Find the? inverse, if it? exists, for the given matrix.

[4 3]

[3 6]

Answer:

21 % below what she needs

Step-by-step explanation:

She had hit 12, 10 and 9

This averages to

(12+10+9)/3 = 31/3 =10 1/3

She needs 13

Percentage = (needed-actual)/needed * 100%

                    = (13-10 1/3) / 13 * 100%

                    = (2 2/3) /13 * 100%

                    =.205128205 * 100%

                   =20.5128205%

To the nearest whole number

                      21 %

She is 21 % below what she needs

Samantha's current average free throw percentage is 15 percentage points away from the 65% needed to earn her wellness challenge chip.

Samantha is working on improving her free throw percentage in basketball, and she needs to calculate how far her average is from the required target to earn her wellness challenge chip. To determine her average free throw percentage, we first calculate her average number of successful shots by adding her last three attempts and dividing by three: (12 + 10 + 9) / 3 = 31 / 3 = 10.33, rounded to 10 successful shots on average. Since she takes 20 shots each time, her average percentage is (10 / 20) * 100 = 50%.

To earn her chip, she needs to hit 13 out of 20 free throws, which is (13 / 20) * 100 = 65%. The difference between her current average and the needed percentage is 65% - 50% = 15%. Rounding to the nearest whole number, she is 15 percentage points away from the required free throw percentage to succeed in the challenge.

Final answer:

To solve for the width of the rectangle, define the width as w, set up the equation 144 = w(w + 10), and factor the resulting quadratic equation to find w = 8 inches. Hence, the rectangle's dimensions are 8 inches in width and 18 inches in length.

Explanation:

To find the dimensions of a rectangle with an area of 144 square inches where the length is 10 inches longer than its width, we first recall the formula for the area of a rectangle:

Area = Length × Width

Let's define the width as w, and since the length is 10 inches longer, we can say the length is w + 10. Plugging these into the area formula we get:

144 = w × (w + 10)

Now, we have a quadratic equation to solve for w:

Expand the equation: 144 = w2 + 10w

Subtract 144 from both sides to set the equation to zero: w2 + 10w - 144 = 0

Factor the quadratic equation: (w + 18)(w - 8) = 0

Solve for w: w = -18 or w = 8 (since width cannot be negative, w = 8 is the solution.)

Therefore, the dimensions of the rectangle are a width of 8 inches and a length of 18 inches (8 + 10).

Answer:

Total number of ways will be 209

Step-by-step explanation:

There are 6 boys and 4 girls in a group and 4 children are to be selected.

We have to find the number of ways that 4 children can be selected if at least one boy must be in the group of 4.

So the groups can be arranged as

(1 Boy + 3 girls), (2 Boy + 2 girls), (3 Boys + 1 girl), (4 boys)

Now we will find the combinations in which these arrangements can be done.

1 Boy and 3 girls = [tex]^{6}C_{1}\times^{4}C_{3}=6\times4[/tex]=24

2 Boy and 2 girls=[tex]^{6}C_{2}\times^{4}C_{2}=\frac{6!}{4!\times2!}\times\frac{4!}{2!\times2!}=15\times6=90[/tex]

3 Boys and 1 girl = [tex]^{6}C_{3}\times^{4}C_{1}=\frac{6!}{4!\times2!}\times\frac{4!}{3!}=\frac{6\times5\times4}{3 \times2} \times4=80[/tex]

4 Boys = [tex]^{6}C_{4}=\frac{6!}{4!\times2!} =\frac{6\times 5}{2\times1}=15[/tex]

Now total number of ways = 24 + 90 + 80 + 15 = 209

Answer:

The required sales in units to achieve its target net income is 1,237,500 units.

Step-by-step explanation:

From the given information it is clear that

Fixed cost = $480,000

Selling Price = $6 per unit

Variable Cost = $4.4 per unit

Target net income = $1,500,000

We need to find the required sales in units to achieve its target net income.

[tex]Units=\frac{\text{Fixed cost + Target net income}}{\text{Selling Price - Variable Cost}}[/tex]

[tex]Units=\frac{480000+1500000}{6-4.4}[/tex]

[tex]Units=\frac{1980000}{1.6}[/tex]

[tex]Units=1237500[/tex]

Therefore the required sales in units to achieve its target net income is 1,237,500 units.

Apparently this solution is too long for posting, so I've written it elsewhere and am attaching screenshots of it.

The first four terms of each solution are

[tex]1-\dfrac23x^3+\dfrac5{36}x^6-\dfrac{10}{567}x^9[/tex]

and

[tex]x-\dfrac1{24}x^4+\dfrac1{315}x^7-\dfrac7{32,400}x^{10}[/tex]

Answer: Null hypothesis = [tex]H_0:p=0.74[/tex]

Alternative hypothesis = [tex]H_1:p\neq0.24[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Given claim : 74% of workers got their job through college.

In proportion , 0.74 of workers got their job through college.

Let p be the proportion of workers got their job through college.

Then claim : [tex]p=0.74[/tex]

We know that the null hypothesis always takes equality sign and alternative hypothesis takes just opposite of the null hypothesis.

Thus, Null hypothesis = [tex]H_0:p=0.74[/tex]

Alternative hypothesis = [tex]H_1:p\neq0.24[/tex]

Answer:

1. { a, b, c, d, e, h }

2. { f, g, i }

Step-by-step explanation:

Given sets,

A = {a, b, c, d, e},

B = {a, c, f, g, i}

Universal set , ∪ = {a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i},

1. Since, [tex]B^c[/tex] = elements of universal set which are not in set B

=  U - B

= { b, d, e, h },

Thus,

[tex]A\cup B^c[/tex] = All elements of A and [tex]B^c[/tex]

= { a, b, c, d, e, h }

2. B - A = elements of set B which are not in set A

= { f, g, i }

Answer:

These two samples are independent samples.

Step-by-step explanation:

Each object would then have two weight values (one from scale 1 and one from scale 2). Based on the nature of the differences in the two weight measurements for the 30 objects, the two scales may be compared.

These two samples are independent samples.

Though the objects are same but the scales are different.

Answer:

The probability is 0.995 ( approx ).

Step-by-step explanation:

Let X represents the event of baby girl,

The probability of a baby being a girl is, p = 0.469,

So, the probability of a baby who is not a girl is, q = 1 - 0.469 = 0.531,

Also, the total number of experiment, n = 7

Thus, by the binomial distribution formula,

[tex]P(x)=^nC_x(p)^x q^{n-x}[/tex]

Where, [tex]^nC_x=\frac{n!}{x!(n-x)!}[/tex]

The probability that all babies are girl or there is no baby boy,

[tex]P(X=7)=^7C_7(0.469)^7(0.531)^{7-7}[/tex]

[tex]=0.00499125661758[/tex]

Hence, the probability that at least one of them is a boy​ = 1 - P(X=7)

= 1 - 0.00499125661758

= 0.995008743382

≈ 0.995

Answer with explanation:

Here, a and b are two real numbers.

Arithmetic Mean of a and b

          [tex]A=\frac{a+b}{2}[/tex]

[tex]\rightarrow a< \frac{a+b}{2}<b[/tex]

Geometric Mean of a and b

         [tex]G=\sqrt{ab}[/tex]

[tex]\rightarrow a< \sqrt{ab}<b[/tex]

[tex]A-G\\\\=\frac{a+b}{2}-\sqrt{ab}\\\\=\frac{a+b-2\sqrt{ab}}{2}\\\\=[\frac{\sqrt{a}-\sqrt{b}}{\sqrt{2}}]^2>0\\\\A-G>0\\\\A>G[/tex]

Square of difference of any two numbers is greater than or equal to 0.

⇒A.M of two Numbers > G.M of two Numbers

Answer:

0.0358

Step-by-step explanation:

In a 52 deck, 13 cards are Clubs, and 26 cards are red.

There are ₁₃C₃ ways to choose 3 Clubs from 13.

There are ₂₆C₂ ways to choose 2 red cards from 26.

There are ₅₂C₅ ways to choose 5 cards from 52.

P = (₁₃C₃ ₂₆C₂) / ₅₂C₅

P = (286 × 325) / 2598960

P = 0.0358

Answer:  The list price was $1815.00.  

Step-by-step explanation:  Given that the discount on a LCD TV is $240 and the sale price is $1575.00.

We are to find the list price.

The discount is given on the price that is listen on the LCD TV.

So, the list price will be equal to the sum of the sale price and the discount price.

Therefore, the required list price of the LCD TV is given by

[tex]L.P.\\\\=\textup{sale price}+\textup{discount}\\\\=\$(1575.00+240.00)\\\\=\$1815.00.[/tex]

Thus, the list price was $1815.00.  

Answer:

5 pounds of nuts and 20 pounds of pretzels

Step-by-step explanation:

Let

x ----> the number of pounds of nuts

y ----> the number of pounds of pretzels

we know that

x+y=25

x=25-y ------> equation A

4x+2y=60 ---> equation B

Solve the system by substitution

Substitute equation A in equation B and solve for y

4(25-y)+2y=60

100-4y+2y=60

4y-2y=100-60

2y=40

y=20 pounds of pretzels

Find the value of x

x=25-y

x=25-20=5 pounds of nuts

Final answer:

Dave should use 5 pounds of nuts and 20 pounds of pretzels to make the party mix.

Explanation:

Let's assume that Dave buys x pounds of nuts and y pounds of pretzels. Since he wants to buy a total of 25 pounds of party mix, we can write the equation x + y = 25.

The cost of nuts per pound is $4 and the cost of pretzels per pound is $2. Therefore, the cost of x pounds of nuts is 4x dollars and the cost of y pounds of pretzels is 2y dollars.

We can write the equation 4x + 2y = 60 to represent the total cost of the party mix.

To solve this system of equations, we can use substitution. Solve the first equation for x in terms of y: x = 25 - y.

Substitute this expression for x into the second equation to get 4(25 - y) + 2y = 60.

Simplify this equation to get 100 - 4y + 2y = 60. Combine like terms to get -2y = -40. Divide both sides by -2 to solve for y: y = 20.

Substitute this value back into the first equation to find x: x = 25 - 20 = 5.

Therefore, Dave should use 5 pounds of nuts and 20 pounds of pretzels to make the party mix.

Answer:

total profit=$607.278

Step-by-step explanation:

company's profit in 1985= $535 million

company's profit in 1990=$570 million

growth rate = [tex]\frac{570-535}{535}\times 100[/tex]

                    = [tex]\frac{35}{535} \times 100[/tex]

                    = 6.54 %

profit in year 1995 will be = [tex]\frac{6.54}{100}\times 570 =\ \$37.278[/tex]

hence total profit= $570+$37.278

                             = $607.278

I'm partial to solving with generating functions. Let

[tex]T(x)=\displaystyle\sum_{n\ge0}t_nx^n[/tex]

Multiply both sides of the recurrence by [tex]x^{n+2}[/tex] and sum over all [tex]n\ge0[/tex].

[tex]\displaystyle\sum_{n\ge0}2t_{n+2}x^{n+2}=\sum_{n\ge0}3t_{n+1}x^{n+2}+\sum_{n\ge0}2t_nx^{n+2}[/tex]

Shift the indices and factor out powers of [tex]x[/tex] as needed so that each series starts at the same index and power of [tex]x[/tex].

[tex]\displaystyle2\sum_{n\ge2}2t_nx^n=3x\sum_{n\ge1}t_nx^n+2x^2\sum_{n\ge0}t_nx^n[/tex]

Now we can write each series in terms of the generating function [tex]T(x)[/tex]. Pull out the first few terms so that each series starts at the same index [tex]n=0[/tex].

[tex]2(T(x)-t_0-t_1x)=3x(T(x)-t_0)+2x^2T(x)[/tex]

Solve for [tex]T(x)[/tex]:

[tex]T(x)=\dfrac{2-3x}{2-3x-2x^2}=\dfrac{2-3x}{(2+x)(1-2x)}[/tex]

Splitting into partial fractions gives

[tex]T(x)=\dfrac85\dfrac1{2+x}+\dfrac15\dfrac1{1-2x}[/tex]

which we can write as geometric series,

[tex]T(x)=\displaystyle\frac8{10}\sum_{n\ge0}\left(-\frac x2\right)^n+\frac15\sum_{n\ge0}(2x)^n[/tex]

[tex]T(x)=\displaystyle\sum_{n\ge0}\left(\frac45\left(-\frac12\right)^n+\frac{2^n}5\right)x^n[/tex]

which tells us

[tex]\boxed{t_n=\dfrac45\left(-\dfrac12\right)^n+\dfrac{2^n}5}[/tex]

# # #

Just to illustrate another method you could consider, you can write the second recurrence in matrix form as

[tex]49y_{n+2}=-16y_n\implies y_{n+2}=-\dfrac{16}{49}y_n\implies\begin{bmatrix}y_{n+2}\\y_{n+1}\end{bmatrix}=\begin{bmatrix}0&-\frac{16}{49}\\1&0\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}y_{n+1}\\y_n\end{bmatrix}[/tex]

By substitution, you can show that

[tex]\begin{bmatrix}y_{n+2}\\y_{n+1}\end{bmatrix}=\begin{bmatrix}0&-\frac{16}{49}\\1&0\end{bmatrix}^{n+1}\begin{bmatrix}y_1\\y_0\end{bmatrix}[/tex]

or

[tex]\begin{bmatrix}y_n\\y_{n-1}\end{bmatrix}=\begin{bmatrix}0&-\frac{16}{49}\\1&0\end{bmatrix}^{n-1}\begin{bmatrix}y_1\\y_0\end{bmatrix}[/tex]

Then solving the recurrence is a matter of diagonalizing the coefficient matrix, raising to the power of [tex]n-1[/tex], then multiplying by the column vector containing the initial values. The solution itself would be the entry in the first row of the resulting matrix.

To cover a 6,000 square foot lawn, 192 ounces of fertilizer will be required. With the given cost of the fertilizer, the total cost to fertilize the lawn would be $9.36.

(a) To calculate how many ounces are required to cover a 6,000 square foot lawn, we can set up a proportion.

40 ounces of Lazy Lawn fertilizer covers 1,250 square feet, so let's represent it as 40/1250. We know that we have a 6,000 square foot lawn but we don't know how many ounces it requires, let's represent it as x/6000.

Our proportion will then be as follows: 40/1250 = x/6000. Cross multiply to find 'x', we will get x = [(40*6000)/1250] = 192 ounces.

(b) Now, to calculate the total cost we first need to know how many 24 ounce bags we will need. 192 ounces divided by 24 ounces per bag gives us 8 bags. Then we calculate the cost, 8 bags times $1.17 per bag gives us a total of $9.36.

https://brainly.com/question/32581317

#SPJ3

Answer:

So anyways the equation appears to be [tex]y=(x+4)^3+3[/tex].

Step-by-step explanation:

It looks like a cubic to me.

That is the parent function looks like [tex]f(x)=x^3[/tex].

I'm going to identify the transformations here by using the zero of the function I called f.  So where has the point (0,0) on [tex]y=x^3[/tex] wonder to in the new graph.  It appears to be (-4,3).  So the graph moved left 4 units and up 3 units.

f(x+4)+3 moves the graph left 4 and up 3.

----------Other notes:

f(x-4)+3 moves the graph right 4 and up 3.

f(x+4)-3 moves the graph left 4 and down 3.

f(x-4)-3 moves the graph right 4 and down 3.

So anyways the equation appears to be [tex]y=(x+4)^3+3[/tex].

To determine the equation of a transformed basic function, we typically look at how the graph's shape compares to one of the standard basic functions. The basic functions include linear functions, quadratic functions, absolute value functions, square root functions, cubic functions, and exponential and logarithmic functions. We also consider basic trigonometry functions for periodic graphs.
To find the equation, we need to identify four main transformations that may have been applied to the basic function:
1. **Vertical stretching/shrinking**: If the graph is stretched or shrunk vertically, this is represented by a multiplication factor `a` in front of the basic function `f(x)`.
2. **Horizontal stretching/shrinking**: If the graph is stretched or shrunk horizontally, this is represented by a factor within the function's argument, such as `f(bx)`, where `1/b` is the stretching/shrinking factor.
3. **Vertical shifting**: If the graph is shifted up or down, a constant `c` is added or subtracted from the function, giving `f(x) + c`.
4. **Horizontal shifting**: If the graph is shifted left or right, the function's input is adjusted by adding or subtracting a constant `d` within the argument of the function, yielding `f(x - d)`.
5. **Reflections**: If the graph is flipped over the x-axis, this is represented by a negative sign in front of the `a` factor. If it's flipped over the y-axis, the negative sign is inside the function's argument, `f(-x)`.
Without any specific details about the graph's appearance, the points, or what basic function it resembles, it is impossible to provide the exact transformed function. However, for illustrative purposes, I’ll demonstrate how one might find the equation for a transformed quadratic function based on hypothetical graph observations:
Suppose you find that the graph looks like a parabola that opens upwards and has been:
- Stretched vertically by a factor of 3 (vertical stretch)
- Compressed horizontally by a factor of 1/2 (horizontal stretch)
- Shifted up by 5 units (vertical shift)
- Shifted to the right by 4 units (horizontal shift)
With these observations, you would start with the standard quadratic function, `f(x) = x^2`, and apply the transformations:
1. Vertical stretch by 3: `f(x) = 3x^2`
2. Horizontal compression by a factor of 1/2, which is equivalent to stretching by a factor of 2: `f(x) = 3(x/2)^2 = 3(x^2/4) = (3/4)x^2`
3. Vertical shift up by 5 units: `f(x) = (3/4)x^2 + 5`
4. Horizontal shift right by 4 units: `f(x) = (3/4)(x - 4)^2 + 5`
The transformed function based on the hypothetical scenario would be `f(x) = (3/4)(x - 4)^2 + 5`.
Without specifics of the graph in question, you would follow a similar process: identify the basic function type based on the shape of the graph and apply the relevant transformations.

Answer: [tex]-3\dfrac{1}{2}[/tex].

Step-by-step explanation:

We know that the slope of a line passing through points (a,b) and (c,d) is given by :_

[tex]m=\dfrac{d-b}{c-a}[/tex]

The given points : (-4,3) and (-2, -4)

Now, the slope of the line passing through points (-4,3) and (-2, -4) is given by :-

[tex]m=\dfrac{-4-3}{-2-(-4)}\\\\\Rightarrow\ m=\dfrac{-7}{-2+4}\\\\\Rightarrow\ m=\dfrac{-7}{2}=-3\dfrac{1}{2}[/tex]

The slope of a line passing through points (-4,3) and (-2, -4) is [tex]-3\dfrac{1}{2}[/tex].

Answer:

Using the critical value rule, if a two-sided null hypothesis is rejected for a single mean at a given significance level, the corresponding one-sided null hypothesis will "always" be rejected at the same significance level.

Step-by-step explanation:

Consider the provided statement.

As the value of p is less than the significance level, therefore always reject the null hypothesis. Where p is exact level of significance.

Therefore, the answer to the statement is "Using the critical value rule, if a two-sided null hypothesis is rejected for a single mean at a given significance level, the corresponding one-sided null hypothesis (i.e., the same sample size, the same standard deviation, and the same mean) will always be rejected at the same significance level."

If a two-sided null hypothesis is rejected at a given significance level, the corresponding one-sided null hypothesis will also be rejected at the same significance level, because the two-sided test is more stringent.

Using the critical value rule, if a two-sided null hypothesis is rejected for a single mean at a given significance level, the corresponding one-sided null hypothesis will also be rejected at the same significance level.

This is because when performing a two-sided test, we are testing both ends of the distribution, thus it requires a stricter criteria to reject the null hypothesis than a one-sided test. Since we have already rejected it under a stricter evaluation, we will definitely reject it under a less strict one.

Consider an example where you are using a significance level of 5 percent (α = 0.05). Suppose that your computed t-statistic is 2.2. This value is greater than the critical value for a two-tailed test from the t29 distribution, which is 2.045. Therefore, you reject the two-sided null hypothesis.

Consequently, when comparing your t-statistic (2.2) with the critical value for a one-sided test (which will be less stringent than that for a two-tailed test), you also reject the one-sided null hypothesis.

https://brainly.com/question/34171008

#SPJ3

Answer:

8710 units

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1: Write all the data

Fixed cost: $9000

Average variable cost: 9.3 per unit

Total cost: 90,000

Total units: x

Step 2: Find the total variable cost

Average variable cost is per unit so it has to be multiplied by the number of units to find the total variable cost.

Total variable cost = average variable cost per unit x number of units

Total variable cost = 9.3x

Step 3: Make the formula for finding x

Total cost = total fixed cost + total variable cost

90,000 = 9000 + 9.3x

81000 = 9.3x

x = 8709.67

Rounded off to 8710 units

!!

Answer:[tex]\frac{22}{3}[/tex],[tex]2\dot \sqrt{\frac{11}{3}}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

rectangle with its base on x-axis

and other two corners at parabola

and parabola is downward facing symmetric about y-axis

let y be the y co-ordinate of the corner thus x co-ordinate is given by

[tex]x=\pm \sqrt{11-y}[/tex]

Thus lengths of rectangle is [tex]2\sqrt{11-y}[/tex] & y

Area [tex]=y\times 2\sqrt{11-y}[/tex]

differentiating w.r.t to y for maximum area

[tex]\frac{\mathrm{d} A}{\mathrm{d} y}=2\times \sqrt{11-y}-\frac{y}{2\dot \sqrt{11-y}}=0[/tex]

we get y=[tex]\frac{22}{3}[/tex]

and [tex]x=\pm \sqrt{\frac{11}{3}}[/tex]

A_{max}=16.21 units

Answer:

Dryer will pay for itself in 63 months or 5 years and 3 months.

Step-by-step explanation:

Let after x months new dryer will pay for itself.

Old dryer is costing $25 to operate so after x months it will cost = 25x

Similarly new dryer which cost $630 and operating cost is $15 per month.

So after x months new drier will cost = $(630 + 15x)

If the new dryer pay for itself in x months then total cost of both the dryers after x months should be same.

Therefore, 25x = 630 + 15x

25x - 15x = 630

10x = 630

x = [tex]\frac{630}{10}[/tex]

x = 63 months

Or x = 5 years 3 months

Answer is 63 months or 5 years 3 months.

Answer:

Explained

Step-by-step explanation:

Simulation is nothing but an approximate or somewhat accurate imitation of a real world situation. Simulation is actually a computer generated graphics to predict how a system will behave under given set of parameters, without actually applying real resources. Simulation finds a variety of application in various fields.  Simulation of blood flowing through veins and arteries. Simulation of LBW decisions in a cricket match, which helps Umpires to make correct LBW decisions in a match. A lot of recondite  process can understood using Simulation videos that is why concept of smart learning as been introduced.

Answer:

The amount after 8 years is $19249.17

Step-by-step explanation:

For any calculation for investments there si the compound interest formula:

[tex]A=P(1+\frac{r}{n} )^(n*t)[/tex]

Where

P = principal amount (the initial amount you borrow or deposit)

r  = annual rate of interest (as a decimal)

t  = number of years the amount is deposited or borrowed for.

A = amount of money accumulated after n years, including interest.

n  =  number of times the interest is compounded per year  

So for this example

P, the original amount ($14000)

r, 4%

t, 8 years

A, the amount after 8 years

n, 4, due that is quarterly

[tex]P=$14000(1+((4/100)/(4)))^(4*8)\\\\P= $19249.17[/tex]

Answer with explanation:

The given statement is which we have to prove by the principal of Mathematical Induction

    [tex]2^{n}>n[/tex]

1.→For, n=1

L H S =2

R H S=1

2>1

L H S> R H S

So,the Statement is true for , n=1.

2.⇒Let the statement is true for, n=k.

      [tex]2^{k}>k[/tex]

                   ---------------------------------------(1)

3⇒Now, we will prove that the mathematical statement  is true for, n=k+1.

     [tex]\rightarrow 2^{k+1}>k+1\\\\L H S=\rightarrow 2^{k+1}=2^{k}\times 2\\\\\text{Using 1}\\\\2^{k}>k\\\\\text{Multiplying both sides by 2}\\\\2^{k+1}>2k\\\\As, 2 k=k+k,\text{Which will be always greater than }k+1.\\\\\rightarrow 2 k>k+1\\\\\rightarrow2^{k+1}>k+1[/tex]

Hence it is true for, n=k+1.

So,we have proved the statement with the help of mathematical Induction, which is

      [tex]2^{k}>k[/tex]

Answer:

hence rate interest r = 41.176%

Step-by-step explanation:

The amount borrowed= $680

amount payed back = $750

therefore, interest incurred = 750-680= $70

time, t= 3 months = 3/12= 0.25 years

rate%, r

we know that SI= [tex]\frac{PRT}{100}[/tex]

70= [tex]\frac{680\timesr\0.25}{100}[/tex]

r=[tex]\frac{7000}{0.25\times680} = 41.176[/tex]

hence rate interest r = 41.176%

m - my age

s - son's age

[tex]s-6=\dfrac{m-6}{3}\\s+6=\dfrac{m+6}{2}\\\\3s-18=m-6\\2s+12=m+6\\\\m=3s-12\\m=2s+6\\\\3s-12=2s+6\\s=18[/tex]

He's 18

Answer:

The full budget has a total value of $160,000

Step-by-step explanation:

This is a simple ratio problem and can be solved using the Rule of Three property. The Rule of Three is used to compare two ratios and find the missing part. In this case the ratios would be the following.

[tex]\frac{64,000}{40 percent} = \frac{x}{100 percent}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{64,000 * 100 percent}{40 percent} = \frac{x}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{6,400,000}{40 percent} = \frac{x}[/tex]

[tex]160,000= \frac{x}[/tex]

So now we know that 100% (The full budget) has a total value of $160,000.

I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.

Answer:

30

Step-by-step explanation:

Follow the correct order of operations.

There are only multiplications and divisions, so do them in the order they appear from left to right.

625 ÷ 62.5 × 30 ÷ 10 =

= 10 × 30 ÷ 10

= 300 ÷ 10

= 30

Answer:

$2000 a year.

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's find the answer by using the following formula:

taxes=(house assessment)*(tax rate) for the initial conditions we have:

(1600/year)=(64000)*(tax rate)

(1600/year)/(64000)=(tax rate)

tax rate=0.025/year

For the current conditions we have:

taxes=(house assessment)*(tax rate)

taxes=(80000)*(0.025/year)

taxes=2000/year

So, the taxes will be $2000 a year.