My reasoning would be to look at that person paper . But kind of elaborate to it unless you don't know what to talk about. But if ya don't then just think about another way to say it.
Conventional moral reasoning is the second of three levels of moral reasoning in Kohlberg's Structural Theory of Moral Development.
According to Kohlberg's Structural Theory of Moral Development, conventional moral reasoning is the second of three levels of moral reasoning. At this level, people have internalized the moral standards and expectations of those closest to them and typically base their moral decisions on these standards and expectations.
The study of moral reasoning is concerned with how people develop and uphold moral ideals as well as how they perceive good and evil. It is the cornerstone of descriptive ethics and a branch of moral psychology that intersects with moral philosophy.
Learn more about Conventional moral reasoning here:
https://brainly.com/question/14274347
#SPJ2
Freud would agree that: a. parents should wean infants from the breast or bottle as soon as possible. b. how conflicts over weaning, toilet training, and sexual curiosity are resolved determine an individual's personality.c. individuals who smoke cigarettes probably had trouble learning how to toilet train. d. people's relationships to their family and culture are more important in determining development than are their sexual urges.
Answer:
b. how conflicts over weaning, toilet training, and sexual curiosity are resolved determine an individual's personality
Explanation:
According to Freud, psychosexual development would occur in stages, according to the area in which libido is most concentrated: the oral stage (exemplified by the pleasure of babies sucking on a pacifier, which has no vital function but only that of provide pleasure); the an*l stage (exemplified by children's pleasure in controlling their defecation); and then the phallic stage (manipulation of the sexual organs).
When encountering another vessel in darkness or reduced visibility, What do the red and green lights indicate?
A critically acclaimed movie that had received a number of awards opened in a small town. The film had portrayals of nudity and scenes involving sexuality, but its advertising was very tasteful and concentrated on its critical acclaim and its receipt of seven Academy Award nominations. Nevertheless, when the movie opened in the small town, there was a public outcry against it, including picketing. The town, which had been founded in the late nineteenth century by a fundamentalist religious group, remained very conservative and highly religious, and was the only community in the state where a consensus of the community would find the movie to be obscene. The town prosecutor went to the local court seeking an injunction to halt the showing of the movie. The theater owner refused to voluntarily stop showing the film and appeared in court to defend against the proposed injunction.What is the owner's best defense?A The proper "community standards" should be those of the entire state rather than of the town.B The film has some redeeming social value.C The Establishment Clause of the First Amendment prevents the state from enforcing a particular set of religious beliefs.D The film has proven artistic merit.
Answer:
D The film has proven artistic merit.
Explanation:
In united states, the right to fully express ourselves through is protected by the Article 10 of the Human Rights act. This expression cover all form of artistic creation as long as they do not infringe other people's right.
By claiming the film has proven artistic merit (proven by several awards), the owner of the theater could be protected from the religious group to show the film in his place of business and he can sue the religious group in case they dare to do something destructive during the business operation.
Jake is sympathetic and considerate of his friends' moods. he really identifies with their feelings and readily understands their point of view. he is well-known around campus, and he has great relationships with his classmates and professors. which area of intelligence does this exemplify? A. interpersonalB. intrapersonalC. linguisticD. naturalist
The correct answer is A. Interpersonal
Explanation:
According to Howard Gardner who was an important development psychologist, human intelligence does not focus into one ability or aspect but instead has different modalities or types. This includes the naturalist or naturalistic intelligence that focuses on the ability of understanding one's surroundings and elements from nature; the linguistic that focuses on communication and includes the ability to use texts, speeches, etc.; the intrapersonal that focus on understating the self or who we are and the interpersonal that different from the intrapersonal focuses on understanding others' feelings, emotions, moods and being empathetic. This implies, Jake mostly exemplifies the Interpersonal intelligence because he has a natural ability to identify and understand others' experiences, feelings, etc. and also he can be on the position of others and be empathetic.
Jake exemplifies interpersonal intelligence, which is the ability to understand the feelings, motivations, and needs of others, according to Howard Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences.
Explanation:Based on the description, Jake exemplifies A. interpersonal intelligence. Interpersonal intelligence refers to one's ability to understand and recognize the feelings, motivations, and needs of others, which includes empathy, the ability to recognize the mood, temperament, motivations, and intentions of others. Jake's ability to understand his friends' feelings, identify with their point of view, and maintain great relationships with his classmates and professors indicates strong interpersonal intelligence.
Interpersonal Intelligence is part of Howard Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences. It covers the sensitivity to others, including skills in social situations, cooperation with team activities, and empathy, which is the capacity to understand other people's feelings and perspectives.
Learn more about Interpersonal Intelligence here:https://brainly.com/question/31388708
#SPJ6
If Rob and Laura communicate in ways that are typical of their genders, then which of the following is most likely true? Laura uses more forceful gestures, whereas Rob is gentler when touching others. Rob is less likely to interrupt than Laura is. Laura tends to avoid eye contact more often than Rob does. Rob is more inclined to make direct statements, whereas Laura is likely to make more tentative statements.
Answer: the correct answer is Rob is more inclined to make direct statements, whereas Laura is likely to make more tentative statements.
Explanation:
In general, women are more emotional and men are cold and use direct statements whereas women are more into using tentative statements. However, it is important not to use generalizations so much because it is easy to fall into prejudices this way.
Final answer:
Rob is likely to make more direct statements, whereas Laura is likely to make more tentative statements, reflecting research by Tannen and Lakoff that suggest women tend to communicate in a cooperative manner while men are more assertive. Some researchers argue that gender differences in communication are not as pronounced as once thought.
Explanation:
If Rob and Laura communicate in ways that are typical of their genders, then it is most likely true that Rob is more inclined to make direct statements, whereas Laura is likely to make more tentative statements. This observation aligns with research conducted by linguists such as Deborah Tannen and Robin Lakoff, who suggest that gender influences communication styles. For example, women's speech patterns have been characterized by researchers as cooperative, aiming to emphasize equal relationships, and often include hedges, emotional language, and tag questions. Men, on the other hand, tend to speak in a more assertive and competitive manner, which can be observed through more frequent interruption in conversation and a tendency to assert their position in a hierarchy.
Additional findings about gender communication patterns note that men are likely to interrupt more and initiate conversation topics, while women make more supportive noises like "mm-hmm" and seek to express agreement and support. However, it's essential to recognize that individuals may vary, and such patterns do not apply universally to all men or women. It's also worth noting that some researchers, such as psychologist Janet Hyde, have challenged the notion of drastically different linguistic patterns based on gender, suggesting only slight differences in certain communicative behaviors.
Which of the following is not true about the alternative hypothesis? Select one: A. It is sometimes called the research hypothesis. B. It is usually a statement that the researcher hopes to demonstrate is true. C. Like the null hypothesis, it is always a statement about a population parameter. D. It is assumed to be true.
Answer:
B. It is usually a statement that the researcher hopes to demonstrate is true.
Explanation:
Alternative hypothesis is an assumption that there is inequality present between the means of the values of a population being compared, ie, it is an assumption that the alternative hypothesis is true. In other words, an alternative hypothesis is considered as any hypothesis that reflects the doubt that caused the researcher to perform the test. It is always represented by an inequality. This inequality represents the possible values of the evaluated parameter.
The alternative hypothesis is not assumed to be true. It is a statement of what a researcher thinks will occur if the null hypothesis is disproved, and it usually represents the claim that the researcher is seeking to substantiate through research. Therefore the option that is not true is Option D- It is assumed to be true.
Explanation:The correct answer to the question is: D. It is assumed to be true. This statement is not valid regarding the alternative hypothesis. The alternative hypothesis is not assumed to be true; instead, it's a statement of what a researcher thinks may detract from the null hypothesis. The alternative hypothesis is observed if the results of the study provide enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis.
In general, the alternative hypothesis is the researcher's claim about the population parameter, often one encoding the effects the research is seeking to detect (this might be a difference in population means or a nonzero correlation).It's called the alternative hypothesis because it's viewed as an alternative to the null hypothesis, which posits the absence of such effects.
Learn more about alternative hypothesis here:https://brainly.com/question/30899146
#SPJ3
The number of representatives from a state could increase if
If The States Population Has Increased.
On Christmas morning, 3-year-old Chuck opens one of his gifts from his mother and finds a new sweater. Disappointed that it is not a toy, Chuck frowns and throws the sweater aside in front of his mother with no regard for her feelings. In this example, Chuck is demonstrating ___
(A) centration.
(B) egocentric thought.
(C) conservation.
(D) intuitive thought.
Answer:
a
Explanation:
Chuck is demonstrating centration.
What is centration?Centration is the psychological explanation for the tendency to fixate on one conspicuous aspect of a situation while disregarding other, potentially major aspects. Centration is a behaviour that is commonly seen in the preoperational stage and was first described by the Swiss psychologist Jean Freud through his theory of cognitive-developmental levels. According to Piaget, egocentrism—a prevalent factor in preoperational children's delusional reasoning contributory to centration. Piaget performed the bulk of the study on centration, as demonstrated by his conservation tasks; however, more recent researchers have built on his theories.
Piaget utilized a variety of tasks to evaluate children's ability for scientific thought and logic, many of which centered on conservation. The capability to forecast that a specific amount will remain the very same despite changes to the container, form, or apparent size is known as preservation. The preservation of numbers, composition, mass, volume, and length are further conservation-related responsibilities.
The preservation of liquids assignment is probably the well centration-indicating job. In one variation, the youngster is shown two similarly full glasses, A1 and A2. When the child is asked about whether the two glasses hold the same amount of liquid, he or she almost consistently replies that they do.
To learn more about centration here
https://brainly.com/question/15145452
#SPJ2
Suppose that you and a friend are playing cards and you decide to make a friendly wager. The bet is that you will draw two cards without replacement from a standard deck. If both cards are clubs, your friend will pay you $531. Otherwise, you have to pay your friend $32. How much would you expect to win or lose?
Answer: I will expect to win $1.1156 for the bet.
Explanation:
probability 2 cards are clubs (13/52)*(12/51) = (0.25) * (0.2352)= 0.05882
other 1-0.05882= 0.94118
Expected value= $531 * 0.05882 - $32 (0.94118) = 31.2334- 30.1178
Expected value = $ 1,1156. Making this bet 100 times you will make $111.56
Which statement about federal and unitary systems is most accurate?a.In a federal system, power is concentrated in the states; in a unitary system, it is concentrated in the national government.b.In a federal system, the constitution allocates powers between states and federal government; in a unitary system, powers are lodged in the national government.c.Today there are more countries with federal systems than with unitary systems.d.The United States and Japan have federal systems, while Great Britain and Canada have unitary systems
Answer:weed
Explanation:cannabis
In a federal system, like the United States, the constitution shares power between the states and the federal government. In a unitary system, like Great Britain, all power resides in the central government.
Explanation:The most accurate statement about federal and unitary systems is that in a federal system, the constitution allocates powers between states and the federal government; in a unitary system, powers are lodged in the national government. For example, in the United States, a federal system, certain responsibilities like defense and monetary policy are handled by the federal government, while others like education and local law enforcement are typically the realm of the states. In contrast, Great Britain, a unitary system, centralizes its powers in the national (or central) government and any local governance is granted authority by this central government.
Learn more about Federal and Unitary Systems here:https://brainly.com/question/32817595
#SPJ6
Piaget believed that infants and toddlers __________. “think” with their eyes, ears, and hands are incapable of constructing schemes carry out many activities inside their heads assimilate more than they accommodate
Answer:
“think” with their eyes, ears, and hands
Explanation:
Piaget believed that infants and toddlers “think” with their eyes, ears, and hands.
Piaget believed that infants and toddlers “think” with their eyes, ears, and hands.
The answer is option A.
What does Piaget accept as true with approximate toddlers?Piaget believed that newborn babies have a small variety of innate schemas - even earlier than they have got had many opportunities to experience the sector. These neonatal schemas are the cognitive structures underlying innate reflexes. These reflexes are genetically programmed into us.
Piaget proposed 4 primary ranges of cognitive development and referred to as them sensorimotor intelligence, preoperational wondering, concrete operational wondering, and formal operational wondering. Each degree is correlated with an age length of early life, however simplest approximately.
Learn more about Piaget here: https://brainly.com/question/26516037
#SPJ2
A similarity between the separation of powers, the system of checks and balances, and federalism is that theyA) are all related exclusively to the federal government.B) are all ways that the Constitution limits government power.C) each illustrate the idea of popular sovereignty.D) each serve to increase the power of the federal government.
Answer:
B) are all ways that the Constitution limits government power
Explanation:
A similarity between the separation of powers, the system of checks and balances, and federalism are that they are all ways that the Constitution limits government power. The correct option is B.
What does the separation of power do to the government?Separation of powers thus refers to the division of government responsibilities into distinct branches in order to prevent one branch from performing the core functions of another. The goal is to prevent power concentration and to provide for checks and balances.
Federalism constrains government by establishing two sovereign powers—the national government and state governments—and thus limits the influence of both. Separation of powers imposes internal limits on government by dividing it against itself, assigning separate functions to different branches, and forcing them to share power.
Thus, the ideal selection is option B.
Learn more about the separation of power here:
https://brainly.com/question/1153314
#SPJ5
A fee simple owner of a restaurant provided in his will that the property should go on his death "in fee simple to my friend, but if during my friend's lifetime my son has children and those children are alive when my friend dies, then to said living children." When the owner died, the friend took over the restaurant.If the son has children and one or more of them are alive when the friend dies, who will take title to the restaurant at that time?A The friend's heirs, because the attempted gift to the son's children is invalid under the Rule Against Perpetuities.B The son's children, because their interest is not contingent, being a possibility of reverter.C The son's children, because their interest is vested, subject to defeasance.D The son's children, because their interest will vest, if at all, within a life in being + 21 years.
Answer: the correct answer is D. the son's children, because their interest will vest, if at all, within a life in being + 21 years.
Explanation:
In the USA, up until the age of majority you are considered a minor. Generally speaking, the age of majority is considered sometime between age 18 and 21 in the USA.
In this case, the simple owner will is clear about the reach of the legal instrument.
In the given legal scenario, the testator's friend initially receives the property in fee simple. The son's children, because their interest will vest, if at all, within a life in being + 21 years. The option (D) is correct.
According to the provided scenario, the title to the property (in this case, a restaurant) would pass in fee simple to the friend, with a subsequent condition that if the testator's son has children and they are alive when the friend dies, the property would then go to the son's living children.
This can be construed as a remainder interest which is contingent upon the friend's death during the lifetime of the testator's son's children. Since this contingency could potentially be satisfied within 21 years after the death of a life in being at the time the interest was created (in this scenario, the friend), it does not violate the Rule Against Perpetuities.
A company operated a small amusement park on property it owned near a residential neighborhood. On a day when the park was closed, a 10-year-old girl snuck into the park with some friends by climbing over a chain link fence. While climbing on one of the carnival rides, the girl slipped and cut her leg on an exposed gear assembly, sustaining serious injuries.Through her guardian ad litem, the girl brought suit against the company to recover damages for her injuries. At trial, she presented evidence of the accident and her injuries. In defense, the company established that the girl read and understood the "No Trespassing" signs that were attached to the fence. The company also established that it had not had any previous reports of children sneaking into the park when it was closed. Before submission of the case to the jury, the company moved for summary judgment.Is the court likely to grant the company's motion?A Yes, because the girl was a trespasser who the company had no reason to anticipate would be on the property.B Yes, because the girl knew she was trespassing and was old enough to recognize the danger.C No, because the jury could find that the company should have foreseen that children would sneak into the park.D No, because the appeal of the carnival rides attracted the girl into the park.
Answer: the correct answer is C. No, because the jury could find that the company should have foreseen that children would sneak into the park.
Explanation:
In this case, the company has the obligation to forsee possible threats and has no excuse for not having taken action in doing that.
Sean has tried repeatedly to find a job. After each unsuccessful attempt, he concludes that there is just something about him that will always get in the way of success in his life. Sean is displaying a ____________ explanatory style.
Answer:
pessimistic
Explanation:
Generally speaking, when people blame themselves for negative events, no matter how responsible they were for what happened, they might be showing aspects of pessimistic explanatory style. This is specially the case if they believe that things like that will just continue and will let this thought to affect many aspects of their lives and decision making.
You are trying to decide if your brother's obsession with neatness is a problem. You consider whether the behavior is atypical, dysfunctional, distressful, and/or deviant in order to assess whether it truly is:
Answer:
You consider whether the behavior is atypical, dysfunctional, distressful, and/or deviant in order to assess whether it truly is a psychological disorder, such as obsessive-compulsive disorder.
Explanation:
Psychological disorders refer to a combination of beliefs, thought patterns and behaviors that are clinically significant, and recurrently affect a person's social, emotional and occupational functioning. In this instance, if your brother's obsession with neatness is a problem and you are considering whether the behavior is atypical, dysfunctional, distressful, and/or deviant, you are likely checking if he has obsessive-compulsive disorder.
Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a type of anxiety disorder when a person has chronically intrusive and uncontrollable thoughts (obsessions), that lead to compulsive behaviors such as obsession with neatness, cleaning one's room, etc.
Thus, if you are trying to decide if your brother's obsession with neatness is a problem, you are assessing whether it truly is a psychological disorder, such as obsessive-compulsive disorder.
Rita Reporter works for a major news network and has been assigned to investigate a story about a woman's death in a small town. She interviews police and other public officials, and the investigation is pointing to the woman's ex-husband. When Rita reports live on the air, she states that the investigation is ongoing and that the ex-husband is the prime suspect. In fact, the police have just ruled out the ex-husband, but Rita has not yet been informed of that fact. The next day, the ex-husband is fired, his new wife moves out, and friends are now refusing to talk with him.
A) Rita is not guilty of defamation due to an absolute privilege.
B) Rita is not guilty of defamation due to a qualified privilege.
C) Rita is guilty of slander for telling a lie that caused injury to the ex-husband.
D) Rita is guilty of libel for telling a lie that caused injury to the ex-husband.
Answer:
The Answer Is B
:)
In the given case, Rita is not guilty of defamation due to a qualified privilege. Thus the correct option is B.
What is Defamation?A person, place, or thing is defamed when incorrect information about them is conveyed to a third party, harming their reputation. It includes a comment that harms the standing of a third party.
In the given case A reporter named Rita is investigating a story where she comes to know from officials and investigating that in a murder of a woman the ex-husband is the prime suspect .
In reality, Rita hasn't yet been told that their ex-husband has been cleared out by the police. The ex-husband loses his job the following day, his new wife moves out, and his friends no longer want to speak with him.
According to the definition of absolute privilege, the speaker has the full authority to say whatever they choose, at any time, even if it is defamatory. A similar thing is done by a reporter.
Therefore, option B is appropriate.
Learn more about defamation, here:
https://brainly.com/question/14233605
#SPJ2
Read the scenario. Samira is a freshman basketball player who hopes to go to college on a basketball scholarship. She is offered the chance to play on her school’s varsity basketball team, which plays in tournaments during holiday breaks. Samira usually spends her breaks working at the local hardware store. After careful consideration, Samira decides to stay on the freshman basketball team and keep working over breaks. The fact that Samira may miss out on a scholarship opportunity by staying on the freshman team illustrates
a. a cause.
b. minor consequences.
c. a tradeoff.
d. unexpected risk.
Answer:
The answer is C.
Who opened the 23rd canadian parliament the first monarch of canada to open a parliamentary session
Answer:
Queen Elizabeth II
Explanation:
It was the only parliament formally opened by Queen Elizabeth II herself, rather than her formal representative, the Governor General. It was controlled by a Progressive Conservative Party minority under Prime Minister John Diefenbaker and the 18th Canadian Ministry.
Answer:
It was opened by Queen Elizabeth the second
Explanation:
PLEASE GIVE BRAINLIEST
Robert is a manager at Beta Corp. Many of his colleagues mention that they find it very easy to work and communicate with Robert. They say that Robert is a very good listener and also communicates his thoughts effectively. He is sensitive to others' feelings and encourages them to express their opinions. It can be said from the scenario that Robert has good _____ skills.
Answer:
human skills
Explanation:
Human or interpersonal skills refer to the ability to interact, communicate and work with people. Therefore, these skills are promoted by employers, who consider human potential as a major factor that impacts on the employees' motivation and on business achievements. Therefore, Robert's relaxed and considerate personality makes his colleagues comfortable to convey their thoughts and views.
There is a fundamental ambiguity at the heart of psychological egoism.
A) This ambiguity involves the question of whether We are our brothers' keepers
B) We act selfishly or in our own self-interest
C) We have a right to government support when we fall on hard times
D) All of the above
Answer:
The right answer is option B “We act selfishly or in our own self-interest”
Explanation:
Psychological egoism is a theory that explains motivation with the focus of why or for what we do the actions. It says we always act selfishly. The problem in here is define if we actually act selfishly, or we just act in our own self-interest. The first one is based on that we only do things that are in our sincere self-interest, because people are unconsciously selfish and naturally we always tend to do things that benefits us. The second one is based on our intentions, instead of asking why we do it, we should as to whom, in fact the answer will be always ourselves, acting selfishly.
Answer:
The correct answer is Option B
Explanation:
The theory of psychological egoism suggests that all our actions are results of our own interest.
However the haziness prevails between two behavioral aspects. They are the activities which we perform is mainly of being selfish or to satisfy our own self-interest.
Sometimes we may get positive output for our actions. Does it mean that we have performed the action in order to get a positive outcome? Hence motives and consequences differ even though we perform an action out of self-interest. So, Psychological egoism is known to be partially true.
Actors who imitate different actors (with the acting emanating not from inside the actor but from the instructional process that includes formal analysis, technical lessons, drills and the imitation of teachers, well-known actors and/or other students) are engaged in which type of acting
Answer: the type of acting is called Presentational acting.
Explanation: Presentational acting is when actors imitate other actors with the acting emanating not from inside the actor but for teaching purposes.
Krystal's boss in the accounting department initially rejected her proposal for a new budgeting process. So Krystal spoke to and received support from the heads of two other departments that would benefit from the proposed budgeting process. She also found support from several co-workers in the accounting department because they believed the new budgeting process would be simpler and fairer. When Krystal's boss realized that several key people supported the new budgeting system, he agreed to test it in a pilot project. What form of influence is Krystal mainly using here?
A. Silent authority
B.Coalition formation
C. Assertiveness
D. Impression management
E. Ingratiation
Answer:
The correct answer would be option B, Coalition Formation.
Explanation:
Coalition formation is simply the actions exerted by the group of people which put influence or pressure over someone or some decision.
So in this example, Krystal proposed a budgeting process to her boss which he rejected, but Krystal thinks that her proposal was simpler and fairer, so she presented the proposal to the heads of other departments who could get benefit from her new budgeting process proposal. They liked her proposal very much. Also some co workers liked her simple and fair budgeting process proposal. So here a group of people arose which was in favor of the new proposed process. When her boss came to know about it, he agreed to test her proposal in a pilot project. So this act of likeness by the key personnel of the company influence the behavior of the boss. Key personnel here act as the coalition. So Krystal used the Coalition formation of influence here.
Krystal used coalition formation to influence her boss by gaining support from other department heads and colleagues, persuading her boss to reconsider her proposal. So, option B is correct.
In the scenario described, Krystal is using coalition formation as her main form of influence. This tactic involves building a support base and using the collective power of the group to persuade someone to think, feel, or do something. Krystal did this by getting the support of other department heads and her colleagues before approaching her boss again, which eventually led to the acceptance of her proposal.
Which of the following are core capabilities for response? A. Identity verification; interdiction and disruption; and long-term vulnerability reduction B. Fire management and suppression; fatality management services; and environmental response/health and safety C. Supply chain integrity and security; risk and disaster resilience assessment; and infrastructure systems D. Housing; forensics and attribution; and screening, search, and detection
Answering the question, the core capabilities for response are Fire Management and suppression; fatality management services; and environmental response/health and safety. This implies the correct answer is B
Further ExplanationFire management and suppression ensure structural and viable firefighting capabilities to control any types of fire accidents and also to ensure that the lives and properties of the public including the environment are well protected.
The mission area of fire management and suppression is response and they are meant to deal with fires of all types and complexities and also to provide adequate protection for the people in the community where the incident occurred.
The fatality management services are meant to provide help in the area of identifying victims and also to work with government such as state, local and federal to provide mortuary processes and are also meant to share information about any victim with the mass care services.
Sharing victim information with the mass care services is very vital as it will help to unify the family of the victims. Part of their core responsibilities is also to provide adequate counseling to the family of the victims. The mission area of the fatality management services is response
The core responsibilities of the Environmental response/health and safety are to conduct proper measure and ensure the lives and safety of other people in the affected communities is well protected.
The mission area of the Environmental response/health and safety is also Response
LEARN MORE:
Which of the following are core capabilities for response? https://brainly.com/question/11679917Which of the following are core capabilities for response? https://brainly.com/question/13177166KEYWORDS:
core capabilitiesfire managementenvironmental responsesafetyfatality managementAmong the options provided, fire management and suppression; fatality management services; and environmental response/health and safety are recognized as core response capabilities according to FEMA guidelines. These ensure effective protection and response to emergencies.
Explanation:The core capabilities for response usually refer to the abilities that organizations or systems have to effectively respond to emergencies, disasters, or crisis conditions. Among the options given, option B: 'Fire management and suppression; fatality management services; and environmental response/health and safety' are recognized as core response capabilities. These are elements within the National Preparedness Goal's Core Capabilities for Response as outlined by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). These capacities ensure that a community or system can adequately protect itself and respond effectively to reduce the loss of life and quickly stabilize the incident.
Learn more about Core Response Capabilities here:https://brainly.com/question/30165933
#SPJ6
Which prophet did god instruct to eat a scroll?
Hello.
The prophet god told to eat a scroll was Ezekiel.
This was because you are what you eat.
Congress enacted a statute that purported to ban all discrimination against African-Americans in any commercial transaction taking place within the United States.Would the statute most likely be held constitutional?A Yes, under Thirteenth Amendment provisions barring badges or incidents of slavery.B Yes, because the federal government has an important interest in furthering the equal protection provisions of the Fourteenth Amendment.C No, because Congress's powers under the Commerce Clause do not extend so far as the statute would require.D No, because commercial transactions are not among the privileges or immunities of national citizenship.
Answer:
B. Yes, because the federal government has an important interest in furthering the equal protection provisions of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Explanation:
Section 1 of the 14th Amendment gives U.S. citizenship to people born or naturalized in the U.S, protects their privileges or immunities and guarantees due process of law and the equal protection of the laws with the purpose to make it illegal to discriminate against a person because of race.
Therefore, if Congress enacts a statute that purports to ban all discrimination against African-Americans in any commercial transaction within the United States, it does so to further the equal protection provision of the Fourteenth Amendment that prohibits racial discrimination especially discrimination against African Americans which is a group that was widely discriminated for decades.
The case of a young girl named Genie is the most carefully documented and well-studied instance of what happens to a child who does not experience adequate contact with other people during infancy and childhood. Genie was locked in a room alone for nearly 13 years and never developed language skills the way most children do. Obviously, this is a story in part of severe parental neglect, but it also provides insight into whether abilities like language are innate. Fundamentally, this case about a feral child is about whether....
Answer: Fundamentally, this case about a feral child is about whether biology or socialization shapes human behaviour.
Explanation:
The nature vs nurture long debate involves the extent to which particular traits in an individual are inherited (genetically) or acquired (influence from other people or society).
A recent news story reported that when a newly engaged woman gave some change to a homeless man, her ring fell into his coin jar. After he proceeded to return it. he received a large sum of money in donations from people touched by the story. This is an example of
Answer:
Just-world hypothesis
Explanation:
Just-world hypothesis is an assumption that belie that everything that happen in people's live is a direct consequences of their own action (If that people is doing good, those people will somehow be rewarded. If that people is doing bad, those people will somehow punished). This assumption is what probably influence the people to donate to the homeless man.
Sarah, a stay-at-home mother of four, describes one of her learning patterns. I love to find new ways to complete tasks at home. It is okay to fail and make mistakes as long as you learn from them. With four children, it feels like I am always cooking. I have many recipes and while many follow the directions, I enjoy adding or substituting ingredients. I love to think outside of the box and find ways to make a recipe healthier! What Learning Pattern best fits Sarahâs description above?
Answer
The learning pattern which is described in the behavior of Sarah known as Confluence pattern of learning. It applies to the pattern which outlines the process in which we utilize our intelligence, take initiative, opportunities and brainstorming techniques of advancing things in a unique manner.
Explanation
Learning patterns are a easy approach to document an essential lesson. They demonstrate how to generate a strong approach for administering or assessing an action, such as operating an edit-a-thon, or the way to conduct survey. A learning pattern is imagined as a consistent combination of learning actions that individuals ordinarily employ their beliefs about knowledge and their learning motivation, as a complex that is representative of them for a specific duration. Confluence learning pattern enables the scholar to combine diverse pieces of knowledge into the “big picture.”
Further explanation
Learning is a demonstration of various elements of individual anatomy and human nature. Data obtained through the five sensations which are known as vision, sound, flavor, touching, and smell is electronically concocted, classified, and deposited in the mind. In any furnished moment, those five senses are presenting the brain with millions of unique bits of knowledge that can produce both intentional and oblivious responses.
The key to deliberate knowledge is a memory. Memory is a substantial phenomenon that is influenced by physiological factors such as anxiety and working of chemical receptors. In simplistic terms, we can contemplate the mind as the hard-drive of human existence. The Interactive Learning Model accommodates both a structure for learning explicit barriers to individual learning and a logical explanation for why this program has significance.
The Interactive Learning Model symbolizes that at the point when data is processed utilizing varying levels it develops the four interactive forms of growth and learning: sequence, accuracy, scientific reasoning, and confluence. These four noticeable patterns substantiate themselves not only in our thinking but our feelings and conation actions as well.
The individual who applies the Confluent pattern on a First basis conduces to circumvent traditional procedures, explores alternative methods to accomplish responsibilities, usually starts before learning all the directions, and extemporizes.
Keywords
Confluence pattern , brainstorm techniques, circumvent traditional procedures
Learn More
Confluence learning https://brainly.com/question/1362549
The learning pattern displayed by Sarah in the above example is confluence learning.
Further explanation:
Confluence learning patterns is a type of learning pattern of four types of learning patterns i.e,
Sequential learning Precision learningTechnical reasoningConfluent learning.Sequential learning pattern is characterized by following a step by step process to obtain an outcome and having defined directions or instructions
Precision learning pattern is characterized by gaining accurate information by questioning in order to avoid mistakes and playing it safe
Technical learning pattern is characterized by individual and independent reasoning and real world problem solving that is aimed at finding appropriate solutions for a problem.
Confluent learning is characterized by risk taking, a need to include a personal touch and relying on creativity. A person with confluent learning pattern tries to avoid using conventional methods or ways to do things. He or she always seeks out alternative ways to do things and learn them.
Sarah, here demonstrates confluential learning pattern by being ready to make mistakes, trying different methods and thinking creatively to obtain results.
Learn more:
Name and explain two personal values and two skills that can assist you in overcoming barriers regarding risky behavior. https://brainly.com/question/4924229Explain three possible feelings or thoughts that a person who has been subjected to violent crime may have . https://brainly.com/question/1609123Answer Details:
Grade: College Psychology
Subject: Psychology
Chapter: Learning patterns
Keywords: learning, learning pattern, confluent learning, out-of-the box thinking, risk taking, creativity, values, precision, reasoning, word problem.
Tammy witnessed a hit-and-run accident. She saw the license plate of the car that fled the scene. She tried to keep it in memory by repeating the sequence of digits and letters to herself until she could find a pen and paper to write it down. Tammy relied on which kind of memory?
Answer: Short-term memory
Explanation:
Short-term memory is referred to as a type of memory which keeps brief or short information temporarily. Information which an individual is presently thinking of can be remembered for a short period of time and it is always limited. Furthermore, information kept in short term memory can also be recalled through subvocal repetition. It is also called active memory. Thus, its time span is in seconds.
Tammy relied on short term memory.