Answer:
E. the social facilitation effect
Explanation:
he is not working on this he is working on other things
The correct option is E. The social facilitation effect.
What is the social facilitation effect?Social facilitation refers to the finding that people sometimes show an increased level of effort as a result of the real, imagined, or implied presence of others. The concept was first identified by Norman Triplett in 1898, when he noticed that cyclists' performance was facilitated (helped) when training as a group.
What is an example of social facilitation?A musician/actor/performer who becomes energized by having an audience and does a better performance. Find that you do better work if you go to a library than if you stay at home to study.
Learn more about the social facilitation effect here https://brainly.com/question/16407087
#SPJ2
A group of people within the domain of a state creates their own organization in an effort to challenge inequities and assert their political rights to resources and recognition within their state. What is this type of formal organization called?
Civil society organization is the correct answer.
Civil society organization (CSO), also known as non-governmental organization, is a group of people within society that unite with the primary purpose of asserting their political rights and seeking recognition within the state by challenging inequities regarding human rights, environment, anti-corruption and labor standards.
While driving in heavy traffic, Nathan narrowly misses hitting another car. After the event, his heart rate and blood pressure increase. According to Selye, Nathan is MOST likely in which phase of the general adaptation syndrome?
(A) resistance
(B) exhaustion
(C) alarm reaction
(D) primary appraisal
Answer:
c
Explanation:
I could be wrong, but alarm reaction sounds correct
The defendant and an accomplice were on trial together for burglary. Both had given confessions implicating themselves and their accomplice. At trial, the defendant maintained that his confession had been obtained through improper coercion by the police. For the purpose of countering the claim of coercion, the prosecution seeks to place the accomplice’s confession into evidence. After objection by the defendant’s counsel, the judge agrees to issue a limiting instruction to the jury that the confession is to be considered only with regard to the question of whether the defendant’s confession was coerced. May the accomplice’s confession be admitted under that condition?
Answer: Yes.
Explanation: Coercion is an illegal practice adopted by some police officers to force individuals accused of a crime to act a certain way or to induce them to give desirable responses. The accomplice's confession will be admitted because the judge's instruction limits consideration of the confession when there's a coercion issue.
When Gina was 10, she swam in the ocean for the first time. She remembers the feeling of kicking her feet, slicing her arms through the water, tasting the tangy salt water, floating, and learning from her father that salt water is more dense than fresh water, which makes floating easier. Which element is a semantic memory?A. The feeling of floating on her backB. That salt water is more dense than fresh waterC. The familiar feel of kicking her feet and slicing her arms through the waterD. How tangy the salt water was
Sacha is 27 and her sister Malia is 16. They both enjoy espresso drinks and consume the same size and type of drink, but one of the sisters experiences greater physiological and behavioral effects than the other. Which sister has a greater response to caffeine, and why?
Answer:
A) Malia will have greater physiological and behavioral effects because she has yet not reach her adult weight.
Explanation:
Malia, who is 16 years old, is more likely to experience greater effects from caffeine due to a less developed metabolism and lower body tolerance compared to her sister Sacha, who is 27. Age, metabolism, and body composition play significant roles in caffeine sensitivity and processing.
The sister who is more likely to exhibit greater physiological and behavioral effects from consuming the same size and type of espresso drink is Malia, who is 16 years old. The main reason for this is rooted in human biology, particularly the fact that metabolism and body composition can significantly affect how caffeine is processed in the body. Younger individuals like Malia may not have fully developed these systems to the same extent as their older counterparts, leading to a higher sensitivity to caffeine.
Furthermore, due to Sacha being 27 years old, her body is more likely to have developed tolerance to caffeine if she is a regular consumer, which would reduce its effects. Age-related differences in body mass, metabolic rate, and liver enzyme activity also contribute to how caffeine affects individuals differently. It is important to consider that caffeine restrictions are commonly suggested for younger individuals, suggesting that their bodies are less prepared to handle caffeine's stimulating effects.
Joe is a moderately attractive man. He is dating 3 women. Penelope is a very attractive woman, Susanna is moderately attractive, and Wanda is relatively unattractive. All else being equal, who is he most likely to end up with? Wand A. Men of moderate attractiveness tend to end up with women less attractive than they are. We don’t know. There is no strong connection between the attractiveness of one partner and the attractiveness of the other partner. Susann A. People tend to end up with those who match them in attractiveness. Penelope. Attractive women tend to end up with men less attractive than they are.
The reason why "Susanna" would be the correct answer because Joe would mostly likely end up with Susanna because she meets the level of attraction that he has.
In life, people most of the time would end up dating/going out with someone that matches their attraction.
For example, a very attractive man would often end up with a very attractive woman. This is because the people would want someone else that they want as their partner meet the "visual" standards that they have.
If someone very attractive ends up with someone less attractive, then there could be a chance that the very attractive person starts losing attraction to the less attractive person, but that's not always the case.
I hope this helped you out.Good luck on your academics.Have a fantastic day!Thirty-year-old Alayna is painfully shy and so sensitive to rejection that she rarely talks to people other than her coworkers and her family members. Occasionally, a man asks her out, but she tend to refuse. She spends a good deal of time reading and writing in her diary about her loneliness and other feelings. According to Erikson's theory, Alayna is facing the psychosocial conflict of _____ and is likely to develop _____.
Answer:
The answer would be Intimacy versus isolation; isolation
Hopes this helps, good luck <3
Alayna faces Erikson's psychosocial conflict of Intimacy vs. Isolation and may develop loneliness and emotional isolation if this conflict is not resolved positively, as her shyness and fear of rejection inhibit her from forming close relationships.
Thirty-year-old Alayna is facing the psychosocial conflict of Intimacy vs. Isolation, which is a phase described by Erik Erikson wherein individuals in their early adulthood, typically in their 20s through early 40s, need to form intimate, loving relationships with other people.
Success in this stage will lead to strong relationships, while failure results in loneliness and isolation. Given Alayna's shyness and her sensitivity to rejection, which makes her avoid relationships unless she is certain of acceptance, it suggests she may develop feelings of loneliness and emotional isolation if this conflict is not resolved positively. Alayna's unwillingness to take risks in social scenarios may stem from unresolved issues in earlier developmental stages.
When an IRB is reviewing a research study and they are considering if a potential subject population is vulnerable, they should consider: Has the researcher completed required training? Are there adequate resources to conduct the study? Is there a power differential between researchers and subjects? Are the research procedures greater than minimal risk of harm?
B. Is there a power differential between researchers and subjects?
Brainliest Please :)
An Institutional Review Board (IRB) reviews and approves research studies involving human participants. Factors to consider when assessing if a potential subject population is vulnerable include researcher training, available resources, power differentials, and the risk of harm in research procedures.
Explanation:An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is responsible for reviewing and approving research studies that involve human participants. When considering if a potential subject population is vulnerable, the IRB should consider various factors. These include whether the researcher has completed required training, if there are adequate resources to conduct the study, if there is a power differential between researchers and subjects, and if the research procedures pose a risk of harm greater than minimal.
Learn more about IRB and vulnerable subject populations here:https://brainly.com/question/5001059
#SPJ
In the case of Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the ________________ were outside the President's power to create and were, therefore, invalid.
Answer:
In the case of Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the military comissions were outside the President's power to create and were, therefore, invalid.
Explanation:
Hamdan v. Rumsfeld is a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States sustained that military commissions stablished by the Bush administration to try detainees at Guantanamo Bay lack "the power to proceed" because its structures and procedures violate both the Uniform Code of Military Justice and the four Geneva Conventions signed in 1949.
1. Anthony and Marie have a heated argument. During their fight, Anthony tells Marie that he hates her and wished that she would get hit by a bus. Later that evening, Anthony receives a call from a friend who tells him that Marie is in the hospital because she was struck by a bus. Anthony immediately blames himself and reasons that if he hadn't made that comment during their fight, Marie would not have been hit. What logical fallacy has Anthony committed?
Answer: it is Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc.
Explanation: Post Hoc Ergo Propter is a latin expression that means "after this, therefore because of this". It a logical fallacy and the reasoning is "Since event Y followed event X, event Y must have been caused by event X. It is a mistake because correlation appears to indicate causality.
Anthony made a post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy by assuming his words caused Marie's accident because the accident occurred after his statement, ignoring other unrelated factors.
Anthony has committed the post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy. This is a logical fallacy where one assumes that because one event followed another, the first event must have caused the second. In other words, just because Anthony's negative comment about Marie was followed by her accident, it does not mean his words caused the event to occur. This fallacy is often summarized as "after this, therefore because of this," which ignores the possibility that many other unrelated factors could have led to Marie's accident.
It is important to recognize that correlation does not imply causation. This fallacy is a common mistake that arises from our tendency to see patterns where none exist, and from our impulse to attribute cause and effect to events that may merely be coincidental. Anthony's belief is understandable on an emotional level, but it is irrational and does not hold under logical scrutiny.
In The Federalist Papers, James Madison argued that Select one:A. the large size of the United States was a source of political stability B. to be a republic, a country must be geographically smallC. church and state must be linked in order to encourage republican virtued. D. it was essential that slavery be abolished for liberty to flourish
Answer:
a. the large size of the United States was a source of political stability.
Explanation:
In The Federalist Papers, James Madison, who was a firm opponent to factions, argued that the large size of the United States was a source of political stability because in a large and diverse republican nation, it would be unlikely that a majority of people agreed on the same issues and hence, factions, which had a destructive role in society, would have less power.
James Madison, in The Federalist Papers, argued that the large size of the United States was a source of political stability, reducing the risk of factionalism.
Explanation:In The Federalist Papers, James Madison argued that the large size of the United States was a source of political stability. This belief was a part of his broader theory of a large republic, wherein he posits that the bigger the republic, the less likely it would fall to factionalism. The diversification of interests in a large republic would prevent any single group from gaining an undue influence.
Learn more about James Madison here:https://brainly.com/question/244183
#SPJ6
You have been working for several hours to carefully organize some supplies when you stop to take a break. When you come back you find that a co-worker has been carelessly searching through the supplies and messed up a lot of the work you did. Which of the following would you most likely do?
Answer:
The correct answer would be, Ignoring and start again, reminding yourself to leave a sign or a barrier, next time you take a break.
Explanation:
If I have been working for several hours to carefully organizing some office supplies, when I stop my work to take a break. I just leave the work and go on the break without putting any sign or tag over there. When i came back, i saw that one of my colleague has been carelessly searching through the supplies and has messed up a lot of work I did. I would probably won't say or do anything, because the mistake is mine, I didn't put any sign or barrier or tag at that place to restrict workers from coming into that area. So I would ignore my co worker's careless behavior and make myself sure about putting the sign next time I take a break.
Fill in the blanks with words that best complete the statement below:
(1) In 1677, the British legal system was structured in a way_____.
(2) To provide juries with more ____ about whether or not a contract existed, Parliament passed the ____. It required that in several types of cases, contracts had to be ____ . One category was contracts involving interests in ____ .
Answer:
(1) In 1677, the British legal system was structured in a way that made it susceptible to witnesses lying on the stand.
To provide juries with more reliable evidence about whether or not a contract existed, Parliament passed the Statutes of Frauds. It required that in several types of cases, contracts had to be in writing. One category was contracts involving interests in land.
Explanation:
The Statutes of Frauds was passed by the English Parliament in 1677. It put an end to executory contracts, in which the parties have not executed their obligations. As a result, such contracts are considered not illegal. Finally, the Parliament invalidated the Statute of Frauds because it decided the statute was helping people to cheat.
As a result of the China-Europe trade imbalance, European nations sought to acquire needed resources in order to participate fully in the world economy of that time. The major advantage they had—advanced weaponry and strong military strategies—resulted in what lasting legacy?
Answer:
colonialism
Explanation:
Colonialism is the policy of exerting control or authority over a territory occupied and administered by a group of individuals with military power, or by representatives of the government of a country to which that territory did not belong, against the will of its many inhabitants. They are sometimes deprived of part of their assets (such as arable land or pasture land) and any political rights they held.
While they were shopping, 6-year-old Elliot came running around one of the store aisles and excitedly asked his mother if she would buy him a $299 Microsoft Xbox 360 game console to use with their television at home. When his mother immediately refused, Elliot looked very dejected but apologized for asking. A few moments later, Elliot asked, "Well, can I get a new basket for my bicycle?" Clever Elliot appears to be using the _____ technique to persuade his mother.
Answer:
While they were shopping, 6-year-old Elliot came running around one of the store aisles and excitedly asked his mother if she would buy him a $299 Microsoft Xbox 360 game console to use with their television at home. When his mother immediately refused, Elliot looked very dejected but apologized for asking. A few moments later, Elliot asked, "Well, can I get a new basket for my bicycle?" Clever Elliot appears to be using the door-in-the-face technique to persuade his mother.
Explanation:
The door-in-the-face technique is commonly studied in social psychology as a compliance method. The persuader tries to covince the respondent to agree by making a large request that the respondent will reject as it were metaphorically slamming the door in the persuader's face.