Amber and john had an argument over whose turn it was to do the dishes. in the heat of the argument, john calls amber a "slob" and she calls john a "self-centered moron." later, after they have made up, john tries to apologize to amber and to explain that he doesn't really think she's a slob. amber is still hurt and complains that no matter what john says now, he must have meant what he said. which principle of interpersonal communication is john experiencing?

The answer would be C. advocates for deaf education.

All of those individuals supposed that dead incapacitated people had a big potential nothing like what the people in the public believe, they made schools for the deaf. They were amid the first one that used sign languages for teaching communication.

Thomas Hopkins Gallaudet, I. King Jordan, and Laurent Clerc are best known as advocates for deaf education, having contributed significantly to the establishment of educational institutions and methods for the deaf, and to self-governance within the deaf community.

Thomas Hopkins Gallaudet, I. King Jordan, and Laurent Clerc are best known for being advocates for deaf education. Gallaudet and Clerc were pivotal in the founding of the American School for the Deaf, the first institution of its kind in the U.S., in 1817 where they utilized sign language for teaching, which represented an innovative method in education for the deaf. Furthermore, the significant Deaf President Now Movement at Gallaudet University led to the appointment of I. King Jordan as the first deaf president of the university, marking an important milestone in the history of efforts towards self-governance by the deaf community.

Catatanoia schizophrenia involves variations in voluntary movement and waxy flexibility

Catatanoia is defined as the form of the anomalous neuropsychiatric condition that is adding the influence related with the motor form of capacity and also about the behavior. It is resulting into the lethargy who somehow give away the impression of being too much alert. You can make it connect with some psychological issue too.

Genetic mutation was the cause of the variations. Individuals 1 and 2 are beneficial, whereas 3 is detrimental.

Individuals' DNA genetic sequences differ greatly from one another. DNA variations refers to all of these changes as a group. When a DNA variation lacks obvious functional importance, it is referred to as a DNA polymorphism.

A polymorphism is typically defined as a change in DNA sequence that affects less than 1% of the population. The majority of polymorphisms won't directly alter gene activity because protein-coding gene sequences only make up around 1-2% of the human genome, yet a variation found in a regulatory region of the genome may have functional ramifications.

A protein's amino acid can change due to certain DNA variations. Even so, this may be considered a neutral version or if the altered amino acid does not affect how a protein functions, there is polymorphism.

While certain variants do not alter an amino acid, they can nevertheless affect how a gene functions by altering how certain genes are spliced. A change in an amino acid is referred to be a mutation if it alters how a protein or gene functions.

Learn more about DNA here

https://brainly.com/question/15867473

#SPJ2

This is called limited partnership. This exists when two or more associates unite to mutually make a business in which one or more of the associates is accountable only to the degree of the quantity of money that partner has capitalized. Limited partners do not obtain dividends, but revel in straight access to the movement of revenue and expenditures. 

As "Stimulus Discrimination".

In classical conditioning, discrimination is the capacity to separate between a conditioned stimulus and other stimuli that have not been combined with an unconditioned one. In the given example little Albert was conditioned to fear white rat and not the block of wood. The experiment was widely criticized due to the insensitivity showed towards little Albert.

According to Seligman, one factor that may contribute to victims staying in abusive relationships is learned helplessness.

This belief can lead to a state of helplessness, where the person does not attempt to escape or change their circumstances, even when opportunities to do so are available. In the context of domestic abuse, victims may experience learned helplessness after repeated instances of abuse, leading them to feel that they cannot leave the relationship or that their efforts to change the situation would be futile.

This psychological state can be a significant factor in why victims stay in abusive relationships despite the obvious harm to their well-being. Seligman's theory suggests that the abused individual has learned to be helpless and, as a result, may not take action to improve their situation or seek help.

Interventions aimed at increasing a sense of control and self-efficacy can be crucial in helping victims of domestic abuse to overcome learned helplessness and take steps towards leaving the abusive relationship.

Final answer:

Joanna could be best helped by a clinical psychologist, who can provide therapeutic interventions and support for severe mental health issues, including those contemplating sucide.

Explanation:

Joanna, who is experiencing a deep level of personal distress including the death of a family member, academic challenges, and a recent divorce, and is now contemplating sucide, would most likely benefit from the help of a clinical psychologist. Clinical psychologists are trained to work with individuals dealing with severe mental health issues, and they can offer therapeutic interventions, support through life skills and case management, and potentially refer clients for psychiatric evaluations or medication management if needed. Especially in cases where sucide is considered, immediate help from a healthcare professional is critical to provide the necessary support and intervention.

Margaret Mead studied gender in three societies in New Guinea and established that "what is known to be feminine in one society might be considered masculine in another one".

Born on December 16, 1901, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Social anthropologist and author Margaret Mead is recognized with altering the approach we examine diverse human societies.

Mead's fieldwork revealed that gender roles and behaviors are culturally constructed, with vast variation among the Arapesh, Mundugumor, and Tchambuli societies in New Guinea.

Margaret Mead's fieldwork in three societies in New Guinea highlighted that gender roles and behaviors can be culturally constructed rather than determined by biological differences. Mead's research among the Arapesh, Mundugumor, and Tchambuli (Chambri) societies revealed a wide spectrum of gender roles. In the Arapesh, both men and women were gentle and cooperative, whereas, in the Mundugumor, both genders were expected to be aggressive and competitive.

Conversely, among the Tchambuli, gender roles were reversed compared to Western expectations, with women being dominant and practical, and men being more emotionally dependent and engaging in beautification, often considered feminine by Western standards. This study broke new ground by identifying the fluid nature of gender roles and was a key contribution to our understanding of the cultural basis of gender differences. While some criticisms were levied against Mead's conclusions, further research by anthropologists has largely substantiated her observations.

The head of state in this scenario exhibits authoritarian rule.

An authoritarian ruler is in power when the head of government independently decides to limit citizens' freedom of speech and mandates attendance at events honoring themselves. This type of ruler centralizes authority and suppresses dissenting voices to maintain control.

The act of categorizing people based on gender could lead Jack to hold prescriptive stereotypes about certain skills, behaviors, and roles being gender-specific. For example, Jack might assume that care-related roles are suited for women and enforcement or political roles are for men. He might also react positively or negatively towards individuals based on their gender and how it aligns with his understanding.

The tendency to categorize people based on gender is a form of gender stereotyping. In Jack's case, he might be led to believe certain assumptions about people's skills, behaviors, and roles based on whether they are male or female. For instance, he might assume that women are more suited to childcare and healthcare roles, while men are likely to excel in law enforcement, military, and politics due to occupational sorting tendencies observed in society (Gerdeman 2019).

Moreover, Jack might also perceive certain behaviors as gender normative, like men being ambitious and assertive, while women who display the same traits could be deemed as selfish or overly competitive (Baldoni, 2020). The underlying issue here is prescriptive stereotypes, ideas that circumscribe how men and women should behave.

Furthermore, gender binarism, the belief that each person can be categorized as either male or female, might influence Jack's understanding of gender (Norlock 2019). He might hold positive or negative biases towards individuals based on their gender alignment and how it resonates with his own identification (Conroy, Martin, Nadler, 2020).

https://brainly.com/question/12566650

#SPJ3

The answer is "France".

Eleanor of Aquitaine was a standout among the most capable and compelling figures of the Medieval times. Acquiring an immense bequest at 15 years old made her the most looked for after bride of her age. She would in the end turn into the ruler of France, the ruler of Britain and lead a crusade to the Blessed Land. She is likewise credited with building up and safeguarding a significant number of the cultured customs of chivalry.