The colonists believed that the power of the government should come from___.
Writers of The Declaration of Independence
The president
The Magna Carta
The people
up until the great depression everyone believed that the power of the goverment's power should come from the people
---the people---
The colonists believed that the source of governmental power should come from the people, a principle stemming from the philosophy of popular sovereignty.
Explanation:The colonists believed that the power of the government should come from the people. This concept is derived from the political philosophy of popular sovereignty, which means government is created by and subject to the will of the people. This belief can be traced back to Enlightenment thinkers like John Locke, and it is one of the foundations of democratic government systems.
In this context, the people should be the source of any legitimate governmental power and is reflected in the Declaration of Independence when it states: 'That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed'. Hence, it was the will and consent of the people that gave government its power and authority.
Learn more about Popular sovereignty here:
https://brainly.com/question/2590759
#SPJ2
At the First Continental Congress, what significant action did delegates take against the British? A)They called for a boycott of all British imports. B)They introduced the Coercive Acts. C)They drafted the Declaration of Independence. D)They formed the Sons of Liberty to protest the Stamp Act.
Your answer will be... A because At the First Continental Congress, the delegates discussed boycotting British goods all with each other, but decided to send the Crown a list of their grievances in the hopes of getting the Acts were established.
Answer:
The correct answer is A. At the First Continental Congress, it was decided to call for a boycott of all British imports.
Explanation:
On September 5, 1774, representatives of the assemblies of the colonies met in Philadelphia. The dilemma facing Congress was not simple because it had to show firmness before the British Government and, in turn, had to curb the independence wishes of the Sons of Liberty, which alarmed the conservative sectors, more likely to reach an agreement with the Crown.
Congress passed a Declaration of Rights and Grievances addressed to the people of Great Britain and the colonies, and also approved a petition to the king. Both documents recognized Parliament's right to regulate foreign trade but defended the right of the colonies to manage their own internal affairs without the intervention of the imperial government.
It was also decided to declare a trade boycott against the metropolis. Starting December 1, 1774, both the purchase of English goods and the sale of American goods to the British were prohibited. This decision was a response to the blockade of Boston by the English fleet. It was also decided to convene a second Continental Congress on May 10, 1775.
1.3.3 Quiz: Primary and Secondary Sources on Apex
Imagine you were reading an articular describing the national archives' goals to reduce its energy use. This article was published by the National Archives on its official website in 2013. Why would this source be considered reliable and credible?
A. The author is probably an expert in the field of alternative energy use.
B. The tone of the description is positive, and it was published on the internet.
C. The national archives is a government agency and therefore not biased.
D. The information comes from a reliable source, and the date of publication is recent.
The correct answer is answer D, "The information comes from a reliable source, and the date of publication is recent."
No source is truly unbiased, but we can however find credibility in the serious character of an article that comes from an official entity such as a government agency. Now that we have our reliable source, a good way to insure the information will be accurate is to check for the publication date. The more recent it is, the more certainty we have of its current relevancy.
Hope this clears things up!
Why would the existence of spheres of influence threaten the United States' goals in China? Check all of the boxes that apply. The Chinese government was too strong for the United States to influence. The United States would have trouble trading with China if other countries controlled Chinese trade. The United States would have little influence if China was already divided into areas of foreign control. China was too busy fighting European nations to trade with the United States.
The correct answers:
The United States would have trouble trading with China if other countries controlled Chinese trade. The United States would have little influence if China was already divided into areas of foreign control.The Open Door policy aimed at assuring the United States had equal access to trade in China. The Open Door policy was issued by the United States in 1899-1900 as a series of dispatches from the US Secretary of State to other nations that had trading interests in China -- Great Britain, Germany, France, Italy, Japan, and Russia. The policy reasserted earlier agreements that all countries should have equal access to ports in China, with no favored "spheres of influence" for one nation or another. The United States was seeking to maintain an equal footing with other nations in the access to trade in China.
Answer:
b,c The United States would have trouble trading with China if other countries controlled Chinese trade.
The United States would have little influence if China was already divided into areas of foreign control.
Explanation:
on edgy
Which of these BEST describes the purpose of the Alien and Sedition Acts? A) They prevented people from becoming citizens of the United States. B) They provided a means to safely protect the country from French invasion. C) They were meant to punish the Federalists who supported the National Bank. D) They were aimed at people who were criticizing President Adams' foreign policy.
Answer:
D) They were aimed at people who were criticizing President Adams' foreign policy.
Explanation:
i just took the test.
Answer:
the correct answer is D. D) They were aimed at people who were criticizing President Adams' foreign policy.
Explanation:
The Alien and Sedition Acts were aimed at people who were criticizing President Adams' foreign policy. John Adams and other Federalists were concerned that the unrest in France- and the additional unrest caused by the revolution there- might spread to the United States. The Alien Act gave the government the right to deport any alien- without due process- considered dangerous to the peace of the country. The Sedition Act made it a crime to criticize government officials.
Differences between the Catholic expression of Baroque and the Protestant expression of Baroque?
In 1517, more specifically October 31th, there was a break within the Church. Martin Luther (a German Augustinian monk), started the Protestant Revolution, by nailing a 95 point manifest on the door of Wittenberg Cathedral, in response to Pope Leo X decision to sell indulgences.
The main difference between their art style is what they wanted to convey with it.
Protestants focus on the relationship that people have with God, on a daily basis. It is a humbler approach to religion, showing that God's creation is beautiful as well and must be respected. Catholic concepts such as Saints, the Immaculate Conception, the Transfiguration of Christ, depictions of the Pope, were left aside. Reason for this was that Protestants believed that salvation, is only a matter of God.
Examples of this doctrine are: The Milkmaid by Jan Vermeer (1657); Woman holding a balance by Johannes Vermeer (1665).
On the other hand, Catholics launched the Catholic Counter-Reformation Art, by the Council of Trent in 1563, to further differentiate Catholicism and Protestantism. The goal was to minimize the Protestant Revolution
Their style was based in the mysteries of the Faith, which included the Virgin Mary, Saints, Transubstantiation, Cruxification, etc. Intense spiritualism and a clear message that ordinary people could understand was also a characteristic of Catholic Baroque.
One of its greatest exponents was Caravaggio (painter). Examples of his paintings are: The Entombment of Christ (1601-3); St. Matthew and the Angel (1602)
Given that his presidency was so brief and he was not able to fulfill many of his promises, why did kennedy’s presidency have such a large impact on the country? Give your opinion by answering the question in 2-3 sentences.
Kennedy inspired Americans to serve their country in different ways.
Kennedy inspired hope and optimism.
Kennedy began important programs in civil rights and space exploration.
John F. Kennedy's presidency had a large impact on the country because of his charisma, his vision for the future, and his tragic death. Kennedy was a very charismatic leader, and he was able to inspire people with his speeches and his optimism.
He had a clear vision for the future of the country, and he was able to articulate this vision in a way that resonated with people. Kennedy's death was also a major event that shocked the nation and made people realize the importance of his leadership.
In addition to these factors, Kennedy also made some significant accomplishments during his presidency, including the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Nuclear Test Ban Treaty of 1963. These accomplishments helped to shape the course of the country for years to come.
Overall, Kennedy's presidency was a short one, but it had a major impact on the country. He was a charismatic leader with a clear vision for the future, and his tragic death made people realize the importance of his leadership. His accomplishments also helped to shape the course of the country for years to come.
To know more about John F. Kennedy:
https://brainly.com/question/13721861
#SPJ4
How could Roosevelt have used the Monroe Doctrine to justify US involvement in the Venezuelan crisis and in Santo Domingo?
Answer:
Roosevelt utilized the Doctrine of Monroe, a party that was started in 1800. The part opposed the colonialism of the Europeans in America. It, therefore, added Roosevelt in earlier 1900. The doctrine states that the US was free to exercise the power of international police. This was aimed to justify American intervention in other countries.
Roosevelt having been considered as progressive, he pushed for reforms that saw industries established and worked towards making American to acquire power and rule all the states.
Roosevelt could have used the Monroe Doctrine to justify US involvement in the Venezuelan crisis and in Santo Domingo by:
The part that said no European country was allowed to colonise any country in the Western HemisphereAccording to the Monroe Doctrine which was put in place during the independence of the United States of America was against colonialism against countries in the Western Hemisphere by Europeans with the threat of military action.
As a result of this, President Theodore Roosevelt could have used this doctrine to intervene in the Venezuelan crisis and Santo Domingo as this was justifiable grounds to intervene.
Read more here:
https://brainly.com/question/1808198
30 POINTS!! DO NOT COPY & PASTE OR I WILL REPORT! WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST TO THE BEST ANSWER!!!
1) Greek and Roman legacies to the modern world include contributions to modern law and government. Briefly describe how modern law and government have been influenced by classical Greece and Rome. Include at least two examples from the Greeks and two examples from the Romans.
2) What caused the Western Roman Empire to fall? There was no single cause, and no sudden fall. Rome’s decline took place over many years, and was the result of many factors. Write a short essay that briefly describes the factors that led to the decline and fall of the Western Roman Empire.
Actually this is really a weird situation. When Roman law was in it's developing stages, there was a lot of wrangling about what to do. The law evolved in 2 very important steps.
1. This is very important. About the 5th century BC, it was thought best to write the laws down. That way a magistrate would be bound by what the law said, as would every other magistrate. The starting point would be the same for everyone. That meant that if someone deviated from what was written, there was a written reference. Everyone had the same written reference. And appeals could be based on the written Roman Law. So codification of the law belongs to both Rome and Greece, but mostly Rome.
Rome did contribute one thing (but they got part of that from the Greeks). When they got around to codifying the law, the made it into a science of sorts. The Greeks didn't do that. But the idea of what the scientific method was, came from Greece.
So far what you see is Rome "borrowing" an idea from Greece and adding to it.
2. Guess where they stole the model for the 12 tables from? (this is the Roman version of the law). That's right, another thing stolen from Greece. Not just Athens. There were many cities that received Romans seeking models of the law. This last comment is disputed a bit by modern historians. They do not believe that Rome would send her noble class all over conquered Greece to get information. The historians of the time, thought that was the way it happened. I'll go with the people who were actually there. Roman historians for me.
In Government, I think your first and most promising answer is democracy developed in Athens. Who could speak and under what circumstances, and when debate was ended are all complex issues. The Romans preferred a Republican model. Let the upper classes do the ruling, but if you were a member of the senate, you could speak openly and have any opinion and defend it until debate ended. I'm not sure how the end of a debate was decided. I have the impression that one of the strongest points the Romans had was their tolerance. You could believe anything you wanted as long as it did not interfere with government. Even Jesus recognized this as a virtue. Do you remember what he said about the Roman Coin when asked? He said ‶Give unto Rome what is Rome's, and give unto God what is His.″ That's really amazing when you think about it.
Greece had the same open door policy, I think, or at least Athens did. Athens tolerated all sorts of governments to flourish, religions as well . As far as I know (check this) she never went to war with either Sparta or Thebes and if she did, it wasn't over their form of government, which was quite different.
Two
I have read all sorts of reasons for the fall of the Roman Empire. Realize that you are talking about an institution that stayed in power for about 1000 years. Who has matched that?
Everything is possible. Everything. One scholar believes it was lead in the pipes transporting the water was the cause. Another believes that the Goths (and their ‶cousins″ could not be defended against. Another thought it was because the army was paid in debased currency. Still another thought it might be the debasement of their currency. I like the possibility that the empire was split in 2 by Constatine which allowed the Eastern Empire to remain for many many years. Still others thought it was corruption that ended the integrety of the of the ruling classes. I don't know what you are going to pick.
There are all sorts of reasons offered from psychological to physical to military, and it really does depend on what period you begin with and where you think it all ended.
https://brainly.com/question/11242487
Why were the colonists so angry over these taxes?
Most Egyptians do not believe in the afterlife and focused on only life here and now true or false
The statement is - False.
The Egyptians, from all types of social status, were believing that there are two lives, one is here on the Earth, and the other is up in the sky with the Gods, the afterlife. They took this very seriously, and it was extremely important for them to respect the Gods and how they live in their first life on the Earth, in order to manage to get a better place and respectable place in the afterlife.
can someone please answer these questions that go with the following cartoon!
According to this cartoon, what fire is spreading over the island of Cuba?
According to this cartoon, what are the two groups in Cuba who are creating/ fanning the flames of this fire?
According to the caption under this cartoon, what is the duty of the hour for the United States?
What do you think the cartoonist wanted viewers to walk away from the cartoon thinking about or feeling?
According to the cartoon, the fire of anarchy is spreading over Cuba.
The two groups creating/fanning the flames are the Cubans loyal to the Spanish rule and the Cuban independentists.
The duty of the hour for the United States is not only liberate Cuba from the Spanish rule but from a worse fate than that one.
This cartoon is most likely from the Spanish/United States war of 1898. During this war, the American army faced the Spanish army to help the Cubans obtain their independence. The cartoonist wanted the viewer to support the war as a fight for liberty, because the United States interference in this foreign affair was controversial.
Based on the details in the cartoon, the following are true:
The fire of anarchy. Cuban insurgents (loyal to Spain) and Cuban autonomists (independence fighters).To save Cuba from Spanish rule and to save Cuba from a worse faith. To feel like it was important that the United States offer help to Cuba. What does the painting say?The painting is about the Cuban Revolution which saw Cubans loyal to Spain fighting those who wanted independence. The conflict led to American businesses suffering.
This led to the many campaigning for the U.S to intervene in Cuba and one way they used to convince people was that Cuba was in a state of anarchy and the U.S. needed to save it.
Find out more on the Cuban Revolution at https://brainly.com/question/16440373.
Which is an example of due process?
passing a new law
obtaining a search warrant
attending classes in school
resolving a dispute
Answer:
B. obtaining a search warrant
Explanation:
Due process is a requirement that legal matters be resolved according to established rules and principles, and that individuals be treated fairly. Due process applies to both civil and criminal matters.
An example of a due process from the options listed is : ( B ) Obtaining a search warrant
What is a due process ?Due process is the course or process followed during formal proceedings. and it is carried following a set of established rules and principles. In order to search a building or personal belongings the first step is to obtain a search warrant from a competent court.
Hence we can conclude that An example of a due process from the options listed is : ( B ) Obtaining a search warrant
Learn more about due process : https://brainly.com/question/711394
#SPJ2
Choose all that apply.
What group(s) hold claim to Palestine?
the Jews
the Romans
the Arabs
the Assyrians
Answer:
Jews and arabs held claim to the land.
Explanation:
Jews and Arabs
Hopes this helps
XD
Why do some Kyrgyz and Kazakhs look asian I thought they were all muslim?
Both, the Kazakhs and Kyrgyz are people from the Turkic group of people. The Turkic people differ in appearance from region to region, and we have some that resemble more of East Asians, some of Iranians, and some of Caucasians. The Kazakhs and Kyrgys have a very similar appearance wuth the East Asians, and this is due to the bigger genetic influence from the Mongols during the Middle Ages. The Turkic people originally had partially East Asian appearance, and the Mongol influence just made it more apparent in this two ethnic groups.
"I know that the acquisition of Louisiana has been disapproved by some ... that the enlargement of our territory would endanger its union... The larger our association the less will it be shaken by local passions; and in any view is it not better that the opposite bank of the Mississippi should be settled by our own brethren and children than by strangers of another family?"- Thomas Jefferson
Which of the following is NOT a reason Jefferson decided to purchase the Louisiana Territory? Question 1 options: A.The purchase aligned with his strict constructionist views. B. Prevent a foreign nation from buying the territory
C.Would gain control of the Port of New Orleans and Mississippi River D. It would double the size of the US
NOT a reason Jefferson decided to purchase the Louisiana Territory: A. The purchase aligned with his strict constructionist views.
Explanation/context:
Jefferson was uncertain as to whether he had constitutional authority to accept the treaty. Thomas Jefferson was a "strict constructionist." In other words, he believed that we ought only do what is strictly outlined in the Constitution. Loose constructionists, by contrast, believed that we are free to take an action if that action is not specifically prohibited by the Constitution. Because of Jefferson's views on how to interpret and abide by the Constitution, it's no surprise that he had some hesitancy about proceeding with the Louisiana Purchase. He thought the matter should be brought to the American people for them to approve a constitutional amendment. However, others in government didn't view the matter the same way, and eventually the treaty was ratified.
The treaty, as negotiated by James Monroe and Robert Livingston on behalf of the USA, was announced on July 4, 1803. The Senate ratified the treaty in October, 1803, after disregarding President Jefferson's draft for an amendment to the Constitution.
Ultimately, Jefferson was convinced by others in his administration. In a statement he made at the time, Jefferson justified the purchase with this analogy: "“It is the case of a guardian, investing the money of his ward in purchasing an important adjacent territory; and saying to him when of age, I did this for your good."
The reason that is NOT a reason why Jefferson decided to purchase the Louisiana Territory is option A: 'The purchase aligned with his strict constructionist views'. Jefferson made the purchase more from practical and diplomatic needs rather than strictly adhering to his strict constructionist philosophies.
Explanation:The incorrect statement or the reason that is NOT a reason why Jefferson decided to purchase the Louisiana Territory is option A: 'The purchase aligned with his strict constructionist views'. Thomas Jefferson was indeed a strict constructionist, meaning he believed in a narrow interpretation of the Constitution's granting of powers to the federal government. However, the Louisiana Purchase was more related to his practical and diplomatic needs rather than his strict constructionist views. The other options all are valid reasons why Jefferson decided to purchase the territory. Namely, to prevent a foreign nation from gaining control (Option B), to secure control of the Port of New Orleans and the Mississippi River for commerce (Option C), and to double the size of the United States (Option D).
Learn more about Louisiana Purchase here:https://brainly.com/question/29760168
#SPJ3
Choose all the statements that do NOT describe a characteristic of Jacksonian democracy
The correct answers are:
The abolition of slavery in the United States.
The founding of the Republican Party.
Jackson was not in favor of getting rid of slavery. His belief in a small federal government and states rights allowed for slavery to continue in the United States.
Along with this, Jackson was a Democrat, not a Republican. All of the other statements about Jackson are true.
Jacksonian democracy aimed to extend political power to the common man, reduce the influence of the elite, and expand economic opportunities. It did not support increased political power for wealthy landowners, opposed the expansion of individual rights, and sought to limit the power of the federal government.
To identify the statements that do NOT describe a characteristic of Jacksonian democracy, we need to understand what Jacksonian democracy is. Jacksonian democracy refers to the political movement during the presidency of Andrew Jackson (1829-1837) in the United States. It aimed to extend political power to the common man, emphasizing the importance of white male suffrage, reducing the influence of the elite, and supporting the expansion of economic opportunities.
Therefore, the statements that do NOT describe a characteristic of Jacksonian democracy would be:
Increased political power for wealthy landowners: Jacksonian democracy sought to reduce the influence of the elite and redistribute political power to the common man, not concentrate it in the hands of wealthy landowners.
Opposition to the expansion of individual rights: Jacksonian democracy fought for the expansion of individual rights and the removal of property ownership as a qualification for voting.
Increase in the power of the federal government: Jacksonian democracy actually sought to limit the power of the federal government and uphold states' rights.
Learn more about Jacksonian democracy
https://brainly.com/question/795956
#SPJ3
How was a Propriety Colony governed in Maryland?
A.The King's son was appointed governor.
B. The King directly ruled the colony from England.
C.Charles I granted George Calvert the position of Lord Baltimore.
D.Lord Baltimore took the land for Catholics without consulting the Charles I.
The correct answer is C.
Proprietary colonies were one of the types of British colonies established in North America. The owner of the land was the British King but, in order to focus on governing England, he transfers the power of governing a colony to one of his allies.
In the case of Maryland territories, he named George Calvert as the Lord of Baltimore. Anyway, the first colonial governor of Maryland was George's son, as George died 5 weeks before.
How did henry ford contrive to american education during this time
What affect do you think the spanish settlement had on native americans
What roles did colonies play in the global economy?
(Select all that apply.)
Colonies were new markets where merchants could sell their goods.
Colonies provided imperial powers with more culturally diverse citizens.
Colonies provided resources for making manufactured goods in industrialized countries.
Colonies established new travel destinations for Europeans.
Answer:
Colonies were new markets where merchants could sell their goods.
Colonies provided resources for making manufactured goods in industrialized countries.
Explanation:
Colonial exploitation was beneficial to the economy of the metropoles for two main reasons resulting from the Colonial Pact.
First, the colonial pact established that colonies could only buy products from their European metropole. Consequently, the colonies became new markets for the disposal of European products.
Second, the colonies became suppliers of natural resources that were exported to Europe to manufacture.
In the end, the process of import and export between European countries and colonies was beneficial to global GDP.
Answer:
b c d f
Explanation:
Which of the following is true about Christianity, Judaism, and Islam? All three religions use the Bible to instruct members in the faith. The followers of each religion discourage fasting as an act of worship. Each religion has groups within it that hold different beliefs. Members of each religion make a trip to the Holy Land once in their lifetime.
Out of the statements provided, the true one is that each religion has groups within it that hold different beliefs. Christianity, Judaism, and Islam are all monotheistic Abrahamic faiths with differences in practices, sacred texts, and interpretations within each religion.
Explanation:Among the choices given regarding Christianity, Judaism, and Islam, the statement that each religion has groups within it that hold different beliefs is true. All three religions are Abrahamic faiths, acknowledging Abraham as a significant patriarch, and they hold the concept of pilgrimage, but they have different practices and sacred texts. Islam, the youngest of the three, follows the Qur'an as its sacred text, while Christianity uses the Bible, and Judaism adheres to the Torah. While Islam includes the Hajj to Mecca as a once-in-a-lifetime pilgrimage, this is not a requirement in Christianity and Judaism.
Muslims believe that all three religions originated from the same monotheistic roots but diverged due to interpretations over time. The followers of these religions recognize the significance of prophets, with Muslims considering Muhammad as the final prophet. Each of these faiths has various sects or denominations, each with their own interpretations of beliefs, practices, and doctrine. For instance, Christianity has denominations like Catholic, Protestant, and Orthodox; Judaism is split into Orthodox, Conservative, and Reform branches; and Islam is divided into Sunni, Shia, and other sects.
Final answer:
All three religions, Christianity, Judaism, and Islam, have similarities and differences in their use of holy texts, fasting practices, diversity within the faiths, and pilgrimage.
Explanation:
All three religions, Christianity, Judaism, and Islam, have similarities and differences. They each have their own holy texts, with Christianity using the Bible, Judaism using the Torah, and Islam using the Qur'an. Fasting is actually practiced in all three religions as an act of worship, with Christianity and Judaism having specific fasting traditions, such as Lent and Yom Kippur, and Islam having the month-long fast of Ramadan. Each religion also has different groups within it that hold different beliefs, with different denominations and sects. Finally, Islam has the concept of pilgrimage to the Holy Land of Mecca, which is required of all Muslims who are able, while Christianity and Judaism do not have a specific pilgrimage requirement.
There are a number of Holocaust memorials around the world. There is a Holocaust memorial in Baltimore, MD, Washington D.C., and at several sites around Europe. For this assessment, you will be creating your own Holocaust multimedia presentation. You may choose a Web 2.0 tool to create your multimedia presentation. Holocaust Multimedia Presentation Before you create your presentation, remember that the Holocaust is an example of genocide. Your presentation should focus on the causes, events, and effects of the Holocaust. Your presentation must include: a title at least five photographs dealing with the causes, events, and effects of the Holocaust captions for each photograph that are a minimum of two sentences a one-paragraph summary that explains the impact or effects of the Holocaust on the Jewish population a two to three sentence "call to action" that explains what we can do in the world to prevent future genocides
Since civics includes the study of government, it has very little to do with one’s personal life. Please select the best answer from the choices provided T F
the correct answer is False
Which of these has the least effect on late 19 century american industrialization
I guess you have forgotten to leave the options to choose from. Is the abolition movement among possible answers?
what were two reasons for downfall of the new kingdom
a.weak pharaohs
b.famine
c.war
d.greed
A. and C. It is said that after Akhenaten and Ramses, the pharaohs became extremely weak (given the exception that Akenaten was considerably weak himself). Therefore, various enemies were able to easily attack Egypt until Rome finally conquered the country and it fell under their rule.
Answer:
A : Weak Pahraohs
C: War
Explanation:
Fall of the New Kingdom
It was during the reign of Ramesses III that the powerful Egyptian Empire began to weaken. Ramesses III had to fight many battles including an invasion by the Sea Peoples and tribesmen from Libya. These wars, combined with severe drought and famine, caused unrest throughout Egypt. In the years after Ramesses III died, internal corruption and infighting in the central government became worse. The last pharaoh of the New Kingdom was Ramesses XI. After his reign, Egypt was no longer united and the Third Intermediate Period began.
SOURCE :
Read more at: https://www.ducksters.com/history/ancient_egypt/new_kingdom.php
This text is Copyright © Ducksters. Do not use without permission.
Thank You
How did adolf hitler persecution of jews help the nazi party secure power in germany
Adolf Hilter played on the 'fear of Others'
Adolf Hitler was consolidating his power during a time of economic depression in Germany. People were looking to blame foreign powers and many 'minorities' in the country.
Hitler used his propaganda machine to spread messages of how the minority Jewish people were behind the ills of the country and how the jews had collabrated with the Allies before.
By Identifying a certain 'enemey' the Nazi party were able to rally a large population against a single enemy in the country.
This gave a sense of purpose and direction to a country where most people were unhappy.
how close did the new nation come to ending slavery
Which of these features is part of Athenian government? Check all that apply.
1. The government is a direct democracy.
2. The military is an important part of government.
3. Two kings are also the head generals.
4. The assembly is the main body of government.
5. Debate is an important part of government.
In Athenas, 1. The government is a direct democracy, 4. The assembly is the main body of government and 5. Debate is an important part of government.
Athenian government features included direct democracy, the Assembly as the main governing body, and significant emphasis on debate. While the military was important, the concept of two kings leading as generals does not apply to Athens.
The Athenian government in ancient Greece had several distinctive features. Among those features, we can confirm that the government is a direct democracy, the assembly is the main body of government, and debate is an important part of government. The citizens of Athens were actively involved in civic participation, voting rights were granted to male citizens, and legislative bodies, such as the Assembly and the Council of 500, were central to the democratic process. The military was indeed significant in Athens, but there were not two kings as head generals; instead, there were ten generals elected annually by the Assembly.
Tania is interested in buying a $135,000 home. How big does her down payment need to be in order to avoid PMI?
To avoid Primary Mortgage Insurance (PMI) ,you need to have the loan balance be 80% or less of the home value.Therefore,Tania needs to give a down payment of at least 20% of $135000
= 20/100 * 135000 = $27000
So Tania needs to pay $27000 down payment or more in order to avoid PMI( Primary Mortgage Insurance ).
Final answer:
Tania needs to make a down payment of $27,000, which is 20% of the $135,000 home price, to avoid PMI. PMI protects lenders from default and is an extra cost for buyers who put down less than 20%.
Explanation:
The question asks how big Tania's down payment needs to be in order to avoid Private Mortgage Insurance (PMI) when buying a $135,000 home. To avoid PMI, borrowers are generally required to make a down payment of at least 20% of the home's purchase price. In Tania's case, a 20% down payment on a $135,000 home would be:
$135,000 x 20% = $27,000.
Therefore, Tania would need to make a down payment of $27,000 to avoid paying for PMI. PMI is a type of insurance that protects the lender from the risk of default and foreclosure, and it's an additional cost for buyers who put down less than 20% of the home's price.