Answer:
The area is [tex]\frac{567}{8}u^2[/tex]
Step-by-step explanation:
The area of a flat region bounded by the graphs of two functions f (x) and g (x), with f (x)> g (x) can be found through the integral:
[tex]\int\limits^b_a {[f(x) - g(x)]} \, dx[/tex]
The integration limits are given by the intersection points of the graphs of the functions in the first quadrant. Then, the cut points are:
[tex]g(x) = x\\f(x) = 2x\sqrt{25-x^2}[/tex]
[tex]x=2x\sqrt{25-x^2}\\x^2=4x^2(25-x^2)\\x^2(1-100+4x^2)=0\\x_1=0\\x_2=\frac{3\sqrt{11}}{2}[/tex]
The area of the region is:
[tex]\int\limits^b_a {[f(x) - g(x)]} \, dx = \int\limits^{\frac{3\sqrt{11}}{2}}_0 {x(2\sqrt{25-x^2}-1)} \, dx = \frac{567}{8}u^2[/tex]
If a well was 70-feet deep, the frog climbs 7 feet per hour, and it slips back 2 feet while resting? How long (in hours) will it take for the frog to get out of the well?
Answer:
It took 14 hours to get out of the well.
Step-by-step explanation:
Consider the provided information.
The well was 70-feet deep, the frog climbs 7 feet per hour, and it slips back 2 feet while resting.
In first hr frog climbs 7 feet and slips back 2 feet, that means it climbs 5 feet in an hour.
In 2 hour it climbs 2 × 5 = 10 feet, in 3 hours it climbs 3 × 5 = 15 feet and so on.
Now we need to find the time taken by the frog to get out of the well.
By observing the above pattern we can say that after 13 hours it can climb 65 feet.
13 × 5 = 65 feet
In next hour frog will climb 65 feet + 7 feet = 72 feet.
That means after 14 hours frog can get out of the well.
Hence it took 14 hours to get out of the well.
Solve the following system of equations. Write each of your answers as a fraction reduced to lowest terms. In other words, write the numbers in the exact form that the row operation tool gives them to you when you use the tool in fraction mode. No decimal answers are permitted.
15x + 15y + 10z = 106
5x + 15y + 25z = 135
15x + 10y - 5z = 42
x = _____
y = _____
z = _____
Answer:
[tex]x\ =\ \dfrac{209}{30}[/tex]
[tex]y\ =\ \dfrac{29}{18}[/tex]
[tex]z\ =\ \dfrac{64}{15}[/tex]
Step-by-step explanation:
Given equations are
15x + 15y + 10z = 106
5x + 15y + 25z = 135
15x + 10y - 5z = 42
The augmented matrix by using above equations can be written as
[tex]\left[\begin{array}{ccc}15&15&10\ \ |106\\5&15&25\ \ |135\\15&10&-5|42\end{array}\right][/tex]
[tex]R_1\ \rightarrow\ \dfrac{R_1}{15}[/tex]
[tex]=\ \left[\begin{array}{ccc}1&1&\dfrac{10}{15}|\dfrac{106}{15}\\5&15&25|135\\15&15&-5|42\end{array}\right][/tex]
[tex]R_1\rightarrowR_2-5R1\ and\ R_3\rightarrow\ R_3-15R_1[/tex]
[tex]=\ \left[\begin{array}{ccc}1&1&\dfrac{10}{15}|\dfrac{106}{15}\\\\0&10&\dfrac{65}{3}|\dfrac{299}{3}\\\\0&0&-15|-64\end{array}\right][/tex]
[tex]R_2\rightarrow\ \dfrac{R_2}{10}[/tex]
[tex]=\ \left[\begin{array}{ccc}1&1&\dfrac{10}{15}|\dfrac{106}{15}\\\\0&1&\dfrac{65}{30}|\dfrac{299}{30}\\\\0&0&-15|-64\end{array}\right][/tex]
[tex]R_3\rightarrow\ \dfrac{R_3}{-15}[/tex]
[tex]=\ \left[\begin{array}{ccc}1&1&\dfrac{10}{15}|\dfrac{106}{15}\\\\0&1&\dfrac{65}{30}|\dfrac{299}{30}\\\\0&0&1|\dfrac{64}{15}\end{array}\right][/tex]
[tex]R_1\rightarrow\ R_1-R_2[/tex]
[tex]=\ \left[\begin{array}{ccc}1&0&\dfrac{-3}{2}|\dfrac{17}{30}\\\\0&1&\dfrac{65}{30}|\dfrac{299}{30}\\\\0&0&1|\dfrac{64}{15}\end{array}\right][/tex]
[tex]R_1\rightarrow\ R_1+\dfrac{3}{2}R_3[/tex]
[tex]=\ \left[\begin{array}{ccc}1&0&0|\dfrac{209}{30}\\\\0&1&\dfrac{65}{30}|\dfrac{299}{30}\\\\0&0&1|\dfrac{64}{15}\end{array}\right][/tex]
[tex]R_2\rightarrow\ R_2-\dfrac{65}{30}R_3[/tex]
[tex]=\ \left[\begin{array}{ccc}1&0&\0|\dfrac{209}{30}\\\\0&1&0|\dfrac{29}{18}\\\\0&0&1|\dfrac{64}{15}\end{array}\right][/tex]
Hence, we can write from augmented matrix,
[tex]x\ =\ \dfrac{209}{30}[/tex]
[tex]y\ =\ \dfrac{29}{18}[/tex]
[tex]z\ =\ \dfrac{64}{15}[/tex]
Use De Moivre's Formula to derive the identity sin(40) = 4 cos (0) sin(e) - 4 cos(e) sin (0) as well as a similar "quadruple angle" formula for cos(40). S eeeotoble to leave answer in polar or
By DeMoivre's theorem,
[tex]\cos(4\theta)+i\sin(4\theta)=(\cos\theta+i\sin\theta)^4[/tex]
Expanding the right side gives
[tex]\cos^4\theta+4i\cos^3\theta\sin\theta-6\cos^2\theta\sin^2\theta-4i\cos\theta\sin^3\theta+\sin^4\theta[/tex]
Equating imaginary parts tells us
[tex]\sin(4\theta)=4\cos^3\theta\sin\theta-4\cos\theta\sin^3\theta[/tex]
(Not sure what you mean by sin(e) and cos(e)...)
Use DeMorgan's laws to write a negation for the statement "the Hulk is green or the Iron Man is red"
Answer:
"The Hulk is not green AND the Iron Man is not red"
Step-by-step explanation:
DeMorgan's laws state that the negation of an statement whose structure is "p OR q" is "not p AND not q", and similarly, that the negation of an statement whose structure is "p AND q" is "not p OR not q". The statement we want to negate in our case is "The Hulk is green OR the Iron Man is red". This is an statement whose structure is of the type "p OR q", where p would be "The Hulk is green", and q would be "the Iron Man is red". So according to DeMorgan's laws, its negation should be the statement "not p AND not q". To put them in common english, not p would be "The Hulk is NOT green", and not q would be "The Iron Man is NOT red". So the statement "not p AND not q" is simply "The Hulk is not green AND the Iron Man is not red".
To negate the statement 'the Hulk is green or Iron Man is red' using DeMorgan's Laws, you rephrase it as 'the Hulk is not green and Iron Man is not red'. The formal representation switches the disjunction to a conjunction and applies negation to each individual proposition.
To write the negation of the statement 'the Hulk is green or Iron Man is red' using DeMorgan's Laws, we first need to understand what these laws state. DeMorgan's Laws tell us how to move a negation across a conjunction (and) or a disjunction (or). According to DeMorgan's Laws, the negation of a conjunction is the disjunction of the negations, and the negation of a disjunction is the conjunction of the negations.
In formal logic, the original statement can be represented as (G \/ R), where G represents 'the Hulk is green' and R represents 'Iron Man is red'. Applying DeMorgan's Law to negate this statement would involve negating the entire proposition and then switching the 'or' to 'and'. Thus, the negation of the statement would be \u00AC(G \/ R) which translates to \u00ACG \u2227 \u00ACR using DeMorgan's Laws. This means 'the Hulk is not green and Iron Man is not red'.
Using DeMorgan's Laws is a way to express logical equivalence between propositions. By utilizing these transformation rules, one can simplify complex logical expressions or restate them in a different form without changing their meaning, making them powerful tools in formal logic and mathematics.
You paid $44 to a loan company for the use of $1,153 for 119 days, what annual rate of interest did they charge? (Assume a 360-day year.) If The annual rate of interest is 11.186 %. (Round to three decimal places.)
Answer:
11.70%
Step-by-step explanation:
Given;
Interest paid = $44
Principle amount = $1,153
Time = 119 days = [tex]\frac{\textup{119}}{\textup{365}}\textup{days}[/tex] = 0.326 years
Now,
the interest is calculated as:
interest = Principle × Rate of interest × Time
thus,
$44 = $1,153 × Rate of interest × 0.326
or
Rate of interest = 0.1170
or
in percentage = Rate × 100 = 0.1170 × 100 = 11.70%
Consider a business model in which two products, X and Y are produced. There are 160 pounds of material and 120 hours of labor available. It requires 4 pounds of material and 2 hours of labor to produce one unit of X. It requires 4 pounds of material and 6 units of labor to produce one unit of Y.
The profit for X is $35 and the profit for Y is $55. The business needs to know how many units of each product to produce to maximize resources and maximize profits. Express your answer in (x = , y = )
Maximize Z = 35x + 55y
subject to:
4x + 4y = 160
2x + 6y = 120
Answer:
The maximum profit is $1600 at x=30 and y=10.
Step-by-step explanation:
Let x be the number of units of product X.
y be the number of units of product Y.
The profit for X is $35 and the profit for Y is $55.
Maximize [tex]Z = 35x + 55y[/tex] ..... (1)
It requires 4 pounds of material and 2 hours of labor to produce one unit of X. It requires 4 pounds of material and 6 units of labor to produce one unit of Y.
Total material = 4x+4y
Total labor = 2x+6y
There are 160 pounds of material and 120 hours of labor available.
[tex]4x+4y\leq 160[/tex] .... (2)
[tex]2x+6y\leq 120[/tex] ..... (3)
[tex]x\geq 0,y\geq 0[/tex]
The related line of inequality (2) and (3) are solid line because the sign of equality "≤" contains all the point on line in the solution set.
Check the inequalities by (0,0).
[tex]4(0)+4(0)\leq 160[/tex]
[tex]0\leq 160[/tex]
This statement is true.
[tex]2x+6y\leq 120[/tex]
[tex]2(0)+6(0)\leq 120[/tex]
[tex]0\leq 120[/tex]
It means shaded region of both inequalities contain (0,0).
The extreme points of common shaded region are (0,0), (0,20), (40,0) and (30,10).
At (0,0),
[tex]Z = 35(0) + 55(0)=0[/tex]
At (0,20),
[tex]Z = 35(0) + 55(20)=110[/tex]
At (40,0),
[tex]Z = 35(40) + 55(0)=140[/tex]
At (30,10),
[tex]Z = 35(30) + 55(10)=1600[/tex]
Therefore the maximum profit is $1600 at x=30 and y=10.
Find ℒ{f(t)} by first using a trigonometric identity. (Write your answer as a function of s.)
f(t) = 16cos(t−π/6)
ℒ{f(t)} = ?
Answer:
[tex]L\{f(t)\}=\frac{8(\sqrt3s+1)}{s^2+1}[/tex]
Step-by-step explanation:
Given : [tex]f(t)=16\cos (t-\frac{\pi}{6})[/tex]
To find : ℒ{f(t)} by first using a trigonometric identity ?
Solution :
First we solve the function,
[tex]f(t)=16\cos (t-\frac{\pi}{6})[/tex]
Applying trigonometric identity, [tex]\cos (A-B)=\cos A\cos B+\sin A\sin B[/tex]
[tex]f(t)=16(\cos t\cos (\frac{\pi}{6})+\sin t\sin(\frac{\pi}{6})[/tex]
[tex]f(t)=16(\frac{\sqrt3}{2}\cos t+\frac{1}{2}\sin t)[/tex]
[tex]f(t)=\frac{16}{2}(\sqrt3\cos t+\sin t)[/tex]
[tex]f(t)=8(\sqrt3\cos t+\sin t)[/tex]
We know, [tex]L(\cos at)=\frac{s}{s^2+a^2}[/tex] and [tex]L(\sin at)=\frac{a}{s^2+a^2}[/tex]
Applying Laplace in function,
[tex]L\{f(t)\}=8\sqrt3L(\cos t)+8L(\sin t)[/tex]
[tex]L\{f(t)\}=8\sqrt3(\frac{s}{s^2+1})+8(\frac{1}{s^2+1})[/tex]
[tex]L\{f(t)\}=\frac{8\sqrt3s+8}{s^2+1}[/tex]
[tex]L\{f(t)\}=\frac{8(\sqrt3s+1)}{s^2+1}[/tex]
Therefore, The Laplace transformation is [tex]L\{f(t)\}=\frac{8(\sqrt3s+1)}{s^2+1}[/tex]
Final answer:
In this college-level mathematics question, the task is to find ℒ{f(t)} by employing a trigonometric identity. By rewriting the function f(t) = 16cos(t−π/6) in terms of sine and utilizing a trigonometric identity, we find ℒ{f(t)} = 16s / (s^2 + 1).
Explanation:
To find ℒ{f(t)} by utilizing a trigonometric identity, first rewrite the function f(t) = 16cos(t−π/6) in terms of sine. Use the trigonometric identity cos(a) = sin(a + π/2) to rewrite cos(t−π/6) as sin(t−π/6 + π/2). This simplifies to sin(t−π/3). Thus, ℒ{f(t)} = 16 * ℒ{cos(t−π/6)}
= 16 * ℒ{sin(t−π/3)} = 16 * (s / (s^2 + 1)).
Therefore, the answer is 16s / (s^2 + 1).
sin t sin 3t sin 5t = 1/4(-sin t + sin 3t +sin 7t - sin 9t).
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Sin t . Sin 3t . Sin 5t = 1/4 [ - Sin t + Sin 3t + Sin 7t - Sin 9t ]
Take Right hand side and use the following formula
[tex]sin C - sin D = 2 Cos\left ( \frac{C+D}{2} \right )Sin\left ( \frac{C-D}{2} \right )[/tex]
[tex]Cos C - Cos D = 2 Sin\left ( \frac{C+D}{2} \right )Sin\left ( \frac{D-C}{2} \right )[/tex]
Take right hand side
[tex]\frac{1}{4}\left (Sin 3t - Sin t + Sin 7t - Sin 9t \right )[/tex]
[tex]\frac{1}{4}\left (2 Cos 2t Sin t +2 Sin (-t)Cos 8t \right )[/tex]
[tex]\frac{1}{4}\times 2 Sin t\left (Cos 2t-Cos8t \right )[/tex]
[tex]\frac{1}{4}\times 2 Sin t\ \times 2 \times Sin 5t\times 3t[/tex]
Sin t . Sin 3t . Sin 5t
So, LHS = RHS
Find the reduced row echelon form of the following matrices and then give the solution to the system that is represented by the augmented matrix. TO 4 7 0 6. a. 2 1 0 0 Lo 3 1 - 4 6. b. 54 30 71 8 6 2 -3 4 3 2 -10]
Answer:
a)
Reduced Row Echelon:
[tex]\left[\begin{array}{cccc}1&1/2&0&0\\0&1&7/4&0\\0&0&1&-4\end{array}\right][/tex]
Solution to the system:
[tex]x_3=-4\\x_2=-\frac{7}{4}x_3=7\\x_1=-\frac{1}{2}x_2=-\frac{7}{2}[/tex]
b)
Reduced Row Echelon:
[tex]\left[\begin{array}{cccc}4&3&0&7\\0&0&2&-17\\0&0&2&-17\end{array}\right][/tex]
Solution to the system:
[tex]x_3=-\frac{17}{2}\\x_1=\frac{7-3x_2}{4}[/tex]
x_2 is a free variable, meaning that it has infinite possibilities and therefore the system has infinite number of solutions.
Step-by-step explanation:
To find the reduced row echelon form of the matrices, let's use the Gaussian-Jordan elimination process, which consists of taking the matrix and performing a series of row operations. For notation, R_i will be the transformed column, and r_i the unchanged one.
a) [tex]\left[\begin{array}{cccc}0&4&7&0\\2&1&0&0\\0&3&1&-4\end{array}\right][/tex]
Step by step operations:
1. Reorder the rows, interchange Row 1 with Row 2, then apply the next operations on the new rows:
[tex]R_1=\frac{1}{2}r_1\\R_2=\frac{1}{4}r_2[/tex]
Resulting matrix:
[tex]\left[\begin{array}{cccc}1&1/2&0&0\\0&1&7/4&0\\0&3&1&-4\end{array}\right][/tex]
2. Set the first row to 1
[tex]R_3=-3r_2+r_3[/tex]
Resulting matrix:
[tex]\left[\begin{array}{cccc}1&1/2&0&0\\0&1&7/4&0\\0&0&1&-4\end{array}\right][/tex]
3. Write the system of equations:
[tex]x_1+\frac{1}{2}x_2=0\\x_2+\frac{7}{4}x_3=0\\x_3=-4[/tex]
Now you have the reduced row echelon matrix and can solve the equations, bottom to top, x_1 is column 1, x_2 column 2 and x_3 column 3:
[tex]x_3=-4\\x_2=-\frac{7}{4}x_3=7\\x_1=-\frac{1}{2}x_2=-\frac{7}{2}[/tex]
b)
[tex]\left[\begin{array}{cccc}4&3&0&7\\8&6&2&-3\\4&3&2&-10\end{array}\right][/tex]
1. [tex]R_2=-2r_1+r_2\\R_3=-r_1+r_3[/tex]
Resulting matrix:
[tex]\left[\begin{array}{cccc}4&3&0&7\\0&0&2&-17\\0&0&2&-17\end{array}\right][/tex]
2. Write the system of equations:
[tex]4x_1+3x_2=7\\2x_3=-17[/tex]
Now you have the reduced row echelon matrix and can solve the equations, bottom to top, x_1 is column 1, x_2 column 2 and x_3 column 3:
[tex]x_3=-\frac{17}{2}\\x_1=\frac{7-3x_2}{4}[/tex]
x_2 is a free variable, meaning that it has infinite possibilities and therefore the system has infinite number of solutions.
The supply equation for an olive oil press is
S(q) = 5q^2 + 1,000q + 100
where S(q) is the price in dollars at which q units are supplied. Find the quantity supplied in a month when the company sets the price of its olive oil press at $12,820
Answer:
12 units
Step-by-step explanation:
The given function is
[tex]S(q) = 5q^2 + 1000q + 100[/tex]
where, S(q) is the price in dollars at which q units are supplied.
We need to find the quantity supplied in a month when the company sets the price of its olive oil press at $12,820.
Substitute S(q)=12820 in the given function.
[tex]12820 = 5q^2 + 1000q + 100[/tex]
Subtract both sides by 12820.
[tex]0= 5q^2 + 1000q - 12720[/tex]
Taking out GCF.
[tex]0= 5(q^2 + 200q - 2544)[/tex]
Now solve the equation for q by splitting the middle term.
[tex]0= 5(q^2 + 212q-12q - 2544)[/tex]
[tex]0= 5(q(q + 212)-12(q + 212))[/tex]
[tex]0= 5(q + 212)(q-12)[/tex]
Using zero product property we get
[tex]q + 212=0\Rightarrow q=-212[/tex]
[tex]q-12=0\Rightarrow q=12[/tex]
q is number of units. So the value of q can not be negative.
Therefore the quantity supplied in a month when the company sets the price of its olive oil press at $12,820 is 12 units.
Suppose a simple random sample of size nequals=6464 is obtained from a population with mu equals 84μ=84 and sigma equals 16σ=16. (a) Describe the sampling distribution of x overbarx. (b) What is Upper P (x overbar greater than 87.6 )P x>87.6? (c) What is Upper P (x overbar less than or equals 79.2 )P x≤79.2? (d) What is Upper P (81.3 less than x overbar less than 87.6 )P 81.3
Answer:
a. [tex]\bar X[/tex] is distributed [tex]N(84;4)[/tex]
b. [tex]P(\bar X \geq 87.6) = 0.03593[/tex]
c. [tex]P(\bar X \leq 79.2) = 0.00820[/tex]
d. [tex]P(\79.2 \leq \bar X \leq 87.6) = 0.95587[/tex]
Step-by-step explanation:
a.
The central limit theorem states that, for large n, the sampling distribution of the sample mean is approximately normal with mean [tex]\µ[/tex] and variance [tex]\frac{\sigma^2}{n}[/tex], then, the sample mean is distributed as a normal random variable with means [tex]\mu_{\bar X}=\mu=84[/tex] and variance [tex]\sigma^2_{\bar X}=\frac{\sigma^2}{n}=\frac{16^2}{64}=4[/tex].
b.
[tex]P(\bar X \geq 87.6) = 0.03593[/tex]
c.
[tex]P(\bar X \leq 79.2) = 0.00820[/tex]
d.
[tex]P(\79.2 \leq \bar X \leq 87.6) = 0.95587[/tex]
A cell phone company offers two different plans. Plan A costs $99 per month for unlimited talk and text. Plan B costs $0.20 per minute plus $0.10 per text message sent. You need to purchase a plan for your teenage sister. Your sister currently uses 1,750 minutes and sends 1,700 texts each month. What is your sister’s total cost under each of the two plans?
Find the point of intersection of the pair of straight lines.
10x - 4y = 43
-3x - 3y = -15
(x, y) = ( , )
Answer:
(x,y) = ([tex]\frac{9}{2}[/tex],[tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex])
Step-by-step explanation:
We have to find point of intersection of two lines.
the given equations of line are:
10x - 4y = 43 - (1)
-3x - 3y = -15 - (2)
Multiplying the first equation by 3 we have:
(10x - 4y = 43)×3 = 30x - 12 y = 129 - (3)
Multiplying second equation by 10 we have :
(-3x - 3y = -15)×10 = -30x -30y = -150 - (4)
Now, adding equation (3) and (4) we have:
-42y = -21
⇒ y = [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex]
Now, putting this value of y in equation (1), we have
10x - 2 = 43
⇒ 10x = 45
⇒x = [tex]\frac{9}{2}[/tex]
Hence, the intersection of given two lines is (x,y) = ([tex]\frac{9}{2}[/tex],[tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex])
The author of a book was told that he would have to cut the number of pages by 17% for the book to sell at a popular price and still make a profit.
Step 1 of 3: If these cuts were made, what percent of the original number of pages was in the final version?
Answer:
83%
Step-by-step explanation:
100% - 17% = 83%
Cutting the number of pages by 17% leaves 83% of the original number of pages.
After reducing the number of pages by 17%, the final version of the book contains 83% of the original number of pages.
Explanation:If the author of a book was told to cut the number of pages by 17%, we want to determine what percent of the original pages remained in the final version. To do this, we subtract the percentage of the pages cut from 100% (which represents the original number of pages).
100% - 17% = 83%.
Therefore, after a 17% cut, 83% percent of the pages are left in the final version of the book.
Learn more about Percentage Calculation here:https://brainly.com/question/32197511
#SPJ2
In the following pair of polynomials, the second polynomial is a factor of the first. Factor completely x^3+3x^2-18x , x-4
Answer:
The required factors are: x, (x + 6) and (x - 3).
Step-by-step explanation:
As per the question,
The given polynomial is:
[tex]x^{3}+3x^{2}-18x[/tex]
Now,
BY factorization, we get
[tex]x^{3}+3x^{2}-18x[/tex]
[tex]=x(x^{2}+3x-18)[/tex]
By splitting the mid-term, that is split 3x like:
3x = 6x - 3x
Therefore,
[tex]x(x^{2}+6x-3x-18)[/tex]
Now on further solving by taking common factor out, we get
[tex]=x[x(x+6)-3(x+6)][/tex]
[tex]=x(x+6)(x-3)[/tex]
Therefore, the given second polynomial (x - 4), is not a factor of given polynomial [tex]x^{3}+3x^{2}-18x[/tex].
Hence, the given polynomial has three factor x, (x + 6) and (x - 3).
Drag a statement or reason to each box to complete this proof.
If −2(x+1)=8, then x=−5.
(Look at the photo)
Answer:
The proof will be as follows
Statement Reason
1. -2(x+1) = 8 Given
2. -2(x+1)/ -2 = 8/-2 Division Property of equality
3. x+1 = -4 Simplifying
4. x+1-1 = -4-1 Subtraction property of Equality
5. x = -5 Simplifying
The option of Distributive property of equality will not be used ..
A farmer looks out into the barnyard and sees the pigs and the chickens. He says to his daughter, "I count 153 heads and 346 feet. How many pigs and how many chickens are out there?"
Answer: There are 133 chickens and 20 pigs.
Step-by-step explanation:
Let x be the number of chickens and y be the number of pigs.
Given : Number of heads of pigs and chicken = 153
Number of feet = 346
Since one chicken has 2 legs and one pig has 4 legs.
By considering the given information, we have the following system of equations:-
[tex]x+y=153------(1)\\\\ 2x+4y=346---------(2)[/tex]
Multiply 2 on both sides of (1), we get
[tex]2x+2y=306-----(3)[/tex]
Subtract (3) from (2), we get
[tex]2y=40\\\\\Rightarrow\ y=\dfrac{40}{2}=20[/tex]
Put value of y in (1), we get
[tex]x+20=153\\\\\Rightarrow\ x=153-20=133[/tex]
Hence, there are 133 chickens and 20 pigs.
Final answer:
The problem is a system of linear equations in Mathematics, where we find that there are 133 chickens and 20 pigs in the barnyard after setting up and solving the equations based on the given number of heads and feet.
Explanation:
Let's denote the number of chickens as C and the number of pigs as P. Therefore, we have two equations based on the given information:
C + P = 153 (since each animal has one head)
2C + 4P = 346 (since chickens have 2 feet and pigs have 4 feet)
By solving these equations, we can find the values for C and P. Multiplying the first equation by -2 and adding it to the second equation, we eliminate C and get:
-2C - 2P = -306
2C + 4P = 346
-----------------
2P = 40
Dividing both sides by 2, we find that P = 20. Substituting this value back into the first equation, we get C + 20 = 153, which means C = 133.
Therefore, there are 133 chickens and 20 pigs in the barnyard.
The measure of the angles of a triangle are x, 2x, and 3x.What
are the measures of the angles of the triangle ?
Answer: [tex]30^{\circ},\ 60^{\circ},\ 90^{\circ}[/tex]
Step-by-step explanation:
We know that the sum of measure of all the angles of a triangle is 180°.
Given : The measure of the angles of a triangle are x, 2x, and 3x.
Then, the sum of all the angle will be given by :-
[tex]x+2x+3x=180^{\circ}\\\\\Rightarrow\ 6x=180^{\circ}\\\\\Rightarrow\ x=\dfrac{180^{\circ}}{6}=30^{\circ}[/tex]
Then, the measures of angles of the triangle will be : [tex]30^{\circ},\ 2(30^{\circ}),\ 3(30^{\circ})[/tex]
i.e. [tex]30^{\circ},\ 60^{\circ},\ 90^{\circ}[/tex]
Which of these statements are Qualitative, as opposed to Quantitative? Choose all correct answers. A. The flower is red. B. The bug is 5cm long. C. The candy was sour. D. You have three sisters. DQuestion 6 1 pts
Final answer:
The qualitative statements are A. The flower is red. and C. The candy was sour. The quantitative statements are B. The bug is 5cm long. and D. You have three sisters.
Explanation:
The qualitative statement refers to descriptions that do not involve numerical values or measurements. On the other hand, quantitative statements involve numerical values or measurements. Based on these definitions, the qualitative statements in the given options are:
A. The flower is red.
C. The candy was sour.
The quantitative statements in the given options are:
B. The bug is 5cm long.
D. You have three sisters.
Pigeon Hole Principle :
Prove that given any set of n + 1 integers, there must be at least one pair among them whose difference is divisible by n
Step-by-step explanation:
When you divide an integer number by n, you get a remainder of either 0, 1, 2, ..., n-1 (for example 5 divided by 2 leaves a remainder of 1, or 13 divided by 5 leaves a remainder of 3, or 16 divided by 2 leaves a remainder of 0, and so on).
So there are n different remainders we could get when dividing an integer number by n. If we are given n+1 numbers, they each leave a certain remainder when divided by n. Since there are only n possible remainders, and we have n+1 numbers, by the pigeonhole principle we know there must be at least 2 numbers that leave the same remainder when divided by n. Call them numbers a and b, and let's call r the remainder they leave when divided by n. So both a and b are of the form:
[tex] a=kn+r[/tex] (for some integer k)
[tex] b=ln+r[/tex] (for some integer l)
(this is exactly what it means to leave a remainder of r when divided by n)
And so their difference is
[tex] a-b=kn+r-(ln+r)=kn-ln=(k-l)n[/tex]
Which is divisible by n by definition of being divisible (or think of it as a-b being a multiple of n, so it's divisible by n).
The brain volumes (cm3) of 20 brains have a mean of 1094.9 cm3 and a standard deviation of 128.9 cm3. Use the given standard deviation and the range rule of thumb to identify the limits separating values that are significantly low or significantly high. For such data, would a brain volume of 1392.7 cm3 be significantly high?
Answer:
Yes, a brain volume of [tex] 1392.7 cm^{3}[/tex] is significantly high.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given
Standard deviation = [tex] 128.9 cm^{3}[/tex]Mean = [tex] 1094.9 cm^{3}[/tex]The range rule of thumb indicates that the usual values are within 2 standard deviations from the mean:
minimum usual value = mean - 2 * standard deviation = [tex]1094.9 - 2*128.9=837.1 cm^{3}[/tex]
maximum usual value = mean + 2 * standard deviation = [tex]1094.9 + 2*128.9=1352.7 cm^{3}[/tex]
We can see that [tex] 1392.7 cm^{3}[/tex] is not between [tex] 837.1 cm^{3}[/tex] and [tex] 1352.7 cm^{3}[/tex], which indicates that this value is unusually high.
Using the range rule of thumb, it is found that:
The limit separating the values that are significantly low is 837.1 cm³.The limit separating the values that are significantly high is 1352.7 cm³.1392.7 cm³ is above 1352.7 cm³, thus, a brain volume of 1392.7 cm³ would be considered significantly high.----------------------------
The range rule of thumb states that:
Measures that are more than 2 standard deviations below the mean are significantly low.Measures that are more than 2 standard deviations above the mean are significantly high.----------------------------
The mean is 1094.9.The standard deviation is 128.9.----------------------------
2 standard deviations below the mean is given by:[tex]1094.9 - 2(128.9) = 837.1[/tex]
The limit separating the values that are significantly low is 837.1 cm³.----------------------------
2 standard deviations above the mean is given by:[tex]1094.9 + 2(128.9) = 1352.7[/tex]
The limit separating the values that are significantly high is 1352.7 cm³.----------------------------
1392.7 cm³ is above 1352.7 cm³, thus, a brain volume of 1392.7 cm³ would be considered significantly high.A similar problem is given at https://brainly.com/question/24126815
Joan Messineo borrowed $47,000 at a 5% annual rate of interest to be repaid over 3 years. The loan is amortized into three equal, annual, end-of-year payments.
a. Calculate the annual, end-of-year loan payment.
b. Prepare a loan amortization schedule showing the interest and principal breakdown of each of the three loan payments.
c. Explain why the interest portion of each payment declines with the passage of time.
Answer:
a) The value of the Annual Payment is A=$17,258.80
b) Is the picture in the attachment file
c) As you can see it in the picture with each payment, balance comes down, due it is the interest base, Interest portion comes down too.
Step-by-step explanation:
Hi
a) First of all, we are going to list the Knowns: [tex]VP=47000[/tex], [tex]i=5[/tex]% and [tex]n=3[/tex], Then we can use [tex]A=\frac{VP}{\frac{1-(1+i)^{-n} }{i} } =\frac{47000}{\frac{1-(1+0.05)^{-3} }{0.03} }=17258.80[/tex]. So this is the value of the Annual Payment
Joan Messines's annual payment on her $47,000 loan at 5% interest over 3 years is $17,158.11. The interest portion of each payment declines over time due to the decreasing loan balance, leading to a smaller interest calculation base in each subsequent year.
Joan Messines borrowed $47,000 at a 5% annual rate of interest to be repaid over 3 years. The loan is amortized into three equal, annual, end-of-year payments.
Calculation of the Annual Loan Payment
To calculate the annual payment, we use the formula for an annuity:
PV = PMT [(1 - (1 + r)^-n) / r]
Where:
PV is the present value of the loan (initial loan amount).
PMT is the annual payment.
r is the annual interest rate (expressed as a decimal).
n is the number of years.
Rearranging the formula to solve for PMT yields:
PMT = PV / [(1 - (1 + r)^-n) / r]
Substitute PV = $47,000, r = 0.05 (5%), and n = 3:
PMT = $47,000 / [(1 - (1 + 0.05)^-3) / 0.05]
PMT = $17,158.11 (rounded to the nearest cent).
Loan Amortization Schedule
Year 1: Interest = $47,000 * 5% = $2,350; Principal = $17,158.11 - $2,350 = $14,808.11; Remaining Balance = $47,000 - $14,808.11 = $32,191.89
Year 2: Interest = $32,191.89 * 5% = $1,609.59; Principal = $17,158.11 - $1,609.59 = $15,548.52; Remaining Balance = $32,191.89 - $15,548.52 = $16,643.37
Year 3: Interest = $16,643.37 * 5% = $832.17; Principal = $17,158.11 - $832.17 = $16,325.94; Remaining Balance = $16,643.37 - $16,325.94 = $317.43
Why the Interest Portion Declines Over Time
The interest portion of each payment declines with the passage of time because as the loan principal is paid down, there is a smaller balance on which interest is calculated. This results in a decreasing interest payment and an increasing principal payment with each subsequent payment until the loan is paid off.
A patient is instructed to take three 50-mcg tablets of pergolide mesylate (Permax) daily. How many milligrams of the drug would the patient receive weekly?
Answer:
The patient would receive 1.05mg of the drug weekly.
Step-by-step explanation:
First step: How many mcg of the drug would the patient receive daily?
The problem states that he takes three doses of 50-mcg a day. So
1 dose - 50mcg
3 doses - x mcg
x = 50*3
x = 150 mcg.
He takes 150mcg of the drug a day.
Second step: How many mcg of the drug would the patient receive weekly?
A week has 7 days. He takes 150mcg of the drug a day. So:
1 day - 150mcg
7 days - x mcg
x = 150*7
x = 1050mcg
He takes 1050mcg of the drug a week.
Final step: Conversion of 1050 mcg to mg
Each mg has 1000 mcg. How many mg are there in 1050 mcg? So
1mg - 1000 mcg
xmg - 1050mcg
1000x = 1050
[tex]x = \frac{1050}{1000}[/tex]
x = 1.05mg
The patient would receive 1.05mg of the drug weekly.
The patient receives 0.15 milligrams of pergolide mesylate daily and thus 1.05 milligrams weekly.
Explanation:To calculate the weekly dosage of pergolide mesylate in milligrams, we first need to understand the daily dosage. The patient takes three 50-mcg tablets daily, which is 150 mcg daily. Knowing that 1 mg (milligram) is equal to 1000 mcg (micrograms), we can convert the daily dose to milligrams by dividing by 1000 which is 0.15 mg daily. To find the weekly dosage, we multiply this daily total by 7 (since there are 7 days in a week), which gives us 1.05 milligrams weekly.
Learn more about dosage calculation here:https://brainly.com/question/31339825
#SPJ3
A class survey found that 29 students watched television on Monday, 24 on Tuesday, and 25 on Wednesday. Of those who watched TV on only one of these days, 13 choose Monday, 9 chose Tuesday, and 10 chose Wednesday. Every student watched TV on at least one of these days, and 12 students watched TV on all three days. If 14 students watched TV on both Monday and Tuesday, how many students were there in the class
Final answer:
There are 108 students in the class, calculated using the data from the class survey with the principle of inclusion-exclusion.
Explanation:
To find out how many students are in the class, we should analyze the survey data provided. We know that:
29 students watched TV on Monday.
24 students watched TV on Tuesday.
25 students watched TV on Wednesday.
13 students watched TV on only Monday.
9 students watched TV on only Tuesday.
10 students watched TV on only Wednesday.
12 students watched TV on all three days.
14 students watched TV on both Monday and Tuesday.
Since 14 watched on both Monday and Tuesday, and 12 of those also watched on Wednesday, there are 14 - 12 = 2 who watched on Monday and Tuesday but not Wednesday.
We can now calculate the total number of students using the principle of inclusion-exclusion:
Start with the total number of students who watched TV each day: 29 + 24 + 25 = 78.
Subtract the students who were counted twice because they watched on two different days: 78 - 2 (from Monday and Tuesday) = 76.
Subtract the students who watched on all three days, as they have been counted three times: 76 - 12 = 64.
Add back the number of students who watched TV on all three days to account for their previous subtraction: 64 + 12 = 76.
Add the students who watched TV on only one specific day to avoid double-counting those who were included in the two and three days' viewership: 76 + 13 (Monday only) + 9 (Tuesday only) + 10 (Wednesday only) = 108.
Therefore, there are 108 students in the class.
Suppose you have a gift certificate worth $20 for one long-distance phone call. If the charge is $1.10 for the first minute and $0.42 for each additional minute, what is the longest that you can talk?
Answer:
46 minutes.
Step-by-step explanation:
You have a gift certificate worth $20 for one long-distance phone call.
The charge for the first minute = $1.10
Let the other additional minutes that you can talk = x
The charges for the x minutes = 0.42 per minute
the equation will be : 1.10 + 0.42x = 20
0.42x = 20 - 1.10
0.42x = 18.90
x = [tex]\frac{18.90}{0.42}[/tex]
x = 45
1 minute for $1.10 + 45 minutes for $0.42/min.
you can talk for 46 minutes.
The longest phone call you can make with a $20 gift certificate, given the cost structure of $1.10 for the first minute and $0.42 for each additional minute, is approximately 46 minutes.
Explanation:The subject of this question is Mathematics, specifically related to linear equations and budget constraints in the context of phone call charges. To find the longest time you can talk on the phone using your gift certificate, you'll need to understand the cost structure. The charge is $1.10 for the first minute - that leaves you with $18.90 from the gift certificate for the remaining time ($20 - $1.10). Each additional minute costs $0.42. Now, divide the remaining amount in your gift certificate by the cost per additional minute: $18.90 ÷ $0.42 ≈ 45 minutes. Adding back the first minute, the longest call you can make with the gift certificate is approximately 46 minutes
.
Learn more about Linear Equations here:
https://brainly.com/question/32634451
#SPJ3
You are visiting a rainforest, but unfortunately,your insect repellent has run out. As a result, at each second, a mosquito lands on your neck with probability 0.5. If a mosquito lands, it will bite you with probability 0.2, and it will never bother you with probability 0.8, independently of other mosquitoes. What is the expected time between successive bites?
Final answer:
The expected time between successive mosquito bites is calculated using the probabilities of landing and biting, resulting in an average time of 10 seconds between bites.
Explanation:
The expected time between successive mosquito bites can be calculated by considering the probabilities of two independent events: a mosquito landing on your neck and a mosquito bite, given that it has landed. As per the data provided, a mosquito lands with a probability of 0.5 per second, and out of those, it will bite with a probability of 0.2. The probability of getting bitten by a mosquito that has landed is then 0.5 (probability of landing) × 0.2 (probability of biting) = 0.1 per second.
To find the expected time between successive bites, we need to consider the inverse of this probability, which tells us that on average, you can expect to get bitten every 1/0.1 or 10 seconds.
The expected time between bites is 10 seconds.
To find the expected time between successive mosquito bites, we need to consider the probability of a mosquito biting you at any given second.
Given the probabilities:
Probability that a mosquito lands on your neck in a second: 0.5 = P(land)Probability that a mosquito bites you if it lands: 0.2 = P(bite | land)Probability that a mosquito doesn't bite you if it lands: 0.8 = [tex]P(not\ bite |\ land)[/tex]The combined probability that a mosquito both lands and bites in any given second is the product of the two probabilities:
[tex]P(bite) = P(land) * P(bite\ |\ land) = 0.5 * 0.2 = 0.1.[/tex]
To find the expected time between successive bites, we take the reciprocal of the probability of being bitten in a given second:
[tex]Expected time = \frac{1}{P(bite)} = \frac{1}{0.1} = 10\ seconds[/tex].
The expected time between successive mosquito bites is approximately 10 seconds.
Define a basis of a vector space
Answer:
Let V a vector space. And B a subset of elements in V.
B is a basis for V if satisfies the following conditions:
1. V= span(B). It means that every element of V can be written as a finite linear combination of elements of B.
2. B is a linear independent subset.
Define the following propositions: .p: You drive over 65 miles per hour q You get a speeding ticket Translate the following English sentence into logical expressions using the definitions above (a) You drive over 65 miles per hour, but you do not get a speeding ticket. (b) If you do not drive over 65 miles per hour, then you will not get a speeding ticket (c) You get a speeding ticket, but you did not drive over 65 miles per hour.
Answer:
(a) [tex]p \wedge -q[/tex]
(b) [tex]\neg p \Rightarrow \neg q[/tex]
(c) [tex]q \wedge -p[/tex]
Step-by-step explanation:
(a) You drive over 65 miles per hour, but you do not get a speeding ticket, it can be represented by: [tex]p \wedge -q[/tex]
(b) If you do not drive over 65 miles per hour, then you will not get a speeding ticket, it can be represented by: [tex]\neg p \Rightarrow \neg q[/tex]
(c) You get a speeding ticket, but you did not drive over 65 miles per hour, can be represented by: [tex]q \wedge -p[/tex]
The charge to rent a trailer is $20 for up to 2 hours plus $8 per additional hour or portion of an hour. Find the cost to rent a trailer for 2.9 hours, 3 hours, and 8.5 hours. Then graph all ordered pairs, (hours, cost), for the function.
What is the cost to rent a trailer for 2.9 hours?
What is the cost to rent a trailer for 3 hours?
What is the cost to rent a trailer for 8.5 hours?
What is the cost to rent a trailer for 9 hours?
Graph all ordered pairs, (hours, cost), for the function.
Answer:
The cost to rent a trailer for 2.9 hours is $27.2.
The cost to rent a trailer for 3 hours is $28.
The cost to rent a trailer for 8.5 hours is $72.
The cost to rent a trailer for 9 hours is $76.
Step-by-step explanation:
It is given that the charge to rent a trailer is $20 for up to 2 hours plus $8 per additional hour or portion of an hour.
Let x be the number of hours.
The cost to rent a trailer for x hours is defined as
[tex]C(x)=\begin{cases}20 & \text{ if } x\leq 2 \\ 20+8(x-2) & \text{ if } x>2 \end{cases}[/tex]
For x>2,
[tex]C(x)=20+8(x-2)[/tex]
Substitute x=2.9 in the cost function.
[tex]C(x)=20+8(2.9-2)=27.2[/tex]
The cost to rent a trailer for 2.9 hours is $27.2.
Substitute x=3 in the cost function.
[tex]C(x)=20+8(3-2)=28[/tex]
The cost to rent a trailer for 3 hours is $28.
Substitute x=8.5 in the cost function.
[tex]C(x)=20+8(8.5-2)=72[/tex]
The cost to rent a trailer for 8.5 hours is $72.
Substitute x=9 in the cost function.
[tex]C(x)=20+8(9-2)=76[/tex]
The cost to rent a trailer for 9 hours is $76.
All ordered pairs, in the form of (hours, cost) are (2.9, 27.2), (3,28), (8.5, 72) and (9,76).
The graph of all ordered pairs is shown below.
Final answer:
The costs to rent a trailer for 2.9 and 3 hours are both $28, for 8.5 and 9 hours are both $76. To plot this function, one must mark these costs against the rental hours, showing a flat rate for the first two hours and additional charges thereafter.
Explanation:
The question asks for the cost of renting a trailer for varying numbers of hours and then requires plotting a graph with these costs against the hours. The rental system has a flat rate of $20 for the first 2 hours, and an additional charge of $8 for each hour or part of an hour thereafter.
Cost for 2.9 hours: Since any portion of an hour counts as a full hour, renting for 2.9 hours is essentially renting for 3 hours. The first 2 hours cost $20, and for the additional 0.9 (considered as 1) hour, it's $8. Total cost: $20 + $8 = $28.Cost for 3 hours: The calculation is the same as for 2.9 hours, so the cost is also $28.Cost for 8.5 hours: This includes the first 2 hours plus an additional 6.5 hours (considered as 7 hours). Therefore, the cost is $20 + ($8 x 7) = $20 + $56 = $76.Cost for 9 hours: This is calculated similarly, resulting in a cost of $20 + ($8 x 7) = $76.To graph all ordered pairs, plot points for each of the time periods mentioned with their corresponding costs. Note how the graph demonstrates incremental jumps after the first 2 hours, reflecting the additional $8 charge per hour or part thereof.
Formulate but do not solve the problem. Michael Perez deposited a total of $2000 with two savings institutions. One pays interest at a rate of 5%/year, whereas the Other pays interest at a rate of 8%/year. If Michael earned a total of $130 in interest during a single year, how much did he deposit in each institution? (Let x and y denote the amount of money, in dollars, invested at 5% and 8%, respectively.) 0.06x 0.08yx130 X2000
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Michael Perez deposited a total of $2,000 with two savings institutions.
One pays interest at a rate of 5% per year whereas the other pays interest at a rate of 8% per year.
Let x denote the amount of money invested at 5%
y = 2000 - x ---(1)
Let y denote the amount of money invested at 8%
so 5x/100 + 8(2000-x)/100 = $130 ----(2)
Michael earned $130 in interest during a single year.