I need all the answers in 40mins, please don't give me bad answers for my points!

1. The speaker of Oration VII desires to —
a.
be like a man in power and prestige
b.
exert power over men through beauty and grace
c.
live peacefully on her manor with her husband and sons
d.
resolve the question of women’s rights through intellectual discourse

2. The speaker of Oration VII goes on to ask, “But why should we desire to be masculine, since our own sex and condition is far the better?” What inference could you not logically draw from this or the previous quotation from the same speech?
a.
Speaker VII has never experienced suffering.
b.
Speaker VII would rather be queen of England than be a male commoner.
c.
Speaker VII is female.
d.
Speaker VII believes it is better to be female.

3. The following is based on the excerpts of Speakers I-IV from "Female Orations" by Margaret Cavendish.

Which speaker is the only one who praises and does not criticize men?
a.
Speaker I
c.
Speaker III
b.
Speaker II
d.
Speaker IV

4. What does the speaker in Oration I plead for?
a.
Freedom for women to associate
b.
Permission to write for publication
c.
More time to speak about women’s rights
d.
Education for all girls in England

5. When the first orator says, "The truth is, we live like bats or owls . . . ," it is most likely that these animals are chosen for the comparison because of their association with
a.
darkness.
c.
difficult labor.
b.
intelligence.
d.
efficient hunting.

6. Regarding men, the speaker of Oration III —
a.
feels they are the source of women’s sufferings
b.
feels that although they have often mistreated women, men’s point of view needs to be understood
c.
feels that men are superior to women and women are almost nothing without them
d.
feels that if men had to bear children, and women didn’t, power would be reversed

I think the answer

B. It supports the main point that this is an ongoing fight that America will not abandon.

Answer: B) Something about their story just didn't add up, but that's not my problem.

Explanation: From the given options, the one that would best convey the point of view of a trader who buys the boy as a slave, is the corresponding to option B, because as we can see, he has doubts about the boys' story, but he doesn't really care. The sentence A seems to be from the point of view of the boy being sold, and the sentences C and D, from the point of view of the boys that sold their brother.

The correct option is “honest portrayal”. Realism is an artistic style that emerged in the 19th century in France, especially in painting and writing. The main purpose of realism is to portray accurately real life and places. Realism is opposed to the Romantic movement so the option “romanticized life experience” is not a characteristic of realism. Exaggeration and melodrama are not related to Realism since it depicts reality in a detailed and honest perspective.

Answer:

honest portrayal

Explanation:

correct on odyssey

this is wrong answer

Answer:

Collins points out that individuals often perceive themselves as the center of the universe. However, Tyson’s article and the video on ASASSN14-li show that humans are miniscule and powerless compared to even the smallest black hole.

Explanation:

Answer:

A. Many Americans did not support the war.

Explanation:

The Vietnam War was a very controversial conflict. It lasted an extremely long time, and once the United States was involved, it was very difficult to take the troops out of the conflict. Moreover, politicians were unwilling to end the war, despite enormous public opposition. Many atrocities were committed during the war, and the United States was responsible for a huge number of them. Therefore, when soldiers returned to the country, they were seen as contributors to an event most people detested. This meant that they were shunned when they returned home.

The repetition of the word “whirl” creates a sense of  "intensity".

"Oread", one of Hilda Doolittle’s best-known lyrics, which was first distributed in the issue of BLAST in 1914, serves to outline this early style well. The title Oread was included after the piece was first composed, to propose that a nymph was ordering up the ocean. Here is the short poem, (One of my favorites);

Whirl up, sea—  

whirl your pointed pines,  

splash your great pines  

on our rocks,  

hurl your green over us,  

cover us with your pools of fir.  

The repetition of the word "whirl" creates a sense of confusion, intensifying the atmosphere and emotions conveyed in the text, highlighting the turmoil and erratic nature of the situations described.

The repetition of the word "whirl" creates a sense of confusion. Throughout the excerpts provided, the word "whirl" is repeated to emphasize a state of confusion and chaos, evoking a feeling of disorientation and disorder.

This repetition serves to intensify the atmosphere and emotions conveyed in the text, highlighting the turmoil and erratic nature of the situations described.

By utilizing this linguistic device, the author effectively conveys a sense of confusion that permeates the themes and emotions portrayed in the various passages.

Answer:

i just took the test it is C

Explanation:

The first one is "the process or product cultivating living organisms"

The second one is "knowledge of and taste in fine arts and humanities"

The third one is "the customs, beliefs, and values of a group of people"

I hope this helps, Enjoy :)

The answer to your question is,

C. Comparison

-Mabel <3

A. contrast is your answer.

the answer is one  he killed only one of his men

In the epic poem Beowulf, Grendel, the monstrous creature, kills many of Beowulf's men during his nightly raids at Heorot. The exact number is not specified, but his actions create terror and highlight Beowulf's heroism when he eventually defeats Grendel.

In the Anglo-Saxon epic poem Beowulf, the monstrous creature Grendel is indeed a formidable foe. In the story, Grendel attacks Heorot, the mead-hall of King Hrothgar, killing and devouring many of Beowulf's men during his nightly raids. While exact numbers are not given, it is clear he killed a significant number. However, it is important to note that the focus of the narrative is not solely on the number of victims, but rather the terror that Grendel instills and the heroism of Beowulf in eventually confronting and defeating the beast.

https://brainly.com/question/837576

Answer: The tone in this excerpt is solemn, witty, outspoken and persuasive.

Explanation: The tone of a literary work can be understood as the approach or the attitude that the writer conveys towards the subject of his or her work. Even though Angelou is certainly referring to the harhsness that those working in plantations picking up cotton and other products had to endure, particularly in the last hours of the day, when "nature's blessing of grogginess, forgetfulness and the soft lamplight" had faded, hers, I believe, is not a resentful or an outraged tone, at least not in this excerpt. Instead, the tone of the author in this excerpt is solemn, witty, outspoken and persuasive, and it relates to her difficult upbringing and her personal experience as a Civil Rights advocate and activist.    

The excerpt from Maya Angelou's 'I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings' reflects a mournful and reflective tone in its portrayal of Black Southern life, aligned with Angelou's personal perspective and writing style.

Tone: The tone in the excerpt from Maya Angelou's 'I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings' can be described as reflective and mournful. Angelou's use of words like 'harshness,' 'grogginess,' and 'forgetfulness' conveys a sense of sadness and resignation towards the challenges faced by Black Southern life.

Individual Experience: Angelou's personal perspective shines through in the excerpt as she reflects on the complexity and duality of Black Southern life, blending nature's softness with the harsh realities experienced.

This tone aligns with Angelou's overall writing style that often delves deep into the emotional and empowering aspects of her personal journey and the larger struggles faced by the African American community.

The Answers fam are..........

Tessa understands that flexibility is necessary, so she will revise the script so the main character fits the available actor better. (True)

Tessa will dismiss the actor from the project because he is not right for the role and does not fit her plan. (False)

Tessa will rush to find an actor who can portray the character the way she had originally planned. (False)

Tessa will take the available actor’s strengths into account when she alters her plan. (True)

Answer:

true, false, false true

Explanation:

my wiwi told me :3 also how has these been here for 2 years and only 1 answer ):

Answer:

the basketball hoop because the sentence is referring to the basketball hoop not just the basketball

Explanation:

The dialogue samples from the conversation between Annie Choi and her mom reveal various aspects of their relationship, their individual personalities, and their cultural backgrounds. Here's a breakdown of the dialogue:

 Dialogue Sample 1:

- Annie Choi: ""I'm a vegetarian.""

- Mom: ""You're not a vegetarian. You ate chicken last week.""

This sample shows that Annie identifies as a vegetarian, but her mom challenges this identity based on recent observations. It suggests that Annie's dietary choices are a point of contention or at least confusion between them.

Dialogue Sample 2:

- Annie Choi: ""That's because I was hungry and there was nothing else to eat.""

- Mom: ""There's always something else to eat.""

Here, Annie is explaining her decision to eat chicken despite being a vegetarian, while her mom insists on the availability of alternatives. This indicates that Annie's mom may not fully understand or support her vegetarian lifestyle, or she may be expressing concern about Annie's nutrition and food choices.

Dialogue Sample 3:

- Annie Choi: ""Not when you're cooking.""

- Mom: ""I can make you vegetarian food.""

This exchange highlights the mom's willingness to accommodate her daughter's vegetarianism, suggesting a caring and adaptable nature. It also shows that Annie might feel her dietary needs are not always considered in her mom's meal planning.

Dialogue Sample 4:

- Annie Choi: ""It's not the same.""

- Mom: ""You used to eat everything.""

This dialogue reflects a generational or cultural gap, with the mom reminiscing about the past when Annie was not a vegetarian. It indicates a possible struggle for Annie to assert her current identity and for her mom to accept the change.

What does this dialogue show about the writer, Annie Choi?

1. Annie is a vegetarian, which is an important part of her identity.

2. She feels that her dietary preferences are not always respected or understood by her mom.

3. Annie is willing to compromise her vegetarianism under certain circumstances, such as hunger and lack of options.

4. She values authenticity in her dietary choices and feels that substitutes are not adequate.

 1. She is pragmatic and perhaps skeptical about the vegetarian lifestyle.

2. She cares about her daughter's nutrition and is willing to provide alternatives.

3. She may have difficulty accepting changes in her daughter's identity or lifestyle choices.

4. She has a memory of Annie's past eating habits that contrasts with her current vegetarianism.

1. There is a level of tension or misunderstanding regarding Annie's vegetarianism.

2. They are both willing to communicate about their differences, indicating a foundation of open dialogue.

3. The mom is supportive in her own way, offering to make vegetarian food for Annie.

4. Their relationship is influenced by cultural expectations and generational differences, which can lead to friction over lifestyle choices like diet.

This analysis of the dialogue between Annie Choi and her mom shows the complexities of their relationship, their individual perspectives, and the cultural context in which their interactions take place. It highlights the challenges that can arise when personal choices conflict with family traditions or expectations."

The correct answer is He withholds the fact that the falling horseman is the father of the shooter.

Throughout the story, the author yields a slow-paced description of the scene settings as a means to visually guide the reader. Moreover, they throw in clues such as the watchman's hesitation to shoot the horseman, as if the glance of the latter over the direction of the watchman caused him to react in that manner. This act may initially confuse the reader, but it isn't until the story's end that the horseman's identity is revealed, and so the climax of the story is explained and the surprise factor kicks in the reader.

The rest of the options are not as impactful since:

The watchman's conversation with his father seems ordinary at first, given the father's reaction to his son's desire to join the regiment. The revelation of the horseman's identity explains many of the phrases of this conversation, such as the father addresing the son as a traitor, meaning that both of the would fight on separate sides of the war. This is more fulfilling to the reader, rather than surprising.

The horse didn't bolt off the cliff until the watchman fired, but if it did before the shot, it wouldn't have been impactful to the story at any rate - considering the main surprise at the end.

My pet's unique habits

My cat, whose name is Corcho, is seven years old and has an extraordinary personality. He is quite possessive and does not want other cats to be near his human friends. Actually, he slaps them - especially his sister cat Greta. Even though he is not too friendly with other cats, he is incredibly sweet and affectionate with people. He chases almost every person who comes to visit the family home, and does not go away until he has received (and given) a huge amount of demonstrations of love and great care. Not only that, he also enjoys jumping up high furniture, such as the bookcase, the TV and the cupboards in the kitchen, from where he does not want to go down at once! Finally, I should mention his sleeping habits. He likes changing his bed every now and then. If he sleeps on a bed for a few months, he will fancy sleeping in a box or on a jacket for another while - as well as on the newspaper!

A good friend is someone who stands by you through thick and thin, offering support and understanding regardless of the situation.

They are the ones who celebrate your successes with genuine joy and provide a shoulder to lean on during tough times. Good friends are not just companions for leisure activities; they are confidants who listen when you need to talk and offer advice when you seek it. They accept you for who you are, embracing your quirks and flaws without judgment.

In essence, a good friend is like a mirror reflecting your true self, helping you to see the best in yourself and others. As we navigate the complexities of life, the presence of a good friend can make all the difference, providing comfort in times of sorrow and amplifying moments of happiness. The bond of friendship is a treasure that enriches our lives in countless ways, making every challenge surmountable and every triumph even more delightful.

The paragraph above demonstrates the use of subordinate clauses to add variety and smoothness to the writing. It begins with a defining clause, who stands by you through thick and thin, to describe a good friend. This clause is essential to the sentence as it provides a specific characteristic of a good friend.

The next sentence uses a relative clause, offering support and understanding regardless of the situation, to further elaborate on the qualities of a good friend.

The paragraph continues with a variety of sentence types, including compound sentences joined by coordinating conjunctions, such as They are the ones who celebrate your successes... and provide a shoulder to lean on... This structure allows for the addition of more details without creating run-on sentences.

Subordinate clauses are used throughout the paragraph to provide evidence and explanation, such as when you need to talk and when you seek it, which are adverbial clauses that explain the conditions under which a good friend listens and offers advice.

The use of a simile, like a mirror reflecting your true self, adds imagery and depth to the description of a good friend's role in one's life. This metaphorical language helps to convey the idea that friends help us to understand ourselves better.

The paragraph concludes with a complex sentence that encapsulates the value of friendship: The bond of friendship is a treasure that enriches our lives in countless ways, making every challenge surmountable and every triumph even more delightful.

This sentence uses a relative clause, that enriches our lives in countless ways, to modify the bond of friendship, and it ends with a parallel structure, making every challenge surmountable and every triumph even more delightful, to emphasize the impact of friendship on life's experiences.

Well, though you don't think the answer isn't b, it just seems like the perfect answer for the question.

Your answer is,

B.

(An example of a paradox is: Your enemies friend is your enemy.)

The line from the poem Love After Love uses a metaphor to describe the concept of reconnecting with one's past self.

The line "You will live again the stranger who was your self." from the poem Love After Love involves the use of a metaphor, choice D. A metaphor is a figurative speech in which a word or phrase is applied to an object or action to which it is not literally applicable. In this case, the metaphor conveys the concept of one's previous self being a stranger - a person that doesn't know one in the present. This usage leaves a profound and deeper understanding of the poem and intensifies the emotional effect.

https://brainly.com/question/13020675

#SPJ2

Answer: B Working with others can be helpful

Explanation:

The rose anticipates what happens to the guests. Dr. Heidegger first uses it to demonstrate the rejuvenating power of the elixir; and later it withers right before the same thing happens to the old guests. If you believe that the elixir is nothing more than alcohol, then the rose is a key part of the dramatic show that Heidegger puts on for his guests in order to convince them that they are in fact growing young and then old again.

In "Dr. Heidegger's Experiment" by Nathaniel Hawthorne, the rose symbolizes the passage of time and its effects. At first the rose, that has been given to the doctor by his fiancee fifty-five years ago, shows all the effects of time "...though now the green leaves and crimson petals had assumed one brownish hue..."

And his old friends are depicted "...They looked as if they had never known what youth or  pleasure was, but had been the offspring of Nature's dotage, and always the gray, decrepit,  sapless, miserable creatures, who now sat stooping round the doctor's table, without life  enough in their souls or bodies to be animated even by the prospect of growing young again ..."

Through the changes that the rose suffers, after been put in the water from the Youth Fountain, "...The crushed and dried petals stirred, and  assumed a deepening tinge of crimson, as if the flower were reviving from a deathlike  slumber; the slender stalk and twigs of foliage became green; and there was the rose of half  a century, looking as fresh as when Sylvia Ward had first given it to her love..." so we can predict what will happen to the guests.  "...Assuredly there was an almost immediate improvement in the aspect of the party...together with a sudden glow  of cheerful sunshine brightening over all their visages at once. There was a healthful  suffusion on their cheeks, instead of the ashen hue that had made them look so corpse-like..."

Answer: a way to determine a word’s meaning is to study what surrounds it.

This statement is the only correct one. An easy way to determine the meaning of a word is by its context. Context is determined based on the words and phrases that surround a particular word. These surrounding words often give us clues as to what the word is trying to convey. This is true even with words that have more than one meaning. This also means that a dictionary is not the only way to determine the meaning of a word.

A way to determine a word’s meaning is to study what surrounds it.

A way of knowing the meaning of a word is to study the context in which the word was used. This is because a word may have more than one meaning.

For example, consider this sentence : She killed her test. If the italicised word is looked at in isolation, it would indicate murder. But when other words in the sentence are studied, the italicised word mean that she performed excellently in her test.

The meaning of a word can also be determined by checking for the word in the dictionary.

A similar question was answered here: https://brainly.com/question/4291435?referrer=searchResults

An informational text should not include a subjective voice or provide a point of view on what is being informed. Also, no personal opinions should be allowed. Therefore, options 4) “provides interpretation or judgment” and option 5) “uses subjective voice” are not part of an informational text.

As regards option 3) “includes the main ideas of original texts”, this should not be included in the summary of an informational text as we are referring to a summary and not to the development of main ideas from other texts.  

In this case options 1) “avoids interpretation or judgment” and option 2) “includes an introductory statement” are the correct options since an informative text should provide facts, dates and statistics of a given topic and also the summary of this type of texts should include an introductory statement of the topic discussed.  

An  item describes a feature that should  be part of a summary of an informational text,

An item describes a feature that should  not be part of a summary of an informational text,

A summary refers to a brief introduction of any topic in your own words to make the reader easily understand the plot and setting of any story and help them to engage effectively.

The summary contains an introductory statement that tells the foundation of the story as tells what the story is all about without adding any opinion or judgment.

Summary avoids subjective tone rather it should be focused on objective tone aims to achieve something. It also does not provides any judgment or opinion to the reader.

It is referred to as a short brief so it does not include the main ideas of the original text. It just highlights the key elements which are important to discuss.

Learn more about Summary, here:

https://brainly.com/question/24839707

#SPJ2

A protagonist is the main character, basically, and the antagonist is person with bad intentions :)

Advertisements is one way companies make money from broadcasting material for free

Advertisements help them advertise their products so they get money.

Answer: Unity is correct :) Hope this helps!