Fidel castro led a revolution in cuba in 1959 and created a government based on

Answer

The learning pattern which is described in the behavior of Sarah known as  Confluence pattern of learning. It applies to the pattern which outlines the process in which we utilize our intelligence, take initiative, opportunities and brainstorming techniques of advancing things in a unique manner.

Explanation

Learning patterns are a easy approach to document an essential lesson. They demonstrate how to generate a strong approach for administering or assessing an action, such as operating an edit-a-thon, or the way to conduct survey. A learning pattern is imagined as a consistent combination of learning actions that individuals ordinarily employ their beliefs about knowledge and their learning motivation, as a complex that is representative of them for a specific duration. Confluence learning pattern enables the scholar to combine diverse pieces of knowledge into the “big picture.”

Further explanation

Learning is a demonstration of various elements of individual anatomy and human nature. Data obtained through the five sensations which are known as vision, sound, flavor, touching, and smell is electronically concocted, classified, and deposited in the mind. In any furnished moment, those five senses are presenting the brain with millions of unique bits of knowledge that can produce both intentional and oblivious responses.

The key to deliberate knowledge is a memory. Memory is a substantial phenomenon that is influenced by physiological factors such as anxiety and working of chemical receptors. In simplistic terms, we can contemplate the mind as the hard-drive of human existence. The Interactive Learning Model accommodates both a structure for learning explicit barriers to individual learning and a logical explanation for why this program has significance.

The Interactive Learning Model symbolizes that at the point when data is processed utilizing varying levels it develops the four interactive forms of growth and learning: sequence, accuracy, scientific reasoning, and confluence. These four noticeable patterns substantiate themselves not only in our thinking but our feelings and conation actions as well.

The individual who applies the Confluent pattern on a First basis conduces to circumvent traditional procedures, explores alternative methods to accomplish responsibilities, usually starts before learning all the directions, and extemporizes.  

Keywords  

Confluence pattern ,  brainstorm techniques,  circumvent traditional procedures

Learn More

  Confluence learning https://brainly.com/question/1362549  

The learning pattern displayed by Sarah in the above example is confluence learning.

Further explanation:

Confluence learning patterns is a type of learning pattern of four types of learning patterns i.e,  

Sequential learning pattern is characterized by following a step by step process to obtain an outcome and having defined directions or instructions

Precision learning pattern is characterized by gaining accurate information by questioning in order to avoid mistakes and playing it safe

Technical learning pattern is characterized by individual and independent reasoning and real world problem solving that is aimed at finding appropriate solutions for a problem.

Confluent learning is characterized by risk taking, a need to include a personal touch and relying on creativity. A person with confluent learning pattern tries to avoid using conventional methods or ways to do things. He or she always seeks out alternative ways to do things and learn them.

Sarah, here demonstrates confluential learning pattern by being ready to make mistakes, trying different methods and thinking creatively to obtain results.

Learn more:

Answer Details:

Grade: College Psychology

Subject: Psychology

Chapter: Learning patterns

Keywords: learning, learning pattern, confluent learning, out-of-the box thinking, risk taking, creativity, values, precision, reasoning, word problem.

Answer: the correct answer is D. the son's children, because their interest will vest, if at all, within a life in being + 21 years.

Explanation:

In the USA, up until the age of majority you are considered a minor. Generally speaking, the age of majority is considered sometime between age 18 and 21 in the USA.

In this case, the simple owner will is clear about the reach of the legal instrument.

In the given legal scenario, the testator's friend initially receives the property in fee simple. The son's children, because their interest will vest, if at all, within a life in being + 21 years. The option (D) is correct.

According to the provided scenario, the title to the property (in this case, a restaurant) would pass in fee simple to the friend, with a subsequent condition that if the testator's son has children and they are alive when the friend dies, the property would then go to the son's living children.

This can be construed as a remainder interest which is contingent upon the friend's death during the lifetime of the testator's son's children. Since this contingency could potentially be satisfied within 21 years after the death of a life in being at the time the interest was created (in this scenario, the friend), it does not violate the Rule Against Perpetuities.

Answer:

The correct answer would be option B, Coalition Formation.

Explanation:

Coalition formation is simply the actions exerted by the group of people which put influence or pressure over someone or some decision.

So in this example, Krystal proposed a budgeting process to her boss which he rejected, but Krystal thinks that her proposal was simpler and fairer, so she presented the proposal to the heads of other departments who could get benefit from her new budgeting process proposal. They liked her proposal very much. Also some co workers liked her simple and fair budgeting process proposal. So here a group of people arose which was in favor of the new proposed process. When her boss came to know about it, he agreed to test her proposal in a pilot project. So this act of likeness by the key personnel of the company influence the behavior of the boss. Key personnel here act as the coalition. So Krystal used the Coalition formation of influence here.

Krystal used coalition formation to influence her boss by gaining support from other department heads and colleagues, persuading her boss to reconsider her proposal. So, option B is correct.

In the scenario described, Krystal is using coalition formation as her main form of influence. This tactic involves building a support base and using the collective power of the group to persuade someone to think, feel, or do something. Krystal did this by getting the support of other department heads and her colleagues before approaching her boss again, which eventually led to the acceptance of her proposal.

Answer:

You consider whether the behavior is atypical, dysfunctional, distressful, and/or deviant in order to assess whether it truly is a psychological disorder, such as obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Explanation:

Psychological disorders refer to a combination of beliefs, thought patterns and behaviors that are clinically significant, and recurrently affect a person's social, emotional and occupational functioning. In this instance, if your brother's obsession with neatness is a problem and you are considering whether the behavior is atypical, dysfunctional, distressful, and/or deviant, you are likely checking if he has obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a type of anxiety disorder when a person has chronically intrusive and uncontrollable thoughts (obsessions), that lead to compulsive behaviors such as obsession with neatness, cleaning one's room, etc.

Thus, if you are trying to decide if your brother's obsession with neatness is a problem, you are assessing whether it truly is a psychological disorder, such as obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Corporations invest in other companies to house excess cash, meet strategic goals, or generate earnings, but not specifically to d. increase trading of the other companies' stock.

Corporations invest in other companies for several strategic reasons, including to house excess cash until it is needed, to meet strategic goals, or to generate earnings. However, one reason corporations typically do not invest in other companies is to increase trading of the other companies' stock. While this could be a consequence of corporate investment, it is not a primary motivation for such an investment.

Investing in stock allows a corporation to potentially earn a higher return than might be possible with bonds. Additionally, an investment may align with corporate strategies like acquiring new product lines, entering new markets, or forming cooperative strategies for risk sharing and gaining technology access. On the contrary, increasing the trading volume of another company's stock would not be a direct objective of corporate investment, as it does not necessarily align with strategic goals or the pursuit of a higher return on investment.

Answer:

true

Explanation:

The statement 'Expression must have integral or unscoped enum type' is TRUE. Programming languages like C++ require many expressions to be of integral or unscoped enum types due to memory management and operation execution reasons.

Behaviorism

The reason why "Behaviorism" would be the correct answer is because what the psychologist described as a possible factor for Johnny's behavior is related to Behaviorism.

Behaviorism is when experts can study a person's behavior and can see that the person's behavior is caused by its environment. What this means is that a person's behavior could be based upon their surroundings.

In this case, the reason why Johnny is acting this way is because he watched too many violent movies and played too many violent games. The violent movies and games that he saw and played would be the environment.

The environment, the violent movies and games, caused him to act the way he's acting. His behavior is being based upon the stuff he's watching, and that's the environment that's leading him to being very aggressive towards his siblings and peers. Since he's around an environment of violence, he's behavior starts to act with violence.

If it wasn't for the environment,. the violent movies and games, then he would probably be behaving different, due to the act that he's not around an environment of violence.

Answer:

Content Validity

Explanation:

Content validity, which can also be referred to as "logical validity" refers to concept found in In psychometrics regarding the extent to which a measure represents all facets of a given construct. In this case, Josiane doesn't feel like the test represents someone's intelligence since it doesn't seem to test more than your vocabulary knowledge and intelligence is much more than vocabulary.

Josiane is questioning the construct validity of the online IQ test, which is the extent to which the test measures intelligence, as it only focuses on verbal competencies and not other aspects such as problem-solving or visual-spatial abilities.

Josiane is questioning the construct validity of the online IQ test she found. Construct validity pertains to whether a test measures the concept it claims to measure, in this case, intelligence. Concerns about IQ tests often revolve around whether they encompass all components of intelligence, including problem-solving, verbal, quantitative, and visual-spatial abilities. Since the test Josiane found only measures verbal competencies through the definitions of words, it may not fully capture other important aspects such as problem-solving or visual-spatial abilities, thus affecting its construct validity.

Furthermore, the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) is an example of an intelligence test that attempts to provide a more holistic measure by assessing a range of abilities, recognizing that intelligence comprises a pool of specific abilities. This multifaceted approach to intelligence testing highlights the complexity of delivering a single measure of an individual's intelligence and the importance of construct validity.

Answer:

This is an example of a case that involves the c. establishment clause of the Constitution's First Amendment.

Explanation:

The establishment clause refers to the First Amendment's clause that states the following: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion. This clause prohibits the U.S. government from establishing an official religion, from giving preference to one religion or promoting one religion over others and from forcing citizens to believe in a religion.

In the example of the case, this clause in involved because schools or public institutions should not be allowed to promote one religion over others, and to give a religious prayer at a school's graduation would be a form of giving preference to one religion over others.

The scenario presented pertains to the establishment clause of the First Amendment, as it involves potential government endorsement of religion.

The situation described involves a conflict between individuals' religious rights and the public, non-religious nature of a school event. The constitutional clause in question here is the establishment clause of the First Amendment. This clause prohibits the government (or a public school, in this case) from declaring and financially supporting a religion, thus preventing any government endorsement of religion. By having a student read The Lord's Prayer, the school could be perceived to be endorsing a specific religious practice. Sid's family may contend that this violates the establishment clause, hence their legal action.

https://brainly.com/question/29618695

#SPJ12

Answer: I will expect to win $1.1156 for the bet.

Explanation:

probability 2 cards are clubs (13/52)*(12/51) = (0.25) * (0.2352)= 0.05882

other 1-0.05882= 0.94118

Expected value= $531 * 0.05882 - $32 (0.94118) =  31.2334- 30.1178

Expected value = $ 1,1156. Making this bet 100 times you will make $111.56

1: B

2: E

3: A

4: C

I'm pretty sure these are right, yell at me if i'm wrong lol

If The States Population Has Increased.

Answer:

California

Explanation:

Answer:

Just-world hypothesis

Explanation:

Just-world hypothesis is an assumption that belie that everything that happen in people's live is a direct consequences of their own action (If that people is doing good, those people will somehow be rewarded. If that people is doing bad, those people will somehow punished). This assumption is what probably influence the people to donate to the homeless man.

Answer:

The answer is C.

Answer: Short-term memory

Explanation:

Short-term memory is referred to as a type of memory which keeps brief or short information temporarily. Information which an individual is presently thinking of can be remembered for a short period of time and it is always limited. Furthermore, information kept in short term memory can also be recalled through subvocal repetition. It is also called active memory. Thus, its time span is in seconds.

Tammy relied on short term memory.

Answer: the correct answer is C. No, because the jury could find that the company should have foreseen that children would sneak into the park.

Explanation:

In this case, the company has the obligation to forsee possible threats and has no excuse for not having taken action in doing that.

Answer:

Past conditioning

Explanation:

Answer:

past conditioning

Explanation:

PLEASE GIVE BRAINLIEST

Based on the fact that a defendant was charged with battery, defined as at common law. At trial, an expert witness testified for the defense that the defendant, an athlete, was under the influence of a performance-enhancing drug, the circumstance that would most aid the defendant’s argument in favor of such an instrucion is (B) Evidence that the defendant's coach, who gave him the drug, told him it was only an aspirin.

This refers to the term that is used to describe and define the process of representing an accused in legal matters and in court where a trained professional or lawyer tries to prove their innocence or culpability.

Hence, it can be seen that based on the given criminal charge, there is an argument of unknowing use and this can be aided by the evidence that the defendant's coach, who gave him the drug, told him it was only an aspirin.

Read more about criminal defense here:

https://brainly.com/question/25316179

#SPJ1

Evidence that the defendant was misled to believe the performance-enhancing drug was only aspirin suggests involuntary intoxication, potentially negating criminal intent and supporting a defense against battery charges.

This suggests the defendant's intoxication was involuntary, as he was not aware he was consuming a performance-enhancing substance. In contrast, voluntary intoxication is rarely a defense in battery cases, as it usually does not excuse the behavior stemming from the voluntary act of ingesting a substance. Since involuntary intoxication may negate the necessary criminal intent for battery, evidence of such intoxication could be a significant factor in the defendant's defense. This aligns with the jurisprudence that allows for involuntary intoxication as a defense if the ingestion of the substance was under false pretenses, which could apply if the defendant was deceived about the substance he was taking.

Answer:

The right answer is option B “We act selfishly or in our own self-interest”

Explanation:

Psychological egoism is a theory that explains motivation with the focus of why or for what we do the actions. It says we always act selfishly. The problem in here is define if we actually act selfishly, or we just act in our own self-interest. The first one is based on that we only do things that are in our sincere self-interest, because people are unconsciously selfish and naturally we always tend to do things that benefits us. The second one is based on our intentions, instead of asking why we do it, we should as to whom, in fact the answer will be always ourselves, acting selfishly.  

Answer:

The correct answer is Option B

Explanation:

The theory of psychological egoism suggests that all our actions are results of our own interest.  

However the haziness prevails between two behavioral aspects. They are the activities which we perform is mainly of being selfish or to satisfy our own self-interest.

Sometimes we may get positive output for our actions. Does it mean that we have performed the action in order to get a positive outcome? Hence motives and consequences differ even though we perform an action out of self-interest. So, Psychological egoism is known to be partially true.

Answer: the correct answer is D. constructive fraud

Explanation:

Constructive fraud is a legal term describing a situation where a person or entity gained an unfair position over another by deceitful or unfair methods.  

Answering the question, the core capabilities for response are Fire Management and suppression; fatality management services; and environmental response/health and safety.  This implies the correct answer is B

Fire management and suppression ensure structural and viable firefighting capabilities to control any types of fire accidents and also to ensure that the lives and properties of the public including the environment are well protected.  

The mission area of fire management and suppression is response and they are meant to deal with fires of all types and complexities and also to provide adequate protection for the people in the community where the incident occurred.

The fatality management services are meant to provide help in the area of identifying victims and also to work with government such as state, local and federal to provide mortuary processes and are also meant to share information about any victim with the mass care services.

Sharing victim information with the mass care services is very vital as it will help to unify the family of the victims. Part of their core responsibilities is also to provide adequate counseling to the family of the victims.  The mission area of the fatality management services is response

The core responsibilities of the Environmental response/health and safety are to conduct proper measure and ensure the lives and safety of other people in the affected communities is well protected.

The mission area of the Environmental response/health and safety is also Response

LEARN MORE:

KEYWORDS:

Among the options provided, fire management and suppression; fatality management services; and environmental response/health and safety are recognized as core response capabilities according to FEMA guidelines. These ensure effective protection and response to emergencies.

The core capabilities for response usually refer to the abilities that organizations or systems have to effectively respond to emergencies, disasters, or crisis conditions. Among the options given, option B: 'Fire management and suppression; fatality management services; and environmental response/health and safety' are recognized as core response capabilities. These are elements within the National Preparedness Goal's Core Capabilities for Response as outlined by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). These capacities ensure that a community or system can adequately protect itself and respond effectively to reduce the loss of life and quickly stabilize the incident.

https://brainly.com/question/30165933

#SPJ6

Answer:

Sandwich generation

Explanation:

The sandwich generation are individuals that care for their (often adult) children and their aging parents.

They care for both simultaneously, which puts often an enormous amount of pressure (mental and economical) on them.  

The sandwich generation represents 47% of the adult population in the USA. The trend is on the rise due to aging population and financial instability, which makes starting an independent life difficult for many adults.

Answer:

The correct answer would be option A, Casual Fallacy.

Explanation:

In simple words, Fallacy is a mistaken belief. When someone makes a belief about something over an unsound argument, this is called Fallacy.

Casual Fallacy is the type of fallacy in which it is believed that there is a simple cause of an outcome, whereas in reality, the outcome could have caused by number of other factors.

Like in this example, Mr. Simmons tells audience in the neighborhood speech that if they see a person in their town whom they don't recognize, then at once call 911 and report that person. This is the casual fallacy in which the seeing of an unknown person is considered a person who can commit a crime. Whereas there could be a lot other reasons for which that person visited that area.

Answer:    A) People face tradeoffs

Explanation:  Since Sophia can get tickets for a movie that is at the same time as the pool is open, she faces objective circumstances, which is why she will have to choose one of two options. This means that she will have to compromise between two equally desired activities that are incompatible, since she can not affect the objective circumstances, due to which she has to choose one of two activities.This compromise is tradeoffs.

In other words, tradeoffs can be described as a giving up of one thing or activity in exchange for the other one we want equally as the first.

Answer:  

Professor Shapiro is supporting the Activity Theory

Explanation:

The Activity theory was developed by Robert Havingrust in 1961. It was also known as the Normal Theory of Ageing. It was developed in response to the disengagement theory. It emphasizes on the direct relation between life and Activity in old age.

Further Explanation:

Activity theory state that as people age, they should maintain social interactions and stay active to delay the aging process and to enhance the quality of life. It challenged the disengagement theory developed by Commings and Henry in 1961. The disengagement theory claimed that it was normal for older people to withdraw from society. It is a part of the aging process.

On the other hand, Havinghurst argued that there is a positive relationship between activity and life satisfaction. He called it " Busy Ethic". The level of social activity directly affected his positive views about himself.

This theory provides the key to age well. The key is to be an active member, meet people, go to long walks and behave as if we are still not old, Having an active lifestyle keeps the loneliness and sense of aloofness away. The more one does the better they age.

The critics of this theory consider the financial issues and unwillingness to socialize are a big hindrance for people to engage in various activities and the activity theory doesn't consider these. The critics say that old people cannot just keep repeating the same activity day in and day out.

Learn more:

disengagement theory:  https://brainly.com/question/7597403  

Keywords:

Older people withdraw, Activities, Older People

The belief of professor Shapiro that older people would live a gratifying life if they were to engage in more social activities is supported by activity theory.

Further explanation:

Activity theory is a theory of aging applicable especially to late adulthood which suggests that people who engage in activities and social interactions age gracefully compared to those who don’t. This theory suggests that there is a strong correlation between activity and quality of life and life satisfaction in late-adulthood.

The activity is a directly opposing theory to ‘disengagement theory’. Disengagement theory is an older theory which suggests that disengagement from activities is inevitable as one reaches old age. Disengagement theory proposes that disengagement is functional to successfully adapt to old age.

Another theory that was added on later was ‘continuity theory’, which proposes that people were active before remain active while those who were sedentary remain sedentary.

Professor Shapiro’s belief that ‘if old age adults engaged in activities with others, then their life would be more gratifying' supports activity theory of aging.

Learn more:

Answer Details:

Grade: College Psychology

Subject: Psychology

Chapter: Life span development

Keywords:

Life span development, development psychology, activity theory, old-age, late adulthood, inactivity, activity, aging , adults, interaction.

Answer: The glorious revolution takes place in November of 1688, and the writing of the English Bill of Rights in 1689.

Explanation:

The glorious revolution refers to the process of removing the throne of King James II (Catholic), with his daughter Mary II (Protestant) occupying the throne instead. The process of overthrow was very violent due mainly to the confrontation between the followers of both religions and all the kingdoms belonging to Great Britain participated; England, Scotland, and Ireland.

The English Bill of Rights took place in 1689 and is a law that establishes the basic civil rights, limits powers of the monarchy and establishes the parliamentary rights. It was established at the beginning of the reign of Maria II.

I hope this information can help you.

If a witness who lived in the defendant’s last apartment building to testify that she also received a number of identical threatening phone calls while the defendant lived in her building, would be relevent in the case. On the condition that the court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that the caller was the defendant.

The correct answer is A. Interpersonal

Explanation:

According to Howard Gardner who was an important development psychologist, human intelligence does not focus into one ability or aspect but instead has different modalities or types. This includes the naturalist or naturalistic intelligence that focuses on the ability of understanding one's surroundings and elements from nature; the linguistic that focuses on communication and includes the ability to use texts, speeches, etc.; the intrapersonal that focus on understating the self or who we are and the interpersonal that different from the intrapersonal focuses on understanding others' feelings, emotions, moods and being empathetic. This implies, Jake mostly exemplifies the Interpersonal intelligence because he has a natural ability to identify and understand others' experiences, feelings, etc. and also he can be on the position of others and be empathetic.

Jake exemplifies interpersonal intelligence, which is the ability to understand the feelings, motivations, and needs of others, according to Howard Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences.

Based on the description, Jake exemplifies A. interpersonal intelligence. Interpersonal intelligence refers to one's ability to understand and recognize the feelings, motivations, and needs of others, which includes empathy, the ability to recognize the mood, temperament, motivations, and intentions of others. Jake's ability to understand his friends' feelings, identify with their point of view, and maintain great relationships with his classmates and professors indicates strong interpersonal intelligence.

Interpersonal Intelligence is part of Howard Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences. It covers the sensitivity to others, including skills in social situations, cooperation with team activities, and empathy, which is the capacity to understand other people's feelings and perspectives.

https://brainly.com/question/31388708

#SPJ6