Assuming that Albertine's mass is 60.0 kg , for what value of μk, the coefficient of kinetic friction between the chair and the waxed floor, does she just reach the glass without knocking it over? Use g = 9.80 m/s2 for the magnitude of the acceleration due to gravity.

Final answer:

The question is about using the single slit diffraction formula to calculate the angles at which the third dark fringe appears for two different wavelengths and the width of the central bright fringe for each wavelength, involving physics and high school level understanding.

Explanation:

The student's question relates to the concept of single slit diffraction, which is a phenomenon in physics where light spreads out after passing through a narrow opening, resulting in a characteristic pattern. Specifically, the angles at which dark fringes appear and the width of the central bright fringe are calculated for two different wavelengths using the formulas for single slit diffraction.

For part (a), to calculate the angles for the third dark fringe for each wavelength, we can use the formula dsin(θ) = mλ, where d is the slit width, θ is the angle of the dark fringe, m is the order of the dark fringe, and λ is the wavelength of the light. The third dark fringe corresponds to m = 3 for this calculation. For part (b), the width of the central bright fringe is calculated by considering the angles to the first dark fringes on either side of the central peak and then using trigonometry to determine the width on the screen.

Answer:

W=1055N

Explanation:

In order to solve this problem, we must first do a drawing of the situation so we can visualize theh problem better. (See attached picture)

In this problem, we will ignore the board's weight. As we can see in the free body diagram of the board, there are only three forces acting on the system and we can say the system is in vertical equilibrium, so from this we can say that:

[tex]\sum F=0[/tex]

so we can do the sum now:

[tex]F_{1}+F_{2}-W=0[/tex]

when solving for the Weight W, we get:

[tex]W=F_{1}+F_{2}[/tex]

and now we can substitute the given data, so we get:

W=410N+645N

W=1055N

Answer:

upward lift on an aircraft wing decreases as it gains altitude.

Explanation:

The governing equation of the Bernoulli's Principle is:

[tex]\frac{P}{\rho.g} +\frac{v^2}{2g} +z=constant[/tex]

where:

P = pressure of the fluid

g = acceleration due to gravity

[tex]\rho=[/tex] density of fluid

v = velocity of the fluid

z = height of fluid from the datum

But the lift force on the wings depends upon several aerodynamic factors given mathematically as:

[tex]L=cl. \rho.A.\frac{v^2}{2}[/tex]

where:

cl = experimental constant

[tex]\rho=[/tex] density of air

A = area of wing

v = velocity of the air

As we move up in the atmosphere the density of air reduces and thus the force of lift will eventually decrease, that is the reason why airplanes have a flight ceiling, an altitude above which it cannot fly.

To determine how far the beam can extend over the ledge, we need to consider the principle of equilibrium. The beam will be in equilibrium when the clockwise moments equal the counterclockwise moments. Calculating the moments, we find that the beam can extend 7.0 meters from the edge of the ledge.

To determine how far the beam can extend over the ledge, we need to consider the principle of equilibrium. The beam will be in equilibrium when the clockwise moments equal the counterclockwise moments. The moment is a force multiplied by the distance from the pivot point. In this case, the pivot point is the edge of the ledge and the force is the weight of the beam and the student.

Let's calculate the moments: The moment of the beam is 280 kg * 9.8 m/s² * x, where x is the distance from the edge of the ledge. The moment of the student is 50 kg * 9.8 m/s² * (10 m - x), where 10 m is the length of the beam.

Setting the clockwise moments equal to the counterclockwise moments, we have 280 kg * 9.8 m/s² * x = 50 kg * 9.8 m/s² * (10 m - x). Solving for x gives us x = 7.0 m. Therefore, the beam can extend 7.0 meters from the edge of the ledge.

https://brainly.com/question/30694482

#SPJ12

Final answer:

To ensure the beam does not tip, calculate the torque around the pivot at the ledge. The beam's weight produces a torque at its center of mass, while the student's weight produces a torque at the beam's end. Solving for equilibrium, the beam can extend 5.6 meters.

Explanation:

The problem presented involves a horizontal beam that a student wishes to extend over a ledge without it falling over due to its own weight and the weight of the student. To determine how far the beam can extend over the ledge, one must consider the torque that is acting on the beam around the pivot point, which is at the edge of the ledge. The beam must remain in rotational equilibrium, meaning the total torque around the pivot must be zero.

Let's assume the beam extends a distance x over the edge. The weight of the beam acts at its center of mass, which is x/2 from the pivot (edge of the ledge) if x is the length beyond the ledge. The moment (or torque) due to the beam's weight is (280 kg × 9.8 m/s² × x/2). The moment due to the student's weight at the end of the beam is (50 kg × 9.8 m/s² × x). For rotational equilibrium, these moments must be equal.

Setting the torques equal gives us: 280 kg × 9.8 m/s² × x/2 = 50 kg × 9.8 m/s² × x. Solving for x gives x = (280/100) × 2, so x must be 5.6 meters. Thus the beam can safely extend 5.6 meters over the ledge without tipping over.

To solve this problem it is necessary to apply the concepts related to Hooke's Law as well as Newton's second law.

By definition we know that Newton's second law is defined as

[tex]F = ma[/tex]

m = mass

a = Acceleration

By Hooke's law force is described as

[tex]F = k\Delta x[/tex]

Here,

k = Gravitational constant

x = Displacement

To develop this problem it is necessary to consider the two cases that give us concerning the elongation of the body.

The force to keep in balance must be preserved, so the force by the weight stipulated in Newton's second law and the force by Hooke's elongation are equal, so

[tex]k\Delta x = mg[/tex]

So for state 1 we have that with 0.2kg there is an elongation of 9.5cm

[tex]k (9.5-l)=0.2*g[/tex]

[tex]k (9.5-l)=0.2*9.8[/tex]

For state 2 we have that with 1Kg there is an elongation of 12cm

[tex]k (12-l)= 1*g[/tex]

[tex]k (12-l)= 1*9.8[/tex]

We have two equations with two unknowns therefore solving for both,

[tex]k = 3.136N/cm[/tex]

[tex]l = 8.877cm[/tex]

In this way converting the units,

[tex]k = 3.136N/cm(\frac{100cm}{1m})[/tex]

[tex]k = 313.6N/m[/tex]

Therefore the spring constant is 313.6N/m

Final answer:

To estimate the mechanical power in watts for a top climber, you can use the formula for power. The work done in climbing the stairs can be calculated as the product of the force applied and the distance covered. The joules of chemical energy expended during the stair climb can be calculated using the formula and converted to kilocalories.

Explanation:

To estimate the mechanical power in watts for a top climber, we can use the formula for power: P = W/t, where P is power, W is work, and t is time. The work done in climbing the stairs can be calculated as the product of the force applied and the distance covered. The force applied can be calculated as the product of the mass of the climber (80 kg) and the acceleration due to gravity (9.8 m/s²). The distance covered can be calculated as the product of the number of steps (2232) and the height of each step (0.18 m). Using these values, we can calculate the work done and then divide it by the time taken (20 min converted to seconds) to get the power in watts.

To calculate the joules of chemical energy expended during the stair climb, we can use the formula: E = P × t, where E is energy, P is power, and t is time. Using the power value calculated in part (a), and the time taken for the stair climb, we can calculate the energy expended in joules. To convert joules to kilocalories, we can divide the energy value in joules by the conversion factor of 4186 joules per kilocalorie.

Answer:

1327.43362 rev/s

Explanation:

[tex]I_i[/tex] = Initial moment of inertia = 2.4 kgm² (arms outstretched)

[tex]I_f[/tex] = Final moment of inertia = 0.904 kgm² (arms close)

[tex]\omega_f[/tex] = Final angular velocity

[tex]\omega_i[/tex] = Initial angular velocity = 0.5 rev/s

Here the angular momentum is conserved

[tex]I_i\omega_i=I_f\omega_f\\\Rightarrow \omega_f=\frac{I_i\omega_i}{I_f}\\\Rightarrow \omega_f=\frac{2.4\times 500}{0.904}\\\Rightarrow \omega_f=1327.43362\ rev/s[/tex]

The new rate of rotation is 1327.43362 rev/s

To solve this problem it is necessary to resort to the energy conservation equations, both kinetic and electrical.

By Coulomb's law, electrical energy is defined as

[tex]EE = \frac{kq_1q_2}{d}[/tex]

Where,

EE = Electrostatic potential energy

q= charge

d = distance between the charged particles

k = Coulomb's law constant

While kinetic energy is defined as

[tex]KE = \frac{1}{2} mv^2[/tex]

Where,

m= mass

v = velocity

There by conservation of energy we have that

EE= KE

There is not Initial kinetic energy, then

[tex]\frac{kq_1q_2}{d}-\frac{kq_1q_2}{d'} = 2*\frac{1}{2}mv_f^2[/tex]

[tex]\frac{kq_1q_2}{d}-\frac{kq_1q_2}{d'} = mv_f^2[/tex]

[tex]v_f^2= \frac{\frac{kq_1q_2}{d}-\frac{kq_1q_2}{d'} }{m}[/tex]

[tex]v_f = \sqrt{\frac{\frac{kq_1q_2}{d}-\frac{kq_1q_2}{d'}}{m}}[/tex]

Replacing with our values we have,

[tex]v_f = \sqrt{\frac{\frac{(9*10^9)(12*10^{-6})(60*10^{-6})}{1}-\frac{(9*10^9)(12*10^{-6})(60*10^{-6})}{3}}{5.50*10^{-15}}}[/tex]

[tex]v_f = 2.802*10^7m/s[/tex]

Therefore the speed of particle B at the instat when the particles are 3m apart is [tex]2.802*10^7m/s[/tex]

Answer:Aluminium

Explanation:

Given

Aluminium ball sinks after placing inside the water while wooden block floats.

Buoyancy on a body is given by

[tex]volume\ inside\ the\ water \times density\ of\ fluid\times g[/tex]

here [tex]\rho _{Al}>\rho _{water}[/tex]

thus aluminium ball sinks

but for

[tex]\rho _{wood}<\rho _{water}[/tex]

only a part of wood is under the water i.e. not whole volume is not under water therefore net buoyancy is less in case of wood

Final answer:

The gravitational force between two objects can be calculated using Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation, and for a 35.0 kg object to experience a net force of zero, it must be at a point where gravitational pulls from surrounding masses are balanced.

Explanation:

To solve the student’s question regarding the gravitational forces, we will use Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation which states the gravitational force (F) between two masses (m1 and m2) is directly proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance (r) between their centers. It is mathematically expressed as F = G * (m1 * m2) / r², where G is the gravitational constant (6.674 × 10-11 N·m²/kg²).

(a) To find the net gravitational force exerted on the 35.0 kg object placed midway between the two objects with masses of 130 kg and 430 kg and separated by 0.300 m, we calculate the gravitational force from each mass separately and then find the vector sum which in this case will just be the difference, as the object is placed in the middle.

(b) For the 35.0 kg object to experience a net force of zero, it has to be placed at a point where the gravitational force due to both masses equals each other. This can be found by setting the gravitational forces from each mass to the 35.0 kg object equal and solving for the distance from one of the masses. There is only one point between the two masses where this can occur as per the symmetry of the system.

To solve the problem it is necessary to apply the concepts related to heat flow,

The heat flux can be defined as

[tex]\frac{dQ}{dt} = H = \frac{kA\Delta T}{d}[/tex]

Where,

k = Thermal conductivity

A = Area of cross-sectional area

d = Length of the rod

[tex]\Delta T=[/tex] Temperature difference between the ends of the rod

[tex]k =388 W/m.\°C[/tex] Thermal conductivity of copper rod

[tex]A = 3.6 *10^{-4} m[/tex] Area of cross section of rod

[tex]\Delta T=100-0=100\°C[/tex] Temperature difference  

[tex]d=1.3m[/tex] length of rod

Replacing then,

[tex]H = \frac{kA\Delta T}{d}[/tex]

[tex]H = \frac{(388)(3.6 *10^{-4})(100)}{1.3}[/tex]

[tex]H=10.7446J[/tex]

From the definition of heat flow we know that this is also equivalent

[tex]H = \dot{m}*L[/tex]

Where,

[tex]\dot{m} =[/tex] Mass per second

[tex]L = 334J/g[/tex] Latent heat of fusion of ice

Re-arrange to find [tex]\dot{m},[/tex]

[tex]H = \dot{m}*L[/tex]

[tex]\dot{m}=\frac{L}{H}[/tex]

[tex]\dot{m}=\frac{334}{10.7446}[/tex]

[tex]\dot{m} = 31.08g/s[/tex]

[tex]\dot{m}= 0.032g/s[/tex]

Therefore the mass of ice per second that melts is 0.032g

Answer:

0.4 m/s

Explanation:

Law of conservation of momentum tell us that the change in momentum of the hammer will be equal to the change in momentum of the astronaut

change in momentum of hammer = change in momentum of astronaut

2 kg (14 m/s - 0 m/s) = 70 kg * (v-0)

                                v  = 0.4 m/s

Answer:

The speed of the astronaut toward the capsule is [tex]v_{a}=0.4\frac{m}{s}[/tex]

Explanation:

We have a system of two "particles" which are the astronaut and the hammer.

Initially, they are together and their relative velocities are zero, therefore the initial linear momentum is zero.

As there are no external forces to this system, the momentum is constant. This means that the initial momentum is equal to the final momentum:

[tex]0=p_{i}=p_{f}=m_{h}v_{h}-m_{a}v_{a}[/tex]

where the mass and velocity with h subscript corresponds to the hammer, and the ones with a subscript corresponds to the astronaut.

Then, we clear the velocity of the astronaut, and calculate

[tex]m_{h}v_{h}-m_{a}v_{a}\Leftrightarrow v_{a}=\frac{m_{h}}{m_{a}}v_{h}\Leftrightarrow v_{a}=\frac{2kg}{70kg}*14\frac{m}{s}=0.4\frac{m}{s}[/tex]

which is the speed of the astronaut toward the capsule.

To fix a grandfather clock that runs fast, you should lower the weight on the pendulum (option D), as this will increase the pendulum's period and slow down the clock's ticking rate.

If you have a grandfather clock at home that runs fast, you should make the pendulum swing slower to correct the time. To do this, you would lower the weight on the pendulum. The period of a pendulum, which determines the tick-tock rate of the clock, is directly affected by the length of the pendulum, not the weight, with a longer pendulum resulting in a slower tick-tock. Therefore, the correct adjustment would be option D: Lower the weight.

Adding or removing mass does not affect the period, so options C and E would not be effective. While decreasing the amplitude of swing might have a very small effect to speed up the pendulum (option B), this is not the standard method for adjusting the timekeeping of a clock and would not provide a consistent solution. Thus, the most accurate way to adjust the clock is by changing the length of the pendulum directly by lowering the weight.

Answer:

a. 4

Explanation:

Hi there!

The equation of kinetic energy (KE) is the following:

KE = 1/2 · m · v²

Where:

m = mass of the car.

v = speed of the car.

Let´s see how would be the equation if the velocity is doubled (2 · v)

KE2 = 1/2 · m · (2 · v)²

Distributing the exponent:

KE2 = 1/2 · m · 2² · v²

KE2 = 1/2 · m · 4 · v²

KE2 = 4 (1/2 · m · v²)      

KE2 = 4KE

Doubling the velocity increased the kinetic energy by 4.

Final answer:

The kinetic energy of a car increases by a factor of four when its speed is doubled due to the relationship KE = 1/2 m v^2, where kinetic energy is proportional to the square of the velocity.

Explanation:

When the speed of your car is doubled, the kinetic energy increases by a factor of four. This is because kinetic energy is proportional to the square of the velocity. The equation for kinetic energy (KE) is KE = 1/2 m v^2 where m is the mass and v is the velocity. If you double the velocity (v), the new kinetic energy will be 1/2 m (2v)^2 = 1/2 m (4v^2) = 4 times the original kinetic energy. Therefore, the correct answer to the question is a. 4.

Answer:

Explanation:

(a) Work done, W = 1.82 x 10^4 J

(b) internal energy, U = - 4.07 x 10^4 J ( as it decreases)

(c) According to the first law of thermodynamics  

Q = W + U

Q = 1.82 x 10^4 - 4.07 x 10^4

Q = - 2.25 x 10^4 J

The work done (W), the change in internal energy (ΔU), and heat transferred (Q) are 1.82 x 10^4 J, -4.07 x 10^4 J, and -2.25 x 10^4 J respectively as per the First Law of Thermodynamics.

The values listed in the question are for the work done (W), and the change in internal energy (U). In physics, these concepts are investigated under a principle called the First Law of Thermodynamics, which is basically a version of the law of conservation of energy as applied for thermal processes. As per this law, the change in internal energy (U) of a system is equal to the heat added to the system (Q) minus the work done by the system (W).

Hence, the formula can be given as: ΔU = Q - W.

If we substitute the given values:
-W = Work done = 1.82 x 10^4 J and ΔU = internal energy decreases = -4.07 x 10^4 J

Now, the formula can be rewritten as:
:-Q = ΔU + W = -4.07 x 10^4 J + 1.82 x 10^4 J = -2.25 x 10^4 J

Values:
(a) W = Work done = 1.82 x 10^4 J (Work done by the system is positive.)
(b) ΔU = Change in internal energy = -4.07 x 10^4 J (Decrease in internal energy is negative.)
(c) Q = Heat transferred = -2.25 x 10^4 J (As per the convention, heat added to the system is positive. Here, it's negative, which means heat is lost from the system.)

https://brainly.com/question/35546325\

#SPJ3

Answer:

[tex]I_s=5.8A[/tex]

Explanation:

Not considering any type of losses in the transformer, the input power in the primary is equal to the output power in the secondary:

[tex]P_p=P_s[/tex]

So:

[tex]V_p*I_p=V_s*I_s[/tex]

Where:

[tex]V_p=Voltage\hspace{3}in\hspace{3}the\hspace{3}primary\hspace{3}coil\\V_s=Voltage\hspace{3}in\hspace{3}the\hspace{3}secondary\hspace{3}coil\\I_p=Current\hspace{3}in\hspace{3}the\hspace{3}primary\hspace{3}coil\\I_s=Current\hspace{3}in\hspace{3}the\hspace{3}secondary\hspace{3}coil[/tex]

Solving for [tex]I_s[/tex]

[tex]I_s=\frac{V_p*I_p}{V_s}[/tex]

Replacing the data provided:

[tex]I_s=\frac{110*29}{550} =5.8A[/tex]

To solve this problem it is necessary to apply the concepts related to the wave function of a particle and the probability of finding the particle in the ground state.

The wave function is given as

[tex]\phi = \sqrt{\frac{2}{L}} sin(\frac{\pi x}{L})[/tex]

Therefore the probability of finding the particle must be

[tex]P = |\phi(x)^2| \Delta X[/tex]

[tex]P = |\sqrt{\frac{2}{L}} sin(\frac{\pi x}{L})|^2 \Delta x[/tex]

[tex]P = (\frac{2}{L})(sin(\frac{\pi x}{L}))^2\Delta x[/tex]

[tex]P = (\frac{2}{L})(sin(\frac{\pi (0.7L)}{L}))^2 (0.0002L)[/tex]

[tex]P = 2*(sin(0.7\pi))^2(0.0002)[/tex]

[tex]P = 2.618*10^{-4}[/tex]

Therefore the probability is [tex]2.618*10^{-4}[/tex]

The probability that the particle is in a window [tex]\(\Delta x = 0.0002L\)[/tex]wide with its midpoint at [tex]\(x = 0.700L\)[/tex] is given by [tex]\(P = |\psi(0.700L)|^2 \Delta x\).[/tex]

In quantum mechanics, the probability of finding a particle in a certain position is given by the square of the wave function's magnitude at that position, multiplied by the width of the position interval. For a particle in the ground state, the wave function \(\psi(x)\) is given by the solution to the Schrödinger equation for the particular potential well the particle is in. For a simple one-dimensional infinite potential well, the ground state wave function is a half-sine wave.

Given that the particle is in the ground state and the window[tex]\(\Delta x\)[/tex] is very small, we can make the approximation that the wave function \(\psi(x)\) does not change significantly over this interval.

 Since we are assuming [tex]\(\psi(x)\[/tex]is constant over [tex]\(\Delta x\)[/tex], the integral simplifies to the product of [tex]\(|\psi(0.700L)|^2\)[/tex] and the width of the interval [tex]\(\Delta x\):[/tex]

[tex]\[ P = \int_{0.700L - \frac{\Delta x}{2}}^{0.700L + \frac{\Delta x}{2}} |\psi(x)|^2 dx \approx |\psi(0.700L)|^2 \Delta x \][/tex]

 This is a standard result for the probability of finding a particle in a small interval around a point in quantum mechanics when the wave function is approximately constant over that interval. The actual value of [tex]\(|\psi(0.700L)|^2\)[/tex] would depend on the specific form of the wave function for the ground state of the system in question.

However, the integral does not need to be evaluated explicitly due to the assumption of a constant wave function over the small interval [tex]\(\Delta x\).[/tex]

Answer:

s = 0.9689 m

Explanation:

given,

Height of fall of paratroopers = 362 m

speed of impact = 52 m/s

mass of paratrooper = 86 Kg

From from snow on him = 1.2 ✕ 10⁵ N

now using formula

F = m a

a = F/m

[tex]a = \dfrac{1.2 \times 10^5}{86}[/tex]

[tex]a =1395.35\ m/s^2[/tex]

Using equation of motion

v² = u² + 2 a s

[tex]s =\dfrac{v^2}{2a}[/tex]

[tex]s =\dfrac{52^2}{2\times 1395.35}[/tex]

s = 0.9689 m

The minimum depth of snow that would have stooped him is  s = 0.9689 m

Answer:

[tex]x= 45.46[/tex]

Explanation:

given,

mean of hospital waiting (μ) = 38.12  min

standard deviation (σ) = 8.63 min

worst waiting time = 20%  

the are will be same as the = 100 - 20%

                                             = 80%

we have to determine the z- value according to 80% or 0.80

using z-table

     z-value = 0.85

now, using formula

       [tex]Z = \dfrac{x-\mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

       [tex]0.85 = \dfrac{x-38.12}{8.63}[/tex]

       [tex]x-38.12 = 0.85\times {8.63}[/tex]

       [tex]x= 45.46[/tex]

waiting times follow a normal distribution with

Mean, \mu=38.12Mean,μ=38.12

Standard\ deviation,\sigma=8.63Standard deviation,σ=8.63

Longer waiting times are worse than shorter waiting times. Hence the worst 20% of wait times are wait times on the right tail of the distribution. The inferred level of confidence is 0.80.

The z value corresponding to the right tail probability of 0.2 is

Z=0.85Z=0.85

But

Z = \frac{x-\mu}{\sigma}Z=

σ

x−μ

​

x =Z*\sigma +\mux=Z∗σ+μ

=0.85 * 8.63 +38.12 =45.4555=0.85∗8.63+38.12=45.4555

answer:

the shortest wait time that would still be in the worst 20% of wait times is 45.4555 minutes

Answer: 0.36 m

Explanation:

By definition, the x coordinate of the center of mass of the system obeys the following equation:

Xm = (m1x1 + m2x2 + …….+ mnxn) / m1+m2 +……+ mn

Neglecting the mass of the rod, and choosing our origin to be coincident with the location of the full bucket, we can write the following expression for the X coordinate of the center of mass (Assuming that both masses are aligned over the x-axis, so y-coordinates are zero):

Xm = 0.25 mb . 1.8 m / (1+0.25) mb

Simplifying mb, we get:

Xm= 0.36 m (to the right of the full bucket).

Final answer:

To find the center of mass of the system, use the principle of moments to balance the torques produced by the full and empty buckets. The distance from the fulcrum to the center of mass can be calculated using the equation for torque.

Explanation:

To find the center of mass of the system, we can use the principle of moments. The center of mass of the system will be located at a distance from the full bucket that balances the torques produced by the two buckets.

Let's denote the distance from the fulcrum to the center of mass of the system as x. The torques produced by the full and empty buckets can be calculated using the formula, Torque = Force * Distance.

Since the empty bucket has 0.25 the inertia of the full bucket, the torque produced by the empty bucket will be 0.25 times the torque produced by the full bucket. Setting up the equation using the principle of moments, we can solve for x.

Answer:

253.65259 seconds

Explanation:

f' = Approaching frequency = 460 Hz

f = Receding frequency = 410 Hz

v = Speed of sound in air = 343 m/s

v' = Speed of truck

Doppler effect

[tex]\frac{f'}{f}=\frac{v+v'}{v-v'}\\\Rightarrow 460\left(343-v'\right)=410\left(343+v'\right)\\\Rightarrow 157780-460v'-157780=140630+410v'-157780\\\Rightarrow v'=19.712\ m/s[/tex]

The distance is 5 km

Time = Distance / Speed

[tex]Time=\frac{5000}{19.712}=253.65259\ s[/tex]

Time will it take to hear the jet from your position is 253.65259 seconds

Answer:

[tex]v=28m/s[/tex]

Explanation:

The vertical component of the normal force must cancel out with the weight of the car taking the curve:

[tex]N_y=W[/tex]

[tex]Ncos\theta=mg[/tex]

(Notice it has to be cos and not sin, because the angle [tex]\theta[/tex] is the slope, for null slope [tex]N_y=Ncos(0)=N[/tex], as it should be).

The horizontal component of the normal force must be the centripetal force, that is:

[tex]N_x=F_{cp}[/tex]

[tex]Nsen\theta=ma_{cp}[/tex]

[tex](\frac{mg}{cos\theta})sin\theta=m\frac{v^2}{r}[/tex]

[tex]gtan\theta=\frac{v^2}{r}[/tex]

[tex]v=\sqrt{grtan\theta}=\sqrt{(9.8m/s^2)(80m)tan(45^{\circ})}=28m/s[/tex]

To find the safe speed on a banked curve without sliding up or down, calculate the square root of a specific formula involving the radius, acceleration due to gravity, and the tangent of the angle.

To find the safe speed with which to take the curve without sliding up or down, we need to consider the force components acting on the vehicle. The gravitational force can be split into two components: the vertical component and the horizontal component. The vertical component helps keep the vehicle on the road, while the horizontal component provides the centripetal force needed to keep the vehicle moving in a curved path. By setting up an equation involving the gravitational force, the normal force, and the friction force, we can calculate the safe speed as the square root of the product of the radius of the curve, the acceleration due to gravity, and the tangent of the banking angle.

https://brainly.com/question/37982154

#SPJ3

Answer:

a. The plane speeds up but the cargo does not change speed.

Explanation:

Just to make it clear, the question is as follows from what I understand.

A small glider is coasting horizontally when suddenly a very heavy piece of cargo falls out of the bottom of the plane.  You can neglect air resistance.

Just after the cargo has fallen out:

a. The plane speeds up but the cargo does not change speed.

b. The cargo slows down but the plane does not change speed.

c. Neither the cargo nor the plane change speed.

d. The plane speeds up and the cargo slows down.

e. Both the cargo and the plane speed up.

And we are requested to choose the right answer under the given conditions. We know the glider has no motor, then it must be in free fall movement, then it is experiencing some force that pulls it to the from due to the gravity effect on it, and a force in general is calculated by

F=m*a, m:= mass of the object, a:= acceleration.

Here we are only considering the horizontal effect of the forces, then since the mass is reduced the acceleration must increase to compensate and maintain  the equilibrium of the forces, then the glider being lighter can travel faster due to the acceleration. On the other hand by the time the cargo left the glider there was no acceleration and the speed it had at the moment he left the plane continues, then the cargo does not change its speed, then horizontally speaking the answer would be a. The plane speeds up but the cargo does not change speed.

Objects fall at the same rate due to gravity, both cargo and plane speed up after cargo falls, air resistance affects falling speeds. Correct option is c. both the cargo and the plane speed up.

Gravity causes all objects to fall towards Earth at the same rate in the absence of air resistance.

When a heavy piece of cargo falls out of a coasting plane, both the cargo and the plane speed up due to the conservation of momentum.

Air resistance can cause lighter objects to fall slower than heavier objects due to the opposing force it exerts on objects moving through the air.

Answer:

B. Movement of regolith down a slope under the force of gravity

It is also known as slope movement or mass movement.

Answer:

T = 8.19 s ,  [tex]v_{max}[/tex]  = 23 m / s

Explanation:

In the simple harmonic motion the equation that describes them is

    y = A cos wt

Acceleration can be found by derivatives

    a = d²y / dt²

   v = dy / dt = - Aw sin wt

   a= d²y / dt² = - A w² cos wt

For maximum acceleration cosWT = + -1

    [tex]a_{max}[/tex] = -A w2

    w = RA ([tex]a_{max}[/tex]/ A)

    w = RA (1.8 9.8 / 30.0)

    w = 0.767 rad / s

The angular velocity is related to the frequency

    w = 2π f

     f = 1 / T

    w = 2π / T

    T = 2π / w

    T = 2π / 0.767

    T = 8.19 s

For maximum speed the sin wt = + -1

    [tex]v_{max}[/tex] = A w

    [tex]v_{max}[/tex]  = 30.0 0.767

   [tex]v_{max}[/tex]  = 23 m / s

The average induced emf in the coil, when it is rotated in Earth's Magnetic field, is 15 Volts.

The question is about the change in magnetic flux, which induces an electromotive force (emf) in a loop according to Faraday's law. The formula to calculate the change in magnetic flux is ΔФ = B × A × N, where B is the magnetic field, A is the area, and N is the number of coil turns.

Given B = 6.0×10⁻⁵T, A = 25cm² = 2.5 × 10⁻³ m² (since 1 m² = 10,000 cm²), and N=1000 turns, the change in magnetic flux equals to 0.15 Wb. According to Faraday's law, which is |emf| = |dФ/dt|, and dФ/dt is the rate of change of magnetic flux, thus |emf| = |0.15 / 0.010|= 15 V. Therefore, the average emf induced in the coil is 15 Volts.

https://brainly.com/question/31745336

#SPJ3

Answer:

A. an increase in the height of the sound wave

Explanation:

Volume of the sound is measured by its intensity

So here we know that

intensity is directly depends on the square of the amplitude of the sound wave

so here as intensity depends on the loudness of the sound given as

[tex]L = 10 Log(\frac{I}{I_o})[/tex]

so here as the loudness of sound will increase then the intensity will increase and hence the amplitude of the sound will also increase

So correct answer will be

A. an increase in the height of the sound wave

Answer:

a) [tex]\lambda=2.95x10^{-6}m[/tex]

b) infrared region

Explanation:

Photon energy is the "energy carried by a single photon. This amount of energy is directly proportional to the photon's electromagnetic frequency and is inversely proportional to the wavelength. If we have higher the photon's frequency then we have higher its energy. Equivalently, with longer the photon's wavelength, we have lower energy".

Part a

Is provide that the smallest amount of energy that is needed to dissociate a molecule of a material on this case 0.42eV. We know that the energy of the photon is equal to:

[tex]E=hf[/tex]

Where h is the Planck's Constant. By the other hand the know that [tex]c=f\lambda[/tex] and if we solve for f we have:

[tex]f=\frac{c}{\lambda}[/tex]

If we replace the last equation into the E formula we got:

[tex]E=h\frac{c}{\lambda}[/tex]

And if we solve for [tex]\lambda[/tex] we got:

[tex]\lambda =\frac{hc}{E}[/tex]

Using the value of the constant [tex]h=4.136x10^{-15} eVs[/tex] we have this:

[tex]\lambda=\frac{4.136x10^{15}eVs (3x10^8 \frac{m}{s})}{0.42eV}=2.95x10^{-6}m[/tex]

[tex]\lambda=2.95x10^{-6}m[/tex]

Part b

If we see the figure attached, with the red arrow, the value for the wavelenght obtained from part a) is on the infrared region, since is in the order of [tex]10^{-6}m[/tex]

Answer:

3.3619 Nm

54.27472 rad

182.46618 J

86.88 W

Explanation:

[tex]L_i[/tex] = Initial angular momentum = 7.2 kgm²/s

[tex]L_f[/tex] = Final angular momentum = 0.14 kgm²/s

I = Moment of inertia = 0.142 kgm²

t = Time taken

Average torque is given by

[tex]\tau_{av}=\frac{L_f-L_i}{\Delta t}\\\Rightarrow \tau_{av}=\frac{0.14-7.2}{2.1}\\\Rightarrow \tau_{av}=-3.3619\ Nm[/tex]

Magnitude of the average torque acting on the flywheel is 3.3619 Nm

Angular speed is given by

[tex]\omega_i=\frac{L_i}{I}[/tex]

Angular acceleration is given by

[tex]\alpha=\frac{\tau}{I}[/tex]

From the equation of rotational motion

[tex]\theta=\omega_it+\frac{1}{2}\alpha t^2\\\Rightarrow \theta=\frac{L_i}{I}\times t+\frac{1}{2}\times \frac{\tau}{I}\times t^2\\\Rightarrow \theta=\frac{7.2}{0.142}\times 2.1+\frac{1}{2}\times \frac{-3.3619}{0.142}\times 2.1^2\\\Rightarrow \theta=54.27472\ rad[/tex]

The angle the flywheel turns is 54.27472 rad

Work done is given by

[tex]W=\tau\theta\\\Rightarrow W=-3.3619\times 54.27472\\\Rightarrow W=-182.46618\ J[/tex]

Work done on the wheel is 182.46618 J

Power is given by

[tex]P=\frac{W}{t}\\\Rightarrow P=\frac{-182.46618}{2.1}\\\Rightarrow P=-86.88\ W[/tex]

The magnitude of the average power done on the flywheel is 86.88 W

Answer:

a. 86.7 Nm

b. b. By making sure her foot is on the outermost edge of the pedal aat all times

Explanation:

a. Torque = force  * perpendicular distance

                = (52 kg * 9.81 m/s²)  * 0.17 m

                = 86.7204 Nm

b. Torque can be increased by increasing the force exerted peperndicular to the distance from the fulcrum or by increasing the distance itself. Since the person cannot increase their weight, they have to maximize the distance from the fulcrum

The maximum torque is 86.7204 Nm and the rider can increase this by putting int leg on the edge of the paddle.  

It is defined as the force that causes the rotation of an object on an axis. It is measured in Nm.

[tex]\tau = rF\sin\theta[/tex]

[tex]\tau[/tex] = torque

[tex]r\\[/tex] = radius

[tex]F[/tex] = force = mg = (52 kg x  9.81 m/s²) = 510.12 N

= angle between F and the lever arm

Torque = force  x perpendicular distance

Put the values,  

Torque= 510.12 N x 0.17 m  

Torque = 86.7204 Nm

B) Since the torque is directly proportional to the force and perpendicular distance. Hence, the rider must increase the perpendicular distance in order to increase the torque.

Therefore, the maximum torque is 86.7204 Nm and the rider can increase this by putting int leg on the edge of the paddle.

To know more about Torque:

https://brainly.com/question/25705121