Step-by-step explanation:
hi I have answered ur question
Explain why a positive times a negative is a negative number.
Explanation:
This can be explained by thinking numbers on the number line as:
Lets take we have to multiply a positive number (say, 2) with a negative number say (-3)
2×(-3)
Suppose someone is standing at 0 on the number line and to go to cover -3 , the person moves 3 units in the left hand side. Since, we have to compute for 2×(-3), The person has to cover the same distance twice. At last, he will be standing at -6, which is a negative number.
A image is shown below to represent the same.
Thus, a positive times a negative is a negative number.
Let A and B are n x n matrices from which A is invertible. Suppose AB is singular. What conclusion can be made about the invertibility of B?
Answer: Matrix B is non- invertible.
Step-by-step explanation:
A matrix is said to be be singular is its determinant is zero,
We know that if a matrix is singular then it is not invertible. (1)
Or if a matrix is invertible then it should be non-singular matrix. (2)
Given : A and B are n x n matrices from which A is invertible.
Then A must be non-singular matrix. ( from 2 )
If AB is singular.
Then either A is singular or B is singular but A is a non-singular matrix.
Then , matrix B should be a singular matrix. ( from 2 )
So Matrix B is non- invertible. ( from 1 )
Factor f(x) = 15x^3 - 15x^2 - 90x completely and determine the exact value(s) of the zero(s) and enter them as a comma separated list. x =
Answer:
[tex]x=-2,0,3[/tex]
Step-by-step explanation:
We have been given a function [tex]f(x)=15x^3-15x^2-90x[/tex]. We are asked to find the zeros of our given function.
To find the zeros of our given function, we will equate our given function by 0 as shown below:
[tex]15x^3-15x^2-90x=0[/tex]
Now, we will factor our equation. We can see that all terms of our equation a common factor that is [tex]15x[/tex].
Upon factoring out [tex]15x[/tex], we will get:
[tex]15x(x^2-x-6)=0[/tex]
Now, we will split the middle term of our equation into parts, whose sum is [tex]-1[/tex] and whose product is [tex]-6[/tex]. We know such two numbers are [tex]-3\text{ and }2[/tex].
[tex]15x(x^2-3x+2x-6)=0[/tex]
[tex]15x((x^2-3x)+(2x-6))=0[/tex]
[tex]15x(x(x-3)+2(x-3))=0[/tex]
[tex]15x(x-3)(x+2)=0[/tex]
Now, we will use zero product property to find the zeros of our given function.
[tex]15x=0\text{ (or) }(x-3)=0\text{ (or) }(x+2)=0[/tex]
[tex]15x=0\text{ (or) }x-3=0\text{ (or) }x+2=0[/tex]
[tex]\frac{15x}{15}=\frac{0}{15}\text{ (or) }x-3=0\text{ (or) }x+2=0[/tex]
[tex]x=0\text{ (or) }x=3\text{ (or) }x=-2[/tex]
Therefore, the zeros of our given function are [tex]x=-2,0,3[/tex].
What is the converse of the following: "If n is prime then n is odd or n is 2." A. If n is prime then n is odd or n is 2 B. If n is odd or n is 2 then n is composite. C. If n is even but not 2 then n is composite. D. If n is odd or n is 2 thenn is prime. E. If n is composite then n is even but not 2. F. If n is prime then n is even but not
Answer:
Option D "If n is odd or n is 2 then n is prime"
Step-by-step explanation:
we know that
To form the converse of the conditional statement, interchange the hypothesis and the conclusion.
In this problem
the conditional statement is "If n is prime then n is odd or n is 2."
The hypothesis is "If n is prime"
The conclusion is "n is odd or n is 2."
therefore
interchange the hypothesis and the conclusion
The converse is "If n is odd or n is 2 then n is prime"
Final answer:
The converse of 'If n is prime then n is odd or n is 2' is 'If n is odd or n is 2 then n is prime', therefore, the correct answer from the given options is D.
Explanation:
The converse of the statement 'If n is prime then n is odd or n is 2' is constructed by reversing the hypothesis and the conclusion. The converse would state 'If n is odd or n is 2 then n is prime'. Hence, the correct answer is D. We establish the converse by suggesting that the given properties (being odd or being the number 2) necessarily imply that a number is prime; however, it's important to note that while all prime numbers other than 2 are indeed odd, not all odd numbers are prime. Therefore, the converse is not logically equivalent to the original statement.
The average of 1/5 and other two numbers out of which one is the half of the other is 1/4. The smallest fraction out of unknowns is:
a) 1/6 b) 11/60 c) 1 1/30 d) 1/2 e) 9/20
Answer:
The smallest fraction is b 11/60
To find the smallest of the unknown fractions given that their average with 1/5 is 1/4, we denoted the smallest fraction as x, leading to a simple algebraic equation solution. After fixing an arithmetic error, we found that the smallest fraction is 1/6.
The question is asking for the smallest unknown fraction when the average of this smallest fraction, another fraction that is twice its size, and a known fraction 1/5 is 1/4. Let's denote the smallest fraction as x, which implies that the other fraction is 2x. Since the average of three numbers is the sum of those numbers divided by three, our equation is (1/5 + x + 2x) / 3 = 1/4. Simplifying the equation by combining like terms and solving for x will reveal the smallest fraction.
First, we sum the unknowns and the known fraction: 1/5 + x + 2x = 3x + 1/5. Now we multiply both sides of the equation by 3 (to eliminate the division by 3 on the left side), we get: 3x + 3/5 = 1/4. To solve for x, we must have like denominators, therefore we convert all fractions to have a common denominator of 20. The equation then becomes 60x + 12 = 5. Subtracting 12 from both sides gives us 60x = -7, thus x = -7/60.
However, since fractions cannot be negative in this context, we made an error in our calculations. We correctly need to equate 3x + 1/5 to 3/4 (because the average is 1/4 which is the same as 3/4 for three numbers), and now the solution proceeds without error. Solving from here, we find that x = 1/6, which is the smallest fraction and is the correct answer to the question.
Question 1
A county reports 250 deaths with a population of 500,000. What is the mortality rate?
For the same month last year, the mortality rate was .42 Have deaths increased, decreased, or stayed the same?
Possible answers:
Mortality rate is 0.5 per 1000
The death rates have increased.
Answer:
Mortality rate is 0.5 per 1000 habitant
the number of deaths have increased (from 210 to 250)
Step-by-step explanation:
Hello
Mortality rate is the number of deaths in a specific population,usually expressed in units of deaths per 1,000 individuals per year
[tex]Mortality\ rate\ (S)= \frac{(D)}{(P)} *10^{n} \\\\\\\\[/tex]
where
S=Mortality rate
D=deaths
P= population
n= is a conversion form ,such as multiplying by 10^{3}=1000, to get mortality rate per 1,000 individuals( we will use n=3)
step 1
asign
S=unknown
D=250
P=500000
n=3, (for each 1000 people)
step 2
Replace
[tex]S=\frac{250}{500000}*1000\\S=\ 0.5\ per\ 1000[/tex]
Mortality rate is 0.5 per 1000 habitant
step 3
what if S=0.42
S=0.42(assuming it is 0.42 per 1000,n=3)
D=unknown
P=500000
[tex](S)= \frac{(D)}{(P)} *10^{n}\\\\isolatin D\\\\S*P=D*10^{n}\\ D=\frac{S*P}{10^{n} } \\\\and\ replacing\\\\D=\frac{(0.42)*(500000)}{10^{3} }\\\\ Deaths=210\\[/tex]
the number of deaths have increased (from 210 to 250)
Have a great day
Materials covered: 1.1-1.5 Question 1: Give an example of a 3 x 3 matrix in row echelon form that represents for the following system characteristics: (a) In-consistent system. (b) Consistent system and has many solutions. (c) Consistent system and has a unique solution.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Consider the 3x3 matrices in row echelon form:
[tex]\left[\begin{array}{ccc}1&2&0\\0&1&2\\0&0&0\end{array}\right][/tex]
and
[tex]\left[\begin{array}{ccc}1&2&0\\0&1&2\\0&0&1\end{array}\right][/tex]
a) The augmented matrix
[tex]\left[\begin{array}{ccc|c}1&2&0&1\\0&1&2&1\\0&0&0&2\end{array}\right][/tex]
corresponds to an inconsistent system.
b) The augmented matrix
[tex]\left[\begin{array}{ccc|c}1&2&0&1\\0&1&2&1\\0&0&0&0\end{array}\right][/tex]
corresponds to a consistent system with infinite solutions.
(c) The augmented matrix
[tex]\left[\begin{array}{ccc|c}1&2&0&1\\0&1&2&1\\0&0&1&1\end{array}\right][/tex]
corresponds to a consistent system with infinite solutions.
Soles the differential equations using the substitution u=y’; u’=y”
y’y”=2
Answer with explanation:
The given differential equation
y'y''=2--------(1)
We have to apply the following substitution
u=y'
u'=y"
Applying these substitution in equation (1)
u u'=2
[tex]u \frac{du}{dx}=2\\\\ u du=2 dx\\\\ \int u du=\int 2 dx\\\\\frac{u^2}{2}=2 x+K\\\\\frac{y'^2}{2}=2 x+K\\\\y'^2=4 x+2 K\\\\y'=(4 x+2 K)^{\frac{1}{2}}\\\\ dy=(4 x+2 K)^{\frac{1}{2}} d x\\\\\int dy=\int(4 x+2 K)^{\frac{1}{2}} d x\\\\y=\frac{(4 x+2 K)^{\frac{3}{2}}}{4 \times \frac{3}{2}}+J\\\\y=\frac{(4 x+2 K)^{\frac{3}{2}}}{6}+J[/tex]
Where , J and K are constant of Integration.
The principal randomly selected six students to take an aptitude test. Their scores were: 81.6 72.0 81.1 86.4 70.2 83.1 Determine a 90% confidence interval for the mean score for all students
Answer:
84.38, 73.74
Step-by-step explanation:
score given 81.6, 72.0, 81.1, 86.4, 70.2, 83.1
sample size (n) = 6
[tex]mean = \dfrac{81.6+ 72.0+ 81.1+ 86.4+ 70.2+ 83.1}{6}[/tex]
mean = 79.06
standard deviation
[tex]\sigma =\sqrt{\frac{\sum (x-\bar{x})^2}{n-1}}[/tex]
[tex]\sigma =\sqrt{\frac{ (81.6-79.06)^2+(72-79.06)^2+(86.4-79.06)^2+(70.2-79.06)^2+(81.1-79.06)^2+(83.1-79.06)^2}{6-1}}[/tex]
σ = 6.47
level of significance (α) = 1 - 90% = 10%
confidence interval
[tex]\bar{x} \pm t_{\alpha}(\frac{S}{\sqrt{n}})\\79.06 \pm 2.015(\frac{6.47}{\sqrt{6} })[/tex]
=79.06 ± 5.32
= 84.38, 73.74
The 90% confidence interval for the mean score is calculated using the sample mean, standard deviation, and the Z-value from a Z-distribution table. The resulting range gives us a 90% confidence that the real population mean lies within this interval.
Explanation:To compute a 90% confidence interval for the mean score, we use the sample data we have, our sample mean, and our standard deviation. The confidence interval gives us a range of values that likely includes the true population mean. We use the standard statistical formula for the 90% confidence interval: X ± (Z(α/2) * (σ/√n))
First, calculate the sample mean (X) and the standard deviation (σ). The scores are: 81.6, 72.0, 81.1, 86.4, 70.2, 83.1. The X will be the total of all the scores divided by 6, and σ will be a measure of how much they deviate from the mean.
Next, insert these values into the determining a confidence interval formula. You will need the Z(α/2) value for a 90% confidence interval, which is 1.645 in a Z-distribution table. Finally, take your X ± the calculated result to achieve the 90% confidence interval.
Remember: a 90% confidence interval means that you can be 90% confident that the true mean for all students lies within this interval.
Learn more about 90% Confidence Interval here:https://brainly.com/question/33942998
#SPJ3
Convert 141 to base seven.
Answer:
(141)₁₀→(241)₇
Step-by-step explanation:
(141)₁₀→(?)₇
for conversion of number from decimal to base 7 value we have to
factor 141 by 7
which is shown in the figure attached below.
from the attached figure we can clearly see that the colored digit will
give the conversion
we will write the digit from the bottom as shown in figure
(141)₁₀→(241)₇
An experimental drug is administered to 80 randomly selected individuals, with the number of individuals responding favorably recorded.Does the probability experiment represent a binomial experiment?
Answer:
Yes, because the experiment satisfies all the criteria for a binomial experiment.
Step-by-step explanation:
A binomial experiment has the following criterias,
1. There must be a fixed number of trials
2. Each trial is independent of the others
3. There must be only two outcomes ( success and failure )
4. The probability of each outcome is same.
Given,
An experimental drug is administered to 80 randomly selected individuals, with the number of individuals responding favorably recorded,
The number of trials = 80 ( fixed )
Each individuals is independent,
Total outcomes = 2 ( yes or no ),
Also, the probability of each individual is same,
Hence, the given probability experiment represent a binomial experiment.
Installment Buying TV Town sells a big screen smart HDTV for $600 down and monthly payments of $30 for the next 3 years. If the interest rate is 1.25% per month on the unpaid balance, find (a) the cost of the TV (b) the total amount of interest paid
Answer:
a) $ 1465.418
b) $ 214.582
Step-by-step explanation:
Since, the monthly payment formula of a loan is,
[tex]P=\frac{PV(r)}{1-(1+r)^{-n}}[/tex]
Where, PV is the principal amount of the loan,
r is the monthly rate,
n is the total number of months,
Here, P = $ 30, r = 1.25 % = 0.0125, n = 36 ( since, time is 3 years also 1 year = 12 months )
Substituting the values,
[tex]30=\frac{PV(0.0125)}{1-(1+0.0125)^{-36}}[/tex]
By the graphing calculator,
[tex]PV=865.418[/tex]
a) Thus, the cost of the TV = Down Payment + Principal value of the loan
= $ 600 + $ 865.418
= $ 1465.418
b) Now, the total payment = Monthly payment × total months
= 30 × 36
= $ 1080
Hence, the total amount of interest paid = total payment - principal value of the loan
= $ 1080 - 865.418
= $ 214.582.
PLEASE HELP TRIG SEE ATTACHMENT WILL MARK BRAINLIEST
Answer:
sin Ф=3/√13
Cos Ф=2/√13
Tan Ф=3/2
Step-by-step explanation:
Let x=2
Let y=3
Let r be the length of line segment drawn from origin to the point
[tex]r=\sqrt{x^2+y^2}[/tex]
Find r
[tex]r=\sqrt{2^2+3^2} =\sqrt{4+9} =\sqrt{13}[/tex]
Apply the relationship for sine, cosine and tan of Ф where
r=hypotenuse
Sine Ф=length of opposite side÷hypotenuse
Sin Ф=O/H where o=3, hypotenuse =√13
sin Ф=3/√13
CosineФ=length of adjacent side÷hypotenuse
Cos Ф=A/H
Cos Ф=2/√13
Tan Ф=opposite length÷adjacent length
TanФ=O/A
Tan Ф=3/2
The maker of an automobile advertises that it takes 12 seconds to accelerate from 20 kilometers per hour to 65 kilometers per hour. Assuming constant acceleration, compute the acceleration in meters per second per second. Round your answer to three decimal places.
Answer:
The acceleration is 1.0416 m/[tex]s^{2}[/tex]
Step-by-step explanation:
In order to solve this problem we first need to know the formula for acceleration which is the following.
[tex]acceleration = \frac{final.velocity - initial.velocity}{final.time - initial.time}[/tex]
Since the time acceleration is calculated as [tex]m/s^{2}[/tex] we need to convert the km/h into m/s. Since 1km = 1000m and 1 hour = 3600 seconds, then
[tex]\frac{20*1000 }{3600s} = \frac{20,000m}{3600s} = \frac{20m}{3.6s}[/tex]
**Dividing numerator and denominator by 1000 to simplify**
[tex]\frac{65*1000 }{3600s} = \frac{65,000m}{3600s} = \frac{65m}{3.6s}[/tex]
**Dividing numerator and denominator by 1000 to simplify**
Now we can plug in the values into the acceleration formula to calculate the acceleration.
[tex]acceleration = \frac{\frac{65m}{3.6s}-\frac{20m}{3.6s} }{12s-0s}[/tex]
[tex]acceleration = \frac{\frac{45m}{3.6s}}{12s}[/tex]
[tex]acceleration = \frac{\frac{12.5m}{s}}{12s}[/tex]
[tex]acceleration = \frac{\frac{1.0416m}{s}}{s}[/tex]
Finally we can see that the acceleration is 1.0416 m/[tex]s^{2}[/tex]
In order to find the acceleration, we first need to convert the speed from km/h to m/s. Then we use the formula for acceleration which is the change in velocity divided by the change in time. The final acceleration is approximately 1.042 m/s².
Explanation:The subject of the question pertains to the concept of acceleration in Physics. Acceleration, measured in meters per second per second (m/s²), is the rate at which an object changes its velocity. To determine this, we first have to convert the velocities from kilometers per hour (km/h) to meters per second (m/s). We know that 1 km = 1,000 m and 1 hour = 3,600 s. Therefore:
20 km/h = 20,000 m/3,600 s = 5.56 m/s65 km/h = 65,000 m/3,600 s = 18.06 m/sNext we use the formula for acceleration: a = Δv / Δt. The change in velocity (Δv) is the final velocity minus the initial velocity. Thus, Δv = 18.06 m/s - 5.56 m/s = 12.5 m/s. The change in time (Δt) is given as 12 seconds.
Substituting these values into the formula, we get: a = Δv / Δt = 12.5 m/s ÷ 12 s = 1.042 m/s². Therefore, the car's acceleration, assuming it's constant, is approximately 1.042 m/s².
Learn more about Acceleration here:https://brainly.com/question/12550364
#SPJ11
Use Laplace transforms to solve the following initial value problem: x"+8x'+15x = 0; x(0) = 2, x'(0) = -3 PLEASE SHOW ALL WORK, OR RISK LOSING ALL POINTS!!!! x')=sX (s) - x(0) x"(t) = sº X(s) - sx(0) - x'(0)
Taking the transform of both sides gives
[tex]\mathcal L_s\{x''+8x'+15x\}=0[/tex]
[tex](s^2X(s)-sx(0)-x'(0))+8(sX(s)-x(0))+15X(s)=0[/tex]
where [tex]X(s)[/tex] denotes the Laplace transform of [tex]x(t)[/tex], [tex]\mathcal L_s\{x(t)\}[/tex]. Solve for [tex]X(s)[/tex] to get
[tex](s^2+8s+15)X(s)=2s+13[/tex]
[tex]X(s)=\dfrac{2s+13}{s^2+8s+15}=\dfrac{2s+13}{(s+3)(s+5)}[/tex]
Split the right side into partial fractions:
[tex]\dfrac{2s+13}{(s+3)(s+5)}=\dfrac a{s+3}+\dfrac b{s+5}[/tex]
[tex]2s+13=a(s+5)+b(s+3)[/tex]
If [tex]s=-3[/tex], then [tex]7=2a\implies a=\dfrac72[/tex]; if [tex]s=-5[/tex], then [tex]3=-2b\implies b=-\dfrac32[/tex]. So
[tex]X(s)=\dfrac72\dfrac1{s+3}-\dfrac32\dfrac1{s+5}[/tex]
Finally, take the inverse transform of both sides to solve for [tex]x(t)[/tex]:
[tex]x(t)=\dfrac72e^{-5t}-\dfrac32e^{-3t}[/tex]
The initial value problem is a second-order homogeneous differential equation that can be solved using the Laplace Transform. After substituting the initial conditions and simplifying the equation, one can decompose the equation using partial fraction decomposition and finally find the solution in the time domain.
Explanation:Your given initial value problem is a second-order homogeneous differential equation. You should use the Laplace Transform to solve it. The Laplace transform of this equation is: L{x''(t) + 8x'(t) + 15x(t)} = 0 which simplifies to s²X(s) - sx(0) - x'(0) + 8[sX(s) - x(0)] + 15X(s) = 0. Substituting the initial conditions x(0) = 2 and x'(0) = -3, we get s²X(s) - 2s - (-3) + 8[sX(s) - 2] + 15X(s) = 0, then simplify to (s² + 8s + 15)X(s) = 2s + 3.
The roots of the quadratic equation s² + 8s + 15 = 0 are -5 and -3. So, the solution of the equation X(s) = (2s + 3) / (s² + 8s + 15) can be solved by using partial fraction decomposition. Therefore, the solution in the time domain would be x(t) = 2e⁻³ᵗ - e⁻⁵ᵗ.
Learn more about Laplace Transform here:https://brainly.com/question/31481915
#SPJ11
The principal at Apple Blossom High School decided to take her students on a field trip to the movie theater. A total of 250 people went on the trip. Adults paid $4.50 for a ticket and students paid $2.50 for a ticket. How many students and how many adults went to the movies if they paid a total of $805 at the movie theater?
Answer:
90 adults; 160 students
Step-by-step explanation:
Let "a" represent the number of adults who went. The number of students can be represented by (250-a). Then the total cost of tickets is ...
4.50a +2.50(250-a) = 805
2a + 625 = 805 . . . . . . simplify
2a = 180 . . . . . . . . . . . . subtract 625
a = 90 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . divide by 2
# of students = 250 -90 = 160
160 students and 90 adults went to the movies.
Answer:
the answer is 90 adults , and 160 students
You have just won $150,000 from a lottery. If you invest all this amount in a tax-free money market fund earning 8% compounded weekly, how long do you have to wait to become a millionaire? (Round your answer to two decimal places.)
Answer:
1234.08 weeks.
Step-by-step explanation:
Since, the amount formula in compound interest is,
[tex]A=P(1+r)^t[/tex]
Where, P is the principal amount,
r is the rate per period,
t is the number of periods,
Given,
P = $ 150,000,
Annual rate = 8 % = 0.08,
So, the weekly rate, r = [tex]\frac{0.08}{52}[/tex] ( 1 year = 52 weeks )
A = 1,000,000
By substituting the values,
[tex]1000000=150000(1+\frac{0.08}{52})^t[/tex]
[tex]\frac{1000000}{150000}=(\frac{52+0.08}{52})^t[/tex]
[tex]\frac{20}{3}=(\frac{52.08}{52})^t[/tex]
Taking log both sides,
[tex]log(\frac{20}{3})=t log(\frac{52.08}{52})[/tex]
[tex]\implies t = \frac{log(\frac{20}{3})}{ log(\frac{52.08}{52})}=1234.07630713\approx 1234.08[/tex]
Hence, for become a millionaire we should wait 1234.08 weeks.
A sample of 81 calculus students at a large college had a mean mathematics ACT score of 26 with a standard deviation of 6. Find a 95% confidence interval for the mean mathematics ACT score for all calculus students at this college.
Final answer:
The 95% confidence interval for the mean mathematics ACT score for all calculus students at this college is calculated to be between 24.693 and 27.307.
Explanation:
To calculate a 95% confidence interval for the mean mathematics ACT score for all calculus students at the college, we use the sample mean and standard deviation along with the z-score for a 95% confidence level. Since the sample size is large (n=81), we can use the z-distribution as an approximation for the t-distribution.
The formula for a confidence interval is:
Mean ± (z-score * (Standard Deviation / √n))
Here, the sample mean (μ) is 26, the standard deviation (s) is 6, and the sample size (n) is 81. For a 95% confidence level, the z-score is approximately 1.96.
Now we calculate the margin of error (ME):
ME = 1.96 * (6 / √81) = 1.96 * (6 / 9) = 1.96 * 0.6667 = 1.307
Therefore, the 95% confidence interval is
26 ± 1.307
Lower Limit = 26 - 1.307 = 24.693
Upper Limit = 26 + 1.307 = 27.307
The confidence interval is (24.693, 27.307).
We estimate with 95 percent confidence that the true population mean for the mathematics ACT score for all calculus students at the college is between 24.693 and 27.307.
For the mathematics part of the SAT the mean is 514 with a standard deviation of 113, and for the mathematics part of the ACT the mean is 20.6 with a standard deviation of 5.1. Bob scores a 660 on the SAT and a 27 on the ACT. Use z-scores to determine on which test he performed better.
Answer:
Bob performed better in mathematics part of the SAT than the ACT
Step-by-step explanation:
We need to calculate the z-scores for both parts and compare them.
Z-score for the SAT is calculated using the formula:
[tex]Z=\frac{X-\mu}{\sigma}[/tex]
where [tex]\mu=514[/tex] is the mean and [tex]\sigma=113[/tex] is the standard deviation, and [tex]X=660[/tex] is the SAT test score.
We plug in these values to obtain:
[tex]Z=\frac{660-514}{113}[/tex]
[tex]Z=\frac{146}{113}=1.29[/tex] to the nearest hundredth.
We use the same formula to calculate the z-score for the ACT too.
Where [tex]\mu=20.6[/tex] is the mean and [tex]\sigma=5.1[/tex] is the standard deviation, and [tex]X=27[/tex] is the ACT test score.
We substitute the values to get:
[tex]Z=\frac{27-20.6}{5.1}=1.25[/tex] to the nearest hundredth.
Since 1.29 > 1.25, Bob performed better in mathematics part of the SAT
Using z-scores to determine where Bob's performance stands compared to others, we find that he performed slightly better on the SAT with a z-score of 1.29, than on the ACT with a z-score of 1.25.
Explanation:To determine on which test Bob performed better, we have to calculate his z-scores on both the SAT and ACT. Z-score is a statistical measurement that describes a score's relationship to the mean of a group of scores. It indicates how many standard deviations an element is from the mean.
Here is how you calculate the z-score: z = (X - μ) / σ, where X is the individual score, μ is the mean, and σ is the standard deviation.
We can apply this formula to both of Bob's scores. For the SAT: z = (660 - 514) / 113 ≈ 1.29 For the ACT: z = (27 - 20.6) / 5.1 ≈ 1.25
Comparing the z-scores, Bob's score is above the mean by 1.29 standard deviations on the SAT and by 1.25 standard deviations on the ACT. Therefore, Bob performed slightly better on the SAT than on the ACT when comparing his scores to other test takers.
Learn more about Z-Scores here:https://brainly.com/question/15016913
#SPJ3
6. Use the element method and proof by contradiction to prove that for any sets A,B and C, if B nCCA, then (C - A) n (B - A)=0.
Answer:
Suppose,
(C - A) ∩ (B - A) ≠ ∅
Let x is an element of (C - A) ∩ (B - A),
That is, x ∈ (C - A) ∩ (B - A),
⇒ x ∈ C - A and x ∈ B - A
⇒ x ∈ C, x ∉ A and x ∈ B, x ∉ A
⇒ x ∈ B ∩ C and x ∉ A
⇒ B ∩ C ⊄ A
But we have given,
B ∩ C ⊂ A
Therefore, our assumption is wrong,
And, there is no common elements in (C - A) and (B-A),
That is, (C - A) ∩ (B - A) = ∅
Hence proved...
Rewrite the system of linear equations as a matrix equation AX = B.
leftbrace2.gif
2x1 + 5x2 − 2x3 + x4 + 2x5 = 1
x1 + x2 − 2x3 + x4 + 4x5 = 5
Answer:
Given: [tex]\begin{bmatrix}2&5&-2&1&2\\1&1&-2&1&4\end{bmatrix}[/tex]
[tex]2x_{1}+5 x_{2} - 2_{3} + x_{4} + 2x_{5}\\[tex]
[tex]x_{1}+ x_{2} - 2_{3} + x_{4} + 4x_{5}\\[/tex]
The system of linear equations in matrix form may be written as:
AX=B,
where,
A is coefficient matrix of order [tex]2\times 4[/tex] and is given by:
A = [tex]\begin{bmatrix}2&5&-2&1&2\\1&1&-2&1&4\end{bmatrix}[/tex]
X is variable matrix of order [tex]5\times 1[/tex] and is given by:
X= [tex]\begin{bmatrix}x_{_{1}}\\x_{_{2}}\\x_{3}\\x_{4}\\x_{5}\end{bmatrix}[/tex]
and B is the contant matrix of order [tex]2\times 1[/tex] and is given by:
B = [tex]\begin{bmatrix}1\\5\end{bmatrix}[/tex]
Now, AX=B
[tex]\begin{bmatrix}2&5&-2&1&2\\1&1&-2&1&4\end{bmatrix}[/tex]. [tex]\begin{bmatrix}x_{_{1}}\\x_{_{2}}\\x_{3}\\x_{4}\\x_{5}\end{bmatrix}[/tex] = [tex]\begin{bmatrix}1\\5\end{bmatrix}[/tex]
What is the rate of markup based on cost if a desk has an 84% markup based on the selling price?
Answer:
525%
Step-by-step explanation:
The relationship between the variables is ...
cost + markup = selling price
cost + 84%(selling price) = selling price
cost = selling price(100% -84%) = 16%(selling price)
Then the markup based on cost is ...
markup/cost = (84%(selling price))/(16%(selling price)) = 84/16
markup/cost = 5.25 = 525%
Now there is a door whose height is more than its width by 6 chi 8 cun. The distance between the [opposite] corners is 1 zhang. Find the height and width of the door.NOTE: 1 zhang = 10 chi = 100 cun. Give your answers inunits of chi and cun.
Answer:
height: 9 chi 6 cunwidth: 2 chi 8 cunStep-by-step explanation:
The factor-of-ten relationship between the different units means we can combine the numbers in decimal fashion. If 1 unit is 1 zhang, then 1 chi is 0.1 zhang and 1 cun is 0.01 zhang. Hence 6 chi 8 cun is 0.68 zhang.
Let x and y represent the width and height, respectively. In terms of zhang, we have ...
y - x = 0.68
x^2 +y^2 = 1^2
Substituting y = 0.68 +x into the second equation gives ...
x^2 + (x +0.68)^2 = 1
2x^2 +1.36x - 0.5376 = 0 . . . . . eliminate parentheses, subtract 1
Using the quadratic formula, we have ...
x = (-1.36 ±√(1.36^2 -4(2)(-0.5376)))/(2·2) = (-1.36 ±√6.1504)/4
x = 0.28 . . . . . the negative root is of no interest
y = 0.28 +0.68 = 0.96
In units of chi and cun, the dimensions are ...
height: 9 chi 6 cun
width: 2 chi 8 cun
Answer:
Height: 9 chi 6 cun
Width: 2 chi 8 cun
Step-by-step explanation:
Now there is a door whose height is more than its width by 6 chi 8 cun. The distance between the [opposite] corners is 1 zhang. The height of the door is 9 chi 6 cun and the width of the door is 2 chi 8 cun.
1 zhang = 10 chi = 100 cun
African Americans in a St. Louis suburb sued the city claiming they were discriminated against in schoolteacher hiring. Of the city's population, 5.7% were African American; of 405 teachers in the school system, 15 were African American. Set up appropriate hypotheses and determine whether African Americans are underrepresented.
Final answer:
To investigate if African Americans are underrepresented among teachers in a St. Louis suburb, a hypothesis test can be set up comparing the proportion of African American teachers to the African American population in the city. The null hypothesis is that the proportions are equal, while the alternative hypothesis is that the teacher proportion is less. A statistical test, such as a chi-square test, can then be used to assess representation.
Explanation:
To determine whether African Americans are underrepresented in the schoolteacher hiring in a St. Louis suburb, we can set up a hypothesis test. According to the data provided, African Americans make up 5.7% of the city's population. Out of 405 teachers in the school system, only 15 are African American. To establish the hypotheses, we consider the null hypothesis (H0) that African Americans are represented in teaching positions at the same rate as they are in the general population, and the alternative hypothesis (H1) that African Americans are underrepresented in teaching positions compared to their proportion in the general population.
For the null hypothesis (H0): The proportion of African American teachers is equal to the proportion of the African American population in the city (5.7%). For the alternative hypothesis (H1): The proportion of African American teachers is less than the proportion of the African American population in the city (5.7%). The next step is to perform a statistical test, such as a chi-square test of independence, to determine if the observed data (15 out of 405 teachers) significantly deviates from what would be expected under the null hypothesis, based on the proportion of the African American population in the city.
If the p-value obtained from the statistical test is below a predetermined significance level, usually 0.05, we would reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative hypothesis, suggesting that African Americans are indeed underrepresented. This statistical approach does not consider other factors that may influence hiring, but it does provide a starting point to understand representation.
Find an equation for the line that passes through the points (-6, -1) and (4, 5)
Answer:
y=3/5x+13/5
Step-by-step explanation:
Finding the slope:
m=6/10
m=3/5
The y intercept is 13/5
Thus, the equation is y=3/5x+13/5
Answer:
Equation of the given line is, y = (3/5)x +13/5
Step-by-step explanation:
Points to remember
Equation of the line passing through the poits (x1, y1) and (x2, y2) and slope m is given by
(y - y1)/(x - x1) = m where slope m = (y2 - y1)/(x2 - x1)
To find the slope of line
Here (x1, y1) = (-6, -1) and (x2, y2) = (4, 5)
Slope = (y2 - y1)/(x2 - x1)
= (5 - -1)/(4 - -6)
= 6/10 = 3/5
To find the equation
(y - y1)/(x - x1) = m
(y - -1)/(x - -6) = 3/5
(y + 1)/(x + 6) = 3/5
5(y + 1) = 3(x + 6)
5y + 5 = 3x + 18
5y = 3x + 13
y = (3/5)x +13/5
From a standard 52-card deck, how many eight-card hands consists of three cards of one denomination, three cards of another denomination, and two cards of a third denomination?
Answer:82,368
Step-by-step explanation:
Final answer:
The total number of eight-card hands formed from a standard 52-card deck where the hand consists of three cards of one denomination, three cards of another, and two cards of a third is 27,456. This is calculated by finding combinations of denominations and the specific cards within those denominations.
Explanation:
To answer the question of how many eight-card hands can be formed from a standard 52-card deck, where the hand consists of three cards of one denomination, three cards of another denomination, and two cards of a third denomination, we have to use combinations. This is a problem of combinatorics in which we are finding the number of ways to select items from a group without regard to order.
First, we choose the denominations. There are 13 denominations and we want to choose 3 of them for our hand. Using the combination formula, this can be done in C(13, 3) ways:
C(13, 3) = 13! / (3! × (13-3)!) = 286
After choosing the denominations, we need to select the specific cards. For each of the first two denominations, we select 3 out of the 4 available suits, and for the third denomination, we select 2 out of the 4 suits. This can be done as follows:
C(4, 3) for the first denomination: C(4, 3) = 4 ways
C(4, 3) for the second denomination: C(4, 3) = 4 ways
C(4, 2) for the third denomination: C(4, 2) = 6 ways
Multiplying the ways to choose the denominations by the ways to choose the cards for each denomination gives us the total number of distinct hands.
Total hands = C(13, 3) × C(4, 3) × C(4, 3) × C(4, 2) = 286 × 4 × 4 × 6 = 27,456
Therefore, there are 27,456 different eight-card hands that meet the given criteria.
roduction records indicate that 2.8% of the light bulbs produced in a facility are defective. A random sample of 30 light bulbs was selected. a. Use the binomial distribution to determine the probability that fewer than three defective bulbs are found.
Answer: Our required probability is 0.947.
Step-by-step explanation:
Since we have given that
Number of light bulbs selected = 30
Probability that the light bulb produced in a facility are defective = 2.8% = 0.028
We need to find the probability that fewer than 3 defective bulbs are found.
We will use "Binomial distribution":
n = 30, p = 0.028
so, P(X>3)=P(X=0)+P(X=1)+P(X=2)
So, it becomes,
[tex]P(X=0)=(1-0.0.28)^{30}=0.426[/tex]
and
[tex]P(X=1)=^{30}C_1(0.028)(0.972)^{29}=0.368\\\\P(X=2)=^{30}C_2(0.028)^2(0.972)^28=0.153[/tex]
So, the probability that fewer than three defective bulbs are defective is given by
[tex]0.426+0.368+0.153\\\\=0.947[/tex]
2)Whitney is shopping for party supplies. She finds a package of 10 plates, 16 napkins, and a package of 8 cups. What is the least number of packages of plates, napkins, and cups so that she has the same number of each? Write answer in sentence form.
Final answer:
To have the same number of plates, napkins, and cups, Whitney will need at least 80 of each.
Explanation:
To find the least number of packages of plates, napkins, and cups so that Whitney has the same number of each, we need to find the least common multiple (LCM) of 10, 16, and 8. The LCM is the smallest multiple that all three numbers have in common.
10 = 2 x 5, 16 = 2 x 2 x 2 x 2, and 8 = 2 x 2 x 2
We can identify the prime factors of each number and then multiply the highest factor from each number. In this case, the LCM is 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 5 = 80.
Therefore, Whitney will need at least 80 plates, 80 napkins, and 80 cups to have the same number of each.
Each side of a square is increasing at a rate of 5 cm/s. At what rate is the area of the square increasing when the area of the square is 81 cm2? cm2/s
The rate at which the area of the square is increasing when the area of the square is [tex]\( 81 \, \text{cm}^2 \) is \( 90 \, \text{cm}^2/\text{s} \)[/tex].
Let x represent the length of a side of the square, and A represent the area of the square.
We know that the area A of a square is given by [tex]\( A = x^2 \).[/tex]
Differentiating both sides with respect to time t, we get:
[tex]\[ \frac{dA}{dt} = 2x \frac{dx}{dt} \][/tex]
Given that each side of the square is increasing at a rate of [tex]\( 5 \, \text{cm/s} \), we have \( \frac{dx}{dt} = 5 \, \text{cm/s} \).[/tex]
We are asked to find the rate at which the area of the square is increasing when the area of the square is [tex]\( 81 \, \text{cm}^2 \)[/tex], so we need to find [tex]\( \frac{dA}{dt} \) when \( A = 81 \)[/tex].
We can find x when A=81:
[tex]\[ A = x^2 \]\[ 81 = x^2 \]\[ x = 9 \][/tex]
Now, plug in x=9 and [tex]\( \frac{dx}{dt} = 5 \)[/tex] into the equation for [tex]\[ \frac{dA}{dt} = 2x \frac{dx}{dt} \][/tex]
[tex]\[ \frac{dA}{dt} = 2(9)(5) \][/tex]
[tex]\[ \frac{dA}{dt} = 90 \, \text{cm}^2/\text{s} \][/tex]
So, the rate at which the area of the square is increasing when the area of the square is [tex]\( 81 \, \text{cm}^2 \) is \( 90 \, \text{cm}^2/\text{s} \)[/tex].
If there are 1.338 trillion barrels of oil in proven reserves and oil consumption is 82.78 million barrels per day, what is the maximum number of years current proven supply of oil runs out, if consumption does not decrease?
Answer:
Oil supply will run out in 44.283 years.
Step-by-step explanation:
There are 1.338 trillion barrels of oil in proven reserves.
If oil consumption is 82.78 million barrels per day then we have to calculate the number of years in which supply of oil runs out.
In this sum we will convert 1.338 million barrels of oil into million barrels first then apply unitary method to calculate the time in which oil supply runs out.
Since 1 trillion = [tex]10^{6}[/tex] million
Therefore, 1.338 trillion = 1.338×[tex]10^{6}[/tex] million
∵ 82.78 million barrels oil is the consumption of = 1 day
∴ 1 million barrels oil is the consumption of = [tex]\frac{1}{82.78}[/tex] day
∴ 1.338×[tex]10^{6}[/tex] barrels will be consumed in = [tex]\frac{1.338(10^{6})}{82.78}[/tex] days
= 16163.3245 days
≈ [tex]\frac{16163.3245}{365}[/tex] years
≈ 44.283 years
Therefore, oil supply will run out in 44.283 years