Write in full the meaning of MLA and APA.

​

Answer:

The answer is B (names)

Explanation:

I put colors :( And it was wrong ):

Using your knowledge of the Latin root nomen, you can guess that planetary nomenclature is a system of giving new planets of option B: Names.

The Latin root word is defined as the word that means "name". This root word is generated from the fair number of Vocabulary words, consisting nominee and denominator.

Moreover, the part of speech in nomen in latin is considered as the Noun. There are only one way to find out the Latin root of a word.

Adding to it, in order to find out the root of each word, we need to normally remove the genitive ending (which changes with each declension).

Rest all options like A, C and D are incorrect because they does not include under Latin root nomen.

Therefore, correct option is B.

Learn more about Latin Nomen, refer to the link:

https://brainly.com/question/3807335

#SPJ2

Answer:

Portia and Other Female Characters

Explanation:

Portia is the main female protagonist of the play The Merchant of Venice. She is beautiful like Desdemona and Miranda; gracious and resilient like Cordelia and intelligent and quick-witted like Rosalind. Unlike Juliet, Portia is very tactful in choosing her husband.

Like Viola, Portia disguises herself as a man. She is even smart in assuming the role of an advocate's apprentice and helped save Antonio's life in court.

in argument and intelligence, Portia is better than Regan when she speaks in court. She discovers a technicality in the bond, thereby outwitting the Jewish moneylender Shylock and saving Antonio's life from the pound of flesh demanded.

Final answer:

Portia stands as a celebrated Shakespearean heroine known for wit and integrity, different from Lady Macbeth's ambition and Ophelia's perceived vulnerability, but each character reflects women's agency within their societal constraints.

Explanation:

Portia is one of Shakespeare's most revered characters, often hailed for her wit, intelligence, and moral strength. In 'The Merchant of Venice,' she not only saves Antonio but also teaches a lesson in mercy and justice through her deft disguise as a young male lawyer. Unlike other heroines, she possesses both the softness and headstrong qualities not often seen in one character.

Comparatively, Lady Macbeth, from 'Macbeth,' acts as another strong female character, but she is driven by ambition and power, whereas Portia embodies a sense of fairness and cleverness. Lady Macbeth initially appears as an equal partner in her marriage, encouraging Macbeth's rise to power, showing an atypical agency for a woman in her time. However, her ultimate unraveling contrasts with Portia's consistent strength throughout the play.

Ophelia from 'Hamlet' is often perceived as tragic and weak, with her madness and eventual death reflecting the vulnerability and lack of agency for women at the time. Yet, some critics have argued she exhibits the most control available within her gender constraints, showing a form of heroism in her submissiveness.

Answer:

They respected him. To them, he was an intelligent, morally upright man who represents what a true Christian should be, unaffected by others' opinions.

Explanation:

In Harper Lee's novel "To Kill A Mockingbird", Atticus Finch epitomizes the true personification of what a man should be. He was respected by all, even his own children. He was a lawyer but still unswayed by the opinions of others. He has also been continuously elected in the state legislature, unopposed. This shows just how much respected and truthful he must have been in the community. The cartoon image of Atticus in the newspaper gives the perfect portrait of Atticus, "chained to the desk" with white girls trying to distract him. But he still remained focused only on his work. This shows how devoted he is to his work and a respected person.

But once the case of the black man Tom Robinson sexually assaulting Mayella Ewell, a white girl started, his image changed for the person. He took the role of the lawyer, defending Tom against the false accusation. This made the townspeople question his actions. For them, since Tom was black, he is guilty. The issue of racism is still prevalent during those times so they are still swayed by the popular belief that whatever the issue is involving a colored person, then he's guilty. They started saying things to not only Atticus but even the children. They couldn't understand why he was representing a black man, trying to prove the innocence of a black man in a white majority community.

But after the trial and verdict, the townspeople brought food for them. This is a symbol of showing their respect for the man trying his best to prove the innocence of a man, even though he fails. His work ethics and commitment to the cause of injustice, even if he ends up being hated, shows him as  a person of great character and respect.

Answer:

I think it is D. have the actors share memories of times when they were too trusting

The broadcast's producer makes to present the theme effectively D. Have the actors share memories of times when they were too trusting.

Why is it important to establish a theme and message?

When writing a story, theme should not be overlooked. The theme is fundamental to good storytelling. Theme is especially essential to give your characters and events meaning, a meaning that often leads to great spiritual or emotional involvement and release by an audience. Great themes create great drama.

The idea the writer wishes to convey about the subject—is the writer's view of the world or a revelation about human nature. To identify the theme, be sure that you've first identified the story's plot, the way the story uses characterization, and the primary conflict in the story.

Plot, Setting, Character, Conflict, Symbol, and Point of View are the main elements that fiction writers use to develop a story and its Theme.

To learn more about the theme effectively, refer

https://brainly.com/question/2535475

#SPJ2

Answer:

Subject List and Themes

Explanation:

The subject list is Okonkwo, Unoka, Nyowe, Ilemefuna and Ezinma. The potential themes of Things Fall Apart are: the social disintegration, clash of culture, fate and free will, masculinity, tribal and belief and justice

Things Fall Apart is a story about social disintegration, a culture on the verge of change and how the changing social milieu affect various characters. Clash of culture is well illustrated when modernity tends to influence the traditional belief.

Answer:

It could ruin the whole essence of a camping trip, the experience of camping outside among nature.

Explanation:

The primary purpose of any camping trip might well be to experience nature and be among the woods, enjoying the surroundings and being one with nature. The outside camping, the bonfire, the tents, all are part of the experience. But if it rains, then everything gets ruined. The camping won't be a success, bonfires are impossible, out of the question, and the proposed experience of being one with nature might as well be eliminated. Not only will it ruin the plans, it will also make it impossible to even camp properly, let alone do anything. Staying dry will be the only objective. It could ruin the whole essence of a camping trip, the experience of camping outside among nature.

Answer:

The answer is most likely "withdrawn."

Explanation:

Answer:today's

Explanation:

It honestly makes sense "today's going to be another warm day

The correct answer is Dionysus

Explanation:

In Ancient Greece literature and drama played an important role, due to this, it was in this civilization first theatres were built. One of the most important was the Theatre of Dionysus that was built in honor of the god Dionysus who was linked to harvesting, fertility, and wine. It is believed this theatre was the first one in the Greece Civilization as it was built around the 4th century BC, besides this, the Dyonisus theatre was a major theater in this civilization not only because of its location at the foot of the Athenian Acropolis (center of civilization) but because of its complex structure designed to allow thousands of people to listen and observe at the plays. According to this, the theatre describes is the Theatre of Dionysus.

The Theatre of Dionysus was a significant theater in ancient Greece at the foot of the Athenian Acropolis, exemplifying the integration of natural landscape into theater design and serving as a hub for Dionysian festivals and the birthplace of Greek tragedy and comedy.

The Theatre of Dionysus was a major theatre in ancient Greece, built at the foot of the Athenian Acropolis. Greek theaters like the Theatre of Dionysus were marvels of design, integrating the natural geography of the landscape, such as the use of a hill's slope to create the seating area known as the koilon, and the flat area at the bottom called the orchestra, where the dancers performed and rituals began with a sacrifice. The stage, set behind the orchestra, was initially a simple building with three doors, but evolved into a stone structure known as the skene.

Athens in the Golden Age saw the development of tragedies and comedies, with famed playwrights such as Sophocles and Euripides using traditional myths to explore philosophical questions. These theatrical activities were deeply tied to the cult of Dionysus and were performed during important festivals like the City Dionysia. The theatron, orchestra, skene, and paraskene were all key structural elements of ancient Greek theaters, epitomized by the Theatre of Dionysus, influencing the design of theaters even today.

Answer:

Each person should follow his or her individual passion.

Answer: D. Each Person Follows His Or Her Individual Passion

Hope It Helps ;)

Answer:

Simple and Complex Sentence

Explanation:

A simple sentence contain one independent clause; it doesn't have a dependent clause. For example, I play cricket.

A complex sentence contains an independent clause plus at least one dependent or subordinate clause. For example, The chief explained what the situation was.

The Chief explained (independent clause)

What the situation was (dependent clause)

Answer:

The participle is "weighing" and it modifies "snail".

Explanation:

In the structure "A snail weighing a third of an ounce can pull eight pounds", the subject of the main clause is "a snail". Interrupting the flow of the main clause we have an adjective phrase. Adjective phrases have the same subject as the main clause and, instead of being set off by a relative pronoun, they begin with a participle. In this case, it is a present participle - verb + ing - "weighing". The purpose of the adjective phrase is to modify the noun. "Weighing a third of an ounce" is modifying snail, giving it a characteristic. It's not just any snail, it's a snail that weighs a third of an ounce.

Answer:

In a sentence, WHO and WHOM have different syntactic functions.

Explanation:

WHO

WHOM

To decide between 'who' and 'whom,' use the he/him method: if 'he' fits, use 'who;' if 'him' fits, use 'whom.' 'Who' is for subjects and 'whom' is for objects. This rule is particularly important in formal writing, although it's less noticed in casual speech.

To determine when to use who and when to use whom, you can use the he/him method. If the pronoun can be replaced with 'he,' 'she,' or 'they' (subjective case), then use 'who.' If it can be replaced with 'him,' 'her,' or 'them' (objective case), use 'whom.' For example, in the sentence 'Who/Whom do I consider my best friend?' reorder it to 'I consider him my best friend.' Since 'him' sounds correct, 'whom' should be used: 'Whom do I consider my best friend?'

Using 'who' as the subject of a sentence means it's performing the action, like in 'The students who participate actively retain the information.' When 'whom' is used as the object, it's receiving the action, as in 'The students whom the lab assistant liked the most were the ones who stayed to help clean up.'

In casual conversation, the distinction may not be noticed, but in formal writing, using the correct form is important. The he/him test can help clarify which to use in professional writing where precision matters.

Answer:

Modal auxiliary

Explanation:

 There are several auxliiary verbs (the ones that help to form a tense or an expression), and some of them are modal auxialiaries (may, must, will, etc). Can is one of the auxiliary verbs used for permission , possibility, ability, etc. In the sentence "We can't go against the law, Doroty.", can't is a word that expresses the idea of not having permission, not being allowed.

There are 18 dogs. This is found by letting the number of cats be [tex]x[/tex], the number of dogs [tex]6x[/tex], and solving the equation [tex]x + 6x = 21[/tex].

Given that there are 6 times as many dogs as cats and the total number of dogs and cats is 21, we can set up the following equations:

The total number of dogs and cats is given as 21. Therefore, we can write the equation:

[tex]x + 6x = 21[/tex]

This simplifies to:

[tex]7x = 21[/tex]

Solving for [tex]x[/tex] gives:

[tex]x = 21 / 7 = 3[/tex]

Thus, the number of cats is 3. Therefore, the number of dogs is:

[tex]6 * 3 = 18[/tex]

So, there are 18 dogs.

Answer:

Martin Luther King Jr.

Explanation:

Winner of the Nobel Peace Prize of 1964, Martin Luther King Jr. was a great orator, civil rights activist and a minister in a Baptist church. He is most famously known for his civil rights movements with the use of non violence and civil disobedience, inspired by the works of the great Indian leader Mahatma Gandhi.

Martin Luther King Jr. gained prominence for his oppositional stand against the prejudiced and biased treatment of his people, the blacks, by the whites in America. He began organizing protests and oppositions from 1955 till his ultimate assassination in 1968. He led numerous non violent movements across Alabama first, which then spread to other parts of the nation. On October, 1964, he was selected for the prestigious Nobel Peace Prize which give awards to persons of great influence for the peace in the world. In his acceptance speech, he emphasized the need to maintain a peaceful co-existence at the same time, working towards a better society. But this wasn't the only point he made. He reiterate the fact that even though this award was given for peace, he points the irony in that the movement he's been making/having hasn't been accepted. The movement for peace has been rejected, laving his people still oppressed and without peace in their lives. He emphasized the need for equality of rights for all the citizens of his native country.

Answer:

The name given to this serpent was Apep.

Explanation:

While Ma'at was the light, the truth, or the order, Apep was a serpent god whose purpose was to destroy Ma'at. Every night, Apep would attack the sun god Ra, the upholder of Ma'at. And every night, Apep would be defeated.

Apep was also known as Lord of Chaos and his creation was believed to be a consequence of Ra's creation. Apep would sometimes be described as being born from Ra's umbilical cord. In their battles, Apep's movements were believed to cause earthquakes and even thunderstorms.

The malevolent serpent that threatened Ma'at in Egyptian mythology by attacking the sun each night was known as Apep or Apophis, an embodiment of chaos against Re, the sun god.

The giant serpent that was believed to attack the sun each night in Egyptian mythology and represented a great threat to Ma'at, the balance of life, was named Apep or Apophis. This malevolent serpent was the enemy of the sun god Re, and each night they would engage in a cosmic battle, symbolizing the struggle between order and chaos. The belief maintained by the Ancient Egyptians was that the sun god had to defeat Apep to rise each morning, thereby ensuring the continuation of harmony and balance in the universe.

Answer:

William Blake

Explanation:

 William Blake was an English poet, artist and visionary. He believed that the imagination is the only reality , and that people should look inside themselves to see the Worlds of Thought . He saw in his imagination many real things such as angels. "Songs Of Innocence" are happy poems that children enjoy reading. "Songs of Experience" refers to character, self-awareness, maturity, etc.

The famous 19th century English poet who separated his collections into the 'Songs of Innocence' and the 'Songs of Experience' was William Blake.

The famous 19th century English poet who separated his collections into the 'Songs of Innocence' and the 'Songs of Experience' was William Blake. These collections contain contrasting poems that explore themes of innocence and the loss of innocence, and they are considered some of Blake's most significant works.Later, he expanded this collection with poems addressing the darker side of life, which he called Songs of Experience (1794). His contrast between them represents transitions from joyous and naive innocence to a more enlightened but often painful experience.

https://brainly.com/question/30107663

#SPJ3

Answer:

The characters of Desdemona and Emila are two contrasting women who are together but opposites in their ways.

Explanation:

In William Shakespeare's tragedy play "Othello", Desdemona and Emilia are the only female characters shown. Moreover, they have a lot of lines, which is somehow significant for in Shakespeare's times, women were thought to be lower to men. They constitute the important theme of female gender characterization n the story.

Desdemona is the wife of Othello, a black moor. She loves her husband very much, which is evident in her rebellious decision to marry him despite her father Brabantio's protests. She is shown as a submissive wife, even accepting her own fault for her death. But then, we see her rebellious streak in her decision to go against the wishes of her father in marrying Othello. She acts independent at first but then as the story progresses, she became more and more dependent, unable to even make a stand.

Emilia is the wife of Iago, the villain in the play. She is also the attendant to Desdemona. She at first appears to be a submissive wife, doing whatever was asked of her. She did not question anything that her husband does, even assisting in stealing the handkerchief of her mistress so that her husband will use it in his plan to wrongly accuse Desdemona of infidelity. But when she actually realizes that Othello, through Iago's plan, had killed Desdemona, she began to see the monstrosity of her husband's character. She no longer is the submissive wife. She accuses Iago of the murder and told him that she will tell everyone of his act, even if she's to lost twenty lives. She also chastises Othello when he actually believed the accusations of Iago about Desdemona's infidelity.

Final answer:

Desdemona and Emilia in Shakespeare's Othello represent contrasting depictions of female characters in the Elizabethan era, with varied interpretations of their roles over time. In comparison, Ophelia from Hamlet has been portrayed differently across centuries, reflecting changing views on female madness and agency.

Explanation:

Depiction of Women in Othello

The women in Shakespeare's Othello, Desdemona and Emilia, are depicted with complexity and reflect the gender roles of the Elizabethan era. Desdemona is presented as a figure of innocence and purity, yet she also demonstrates courage and assertiveness in her relationship with Othello. Conversely, Emilia is more worldly and cynical, providing a foil to Desdemona's character. In a broader sense, they both struggle against the limitations placed on them by society.

In the discussion of gender and madness, Ophelia from Hamlet is often contrasted with male characters in terms of how madness is portrayed differently for men and women. Ophelia's madness, often attributed to erotomania, is seen as a symptom of her unrequited love and the oppressive environment that stifles her desires. Over time, performances and interpretations of Ophelia have evolved, sometimes depicting her with greater agency or as a tragic figure of female oppression.

Varying historical periods have brought different lenses to these Shakespearean characters. The 18th-century versions of Ophelia were sanitized and made more dignified, while the 19th-century Romantic period brought back her sexuality and madness. The Victorian era saw a feminist revision of Ophelia's character, aligning her madness with broader themes of sexual intimidation and repressive societal norms.

Answer:

France

Explanation:

After going through some difficult years between 1925 and 1933 and serving in many different Cabinets as minister of public works, public instruction, and war, Edouard Daladier became Prime Minister of France on January 31, 1933, but this government only made it to October of the same year.

Answer:

Nehemiah.

Explanation:

In the book of Nehemiah chapter 1 verse 11, he said that he is ''cupbearer to the king''. Nehemiah had previously been a prisoner of King Artaxerxes when they conquered Jerusalem. But during the 20th year of King Artaxerxes's reign, Nehemiah was made the cup-bearer to the king. Cup- bearers or wine- bearers are those trusted aides of the kings who will take care of the king's drinks, even taste it so to prove that it isn't poisoned.

When he learned of the distress of the remaining Jewish people in Judah, he asked the king for help, to send him to help his people. The King accepted his request, making him Governor of Judah. He provided him with all provisions needed for the trip as well as the rebuilding of the land of Judah for the Jews, even giving authorial letter explaining his support for this venture and the permission to get timber from the King's forest.  Thus, the city of Jerusalem was rebuilt under King Artaxerxes's support through Nehemiah.

Answer:

The answer to the request: In the case below, the original source material is given along with a sample of student work. Determine the type of plagiarism by clicking the appropriate radio button, would be: Paraphrasing plagiarism.

Explanation:

Plagiarism is unfortunately a very common mistake in writers, of any kind. Basically, plagiarism appears when a writer takes the original ideas from another and uses them, either word-for-word, without using the appropriate quotation marks, or simply states the same ideas of the original author, and only adds a few words and ideas of his own. In this case, in the student version, the student uses several literal words from the original text, and does not properly give the credit, and he fills the rest with some of his words. In correct paraphrasing, in order not to committ plagiarism, the credit must still be given and the words used to paraphrase the original idea have to be different in every respect from the original. If certain "concepts" need to be used because they cannot be paraphrased, then quotation marks need to be used and in-text citation must be properly done, aside from the credit given on the reference page.

Answer:

The correct answer is "This is not plagiarism".

Explanation:

The student version cannot be considered plagiarism because it provides the reference to Frick (1997) and also synthesizes the main ideas from the original version with no literal paraphrasing and word-for-word repetition. Although some informations in the student version may seem paraphrases from the original version, they are rather necessary informations that cannot be changed or left unsaid just because they work as clear examples and arguments. The student version sounds like a simplified and interpreted version of the original one with a reference very well done.

Answer:

The answer is B!

Explanation:

Hope this helps :D

Answer:

Man who has committed such an abominable crime must get the most severe punishment.

Explanation:

Abominable is an adjective used to qualify something that causes moral revulsion. For the historical record, what is known as a crime against nature used to have a longer name, which was a "detestable and abominable crime against nature, committed with mankind or beast."

Answer:

The sentence "He quit smoking five years ago; he still craves a cigarette from time to time" is written correctly.

Explanation:

In the structure we are analyzing here, we have two independent clauses that were correctly put together with proper punctuation. It's worth remembering that an independent clause is a group of words that can stay alone as a sentence. It offers information that makes sense without the help of another sentence.

A run-on sentence only happens when independent clauses are joined incorrectly. If put together without any sort of punctuation, we have a fused sentence. When we join them only with a comma, we have a comma splice. One way to prevent these mistakes from happening is to join the clauses with a semicolon, and that is precisely what we have in the structure given. It is safe to conclude, thus, that "He quit smoking five years ago; he still craves a cigarette from time to time" is correct.

Answer:

Centralized organization

Explanation:

In a centralized organization there is a concentration of all authority at the top of the company hierarchy (at the top). This is when most decisions are made by leaders, ie people who are strategically positioned at their higher hierarchical levels. This causes a reduction in the centers that will make the decisions. From this point of view, centralization means that there is an authority that will decide what is needed, and that person is located at the very top of the hierarchical pyramid of the company.

In other words, in this type of organization, high-level executives make most decisions and move them to lower levels for implementations.

Answer:

Difference between the reference page and bibliography is explained below.

Explanation:

In the case of reference page , you have to list or define those items which are  actually referred to and which are cited in the observer paper.

Whereas in the case  Bibliography, you have to list all the materials and items which you have consulted while preparing the essay whether you actually give reference to that or  cited that work or not.

The above mentioned explanation is the difference between a reference page and a bibliography.

Answer:

Could

Explanation:

 The modal verb could  correctly completes the sentence "She could be at home by now but it's not sure at all." This verb can be used for situations when it is expressed a possibility, specially slight or uncertain possibility. Could be can be used instead of may/might be. She may/ might/could be at home (perhaps she is at home).

Answer:

Thomas Gray

Explanation:

 The English poet Thosmas Gray wrote "Where ignorance is bliss, it is folly to wise", and this line is found in "Ode On a Distant Prospect Of Eton College". With this statement, he was not by any means talking against wisdom or knowlwdge, nor advocating ignorance, as many people interpreted it to be; he was just expressing a wish for a time he cherished because it didn't  demand so much erudition.

Answer:

According to Gottlob Frege, "Mark Twain" and "Samuel Clemens" have (B) the same reference but different senses

Explanation:

You have to consider that Mark Twain and Samuel Clemens are the same person. Then, Frege's expression refers to the fact that the words that we use in our language have a certain meaning and this meaning depends on the compression and context. One can think that the phrases "Mark Twain was a novelist" and "Samuel Clemens was a novelist" are the same since we are talking about the same person, but according to Frege these two sentences don't have the same meaning, because one person can believe one but no the other.  

So the sentence "the same reference but different senses" means that this two name refers to the same person, but the sense or meaning is different because each name can be persieve in a different way by every person.

Final answer:

According to Gottlob Frege, "Mark Twain" and "Samuel Clemens" have the same reference but different senses, as they both refer to the same person but evoke different associations.

Explanation:

According to Gottlob Frege, "Mark Twain" and "Samuel Clemens" have the same reference but different senses. Frege, a German philosopher, logician, and mathematician, made significant contributions to the philosophy of language, among other fields. In his view, the reference (or 'Bedeutung') of a name relates to the actual object or person it denotes, while the sense (or 'Sinn') of a name is related to the mode of presentation of the object or person.

Thus, when we consider the names "Mark Twain" and "Samuel Clemens," we recognize that they both refer to the same person, the famous American author. However, the sense in which they refer to this person is different. "Mark Twain" evokes the persona of the author as known to his readers, while "Samuel Clemens" refers to the personal life of the man behind the pseudonym.