Answer:
Erving Goffman was preocupied by asylum and psycho-social consequences of such a state.
A defendant was charged with battery, defined as at common law. At trial, an expert witness testified for the defense that the defendant, an athlete, was under the influence of a performance-enhancing drug at the time he committed the battery and that he would not have done so had he not been so influenced. The defendant asked for an instruction to the effect that if the jury believed that he was influenced by the drug at the time of the crime and would not have committed it otherwise, it had to acquit him.Which of the following circumstances would most aid the defendant’s argument in favor of such an instrucion?a. Evidence that the defendant is addicted to this drug and has an overwhelming urge to consume it.b. Evidence that the defendant’s coach, who gave him the drug, told him it was only an aspirin.c. Evidence that the victim of the assault taunted the defendant about his use of the drug immediately before the assault.d. Expert testimony that a reasonable person, on consuming this drug, may experience uncontrollable rages.
Based on the fact that a defendant was charged with battery, defined as at common law. At trial, an expert witness testified for the defense that the defendant, an athlete, was under the influence of a performance-enhancing drug, the circumstance that would most aid the defendant’s argument in favor of such an instrucion is (B) Evidence that the defendant's coach, who gave him the drug, told him it was only an aspirin.
What is a Criminal Defense?This refers to the term that is used to describe and define the process of representing an accused in legal matters and in court where a trained professional or lawyer tries to prove their innocence or culpability.
Hence, it can be seen that based on the given criminal charge, there is an argument of unknowing use and this can be aided by the evidence that the defendant's coach, who gave him the drug, told him it was only an aspirin.
Read more about criminal defense here:
https://brainly.com/question/25316179
#SPJ1
Evidence that the defendant was misled to believe the performance-enhancing drug was only aspirin suggests involuntary intoxication, potentially negating criminal intent and supporting a defense against battery charges.
This suggests the defendant's intoxication was involuntary, as he was not aware he was consuming a performance-enhancing substance. In contrast, voluntary intoxication is rarely a defense in battery cases, as it usually does not excuse the behavior stemming from the voluntary act of ingesting a substance. Since involuntary intoxication may negate the necessary criminal intent for battery, evidence of such intoxication could be a significant factor in the defendant's defense. This aligns with the jurisprudence that allows for involuntary intoxication as a defense if the ingestion of the substance was under false pretenses, which could apply if the defendant was deceived about the substance he was taking.
Mark drinks about a fifth of ??? bourbon each day but denies that he’s an alcoholic. When his wife suggests that he should seek treatment, he angrily replies, “I hold down a job just fine. Drinking just doesn’t affect me as much as it does other people. If I had problems at work, then maybe I’d be worried that I have a drinking problem, but I don’t.” What is Mark most likely doing to reduce his level of cognitive dissonance?
Answer:
The correct answer would be, Mark is most likely doing Self Justification to reduce his level of cognitive dissonance.
Explanation:
When a person has some thoughts, beliefs, attitudes, which are inconsistent, especially as relating to behavior decisions and attitude change, it is called as the Cognitive Dissonance.
In this example, Mark is practicing the Self Justification attitude of Cognitive Dissonance, which means he is justifying his wrong act or behavior by giving some inconsistent examples. His this attitude is a self justification attitude.
A psychologist who is studying the mathematical abilities of adults finds significant differences between the scores of adults born 50 years ago, when rote learning was stressed, and those born 25 years ago, when more “progressive” approaches to education were popular. This is an example of a(n) _____.
Answer:
The given situation is an example of cohort differences.
Explanation:
A cohort study is a form of study that samples a group of people that performs a cross section at particular intervals through time. Such a group is called cohort and it shares a defining characteristic, generally the one which experiences a common event in a particular period like graduation or birth.
Example: studying the mathematical ability of two groups of adults born 50 years ago and 25 years ago and analyzing the cohort differences in the scores of the test.
Therefore, the given situation is an example of cohort differences
Which state produces 70 to 80 percent of all olives in the u.S.?
Answer:
California
Explanation:
When was the glorious revolution and the writing of the english bill of rights
Answer: The glorious revolution takes place in November of 1688, and the writing of the English Bill of Rights in 1689.
Explanation:
The glorious revolution refers to the process of removing the throne of King James II (Catholic), with his daughter Mary II (Protestant) occupying the throne instead. The process of overthrow was very violent due mainly to the confrontation between the followers of both religions and all the kingdoms belonging to Great Britain participated; England, Scotland, and Ireland.
The English Bill of Rights took place in 1689 and is a law that establishes the basic civil rights, limits powers of the monarchy and establishes the parliamentary rights. It was established at the beginning of the reign of Maria II.
I hope this information can help you.
Johnny is 12 years old and has been aggressive toward his siblings and his peers, hitting, kicking, and calling them names. Johnny’s parents are worried about these new aggressive behaviors and consult with a psychologist, who suggests that this behavior could be a result of watching too many violent movies and playing too many violent videogames. The psychologist’s explanation for the aggression is consistent with _____.
Behaviorism
Explanation:The reason why "Behaviorism" would be the correct answer is because what the psychologist described as a possible factor for Johnny's behavior is related to Behaviorism.
Behaviorism is when experts can study a person's behavior and can see that the person's behavior is caused by its environment. What this means is that a person's behavior could be based upon their surroundings.
In this case, the reason why Johnny is acting this way is because he watched too many violent movies and played too many violent games. The violent movies and games that he saw and played would be the environment.
The environment, the violent movies and games, caused him to act the way he's acting. His behavior is being based upon the stuff he's watching, and that's the environment that's leading him to being very aggressive towards his siblings and peers. Since he's around an environment of violence, he's behavior starts to act with violence.
If it wasn't for the environment,. the violent movies and games, then he would probably be behaving different, due to the act that he's not around an environment of violence.
I hope this helped you out.Good luck on your academics.Have a fantastic day!The leaks began at about two or three. The first was in the corner of Nademah’s bedroom. Zeitoun went down to the garage and retrieved a forty-gallon garbage can to catch the water. Another leak opened a few minutes later, this one in the upstairs hallway. Zeitoun found another garbage can. A window in the master bedroom broke just after three o’clock, as if a brick had been thrown through the glass. Zeitoun gathered the shards and stuffed the opening with a pillow. Another leak opened in Safiya and Aisha’s room. He found another, bigger garbage can. What conclusion can readers draw about this character vs.nature conflict?
Answer:
D-Faced with the storm’s brutality, Zeitoun is resourceful and determined.
Explanation:
Faced with the storm’s brutality, Zeitoun is resourceful and determined.
Answer:
it's D on edg
Explanation:
While serfdom and indentured servitude were justified mostly by economic principles, slavery and the encomienda system were justified most by A. Racist principles B. Regional practices C. Religious principles D. Agriculture practices
Answer:
While serfdom and indentured servitude were justified mostly by economic principles, slavery and the encomienda system were justified most by Racist principles.- A.
Dianne feels overwhelmed. She helps her adult daughter regularly with finances and caring for her grandchildren. She is also the primary caregiver of both her aging mother and her father-in-law. She feels like she never has a minute to herself. Dianne can be referred to as being in the _____ generation.
Answer:
Sandwich generation
Explanation:
The sandwich generation are individuals that care for their (often adult) children and their aging parents.
They care for both simultaneously, which puts often an enormous amount of pressure (mental and economical) on them.
The sandwich generation represents 47% of the adult population in the USA. The trend is on the rise due to aging population and financial instability, which makes starting an independent life difficult for many adults.
Health records that aren't available between hospitals and medical offices are considered lacking
A. communication.
B. contact.
C. interoperability.
D. correspondence.
Answer:
C. interoperability.
Explanation:
Interoperability is the ability of two different computer or electronical systems to use the information of the other for its own benefit, for examples two different hospitals that have information about a patient and have the medical records, if that patient goes to other hostipal with interoperabilty thay can see his or her medical records.
A defendant is on trial for murder. The only evidence linking the defendant to the crime is some blood found at the scene. The lead detective testifies that an officer took a vial containing a blood sample that had been retrieved by a crime scene technician and drove off with it. The officer is now dead. Next, the prosecution presents as a witness a crime lab chemist. The chemist will testify that he took a vial of blood that contained a label identifying it as having been retrieved from the subject crime scene, and that he performed tests that established a match between that blood and a blood sample taken from the defendant. Is the testimony of the chemist admissible?
Question Value: 20 points Jamal is concerned about his neighbor, Paul. Paul recently killed a cat and hid the body under his house. When confronted he was not sorry and did not seem bothered by his actions. _____ personality disorder may be an appropriate diagnosis for Paul.
Answer:
Antisocial personality disorder
Explanation:
People who suffer from antisocial personality disorder often feel lack of remorse or care for their actions and how it may affect others. Seeing that Paul seemed unremorseful when confronted by Jamal about the killing of the cat, it points to him having antisocial personality disorder.
District
Look at this map of an imaginary state that has been
redistricted
District
A
District
Party 1
Based on this map, what conclusion can someone draw
about who was most likely in charge of the redistricting?
Party 2
District
Party 1
O Party 2
O neither party
the federal government
Answer:
Party 1.
Explanation:
One could make some educated guesses based on the distribution of the districts and the parties that control them.
What is redistricting?If one party controls a significantly larger number of districts than the other, it could be inferred that they had more influence in the redistricting process. Additionally, if the districts appear to be drawn in a way that benefits one party over the other, it could suggest that they had more control over the process.
However, without additional information about the political landscape and the specific redistricting process that took place, it would be premature to definitively attribute responsibility for the redistricting to a particular entity or group.
It is possible that the redistricting was done by a non-partisan commission or that a court ordered the redistricting for reasons unrelated to political power.
Learn more about redistricting here
https://brainly.com/question/23858494
#SPJ7
Which insanity standard states that if defendants know that what they were doing was wrong, but they could not help themselves, or if they were unable to control their actions, then they may not be held accountable for their offense?
Answer: It is called irresistible impulse standard.
Explanation:
In criminal law, irresistible impulse is a defense by excuse, in this case some sort of insanity, in which the individual states that they should not be held criminally responsible for their actions that broke the law, because they were not able to control those actions, even if they knew them to be wrong.
In a study about attitudes towards higher education, four subjects are asked to rank the relative importance of higher education. All four participants rank higher education as "very important" or "extremely important" on the survey. Which of the following participants is most likely to experience cognitive dissonance as a part of this response?
A. A master electrician who has significant advanced on-the-job training but no degree
B. A day laborer whose own education stopped at seventh grade and whose family includes no one who has attended any college
C. A high school math teacher who encouraged his own son to skip college and focus on learning a trade to "save all that wasted tuition money"
D. A university professor with two doctoral degrees who has actively advocated for significant reform in the country's higher education system
C. A high school math teacher who encouraged his own son to skip college and focus on learning a trade to "save all that wasted tuition money"
Explanation:The reason why answer choice "C. A high school math teacher who encouraged his own son to skip college and focus on learning a trade to 'save all that wasted tuition money'" would be the correct answer because the high school teacher would have a "cognitive dissonance" in his response.
Cognitive dissonance is is having 2 or multiple beliefs in a topic, in this case, the high school teacher would have 2 beliefs in the topic of higher education.
The high school teacher believes that higher education is very important and that people need to get a higher education, but he tells his own son that the tuition that is going into college is "wasted money." This shows that the high school teacher has cognitive dissonance because he has two different beliefs. He believes that higher education is very important, but doesn't want his own son to pursue it because of the tuition costs.
I hope this helped you out.Good luck on your academics.Have a fantastic day!Structurally, the Articles of Confederation created
a) three branches of governments
b) only one governing body
c) a federal judiciary
Answer:
Answer choice A
Explanation:
The Articles of Confederation served as the written document that established the functions of the national government of the United States after it declared independence from Great Britain.
Answer:
Structurally, the Articles of Confederation created Three branches of governments
Explanation:
The confederation article is among the first constitution in America that established the union during the war of revolutionary. The congress of the intercontinental then drafted it and passed the declaration.
The article led to cooperation among different states; the report was in favor of the power of the country because they were not confident about a central and robust government. This was because insufficient federal government with the three bodies of the ruling.
This is the reason why the confederation article served as a document that led to the declaration of power.
Congress passes legislation that requires all people to have health insurance or pay fines to the government. The president analyzes the legislation and signs it. Several different individuals challenge the law as unconstitutional, and the United States Supreme Court agrees to hear the case. After the hearing, the justices declare that the law is constitutional. This is an example of:
Answer:
The system of checks and balances.Explanation:
The system of check and balances is the system whereby all three branches of the government (the legislative, the executive and the judicial) oversees, check, limit the other so no parts abuse from their powers.
Through this system, each branch can respond to the action of the other, and one example that exemplifies it best is the process of passing laws: When Congress passes a bill, it goes to the President for signature. If the President signs it, it becomes a law, but if they veto the bill, then the bill is sent back to Congress to have a chance of overriding the Presidential veto with enough votes. Lastly, once legislation is enacted and is being enforced, the Supreme Court (who has the authority to hear special cases) has the power of Judicial Review, that is to say, the ability to review the bill and determine whether it is unconstitutional. This is exactly the process outlined in the statement provided.
What is the safest mode of transportation?
How did boris johnson become prime minister
Answer:
honestly i dont know
Explanation:
Corporations invest in other companies for all of the following reasons except toa. house excess cash until needed.b. meet strategic goals.c. generate earnings.d. increase trading of the other companies' stock.
Corporations invest in other companies to house excess cash, meet strategic goals, or generate earnings, but not specifically to d. increase trading of the other companies' stock.
Corporations invest in other companies for several strategic reasons, including to house excess cash until it is needed, to meet strategic goals, or to generate earnings. However, one reason corporations typically do not invest in other companies is to increase trading of the other companies' stock. While this could be a consequence of corporate investment, it is not a primary motivation for such an investment.
Investing in stock allows a corporation to potentially earn a higher return than might be possible with bonds. Additionally, an investment may align with corporate strategies like acquiring new product lines, entering new markets, or forming cooperative strategies for risk sharing and gaining technology access. On the contrary, increasing the trading volume of another company's stock would not be a direct objective of corporate investment, as it does not necessarily align with strategic goals or the pursuit of a higher return on investment.
Which of the following was the strongest motivation for the European powers, such as England and France, to explore and make territorial claims in the Americas? Catholic rulers feared the potential of a massive Protestant empire to crush their own empire and faith. They witnessed and felt threatened by the growing value of Spain's colonial economy and trade. It was the only way to protect their shipping and trade with the native populations in the New World. Monarchs saw the opportunity to incorporate thousands of American Indians as taxpaying citizens.
Answer:
Option B. One of the strongest motivation for the European powers, such as England and France, to explore and make territorial claims in the Americas was that they witnessed and felt threatened by the growing value of Spain's colonial economy and trade.
Explanation:
The European colonization of the Americas began in 1492 when the Italian explorer Christopher Columbus landed, by mistake, in what was going to be known as "The New World". Although Italian by birth, Columbus was sponsored to do his voyage by the Spanish crown, and after his first trip to the new continent, a series of other Spanish travelers started to colonize different regions of America. This gave Spain a huge growing value based on trade and a new way of economic ruling, and sooner than later other powers of Europe like England and France decided it was their time to conquer some of the New World, so that their own power would not be diminished by the Spanish's conquering wave. In the end, England and France were mainly settled in what is now known as North America, while Spain controlled the rest of the region.
Answer:
option B!
Explanation:
Bernie sanders with martin luther king jr
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
I need help ASAP please
a computer in every home - Bill Gates
a higher purpose through animation - Walt Disney
a motorcar for the multitude - Henry Ford
sell dreams instead of products - Steve Jobs
Hope this helps.
r3t40
What is a difference between obedience and conformity?
Answer:
To conform means to act in accordance with certain expectations or specifications in place. In contrast, to obey means to fulfill a specific command. Thus, the difference between the two is that conformity is to act as expected without any specific instruction to do so, while obey means the opposite. to obey thing that the want you to do like orders and you have to do it in force someone may force you to do something it like taking orders from someone
Explanation:
Conformity requires a request, obedience involves an order. Conformity is going along with persons of equal status; obedience is obeying someone with a higher position. While conformity is driven by the desire to fit in, obedience is driven by social influence.
What do you mean by Conformity?Conformity is the process through which individuals alter their attitudes, behaviors, beliefs, or perceptions to more closely align with those of the organizations they identify with, aspire to join, or for whose approval they are looking.
Conformity is peer pressure; the person submits to it without being asked to do so because they want to fit in and be accepted. On the other hand, those in positions of authority, such teachers and police officers, command obedience.
Therefore, Conformity requires a request, obedience involves an order. Conformity is going along with persons of equal status; obedience is obeying someone with a higher position.
Learn more about Conformity, here;
https://brainly.com/question/15730332
#SPJ2
Reaction formation refers to the process by which people:
a.disguise unaccapetable unconscious impulses by attributing them to others
b. consciously express feelings that are the opposite of unaccapetable unconsious impulses
c. retreat to behavior patterns characteristic of an earlier stage of development
d. offer self-justifying explanations in place of the but unaccaptable unconsious reasons for action
Answer: b. consciously express feelings that are the opposite of unacceptable unconscious impulses
Explanation:
Reaction formation is known to be an act of behaving in a way and manner which is completely different from how someone wanted to act or behave. Thus, it is a form of defense mechanism which makes an individual to feel that their feelings or actions are unacceptable in the society and as a result, express their feelings or actions in opposite way which is acceptable.
Reaction formation is a defense mechanism where people manage anxiety by expressing the opposite feelings or behaviors of their unaccepted or anxiety-inducing impulses.
Explanation:Reaction formation is a psychological term that falls under the classification of defense mechanisms. Defense mechanisms are unconscious strategies that people use to manage anxiety or distress in themselves. Specifically, reaction formation is the process by which individuals avoid confronting unaccepted or anxiety-inducing impulses by expressing feelings or behaviors that are directly opposite. Therefore, in the context of your question, the correct answer would be option b: Reaction formation refers to the process by which people consciously express feelings that are the opposite of unacceptable unconscious impulses.
Learn more about Reaction formation here:https://brainly.com/question/31846451
#SPJ6
As a well-educated and highly esteemed businesswoman, Delores feels she has accomplished a great deal in her life. She decides that she would like to give back to the community, so she makes a sizable endowment to the local conservatory. She is also using her professional influence to draw the public’s attention to the needs of children who have cancer. Abraham Maslow would probably say that Delores has reached the ________ stage of his need hierarchy.
A, esteem
B, cognitive
C, aesthetic
D, self-actualization
How does the organization of the Senate allow a small minority of the population to have significant power in the legislative process?
Answer:
Explanation:
One of these beautiful things about the United States legislature is how much force that minority party has to prevent or boring government. It would be the shame to miss this and to move the assembly into another edition of the House of Representatives with the only difference being the members-only have more massive egos. And all filibustering chairman Trump's appointment of Justice Gorsuch, with no strategy, endgame, or knowing, ensures is this is just what would happen. As the conservative who saw himself at the minority in recent years fighting back against President Obama, I realize the allure of engaging in fights yet possibly useless things all too well. We do get grounds to appease, after all. Still, I believe you can rue that time you pushed Mitch McConnell's finger to push the nuclear switch at the shortsighted revenge turn at Merrick garland's failed appointment.
Elijah is a 3-year boy who likes to spread his peas and carrots all over his plate. After spreading out his food, he asks for more. His mom pushes all the food together and Elijah continues to eat. Which period of cognitive development is Elijah in?
(A) Formal operations
(B) Preoperational
(C) Accomodation
(D) Sensorimotor
(E) Egocentrism
Answer:
(B) Preoperational
Explanation:
The theory developed by the famous psychologist Jean Piaget, about the preoperational stage, describes the characteristics of reasoning during a person's age. More specifically, it is the phase of cognitive development that the child goes through between 2 and 7 years.
Which president never lived in the white house
Answer: President Washington
Explanation: Because the White House was still in the making at his time .
Please Help Me TY!!!!
Match each example with the choice that best fits the description.
Examples
(1) The connotative definition of the word snake
(2) The denotative definition of the word snake
(3) A sentence featuring the literal meaning of the word snake
(4) A sentence featuring a simile with the word snake
choices that best fits the description:
A) Anita told everyone she would like a snake for her birthday.
B) one who is untrustworthy or presents an unseen danger
C) The kite string was wrapped around the branch like a snake.
D) Todd was a snake in the grass, waiting for a chance to strike.
E) a scaly, limbless, elongated, sometimes venomous reptile
1: B
2: E
3: A
4: C
I'm pretty sure these are right, yell at me if i'm wrong lol