As Jackson was losing cabinet members, he still took advice from close friends and advisors, who were known collectively as the “__________.”

An example of violation of Enlightenment rights in Latin America under Spanish Rule is B. A rigid social class system strictly determined by birth, which granted rights to some and restricted rights from others.

There was a complex race system that asignated each individual its place in society according to its ascendency: metropolitan, colonial, indian, black, white. The other two are examples of Enlightenment rights that weren't respected until after independence.

a. the body of the reptile changes

1.) Chartres Cathedral, Chartres, France. Chartres Cathedral is a splendid example of French Gothic architecture as well as one of the best preserved Gothic buildings in Europe. The cathedral was built from the late 12th century until the mid-13th century and has remained nearly unchanged ever since its completion.

2.) It is an example, The Cathedral Church of Saint Peter and Saint Paul in the City and Diocese of Washington, commonly known as Washington National Cathedral, is a cathedral of the Episcopal Church located in Washington, D.C., the capital of the United States.

3.) They are both ancient, both serve the same purpose, both forms of Gothic Architecture, Identical design, both are extremely huge.

4.) They are in different countries, the Salisbury was built in the 1200s, the Washington Cathedral was made in the early 2000s, the Salisbury is bigger in height, the Washington is wider but the height is shorter.

Answer:

it was by planting and selling tobacco. Hope this helps!

Explanation:

Under Article IV, Section 1 of the United States Constitution, States have to respect all public records, acts, and judicial proceedings.

Thus we can conclude that this is done to ensure that states respect and honor each other state laws and court orders.

Were a State not required to uphold this Article, it would result in:

Article IV of the US Constitution, states in its "Full Faith and Credit Clause" that every state must pay full respect to the states’ statutes, public records, and court decisions.

It further states that every state must follow the juridical decision of other states and implement them in the same way they were implemented at home.

The clause prevents states from reopening the cases which already have been concluded in other states. This, therefore, leads to juridical efficieny.

There will be uniformity in the decisions of each state.

If states were not required to give full faith and credit to the public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of other States, the decision-making will be delayed and there will be a lack of uniformity.

Every state will make decisions as per their own law and hence will result in conflicts.

Learn more about the Full Faith and Credit Clause here:

https://brainly.com/question/1345801

the Populists and Socialist Intellectuals

hope it helps

He sought to unify the Federalists and Republicans. goodluck mark brainliest

Answer: c, he sought to unify...

Explanation:

The Confederate attack on Fort Sumter on April 12, 1861, marked the beginning of the Civil War.

The result of the Confederate attack on Fort Sumter, South Carolina, on April 12, 1861, was the beginning of the Civil War. Confederate forces began to fire on Union forces stationed at Fort Sumter, which marked the start of the conflict between the Confederate states and the United States. After enduring a 33-hour bombardment, the Union soldiers at Fort Sumter surrendered to the Confederate forces, resulting in the first victory for the South.

Your answer would be A. The Pendleton Civil Service from 1883 required hiring certain federal employees based on their experience not their political connections.

Answer:

The Pendleton Civil Service Act reduced the power of the spoils system by requiring to hire certain federal employees because of expertise, not political connections.

Explanation:

The Pendleton Civil Service Act, passed in 1883, prohibited the employment or dismissal of US federal officials on political grounds. Before the law came into force, it was normal for the ruling party to place party supporters in prominent positions. One of the most well-known examples is that of 1871, when Chester A. Arthur was nominated by President Ulysses S. Grant and one of the Republican Party's leading figures, Roscoe Conkling, for the New York Harbor. Arthur, who received about a thousand subordinates, hired Conkling-backed Republicans, who paid part of their wages directly to the party.

The statement is false. While the Speaker of the House leads the House of Representatives, the Senate is led by the Majority Leader and the President pro tempore, not a Speaker of the Senate.

The statement regarding leadership of the House and Senate contains an inaccuracy. In the United States Congress, the leader of the House of Representatives is indeed the Speaker of the House. This position is highly influential, serving as the presiding officer, the administrative head of the House, and the partisan leader of the majority party. However, the Senate is different; it does not have a Speaker. Instead, the Vice President of the United States acts as the President of the Senate but votes only in the case of a tie. The day-to-day proceedings are typically presided over by the President pro tempore, a largely ceremonial role often held by the most senior member of the majority party. The real power in the Senate in terms of leadership lies with the Senate Majority Leader.

Therefore, the correct answer is false: The Senate does not have a Speaker; it is led by the Majority Leader and the President pro tempore.

It is essential to the concept known as "place". In Geography we can describe a place by explaining two kinds of characteristics; physical and human. When we talked about the physical characteristics, we consider the environment and all the geological, hydrologic, atmospheric, and biological processes. When we talk about the human characteristics, we describe a place in relation to human ideas and actions.

Note: same answer to question 11250356.

Regarding national security, one of the faculties congress has is to fund the military. Therefore, it has the power to decide wether or not is economically convenient for the country to finance a military operation. Wether the mission is targeted towards a location inside the borders or outside them. If congressmen, after debating this issue, conclude that such funding can be harmful to the economical welfare of the country, then they will probably end up, dismissing the executive's propossal of getting funds. It is not in Congress's faculties to advice the president regarding treaties with foreign countries. This is a responsibility of the diplomatic branch of the Executive. They will give the President the most adecuate advice possible, taking into consideration the current state of affairs with a foreign country. Diplomats are deployed in countries located in every continent. Each diplomatic office located in a foreign country foresees the relations between it and the US. It also has a deeper understanding of the current issues sorrounding that region. Finally, congress has the power to approve or deny if the country is to engage in a war with a foreign country, but regarding the logistics of the operation (number of troops, vehicles, ships, etc), this is a decision that is within the responsibility of the Army. The army´s headquarters is known as The Pentagon. This is the organization that manages the Army´s current resources and assigns them according to the decisions made by the government. Wether it is related to protecting the borders or engaging in an armed conflict with a foreign country.

Small villages found on the archaeological site that is south on New Mexico indicate that the Cuicuilco were an agricultural community around 1200 BC.

At some point between 800 BC and 600 BC, their city became an important cerimonial center, considering the size of the many monuments built by them back then. The people from that city even built a large pyramid with a 100m radius that had an circular base. The pyramid is about 20m high.

After that, they turned into a hierarchical society. It is estimated that their population reached about 20,000 people. Also, they developed a particular kind of pottery that was different from the other cultures of Mesoamerica.

I would say that their Pyramid was their great legacy.

The Tlatilco is also an archaeological site.

The more than 300 graves found revealed that their burials were made under the dwellings, apparently. Also, many of them showed showed evidence of dental mutilation as well as ritual cranial deformation.

Their statues made of ceramic represented woman in skirts or naked and the occasional male figure. Also, many of them had deformities or anomalies and female bicephalous figures.

Tlatilca agriculture was centered on corn, but also included beans, amaranth, and pumpkin. Birds, rabbits, deer and other animals were also part of their meals, though.

Tlatilca culture shows a marked increase in specialization over previous cultures. They most likely had specialized professions and a stratified social structure with complex settlement patterns.

Their greatest legacy is most likely their art.

Answer:

B)The western front became a stalemate.

Explanation:

The Western Front of World War I was opened in 1914 after the German Empire's army invaded Belgium and Luxembourg, so it gained military control of important industrial areas of France. The advance of the Empire underwent a dramatic turn after the first battle of the Marne, where the alliance between France and the United Kingdom defeated. Both sides -Aliados and Central Powers- settled in a sinuous line of fortified trenches, which extended from the North Sea to the Swiss border with France. That line remained static for most of the war.

Between 1915 and 1917, major offensives occurred along the front. In the attacks, huge bombardments with artillery and large infantry demonstrations were carried out. The combination of trenches, machine guns, barbed wire and artillery inflicted many casualties on the aggressive and defensive forces. As a result, no significant progress was made. Among the most costly of these offensives were the Battle of Verdun, the Battle of the Somme and the Battle of Passchendaele - with nearly 700,000, 1,000,000 and 600,000 dead respectively. In an effort to dissolve the stalemate, this front allowed the introduction of new war technologies, such as poisonous gas, combat aircraft and tanks. But only after the adoption of improved military tactics did some degree of mobility recover.

Despite the stagnation of this front, this scenario turned out to be of decisive importance. The inexorable advance of the allied armies in 1918 convinced the German commanders that defeat was inevitable, and the government was forced to negotiate the conditions of an armistice.

Final answer:

The Germans were unable to finish the war on the western front due to the stalemate that resulted from trench warfare, resource depletion, and the subsequent entry of US forces which tipped the balance in favor of the Allies.

Explanation:

During World War I, the Germans were unable to finish the war on the Western Front primarily because the Western Front became a stalemate. Despite the early success of their campaign in the east, where they outmaneuvered and defeated the Russians on several occasions, the situation on the western front was vastly different. The German advance into France was halted at the Battle of the Marne by French and British forces. Subsequent efforts to break through the entrenched lines failed, resulting in a static and costly trench warfare that extended along the western front from the North Sea to the Swiss border.

Compounding the situation, Germany faced a war of attrition which depleted its resources, despite the final efforts at a breakthrough before the United States entered the war on the side of the Allies. The introduction of American troops and resources into the conflict further swung the balance in favor of the Allies. By the end of 1918, after a failed spring offensive, and with widespread shortages and internal pressure, the Germans sought an armistice, realizing that a victory was out of reach and seeking to prevent further unnecessary suffering.

Answer:    Christians were no longer persecuted

Explanation:  Constantine's decision to legalize Christianity was enforced by the Edict of Milan 313 AD. In this way, Christianity became one of the religions of the Roman Empire, not yet the official religion of the Empire. This ended the era of so-called early Christianity, which was characteristic of the persecution of Christians, but also of the diversity of Christian teachings and gospels. Shortly after the legalization of Christianity, apart from the end of the persecution of Christians, a Ecumenical Council was convened to decide which gospel would become official as part of the official Bible. In this way, the adherents of the various Christian Gnostic teachings did not become part of the official Bible, and began to be persecuted as heretics.

Abu Abdullah Muhammad, also known as Ibn Battuta was a Muslim scholar and traveler of Moroccan origin who undertook a series of travels and excursions during his life which are now a days called the Rihla (The Travels). Unlike the influence the travels of other explorers, such as Marco Polo had, Battuta's travels only had a very modest impact on the world until the 19th century. Despite not providing much influence to other explorers, Battuta's accounts of his travels provide a gateway to the civilizations of the muslim world during the age.

There are several advantages, as well as drawbacks, in adopting imperialistic policies. Some of the advantages are acquiring more territory (which comes with more population, resources, etc.), having a larger market for economic purposes, and collecting more tax revenue. Some of the drawbacks are damaging a country's reputaton in the international arena, having to militarily protect a larger territory, and being responsible for the welfare of a larger number of citizens.

The U. S. was seen as a force that could help maintain peace and freedom in the world, and as a protection against tyrannical governments. However, after its foreign policy turned more imperialistic, countries around the world became doubtful about accepting U. S. help or intervention. This reputation of catastrophic involvement is similar to the one other colonial powers had, such as the United Kingdom and France.

The foreign policy goals of the U. S. as it moved into the 20th century are difficult to establish. On the one hand, the U. S. was still interested in maintaining its power around the world, but on the other hand, they were aware of the negative connotations of imperialism. The country adopted a policy of influence through soft power, which it maintains to this day.

She should ask these three questions;

1) Do I need this car or should I use my old car a little longer?

2) Is this a reliable vehicle?

3) Will buying this car prevent me from saving money to buy a house?

All of these options are related to the financial planning which is the most logical and apt thing to consider when buying an expensive item, the other options are not relevant to the scenario.  

ANSWER: A) Do I need this car or should I use my old car a little longer? B) Is this a reliable vehicle? D) Will buying this car prevent me from saving money to buy a house?

EXPLANATION: Amanda should focus on her financial planning before making a new purchase. As buying a new car will involve investing her saved up money, she should be cautious before taking any decision. She should ask these three questions to confirm her decision. She should confirm on the fact whether her old car will run a little longer or not. If it does, she should delay her purchase and make use of her old car to the maximum. She should also be sure of the car she has chosen to purchase. It should be reliable in every sense and should satisfy her needs. Lastly, she should think of her leftover savings as it would affect her future decisions. Her plan to buy a house in the future may delay because of her investment in the car.

Answer: Leading question.

A leading question is one in which the researcher's way of asking might lead a respondent to answer in a biased, particular way. It often aligns with the goals of the researcher, and can harm the reliability and credibility of a survey.

In this case, the researcher is asking the question in a way that gives a bad image of Donald Trump, and would likely lead the respondent to answer in the biased way that the researcher is looking for.

Bush proposed legislation to bail out the savings and loan industry to avert an economic crisis caused by a significant number of failing banks, which resulted from deregulation allowing S&Ls to make riskier loans.

President George W. Bush proposed legislation to assist the savings and loan industry as a means to end an economic crisis precipitated by failing banks. This industry crisis began in the late 1980s due to deregulation that allowed savings and loan institutions (S&Ls) to make riskier loans, resulting in significant bankruptcies when the real estate market declined. Furthermore, the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 allocated $700 billion to bail out large financial institutions, aiming to prevent a complete collapse of the American economic system, an eventuality that became quite real with the troubles of Bear Stearns and the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers.

The government was compelled to step in because these institutions were integral to the U.S. economy, and their collapse could have led to a domino effect of economic failure. The Emergency Banking Relief Bill, however, offered little to smaller banks, and hundreds of these collapsed. The legislation raised criticism of potential socialism and overreach of government authority, though such measures were argued to be necessary to save the free-market system and prevent a second Great Depression.

Learn more about Savings and Loan Crisis here:

https://brainly.com/question/29544462

#SPJ11

Let us take each war separately. First, WWI, then WWII

WWI:

World War I was almost inevitable. The tensions between Serbia and Austrio-Hungary grew beyond control, with little chance of being fixed. Also, as war was inevitable, it led to countries creating large and complicated military alliances, which soon led to the "World" war.

Causes:

The fuse for the war finally reached detonation, when:

1) Austrio-Hungary annexed territories that Serbia wanted to annex, leading to increased tension

2) Serbian Princip assasinated Archduke Franz Ferdinand and his wife Sophie, triggering the war.

3) Austrio-Hungary did not accept the compensation at first put up by Serbia, and, to be able to take over all of Serbia, declared war in hope of annexing Serbia.

This led to each country declaring war successively because of their pledge to help each other, leading it to a global war

Effects of the War:

After 4 bloody years of war, and large technological advancements (in compared to the previous wars), death and wounded tolls were drastic, and even went up to the millions. There were large amounts of effects, in which some are connected with the start of WWII. To start, let us list some changes that did not have a large effect on WWII:

1) Dissolvement of the Ottoman Empire and Austrio-Hungary: As part of the treaty, the two countries were dissolved, and were broken to smaller states. Austrio-Hungary became two nations, Austria and Hungary, while the Ottoman Empire split into several smaller states that are located in the Middle East, with the largest chunk being present-day Turkey.

Some causes that led to the start of WWII:

1) War reparation: Seen as unfair in today's society, the Allies decided to put most of the war costs on Germany (even though they did not actually want the war to start, and even warned Austrio-Hungary against it.)

2) Great Depression: Because of the above, the Kaiser became unpopular, and had to step down. Large amounts of debt meant more bank-note printing, which led to the decrease in value of German currency.

3) Rise of Nazi Party: Combined with a downturn of the economy, and then the Great Depression on top of that, the then small Nazi Party was able to grow in size, and was able to coup de'tat the government, replacing the conventional government with Hitler, which rose from being the leader to chancellor, and then the supreme leader.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Start of WWII:

WWII can actually be partly the Allies fault, due to mismanagement and fighting a defensive war (at first).

1) German Aggression: To solve some of the economic problems, Germany started to annex territories, build up it's army, and produce military equipment (all breaking the Treaty of Versailles, which could have led to the Allies breaking down his government, essentially stopping the war in the West).

2) Japanese greed: Japan soon joined the Axis Power, because Japan believed that they essentially "got the wrong end of the stick". Japan joined the war on the Allied side during WWI, and seized many German colonies in the Pacific. Expecting more, they helped the Allied side. However, during the treaty, the Allies did not give Japan what they wanted, leading to Japan hatred, and them joining the Axis in the Second World War.

3) Italy: Italy essentially also had a coup'de'tat, as Mussolini was able to take over the government. He soon joined the Axis side, completing the major powers. Mussolini started his aggression by building up his military (which was technically legal, as they were not limited under the Treaty of Versailles), and taking over African colonies.

Effects of the War:

1) During the war, we saw large technological advancements in many branches. One of the largest effect was the creation of nuclear weapons, which was what made the Cold War extremely scary for the duration of the period.

2) The governments of Germany & Italy were toppled and changed. Japan was able to keep parts of it's government, but was constantly monitored by the US, and parts were changed.

3) Rise of Super Powers: In the end of WWII, we saw the rise of two allies who will later turn bitter enemies because of their economic class differences, the U.S.S.R and the U.S.A. With the differences, and the hope to extend influence throughout the world (spheres of influence in a sense), they soon got into the Cold War.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Actually there was many causes in both of the world war 1 and 2. One Cause was when the aggressive actions of Germany, Japan, and Italy were ignored.

An Japan invaded Manchuria and China, Not much was actually done to deal with the invasions.

The Second cause was  the was the rage the harsh Versailles Treaty were being treated.

Hope this helped

You didn't actually provide the link mentioned, but here's what I would say:

Constitutional officials of the Maine state government:

Maine is one of five states that don't have an office of Lieutenant Governor.  

Maine does not have an official called the "State Comptroller."  There is a statutory officer called the State Auditor, which is responsible for auditing the state's finances.  There is also an Office of the State Controller ... but technically no office called "comptroller."

the answers are 1,2, and 4

B. Pathos because she is encouraging the troops by attempting to elicit their feelings of loyalty.

The correct answer is B) Pathos because she is encouraging the troops by attempting to elicit their feelings of loyalty.

In Queen Elizabeth address to the troops in Tilbury, Queen Elizabeth is using Pathos because she is encouraging the troops by attempting to elicit their feelings of loyalty.

When Queen Elizabeth uses phrases in her speech such as "my faithful and loyal people" or the loyal hearts and goodwill of my subjects," she is using the appeal of Pathos because she wanted to deliver her message to the emotion of the people. If she had wanted to use the reason or logic, trying to convince them, she would have used logos.

The other options of the question were a) rhetorical appeal of pathos because she is encouraging the troops by explaining exactly why she has faith in them, c) logos because she is encouraging the troops by reminding them the rewards they will receive, and d) logos because she is encouraging the troops by listing the reasons England is relying on them.

They had massive oil reserves

Answer:

Because they were rich in resources and thinly settled.

Explanation:

Back int he early 1800s, many settlers moved to the west. They went over the Appalachian Mountains; to new territories and states. These pioneers moved to the regions of Texas, California, and some other lands that belonged to Mexico. Obviously, the fact that the resources were abundant would only bring more people to those areas.

Some Hindu and Buddhist monks and nuns would shave their heads

Final answer:

The Sumerians and early Christian monks in England are two groups known for shaving their heads, reflecting cultural and religious practices.

Explanation:

Throughout history, different cultures have adopted the practice of shaving heads for various reasons. Two groups that are known to have shaved their heads at certain times are the Sumerians and those following the monastic tradition during the early Christian period in England. Sumerians, as depicted on artifacts such as the Stela of the Vultures and in sculpture, often had shorn heads and faces, distinguishing them from the bearded Semites. The Sumerian barbers held an important societal role, and a shorn head could even be a punishment for filial disrespect.

In early Christian England, the practice of tonsure—shaving or cutting the hair in particular ways as a mark of religious devotion—proliferated, with debates at the Synod of Whitby focusing on whether to follow the Roman tonsure (shaving only the top of the head) or the Celtic method (shaving the whole front of the head from ear to ear).

These practices illustrate the significant role that hair and haircuts have played in cultural rituals, social structures, and personal identity throughout human history.

A sort of curry maybe i have no idea

Hey mate. Here is your answer for this question.

Answer: Potjiekos ("pot food") is an Afrikaans term for food cooked in layers in traditional three-legged cast iron pot. But it is also a stew. This is most appropriate for an African dish. Just follow the recipe and you'll get it!

Hope this helped!

Urbanization. The Industrial Revolution changed material production, wealth, labor patterns and population distribution. ... Population movement was caused by people living in small farming communities who moved to cities. These prospective workers were looking for wage labor in newly developed factories.

The major results of the industrial revolution was the transition from an agrarian economy into a manufacturing economy.

   The Industrial Revolution describes the transition from an agrarian and handicraft economy to one characterized by industry and machine manufacturing.

   The major effect of the industrial revolution in the west was that in transitioned the economy into machine manufacturing paving way for better goods and services.

Learn more about the industrial revolution at https://brainly.com/question/13323062

#SPJ1