How does original jurisdiction differ from appellate jurisdiction for federal courts

Answer:

its true

Explanation:

Answer:

Increase Tension

Explanation:

The main motive of the provided sentence from the narrative snake story is to exaggerate tension.

The moral of the snake story is that there are some individuals who don't change their nature even if others are behaving well with them.

According to the given lines from the narrative snake story, the narrator seems to be terrified of the snake in front of her. She felt that she can't wait for a long time to left the snake but if she doesn't wait then it can harm her if it is a noxious snake. This all increases the tension in the mind of the narrator until the snake had left the place.

Therefore, the given lines provided a sense of increased tension that is experienced by the narrator in the story.

Learn more about the snake story in the related link:

https://brainly.com/question/9087604

#SPJ2

Answer:

it celebrates a day when the French masses rose up against oppression.

Explanation:

Bastille Day is a national festival that takes place in memory of the fall of the Bastille, the historic moment that begins the French Revolution.

The Bastille, or more precisely Bastille Saint-Antoine was a prison and a symbol of the absolute and arbitrary power of the Old Regime of Louis XVI. On July 14, 1789, the protesters took control of the fortress, being the first major intervention of the French people and breaking the absolute power of the king.

For French citizens this event is considered as the symbol of the battle against oppression and hence the importance of the date and the motivation for the whole celebration.

In this period the acclaimed principles of Freedom, Equality and Fraternity - Liberté, Egalité, Fraternité, the motto of the Revolution - have so far surpassed the aristocratic, monarchical and religious ideals towards the conquest of new forms of government grounded in democracy.

It was with the French Revolution that the absolutist monarchy, ruler of the country for centuries, was abolished.

Bastille Day symbolizes French national pride as it commemorates the fall of the Bastille on July 14, 1789, which was a significant event that sparked the French Revolution and led to the end of monarchical tyranny, embodying the French ideals of liberty, equality, and fraternity.

Bastille Day is a symbol of French national pride because it marks the pivotal event on July 14, 1789, when the people of Paris stormed the Bastille, a fortress that had come to represent the monarchy's tyranny. This act was a catalyst for the French Revolution, challenging the existence of the oppressive regime and signifying a shift towards liberty and equality. The storming of the Bastille highlighted the power of the people and the validity of their fight against despotism, marking the beginning of a new era where the nation, and not the monarchy, held sovereignty. Since 1880, Bastille Day has been commemorated as the national independence day by the citizens of France, celebrating the unity and independence of the French nation and its revolutionary ideals reflected in the Declaration of the Rights of Man.

The French Revolution was foundational in developing modern concepts of nationalism. It encouraged the rise of secular governance over religious authority, promoted the legal equality of citizens, and invoked a sense of collective national identity over allegiance to king and church. The revolutionaries' call to arms against external threats further solidified the idea of defending the fatherland (la patrie). Bastille Day thus stands as a testament to the revolutionary spirit and the overthrow of an oppressive rule, symbolizing the French people's pursuit of universal bliss, liberty, and equal rights.

Answer:    C. Saturated fat

Explanation:  Saturated fat is a type of fat that has a high percentage of fatty acid molecules. Such fat is present in animals, which is mainly animal fat, and as it is known, it remains solid at room temperature. In order to melt, it must warm up, what happens when cooking. Because of the high percentage of fatty acid molecules, it is not considered very healthy, certainly less healthy than unsaturated fats.

Answer:

The provisions of the Missouri Compromise stated in part that Missouri would be admitted to the Union as a slave state.

Explanation:

The Missouri Compromise was a decision made in the United States in 1819 to admit the states of Missouri and Maine as members of the Union.

In 1819, the admission of the state of Missouri to the United States was on the agenda of the Senate. As there were equal numbers of representatives of slave and free states in the Senate, it was decided to reach a compromise in order to maintain the balance: two states were going to be adopted at the same time, one free and the other slave. In addition to slave Missouri, Maine, which did not allow slavery, became a member of the United States. The demarcation line for slavery was also determined, as slavery would be allowed only south of the 36º 30' north latitude (plus the state of Missouri, which was north of it).

Answer:

Jededihah Smith

Explanation:

Answer:

Jededihah Smith

Explanation:

Hope this helps!

Final answer:

In a representative democracy, citizens elect representatives to make laws and decisions for them, as opposed to making these decisions themselves as in a direct democracy. This method is practical and scalable, especially in larger nations where direct democracy would be logistically challenging.

Explanation:

In a representative democracy, unlike a direct democracy, the citizens do not make laws and decisions directly. Instead, they elect officials, known as representatives, to make decisions on their behalf. In indirect democracy, these representatives are accountable to the electorate and are expected to serve the interests of their constituents. This form of governance allows for a more manageable and scalable approach to lawmaking, especially in populous nations like the United States, where direct voting on every issue would not be logistically feasible.

For example, U.S. citizens vote for members of Congress, the president, and other officials in local and state governments. These elected representatives, in turn, enact laws and policies as per the majority's will, within the bounds of a constitution-based federal republic. However, the idea of direct democracy is not entirely absent in the U.S., as seen through practices like referendums and initiatives that allow citizens to vote on specific issues.

Final answer:

In a representative democracy, citizens elect representatives to make decisions and pass laws on their behalf, contrasting with a direct democracy where citizens vote on all laws directly. The U.S. is a representative democracy with elements of direct democracy, such as referendums, but primarily relies on elected officials for governance.

Explanation:

Unlike a direct democracy, in which all citizens have the power to decide laws and policies directly, a representative democracy is a system where citizens elect officials to represent their interests, make decisions, and pass laws on their behalf. In the United States, a form of representative democracy is practiced, whereby the populace votes for representatives such as members of Congress, state legislators, governors, and local officials. These representatives are responsible for making policy decisions that reflect the will of their constituents. This differs from a direct democracy where citizens would vote on each policy or law individually, an approach seen in ancient societies like Athens.

The United States combines both representative democracy and elements of direct democracy through tools such as referenda and propositions, which allow citizens to vote directly on specific issues. However, the primary method of governance is through elected representatives, adhering to a constitutional framework that outlines the separation of powers and checks and balances among branches of government. This design aims to enable efficient governance while maintaining democratic values and preventing potential abuses of power.

Okay the correct answers are A B and C.

Final answer:

The growth of communism in Asia and its impact on the United States during the Cold War, focusing on the Chinese civil war and the Korean War.

Explanation:

The growth of communism in Asia had a significant impact on the United States during the Cold War era. The Communist victory over the Nationalists in the Chinese civil war led the US to fear the spread of communism in Asia, especially as the Korean War erupted in the early 1950s when North Korea invaded South Korea, with the US backing the South against communist forces.

"The Communist Party gives farmers power": the main idea is it trying to spread. Thus, option B is the correct option.

Mao Zedong, also known as Chairman Mao (26 December 1893 – 9 September 1976), was a Chinese communist revolutionary who founded the People's Republic of China (PRC). From the PRC's founding in 1949 until his death in 1976, he served as the head of the Chinese Communist Party. His ideas, military tactics, and political ideologies are generally referred to as Maoism since he was a Marxist-Leninist.

Mao was raised in Shaoshan, Hunan, as the son of a wealthy peasant. Early in his life, when the Xinhai Revolution of 1911 and the May Fourth Movement of 1919 strongly affected him, he backed Chinese nationalism and had an anti-imperialist viewpoint. The Nationalist government was overthrown by Mao's soldiers, and it fled to Taiwan in 1949.

Learn more about Mao Zedong here:

https://brainly.com/question/16650147

#SPJ3

The Boldt Decision was concerned with the Medicine Creek Treaty, which established fishing rights for Native American tribes in Washington. This landmark 1974 court case affirmed those rights and has influenced resource management in the region.

The Boldt Decision was concerned with the Treaty of Isaac Stevens. The Treaty of Isaac Stevens was negotiated in 1855 between the United States and several Native American tribes in the Washington Territory, including the Nisqually, Puyallup, Squaxin Island, and other tribes. This treaty played a crucial role in defining fishing rights and land ownership.

The question relates to the Boldt Decision, which was concerned with interpreting treaties between the United States and Native American tribes regarding fishing rights. Among the options provided, the relevant treaty is the Medicine Creek Treaty. The Medicine Creek Treaty was one of several treaties negotiated in the mid-1850s between the United States and Native American tribes in what is now the state of Washington. The Boldt Decision (United States v. Washington, 1974) interpreted these treaties, affirming the fishing rights of tribes and allocating significant portions of annual fish harvests to them. This landmark legal ruling has had lasting impacts on fishing rights and resource management in the Pacific Northwest.

 The Justinian Code was created in order to create one single set of laws for all of the Byzantine Empire. This code was extremely important because it served as the basis for everyday actions within the empire including marriage, criminal justice, slavery, and property rights. Along with this, the code ended up serving as the basis for the laws of the Byzantine Empire for the next 900 years. Countries all over world use ideas from Justinian Code's in order to form a comprehensive set of laws. The four sections of the code are the Codex Constitutionum, Digesta, Institutiones, and the Novella Constitutiones Post Codicem.

Final answer:

The rational basis test permits discrimination if it is rationally related to a legitimate government interest, but when discrimination involves characteristics like race or sex, the courts apply strict or intermediate scrutiny. The Equal Protection Clause ensures that unjust discrimination is not tolerated unless there is a substantial justification.

Explanation:

The rational basis test of the Equal Protection Clause allows for laws or policies that treat people differently if the discrimination is "rationally related to a legitimate government interest." For example, prohibiting blind people from driving due to safety concerns, or universities setting academic standards for admission to ensure students can succeed in their programs. Conversely, when it comes to discrimination based on race, color, ethnicity, sex, gender, sexual orientation, religion, or disability, the courts will often apply a different standard, such as strict scrutiny or intermediate scrutiny.

Race-based discrimination typically triggers strict scrutiny because it often reflects historical biases and requires a compelling government interest to be upheld. In contrast, discrimination based on sex or gender typically undergoes intermediate scrutiny, which requires that the discriminatory policy serve an important government interest and that it is substantially related to achieving that interest. The Equal Protection Clause is crucial in protecting individuals from unjust discrimination by ensuring that any unequal treatment is justified and aligned with constitutional principles.

see that the first document is told in more historical way. it has lots of Historical backgrounds and info about the events. B is different in the way that it isn't at all based with Historial background knowledge. it talks about modern day and the effects of it today not the effects of it back when it first happened. Also some specific evidence in the text is at the end when you read the date, 1922. you can clearly see that's when the article  was published and times have changed from 1922 to the second date found at the bottom of page B which says 1963. 

Answer:

Not everyone agrees on its causes or its possible solutions.

Explanation:

Answer:

Multiple Voices

Answer:

Community residents must communicate issues and needs, participate in local government, volunteer to help, and organize with other residents.

Explanation:

hope this helped!!!

Answer:

False

Explanation:

It is false that during Enlightenment, Catholicism continued to be the dominant religion in Scandinavia. In fact, during Enlightenment, religion in general declined slightly all over Europe, as the ideas of science and reason gained ground. Moreover, people who were still religious in Scandinavia generally adhered to various branches of Protestantism.