do banks always charge the same interest rate on new and used cars

Periodic data is useful when analyzing trends or patterns that repeat at regular intervals over time.

Examples include analyzing sales data by month, tracking website traffic by day of the week, or monitoring seasonal fluctuations in temperature.

Example 1: Monthly Sales Data

To illustrate the usefulness of periodic data, let's consider a retail business that tracks its monthly sales over the course of a year. Suppose the sales data for January to December are as follows:

January: $50,000

February: $55,000

March: $60,000

April: $65,000

May: $70,000

June: $80,000

July: $85,000

August: $90,000

September: $95,000

October: $100,000

November: $110,000

December: $120,000

To analyze this periodic data, we can calculate the average monthly sales:

Total Sales = $50,000 + $55,000 + ... + $120,000

           = $780,000

Number of Months = 12

Average Monthly Sales = Total Sales / Number of Months

                     = $780,000 / 12

                     = $65,000

So, the average monthly sales for this retail business is $65,000.

Periodic data, such as monthly sales figures, allows businesses to identify seasonal trends, peak periods, and areas for improvement. By analyzing this data, businesses can make informed decisions about inventory management, marketing strategies, and resource allocation. In this example, calculating the average monthly sales helps the business understand its typical revenue stream and plan accordingly. Additionally, periodic data analysis enables businesses to compare performance across different time periods and track progress towards goals. Therefore, periodic data is essential for strategic planning and optimizing business operations.

Complete question:

When is periodic data useful? Give examples to support your answer.

Answer:

x + 64 = 110

x = 46

Step-by-step explanation:

You need to isolate the x, so you need to subtract 64 from 110 ( which is 46 ). By you doing that, you need to now subtract 64 from 64 itself.

Would look like this:  x + 64   = 110

                                      -  64   - 64

Which would leave you with x = 46

[tex] |\Omega|=6\\
|A|=3\\\\
P(A)=\dfrac{3}{6}=\dfrac{1}{2}=50\% [/tex]

The answer is D... :)

Tire size affects the number of rotations, with larger tires making fewer rotations for a given distance. However, tire size doesn't directly influence when you need to replace your tires, which depends more on usage and wear factors. Changing tire size can impact vehicle performance.

The tire size directly affects the number of rotations a wheel makes in traversing a particular distance. A wheel's circumference, which is related to its size, determines how far it will travel in one rotation. A larger wheel will have a greater circumference, meaning it will cover a greater distance in one rotation. Therefore, for a given distance, larger tires will complete fewer rotations than smaller ones.

Switching to a different tire size wouldn't necessarily cause you to have to switch your tires sooner. Tire wear is primarily affected by factors like driving habits, road conditions, tire material, and maintenance, not rotational frequency. However, changing your tire size can affect vehicle mechanics and performance, including speedometer and odometer accuracy, so it's important to consult a professional before making such changes.

https://brainly.com/question/31883553

#SPJ12

Station P is approximately 15.0 km away from the fire.

Given that:

A right triangle with sides PQ: 20.0 km

And QF: 15.0 km

Where F is the location of the fire.

To find how far station P is from the fire, use trigonometry.

Let's call the distance from station P to the fire x km.

The angle between PQ and PF is given.

Using the trigonometric tangent function:

tan(angle) = opposite/adjacent

In this case, the opposite side is QF , and the adjacent side is PQ.

tan(angle) = 15.0 km / 20.0 km

Now, let's find the value of the angle:

angle = arctan(15.0 km / 20.0 km)

Using a calculator to get,

angle ≈ 36.87 degrees

Now, use trigonometry again to find x:

tan(36.87 degrees) = x / 20.0 km

x ≈ 20.0 km * tan(36.87 degrees)

x ≈ 20.0 km * 0.75

x ≈ 15.0 km

So, station P is approximately 15.0 km away from the fire.

Learn more about Trigonometry here:

https://brainly.com/question/12068045

#SPJ4

The distance from station P to the fire is approximately 21.23 km.

To find the distance from station P to the fire, we can use trigonometry. Since the ranger at station Q sees the fire at an angle between the line PQ and the line from P to the fire, we can consider the triangle created by station P, station Q, and the fire.

Using the tangent function, we can determine this distance:

tan(angle) = opposite / adjacent

Let x be the distance from station P to the fire:

tan(angle) = x / 15

Solving for x, we get:

x = 15 * tan(angle)

Now, we need to find the angle between the lines PQ and the line from P to the fire. Since the triangle created by station P, station Q, and the fire is a right triangle, we can use the inverse tangent function to find the angle:

angle = arctan(opposite / adjacent) = arctan(20 / 15)

Using a calculator, we find that the angle is approximately 53.13 degrees.

Substituting this angle into the equation for x, we have:

x = 15 * tan(53.13)

Solving for x, we get:

x ≈ 21.23 km

To find when Rate 2 becomes cheaper, we set up an equation based on the rates given and solve for the number of miles. After solving the equation, we find that Rate 2 becomes cheaper after more than 800 miles.

The subject of your question is Mathematics, specifically, it's in the domain of linear equations. To find out the number of miles you should drive to pay less by taking rate 2, we need to determine when the total cost of rate 1 is more than rate 2.

Let's call M the number of miles you would drive. The cost for rate 1 would be $64 + $0.16 * M, and the cost for rate 2 would be $128 + $0.08 * M. To find when rate 2 is cheaper, we would set up the equation: 64 + 0.16 * M > 128 + 0.08 * M. By solving this equation for M, we can find the miles where rate 2 becomes cheaper. This equation simplifies to 0.08M > 64 and thus M > 800. So, for more than 800 miles, rate 2 would be the more cost-effective option.

https://brainly.com/question/32634451

#SPJ2

The third derivative of f(x) at x=0 is −150.

To find the third derivative of f(x) at x=0, we can utilize the Maclaurin series representation of f(x).

The Maclaurin series expansion of f(x) is given by:

[tex]f(x)=1-9 x+16 x^2-25 x^3+\ldots[/tex]

To find the third derivative, we first need to determine the general expression for the n-th term of the Maclaurin series. The general term of the series is given by:

[tex]f^{(n)}(0) \frac{x^n}{n !}[/tex]

where [tex]f^{(n)}(0)[/tex] represents the n-th derivative of f(x) evaluated at x=0.

Now, let's identify the pattern in the given series:

[tex]f(x)=1-9 x+16 x^2-25 x^3+\ldots[/tex]

The coefficients of the terms seem to be perfect squares of consecutive odd numbers. So, the n-th term of the series can be expressed as [tex](-1)^n \cdot(2 n+1)^2[/tex].

Now, let's find the third derivative of f(x) at x=0:

[tex]\begin{aligned}& f(x)=1-9 x+16 x^2-25 x^3+\ldots \\& f^{\prime}(x)=-9+32 x-75 x^2+\ldots \\& f^{\prime \prime}(x)=32-150 x+\ldots \\& f^{\prime \prime \prime}(x)=-150+\ldots\end{aligned}[/tex]

Now, evaluating f′′′(x) at x=0, we get:

[tex]f^{\prime \prime \prime}(0)=-150[/tex]

So, the third derivative of f(x) at x=0 is −150.

Complete Question:

Find the third derivative of f at x = 0 if the Maclaurin series for:

[tex]f(x) = 1 - 9x + 16x^2 - 25x^3 +.....[/tex]

Variable cost describes a cost that fluctuates depending on the number of units produced. It is defined as a cost that varies in line with the output produced. It increases or decreases based on the volume of the production of the company; they increase as production rises and decreases as production fall. 

Answer: Variable Cost APEX

To translate the point P(x,y) , a units left and b units down, use P'(x−a,y−b) .

The rule for reflecting over the X axis is to negate the value of the y-coordinate of each point, but leave the x-value the same.

Given:

[tex]f(x)=x^2\\\\\text{Translating 2 units down, }\\\\g(x)=f(x)-2=x^2-2\\\\\text{On reflecting on x axis,}\\\\g(x)=x^2-2[/tex]

For more information:https://brainly.com/question/9898881

#SPJ2

I took a test?

1.5 w/out a negative.

-------------------------------

Also saw a lot of struggle to answer the other question,... so in case you need it.

From the graph in the figure attached to the question, The best estimate of the residual value when x = 1 on the graph is 1.5

A residual value is an indication of how far a regression line fails to reach a data point vertically. From the graph in the figure attached to the question;

We can see how the regression line lies at the midpoint between 3 to 4 on the vertical axis at x = 1. However, the data point is located at 5, so we have the distance of the residual value to be from the midpoint of 3 to 5 which is equal to 1.5

Learn more about residual value here:
https://brainly.com/question/26080178