Answer:$4650
Explanation:
The cost that is recoverable is $30 per hour that was agreed as the hour to be spent in learning the soft ware. The sunk cost it's an irrecoverable cost that does influence decision making. When the agreed leaning cost of $30 per hr for 45hr of $1350 is deducted from the asking price of $6000 we have the $4650
In this business scenario, Initech asked for an additional $4,200 from Andrew after their initial agreement.
In this scenario, **Initech** asked for an additional $4,200 from Andrew after their initial agreement of $6,000. This additional request was based on the investments Andrew made, including the sunk capital investments of $1,800 and his time spent learning the software, valued at $1,350 (45 hours x $30 per hour).
Francisca and Garden Estate, Inc., enter into a contract for the use of a Victorian mansion and its grounds for a wedding and reception.
If ambiguities appear in the contract, they will be construed against the party who :
a. drafted the contract.
b. has the greater bargaining power.
c. made the offer to contract.
d. offers the most confusing explanation of the terms.
Answer:
The answer is letter A.
Explanation:
They will be construed agains the party who drafted the contract. However, this rule only applies where one contracting party is in a superior bargaining position, usually either as a result of greater experience or the assistance of counsel.
Andrew is saving up money for a down payment on a car. He currently has $5470, but knows he can get a loan at a lower interest rate if he can put down $6253. If he invests the $5470 in an account that earns 4.8% annually, compounded quarterly, how long will it take Andrew to accumulate the $6253? Round your answer to two decimal places, if necessary.
Answer:
2.79 quarters, so almost 3 quarters or 9 months
Explanation:
We write the equation, and solve it. To solve for x, as x is an exponent, we must use logarithms.
[tex]5,470(1+0.048)^{X} = 6,253\\(1.048)^{X} = \frac{6,253}{5,470} \\(1.048)^{X} = 1.14\\XLog1.048 = Log 1.14\\X = \frac{Log1.14}{Log 1.048} \\\\X = 2.79\\[/tex]
Final answer:
It will take Andrew approximately 4.36 years to accumulate $6253 by investing $5470 in an account that earns 4.8% annually, compounded quarterly.
Explanation:
To calculate how long it will take Andrew to accumulate $6253 by investing $5470 in an account that earns 4.8% annually, compounded quarterly, we can use the formula for compound interest:
A = P(1 + r/n)^(nt)
Where:
A = final amount ($6253)
P = principal amount ($5470)
r = annual interest rate (4.8% or 0.048)
n = number of times interest is compounded per year (4)
t = number of years
Plugging in the values: 6253 = 5470(1 + 0.048/4)^(4t)
Dividing both sides by 5470: 1.1433 = (1.012)^4t
Taking the logarithm of both sides to solve for t: 4t = log(1.1433)/log(1.012)
t = (log(1.1433)/log(1.012))/4
Using a calculator, we find that t is approximately 4.36 years. Therefore, it will take Andrew approximately 4.36 years to accumulate $6253.
You have been hired as the new controller for the Ralston Company. Shortly after joining the company in 2018, you discover the following errors related to the 2016 and 2017 financial statements: Inventory at 12/31/16 was understated by $6,800. Inventory at 12/31/17 was overstated by $9,800. On 12/31/17, inventory was purchased for $3,800. The company did not record the purchase until the inventory was paid for early in 2018. At that time, the purchase was recorded by a debit to purchases and a credit to cash. The company uses a periodic inventory system. Required: 1. Assuming that the errors were discovered after the 2017 financial statements were issued, analyze the effect of the errors on 2017 and 2016 cost of goods sold, net income, and retained earnings. (Ignore income taxes.) 2. Prepare a journal entry to correct the errors.
Inventory understatement in 2016 led to overstated COGS and understated net income and retained earnings. The opposite effect occurred in 2017 due to inventory overstatement and delay in recording a purchase. A journal entry in 2018 correcting these errors would debit Inventory and credit COGS/Purchases for the respective amounts.
Explanation:In 2016, an understatement of $6,800 in the inventory would have caused the Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) to be overstated and thus, the net income and retained earnings would have been understated. In 2017, the overstatement of $9,800 in inventory and the delay in recording the inventory purchase of $3,800 would have caused COGS to be understated and net income and retained earnings to be overstated. An understated COGS value will make the profit look higher than it actually is. To correct these errors a journal entry in 2018, would debit Inventory for $6,800 and $3,800 and credit COGS and Purchases respectively. Similarly, for the overstatement, a debit to COGS and a credit to Inventory for $9,800.
Learn more about Financial Statement Errors here:https://brainly.com/question/36699611
#SPJ3
: On 1/1/X1, Wolfpack Inc. issues 3-year bonds with a face value of $50,000 and a face (stated) rate of 4% compounded semi-annually. The market interest rate for bonds of similar risk and maturity is 5% compounded semi-annually. Interest is paid semi-annually on June 30 and December 31 beginning on June 30, 20X1. The bonds mature on 12/31/X3. A. What is the issue price of the bonds on 1/1/X1? Note to student: If you have trouble answering this question, go to the last page of this graded assignment where you will be asked a series of questions that, if answered correctly, should lead you to the correct answer. Answer: $__
Answer:
The issue price of the bond on 1/1/X1 is: $48,623.
Explanation:
We discounted the cash flow from the bond, comprising of the coupon stream and the principal repayment, at market return rate applied to other bond with similar risk and maturity to come up with the issue price of the bond.
We have: r = 5/2 = 2.5%; Semi-annual payment = 50,000 x 4%/2 = 1,000; n = 3 x 2 = 6
Thus Issue price = Present value of coupon stream + Present value of principal repayment = (1,000 / 2.5%) x [ 1 - (1+2.5%)^-6 ] + (50,000/1.025^-6) = $48,623.
Marginal revenue for a monopolist is computed as :
a. average revenue divided by quantity sold.
b. average revenue times quantity divided by price.
c. total revenue divided by quantity sold.
d. change in total revenue per one unit change in quantity sold.
Answer:
d. change in total revenue per one unit change in quantity sold.
Explanation:
A monopolist marginal revenue is change in total revenue per one unit change in quantity sold.
Average revenue is total revenue divided by quantity sold.
A monopolist is a firm that only exists in an industry.
I hope my answer helps you.
Lacy Construction has a noncontributory, defined benefit pension plan. At December 31, 2016, Lacy received the following information:Projected Benefit Obligation ($ in millions) Balance, January 1 $ 360 Service cost 60 Prior service cost 12 Interest cost(7.5%) 27 Benefits paid (37 ) Balance, December 31 $ 422 Plan Assets ($ in millions) Balance, January 1 $ 240 Actual return on plan assets 27 Contributions 2016 60 Benefits paid (37 ) Balance, December 31 $ 290 The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets was 10%. There were no AOCI balances related to pensions on January 1, 2016. At the end of 2016, Lacy amended the pension formula creating a prior service cost of $12 million.Required:1. Determine Lacy's pension expense for 2016.Pension Expense :
Answer:
$63
Explanation:
Lacy's pension expense for 2016:
= Service cost + Interest cost - Expected return on the plan assets + Amortization of prior service cost + Amortization of net gain or net loss—AOCI
= $60 + $27 - ($27 actual - $3 gain) + $0 + $0
= $60 + $27 - $24
= $63
Note:
Since the amendment was at the end of the year, there is no amortization of prior service cost in 2016.
Jand, Inc., currently pays a dividend of $1.38, which is expected to grow indefinitely at 5%. If the current value of Jand’s shares based on the constant-growth dividend discount model is $35.41, what is the required rate of return? (Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answer to 2 decimal places.)
Answer:
9.09%
Explanation:
Use Gordon growth model of stock valuation to find the required rate of return;
Price = D1/ (r-g)
this can also be written as [tex]\frac{D0(1+r)}{(r-g)}[/tex]
whereby,
Price = $35.41
D0 = Current dividend = 1.38
D1 = Next year's dividend = 1.38(1.05) = 1.449
g = growth rate = 5% or 0.05 as a decimal
r = required return = ?
Rewrite the formula "Price = D1/ (r-g) " to find r;
r = [tex]\frac{D1}{Price} +g[/tex]
r = [tex]\frac{1.449}{35.41} + 0.05\\ \\ =0.04092 +0.05\\ \\ =0.09092[/tex]
as a percentage, the required return = 9.09%
The required rate of return for Jand, Inc., using the constant-growth dividend discount model, is 8.89%. This is calculated by dividing the dividend of $1.38 by the current share price of $35.41 and adding the growth rate of 5%.
The student's question pertains to the calculation of the required rate of return using the constant-growth dividend discount model (DDM). The model uses the current dividend payment, the expected dividend growth rate, and the current stock price to determine the rate of return that investors would require to be willing to invest in the stock.
According to the DDM, the price of a share is calculated as:
Price = Dividend / (Required Rate of Return - Growth Rate)
Given that Jand, Inc., pays a dividend of $1.38, which is expected to grow indefinitely at 5%, and the current share price is $35.41, we can rearrange the formula to solve for the required rate of return:
Required Rate of Return = (Dividend / Price) + Growth Rate
To find the answer, plug in the values:
Required Rate of Return = (1.38 / 35.41) + 0.05
Required Rate of Return = 0.0389 + 0.05
Required Rate of Return = 0.0889 or 8.89% (rounded to two decimal places)
13. Roy, the owner of Standard Business Company (SBC), sells SBC to Tim for a note payable to Roy for $100,000. Tim does not pay the note and files for bankruptcy under Chapter 7. The debt represented by the note is b. dischargeable if $100,000 now seems to be a high price for SBC. d. dischargeable under any circumstances. a. not dischargeable if Tim concealed assets to defraud Roy. c. not dischargeable under any circumstances.
Answer:not dischargeable if Tim concealed asset to defraud Roy
Explanation:
A bankruptcy is a legal means for a debtor used by the court to relieve him of his debts obligations when he his unable to fulfill it's debt obligations payment.
However finding out that the value of a contract initial agreed was overpriced will not make the debt dischargeable nor dischargeable in any circumstances unless it's proven that the debtors is unable to pay his debt.
The debt will equally not be dischargeable if it's found that the debtors has concealed items to defraud the creditor and it's equally dischargeable in some circumstances particularly when the debtors is unable to pay.
Lattimer Company had the following results of operations for the past year: Sales (15,000 units at $12.25) $183,750 Variable manufacturing costs $101,250 Fixed manufacturing costs 24,750 Selling and administrative expenses (all fixed) 39,750 (165,750) Operating income $18,000 A foreign company whose sales will not affect Lattimer's market offers to buy 5,500 units at $8.00 per unit. In addition to existing costs, selling these units would add a $0.30 selling cost for export fees. If Lattimer accepts this additional business, the special order will yield a:
a. $3,850 loss.
b. $6,875 profit.
c. $2,200 loss.
d. $5,225 profit.
e. $9,350 loss.
The special order from the foreign company will yield a profit of $5,225 after all variable costs are accounted for. This is found by subtracting the additional costs of manufacturing and export fees from the revenue from the order.
Explanation:
To calculate the income or loss from the additional business, we need to look at the additional revenue it will bring and the additional costs linked to it. The revenue from the foreign company's order will be 5,500 units * $8.00/unit = $44,000. The additional variable manufacturing cost for the 5,500 units can be calculated by multiplying the cost per unit (Variable manufacturing costs $101,250 / 15,000 units = $6.75 per unit) by 5,500 units, yielding $37,125. The additional selling cost for export fees is $0.30/unit * 5,500 units = $1,650. The total cost of the special order, therefore, is $37,125 + $1,650 = $38,775. So subtracting the total cost from the total income, we find that the special order will yield a profit of $44,000 - $38,775 = $5,225. Thus, the correct answer is d. $5,225 profit.
Learn more about Special Order here:https://brainly.com/question/20378184
#SPJ12
Carlson, Inc. owns 80 percent of Madrid, Inc. Carlson reports net income for 2018 (without consideration of its investment in Madrid, Inc.) of $1,500,000. For the same year, Madrid reports net income of $705,000. Carlson had bonds payable outstanding on January 1, 2018 with a carrying value of $1,200,000. Madrid acquired the bonds on the open market on January 3, 2018 for $1,090,000. For the year 2018, Carlson reported interest expense on the bonds in the amount of $96,000, while Madrid reported interest income of $94,000 for the same bonds. Assuming there are no excess amortizations or other intra-entity transactions, what is Carlson’s share of consolidated net income?
Answer:
$2,176,000
Explanation:
The computation of the Carlson’s share of consolidated net income is shown below:
= Net income for 2018 + Madrid net income × ownership percentage + income from bond + excess interest
= $1,500,000 + $705,000 × 80% + $110,000 + $2,000
= $1,500,000 + $564,000 + $110,000 +$2,000
= $2,176,000
The income from bond would be
= $1,200,000 - $1,090,000
= $110,000
And, the excess interest would be
= $96,000 - $94,000
= $2,000
Reece Corporation is considering the purchase of a machine that would cost $24,388 and would have a useful life of 6 years. The machine would generate $5600 of net annual cash inflows per year for each of the 6 years of its life. The internal rate of return on the machine would be closest to:
Answer:
10%
Explanation:
IRR is the rate at which the net present value of a project is equal to zero. Using a financial calculator, use the following inputs and the CF function to find IRR;
The cost of the machine is the initial investment ; CF0 = -$24,388
Net cashflow year 1; C01 = 5,600
Net cashflow year 2; C02 = 5,600
Net cashflow year 3; C03 = 5,600
Net cashflow year 4; C04 = 5,600
Net cashflow year 5; C05 = 5,600
Net cashflow year 6; C06 = 5,600
then key in CPT IRR = 10.00%
Therefore, the internal rate of return is closest to 10%
For which capital component must you make a tax adjustment when calculating a firm’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC)?
a. Debt
b. Equity
c. Preferred stock
Omni Consumer Products Company (OCP) can borrow funds at an interest rate of 12.50% for a period of seven years. Its marginal federal-plus-state tax rate is 30%. OCP’s after-tax cost of debt is (rounded to two decimal places).
At the present time, Omni Consumer Products Company (OCP) has 20-year noncallable bonds with a face value of $1,000 that are outstanding. These bonds have a current market price of $1,382.73 per bond, carry a coupon rate of 13%, and distribute annual coupon payments. The company incurs a federal-plus-state tax rate of 30%. If OCP wants to issue new debt, what would be a reasonable estimate for its after-tax cost of debt (rounded to two decimal places)? (Note: Round your YTM rate to two decimal place.)
Answer:
1. Debt
2. 8.75%
3. 8.85%
4. 6.195%
Explanation:
For computing the tax adjustment, the Debt capital component is taken
The normal formula to compute WACC is shown below:
= Weightage of debt × cost of debt × ( 1- tax rate) + (Weightage of preferred stock) × (cost of preferred stock) + (Weightage of common stock) × (cost of common stock)
The computation of the pre-tax cost of debt and after-tax cost of debt is shown below:
1. The after tax cost of debt would be
= Pretax cost of debt × ( 1 - tax rate)
= 12.50% × ( 1 - 0.30)
= 8.75%
The NPER represents the time period.
Given that,
Present value = $1,382.73
Assuming figure - Future value or Face value = $1,000
PMT = 1,000 × 13% = $130
NPER = 20 years
The formula is shown below:
= Rate(NPER;PMT;-PV;FV;type)
The present value come in negative
So, after solving this,
3. The pretax cost of debt is 8.85%
4. And, the after tax cost of debt would be
= Pretax cost of debt × ( 1 - tax rate)
= 8.85% × ( 1 - 0.30)
= 6.195%
When calculating a firm's WACC, a tax adjustment is made for the debt component. The after-tax cost of debt is calculated by multiplying the pre-tax cost of debt by one minus the marginal tax rate. Omni Consumer Products Company's after-tax cost of debt is 8.75% based on an interest rate of 12.50% and a tax rate of 30%. The YTM rate on OCP's existing bonds would be a reasonable estimate for its after-tax cost of debt if they want to issue new debt.
Explanation:When calculating a firm's weighted average cost of capital (WACC), you need to make a tax adjustment for debt component. The cost of debt is adjusted for taxes because interest payments made on debt are tax-deductible. To calculate the after-tax cost of debt, you need to multiply the pre-tax cost of debt by one minus the marginal tax rate.
In the case of Omni Consumer Products Company (OCP), they can borrow funds at an interest rate of 12.50%. To calculate the after-tax cost of debt, you would multiply 12.50% by (1 - 30%) = 0.7 to get 8.75% as the after-tax cost of debt for OCP.
If OCP wants to issue new debt, a reasonable estimate for its after-tax cost of debt would be the yield to maturity (YTM) rate on its existing bonds. The YTM rate is the rate of return anticipated on a bond if it is held until maturity and takes into account the bond's current market price, coupon rate, and time to maturity. So, the YTM rate on OCP's existing bonds would be a reasonable estimate for its after-tax cost of debt.
Learn more about tax adjustment for debt here:https://brainly.com/question/33864725
#SPJ3
Two years ago Darryl put $3,000 into an account paying 3 percent interest. How much does he have in the account today? A. $3,180.00 B. $3,182.70 C. $3,183.62 D. None of the above are correct to the nearest cent.
Answer:
Amount in his account after 3 years will be $3182.7
So option (b) is correct answer
Explanation:
We have given time n = 2 years
Principal amount P = $3000
Rate of interest r = 3 %
We have to found the amount in his account after 2 year
We know that amount is given by
[tex]A=P(1+\frac{r}{100})^n[/tex]
So amount will be
[tex]A=3000\times (1+\frac{3}{100})^2=$3182.7[/tex]
So the amount in his account after 3 years will be $3182.7
So option (b) is correct option
Final answer:
After compounding 3 percent annual interest on the initial deposit of $3,000 over two years, Darryl will have a total of $3,182.70 in his account, which corresponds to option B in the given choices.
Explanation:
To answer the question, Darryl put $3,000 into an account paying 3 percent interest compounded annually two years ago. To find out how much he has now, we can use the formula for compound interest:
To answer the question, Darryl put $3,000 into an account paying 3 percent interest compounded annually two years ago. To find out how much he has now, we can use the formula for compound interest:
A = P(1 + r/n)^(nt)
Where:
A is the amount of money accumulated after n years, including interest.
P is the principal amount (the initial amount of money).
r is the annual interest rate (decimal).
n is the number of times that interest is compounded per year.
t is the time the money is invested for in years.
Since the interest is compounded annually, n is 1.
Converting the interest rate to a decimal, we get r = 3/100 = 0.03.
Now, plug in the values:
A = 3000(1 + 0.03/1)^(1*2) = 3000(1 + 0.03)^2 = 3000(1.03)^2 = 3000 * 1.0609 = $3,182.70
Therefore, the correct answer is B. $3,182.70.
Paccar Winch makes winch components for its different product lines. The firm operates its production facility 300 days per year. It has orders for about 12,000 winch components per year and has the capability of producing 100 per day. Setting up the winch production costs $50. The cost of each winch component is $1. The holding cost is $0.10 per winch component per year. a) What is the optimal size of the production run?
b) What is the average holding cost per year?
c) What is the average setup cost per year?
d) What is the total cost per year, including the cost of the winch components?
Answer:
Please see attachment
Explanation:
Please see attachment
Andrew owns a popular, but expensive Chinese restaurant. In order to introduce more people to his brand, he offers a series of one-time "taste fairs" in which he brings his recipes to a locally sponsored event. Customers are able to pay modest amounts for small servings of his creations while not paying for the ambiance of the famous restaurant. What need is Andrew addressing?
the restaurant’s lack of customers
customers’ lack of money
customers’ lack of time
the customers’ lack of access
Answer: customers' lack of money
Explanation:
Here, in this particular case we can state that the restaurateur Andrew who owns and run a popular contemporary but expensive Chinese restaurant is addressing the fact that customer's lack money. The fact in this particular case is that consumers are willing to pay a modest amounts for the small amount of food being served while in contrast not paying for the "atmosphere" of his restaurant.
Consider the three transactions T1, T2, and T3, and the schedules S1 and S2 given below.
Draw the serializability (precedence) graphs for S1 and S2, and state whether each schedule is serializable or not.
If a schedule is serializable, write down the equivalent serial schedule(s).
T1: r1 (X); r1 (Z); w1 (X);
T2: r2 (Z); r2 (Y); w2 (Z); w2 (Y);
T3: r3 (X); r3 (Y); w3 (Y);
S1: r1 (X); r2 (Z); r1 (Z); r3 (X); r3 (Y); w1 (X); w3 (Y); r2 (Y); w2 (Z); w2 (Y);
S2: r1 (X); r2 (Z); r3 (X); r1 (Z); r2 (Y); r3 (Y); w1 (X); w2 (Z); w3 (Y); w2 (Y);
Answer
The answer and procedures of the exercise are attached in a microsoft excel document.
Explanation
Please consider the data provided by the exercise. If you have any question please write me back. All the exercises are solved in a single sheet with the formulas indications.
Armor Sports, Inc. has two product lineslong dashbatting helmets and football helmets. The income statement data for the most recent year is as follows: Total Batting Helmets Football Helmets Sales revenue $ 840 comma 000 $ 500 comma 000 $ 340 comma 000 Variable costs (530 comma 000) (250 comma 000) (280 comma 000) Contribution margin $ 310 comma 000 $ 250 comma 000 $ 60 comma 000 Fixed costs (200 comma 000) (90 comma 000) (110 comma 000) Operating income (loss) $ 110 comma 000 $ 160 comma 000 $(50 comma 000) What is the effect of dropping football helmets line on the operating income of the company? (Assume that fixed costs remain unchanged and that there would be no adverse effect on other sales.)
A.Operating income will increase by $40,000.B.Operating income will increase by $90,000.C.Operating income will decrease by $60,000.D.Operating income will decrease by $350,000.
Answer:
The correct answer is C.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Football Helmets
Sales revenue $ 340,000
Variable costs (280,000)
Contribution margin $ 60,000
Fixed costs (110,000)
Operating income (loss) $(50,000)
Effect on income= fixed costs - operating income= -110,000 + 50,000= - 60,000
The effect of dropping the football helmets line on the operating income of Armor Sports, Inc. would result in a decrease of $50,000.
Explanation:The effect of dropping the football helmets line on the operating income of Armor Sports, Inc. can be found by examining the contribution margin and fixed costs associated with the football helmets line. From the income statement data, we can see that the contribution margin for football helmets is $60,000 and the fixed costs for this line is $110,000. Therefore, if the football helmets line is dropped, the operating income will decrease by $50,000 (the difference between the contribution margin and the fixed costs).
Learn more about Effect on operating income here:https://brainly.com/question/30700695
#SPJ12
ABC Inc. recently hired your consulting firm to improve the company's performance. It has been highly profitable but has been experiencing cash shortages due to its high growth rate. As one part of your analysis, you want to determine the firm's cash conversion cycle. Using the following information and a 365-day year, what is the firm's present cash conversion cycle?
Average inventoy= 75,000
Annual sales= 600,000
Annual cost of goods sold= 360,000
Average accounts receivable= 160,000
Average accounts payable= 25,000
Answer:
CCC - Cash Conversion Cycle 148,03 Days
Explanation:
The Cash Conversion Cycle it's the sum of "Days of Inventory Outstanding".
"Days Sales Outstanding" and "Days Payables Outstanding"
CCC - Cash Conversion Cycle : 76,04 + 97,33 + 25,35 = 148,03
Days of Inventory OutstandingIt's calculated by dividing Average Inventory by Cost of Goods,
and that result multiplied by 365
Days Sales OutstandingIt's calculated by dividing Accounts Receivable by Sales,
and that result multiplied by 365
Days Payables OutstandingIt's calculated by dividing Accounts Payables by Cost of Goods,
and that result multiplied by 365
CCC - Cash Conversion Cycle 148
DIO - Days of Inventory Outstanding 76,04 = 75,000/360,000*365
Average Inventory 75,000
Cost Of Goods 360,000
DSO - Days Sales Outstanding 97,33 = $160,000/$600,000*365
Accounts Receivable 160,000
Sales 600,000
DPO - Days Payables Outstanding 25,35 = $25,000/$360,000*365
Accounts Payables 25,000
Cost Of Goods 360,000
TopChop sells hairstyling franchises. TopChop receives $56,000 from a new franchisee for providing initial training, equipment and furnishings that have a standalone selling price of $56,000. TopChop also receives $35,000 per year for use of the TopChop name and for ongoing consulting services (starting on the date the franchise is purchased). Carlos became a TopChop franchisee on July 1, 2016, and on August 1, 2016, had completed training and was open for business.
How much revenue in 2016 will TopChop recognize for its arrangement with Carlos?
Answer:
$73,500 is the revenue TopChop will recognize for the arrangement with Carlos.
Explanation:
Revenue is calculated as follows.
= amount received + Use of name
= $56,000 + $35,000 × (1÷2)
= $73,500
New franchise fee can be immediately recognised as income.
Final answer:
TopChop would recognize $56,000 for the initial equipment and training, and a prorated amount of $17,500 for the half-year use of the franchise name and consulting services, totaling $73,500 in revenue for 2016.
Explanation:
TopChop will recognize revenue based on when the services are provided. Since the franchise was purchased on July 1, 2016, and Carlos completed training and opened for business on August 1, 2016, TopChop would recognize the full $56,000 for the initial training, equipment, and furnishings immediately, as this is the standalone selling price and the service was provided.
Additionally, TopChop would recognize prorated annual fees for the consulting services and use of the TopChop name starting from July 1, 2016, to December 31, 2016 (half of the $35,000 annual fee), which is $17,500.
Therefore, the total revenue recognized by TopChop for its arrangement with Carlos in 2016 would be $56,000 (for setup services) plus $17,500 (from the annual fee), totaling $73,500.
Fame Company manufactures engines. Fame produces all the parts necessary for its engines, except for one electronic component, which is purchased from two local suppliers: Hydra International and Parable Company. Both suppliers are reliable and rarely deliver late. Hydra sells the component for $12.00 per unit, while Parable sells the same component for $10.00. Fame purchases 80% of its components from Parable because of the lower price it offers. The total annual demand is 95,000 units.
I. Activity Data
Activity Cost
Inspecting components (sampling only) $ 210,000
Reworking products (due to failed component) $2,454,000
Warranty work (due to failed component) $1,923,000
II. Supplier Data
Hydra Parable
International Company
Unit purchase price $12.00 $10.00
Units purchased 19,000 76,000
Sampling hours 60 2,600
Rework hours 150 3,800
Warranty hours 550 7,000
Suppose that Fame loses $3,500,000 in sales per year because of its reputation for defective units attributable to failed components. Using warranty hours, assign the proportional cost of lost sales to Parable Company. What is the increase in the cost per component? (Note: Round the lost sales per warranty hour and the cost of the component to two decimal places.)
The increase in the cost per component attributable to Parable Company is approximately $42.82.
To find the increase in the cost per component attributable to Parable Company, we'll follow these steps:
Determine the lost sales per warranty hour.
Calculate the proportional cost of lost sales for Parable Company.
Divide the proportional cost by the units purchased from Parable to find the increase in the cost per component.
Let's proceed with the calculations:
Step 1: Lost Sales per Warranty Hour
Lost Sales per Warranty Hour = [tex]\frac{Total \:Lost \:Sales}{Total \:Warranty\: Hours}[/tex]
Lost Sales per Warranty Hour = [tex]\frac{\$ 3,500,000}{550+7,000}[/tex]
Lost Sales per Warranty Hour [tex]\approx \frac{\$ 3,500,000}{7,550}[/tex] ≈ $463.58
Step 2: Proportional Cost of Lost Sales for Parable Company
Proportional Cost for Parable = Lost Sales per Warranty Hour × Warranty Hours for Parable
Proportional Cost for Parable ≈ $463.58 × 7,000
Proportional Cost for Parable ≈ $3,254,060
Step 3: Increase in Cost per Component for Parable Company
Increase in Cost per Component for Parable = [tex]\frac{\text { Proportional Cost for Parable }}{\text { Units Purchased from Parable }}[/tex]
Increase in Cost per Component for Parable [tex]\frac{\$ 3,254,060}{76,000}[/tex]
Increase in Cost per Component for Parable ≈ $42.82
Final answer:
To allocate the cost of lost sales to Parable Company based on warranty hours, we divide the total lost sales by the total warranty hours to find a per hour cost, then multiply this by Parable's warranty hours. The new cost per component from Parable is found by adding this cost to their original purchase price, resulting in a new cost of $52.70 per component.
Explanation:
The proportional cost of lost sales to Parable Company is calculated using the warranty hours. First, we determine the lost sales per warranty hour by dividing the total lost sales by the total warranty hours. Then, we assign this cost to Parable based on their share of warranty hours. Finally, we calculate the increase in cost per component for Parable by adding the proportional lost sales cost to their purchase price.
Lets calculate the lost sales per warranty hour:
Total lost sales = $3,500,000Total warranty hours = Hydra (550) + Parable (7,000) = 7,550 hoursLost sales per warranty hour = Total lost sales / Total warranty hoursLost sales per warranty hour = $3,500,000 / 7,550Lost sales per warranty hour = $463.58 (rounded to two decimal places)Now, lets assign this cost to Parable:
Parable warranty hours = 7,000Assigned lost sales cost to Parable = Lost sales per warranty hour * Parable's warranty hoursAssigned lost sales cost to Parable = $463.58 * 7,000Assigned lost sales cost to Parable = $3,245,060Finally, we calculate the increase in cost per component for Parable. This is done by dividing the assigned lost sales cost to Parable by the total units purchased from Parable:
Units purchased from Parable = 76,000Increased cost per component due to lost sales = Assigned lost sales cost to Parable / Units purchased from ParableIncreased cost per component due to lost sales = $3,245,060 / 76,000Increased cost per component due to lost sales = $42.70 (rounded to two decimal places)The new cost per component from Parable, including the assigned lost sales cost, would be the sum of the original purchase price and the increased cost per component:
New cost per component from Parable = Original purchase price + Increased cost per componentNew cost per component from Parable = $10.00 + $42.70New cost per component from Parable = $52.70 (rounded to two decimal places)On January 1, 20X1, the Holloran Corporation purchased a machine at a cost of $55,000. The machine was expected to have a service life of 10 years and a $5,000 residual value. The straight-line depreciation method was used. In 20X3, the company switched to the double-declining-balance depreciation method. Depreciation for 20X3 should be:Multiple Choice$12,750$10,000$11,250$8,500
Answer:
The answer is $11250
Explanation:
Depreciation is used to depict the loss of value in an asset once it has been purchased. In this case, the machine's value at the end of 20X1 is $55000 less the depreciated amount. There are many methods of calculating depreciation. Holloran uses straight line for 20X1 and 20X2 then changes to the double declining method in 20X3.
To compute depreciation using the straight line method:
(Cost of asset - residual value)/duration of use
Accumulated depreciation for 20X1 and 20X2 is: (($55000-$5000)/10) * 2 =$ 10,000
To compute depreciation using the double declining method:
2 * depreciation rate * Book value (cost of asset less depreciation) at the beginning of the period.
At the beginning of 20X3, the book value of the machine is $45,000 ($55,000 - $10,000) and the remaining useful life is 8 years, therefore the depreciation rate = (100/8) = 12.5%.
To calculate depreciation for 20X3 on the double declining method: 2*12.5%*$45000 = $11,250
Activity Cost Pool Total Cost Total Activity Activity Rate Machine setups $ 20,000 200 setups $ 100 per setup Special processing $ 150,000 10,000 MHs $ 15 per machine-hour General factory $ 200,000 20,000 direct labour-hours $ 10 per direct labour-hour Total overhead costs $ 370,000 What is the total overhead cost assigned to Product A, if Product A used 100 setups, no special processing and 10,000 direct labor-hours? $10,000 $1,000 $110,000 $100,000
Answer:
total overhead cost = $110,000
so correct option is c. $110,000
Explanation:
given data
used = 100 setups
direct labor-hours = 1000
to find out
What is the total overhead cost assigned to Product A
solution
we get total overhead cost that is express as
total overhead cost = [ $100 per machine setup × 100 setups ] + [ $15 per machine-hours × 0 special processing ] + [ 10 per direct labor-hour × 10,000 direct labor-hours ]
so
total overhead cost = $10,000 + $0 + $100,000
total overhead cost = $110,000
so correct option is c. $110,000
Final answer:
The total overhead cost assigned to Product A is $110,000, calculated by adding the cost of machine setups ($10,000) and the cost of direct labor hours ($100,000). There was no special processing cost for Product A.
Explanation:
To calculate the total overhead cost assigned to Product A, we apply the activity rates to the actual levels of activity that Product A used. For machine setups, we have an activity rate of $100 per setup and Product A used 100 setups, resulting in a cost of $10,000 for machine setups (100 setups imes $100/setup = $10,000). There was no special processing, so this cost is $0. For direct labor-hours, the rate is $10 per direct labor-hour and Product A used 10,000 direct labor-hours, giving us a cost of $100,000 for direct labor-hours (10,000 direct labor-hours imes $10/direct labor-hour = $100,000). Adding these costs together, the total overhead cost assigned to Product A is $110,000 ($10,000 from setups + $100,000 from labor).
Suppose the price level reflects the number of dollars needed to buy a basket of goods containing one can of soda, one bag of chips, and one comic book. In year one, the basket costs $10.00. In year two, the price of the same basket is $9.00. From year one to year two, there is at an annual rate of . In year one, $50.00 will buy baskets, and in year two, $50.00 will buy baskets. This example illustrates that, as the price level falls, the value of money .
Answer:
price level fall and value of money is rises
Explanation:
given data
one year basket costs = $10.00
two year two basket costs = $9.00
one year buy baskets = $50
year two,buy baskets = $50
to find out
as the price level falls, the value of money will be
solution
we see that when we compare to 1 year price go down from $10 to $ 9
so deflation at annual rate is [tex]\frac{10-9}{10}[/tex] = 10%
so here
sum of $50 will be buy here = [tex]\frac{50}{10}[/tex] = $5 in one year
and $ 50 buy in 2 year is = [tex]\frac{50}{9}[/tex] = $5.56 in two year
so this is show here that price level fall and value of money is rises
The price level reflects the number of dollars needed to buy a basket of goods, and as the price level falls, the value of money increases.
Explanation:The price level reflects the number of dollars needed to buy a basket of goods. In year one, the basket costs $10.00, and in year two, the price is $9.00. From year one to year two, there is an annual rate of inflation of 10%. This example illustrates that as the price level falls, the value of money increases.
Two Harvard economists, Robert Barro and Rachel McCleary, have researched the role that ________________ plays in economic growth. a. meta-ideas b. religion c. human resource development d. technology
When investing for a long term, investors care about the volatility of ________ returns and not
the volatility of ________ returns.
A) average, cumulative
B) cumulative, average
C) mean, cumulative
D) mean, average
Answer:
B) cumulative, average
Explanation:
Cumulative return is the total return that the investment has earned; the average return has to do with the average return of investment that has accrued to the investment within a specified period.
Stacey and Andrew each own one-half of the stock in Parakeet Corporation, a calendar year taxpayer. Cash distributions from Parakeet are: $350,000 to Stacey and $150,000 to Andrew. If Parakeet’s current E&P is $160,000, how much current E&P is allocated to Andrew’s distribution?
Question 8 options:
$5,000
$10,000
$48,000
$150,000
None of the above.
Answer:
$48,000
Explanation:
E&P allocate for Andrew's distribution
= 160,000 * 150,000/(350,000+150,000)
= 160,000 * 150,000/500,000
= 48,000
The correct answer is $48,000
A firm has a tax burden of 0.9,a leverage ratio of 1.1, an interest burden of 0.6, and a return-on-sales ratio of 13%. The firm generates $2.62 in sales per dollar of assets.
What is the firm's ROE?
Answer:
the firm's ROE is 20%
Explanation:
The tax burden is 0.9
The interest burden is 0.6
The return on sales margin is 13%
The turnover ratio is 2.62
The leverage ratio is 1.1
Calculate the ROE
ROE = 0.9 * 0.6 * 0.13 * 2.62 * 1.1
=0.2 or 20%
Hank owns a gym called Ultimate Fitness. During the past year, Hank sold his facility to purchase a larger building with a parking lot. He received sales proceeds of $125,000 from the buyer. He paid a sales commission to his broker of $6,500. The building had an original cost of $105,500 and had accumulated depreciation for tax purposes of $15,825. What is Hank's realized gain or loss on the sale? Gain of $118,5
Answer:
$28,825 gain
Explanation:
For computing the gain or loss, first, we have to determine the book value of an asset which is shown below:
= Original value of the building - accumulated depreciation
= $105,500 - $15,825
= $89,675
So, the gain would be
= Sale value - sales commission - book value
= $125,000 - $6,500 - $89,675
= $28,825 gain
Maquiladoras are
a. import-export agents of the Mexican government.
b. production facilities in north-central Mexican states.
c. freight forwarders from Mexico.
d. exchange controls from central banks in Latin American countries.
e. global marketing programs established in Latin American countries.
Answer: b. production facilities in north-central Mexican states.
Explanation: A maquiladora is a company located in the north of Mexico, which usually imports the products with tax facilities, performs a manufacturing process and then exports the products to which they belong again, this figure is used to reduce production costs. Example: A textile company, manufactures the products outside the country and then the finished product returns to the origin.
Use the data set WAGE2.dta to estimate the following model: log (wage) = β0 + β1educ + β2exper + β3tenure + β4married + β5south + β6urban + β7black + β8IQ + u (a) Use the variable KWW (the "knowledge of the world of work" test score) as a proxy for ability in place of IQ. What is the estimated return to education in this case? (b) Now, use IQ and KWW together as proxy variables. What happens to the estimated return to education? (c) In part (b), are IQ and KWW individuall significant? Are they jointly significant?
Answer
The answer and procedures of the exercise are attached in the following archives.
Explanation
You will find the procedures, formulas or necessary explanations in the archive attached below. If you have any question ask and I will aclare your doubts kindly.