Help please history question

The Plessy v. Ferguson ruling affirmed the doctrine of "separate but equal," legally sanctioning segregation and reinforcing institutional racism until it was overturned by the Brown v. Board of Education decision in 1954.

The Supreme Court case Plessy v. Ferguson ushered in a new era of segregation in the United States by legally sanctioning the practice under the doctrine of "separate but equal." This ruling, delivered in 1896, affirmed the constitutionality of racial segregation laws for public facilities as long as the segregated facilities were equal in quality—a condition that was rarely if ever met. As a result, de jure segregation became widespread, especially in southern states, affecting all aspects of life, from education to public accommodations, and perpetuated a system of racial inequality and discrimination.

The "separate but equal" doctrine established by Jim Crow laws reinforced systemic racism and legally enforced inferior services and facilities for African Americans. This segregation extended to schools, movie theaters, train cars, and more, with facilities for African Americans almost always being of lower quality. It was not until the Brown v. Board of Education Supreme Court decision in 1954 that the doctrine of "separate but equal" was finally overturned, declaring that separate educational facilities are inherently unequal, thus marking the beginning of the end of official segregation in the United States.

Answer:

It caused Mexico to lose territory but gain new violence between conservatives and liberals.

Explanation:

Final answer:

Vasco da Gama was the first European explorer to reach India by sailing around Africa, opening up new routes and leading to future expeditions and colonization.

Explanation:

Vasco da Gama was the first European explorer to successfully reach India by sailing around Africa. Before any other European explorer, da Gama sailed past the Cape of Good Hope in 1497 and reached Calicut, India in 1498. His success opened up new routes and led to future expeditions and the establishment of Portuguese colonies and trading posts in Africa and India.

Answer:

Ralph Nader and the Green party earn votes, but it all comes down to Florida.

The election was so tight that it took a 36-day legal battle and a controversial 5-4 Supreme Court ruling before Al Gore conceded, although he won the national popular vote by more than a half-million votes.

The race not only centered on the candidates from the Democratic and Republican parties, Al Gore and George W. Bush, but on third-time presidential candidate Ralph Nader. An American lawyer, political activist and consumer advocate Nader was Green Party candidate.

Nader hoped to earn 5 percent of the popular vote, which would have given his party access to federal matching funds in the following presidential election. Nader fell short of his goal, receiving 2.9 million votes and less than 3 percent of the popular vote. However, some believe Nader’s third-party candidacy siphoned enough votes from the Democratic nominee, Vice President Al Gore, to swing the victory to Republican George W. Bush.

The difference was Florida, which Bush won by fewer than 600 votes to give him a 271-to-266 Electoral College edge. Had even a small percentage of the nearly 100,000 votes garnered by Nader in Florida shifted to Gore, the Democratic candidate would have won the election. In addition, the 22,000 votes won by Nader in New Hampshire were three times the size of Bush’s margin of victory in that state. If New Hampshire had flipped to Gore, that too would have given him the victory.

Explanation:

Answer:

Committee members are elected or chosen by the state convention. They might also be chosen at the primary level, depending on the state. The committee’s chairperson is chosen by the presidential candidate. The national committee oversees the party’s national operation at its headquarters in Washington, DC. The committee is responsible for organizing the party’s national convention and large campaign events.Explanation: what it should be on edg.

Answer:

The events in The Impeachment of President Bill Clinton presented in chronological order are:

-The House debates the charges and evidence

-The House accuses the President of perjury and obstruction of justice

-The House holds hearings on the charges.

-The House votes to impeach President Clinton on both charges.

-The Chief Justice presides over the Senate trial

-The Senate debates the charges and evidence

-The Senate acquits the President on both charges.

Explanation:

The impeachment of Bill Clinton was initiated on October 8, 1998, when the US House of Representatives voted to commenc impeachment proceedings against Bill Clinton, for lying under oath and perjury.

The charges were a result of a lawsuit filed against Clinton by Paula Jones and from Clinton's testimony denying that he had engaged in an improper relationship with intern Monica Lewinsky.

On October 8, the House authorized a wide-ranging impeachment inquiry and on December 19, after nearly 14 hours of debate, the House approved two articles of impeachment, charging President Clinton with lying under oath to a federal grand jury and obstructing justice.

Five weeks later, on February 12, the Senate voted on whether to remove Clinton from office. Clinton was acquitted on both articles of impeachment.

The events in correct order of the Impeachment of President Bill Clinton are:

President Bill Clinton was known to be acquitted on the articles of impeachment

On February 12, 1999.

The impeachment trial took a while 5 weeks before it ended. The Senate voted to acquit the president on perjury and obstruction of justice.

Conclusively, The event stared with Clinton affair with Monica Lewinsky, a 21-year-old unpaid intern.

Learn more from

https://brainly.com/question/23317466

Answer:

The correct answer is C) To create more free states so they could control Congress.

explanation:

Northerners wanted to control Congress because Congress is the branch of government that makes laws for the US. In this case, having more power in Congress would allow Northerners to make laws that would benefit them.

On the other hand, Southerners were fearful that if the North gained more political power in Congress that they would try to outlaw the institution of slavery. After much heated debate, Congress developed the Kansas-Nebraska Act. This allowed citizens of Kansas and Nebraska to vote on whether or not they would allow the institution of slavery in their state.

Answer:

To create more free states so that they could control congress

Explanation:

Answer:

The Supreme Court is the nation's highest court and handles final appeals

Explanation:

The Supreme Court of the United States is the highest court in the American judicial system, and has the power to decide appeals on all cases brought in federal court or those brought in state court but dealing with federal law.

The Supreme Court is the highest court in the United States and handles final appeals.

The Supreme Court is indeed the highest court in the United States, representing the judicial branch of the federal government. Its primary function is to hear cases that have been appealed from lower courts, including the final appeals. Therefore, the statement is true.

https://brainly.com/question/32059914

#SPJ12

Answer:

The Self-Made Myth exposes the false claim that business success is the result of heroic individual effort with little or no outside help. Brian Miller and Mike Lapham bust the myth and present profiles of business leaders who recognize the public investments and supports that made their success possible—including Warren Buffett, Ben Cohen of Ben and Jerry’s, New Belgium Brewing CEO Kim Jordan, and others. The book also thoroughly demolishes the claims of supposedly self-made individuals such as Donald Trump and Ross Perot. How we view the creation of wealth and individual success is critical because it shapes our choices on taxes, regulation, public investments in schools and infrastructure, CEO pay, and more. It takes a village to raise a business—it’s time to recognize that fact.

This book challenges a central myth that underlies today’s antigovernment rhetoric: that an individual’s success is the result of gumption and hard work alone. Miller and Lapham clearly show that personal success is closely tied to the supports society provides.

Explanation:

it’s worth mentioning briefly an additional impact that the self-made myth has on our public debates—that of people voting their aspirations. Because the rags-to-riches myth persists, many Americans hold on to the belief, however unlikely, that they too may one day become wealthy. This has at times led to people’s voting their aspirations rather than their reality. As Michael Moore noted in 2003:

After fleecing the American public and destroying the American Dream for most working people, how is it that, instead of being drawn and quartered and hung at dawn at the city gates, the rich got a big wet kiss from Congress in the form of a record tax break, and no one says a word? How can that be? I think it’s because we’re still addicted to the Horatio Alger fantasy drug. Despite all the damage and all the evidence to the contrary, the average American still wants to hang on to this belief that maybe, just maybe, he or she (mostly he) just might make it big after all.35

It is essential that we find a more honest and complete narrative of wealth creation. In chapter 2, we expose the fallacy of the self-made myth by examining the stories of individuals often lifted up as successes in our public dialogues. In examining their stories, we come to better understand that even their business success includes contributions from society, from government, from other individuals, and even luck.

Beyond the moralizing ridiculed by Twain, this individual success myth overlooked a number of key social and environmental factors. The emergence of a clear geography of opportunity showed that there was something about the place where one lived that contributed to one’s success. No matter what personal qualities someone had, if you lived in Appalachia or the South, your chances of ascending the ladder to great wealth were slim. Those who achieved great wealth were almost invariably from the bustling industrial cities of the Northeast. By one estimate, three out of four millionaires in the nineteenth century were from New England, New York, or Pennsylvania.7

Another unique external factor was the opportunity that existed at that time, thanks to expanding frontiers and seemingly unlimited natural resources. The United States was conquering and expropriating land from native people and distributing it to railroads, White homesteaders, and land barons. Most of the major Gilded Age fortunes were tied to cornering a market and exploiting natural resources such as minerals, oil, and timber. Even P. T. Barnum, the celebrated purveyor of individual success aphorisms, had to admit in Art of Money Getting that “in the United States, where we have more land than people, it is not at all difficult for persons in good health to make money.”8

He might have added that it also helped to be male, to be free rather than a slave, and to be White. While free Blacks had some rights in the North, they had little opportunity to achieve the rags-to-riches dream because of both informal and legal discrimination. Even after the Civil War, Blacks, Asians, and others were largely excluded from governmental programs like the Homestead Act that distributed an astounding 10 percent of all US lands—270 million acres—to 1.6 million primarily White homesteaders.9

Answer:

Explanation:

Answer:

Creoles

Explanation:

Of the Europeans, Creoles made up a larger percentage.

Creoles is  any person of European (mostly French or Spanish) or African descent born in the West Indies or parts of French or Spanish America (and thus naturalized in those regions rather than in the parents' home country).

Creoles made up a larger percentage of the population in the Spanish colonies compared to peninsulares. Peninsulares were Spaniards born in Spain holding high positions, while creoles were Spanish descendants born in the colonies.

The term peninsular referred to Spaniards born in Spain who lived in the colonies of Spanish America and held high administrative and clerical positions. Creoles, on the other hand, were people of Spanish descent born in the colonies. They were often part of the landed elite and merchant class but were not appointed to the top colonial offices. Over time, the Creoles came to make up a larger percentage of the population in the Spanish colonies because they were born there and their numbers increased through natural growth. In contrast, peninsulares were fewer because they were often officials who traveled back and forth between Spain and the colonies.

https://brainly.com/question/24874123

#SPJ3

Answer:

Neutral

Explanation:

Answer:

neutral

Explanation:

i took the test

Answer:

Launched

Explanation:

Answer:

LaUnChEd I tHiNk HoPe ThIs HeLp OkIe ByE bYe

Explanation:

Answer:

civil rights act of 1964

Answer:

EDB WEQX HJEHJWBD2WEBD

Explanation:

ENB HQDBKD3KJBEDK

The Cuban Revolution was an armed revolt conducted by Fidel Castro's revolutionary 26th of July Movement and its allies against the military dictatorship of Cuban President Fulgencio Batista.

hope this helps!

(source- google history search)

Answer:

Cuban President Fulgencio Batista.

Explanation:

"The Cuban Revolution (Spanish: Revolución cubana) was an armed revolt conducted by Fidel Castro's revolutionary 26th of July Movement and its allies against the military dictatorship of Cuban President Fulgencio Batista."

Answer:

Robert E Lee

Explanation: Lee opposed Secession but was a loyal son of Virginia.

Answer:

false

Explanation:

Answer: through a series of newspaper articles

Explanation:

Answer:

C

Explanation:

Answer:

i think it was inflation or a surplus of food suppies

Explanation:

The following is accurate regarding the US-China relationship in the early 1970s. The alliance was strengthening and gave the United States more clout with the Soviet Union. Hence, choices (1) and (3) are correct.

The Soviet Union, officially the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, was a transcontinental nation that covered the majority of northern Eurasia from December 30, 1922, until December 26, 1991. It was a leading communist state that was ostensibly a federal union of fifteen national republics, but in reality, up until its closing years, both its administration and its economy were heavily centralized.

It was a one-party state run by the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, with Moscow as both its capital and that of its largest and most populous republic, the Russian SFSR. Other significant cities included Alma-Ata (Kazakh SSR), Tashkent (Uzbek SSR), Minsk (Byelorussian SSR), Kiev (Ukrainian SSR), Leningrad (Russian SFSR), Alma-Ata (Kazakh SSR), and Novosibirsk (Russian SFSR). It was the largest nation .

Learn more about Soviet Union, from:

brainly.com/question/10173240

#SPJ7

Answer:

Option:  A period of scientific achievement and artistic triumph where people believed that all problems and mysteries could be solved by the application of Reason.  

Explanation:

Enlightenment was an intellectual movement that controlled the ideas in Europe during the 18th century. Thinkers began an intellectual journey indicating the reason, skepticism, individualism, and science.  Enlightenment science greatly valued experimentation and rational thought with reasons and scientific experiments. Some of the famous scientific persons were Copernicus, Kepler, and Newton.      

Answer:

Option:  A period of scientific achievement and artistic triumph where people believed that all problems and mysteries could be solved by the application of Reason.  

Explanation:

Enlightenment was an intellectual movement that controlled the ideas in Europe during the 18th century. Thinkers began an intellectual journey indicating the reason, skepticism, individualism, and science.  Enlightenment science greatly valued experimentation and rational thought with reasons and scientific experiments. Some of the famous scientific persons were Copernicus, Kepler, and Newton.      

Answer:

The answer is D.

Explanation

I think. I try my best.

Answer:

1. adjustments to the canon of proportion

Explanation:

Adjustments to the canon of proportion is an example of the Late Classical period Greek art relaxation of conventions

Answer:

Independence from Spain came suddenly for most of Latin America. Between 1810 and 1825, most of Spain's former colonies had declared and won independence and had divided up into republics. ... Spain fought valiantly to hold on to its rich colonies.

Explanation:

Answer:

Maybe i can help u a lil' 1. The Western Front , a 400-plus mile stretch of land wearing through France and Belgium from the Swiss border to the North Sea, was the decisive front during the First World War.

2. Soldiers fought each other from trenches and armies traded huge losses of human life for pitifully small land gains. Life in trenches was miserable: lived in mud, rats, no fresh food, and lacked sleep.

3.- (srry i dont have any info bout this one)

4. 2 years later, he was introduced to Russian Czar Nicholas II and his wife Alexandra Feodorovna, who were seeking help for their sickly son, Alexis. Rasputin quickly gained their confidence by seemingly "curing" the boy of hemophilia.

Answer:

1. Through France and Belgium...from the Swiss border to the North Sea.

2. Soldiers fought against each other in trenches. Life in trenches was miserable and they often died from diseases.

9. Red

18. Politics, secret alliances, imperialism, and nationalistic pride

27. France, Russia, Germany, Austria-Hungary, Kingdom of Italy, Great Britain, and Italy

28. Russia, France, Great Britain, Germany, Austria-Hungary, Italy, and the United States.

33. y=Italy

z=France

x=Austria-Hungary

v=Germany

w=Russia

u=United Kingdom

Sorry, this is all I know. I hope it helped.

Answer:

yes

Explanation:  Michelangelo was widely recognized as a premier of his age. Like Leonardo DA Vinci he was a Renaissance Man knowledgeable in many different fields. A brilliant sculptor and painter as well as an architect and a poet, he was gifted not only in art but the science of art.

Answer:

The answers are Harsh weather, little acess to supplies, and drilling tunnels through rock.