Which of the following is true of the Civil War?
ut of
Select one:
O a. The chances of a wounded soldier surviving were remarkably good.
b. Because the armies usually fought from well-defended trenches and seldom moved, casualties remained remarkably low.
c. Modern weapons (les) combined outdated tactics are one explanation for the high number of casualties.
O d. Despite the bloodshed, soldiers in the war continued to romanticize the fighting

Political change in Latin America:

The politics changed majorly in Latin America as the older structures were being removed and inhabitants were setting out to programs after post colonial rule. Although the major difficulty of the decade was faced  to establish the legitimacy of the new governments. In Iberian region the greater extent of powers lie in the hands of monarch.

Only the monarch had the authority over the church, the military and various other institutions in the regions of Latin America. Gradually the leaders of Latin America stated adopting traditional political methods which were inspired by northern Europe and United States, there by started establishing republics across the region.

States can usurp the authority of the federal government to regulate interstate commerce.

Explanation:

Marshall Court is nothing but Supreme court, popularly known after John Marshall who was the Fourth Chief Justice of American Nation. John Marshall died in the court itself serving as Chief Justice.

His time over the court has increased the judicial branches' power also the National government's power. In 1824 his court ruled a major order in the Gibbons v. Ogden. He orders that States can regulate interstate tradings with the help of the Fed Government.

This order literally strengthened the national government's power by increasing its role over the state. No one intended questions against the Government since the ruling actually provided the power to control it.

Debating the suspension of civil liberties involves a complex balance between national security and individual rights, often examined through historical precedents and constitutional protections. Court rulings continue to shape the understanding of this balance, striving to protect both public safety and personal freedoms.

The question of whether the suspension of civil liberties is justified in certain situations such as wartime or during national crises is a complex and often controversial issue. Historical instances, such as the suspension of habeas corpus during the Civil War and the enactment of the USA PATRIOT Act post-9/11, demonstrate the government's response to perceived threats. When considering the suspension of civil liberties, it's essential to balance national security needs against the protection of individual rights and freedoms. The Constitution lays the groundwork for this balance, particularly through the Bill of Rights, which defends civil liberties such as freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, and protection from unreasonable searches and seizures.

On one hand, some argue that in extreme scenarios, like during invasions or rebellions when the public's safety is at risk, limited and temporary suspensions may be necessary to ensure national security. On the other, there are concerns about the potential abuse of power and the long-term erosion of civil liberties. Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes's statement about the limit of rights serves as a metaphor for the need for balance between personal freedoms and the impact on others, emphasizing the delicate equilibrium between individual rights and the safety and rights of the community.

Ultimately, the legitimacy of suspending civil liberties is a matter of ongoing debate, often hashed out in legal challenges and Supreme Court rulings. Cases that deal with these issues continue to shape the interpretation and understanding of civil liberties in modern society.

Final answer:

Yes, the suspension of civil liberties can be justified in some situations, particularly during times of war or national emergencies. It is important to strike a balance between national security and civil liberties, ensuring that any restrictions are reasonable, proportionate, and temporary.

Explanation:

Yes, the suspension of civil liberties can be justified in some situations, particularly during times of war or national emergencies. While it is important to protect individual rights and freedoms, the government also has a responsibility to ensure the safety and security of its citizens. In such situations, the restriction of civil liberties may be necessary to prevent potential threats and maintain public order.

One example of the suspension of civil liberties is the United States' actions during World War I, where certain protections were temporarily suspended to combat espionage and dissent. Another example is the USA PATRIOT Act, which was enacted after the 9/11 terrorist attacks and expanded the government's surveillance and law enforcement powers in order to prevent future attacks.

However, it is crucial to strike a balance between national security and civil liberties, and ensure that any restrictions are reasonable, proportionate, and temporary. Safeguards, oversight mechanisms, and judicial review should be in place to prevent abuse of power and protect the rights of individuals.

Answer:

x intercept = -2 or (-2,0)

11x - 11(0) = -22

11x = -22

x = -22 / 11

x = -2

y intercept = 2 or (2,0)

11(0) - 11y = -22

-11y = -22

y = -22 / -11

y = 2

Answer: B. By preventing Bank runs.

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) was created in 1933 as a response to the bank failures that occurred during the Great Depression. The primary goal of the FDIC was to provide deposit insurance to depositors in order to prevent bank runs and restore confidence in the banking system. Thus, option B is correct.

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) is a United States government agency that was created in 1933 as a response to the bank failures that occurred during the Great Depression. The primary goal of the FDIC is to provide deposit insurance to depositors in order to protect their money in the event that a bank fails.

Under the FDIC, depositors' accounts are insured up to a certain amount, which means that if a bank fails, the depositors will be able to recover their money. In addition to providing deposit insurance, the FDIC also works to promote the safety and soundness of the banking system by supervising and regulating banks and by taking action to prevent bank failures.

The FDIC is an independent agency of the federal government and is funded through premiums that are paid by banks that are insured by the FDIC.

Learn more about FDIC here:

https://brainly.com/question/30711963

#SPJ5

Answer:

Ancient Greece left the West a rich legacy. Part of that heritage is democracy, a representative system of government that differed from tyranny, the common system of political organization of ancient Greek states. It was born in Athens. From Rome, we got the institution of the Senate, a deliberative body that held much power in ancient Rome. The classical Greco-Roman culture is the bedrock of Western culture.  

Explanation:

A.  To bring together scientists interested in understanding natural phenomena.

Explanation:

Benjamin Franklin established the American Philosophical Society in 1743 in hopes of bringing together scientists from around the world to understand natural phenomena. Franklin wanted to use this group for the main idea of "promoting useful knowledge", and getting out different ideas in order to better comprehend scientific happenings around us.

Answer:

its right for plato too

Explanation:

Answer:

C. Jews were banned from Jerusalem

Hope this helped!

Answer:

Your answer is C

Explanation:

The Jews were banned from Jerusalem. This is because the Romans didn't want the Jews in Jerusalem because they discriminated against Jews.

Warren Harding's presidency impacted American foreign policy, xenophobia, and business through a policy of isolationism, nativist immigration restrictions, and pro-business policies.

Warren Harding's presidency impacted American foreign policy, xenophobia, and business, as he focused on a return to 'normalcy' after World War I.

https://brainly.com/question/1291396

#SPJ11

Answer:

The historical context of Frederick Douglass on Dred scott decision is that he was the leader of the anti-slavery movement in north and he was a escaped slave.  

Explanation:

Destruction of European infrastructure from World War I combined with a

global economic depression made many countries weak and easy prey for

totalitarian governments.

Answer: Option D

Explanation:

Totalitarian government is that form of government where the rule is in the hands of the state. Private sector has no say in the working of the country at all and all the powers are in the hands of the state.

After the end of world war 1, there was a lot of destruction of infrastructure of Europe and there was depression in the economy and this made the government of those countries taking all the powers for the governing of the countries.

Answer:

Spain; the Americas

Explanation:

shwbwhwhwhwhwhwhwhwwhwhegwhwgwgeveve

Answer:

Span, the americas

Explanation:

right on plato

The Enlightenment was a series of ideas from the 17th and 18th-century that held that human reason was the key to human emancipation and autonomy in a radical assertion of human capacity for self-improvement. Several authors who identified with this worldview wrote about how freedom could be achieved through the use of reason, kept and encouraged by governments.

The Enlightenment author most influent on the Declaration of Independence was Montesquieu (1689-1755). He claimed that separation of powers between Executive, Legislature, and Judiciary would create a scenario where none of them had enough space to expand in an despotic (authoritarian) manner. Believing that every man with power would want to abuse it, he created this tripartite division where power should stop power. This idea is heavily present in the US Constitution through the checks and balances system.

Answer: B On edg

Explanation:

Answer:

The answer is B

Explanation: I am taking edge and we did a project on this.

Answer:

Third

Explanation:

Answer: B: third amendment

According to https://en.wikipedia.org it is the third amendment that states "No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law."

Answer:

The battle of the Alamo is considered a turning point because it led to execution of Santa Anna.

Option: (B)

Explanation:

Answer:

He amassed a great amount of land, either a bit more or less than Great Britain's golden age

Explanation.

He also was the exact opposite of the Spartans as they thought men should have full beards whereas Alex and his men were clean shaven

Answer:

They are among the best artists ever born. Both Italians, they were rivals and disliked each other. At the time when Michelangelo was born, Leonardo was already becoming a famous painter. It is thought that the younger genius copied his older opponent, owing to the fact that some of Michelangelo’s paintings are similar to sketches found in Leonardo’s notes. Nevertheless, their lives are somewhat similar and they were both trying to win the title of the best artist in Italy.

Leonardo Da Vinci and Michelangelo belong to the period of the High Renaissance. They both spent almost all their lives living with their fathers in religious families. Leonardo learned how to paint from his father himself. On the other hand, Michelangelo didn’t have such support and had to leave his father’s house in order to become a painter. Once he became an artist he decided to devote his talent to sculpting and less painting, which made him Leonardo’s biggest rival. Besides art, they both had worked on other things. While Leonardo was a scientist, Michelangelo was an architect and wrote poetry. Another interest that connects them is anatomy. Michelangelo was a sculptor, hence he had to know everything about anatomical structures of human and animals. In the later years of his life, Leonardo had a passion and desire to know every piece of a human’s body, so he dissected human corpses and left us with over 200 pages of advanced drawings of the human’s body.

Both Leonardo and Michelangelo are best known for their paintings and sculptures. Almost all their work abounds in religious characters and scenes. However, Leonardo’s paintings are full of scenes related to the birth of Jesus Christ, while Michelangelo was reviving scenes from the Bible. Michelangelo’s greatest masterpiece is the sculpture of David, the character from the Bible. Leonardo’s affection to Jesus can be seen from quite a few paintings and murals that he had painted, like “The Last Supper” and “Virgin on the Rocks”. However, neither one of these artists enjoyed painting nature alone. Their works of art are mostly portraits or scenes with characters. Even so, they used different styles of painting. Leonardo used a style called chiaroscuro, which is also called 3D painting and a specific technique, “sfumato”, which gives the paintings a shadowy quality. His portraits look vivid and the picture looks different from every side. He used this technique in creating his most famous painting – “Mona Lisa”. Unlike him, Michelangelo was fond of fresco painting, which means painting on wet plaster.

These two artists are considered to be the greatest religious painters. Nevertheless, they weren’t fully inspired by religion. Actually, most of their inspiration comes from their families. As seen, Leonardo’s paintings are full of feminine characters. Even though he lived with his father, he loved his mother more and never lost the memory of her. When at the beginning of the 16 century he was given an assignment to paint Mona Lisa, he accepted and always carried the painting with him because the girl in the picture reminded him of his mother. On the contrary, Michelangelo, who was inspired by his strict father, whom he loved even though he expelled him from home, wanted to paint strong men. Except people, Leonardo and Michelangelo inserted other scenes in their paintings. Da Vinci was in love with nature, thus his paintings are full of light and vitality. Michelangelo, on the other hand, adds strength and battle elements in his works. He praised chivalry and war. He has made a sculpture of horse where the animal looks furious and ready for battle, whereas Leonardo’s sculpture of a horse looks friendly and calm.

Leonardo and Michelangelo left us artworks, some of which were destroyed or lost and other unfinished, but all equally beautiful and ahead of their time. These great men were not just artists, but innovators as well. Leonardo Da Vinci came up with the idea of building a helicopter and Michelangelo designed buildings while writing poems for his beloved. Even though they disliked each other, they were very much alike. They both were unpopular among the people until their last years of life because their behavior was considered to be strange. However, they have been praised ever since and their work is still admired.

Explanation:

Answer:

Weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation

Each state only had one vote in Congress, regardless of size. Congress had not have the power to tax. Congress did not have the power to regulate foreign and interstate commerce. There was no executive branch to enforce any acts passed by Congress. ✨

Explanation:

It is form website.

Answer:

The Industrial Revolution of the 18th-19th centuries is characterized by the shift from an agricultural economy to an industrial economy based on machines, extensive use of resources such as coal, water, and of technological inventions - steam engine, the railway, etc. -. Major social changes are urbanization and migration from the countryside to cities; a major social and economic event of the industrial era is the establishement of factories in cities, the basis of mass production. From a sociological point of view, industralization meant the rise and growth of two important classes: the capitalists (those who owned the means of production), and of the workers, factory employees. Those times saw the deepening of social inequalities and income levels, labor exploitation. The development of new social classes led to the creation of new political parties and movements.

Explanation:

Both revolutions hold their importance through the innovation of tools, the ability for women and children to work, the implementation of a governing system, and social class division. The revolutions were different in their locations, as the agricultural Neolithic revolution needed to be in open areas with agriculture supporting weather, and the factories along coastal states so they could transport their goods easier.

Answer:D

Explanation:by withholding tax money from the national government

States under the Articles of Confederation showcased power over the national government by not attending meetings and withholding tax money.

Under the Articles of Confederation, the states show that their power was greater than that of the national government by:

By not attending conventions and other meetings: States demonstrated their autonomy by choosing not to participate in gatherings that could potentially strengthen the national government's authority.

By withholding tax money from the national government: States exerted their power by refusing to provide financial support to the central government, showcasing their independence.

By following laws set up by the national government: States adhering to laws established by the national government would signify compliance with federal authority, not a demonstration of state power.

Earning a reputation for efficiency and integrity, he was reelected in 1930. In 1934, Truman was elected to the U.S. Senate. As a senator, he supported President Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal programs, designed to help lift the nation out of the Great Depression, which began in 1929 and lasted about a decade.

Answer: The Bill limits the power of the monarchy by creating a separation of powers, therefore enhancing and protecting the rights of citizens.

Explanation:

Answer:

the answer is C

Explanation:

i took the usa test prep it was the only one i missed

McCarthy argued that communism was expanding globally by highlighting its growth in countries like China and North Korea along with suspicions of espionage within the U.S. State Department. He also pointed to the increase in the Communist Party's popularity during the Great Depression, arguing that it indicated global appeal. However, his lack of concrete evidence led to his downfall during the Army-McCarthy hearings.

Senator Joseph McCarthy argued that communism was a growing force across the globe by pointing to events and trends in post-World War II politics. He emphasized the spread of communism as countries like China and North Korea adopted it, referring notably to the establishment of the People's Republic of China by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in 1949. McCarthy also claimed that the U.S. State Department was filled with communists.

Moreover, McCarthy highlighted Soviet espionages in the United States and asserted that spies had passed atomic bomb-making secrets to the Soviet Union and sympathizers in the U.S. were concealing pertinent information. Furthermore, McCarthy seized upon the fact that the popularity of the Communist Party heightened during the Great Depression as those affected by economic disparity sought solace in the economic equality promised by communism, indicating that the ideology had substantial appeal worldwide.

While McCarthy's anti-communist campaign, known as McCarthyism, opened a tense chapter in the Cold War, his allegations were frequently based on intimidation and innuendo rather than solid evidence. Such tactics led eventually to his political downfall during the Army-McCarthy hearings in 1954 when his approaches were rejected by the American public, and he was censured by the Senate.

https://brainly.com/question/13999952

#SPJ12

The evidences that McCarthy provided to argue that communism is a growing force around the world were: The Lee List, The Tydings Committee Hearings, The Wheeling Speech, Use of FBI Files etc.

McCarthy's evidence to argue that communism was a growing force around the world was primarily based on a series of speeches and hearings where he presented lists of individuals he claimed were members of the Communist Party or were sympathetic to communist causes.

Some key points and pieces of evidence he used included:

1. The Lee List: In February 1950, McCarthy claimed to have a list of 205 known communists who were working in the State Department. This list was later referred to as the Lee List, named after Susan Lee, a researcher for the Republican National Committee who had compiled information on potential communists in the government.

2. The Tydings Committee Hearings: McCarthy was given the opportunity to present his evidence before the Tydings Committee, a subcommittee of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. During these hearings, McCarthy made numerous accusations but provided little concrete evidence to support his claims.

3. The Wheeling Speech: McCarthy's most famous speech was delivered in Wheeling, West Virginia, where he claimed to have a list of 57 (sometimes reported as 205) communists in the State Department. The actual number varied in his accounts, and the specifics of the list were never substantiated.

4. Use of FBI Files: McCarthy often cited information from FBI files, which were not publicly available, to bolster his claims. However, the accuracy and relevance of this information were frequently called into question.

5. Alleged Security Breaches: McCarthy pointed to several high-profile espionage cases, such as those of Alger Hiss and the Rosenbergs, as evidence of widespread communist infiltration. These cases, while not directly linked to McCarthy's lists, contributed to the public's fear of communism.

6. Exploiting the Cold War Climate: McCarthy's claims played on the fears of the American public during the early years of the Cold War, a time when the Soviet Union was expanding its influence and the United States was engaged in a global struggle against communism.

7. Media Attention: McCarthy was adept at using the media to spread his accusations. The sensational nature of his claims ensured that they received widespread coverage, which in turn increased public concern about communist subversion.

It is important to note that McCarthy's methods were highly controversial, and his claims were often unsubstantiated or based on flimsy evidence. His tactics of smearing individuals and institutions with accusations of communist sympathies without providing clear proof led to the term McCarthyism, which is now used to describe the practice of making unfounded accusations to further a political agenda. Despite the lack of credible evidence, McCarthy's influence was significant, and his actions contributed to a climate of fear and suspicion in the United States during the 1950s.

Answer:

The main gain for French peasantry was the elimination of the feudal system by the revolutionary regime following the overthrowing of king Louis XVI; it had been a longtime aspiration of theirs. They could finally acquire full rights of landowners and have a free hand to increase their holdings. Another important gain was the abolition of the tithe, an obligation to contribute to the Church´s coffers with one tenth of their income, a legal tax: That money was used to maintain the clergy and churches.

Explanation:

The enlightenment influenced the youth, the artists, cultures.

Explanation:

Enlightenment was the period in the European countries in the seventeenth century. When enlightenment happened in the society of Europe, there were changes in the culture of Europe where the youth got aware about the ideas of liberty and freedom.

Women of the society also stood up to improve their conditions and there was change in the art of the continent and new philosophies also began. Scientists like Isaac Newton also challenged the older facts and way of living life

The incorrect cause of World War II among the options is the USSR invasion of Poland (C), since this was an event that happened in tandem with German actions and was not a primary cause of the war.

While it is true that the USSR did invade Poland, this occurred simultaneously with the German invasion, as part of a secret protocol in the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact that divided Eastern Europe into German and Soviet spheres of influence. The primary causes behind the outbreak of World War II include Japanese expansionism, which threatened other nations' colonies and interests in Asia.

The Treaty of Versailles, which caused widespread resentment in Germany due to its harsh terms. Additionally, UK and France's appeasement of Nazi Germany, particularly during events such as the annexation of Austria (Anschluss) and the takeover of the Sudetenland in Czechoslovakia, emboldened Hitler and paved the way for further aggression that would lead to the war.

Explanation: Explanation: They were hard due to multiple reasons. King George imposed unfair taxes on the colonists and brought slavery into the new land.  Women did more work than servants because the colonies were just born. They did not have enough laborers to work. There were no farmers to grow food. Many homes had gardens of vegetables.  They did not have enough supplies. They had to drink brackish water.  Many colonists were murdered by the Native Americans. They also died due to starvation.

Brackish water: fresh water from a river mixed with saline water from the sea. It can happen when a river and an ocean meet.

Final answer:

Colonial life was centered on subsistence farming and was marked by simplicity and scarcity. Today's life, shaped by the Industrial Revolution, urbanization, and technology, offers far greater conveniences, health care, and material wealth.

Explanation:

Life during colonial times was vastly different compared to life today. Before the Industrial Revolution, the majority of people lived as farmers in rural communities, with life centered around subsistence agriculture and simple, homemade tools. They had minimal access to education, worked from dawn to dusk, lived in simple homes, and suffered from diseases with little medical help. In contrast, modern life is marked by advanced technology, industrialization, and urbanization, providing numerous conveniences and a much higher standard of living. The shift over time has been profound, particularly in terms of healthcare advancements, life expectancies, and material comforts.

Indeed, the transformation from the scarcity and hardships of the early 19th-century to the abundance and comfort of the 21st-century is dramatic. The rich array of goods and services available today, from year-round fresh produce to advanced medical procedures, contrasts sharply with the more austere lives of even the wealthiest individuals of the past.

Answer:

Answer: B. The French and Indian War was part of the Seven Years' War.

Explanation:

These names are actually two names of the same conflict. The spark of the war was French expansion into the Ohio River Valley and conflicting claims of the British colonies. The war went on for 7 years. It ended with the signing of the Treaty of Paris of 1763. France ceded Canada to the British but kept its Western Indies sugar islands. Britain also got Florida from Spain, which got Louisiana from the French.  

Answer: from 1900 one can observe steady growing questioning of liberalism, liberal values and all the Enlightenment trends with European civilization (liberal and democratic paradigm was introduced by Enlightenment and French revolution). This questioning was stimulated by 1) social Darwinism and consequently by biologization of social sciences, 2) anti-semitism (present everywhere in Europe), 3) there was a profound need of some religious need (reaction against secular Enlightenment values and mechanicist and materialist paradigm typical for Enlightenment, Marxism, communism) .....this need was partly satisfied by the discovery of the unconscious ....fascists became great partisans of "bodily revolution" (Drieu La Rochelle), believed that the "body instinct" is more true than "cerebral intellect" ...all that was part of  a revolt against reason, cult of irrationalism 4) there was demand (in results from 3) for a strong leader, 5) Italian sociology of elites (Lombroso, Michels and others). Aggression was viewed as vital, life was viewed as something that should be based on instinct and vitality and not rational speculation.

Explanation: fascism and question of power (and its unconscious roots) was strongly present in European culture during the first part of the 20th century.

The Great Depression in the United States, and large-scale industrialization are two events that accelerated the rise of fascism and aggression after World War I.

The Great Depression was a global economic shock that affected almost every country on the planet. It was a period of economic depression that emerged following a significant drop in stock prices in the United States.

Two events that accelerated the rise of aggressive nationalism in Europe after World War I were the Great Depression in the United States, which triggered a worldwide depression marked by inflation and widespread poverty, and competition among European powers to accelerate their economies, which led to large-scale industrialization.

Therefore, great depression and industrialization led to the rise of fascism and aggression after World War I.

To learn more about Great Depression, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/29771180

#SPJ2