The principle of using nuclear weapons to deter enemy nations from aggression is rooted in a Cold War-era policy called mutually assured destruction (MAD). The goal is to create a balance of terror wherein neither nation would risk a nuclear strike due to fear of equal or greater retaliation. Use of nuclear weapons today involves tremendous political, humanitarian and environmental concerns.
Explanation:The principle idea behind using nuclear weapons to dissuade enemy nations from taking over other countries is steeped in a Cold War-era defense policy known as mutually assured destruction (MAD). The rationale behind MAD is the creation of a state of significant nuclear deterrence, wherein an attack by one would lead to a retaliatory nuclear response from the other, causing immense and unacceptable losses to both. Therefore, nations would be dissuaded from initiating nuclear aggression because of the inevitable devastation the conflict would bring to them.
In the Cold War, both the United States and the Soviet Union built up immense stockpiles of nuclear arsenals that served as deterrents against each other. Their goal was to create a power equilibrium where neither of them would dare to strike first due to fear of retaliation that could lead to their annihilation. The notion of 'first strike' is contradicted by the policy of MAD.
However, it's crucial to recognize that the use of nuclear weapons to deter other countries is fraught with ethical, political and humanitarian concerns, including the risk of nuclear proliferation, accidental use, and devastating long-term environmental consequences. In the present world, diplomacy, economic sanctions, alliances, and conventional military capabilities tend to be preferred tools of influence and dissuasion.
Learn more about Nuclear Deterrence here:https://brainly.com/question/1338156
#SPJ2
There is no passage :-(
1) For what does Nixon take credit in this passage?
-living up to his most sacred commitment
-winning the Vietnam War
-being a wise leader
2) Which of the following best describes Nixon’s purpose with these last remarks?
-He is seeking forgiveness for his wrongdoing.
-He is denying his participation in illegal activities.
-He is trying to paint his presidency in a positive light.
Answer:
The answers are A for the first one and C for the second one.
Explanation:
First - living up to his most sacred commitment
Second - He is trying to paint his presidency in a positive light.
Nixon take credit in this passage by living up to his most sacred and Nixon’s purpose with these last remarks is that He is trying to paint his presidency in a positive light.
What did Nixon do in his presidency?Richard Milhous Nixon was known to be the 37th president of the United States.
He was said to have focused his government on détente with the People's Republic of China and the Soviet Union. He was known as the key element in lowering the Cold War tensions with both countries.
Learn more about Nixon from
https://brainly.com/question/951021
Insert your own news caption below describing how ethnic rivalries and alliances systems propelled the world into ww1
The World War I was a direct result of the ethnic rivalries, alliances, imperialist ambitions. The ethnic tensions have been present fro hundreds of years, but with the consolidation of some countries and gaining more power, the tensions were constantly growing. The alliances had a big role in the tensions, as the countries that had colonies allied in order to keep them, while the other countries that wanted to get some colonies allied in order to get them. All was leading to a war, and once there was a direct reason to justify it, the countries started attacking each other and created a lot of bloodshed.
Answer:
Assassination leads to war
Explanation:
Why was korea divided at the 38th parallel
Answer:
The answer is B
Explanation:
got it right on edge2021
Which goal stated in the Preamble to the U.S. Constitution requires a strong army? "secure the Blessings of Liberty" "promote the general Welfare" "insure domestic Tranquility" "provide for the common defense"
Answer:
"provide for the common defense”
Explanation: Gradpoint
The Preamble to the U.S. Constitution stated that it would provide for the common defense to make a strong army.
What is a constitution?The constitution is an entity that helps information about the government, which suggest the rules and regulation of how the nation should operate and how the government should protect the rights and duties of the people.
The Preamble of the Constitution states that it would provide a defense mechanism for its Nation and its citizen, which means that it is to provide protection against any conflict within the country or outside.
Also, the rights and lives of the people world protected under the constitution. It was made to have a general Welfare of the society it is not actually but in the constitution, it is stated as what all will be the right and duty with will be followed by the people of the Parliament or the government under the constitution.
Learn more about the constitution, here:
https://brainly.com/question/14453917
#SPJ2
In the presidential election of 1840: a. the Whigs employed political tactics pioneered by Democrats. b. the Democrats nominated three regional candidates, hoping to throw the election into the House of Representatives. c. the Democrats and Whigs both produced platforms that clearly laid out the parties’ positions on major public issues. d. the Whigs again nominated Henry Clay. e. voter turnout dropped dramatically because no popular candidate like Jackson ran.
In the 1840 election, the Whigs adopted strategies similar to the Democrats, such as broad use of propaganda and rallies. They nominated William Henry Harrison, not Henry Clay. The Democrats put forward Martin Van Buren, not three regional candidates. Both parties avoided producing clear platforms on major public issues. Voter turnout was high at approximately 80 percent.
Explanation:The presidential election of 1840 was a significant event marking the culmination of the democratic revolution in the United States. This was a time when the second party system, characterized by the Democratic and Whig Parties, had taken hold. Large-scale presidential campaign rallies and emotional propaganda were utilized and voter turnout increased dramatically with around 80 percent of eligible voters participating, disproving the statement that voter turnout dropped.
The Whigs indeed used political tactics similar to the Democrats, including the use of propaganda and rallies. However, during this election, the Whigs didn't nominate Henry Clay; instead they nominated William Henry Harrison. The Democrats, on the other hand, did not nominate three regional candidates. Their candidate was President Martin Van Buren.
It's also worth noting that neither the Democrats nor the Whigs produced clear platforms that laid out the parties’ positions on major public issues. The issues of the time, particularly economy and westward expansion, were key talking points, but they were often discussed broadly and vaguely, with no clear policy plans.
Learn more about 1840 Election here:https://brainly.com/question/30761495
#SPJ6
Which of the following countries was not a member of the axis powers during World War 2?
Answer:
Countries part of the Axis Powers were Germany, Italy, and Japan.
1.Which would have the smallest effect on the amount of money a candidate spends on a campaign
the level of office the candidate is seeking
the number of opponents a candidate faces
the amount of money needed for media ads
running against an incumbent
The correct answer is B) the number of opponents a candidate faces.
The option that has the smallest effect on the amount of money a candidate spends on a campaign is the number of opponents a candidate faces.
Money in political campaigns has become an issue of public concern in the United States. Money is the big element that influences the decision of a political campaign and the influence it has on the voters. Many times, the political candidate that has the biggest advantage in the campaign is the one who has more money. Let's remember that in campaigns, money can be considered in two ways. Soft money is the unlimited amount of money given to political organizations or parties. Hard money is the money given to candidates that are subjected to the regulation of the Federal Elections Commission.
Brazil’s 1956 Development Plan designated what city as the site of the country’s foreign-led automobile industry beginning with Volkswagen?
(A) Belo Horizonte
(B) Curitiba
(C) São Paulo
(D) Rio de Janeiro
Answer: (C) São Paulo.
Explanation:
The 1956 Development Plan assigned greater Sao Paulo as the most suitable place for Brazil's first car assembly facility, developed by Volkswagen. This would also be the first Volkswagen’s plant away from Germany. After one year, the Volkswagen plant in São Bernardo do Campo, close to São Paulo, was finished and it began the production of the Kombi model.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Type a person’s name to complete each of the following.
1. ______ 's campaign in 1980 struck a tone of optimism.
2. During the election of 1980, ______ emphasized peacemaking.
3. The map shows that ______ won the election in a landslide victory.
(picture is for option 3)
Answer 1.
Ronald Reagan's campaign in 1980 struck a tone of optimism.
Reagan campaigned for increased defense spending, implementation of supply-side economic policies, and a balanced budget. His campaign was aided by Democratic dissatisfaction with Carter.
Hence, Reagan's campaign struck a tone of optimism.
Answer 2.
During the election of 1980, Jimmy Carter emphasized peacemaking.
Jimmy Carter emphasized peacemaking because he brokered a Hard-Won Peace Deal Between Israel and Egypt in 1978.
Answer 3.
The map shows that Ronald Reagan won the election in a landslide victory.
Republican nominee Ronald Reagan defeated incumbent Democratic president Jimmy Carter in a landslide victory. He won 489 electoral votes.
Learn More about 1980 Election:
https://brainly.com/question/7841753
Answer:
1. Ronald Reagan
2. Jimmy Carter
3. Ronald Reagan
Explanation:
Correct on edge 2022
Which best describes language differences between the Western Roman Empire and the Eastern Roman Empire?
1. People in the East spoke Arabic, while people in the West spoke Italian.=
2. People in the East spoke Greek, while people in the West spoke Latin.
3. People in the East spoke Latin, while people in the West spoke Greek.
4. People in the East spoke Italian, while people in the West spoke Arabic.
Hi !!
Answer ►
2- People in the East spoke Greek, while people in the West spoke Latin ;
☺☺☺
In the Western Roman Empire, people spoke Latin, while in the Eastern Roman Empire, people spoke Greek.
Explanation:The best description of language differences between the Western Roman Empire and the Eastern Roman Empire is that people in the East spoke Greek, while people in the West spoke Latin.
In the Western Roman Empire, which included regions like Italy, Gaul, Hispania, and parts of North Africa, Latin was the primary language spoken by the populace. Latin had been the official language of the Roman Republic and Empire for centuries.
In contrast, in the Eastern Roman Empire, centered around Constantinople (modern-day Istanbul) and encompassing regions like Greece, Anatolia, Syria, and Egypt, Greek became the dominant language. This linguistic shift had already been underway for some time, and by the 6th century, Greek had supplanted Latin as the primary language of administration, culture, and everyday life in the Eastern Empire.
This linguistic division is one of the many cultural and administrative distinctions that developed between the two parts of the Roman Empire over time, ultimately contributing to their separate historical trajectories. The Eastern Roman Empire, or Byzantine Empire, endured for nearly a thousand years after the fall of the Western Roman Empire in the 5th century.
Learn more about language differences between the Western Roman Empire and the Eastern Roman Empire here:https://brainly.com/question/30577944
#SPJ2
Compare the militarists in japan with the european fascists?
Both Japanese militarists and European fascists emerged from political and economic instability and sought more power and global prestige. While European Fascists, led by leaders like Hitler and Mussolini, dismantled democratic institutions and promoted racial supremacy and extreme nationalism, Japanese militarists saw themselves as protectors of the emperor and initiated direct actions to ensure Japan's future as they envisioned it. Both groups also had expansionist goals though the means to achieve these varied greatly.
Explanation:To compare the militarists in Japan with the European fascists, we have to delve into how their ideologies impacted politics and society in their respective regions. Both movements emerged in a context of political frustration, economic instability, and the longing for greater power and prestige on the world stage. However, there were significant differences in their ideologies and actions.
Japanese militarists operated out of a deep sense of duty and honor. They were contemptuous of civilian leaders, who they believed were incapable of solving domestic issues or addressing challenges from China and the Soviet Union. Therefore, some military officials took direct actions, even forming criminal conspiracies, to secure the future of Japan as they saw it. Their goal was not to eradicate the existing regime but to exert more influence within it – the emperor remained a central authority.
European fascists, exemplified by leaders such as Hitler in Germany and Mussolini in Italy, believed in consolidating complete power under dictatorial rule. They systematically dismantled democratic institutions and promoted fascist ideologies such as racial supremacy and extreme nationalism.
Both had expansionist goals - the Japanese sought a 'Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere' to break away from European and American influence, while the European fascists aimed for territorial gains in Europe. However, the methods used differed greatly, with European Fascists endorsing atrocities such as genocide and complete warfare, while though Japanese militarists committed war crimes, these were often not dictated by overt, racially-loaded ideologies as seen in European fascism.
Learn more about Comparing Japanese militarists and European fascists here:https://brainly.com/question/514654
#SPJ6
Which of the following is the best summary of Nixon’s thinking as presented in this passage?
“It is harmful to contest an effort to remove a president from office.”
“Resigning from the office of president is not constitutional.”
“It is important to fight attempts to remove a president, but I have lost that fight.”
Same passage:
In all the decisions I have made in my public life, I have always tried to do what was best for the Nation. Throughout the long and difficult period of Watergate, I have felt it was my duty to persevere, to make every possible effort to complete the term of office to which you elected me.
In the past few days, however, it has become evident to me that I no longer have a strong enough political base in the Congress to justify continuing that effort. As long as there was such a base, I felt strongly that it was necessary to see the constitutional process through to its conclusion, that to do otherwise would be unfaithful to the spirit of that deliberately difficult process and a dangerously destabilizing precedent for the future.
But with the disappearance of that base, I now believe that the constitutional purpose has been served, and there is no longer a need for the process to be prolonged.
–President Richard Nixon
August 8, 1974
Answer:
C) "It is important to fight attempts to remove a president, but i have lost that fight."
The summary of Nixon’s thinking which inferred from the passage is that "It is important to fight attempts to remove a president, but i have lost that fight."
What is Summary?This is referred to as the condensed version or brief statement about a point or text and key points are usually the priority.
Nixon summary of his thinking when he was about to be impeached in the passage is seen above.
Read more about Nixon here https://brainly.com/question/838319
What do the graphs show?
-Federal spending was causing the national debt to grow.
-The national debt was shrinking over time.
-Federal spending dropped during the Reagan presidency.
-Federal spending was less at the end of Reagan’s administration than at the beginning.
The graph showed that Federal spending was causing the national debt to grow.
What is the trend in federal spending?Since the 1960s, federal spending has been on a steady rise according to the graphs.
This has led to the federal deficit rising as well in order to fund the increase in spending.
Find out more on the federal deficit at https://brainly.com/question/25798561.
The graphs explicitly show that Federal spending was causing the national debt to grow. Option A. This is further explained below.
What is Federal spending?Generally, Federal spending is simply defined as the various things the federal government commits money to, and they are seen as federal expenditures.
In conclusion, Federal spending entails the country spending money on things required by the nation and this affects the national debt negatively as they usually incurred more debt to keep the state running.
Read more about Federal spending
https://brainly.com/question/10242393
#SPJ5
During the 1994 midterm election, the Contract with America was
a constitutional amendment.
a healthcare proposal.
a Democratic mandate.
a Republican agenda.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
a republican agenda is correct
The Contract with America during the 1994 midterm elections was a legislative blueprint or agenda provided by the Republican Party. It was not a constitutional amendment, healthcare proposal, or Democratic mandate, but a strategy that contributed to the Republican Party gaining a majority in the House of Representatives.
Explanation:The Contract with America was a significant element of the 1994 midterm election, but it was not a constitutional amendment, healthcare proposal, or Democratic mandate. Instead, it was a Republican agenda.
The Contract with America was a legislative blueprint provided by the United States Republican Party and was presented during the 1994 Congressional election campaign. It detailed the actions the Republicans pledged to take if they became the majority party in the United States House of Representatives for the first time in 40 years. This document was key in the Republican Party gaining a significant majority in the 1994 midterm elections.
Learn more about Contract with America here:https://brainly.com/question/2826470
#SPJ11
Why did President Carter want to reduce rules for businesses?
To increase the price of oil and gas
To lower costs for government and consumers
To lower costs for businesses and consumers
To increase the price of consumer goods
What President Carter did to reduce rules for businesses is: To lower costs for businesses and consumers.
Who is President Carter?President Carter was a former president of United state of america. He started is presidential tenure in the year 1977 and his tenure ended in the years 1981.
One of President Carter objectives was to reduce or cut cost for business owner and consumer as this will enable business owner profit to increase.
Therefore, what President Carter did to reduce rules for businesses is: To lower costs for businesses and consumers.
Learn more about President Carter here:https://brainly.com/question/17087215
Answer:
To lower costs for businesses and consumers- C
Explanation:
How did technology change daily life after world war 1
The emperor Justinian capitulated to the Huns and abdicated the throne, marking the end of the western Roman Empire. declared Constantinople the new capital of the eastern Roman Empire. abandoned all efforts to save the western Roman Empire based in Rome and its lands. (True/False)
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Justinian during his reign tried to restore the empire's eminence and reconquer the lost western region of the Roman Empire. Justinian's rule establishes an important period of history in the Later Roman Empire and his result of rebuilt or restoration activities, Justinian has seldom known as the last Roman Empire. This enthusiasm was displayed by the recovery of the territories of the expired Western Roman Empire.
Answer:
wrong
Explanation:
Which is true of African American soldiers in the Civil War?
A.
They were usually sent in first to battle.
B.
They were not allowed to fight in Confederate territory.
C.
They served in regiments with white soldiers.
They received less pay than white soldiers.
Discuss how the U.S. Constitution, including its amendments, provides for “a government of laws.”
Discuss the feature of the Constitution that you believe is most important in providing for “a government of laws.”
Answer:
Of course, the Bill of Rights does focus on individual rights, but those amendments were passed after the Constitution was written. (That is why they are called amendments to the constitution.) The U.S. Constitution implemented the supremacy of law using structure and processes.
The United States Constitution is the supreme law of the United States of America. The Constitution represents everything the country wanted to and still stands for. At first beginning with just 7 articles and an amiable way of getting through with the language, the Constitution made sure everyone could be able to read it and comprehend quite quickly the purposes of the national frame of government.
The Constitution, provides for a government of laws, starting with its Preamble:
“We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”
The Preamble is of great importance to understand the frame of mind the Founding Fathers’ had when implementing the supreme law, their intentions regarding its meaning and hopes.
The phrase “a government of laws, not of men” can be routed back to John Adams[1], one of the Founding Fathers’ and the second president of the U.S., when he described the ideal form of government. I believe it stands for the objectivity of interpretation, a government for all, not a government for some, one that is applicable to every individual without regard of their education, profession or position. A government of men would be subjective, and a government that treats some people differently than others is a system that just can’t lead to justice.
Therefore, the Preamble designs what are the intentions of the United States of America when formed and what they continue to be, after more than two hundred years later, today.
[1] “A government of laws, not of men” is how John Adams described the ideal form of government. The Constitution of the United States was designed to create such a government.
who wrote the bill of rights
Which best describes ancient Greece’s influence on modern government?
a: Greeks implemented a social government in Sparta.
b: Greeks implemented a feudalist society.
c:Greeks implemented a republic in Delphi.
d:Greeks implemented a democracy in Athens.
The correct answer is D) Greeks implemented democracy in Athens.
The statement that best describes ancient Greece’s influence on modern government is "Greeks implemented democracy in Athens."
Cleisthenes was the Athenian leader that introduced democracy in Athens in 507 BC. The term in Greek was "demokratia" and meant the "rule by the people." This new system was a well thought government system in that included three institutions. The Ekklesia, the body of government that dictated laws and foreign policies. Ther popular courts to resolve cases, and the Boule, a council of representatives.
What happened in China in the period between the Han and the Sui dynasties? It was a very confusing period, with many states existing at various times. The Huang Dynasty ruled throughout that period. The Sixteen Kingdoms ruled throughout the period. Three dynasties, the Qing, the Qong, and the Rhong, ruled consecutively.
Answer:
The Sixteen Kingdoms ruled throughout the period
Explanation:
The period between the Han dynasty and the Sui dynasty in China was a period of chaos, warfare, and constant change of rulers. It is the period in which the so called Sixteen Kingdoms ruled. They were mostly kingdoms formed by smaller ethnic groups in the northern part of China. In order to get as much territory and wealth as possible, these kingdoms were in constant war between each other and with anyone else standing on their way. This period of the Sixteen Kingdoms lasted for 125 years. Soon after, the Sui dynasty emerged, and it managed to finally put things under control.
Answer:
The Sixteen Kingdoms ruled throughout the period.
Explanation:
Drag each tile to the correct box. Place the events of World War II in the correct order. Battle of the Bulge Germany's surrender Battle of Berlin Liberation of Paris D-Day
Answer:
D-Day | Liberation of Paris | Battle of the Bulge | Battle of Berlin | Germany's surrender
Explanation:
Learn more about World War II here:
brainly.com/question/651584
#SPJ2
in hindu what are upanishads?
A.philosophy about the vedas
B.rules in the vedas
C.different chapters in the vedas
D.people presented in the vedas
Answer:
A. philosophy about the vedas
Explanation:
Upanishads are philosophy about the vedas, in Hindu.
A rising sense of nationalism in china was a reaction to
Answer:
the foreign exploitation of their territory and resources
Explanation:
The Chinese people were struggling for several centuries, especially after they fell under the rule of the Manchu. The Manchu rulers were of different ethnic group, and they didn't had in their best interest the Chinese identity and unity, but the opposite. These rulers also allowed the European colonial powers to bribe them, and with it to be granted the best Chinese ports and the area surrounding them. This led to economic downfall of China, as the profit from the trade through their ports was going in the European pockets, and their natural resources were used, but the Chinese people were not getting anything from it. This led to revolt, and gradually to revival of the nationalism in China. The people started to unite for their common interest, and to work together for their best interest.
Answer:
The strong foreign influence in China.
Explanation:
B on Edge 2022.
“Science tries to document the factual character of the natural world, and to develop theories that coordinate and explain those facts. Religion, on the other hand, operates in the equally important, but utterly different, realm of human purposes, meanings, and values.” This theory is described by Stephan Jay Goud in his book "Rock of ages" (True/False)
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Rocks of Ages is a book written in 1999 by Stephen Jay Gould, Harvard paleontologist. This book indicates the connection between religion and science. Science and religion have always been existed parallel to each other since its beginning because they deal with the two entirely separate and non-overlapping areas of reality in our society.
Final answer:
True,The statement reflects the principle that science and religion operate in separate realms of human understanding - science explains natural phenomena through facts and empirical evidence, while religion addresses questions of meaning, purpose, and values. This perspective, deeply influenced by Kantian philosophy, highlights that these two disciplines do not contradict but complement each other by focusing on different aspects of human experience.
Explanation:
The statement "Science tries to document the factual character of the natural world, and to develop theories that coordinate and explain those facts. Religion, on the other hand, operates in the equally important, but utterly different, realm of human purposes, meanings, and values." indeed encapsulates the essence of the discourse surrounding the interaction between science and religion as described by the philosophy of Immanuel Kant and echoed in various theological perspectives. This viewpoint underscores the non-overlapping magisterial (NOMA) principle, which proposes that science and religion, as diverse realms of human understanding, address different aspects of human experience - science focuses on understanding the how and what, delineating natural phenomena through empirical evidence and rigorous methodology, while religion explores the why, addressing questions of meaning, purpose, and moral values.
The philosophical underpinnings of this theory find roots in the ideas of prominent figures such as Kant, who delineated the distinct spheres of fact and value, and were further developed by theologians and philosophers who argued that science and religion, by virtue of their distinctive methods and concerns, could not contradict each other. They operate in separate domains, with science providing a framework for understanding the natural world through facts and laws, and religion offering a foundation for values, meaning, and purpose grounded in faith and spirituality.
Therefore, attributing this theory to Stephen Jay Gould in his book 'Rock of Ages' would be incorrect. Instead, it aligns more closely with the contributions of Kantian philosophy and the broader discourse on the relationship between science and religion as navigated through centuries by various scholars and theologians.
Which of the following was an advantage that the Eastern (Byzantine) Empire had that enabled it to survive as a political entity for a thousand years longer than the western part of the Roman Empire?
Answer: they had a stronger military force.
Explanation:
Modern scholars estimate that Justinian had under his command between 300,000 to 350,000 soldiers.
During the 1960s, the federal government passed the Civil Rights Act and the Voting Rights Act, resulting in a reduction in discrimination based on race, as well as an increase in rates of political participation among _______. In 1993, the National Voter Registration Act allowed easier access to voter registration. As a consequence of this legislation, voter registration increased across populations and the registration gap narrowed between _______.
Answer:
During the 1960s, the federal government passed the Civil Rights Act and the Voting Rights Act, resulting in a reduction in discrimination based on race, as well as an increase in rates of political participation among African Americans. In 1993, the National Voter Registration Act allowed easier access to voter registration. As a consequence of this legislation, voter registration increased across populations and the registration gap narrowed between White and minorities.
Final answer:
During the 1960s, the Civil Rights Act and the Voting Rights Act led to increased political participation among African Americans and narrowed the voter registration gap between racial groups. These acts were instrumental in eliminating barriers to voting for African Americans, particularly in the Southern United States. As a result, African American voter registration and turnout saw significant increases.
Explanation:
During the 1960s, the federal government passed the Civil Rights Act and the Voting Rights Act, resulting in a reduction in discrimination based on race, as well as an increase in rates of political participation among African Americans. In 1993, the National Voter Registration Act allowed easier access to voter registration. As a consequence of this legislation, voter registration increased across populations and the registration gap narrowed between different racial groups.
The Voting Rights Act of 1965 was particularly transformative, outlawing literacy tests and requiring federal oversight of elections in certain states. It authorized the use of poll watchers and registration examiners to supervise state and local elections, effectively removing barriers to black registration and voting. In Mississippi alone, the percentage of blacks registered to vote swelled from under 7 percent in 1964 to 60 percent by 1967.
How did the Supreme Court respond to New Deal legislation?
Answer:
Reactions to the New Deal. The Supreme Court has the power to decide if the president is acting constitutionally. ... In 1937 Roosevelt decided to prevent the Supreme Court from blocking his policies in the future by increasing the number of justices from nine to fifteen.
Explanation:
Final answer:
The Supreme Court initially struck down key New Deal legislation, leading to President Roosevelt's court-packing plan. A shift in the Court's stance occurred when Justices began to uphold New Deal laws before the plan was enacted.
Explanation:
The Supreme Court initially responded to New Deal legislation with skepticism and resistance, reflecting a dual-federalism mindset. They struck down several significant New Deal measures such as the National Industrial Recovery Act (NIRA) and the Agricultural Adjustment Act (AAA), arguing these were encroachments on states' rights. The Court's stance led to a significant confrontation with President Franklin D. Roosevelt, who proposed the controversial "court-packing plan" in 1937. This would allow him to add up to six new justices, tilting the balance in favor of New Deal policies. However, before this plan could be implemented, a shift occurred within the Court as Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes and Justice Owen Roberts began to vote in favor of New Deal legislation, alleviating the immediate constitutional crisis and allowing the New Deal to progress.
Which of the following did the 1951 hit I Love Lucy do? a. It proved the appeal of situation comedies on television. b. It stressed the importance of targeted audience ad campaigning. c. It highlighted the mistakes that networks can sometimes make. d. It generated funding for the network's entire lineup.
Answer:
Explanation:
The Goldbergs, I love Lucy, father knows best, leave it to beaver, twenty one, thunder on sycamore
-Disney arrived- advertising
-becoming more about suburban families, domestic comedies
The correct answer is A) It proved the appeal of situation comedies on television.
The TV sitcom "I Love Lucy " proved the appeal of situation comedies on television.
This TV comedy show is one of the most famous and classical in the United States. The first show aired from October 15, 1951, and the last show was on May 6, 1957. It lasted six seasons and had 193 episodes, played by CBS. It was the first TV show to be inducted to the Television Hall of Fame. A true American Family classic.