Answer:
Citizens contribute to meeting society's needs.
Explanation:
Taxes are a necessity in American society. This is because tax money is used for several different essential services. This includes funding public schools (grades K-12), helping to build and repair infrastructure, paying the salaries of politicians, and paying the salaries of services like firemen and police officers. Taxes play a critical part in ensuring the safety of our society and that the most basic needs of our citizens are met.
The correct option is (B). Citizens are contributing to meeting society’s needs.
The government collects taxes for meeting society’s needs.
Further Explanation:
Taxes:
Taxes are collected from the public by the government to spend it on the welfare of society’s needs.
Justification for the correct and incorrect option:
A.
Ensure that there is sufficient money to fund private businesses: This option is incorrect.
The main motive of the government to collect tax is to fund the needs of the public, not only the private.
B.
Citizens contributing to meeting society’s needs: This option is correct.
The tax is collected by the government to meet the needs of society.
C.
Politicians get paid in a timely manner: This option is incorrect.
The purpose of tax collection is to fund the needs of the society not to pay the politicians.
D.
A government program exists for every need that arises: This option is incorrect.
The purpose of tax collection is to fund the needs of the society, or for the welfare of the society, not specifically for the government programs only.
Therefore, the government collects taxes for the welfare of society’s needs.
Learn More:
1. Change in value of investment
https://brainly.com/question/5959656
2.Wealth gap
https://brainly.com/question/2987205
3.Credit card
https://brainly.com/question/3211811
Answer Details:
Grade: High school
Chapter: Taxes
Subject: Business studies
Keywords:
Governments collect taxes to ensure that there is sufficient money to fund private businesses, citizens contribute to meeting society's needs, and politicians get paid in a timely manner, a government program exists for every need that arises, society’s welfare.
What can be said about voters today more than voters in the past?
A.They vote for candudates across both parties
B. They more conservative
C. They are more liberal
D. They generally vote for the democratic candidates
Answer:
D. They generally vote for the democratic candidates
Explanation:
American public opinion has undergone a profound change in recent decades. Changes in the educational level, in the geographic distribution and in the ethnic composition of the population are altering the bases of support of the two major political parties. The effects of a process that continues to this day.
Which event in 2011 was cause for celebration in the united states?
Answer: death of Osama Bin Laden.
Explanation:
The event that was the cause of Celebration in 2011 was the death of Osama Bin Laden, at the hands of the US forces. The Afghan terrorist leader of the Al Qaeda network was finally killed. This event brought together thousands of people, most of them victims of the 2001 attack on the Twin Towers.
The crowd gathered at ground zero, where security measures were taken for precautionary reasons, in order to avoid a possible attack again.
Answer:
B.) Al-Qaeda leader Osama Bid Laden was killed after a 10-year pursuit
Explanation:
Got it right on Edge
Plz Help I didn't understand these
How did advancements during the Gupta period transform mathematics?
A. They invented algebra.
B. They created the concepts of square numbers and square roots.
C. They developed a decimal system with a numeral for zero.
D. They made progress in metallurgy.
Under whose reign did the Gupta empire reach its greatest size?
A. Chandragupta Maurya
B. Chandra Gupta I
C. Samudra Gupta
D. Chandra Gupta II
Which game was invented in India?
A. solitaire
B. mahjongg
C. chess
D. checkers
Question 1: They developed a decimal system with a numeral for zero.
An important development in mathematics during this period was the decimal system notation. The powers of ten with null coefficients were used in order to indicate "zero."
Question 2: Chandragupta II
Chandragupta II was one of the most powerful emperor of the Gupta Empire. Under his rule (c. 380-c. 415) the Gupta Empire reached its greatest size. He was a great supporter of the arts and his rule is often referred to as the “Golden Age” of India.
Question 3: Chess
Chess is believed to have originated in India during the Gupta Empire in the 6th century. Afterwards, it spread through the Silk Road.
Advancements in Gupta mathematics include the development of a decimal system with zero (C), and the Gupta Empire reached its greatest size under Samudragupta (C). Chess (C) was the game invented in India.
Advancements in Gupta Period Mathematics
During the Gupta period, mathematics in India underwent a significant transformation. The mathematicians of this era developed a decimal system with a numeral for zero, which was critical for advancing mathematical calculation. The correct answer to how advancements during the Gupta period transformed mathematics is C. They developed a decimal system with a numeral for zero. They also calculated the value of pi with high precision and recognized the importance of negative numbers. Their work was foundational for future developments in mathematics across the world.
The Greatest Extent of the Gupta Empire
The Gupta Empire reached its zenith in terms of size and power under the reign of Samudra Gupta. Thus, the answer to the question under whose reign did the Gupta empire reach its greatest size is C. Samudragupta. After his reign, the empire enjoyed a period of stability and prosperity before eventually declining.
Origin of Chess
The game of chess has its origins in India, and it is widely acknowledged that it was invented there. Therefore, the game invented in India is C. chess. Chess is just one example of the cultural legacy of India that has spread throughout the world.
How did george whitefield help shape the great awakening
For telling the truth
From what you have learned about the U.S. reaction to the Irish diaspora, what similar effects do you think Australia and Canada faced between 1841 and 1850? Do you think that there were any differences in how these countries reacted? If so, why? If not, why not? Your answer should be at least 150 words in length
From 1841-1850, 1.3 million people moved overseas, the greatest part around 70% went to the USA, the rest of them shipped to Australia and only 2% to Canada. A lot of people died because of different diseases during the trip and the conditions were terrible. In the USA, quarantine centers were established for arriving ships, where sick emigrants recovered. The emigration continued until the First World War. Canada and Australia reacted in a different way, because the amount of emigrants was much lower, the greatest part of emigrants decided to move to the USA. Emigrants had the poorest jobs and bad conditions for life in the USA.
What Supreme Court decision upheld segregation laws in the United States? A. Parks v. Birmingham
B. Plessy v. Ferguson
C. Brown v. Board of Education
D. Roe v. Wade
Answer:
The answer is: B. Plessy v. Ferguson
How did the 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments strength the republican party in the south?
Answer:
Amendments were affixed to specific Republican Party stand for particular forthcoming Administrative elections.
Explanation:
The 13th, 14th, and 15th Acts acknowledged collectively as the Civil War Acts were planned to guarantee equity for lately liberated laborers. The 13th Act forbade slaveholding and all customary servitude, lacking in the case of a trial for a violation.Early legislators and legal authors including Thomas Paine, Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson also held limitations concerning slaveholding because of their dedication to just rights.
Students should be concerned about all of the following statements when they see ads, receive letters, or get phone calls about scholarships except:
A."We are a free scholarship site."
B."We'll do all of the work."
C."A credit card is needed to hold this scholarship."
D."You have been selected by a national foundation."
A) "We are a free scholarship site" (!APEX!)
Answer:
"WE ARE A FREE SCHOLARSHIP SITE"
Explanation:
apex
A major weakness of the Articles of Confederation was that the Congress
a. was unable to raise armies.
b. had no power to impose taxes.
c. did not have authority to sign treaties.
d. could not declare war.
Option B, had no power to impose taxes is the right answer.
The colonies of the United States did not want to have a strong centralized government, because they did not want the government to become a tyranny. Hence, they did not even provide the national government with some very significant powers such as the power of issuing money, imposing taxes, enforcing laws etc.
The leaders of the colonies thought that the power accession would lead to the recolonization of the newly freed American territories. Hence, the Articles of Confederation did not provide the national government with sufficient authority to implement their laws. And this became a major weakness of the national government made under the articles of confederation.
Which action could accomplish all of the goals of the French Revolution?
eliminating absolute authority
writing a constitution
ending the class system
passing a fairer tax system
The correct answer is B) writing a Constitution.
The action that accomplished all the goals of the French Revolution is the writing of a Constitution.
Since the beginning of the movement, French people wanted to eliminate the absolute power of the monarchy and the influence of the Nobles. French people lived in poverty and suffered so much for lacking the basics. They wanted better laws and the creation of a Constitution would allow that to happen and overturn the injustice lived until that moment. So it is true that the action that accomplished all the goals of the French Revolution is the writing of a Constitution.
Were the effects of the war of 1812 mostly positive or mostly negative for the United States
There were a little bit of both but in my opinion mostly positive
Written during the vietnam war, the revealed the federal government did not think the war could ever be won despite telling the public a different story for years.
Answer: THE PENTAGON PAPERS
Daniel Ellsberg was the military analyst who leaked "The Pentagon Papers" to the American press in 1971, revealing top secret information about US planning and decision-making in regard to the Vietnam War.
The Vietnam War had a major impact in shifting public opinion toward distrust of government. During the Vietnam War, a major credibility gap became apparent in regard to what the government was telling the American public vs. what was actually taking place. The term "credibility gap" was used by journalists who questioned the optimistic picture that the Lyndon Johnson administration painted regarding how the war was going, when investigative reporting showed a much more negative reality.
The credibility gap grew especially apparent when the Pentagon Papers (classified documents) were leaked to the press in 1971, showing that the government indeed had been deceiving the public about the plans and conduct of the war over the years.
Answer:
He is right, The Pentagon Papers is the right answer on Odyssey!!
In at least 150 words, make an argument for or against the ability of citizen movements to bring about changes in government policy.
HELPPPP PLEASE HURRY
In most discussions, the global citizens movement is a socio-political process rather than a political organization or party structure. The term is often used synonymously with the anti-globalization movement or the global justice movement.
Citizen movements can make a big difference in bringing about changes in government policy. When citizens organize, it sends a message to political leaders which indicates what it is that the people support. Moreover, by seeing that people are getting organized, more citizens would be motivated to participate, or at least to get interested in the topic. Finally, citizen movements usually receive a lot of media attention, which can help turn a small movement into an international phenomenon. An example of a citizen movement that brought about changes in government policy is the civil rights movement.
what was north korea fighting for in the korean war?
Answer:
It turned into an impoverished tyranny.
Explanation:
North Korea became a poor country ruled by a series of dictators.
What argument does jones make regarding suffrage and the paying of taxes
Mrs. Gilbert E. Jones says in the document called: A Woman Assails Women’s Suffrage (of 1910), that she does agree that taxation without representation is tyranny. But this is not to be misunderstood, therefore the meaning behind the phrase, according to her, should be as clear as possible.
In Jones opinion, this phrase was used to talk about how some woman pay taxes yet are not represented.
In her own words "If this is true without any qualification, it must be true not only of women, but of everybody".
Jones argues that there is an intrinsic link between suffrage (the right to vote) and the paying of taxes. This premise is founded on the principle of 'no taxation without representation,' suggesting that those who contribute to a nation's treasury through taxes should correspondingly have a say in how the nation is governed. Therefore, if a person pays taxes, Jones believes they should be granted the right to vote.
The argument Jones makes draws from a foundational democratic principle that dates back to the political controversies leading up to the American Revolution. It posits that a direct correlation exists between the act of paying taxes and the entitlement to participate in the democratic process. Taxation is viewed as a civic duty and an investment in the state's operations and infrastructure, which justifies a stakeholder's right to influence governmental decisions through voting. Jones's stance is a classic representation of the call for suffrage expansions throughout history, especially for those who have been excluded from this civil right despite their economic contributions to society.
How did colonists begin smuggling goods into and our of the colonies
In 1764 Parliament passed the Sugar Act, which set duties on molasses and sugar imported by colonists. This was the first act passed specifically to raise money in the colonies. British officials also tried harder to arrest smugglers. ... The British navy also began to stop and search ships for smuggled goods.
Why was Roe v. Wade a controversial case?
Answer:
Roe v. Wade is the name of the case of 1973, by which the Supreme Court of the United States decriminalized - by a divided decision of 7 against 2 - induced abortion in that country.
In 1970, newly graduated lawyers from the University of Texas Law School, Linda Coffee and Sarah Weddington, filed a lawsuit in Texas representing Norma L. McCorvey ("Jane Roe"). McCorvey maintained that her pregnancy had been the product of an abuse. The District Attorney for Dallas County, Texas, Henry Wade, represented the State of Texas, which opposed abortion. The District Court ruled in favor of Jane Roe, but refused to establish a restriction against abortion laws.
The case was appealed on repeated occasions until it finally reached the Supreme Court of Justice of the United States, which finally decided in 1973 that women, protected by the right to privacy - under the "due process clause" of the Fourteenth Amendment - could choose whether or not to continue with the pregnancy; that right to privacy was considered a fundamental right under the protection of the US Constitution and therefore could not be legislated against by any state.
"Jane Roe" gave birth to her daughter while the case had not yet been decided. The baby was given up for adoption. Roe v. Wade was finally decided by the Supreme Court of the United States, leading to a landmark decision on abortion. According to this decision, most anti-abortion laws in the United States violated the constitutional right to privacy under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution. The decision forced to modify all federal and state laws that proscribed or restricted abortion and that were contrary to the new decision.
This decision of the Court was interpreted as the decriminalization of abortion for the 50 states of the Union.
In 1995 Norma McCorvey regretted her actions and acknowledged that part of her testimony at the trial was not true. McCorvey alleges that she became a "pawn" for two ambitious young lawyers who were looking for a plaintiff who could change the legislation that prohibited abortion in the State of Texas. Sarah Weddington, the lawyer who litigated Roe v. Wade in the Supreme Court, explained in a speech at the Institute of Educational Ethics in Oklahoma, why she used the false charges of sexual abuse, up to the Supreme Court: "My conduct may not have been totally ethical. But I did it because of what I thought were good reasons". In 2005, she asked the Supreme Court to review the 1973 ruling, arguing that the case should be seen again due to new evidence of the harm that the procedure causes to the victims, but the request was denied.
Roe v. Wade was a controversial case due to its legalization of abortion and the deeply divisive nature of the issue, sparking debates over moral, religious, and constitutional grounds, while ongoing legal challenges and societal impact further fueled the controversy.
Why was Roe v. Wade a controversial case?Roe v. Wade was a controversial case for several reasons, primarily due to the highly sensitive and divisive nature of the issue it addressed. The case, decided by the United States Supreme Court in 1973, established the legal right to abortion.
1. Abortion and Reproductive Rights: The central issue of Roe v. Wade was the right to abortion. The case involved a woman, known by the pseudonym "Jane Roe," who challenged a Texas law that criminalized abortion except to save the life of the mother. The Supreme Court's decision legalized abortion across the United States, striking down many state-level restrictions on abortion.
2. Moral and Religious Beliefs: Abortion is a deeply contentious moral and religious issue. The case pitted pro-choice advocates, who argued for a woman's right to make decisions about her own body, against pro-life advocates, who viewed abortion as the taking of an innocent human life and believed it should be restricted or banned.
3. Judicial Activism vs. Judicial Restraint: Critics of the decision, including some legal scholars, argued that the Supreme Court overstepped its authority by legislating from the bench rather than interpreting the Constitution narrowly. They accused the Court of judicial activism, claiming that the right to abortion was not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution and, therefore, should have been left to the states to decide.
4. Lack of Consensus: The Court's decision in Roe v. Wade was not unanimous, with a 7-2 vote in favor of legalizing abortion. This lack of consensus added to the controversy surrounding the ruling and fueled ongoing debates about its legitimacy.
5. Ongoing Legal Challenges: Since the Roe v. Wade decision, there have been numerous legal challenges and attempts to overturn or restrict abortion rights at the federal and state levels. This has kept the controversy alive and made abortion a significant political issue for decades.
6. Societal Impact: The ruling had a profound impact on society, influencing public opinion, political discourse, and activism on both sides of the issue. It has been a rallying point for political campaigns and remains a contentious topic in national and state-level elections.
Overall, the contentious nature of the abortion debate, combined with the Supreme Court's decision to legalize abortion on a national scale, has made Roe v. Wade one of the most controversial and polarizing cases in modern American legal history. The case continues to shape the abortion debate and remains a significant factor in discussions about individual rights, government authority, and the role of the judiciary.
Learn more on Roe v. Wade here;
https://brainly.com/question/26994127
#SPJ6
What event that was caused by economic issues came directly before the constitutional convection?
A. Shays’ Rebellion
B. Second Continental Congress
C. Annapolis Convection
D. publication of the Federalist Papers
Please help! :)
A. Shays’ Rebellion, it was caused by farmers who couldn't pay for their farms.
Final answer:
Shays' Rebellion was the event caused by economic issues that directly preceded the Constitutional Convention. It highlighted the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation, prompting leaders to draft a new Constitution.
Explanation:
The event that came directly before the Constitutional Convention, caused by economic issues, was Shays' Rebellion. This uprising involved desperate debtors in western Massachusetts, led by Daniel Shays, who faced high taxes, crushing debt, and the threat of property foreclosures. Their grievances, including the inability of the national government under the Articles of Confederation to manage finances or effectively enforce laws, raised concerns among leaders, which spurred the convening of the Constitutional Convention to create a more stable government framework in Philadelphia.
The alarm over Shays' Rebellion demonstrated to political leaders like George Washington, James Madison, and Alexander Hamilton that there was a pressing need to reevaluate and strengthen the Articles of Confederation. This led to the organization of the Constitutional Convention where the United States Constitution was ultimately drafted, moving beyond mere amendments to the Articles and focusing on establishing a new, strong federal government.
Therefore, the correct answer to the question is A. Shays' Rebellion.
Question 8 Unsaved
In Washington’s Farewell Address, he urged the nation to
Question 8 options:
avoid creating strong political bonds with foreign countries
avoid forming political parties
build trading relationships with other countries
All of these
Death is a dignitary who when he comes announced is to be received with formal manifestations of respect, even by those most familiar with him. In the code of military etiquette silence and fixity are forms of deference.
What is the meaning of the word deference as used in the last sentence of paragraph two?
A) courteous word or deed of esteem or regard
B) willingness to consider the feelings of others
C) respectful submission to the wishes of another
D) sign of respect or courtesy for another's position
Your answer would be D a sign of respect or courtesy for another's position is correct clearly the soldiers and officers surrounding the man with the rope around his neck are showing respect for him and what is about time happen. If they were willing to consider his feelings or submit to his wishes, they would probably take the ripe off his neck, and no words have been spoken by anyone in the passage.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
A sign of respect or courtesy for another's position is correct. Clearly, the soldiers and officers surrounding the man with the rope around his neck are showing respect for him and what is about to happen. If they were willing to consider his feelings or submit to his wishes, they would probably take the rope off his neck, and no words have been spoken by anyone in the passage.
How can an historian acknowledge personal bias yet stay true to the historic method?
A) An historian may keep asking more questions, keep searching other sources, and keep writing.
B) New evidence through primary sources may make information clearer.
C) The historian may acknowledge their perspectives on the study and use other narratives.
D) Readers must acknowledge their own biases of history as they read as well.
C) The historian may acknowledge their perspectives on the study and use other narratives.
The correct answer is A) An historian may keep asking more questions, keep searching other sources, and keep writing.
A historian can acknowledge personal bias yet stay true to the historic method by asking more questions, keep searching other sources, and keep writing.
The historian knows that he has to maintain its objectivity all the time when doing research. If by any motive it shows bias, it is b¿very important that can differentiate its bias and opinion with facts. It has to be very clear for the reader to know the difference from facts, hard data, from the bias of the author. This way, the historian can add up to its work with more sources, facts, statistics, secondary resources and keep on writing its conclusions.
Which type of body language should Callie use to show that she is an attentive listener?
Is there more to the question, if not she should keep eye contact, nod her head to show understandment, and stay focused. Hope this helps :)
Answer:
The best answer to this question, whose second part can be found on this very platform as well, would be: Which type of body language should callie use to show that she is an attentive listener, would be: She should make eye contact with the speaker.
Explanation:
Body language when communication is taking place, is vital. When appropriate body languge is not assumed, then communication will be ineffective, and useless. Furthermore, inappropriate body language, even if the verbal message being delivered is positive, can cause serious misunderstandings and trouble. In the case of Callie, in order for her to avoid this issue, and show the person who is talking to her that she is, in fact, attentively listening, she must show the person that she is listening, that she cares about what is being said, and that she is understanding the message. To do that, her body becomes a vital part of communication, and looking at the speaker in the eyes shows that she is, at least, paying attention to the person who is speaking.
a land mass surrounded by water on three sides
that is a peninsula.
an example would florida, usa.
hope it helps
Which new england colony had a govner who was not appointed by the king of england?
Massachusetts colony.
Which of the following resulted in the end of the vietnam war? PLEASE HELP WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST
Answer:
The fall of Saigon
Explanation:
I just got 100% on quiz
Gradpoint
5.0 ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Early in 1975, Communist forces put an end to the conflict by gaining power in South Vietnam. The Paris Peace Accords, a treaty, put an end to the Vietnam War.
What is Vietnam War?
During the ancient period of time, the Vietnam War was a very famous war. The Vietnam War started on November 1, 1955, and ended on April 30, 1975. The Vietnam War was between North Vietnam and South Vietnam. The Vietnam War lost many soldiers. The main causes of the war to spread communism to the citizen.
On 30 April 1975, the Vietnam War came to an end. When American forces left the conflict, the war was over. The longest conflict in history was the Vietnam War. Vietnam's Socialist Republic was the place. Two years later, Communist forces had unified Vietnam.
Hence, the significance of the Vietnam War is aforementioned.
Learn more about on Vietnam War, here:
https://brainly.com/question/11375126
#SPJ5
2. How did fighting the American revolution impact the American view of central government?
A) They remained suspicious of a strong central government.
B) They sought advice from the British about parliamentary government and the rules of common law.
C) They approved of the way the Congress handle emergencies.
D) They we’re excited by the prospect of a strong new federal authority.
B) They sought advice from the British about parliamentary government and the rules of common law.
Which of the following was a weakness of the Colonial Army during the American Revolution?
Question 9 options:
Knowing the geography and terrain of the area they are fighting on.
Having a reason and will to fight for something they believed in.
Not having the money to pay for war supplies and soldiers.
Having a common goal of protecting their families, homes, and cities.
thanks
Not having the money to pay for war supplies and soldiers.
Answer:
Not having the money to pay for war supplies and soldiers.
Explanation:
This was one of the weaknesses of the Colonial Army during the American Revolution. The Colonial Army had several advantages during the war. They shared a common goal and a will to fight for something that they believed in. They also wanted to protect their families, homes and cities, and they possessed better knowledge of the terrain they were fighting on. However, one thing they did not have was adequate money to pay for the expenses of war.
How does the checks and balances system keep the necessary and proper clause from being abused by a strong central government?
The system of checks and balances ensures that the federal government does not abuse the necessary and proper clause through the use of the judicial branch.
The judicial branch (aka Supreme Court) has the ability to rule federal laws/acts constitutional or unconstitutional. In other words, if Congress tries to overstep their boundaries in terms of what actions they can take, the Supreme Court can rule their actions unconstitutional. This ruling would prevent Congress from acting, as all US citizens regardless of political power must follow the ruling of the Supreme Court.
What was the most fundamental difference between the Truman Doctrine and the Eisenhower Doctrine?
Answer: The Eisenhower Doctrine promised military support as well as economic aid to countries fighting communism. The Truman Doctrine had focused on economic aid.
Detail:
The Truman Doctrine was first stated by President Truman to Congress in 1947, and was mostly about providing economic aid. Truman stated: "It must be the policy of the United States to support free people who are resisting attempted subjugation by armed minorities or by outside pressures." Essentially, the Truman Doctrine pledged American aid elsewhere in the world to check the spread of communist and Soviet influence. The policy was first put into action in 1948 by providing economic support to Greece and Turkey to stave off communist movement in those countries.
The Eisenhower Doctrine was proclaimed by President Eisenhower in 1957. Eisenhower pledged to provide economic or also military aid, as needed, to any Middle Eastern country needing help in resisting communist aggression. This was in response to Soviet and other communist support to Egypt, and as a warning to the USSR in regard to the Suez Crisis of 1956.
Is the statement true or false? cuneiform was not a complicated writing system, and many sumerians could write
The given statement "Cuneiform was not a complicated writing system, and many Sumerians could write" can be marked as false, because Cuneiform was the writing system and 90 percent of the sumerians could not read and write.
What was Cuneiform? Who were Sumerians?Cuneiform was a system of writing that was used used in the ancient Middle East. It was the writing system used around 3400 BC. It was the logo-syllabic script that was in use from the early Bronze Age until the beginning of the Common Era.
The Sumerians were the people of southern Mesopotamia. Sumer was an ancient civilization founded in the Mesopotamia. The Sumerians were known for their innovations in language, governance, architecture and many more.
Basically, In Mesopotamia 90 percent of the people had no knowledge of how to read and write.
Learn more about Cuneiform here:-
https://brainly.com/question/13301257
#SPJ2