Can someone look this over ASAP<3



Lennie Small suffers from an intellectual disability. He is made fun of and called names such as dumb. Every one of us is different in their way. However, people with intellectual disabilities were seen as different, but as dumb, uneducated and are made fun of. In the story Of Mice And Men by John Steinbeck, he created conflict to show the reader the way people with disabilities were treated in the 1930s. John Steinbeck's "Of Mice and Men" brings awareness to the treatment of individuals with special needs. The treatment of people with special needs such as intellectual disabilities has continued to get better in the US in the decades since the Great Depression. Treatment of people with intellectual disabilities in many other countries has been slower to evolve.
In the 1700s and 1800s, people started making places to house people with special needs. These places are dirty and overcrowded. In the article, Disability History: Early and Shifting Attitudes of Treatment. It states, "They were also unregulated. Men and women lived in the same space with little oversight. Living at a poor farm was typically involuntary". In comparison to the 2000s, people changed the thought of throwing people in dirty and crowded homes. Now we don't have as many of these houses for disabled people. According to the text, Early and Shifting Attitudes of Treatment, "Changes in treatment of people with disabilities have shifted largely due to the emergence of the disability rights movement in the early 20th century". This proves People had learned everyone should be treated equally no matter if you have disabilities or not.
People with disabilities are unknown as unhealthy and defective. In the article, Society’s Attitude Toward People with Disabilities it states, "Prior to the twentieth century, social attitudes reflected the view that persons with disabilities were unhealthy, defective and deviant. For centuries, society as a whole treated these people as objects of fear and pity". To put in different words, people were no fan of having others with disabilities in the community. They never treated them like everyone else because they were known for being unhealthy and deviant. The author stated, "there was a strong sentiment toward increased employment of persons with disabilities; 92% polled believed that employment of persons with disabilities would be economically beneficial to society. There is a strong trend toward acceptance. These attitudes are in sharp contrast to the prevailing attitudes of the first half of this century". Furthermore, Others with disabilities have problems getting jobs and learning because they never have the chance to.

This treatment does not only happen in the USA. Many other countries have this problem. One example is Russia, In Russia People with disabilities, are taken places without consent and barely get the support they need. In the text, Russia: Adult Prospects Dim for Youth with Disabilities the author states," orphanages where children with disabilities grow up often transfer them to closed state institutions for adults when they reach 18 without their consent, Human Rights Watch said today. Those who do move into the community often do not receive the support they need to live independently". In other words, The people of Russia have disabilities too but they should be able to speak for themselves and have the right support. To continue, in the same article Russia: Adult Prospects Dim for Youth with Disabilities the author states, "Others said that orphanage directors pressured them to sign paperwork agreeing to be placed in adult institutions". Furthermore, There people that just want to live a normal life have been pressured to signing papers to send them away to adult Institutions. These people should be treated like everyone else.


In conclusion, treatment for people with intellectual disabilities has changed since the 1700s. There are still problems in other countries with the treatment of people with disabilities but in the US we have changed. In the US we have more health care and better resources then we did in the 1930s. These resources help them get jobs and stay healthy.

Answer: It will leave the next day.

Explanation:

In this poem by Edgar Allan Poe, the speaker deals with a loss of his lover, when he is visited by a strange guest - a raven that repeats the same word - "nevermore."

The raven lands on a bust of Pallas, and, when the narrator asks him about his name, the raven only utters: "nevermore." The narrator then assumes that the raven will leave him just like his friends did:

"On the morrow he will leave me, as my Hopes have flown before.”

On the morrow is an Old English expression that has a meaning "the next day." The correct answer is, thus, that the speaker says that the raven will leave the next day.

Answer:

a

Explanation:

Answer:

c

Explanation:

The old man refers to his mother as his teacher and comforter, while 'my mother's gate' is likely a metaphor for a transition or passage in his life guided by his mother.

In the texts, the old man refers to his mother as the person who reveals all things to him and loves him above all else. It's not explicitly stated what the 'mother's gate' symbolizes, but within many literary works, gates often represent a passage or transition. Therefore, 'my mother's gate' could be seen as a metaphor for the transition from ignorance to knowledge, or from childhood to adulthood, guided and supported by his mother's teachings. The mentioned text sections evoke strong feelings and experiences of learning, growth, remorse, longing, and deep familial love, hinting at the powerful influence the mother figure has on the old man's life.

https://brainly.com/question/39735535

#SPJ12

The old man likely calls his wife 'mother' in a term of endearment, suggesting her role as the mother of his children and 'my mother's gate' metaphorically represents their home.

The old man in the text refers to his wife as 'mother,' a term of endearment that suggests she is the mother of his children. When he mentions 'my mother's gate,' he could be speaking metaphorically about his own home or the domestic sphere that his wife presides over, which has traditionally been associated with motherhood. This use of 'mother' as a title by older husbands towards their wives was common in past eras and may signify respect and affection. Additionally, the term 'gate' could symbolize an entry or threshold that one must cross, implying a protective or boundary-setting role that the wife plays in the household.

https://brainly.com/question/34208572

#SPJ2

The statement that introduces a new counterclaim to the author's position is "The use of solar energy is especially limited in areas that do not get regular sunlight." This introduces the limitations of solar energy in certain geographical locations as a counterclaim to the author's positive view on solar energy.

The student's essay broadly promotes the use of renewable energy sources, focusing specifically on solar energy as a key to solving the energy crisis. It mentions its sustainability and cleanliness as advantages and acknowledges the cost of equipment as a challenge. However, the statement about the limitations of solar energy in areas with less sunlight presents a new challenge or counterclaim, highlighting that solar energy, while promising, may not be universally applicable across all regions due to varying levels of sunlight reception. This is suggestive of the inherent geographic and environmental limitations associated with employing solar energy solutions on a global scale.

Answer:

Um..I am sorry if this is not right but, I put: " We moved into out new house on August 13, 2007"

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

The narrator of 'Everything That Rises Must Converge' is a third-person limited perspective focused on Julian, examining themes of racism, personal identity, and societal change in the American South.

The question concerns the narrator of Everything That Rises Must Converge, a short story collection by Flannery O'Connor. The title story specifically showcases a third-person limited point of view, focusing largely on the perspectives and internal thoughts of Julian, the main character. This narrative approach allows readers to closely examine Julian's complex relationship with his mother and his internal conflicts about societal changes and personal identity during the American South's tumultuous era of integration.

Narrator and Point of View are crucial in understanding how a story conveys its themes, how characters develop, and how readers connect with the narrative. In O'Connor's story, the narrator's focus on Julian's perspective adds depth to the exploration of themes such as racism, generational conflict, and self-realization. It illustrates how personal biases and experiences can shape one's view of the world, emphasizing the story's exploration of human flaws and the possibility of redemption or revelation.

The story's narrative technique and the relatability of its characters contribute significantly to its impact, proving the importance of narrative perspective in storytelling. Through the use of a closely focused third-person narrative, O'Connor beautifully reveals the internal struggles and societal observations of her characters, making the story a profound exploration of human nature and social change.

Answer: B) I think. Since I started honors, I have learned just to go with my gut, and my text evidence.

Explanation:

Answer:

I believe the answer is A.

Explanation:

I may not be right but it makes the best sense.

Your question is missing the passage that includes the participial phrases and the noun. I've found the complete question online. It is as follows:

Hoping for a few scraps of food, the tiny puppy scooted closer to the table where the man was eating. She placed her paws on the edge of the man's seat to signal that she was hungry. The man gently eased the whining puppy back onto the floor. "No begging," he scolded. Pushing his plate away from the edge of the table, the puppy walked away from the man.

Which participle or participial phrase modifies the wrong noun?

A.“hoping for a few scraps of food”

B.“whining”

C.“no begging”

D.“pushing his plate away from the edge of the table”

Answer:

The participial phrase the modifies the wrong noun is:

D. pushing his plate away from the edge of the table

Explanation:

From the passage we learn that the puppy is a female. It is referred to with the pronoun "she". The puppy approaches a man who is eating at a table. At the end of the passage, we read "No begging," he scolded. Pushing his plate away from the edge of the table, the puppy walked away from the man. The participial phrase "pushing his plate away from the edge of the table" comes right before the noun "puppy" and is separated from it by a comma. That makes it seem as if it refers to the puppy. However, we know that the puppy should not be the one to push the plate away. It should be the man, who does not want to give the puppy his food. To have the participial phrase modify the correct noun, the punctuation should be changed as follows:

"No begging," he scolded, pushing his plate away from the edge of the table. The puppy walked away from the man.

It is now clear that the man was the one pushing the plate, and not the puppy.

Answer:

D: “pushing his plate away from the edge of the table”

Explanation:

Got it correct the first time on Edge.

Answer:

The correct answer is the option "by, buy"

Explanation:

Homophones are words that have the same pronunciation but they differ in meaning or spelling.

In the example provided and according to the context of the sentence, the first option is the preposition "by" that means beside or near.

The second option is the verb "buy".

In both cases the pronunciation is the same but their meaning and spelling are different.

The correct homophones are "by, buy"

This refers to the type of words that sounds alike because they have the same pronunciation.

Hence, we can see that from the given sentence, there is the narration of Jiya and his sojourn to the dentist's office and the homophone that is correct is by, buy.

Read more about homophones here:

https://brainly.com/question/7449238

#SPJ5

Answer:

1)when

2)because

3)since

4)when

5)when

6)when

7)because

8)as

9)since

10)after

The adverb clause in each sentence below.

An adverb clause is a group of words that functions as an adverb within a sentence. It typically begins with a subordinating conjunction (e.g., when, because, since, after, before) and modifies a verb, adjective, or adverb, providing additional information about time, cause, condition, manner, or purpose.

In the sentences provided earlier, the adverb clauses are:

when I finish work (modifying the verb "attend")

because their oxygen was gone (modifying the verb "came up")

Since he got a puppy (modifying the adjective "calm")

when the judge entered the room (modifying the verb "stood")

When you complete the exam (modifying the verb "turn")

When I woke up (modifying the verb "was")

because it costs too much (modifying the verb "go")

as our team leaves the court (modifying the verb "Give")

Since she did not call me (modifying the verb "attend")

After we walked home (modifying the verb "made")

To know more about adverb here

https://brainly.com/question/912194

#SPJ2

Let's examine the options.

a) the Greeks, unlike the Cyclops, value meeting each other

This is the indirect sense we get from the passage, based on the way the Greeks express disdain toward the Cyclops for not meeting each other. The Greeks say the "Cyclopes have...no meeting, no consultation or old tribal ways" after calling them "giants, louts, without a law to bless them" and saying they live in ignorance.

b) the Greeks shun meetings and consultation

From the way the passage condemns the Cyclops for having "no muster and no meeting, no consultation...", we can tell the Greeks shun not having meetings and consultation. This option is wrong.

c) the Greeks, unlike Cyclops, live alone in caves

Based on the text - "Cyclopes have no muster and no meeting,...each one dwells in his own mountain cave" - Cyclops, not Greeks, are the ones living in caves. This option is wrong.

d) the Cyclops have taught the Greeks the value of society

We get the sense the Cyclops themselves don't know the value of society - in fact, they shut the world out ("each one dwells in his own mountain cave"). They are called ignorant louts "indifferent to what others do". This option is wrong.

a) the Greeks, unlike the Cyclops, value meeting each other

Answer:

The voting age in America should not be changed from 18 to 16. This is because there are many immature citizen teens out there who would not look further into detail about who they would vote for. Most would just pick based off of things they like about the person. They wouldn't look into further detail. And besides your not an adult until your 18 years of age or in the twenty age. Sixteen year old teens are smart yes, but still too young to be voting especially for something that could change everyone's lives. If you were to let an 16 year old be allowed to vote your life and the rest of the world rests in their hands basically. 18 year old teens are more mature about this topic and more aware of what needs to be done to vote for someone. They look into things and find out more about that person.

Explanation:

Final answer:

The debate over lowering the voting age to 16 involves examining the history of the Twenty-Sixth Amendment, the current responsibilities and rights of 16-year-olds, and the potential impact on political engagement and civic involvement. Proponents argue that active young citizens deserve a voice, while critics raise concerns about maturity and political knowledge.

Explanation:

Discussing the Voting Age in the United States

The debate over whether to lower the voting age to 16 or 17 in the United States is multifaceted, involving history, legal precedents, and sociopolitical arguments. Historically, the voting age was reduced from 21 to 18 during the Vietnam War era, culminating in the ratification of the Twenty-Sixth Amendment in 1971. Proponents of a further reduction to 16 or 17 suggest that teenagers engaged in activities like driving, working, and paying taxes should have the right to vote. Critics, however, question whether individuals at this age have the maturity and understanding necessary to make informed decisions in elections. There is precedent for such changes at the local level, with cities like Takoma Park, Maryland, and San Francisco, California, allowing 16-year-olds to vote in local elections.

Arguments in favor of lowering the age often center on the idea that these young citizens are already contributing to the society and economy, can be affected by the policies enacted by officials, and may be inspired to greater political engagement and civic involvement. On the other hand, arguments against focus on concerns regarding the cognitive and emotional development of teenagers and whether they possess adequate knowledge of the political system. It's also worth noting that the idea extends beyond just voting and into whether young people should also have the ability to run for office.

Ultimately, whether or not to change the voting age is a question of balancing the right to participate in democracy with ensuring that voters are equipped to make decisions that will impact society.

I think A, B, and D

Explanation:

Answer:

A, B, and D

Explanation:

Answer:

Definitely intriguing characters. When characters are intriguing you feel for them and are interested in the story more.

Answer:

B. A character

A story has five basic but important elements. These five components are: the characters,  the setting, the plot, the conflict, and the resolution. These essential elements keep the  story running smoothly and allow the action to develop in a logical way that the reader can follow.

Explanation:

CHARACTERS : They are the individuals that the story is about. The author should introduce them in the story with enough information that the reader can visualize each person.  Every story should have a main character since he/she determines the way the plot will develop and is usually who will solve the problem the  story centers upon.

SETTING :  The location of the action. An author should describe the environment or  surroundings of the story in such detail that the reader feels that he or she can picture the  scene.

PLOT : is the actual story around which the entire book is based. A plot should have a  very clear beginning, middle, and end.

CONFLICT : Every story has a conflict to solve. The plot is centered on this conflict and the ways in  which the characters attempt to resolve the problem.

RESOLUTION : The solution to the problem is the way the action is resolved.

When great teachers are mentioned, most people think of biology instructors, football  coaches, Girl Scout leaders, and others in similar positions. However, some of the greatest teachers  may be individuals not normally classified as teachers. Roger, a character in the short story “Thank

You, M’am” by Langston Hughes, encounters such an unusual teacher on a city sidewalk. Because

she is a fearless, trustful, and generous woman, Mrs. Jones teaches Roger a lesson he will remember.

Roger is a would-be thief. At about eleven o’clock one night, he runs up behind Mrs. Jones

and tries to snatch her purse. When he falls down on the sidewalk, Mrs. Jones “simply turned around

and kicked him right square in his blue jeaned sitter” (78). While some women would have avoided

confrontation with a stranger under similar circumstances, Mrs. Jones does not. She shook Roger

“until his teeth rattled” and then demanded, “Pick up my pocketbook boy, and give it here” (78).

Mrs. Jones shows no fear in her encounter with Roger.

Not only does Mrs. Jones display courage, but she also proves to be a trusting person. She

decides that Roger needs to wash and to eat and that she will take him to her home in order to do so.

“I got a great mind to wash your face for you,” (78) she tells Roger. “You ought to be my son. I

would teach you right from wrong. Least I can do right now is to wash your face. Are you hungry?”

(78). In just a few words, she assumes the role of a teacher and a mother substitute. She not only

takes Roger home but she also continues to display a trusting nature once they arrive. When she gets

up to prepare supper, Mrs. Jones “did not watch the boy to see if he was going to run now, nor did

she watch her purse which she left behind her on the daybed” (79). Roger begins to respond to Mrs.

Jones in a positive way. Hughes tells the readers that Roger “did not want to be mistrusted now”

(79). Her trust in Roger is beginning to create a relationship between them.

Mrs. Jones’s generosity to Roger extends beyond her sharing a meal with him. Roger tells

her that he tried to steal her purse in order to get money for a pair of blue suede shoes. Mrs. Jones  

then does a remarkable thing. She takes money from her purse and says, “Now here, take this ten

dollars and buy yourself some blue suede shoes. And next time, do not make the mistake of latching

onto my pocketbook nor nobody else’s—because shoes come by devilish like that will burn your

feet” (78). She bids him goodnight, and Roger wants to express his gratitude but cannot find words

more eloquent than a simple “thank you.” However, Hughes leaves the readers with the definite

impression that Roger has been profoundly touched by the generosity of Mrs. Jones.

Some teachers are brilliant instructors due to their superior education. Others make excellent

teachers because they are adept as communicators. Mrs. Luella Bates Washington Jones emerges not

from a university but rather from a hotel beauty shop to become Roger’s teacher. Her courage, trust,

and generosity communicate more to Roger than mere words ever could.

Answer:

I've chosen Daisy Buchanan from the novel "The Great Gatsby" by F. Scott Fitzgerald.

Explanation:

Daisy is the love interest of Jay Gatsby. She is a young, beautiful woman, who comes from a wealthy family and lives a frivolous life. She and her friends accept reality and society as they are, and know how to make the best out of situations. Daisy only thinks of herself and what is best for her and her lifestyle, even if that takes a toll on other people's happiness.

Even though Daisy does deserve to receive better treatment from her husband Tom - after all, he cheats on her constantly -, the story makes it clear she does not indeed regret marrying him. Daisy is a superficial woman, whose desire is to live richly and comfortably. Love is a lower priority and does not overcome the preference for luxuries. Tom, her husband, does not give her love, but gives her the luxury she wants. Gatsby can offer her love and riches, but leaving the world she knows so well to run away with him is not something Daisy is willing to do. In the end, while Gatsby is killed as a consequence of his love for her, Daisy and her husband do what they know how to do best: move to a different place while leaving a trail of destruction behind them.

Traction is a pulling force applied to a skeletal structure, used in physical therapy to treat injuries or improve mobility.

The correct definition of traction in this context is a pulling force applied to a skeletal structure.

Traction is a treatment method used in physical therapy to apply a pulling force to a person's body, typically to alleviate pain or restore mobility.

In the given sentence, traction is being used to treat Malcolm's neck after his car accident.

Answer:

B.Overseers kept this information from their slaves.

Explanation:

Frederick Douglass doesn't know how old he is because the slave masters never told him.

Answer:

b c d e

Explanation:

Answer:

The phrases that help you figure out the meaning of penury are:

-There was no money for medicine, no money for even a night's lodging.

-Not only was there no money for food, but he had been unable to locate even a charity soup kitchen for a meal.

Explanation:

In the first sentence the author says that "He had never before known such penury" and then in the next sentences he explains the situation, so those sentences help you figure out the meaning of the word that is being very poor as the author says that there was no money for medicine, lodging or food.

Answer:what is the story?

Explanation:

The term 'cabal' typically refers to a secret group or faction working towards a common goal, often for personal interests or to influence outcomes unbeknownst to those outside the group.

The word 'cabal' in English is generally used to describe a secret political clique or faction. It originates from the Hebrew 'Kabbalah' which means 'to receive'. Without knowing the exact context within paragraph 2, it's safe to suggest that 'cabal' is likely used to describe a group of people united in some close design, usually to promote their private views or interests in an ideology, state, or other community, often by intrigue and usually unbeknownst to those outside their group.

For example, in a novel, if a group of characters form a cabal, they might be secretly plotting against another character or working behind the scenes to influence an outcome in their favor.

https://brainly.com/question/541794

#SPJ12

Answer: The answer is C

Explanation: This because he is the leader of Britain. He helped plan battles and keep the morale of his nation up.

As prime minister, he led Great Britain to victory against the Axis powers: role Winston Churchill play in World War II. Thus, option C is the correct option.

Winston Churchill played a pivotal role in World War II as the prime minister of Great Britain. His leadership and unwavering determination were instrumental in guiding the nation through one of its most challenging periods. Churchill's inspiring speeches rallied the British people, bolstering their morale and resolve. He formed a strong alliance with the Allied powers, particularly the United States and the Soviet Union, to combat the Axis powers.

Churchill's strategic decisions, such as the evacuation of Dunkirk and the defense of Britain during the Battle of Britain, proved crucial to the eventual victory. His steadfastness and unwavering commitment to freedom and democracy made him a symbol of resilience and determination during the war.

Learn more about Winston Churchill here:

https://brainly.com/question/946683

#SPJ5

Answer:

C) Gudrun is a daydreamer; Ursula is practical.

Explanation:

"The Rainbow" by David Herbert Lawrence deals with the three generations of the Brangwen family, from Tom Brangwen to Ursula Brangwen. Practically coming from a farming family, the story ends with Ursula becoming a teacher, far improved from the farming background. This novel shows the development and urbanization of Britain.

The passage in the question is from the last and most extended part of the novel about the granddaughter Ursula. This part revolves around her struggle to find fulfillment for her passions. But unable to get anything, the novel ends with Ursula seeing a rainbow towering over the earth, a symbol of a new beginning, just like in from the Biblical rainbow over the ark after the flood. The specific passage shows that Gudrun is a daydreamer while Ursula is the practical one of the sisters.

Answer:

A

Explanation:

on USAtestprep

Parson Hooper is portrayed as mysterious through the symbolic black veil, the narrator's tone is somber, and a central idea revolves around the consequences of concealed sin.

Parson Hooper in Nathaniel Hawthorne's "The Minister's Black Veil" is characterized as an enigmatic and mysterious figure. The primary textual evidence supporting this characterization is his decision to wear a black veil that obscures his face, causing bewilderment and curiosity among the townspeople. The veil becomes a symbol of hidden sin and the consequences of moral transgressions. Hooper's choice to don the black veil transforms him into a symbol of the human inclination to conceal personal flaws.

The narrator's tone in the story is somber and reflective. Textual evidence supporting this includes phrases such as "darkness and confusion" and "gloomiest shadow." The tone contributes to the story's overall atmosphere of melancholy and contemplation.

A possible central idea of the story revolves around the consequences of concealed sin and the impact of judgment on individual lives. Parson Hooper's symbolic act of wearing the black veil serves as a metaphor for the hidden guilt that individuals carry and the societal ostracism that follows such revelations.

Answer:

I think it would be c

Explanation:

hope this nelped

Answer:

helps you figure out important points from your reading

Answer:

They look so sad and upset they are just waiting to get a forever home

They look like they want live to see another day :(

Explanation:

i hope this is useful :(

Answer:

According to the image, the explicit meaning is that cats are piled up, due to their positions and the text. The implicit meaning is the protest inference that they are transmitting, like ''we are piled, we need more space to live''.

Answer:

D.The DSLR's larger sensor makes it a bigger camera than the CSC.

Explanation:

The text states:

"The main difference between a DSLR and a CSC is that the DSLR has a full-sized sensor,

which means it fits in a much larger body. The CSC uses a mirrorless system, which makes for a lighter,

smaller camera."

Therefore, the major difference between the two cameras is that the DSLR is larger than the CSC.

The primary distinction between DSLR and CSC cameras lies in the DSLR's larger sensor size, resulting in better picture quality but a bigger camera body, while CSCs are more portable due to their compact, mirrorless design. So, option a is correct.

The main difference between a Digital Single-Lens Reflex (DSLR) and a Compact System Camera (CSC) is that a DSLR typically features a larger sensor, which leads to a bigger camera body, while a CSC utilizes a mirrorless system making it lighter and more compact. Although both types of cameras can produce high-quality images, DSLRs often offer superior picture quality due to their larger sensors. Conversely, the smaller and lighter CSCs are more convenient to carry and serve as a step up for amateur photographers transitioning from point-and-shoot cameras.

Answer:

id say A

Explanation:

Answer:

The correct answer is letter D.

Explanation:

Amy used to missjudge her mother by her 'limited' English. Nowadays, she sees that the word 'limited' conveys prejudice and prevents people to see behind it. Also, the use of the word is wrong because there is no such thing as limited English when it comes to a native speaker. We have to think of an appropriate use of English in context.

Answer:

1. infer -  deduce or conclude from evidence or reasoning

2. analyze - break something down into its parts ... means

3. explain - provide reasons for what happened ... effects

4. evidence - facts, statements, or details ... observation

5. cite - quote and give credit to a source ... evidence

Mercutio's final speech showcases his character as a humorous individual, as he jokes about his death. He also exhibits a morbid pessimism and directs blame towards the feuding families for his fate, rather than abstract concepts like destiny or fate.

Mercutio's speech in Act 3, Scene 1 of Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet reveals several aspects of his character. A) He cracks jokes even as he is dying, which shows that his character is indeed that of a comic, someone who retains his wit and humor even in the face of death. D) He views his fate as being caused by the error of people, not abstract powers like 'fate'. He blames the feud between the two houses for his untimely end, emphasizing human error over destiny. Lastly, C) He is morbidly pessimistic as he bitterly denounces the Capulet and Montague families and predicts his own imminent death.