105 billion - $70 billion
= $35 billion.
Greek Government.
Multiplier effect = 1 ÷ (1-MPC)
1 ÷ (1-0.6)
1÷ 0.4
-2.5.
It is negative because it is a reduction in government spending.
Therefore, the final change in real GDP as a result of this decreased spending is
-2.5 x $16 billion
= -$40 billion
Kenny, Inc., is looking at setting up a new manufacturing plant in South Park. The company bought some land six years ago for $8.9 million in anticipation of using it as a warehouse and distribution site, but the company has since decided to rent facilities elsewhere. The land would net $11.7 million if it were sold today. The company now wants to build its new manufacturing plant on this land; the plant will cost $22.9 million to build, and the site requires $1,040,000 worth of grading before it is suitable for construction. Required: What is the proper cash flow amount to use as the initial investment in fixed assets when evaluating this project? (Do not round intermediate calculations. Enter your answer in dollars, not millions of dollars (e.g., 1,234,567).)
Answer:
The proper cash flow amount to use as the initial investment in fixed assets when evaluating this project is $35,640,000.
Explanation:
Cash flow = Opportunity costs + cost + upgrdation
= $11.7 million + $22.9 million + $1,040,000
= $35,640,000
Therefore, The proper cash flow amount to use as the initial investment in fixed assets when evaluating this project is $35,640,000.
When Padgett Properties LLC was formed, Nova contributed land (value of $340,500 and basis of $85,125) and $170,250 cash, and Oscar contributed cash of $510,750. Both partners received a 50% interest in partnership profits and capital. a. How is the land recorded for § 704(b) book capital account purposes? For § 704(b) book capital account purposes, Padgett records the land at $ . b. What is Padgett's tax basis in the land? $ c. If Padgett sells the land several years later for $510,750, how much tax gain will Nova and Oscar report? Nova reports a $ gain and Oscar's gain is $ .
Answer:
See the explanation below:
Explanation:
a. How is the land recorded for § 704(b) book capital account purposes? For § 704
Debit cash with $170,250
Debit land with $340,500
Credit Nova's Capital account with $510,750
b. What is Padgett's tax basis in the land?
Padgett's tax basis in the land is $85,125 that is carried over.
c. If Padgett sells the land several years later for $510,750, how much tax gain will Nova and Oscar report?
Built in gain = $340,500 - $85,125 = $255,375
Gain from sale = $510,750 - $340,500 = $170,250
Share of gain from sale = $170,250 * 50% = $85,125
Gain to report by Nova = Built in gain + Share of gain from sale = $255,375 + $85,125 = $340,500
Gain to report by Oscar = Share of gain from sale = $170,250 * 50% = $85,125
Swifty Industries had sales in 2016 of $7,520,000 and gross profit of $1,261,000. Management is considering two alternative budget plans to increase its gross profit in 2017. Plan A would increase the selling price per unit from $8.00 to $8.40. Sales volume would decrease by 10% from its 2016 level. Plan B would decrease the selling price per unit by $0.50. The marketing department expects that the sales volume would increase by 115,000 units. At the end of 2016, Swifty has 45,000 units of inventory on hand. If Plan A is accepted, the 2017 ending inventory should be equal to 5% of the 2017 sales. If Plan B is accepted, the ending inventory should be equal to 66,000 units. Each unit produced will cost $1.80 in direct labor, $1.40 in direct materials, and $1.20 in variable overhead. The fixed overhead for 2017 should be $1,553,000.
1. Prepare a sales budget for 2017 under each plan.
2. Prepare a production budget for 2017 under each plan.
3. Compute the production cost per unit under each plan.
4. Compute the gross profit under each plan.
5. Which plan should be accepted?
Answer:Kindly check explanation
Explanation:
2016 volume = 7520000 ÷ 8 = 940,000
Plan A volume = 940,000 - (0.1×940000) = 846000
Plan A selling price = $8.40
Plan B selling price = $(8 - 0.5) = $7.5
Plan B volume = $940,000 + 115,000 = 1,055,000
SALES BUDGET ;
—-------------------------- Plan A. PlanB
Expected unit sale-846,000; 1055000
Unit selling price - $8.40. ; $7.50
Total sales - $7,106,400; $7,912,500
PRODUCTION BUDGET ;
------------------------------- PlanA. PlanB
Expected unit sales- 846000. 1055000
Add:
ending inventory - 42,300. 66,000
Total required unit - 888300. 1,121,000
Less:
Beg. finished goods - 45000. 45000
Tot. required goods - 843,300. 1,076,000
C.
Variable cost = $(1.80+1.40+1.20) = $4.40
Variable cost(PlanA) = $4.40 × 843300 = $3,710,520
Variable cost(PlanB) = $4.40 × 1076000 = $4,734,400
--------------------------------- PlanA. PlanB
Variable cost 3,710,520. 4,734,400
Fixed cost 1553000. 1553000
Total cost(c) 5,263,520. 6,287,400
Total unit(u). 843,300. 1,076,000
Unit cost (c/u) $6.24. $5.84
D.) GROSS PROFIT
Cost of goods sold(PlanA) = $6.24 × 846000 = $5,279,040
Cost of goods sold(PlanB) = $5.84 × 1055000 = $6,161,200
--------------------------------- PlanA. PlanB
SALES. $7,106,400 $7,912,500
Cost of goods sold. $5,279,040. $6,161,200
Gross profit. $1,827,360 $1,751,300
E.) Plan A should be accepted due to it's higher gross profit margin
Bledsoe Company received $28,000 cash from the issue of stock on January 1, 2013. During 2013 Bledsoe earned $9,800 of revenue on account. The company collected $8,600 cash from accounts receivable and paid $6,700 cash for operating expenses. Based on this information alone, during 2013.
o Total assets increased by $39,700.
o Total assets increased by $1,900.
o Total assets increased by $31,100.
o Total assets did not change.
Answer:
During 2013:
Total assets increased by $31,100.
Explanation:
Bledsoe Company received $28,000 cash from the issue of stock on January 1, 2013. Total assets increased by $28,000
Bledsoe earned $9,800 of revenue on account. Account receivable increased by $9,800. Total assets increased by $9,800
The company collected $8,600 cash from accounts receivable. Cash account increased by $8,600 and Account receivable decreased by $8,600. Total assets did not change.
The company paid $6,700 cash for operating expenses. Cash account decreased by $6,700. Total assets decreased by $6,700
During 2013:
Total assets increased = $28,000 + $9,800 - $6,700 = $31,100
Based on the provided information, during 2013, the total assets increased by $1,900. So, the correct option is B.
To determine the change in total assets, we can analyze the impact of various financial transactions. Bledsoe Company received $28,000 cash from the issuance of stock, which is considered an inflow of assets, increasing the total assets by $28,000.
Next, the company earned $9,800 of revenue on account, indicating an increase in accounts receivable (an asset) by $9,800. When the company collected $8,600 cash from accounts receivable, this increased the cash account by $8,600 but reduced accounts receivable by the same amount. Therefore, there was no net change in total assets from this transaction.
Finally, the company paid $6,700 cash for operating expenses, which decreased the cash account by $6,700. However, since this is an expense and not an asset, it does not directly impact the total assets.
Adding up the changes, $28,000 (issuance of stock) - $6,700 (operating expenses) = $21,300, and $21,300 + $9,800 (revenue) - $8,600 (collection of accounts receivable) = $1,900. Therefore, the total assets increased by $1,900 during 2013.
For more questions on total assets
https://brainly.com/question/36995575
#SPJ3
At year-end (December 31), Chan Company estimates its bad debts as 0.40% of its annual credit sales of $882,000. Chan records its Bad Debts Expense for that estimate. On the following February 1, Chan decides that the $441 account of P. Park is uncollectible and writes it off as a bad debt. On June 5, Park unexpectedly pays the amount previously written off.
Prepare the journal entries for these transactions.
1. Record the estimated bad debts expense.
2. Record the entry to write off P. Park's account as uncollectible.
3. Record the reinstatement of Park's previously written off account.
4. Record the cash received on account.
Answer:
1. Debit Bad debt expense $3528
Credit Allowance for doubtful debt $3528
Being entries to record bad debt estimates.
2. Debit Allowance for doubtful debt $441
Credit Accounts receivable $441
Being entries to record receivables gone bad.
3. Debit Accounts receivable $441
Credit Allowance for doubtful debt $441
Being entries to reinstate receivables written off.
4. Debit Cash account $441
Credit Bad debt expense $441
Being entries to record amount received on accounts
Explanation:
When a company makes sales on account, debit accounts receivable and credit sales. Based on assessment, some or all of the receivables may be uncollectible.
To account for this, debit bad debit expense and credit allowance for doubtful debt. Should the debt become uncollectible (i.e go bad), debit allowance for doubtful debt and credit accounts receivable.
Where a debit that had previously been determined to have gone bad gets settled, debit cash and credit bad debt expense.
Amount of bad debt estimates
= 0.4% * $882,000
= $3528
The mars climate orbiter crashed on the surface of mars becausea. one program output thrust in terms of foot-pounds, and another program expected thrust to be expressed in terms of newtons.b. the probe lost contact with the jet propulsion laboratory when it entered the martian atmosphere.c. before programmers went on strike at subcontractor lockheed martin, one of them sabotaged the flight control software.d. a bug in the computer program caused the vehicle to consume too much fuel on the way to mars, leaving an inadequate supply for landing.e. the extreme cold of deep space caused the computer to crash.
Answer:
The correct answer is A. The Mars Climate Orbiter crashed on the surface of Mars because one program output thrust in terms of foot-pounds, and another program expected thrust to be expressed in terms of newtons.
Explanation:
The Mars Climate Orbiter was NASA’s unsuccessful mission to study the Martian climate, part of the Mars Surveyor 98 program. The MCO was created as a satellite-translator for the Mars Polar Lander lander, and after the latter ceased to function, it was supposed to study the Martian climate.
The Mars Climate Orbiter was destroyed when a navigation error caused the probe to be improperly elevated as it entered orbit. The vehicle was destroyed by the friction and stresses in Mars' atmosphere. An investigation showed that some data for the rocket system were calculated in English units (pound-force-second) while the navigation team expected SI units (Newton-second).
The reason the Mars Climate Orbiter crashed was that a. one program output thrust in terms of foot-pounds, and another program expected thrust to be expressed in terms of newtons.
The Mars Climate Orbiter:
Was expected to study the climate of Mars to gain more insight on the planet Crashed when there was a problem with the thrustersThe reason the problem develop was because there was a mismatch in the mass expectation when one program measured mass in foot-pounds and the other in newtons.
In conclusion, option A is correct.
Find out more about the Mars probes at https://brainly.com/question/13340495.
Riverside Manufacturing designs and manufactures bathtubs for home and commercial applications. Riverside recorded the following data for its commercial bathtub production line during the month of March: Standard DL hours per tub 5 Standard variable overhead rate per DL hour $ 4.00 Standard variable overhead cost per unit $ 20.00 Actual variable overhead costs $ 18 comma 500 Actual DL hours 3 comma 700 Actual variable overhead cost per machine hour $ 5.00 Actual tubs produced 1 comma 200 What is the variable manufacturing overhead efficiency variance in March?
Answer:
The variable manufacturing overhead efficiency variance is 9,000 Favorable.
Explanation:
According to the given data we have the following:
actual DL hours=3,700
standard hours= Actual tubs produced×Standard DL hours per tub
standard hours=1,200×5=6,000
standard rate=$4
Therefore, to calculate the variable manufacturing overhead efficiency variance, we would have to use the following formula:
Variable efficiency variance= (actual hrs - standard hrs)*standard rate
Variable efficiency variance= (3,700 - 6,000)*4
Variable efficiency variance=-$9,000 Favorable
The TimpRiders LP has operated a motorcycle dealership for a number of years. Lance is the limited partner, Francesca is the general partner, and they share capital and profits equally. Francesca works full-time managing the partnership. Both the partnership and the partners report on a calendar-year basis. At the start of the current year, Lance and Francesca had bases of $10,000 and $3,000, respectively, and the partnership did not carry any debt. During the current year, the partnership reported the following results from operations:
Net sales $ 650,000
Cost of goods sold $ 500,000
Operating expenses $ 160,000
Short-term capital loss $ 2,000
Tax-exempt interest $ 2,000
§1231 gain $ 6,000
On the last day of the year, the partnership distributed $3,000 each to Lance and Francesca.
Using the information provided, prepare TimpRiders’ page 1 and Schedule K to be included with its Form 1065 for the current year. Also, prepare a Schedule K-1 for Lance and Francesca.
Answer:
See the explanation for the answer.
Explanation:
Form 1065:Sales = $ 650,000
Less:
Operating expenses = $ 160,000
Ordinary income = $10,000
Francesca's Schedule 11231 gains = $3000
Tax exempt int = $1,000
Ordinary income = $5,000
Net income = $2,000
Lance's Schedule 11231 gains = $3000
Tax exempt int = $1,000
Short-term loss $ 1,000
Net income = $3,000
Schedule K-1 is a schedule of IRS Form 1065, which helps in providing information about partner's share, profits and losses, and credits to the IRS.
IRS Form 1065The question demands that the following information should be used to prepare Form 1065, and Schedule K-1 for Lance and Francesca. So here are the answers:
Form 1065
Total Revenue/Net Sales = $ 650,000
Less:
Operating expenses = $ 160,000
Ordinary income = $10,000
Schedule K-1 for Lance
1231 gains = 6000/2 = $3000
Tax exempt int = 2000/2 = $1,000
Short-term loss = 2000/2 = $ 1,000
Net Income = $3,000
Schedule K-1 for Francesca
1231 gains = $3000
Tax exempt interest = $1,000
Ordinary income = $5,000
Net Income = $2,000
Learn more about IRS Form 1065 here:
https://brainly.com/question/6822379
This year William provided $4,200 of services to a large client on credit. Unfortunately, this client has recently encountered financial difficulties and has been unable to pay William for the services. Moreover, William does not expect to collect for his services. William has "written off" the account and would like to claim a deduction for tax purposes.a. What amount of deduction for bad debt expense can William claim this year if he uses the accrual method?b. What amount of deduction for bad debt expense can William claim this year if he uses the cash method?
Answer:
a. $,4,200
b. $0
Explanation:
a. What amount of deduction for bad debt expense can William claim this year if he uses the accrual method?
Account receivable that is partially or totally uncollectible can be claimed under accrual method since income and losses are recognized when earned or uncured.
Since there is no expectation that William will collect for his services which he has written its account receivable off, the full amount of $4,200 which he has included in the income is allowed to deducted by him under accrual method.
b. What amount of deduction for bad debt expense can William claim this year if he uses the cash method?
No amount of bad debt can be claimed under cash method since William has not recognized the income for his services in the income.
Therefore, $0 will be claimed.
Greener Pastures Corporation borrowed $1,800,000 on November 1, 2015. The note carried a 8 percent interest rate with the principal and interest payable on June 1, 2016. (a) The note issued on November 1. (b) The interest accrual on December 31. 1. Indicate the effects of the amounts for the above transactions. (Enter any decreases to account balances with a minus sign. Do not round intermediate calculations.)
Answer:
Dr cash $1,800,000
Cr Notes payable $1,800,000
Interest accrual:
Dr Interest expense $24,000
Cr Interest payable $24,000
Assets =liabilities + shareholders'equity
+Cash $1,800,000 =+loan $1800,000
=+liabilities $24,000 + -retained earnings $2400
Explanation:
The issue of notes payable on November 1 2015 implies that there is cash inflow of $1,800,000 while current liabilities also increased by $1,800,000,as result cash is debited with the $1,800,000 and credit is posted notes payable.
On 31st December ,interest of two months would been incurred and should be accrued in the accounts with amount below:
$1,800,000*8%*2/12=$24,000
This should be debited to interest expense and credited to interest payable account
(a) On Nov 1
Cash
To Note Payable
(Being the note issued is recorded)
(b) On Dec 31
Interest expense $24,000 (8% of $1,800,000 × 2 ÷ 12)
To Interest payable $24,000
(Being interest expense is recorded)
Now the impacts are as follows:Assets = Liabilities + Equity
+ Cash + Note payable ($1,800,000)
($1,800,000) + Interest payable ($24,000) - Interest expense ($24,000)
Learn more: brainly.com/question/20934155
Quick-as-Lightning, a delivery service, purchased a new delivery truck for $40,000 on January 1, 2019. The truck is expected to have a useful life of ten years or 150,000 miles and an expected residual value of $3,000. The truck was driven 15,000 miles in 2019 and 13,400 miles in 2020.
1. Calculate the depreciation expense for 2019 and for 2020 under the straight-line method.
2. Calculate the depreciation expense for 2019 and for 2020 under the double-declining balance method.
3. Calculate the depreciation expense for 2021 under the double-declining balance method.
Answer:
1. $3,700
2. $8,000 and $6,400
3. $5,120
Explanation:
The computation of the depreciation expense for the years are shown below:
1) Straight-line method:
= (Original cost - residual value) ÷ (useful life)
= ($40,000 - $3,000) ÷ (10 years)
= ($37,000) ÷ (10 years)
= $3,700
In this method, the depreciation is same for all the remaining useful life
So for year 2019 and 2020 the same depreciation expense i.e $3,700 is charged separately for each year
(2) Double-declining balance method:
First we have to find the depreciation rate which is given below:
= One ÷ useful life
= 1 ÷ 10
= 10%
Now the rate is double So, 20%
In year 2019, the original cost is 40,000, so the depreciation is $8,000 after applying the 20% depreciation rate
And, in year 2020, the depreciation is
= ($40,000 - $8,000) × 20%
= $6,400
3) For 2021, it would be
= ($40,000 - $8,000 - $6,400) × 20%
= $5,120
Basically we applied the above formulas
An oil company has agreed to buy oil from Russia at 1,800 Rubles per barrel. Have it shipped to Amsterdam by a Norwegian shipping line for 20 Kroner per barrel. The oil will be refined in Rotterdam for 20 Euros per barrel. Finally, a Philippine shipping line will bring gasoline to Miami for 200 Philippine pesos per barrel. What is the landed cost in dollars of this four-part transaction
Answer:
Landing cost = 56.49 dollars per barrel.
Explanation:
Buying Cost of oil barrel = 1,800 Rubles, which is equal to 27.50 USD per barrel.
Shipping Cost = 20 Krones, which is equal to 2.35 USD per barrel.
Refining Cost = 20 Euros, which is equal to 22.82 USD per barrel.
Transportation Cost = 200 Philippine peso, which is equal to 3.82 USD per barrel.
Therefore, to find landing cost of the above mentioned transaction = 27.50 + 2.35 + 22.82 + 3.82 = 56.49 USD per barrel.
Southeastern Bell stocks a certain switch connector at its central warehouse for supplying field service offices. The yearly demand for these connectors is 15 comma 000 units. Southeastern estimates its annual holding cost for this item to be $25.00 per unit. The cost to place and process an order from the supplier is $75.00. The company operates 300 days per year, and the lead time to receive an order from the supplier is 2 working days. a) What is the economic order quantity? nothing units (round your response to the nearest whole number). b) What are the annual holding costs? $ nothing (round your response to the nearest whole number). c) What are the annual ordering costs? $ nothing (round your response to the nearest whole number). d) What is the reorder point? nothing units (round your response to the nearest whole number).
Answer:
EOQ= 300 units
Annual ordering cost= $3750
Annual holding cost =$3750
Re-order point =100 units
Explanation:
The Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) is the order size that minimizes the balance of ordering cost and holding cost. At the EOQ, the carrying cost is equal to the holding cost.
It is computed using he formulae below
EOQ = √ (2× Co× D)/Ch
EOQ = √ (2× 75× 15,000)/25
EOQ = 300 units
Annual holding cost
= EOQ/2 × holding cost per unit
= 300/2 × $25
=$3750
Annual ordering cost
= Annul demand/EOQ × ordering cost per order
=( 15,000/300)× $75
= $3750
Re-order Point
Maximum consumption × maximum lead time
=( 15,000/300)× 2 = 100 units
The payroll register of Heritage Co. indicates $4,200 of social security withheld and $1,050 of Medicare tax withheld on total salaries of $70,000 for the period. Earnings of $12,000 are subject to state and federal unemployment compensation taxes at the federal rate of 0.8% and the state rate of 5.4%.
Provide the journal entry to record the payroll tax expense for the period. If an amount box does not require an entry, leave it blank.
a. Payroll Tax Expense
b. Social Security Tax Payable
c. Medicare Tax Payable
d. State Unemployment Tax Payable e. Federal Unemployment Tax Payable
Answer:
General Journal Debit Credit
Payroll Tax expense $ 5,994
Social Security tax Payable $ 4,200
Medicare Tax Payable $ 1,050
State Unemployment Tax Payable $ 648
Federal Unemployment Tax Payable $ 96
the attached image is additional, well formatted
The payroll tax expense is calculated by adding Social Security tax, Medicare tax, state unemployment tax, and federal unemployment tax. The total tax payable comes to $5,994 which is allocated among the four categories.
Explanation:In order to record the payroll tax expense for the period, we would debit the payroll tax expense for the total amount of taxes withheld. This includes Social Security, Medicare, state unemployment tax, and federal unemployment tax.
The detailed calculation of the taxes are as follows:
Social Security Tax Payable: Already provided as $4,200
Medicare Tax Payable: Already provided as $1,050
State Unemployment Tax Payable: Calculated as $12,000 * 5.4% = $648
Federal Unemployment Tax Payable: Calculated as $12,000 * 0.8% = $96
So the journal entry to record the payroll tax expense is:
Payroll Tax Expense $5,994
Social Security Tax Payable $4,200
Medicare Tax Payable $1,050
State Unemployment Tax Payable $648
Federal Unemployment Tax Payable $96
Learn more about Payroll Tax Expense here:https://brainly.com/question/33095719
#SPJ3
A company's common stock shares are expected to bring a 13 % return to their investors in case of "recession" state of the economy, 6 % return in case of "normal" state of the economy, and result in a 4 % loss in case of "boom" state of the economy. The probability of "boom" is 5 % and the probability of "recession" is 45 %. Calculate the expected rate of return on this company's common stock.
Answer:
The expected rate of return is 8.65%
Explanation:
The expected return on a stock can be calculated by multiplying the return in each scenario by the probability of that scenario. This will provide the expected value of the return based on all these scenarios. Thus, the rate of return is,
Rate of return = rA * pA + rB * pB + rC * pC
Where,
r represents the return in each scenariop represents the probability of each scenarioThe probability of normal state is = 1 - 0.45 - 0.05 = 0.5
Rate of return = 0.13 * 0.45 + 0.06 * 0.5 + (-0.04) * 0.05
Rate of return = 0.0865 or 8.65%
Residual income is the:A. difference between the net sales that the analyst expects the firm to generate and the required earnings of the firm. B. difference between the net income that the analyst expects the firm to generate and the required earnings of the firm. C. difference between the common stock that the analyst expects the firm to issue and the required earnings of the firm. D. difference between the expenses that the analyst expects the firm to generate and the required earnings of the firm.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "D": difference between the expenses that the analyst expects the firm to generate and the required earnings of the firm.
Explanation:
Residual income represents the amount that is left after a company has paid all its capital costs. It is the result of acquiring assets to generate steady revenue over time. Real state, bonds, or stocks are examples of corporate and individual residual income.
Therefore, we could say that residual income is calculated by subtracting the expenses of a firm from its expected earnings out of different sources.
You are considering upgrading from your current inkjet printer to a laser printer. Your old printer cost $350. The new printer costs $600. Print cartridges for the old printer cost $80 each, and print cartridges for the new printer cost $120 each. Cartridges for both printers last for approximately 500 sheets of printing. Your roommate has offered to purchase your old printer for $50. Which cost is a sunk cost
Answer:
$300 i.e irrecoverable cost of old printer
Explanation:
Sunk costs refer to those costs incurred in the past which can no longer be recovered. Such costs are considered as irrelevant in decision making process since they have no current or future implications.
For example, research and development costs incurred by an enterprise in the past represent sunk costs since those costs can no longer be recovered and secondly have no current or future implications w.r.t investment decisions.
In the given case, the cost incurred in purchase of old printer is a sunk cost, incurred in the past. The irrecoverable part of the said cost i.e $350 less $50 i.e $300 represents sunk cost. Also, the expenditure on old printer's cartridges which costed $80 apiece would be regarded as a sunk cost.
This cost of $300 cannot be recovered and would be considered irrelevant w.r.t the decision of purchasing a new advanced printer.
A product normally sells for $200 per unit. A special price of $180 is offered for the export market. The variable production cost is $160 per unit. An additional export tariff of 10% of revenue must be paid for all export products. What is incremental net income per unit from accepting this special order?
Answer:
Effect on income= $2 increase per unit
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
A special price of $180 is offered for the export market. The variable production cost is $160 per unit. An additional export tariff of 10% of revenue must be paid for all export products.
We need to calculate the effect on income using the following formula:
Effect on income= sales - unitary variable costs
Effect on income= 180 - (160 + 180*0.1)= $2 increase per unit
On January 1, 2021, the Shagri Company began construction on a new manufacturing facility for its own use. The building was completed in 2022. The only interest-bearing debt the company had outstanding during 2021 was long-term bonds with a book value of $11,100,000 and an interest rate of 9%. Construction expenditures incurred during 2021 were as follows:
January 1 $500,000
March 1 600,000
July 31 480,000
September 30 600,000
December 31 300,000
Required:
Calculate the amount of interest capitalized for 2016.
Answer:
$1,120,500
Explanation:
January 1 $500,000*12/12*9%=$45,000
March 1 $600,000*10/12*9%=$45,000
July 31 $480,000*5/12*9%=$18,000
September 30 $600,000*3/12*9%=$13,500
December 31 $300,000*0/12=0
Interest on Bonds Outstanding $11,100,000*9%=$999,000
Total Interest to be capitalized=$1,120,500
financial calculator Bruno's Lunch Counter is expanding and expects operating cash flows of $23,900 a year for 5 years as a result. This expansion requires $66,000 in new fixed assets. These assets will be worthless at the end of the project. In addition, the project requires $5,600 of net working capital throughout the life of the project. What is the net present value of this expansion project at a required rate of return of 12 percent?
Final answer:
The net present value of Bruno's Lunch Counter's expansion project is calculated by finding the present value of expected operating cash flows, and then subtracting the required fixed asset investment and the net working capital. The discount rate used for the present value calculation is 12 percent, and the cash flows are expected to occur annually over a period of 5 years.
Explanation:
The question asks for the net present value (NPV) of an expansion project for Bruno's Lunch Counter, which requires calculating the present value of future operating cash flows and adjusting for the initial investment costs and the working capital required throughout the project. We will follow these steps:
Calculate the present value of the annual operating cash flows.Subtract the initial fixed asset investment and the net working capital requirement.Sum these values to find the NPV at the required rate of return of 12 percent.The NPV formula we will apply is NPV = Σ (Ct / (1 + r)^t) - I - W, where Ct represents the cash flows in each period t, r is the discount rate (12%), I is the initial fixed asset investment, and W is the net working capital requirement.
Assuming that the operating cash flows occur at the end of each year for 5 years, and that the initial investment and working capital are required at the start, we use the present value formula for an annuity to compute the present value of the operating cash flows and then subtract the costs of investment and working capital to reach our final NPV.
On October 5, Cullumber Company buys merchandise on account from Marin Company. The selling price of the goods is $6,650, and the cost to Marin Company is $3,010. On October 8, Cullumber returns defective goods with a selling price of $840 and a scrap value of $430. Record the transactions on the books of Marin Company, assuming a perpetual approach.
Answer:
October 5 entries
Debit Accounts receivable $6,650
Credit Sales Revenue $6,650
To record sales
Debit Cost of goods sold $3,010
Credit Inventory $3,010
To record the cost of sales
October 8 entries
Debit Sales return $840
Credit Accounts receivable $840
To record sales reversal due to sales return
Debit Inventory $430
Credit Cost of goods sold $430
Explanation:
The perpetual inventory system is the one that ensures that the book balance for inventory is adjusted for every purchase, sale or return of inventory.
When inventory is sold on account, the entries required are debit accounts receivable and credit revenue then Debit cost of goods sold and credit inventory.
Mazie Supply Co. uses the percent of accounts receivable method. On December 31, it has outstanding accounts receivable of $63,500, and it estimates that 6% will be uncollectible. Prepare the year-end adjusting entry to record bad debts expense under the assumption that the Allowance for Doubtful Accounts has: (a) a $1,080 credit balance before the adjustment. (b) a $318 debit balance before the adjustment.
Answer:
The journal entries are as follows:
(a) A $1,080 credit balance before the adjustment.
Bad Debt Expense A/c Dr. $2,730
To Allowance for Doubtful Accounts $2,730
(To record the bad debt expense)
Workings:
The credit balance of allowance for doubtful accounts will be deducted from the uncollectible accounts.
Bad Debt Expense:
= Uncollectible - Credit balance
= (6% × $63,500) - $1,080
= $3,810 - $1,080
= $2,730
(b) A $318 debit balance before the adjustment.
Bad Debt Expense A/c Dr. $4,128
To Allowance for Doubtful Accounts $4,128
(To record the bad debt expense)
Workings:
The debit balance of allowance for doubtful accounts will be added to the uncollectible accounts.
Bad Debt Expense:
= Uncollectible + Debit balance
= (6% × $63,500) + $318
= $3,810 + $318
= $4,128
7. Problems and Applications Q7 Your cousin Vinnie owns a painting company with fixed costs of $200 and the following schedule for variable costs: Quantity Variable Cost Average Fixed Cost Average Variable Cost Average Total Cost (Houses Painted per Month) (Dollars) (Dollars) (Dollars) (Dollars) 1 10 2 20 3 40 4 80 5 160 6 320 7 640 The efficient scale is houses.
Answer:
4 houses per month.
Explanation:
Note: See the attached file for the calculation.
Efficient scale of production is can be described as the number of units of production where average total cost (ATC) of production is lowest.
From the attached file, the ATC of $70 is the lowest at 4 houses per month and 4 houses per month is therefore the efficient scale.
Assume we have a firm's per-day production data: one person can produce 8 units, 2 people can produce 15 units, 3 people can produce 18 units, and 4 people can produce 20 units. If the per-unit price of the good produced is $5 and daily per-person wages are $27, how many people should the firm hire?
Answer:
1 person.
Explanation:
For one person;
Wage =$27
Total Cost of units = 8×5 = $40
Per unit profit = (40-27)/8 = $1.625 per unit
For two people;
Wage =$27 × 2 = $54
Total Cost of units = 15×5 = $75
Per unit profit = (75-54)/15 = $1.4 per unit
For three people;
Wage =$27 × 3 = $81
Total Cost of units = 18×5 = $90
Per unit profit = (90-81)/18 = $0.5 per unit
For four people;
Wage =$27 × 4 = $108
Total Cost of units = 20×5 = $100
Per unit profit = (100-108)/20 = -$0.4 per unit
Therefore, for the four cases the maximum profit per unit is $1.625, with one person. And since there is no production limits (minimum). So, the firm should hire 1 person.
Firms such as IKEA and The Home Depot are known for their use of __________ because they set reasonably low prices but still offer high-quality products and adequate customer services.
Answer:
Value Based pricing.
Explanation:
Value based pricing is something which IKEA and The Home Depot are know for using because this is a way of pricing through which prices are set based on the customer's perception and what he/she thinks of it in his mind. This is also know as customer based/focused pricing because they sell items on prices which customer's believe how exactly it should be.
Thankyou.
Goodluck.
IKEA and The Home Depot employ business strategies that offer high-quality products and customer service at low prices, a principle similar to Walmart's 'everyday low prices.' IKEa uses flat organizational structures to encourage employee engagement, while Amazon's efficient production and cost models allow for competitive pricing.
Stores like IKEA and The Home Depot are known for their successful business strategies which encompass providing high-quality products and adequate customer services while maintaining reasonably low prices. The philosophy behind this approach is akin to the strategy used by Walmart, known as 'everyday low prices.' By targeting a market with elastic demand, these companies find that a slight decrease in prices leads to a significant increase in sales volume, often resulting in overall higher profitability.
IKEA, specifically, employs flat organizational structures within its stores to enhance employee involvement and instill a sense of ownership among its staff. This management strategy contributes to the company's ability to maintain cost-effective operations while fostering a workplace culture that is conducive to delivering value to its customers.
Moreover, companies like Amazon have executed similar principles through efficient production models and cost structures, enabling them to offer lower prices than competitors even when including shipping costs. These business practices highlight the importance of operational excellence in attracting and retaining customers who prioritize cost, convenience, and quality when making purchasing decisions.
The major prediction of the lemons model is that:
a. asymmetric information reduces the average quality of goods offered for sale.
b. a used car in good condition can be sold for a higher-than-average price.
c. people will generally choose "low-hanging fruit".
d. used cars offered for sale are generally in better-than-average condition.
Answer:
A) asymmetric information reduces the average quality of goods offered for sale.
Explanation:
The lemons model or problem refers to investing or purchase related problems due to the fact that investors/buyers have different information about securities/products than the sellers.
Since investors/buyers know that there are lemons (bad products) up for sale, but do not know which of them are actually bad, they will be willing to pay a lower price for high quality investments/goods than if only high quality investments/goods were sold without any lemons mixed with them.
there are a 140 pounds of flour in inventry on october 1. 1400 loaves are to be produced in october and 1500 loaves in november. flour costs $3 per pound and 1/2 pound is used per loaf. with the policy of 20% of next month's needs being in ending inventory, what is the budget for flour purchases in october
Answer:
The budgeted floor purchases for October is 710 pounds and the cost of 710 pounds of flour is $2130
Explanation:
The flour needed to meet the October's production requirement for loaves is,
1400 * 1/2 = 700 pounds
The desired ending inventory of flour in October = 1500 * 1/2 * 0.2 = 150 pounds
The purchases for October should be enough to meet the desired ending inventory for October and the remaining Production requirement for October after adjusting for opening inventory .
Purchases = Closing Inventory + Production - Opening Inventory
Purchases = 150 + 700 - 140 = 710 pounds
The cost of purchases = 710 * 3 = $2130
The planned flour purchases for October are 710 pounds and the cost for total flour is $2130.
Given that,
Opening stock is 140 pounds.Flour cost $3 per pound and 1/2 pound is used per loaf.In October, production are 1400 loaves and in November, production will be 1500 loaves.Safety stock of 20% of next month needs to be maintained.According to the scenario, computation of given data are as follows,
Flour needs for October production = 1,400 loaves [tex]\times[/tex] 1/2 pound
= 700 pounds
Flour needs for 20% of November production = (1,500 loaves [tex]\times[/tex] 1/2 pounds) [tex]\times[/tex] 20%
= 150 pounds
So, total purchase of flour in October will be as follows,
Purchases = 20% Inventory of Nov. + Current month production - Opening stock
By putting the value, we get,
Purchases = 150 Pounds + 700 pounds - 140 Pounds
= 710 pounds
So, cost of 710 pound flour purchases = 710pounds [tex]\times[/tex] $3
= $2,130
Learn more: https://brainly.com/question/12500281
Tano issues bonds with a par value of $180,000 on January 1, 2016. The bonds' annual contract rate is 8%, and interest is paid semiannually on June 30 and December 31. The bonds mature in three years. The annual market rate at the date of issuance is 10%, and the bonds are sold for $170,862. 1. What is the amount of the discount on these bonds at issuance
Answer:
The discount on the bonds issuance is $9,138.00
Explanation:
discount on bonds at issuance=bonds face value-bonds cash proceeds
bonds face value is $180,000
bonds cash proceeds =$170,862
Discount on bonds at issuance=$180,000-$170,862
Discount on bonds at issuance=$9,138.00
The necessary journal entries to record the bonds issuance are follows:
Dr Cash $170,862.00
Dr discount on bonds issue $9,138.00
Cr Bonds payable $180,000
The discount on the bonds would amortized over relevant years
Issuing bonds is termed as the way for companies to raise the funds for the company. It is referred to as the broad function between the investor and the firm or the corporate. The investor agrees to invest some amount of money in the firm with the guarantee to get a fixed interest in return.
The discount on issuance of the bonds is $9,138.00
Discount on bonds at issuance=bonds face value-bonds cash proceeds
bonds face value is $180,000
bonds cash proceeds =$170,862
[tex]\text{Discount on bonds at issuance}=\$180,000-\$170,862[/tex]
Discount on bonds at issuance=$9,138.00
The necessary journal entries to record the issuance of the bonds have been attached below.
To know more about the issue of the bonds, refer to the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/22985933
Fixed manufacturing costs are $44 per unit, and variable manufacturing costs are $100 per unit. Production was 67,200 units, while sales were 50,400 units. Determine (a) whether variable costing operating income is less than or greater than absorption costing operating income, and (b) the difference in variable costing and absorption costing operating income.
Answer:
a. Less
b. $739,200
Explanation:
a. As we know that
Under the variable costing, all the variable cost i.e direct material, direct labor, variable manufacturing overhead are considered
And, under the absorption costing, all the fixed cost and the variable cost are considered i.e direct material, direct labor, variable manufacturing overhead, fixed variable manufacturing overhead, fixed and variable selling and admin expenses are considered
So based on this, the variable costing operating income is less than the absorption costing due to the fixed cost
b. And, the difference amount is
= [67,200 Units – 50,400 Units] × $44 per unit
= 16,800 Units × $44 per unit
= $739,200
Final answer:
Variable costing operating income is typically less than absorption costing operating income when inventory increases, as fixed costs are expensed when incurred in variable costing. The difference in operating income for this scenario would be $739,200, calculated by the fixed cost per unit times unsold units.
Explanation:
Fixed manufacturing costs per unit are $44, and variable manufacturing costs per unit are $100. With a production of 67,200 units and sales of 50,400 units, we need to determine the relationship between variable costing and absorption costing operating income. Under absorption costing, fixed manufacturing costs are allocated to each unit produced, so these costs are expensed as the units are sold. Since not all units produced were sold, some fixed manufacturing costs are included in ending inventory on the balance sheet rather than being expensed on the income statement, which increases operating income compared to variable costing. Under variable costing, only variable manufacturing costs are assigned to the product, and all fixed manufacturing costs are expensed in the period incurred. Therefore, the variable costing operating income is generally less than the absorption costing operating income when inventory levels increase (production is greater than sales), as is the case here. To calculate the difference in operating income between the two costing methods, we multiply the fixed manufacturing cost per unit by the number of units produced but not sold. The difference is $44 times 16,800 units (67,200 units produced - 50,400 units sold), which equals $739,200.