This would most likely be because of the vast amount of plantations that are in the South. The invention of the cotton gin also allowed farmers to produce cotton fast and efficiently. This meant because so many plantation owners wanted to sell as much cotton as possible they wanted more slaves to do the work.
How long did sharecropping and tenant farming last in the south
It started in the 1870's and it ended in the 1950's
Hoped This Helped
The answer is Into the 1930s
to refuse to buy something
What was one cause of the Spanish Civil War?
A.Nationalists wanted to restore the monarchy of Spain.
B.Marxists wanted to establish a communist government.
C.Military leaders staged a coup to create a fascist government.
D.Conservatives in the military revolted against authoritarianism.
Answer is C!
C. Military leaders staged a coup to create a fascist government.
The Spanish Civil War was between the Republicans and the Nationalists. The coup, supported by the military units, left Spain militarily and politically split. The Nationalists was supported by the Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy with soldiers, ammunition etc. The Republicans was backed by the Communist Soviet Union and leftist Mexico. The War lasted from 1936 to 1939.
The right is the: C. Military leaders staged a coup to create a fascist government.
Explanation:The event of the Spanish Civil war was held in between the Republicans and also among the Nationalists. Nationalists were hugely supported by Nazi Germany all along with the Fascist from Italy along with soldiers.
can someone help me with this one
B is your correct answer
Why can an industry that enjoys economies of scale easily become a natural monopoly ?
because average cots drops as production rises
The correct answer is: "Because it can decrease its production costs and the price charged for its products up to a point that is unreachable for other competitors".
A monopoly is a market structure where a single firm serves the whole demand of a specific good or service. It does not face competitors, therefore, such firm has absolute market power to decide the price charged for its products.
On the other hand, when a company enjoys economies of scale it means that it has reached a large enough productive capacity to be able to decrease its average production costs. Such firm can become a natural monopoly because, if its competitors do not reach economies of scale too, they will be expelled from the market as they cannot compete in prices with the monopolist.
Which of the following contributed to social upheaval or cultural conflicts in the United States during the 1920s? revival of the Ku Klux Klan
Prohibition
Scopes trial
Fascism
I'm pretty sure it's prohibition.
Answer:
I have a similar question except it has four answer choices.
The answer choices I have are "Scopes trial", "revival of the Ku Klux Klan", "Fascism", and "Prohibition".
Out of my choices, I'm chosing Scopes, KKK, and Prohibition.
Sadly, it doesn't tell me what questions I got correct, it only shows me the over-all grade, so I can't tell you if that's correct.
Explanation:
Try "Prohibition", and "Scopes trial" :)
EDIT: I was correct, Prohibition and Scopes trial are the correct answers. Sorry for the blur
1. what about Korea’s location made it susceptible to Ming pressures, such as having to pay tributes?
2. About what percentage of Japan was controlled by Tokugawa or related to households when Tokugawa leyasu took power in the early 1600s?
Question 1:
Korea's location has played a central role in their relationship with China thorughout history. China's proximity to the Korea meant that both cultures greatly influenced each other, and there was significant trade operating in this area. However, China has had a stable government and large population for much of its history, giving them a considerable advantage in military affairs. Also, the proximity of Japan to both countries represented a common threat that often motivated alliances.
During the Ming dynasty, interactions between the two countries were mostly peaceful and close, based on their shared Confucian values and their shared origin from Mongol rule.
Question 2:
Tokugawa Ieyasu was the founder and first shogun of the Tokugawa Shogunate of Japan. The shogunate ruled Japan from 1600 until the Meiji Restoration in 1868. Ieyasue obtained power in 1600 and remained in power until his death in 1616. When Tokugawa Ieyasu took power in 1600, about 20% of Japan was controlled by Tokugawa or related households.
Final answer:
Korea's proximity to Ming China put it under pressure to adhere to tribute demands due to its less powerful status. Tokugawa Ieyasu gained control over Japan in the early 1600s, but the exact percentage of control is not specified in the provided materials.
Explanation:
Korea's Geopolitical Susceptibility to Ming China :
Korea's geographic location, neighboring the powerful Ming dynasty, made it susceptible to Ming pressures, such as the imposition of tribute systems. Being a smaller nation sandwiched between China and Japan, Korea often found itself in a position where it had to acquiesce to the demands of more powerful neighbors to maintain its sovereignty and peace. The tributary system that Korea was part of not only demonstrated its subordinate relationship to China but also ensured a form of diplomatic relations and mutual benefits, albeit with Korea in a lesser position.
Tokugawa Control of Japan :
When Tokugawa Ieyasu took power in the early 1600s after the Battle of Sekigahara in 1600, he and his related households controlled a significant portion of Japan. However, the exact percentage of this control is not clearly stated in the provided materials. Nevertheless, the consolidation of power under the Tokugawa shogunate marked the beginning of a period of relative peace and national unification, which was in contrast to the previous era of continuous internal strife among various daimyos.
which statement best explains how south carolinians used human resources to gain prosperity? (A) "Slaves were reserved for working only the largest plantations". (B) "They hired local young men as their primary source of labor". (C) "They created contracts with indentured survants to help work their land". (D) " The colony provided small group of slaves to each small farmer
Final answer:
South Carolinians used human resources to gain prosperity mainly through the enslavement of Africans which provided a permanent labor force for cultivating labor-intensive crops.
Explanation:
The best statement that explains how South Carolinians used human resources to gain prosperity is that they relied heavily on enslaved Africans for labor. In the southern colonies, including South Carolina, there was great demand for labor to cultivate labor-intensive crops such as tobacco, rice, and indigo. The turn to slavery provided the needed permanent labor force, as initially, the number of indentured servants coming from Europe was insufficient. Slavery in the Carolinas took a firm hold due to the influence of settlers from Barbados, where slavery was already an established practice. By the end of the 1600s, a class of wealthy rice planters used enslaved labor for their prosperity. The legal basis for slavery was cemented in the early 1700s, drawing from the Barbados slave codes. Therefore, slaves were not just reserved for the largest plantations; they were a widespread source of labor that enabled the growth of the southern economy.
Read the following excerpt from the Declaration of Independence.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.—That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,—That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.
Based on the excerpt, what was a major factor that led the colonists to rebel against the British government?
A. The government had failed to protect the colonists’ basic rights.
B. The government was exploiting the colonies’ natural resources.
C. The government used colonial money to benefit the monarch.
D. The government imposed unjust tax rates on rebelling colonists.
It is A. The government had failed to protect the colonists’ basic rights.
Hope this helps....
Answer:
A) The government had failed to protect the colonists basic rights.
Explanation:
The excerpt above discusses the concept of unalienable rights. Unalienable rights are "god-given" rights that all citizens possess. These rights are sacred, as they are never supposed to be taken away or infringed upon by a government.
However American colonists at this time felt that the British government, specifically King George III, was violating these rights by seizing property, implementing taxes without representation, and forcing the quartering of British soldiers.
These offenses against American civil liberties helped spark the American Revolution.
HELP ME PLEASE!!!, HAVING TROUBLE!
I believe that the answer would be B. Hope this helps :)
Identify the goods produced in colonial Georgia and explain how these goods contributed to mercantilism.
urmar has 5 dimes in his left pocket.He has 3 dimes in his right pocket. A dime is worth 10 cents How much money does Umar have? draw a bar diagram to help answer the hidden question, draw a bar diagram to help answer the main question
Answer:
80
i5 times10 equals 50 plus 3 times 10 which equals 30 and 30 plus 50 equals 80
To find : Total Money, owned by Urmar
Given : 5 and 3 dimes in left & right pockets respectively ; a dime = 10 cents
So, total money of Urmar
= ( Total dimes ) x number of cents per dime
= ( 5 + 3 ) x 10
= 8 x 10
= 80 cents , or 8 dimes
Hence, Urmar has 80 cents , or 8 dimes
To learn more, refer https://brainly.com/question/12174267?referrer=searchResults
Why do people live where they live in Todays time period?
Help Asap!!
People choose where they live based on several factors including economic opportunities, social connections, environmental considerations, and personal preference. Job prospects, proximity to family and friends, climate and personal needs and wants can all influence someone's choice of living place.
Explanation:There are several factors that determine why people live where they live today. The primary reasons include economic opportunities, social connections, environmental considerations, accessibility to amenities, culture, and personal preference.
Economic opportunities play a significant role in determining where people live. Cities and metropolitan areas, with their abundance of job opportunities, attract people seeking work. Conversely, regions with fewer economic opportunities tend to see an outmigration of residents.
Social connections can also influence where individuals choose to reside. People often live close to family or friends or in communities with shared cultural or ethnic identities.
Furthermore, environmental considerations, such as climate, scenery, and access to outdoor recreation can be a draw for some individuals. Lastly, personal preference, which can encompass a range of individual wants and needs, often leads people to choose where they live.
Learn more about Geographical Living Choices here:https://brainly.com/question/31597656
#SPJ11
It is the opinion of the greatest writers, that a very extensive country cannot be governed on democratical principles, on any other plan, than a confederation of a number of small republics, possessing all the powers of internal government, but united in the management of their foreign and general concerns. —"Centinel", Letter to the Freemen of Pennsylvania According to this quote, which issue would make ruling too hard for the government under the Constitution? A. political factions B. the size of the country C. executive power D. the separation of powers
According to the given quote, the issue that would execute commanding too difficult for the government under the Constitution is the property of the country.
What is the constitution?A constitution is defined as an aggregation of fundamental principles and that principles were established representatives that function as the legal relation of an organization, or any another type of entity.
According to the quote that is given in the case, the size of the country would make it difficult for the government to rule under the Constitution.
Therefore, option B is correct.
Learn more about the constitution, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/19411179
#SPJ2
The correct option is B.
The quote from 'Centinel' indicates that the main issue with ruling under the Constitution is the size of the country. Managing a large, diverse area would be challenging without a confederation of smaller republics.
According to the quote from 'Centinel', the issue that would make ruling too hard for the government under the Constitution is the size of the country.
The mention of a 'very extensive country' suggests that governing a large area on democratic principles would be challenging without a confederation of small republics. This reflects concerns about distance and the complexity of managing diverse interests across a vast region.What did the No Child Left Behind Act do?
The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) is a federal law that provides money for extra educational assistance for poor children in return for improvements in their academic progress. NCLB is the most recent version of the 1965 Elementary and Secondary Education Act.Jan 4, 2008
It tied schools’ federal funding to students’ academic success.
What is an armada? an army led by priests a large fleet of warships soldiers armed with bows and arrows any invading military force
Armada is the spanish word for Navy, so an armada is a large fleet of warships.
Then, the armada or navy is the armed service in charge of the defense of a country by sea or inland waters. For this purpose, it operates with destroyers, frigates, corvettes, beacon ships, tugboats, minesweepers, amphibious assault ships and some with aircraft carriers, submarines and mini-submarines. They also have a naval aviation, a marine infantry force used for amphibious operations, communications media, training, etc., added to all their personnel, both military and civilian.
What did Phillis Wheatley and Mercy Otis Warren have in common? Both fought for African American rights. Both fought to secure women's rights. Both wrote poetry about freedom and slavery. Both wrote works supporting the Patriot cause.
Phyllis Wheatley and Merci Otis Warren, both wrote about freedom and slavery.
Phyllis Wheatley (1753 – 1784) was born in West Africa and brought in as a slave to North America. The Wheatley family to whom she was sold, taught her to read and write and encouraged her to take up poetry. She is the first African-American female poet.
Merci Otis Warren (1728 – 1814) was a political writer, who supported the American Revolution and encouraged the colonists to stand up against the British, through her writings and propaganda work.
What was the purpose of the Civil Rights Act?
Answer:
to fight discrimination based on race and sex
Explanation:
:)
Which best explains the high cost of Asian goods?
They were expensive luxury items designed for the wealthy.
They had high carrying costs.
They had taxes added in the European towns.
The rulers of China and India demand high prices from consumers.
Answer:
They were expensive luxury items designed for the wealthy.
Explanation:
The asian goods were somthing that not all people could afford, because they had to be transported from Asia so carrying cheap objects wasn´t profitable so they started to export more and more expensive items that the merchants were able to sell to the wealthy people back in Europe, spices and fabrics were the most demanded asian goods and were signs of wealth in Europe.
Answer:
A. They were expensive luxury items designed for the wealthy.
Explanation:
In four to five sentences, explain what some of the consequences might be if people in authority were not bound by certain rules governing their behavior.
please help.........
89pt
Here it goes:
People in authority have many additional rights, and if these are not controlled (which they are, but not always work) things can get bad. For example, corruption. Corruption is a dishonest act of people in power which most of the time involve the fraude of money. When those im power start "robbing" money, many things can happen such as: not being able to pay or reducing pensions, public services will worsen, etc.
Hope it helped,
BioTeacher101
Hello....
In four to five sentences, explain what some of the consequences might be if people in authority were not bound by certain rules governing their behavior.
Well, everyone can't be part of the authority. Some of the consequences may include being robbed in many occasions and being not able to pay back those losses. Another really big problem is corruption. People can turn really bad and destroy the United States.
the huge number of settlers from the united States in texas led to
Independence movement in Texas.
What were the major effects of a dust storm? Give your answer in at least four sentences.
Dust in the air do have harmful effect. The effects of theses dust storm are;
It can lead to problems for airplanes. Dense dust can limit the visibility for pilots, causing delays and cancellations. Dust storms can also cause mechanical problems in airplanes.Breathing dusty air during a dust storm can result in health problems especially for people with asthma.Inhalable particles may get trapped in the nose, mouth and upper respiratory tract and it can lead to respiratory disorders such as pneumonia, allergic rhinitis, silicosis etc.The Dust storm is due to a lot of economic and agricultural factors, such as federal land policies, changes in regional weather, farm economics etc.
Learn more from
https://brainly.com/question/9304045
The major effects of a dust storm include:
1. Air Quality Deterioration: Dust storms significantly reduce air quality by increasing the concentration of particulate matter in the atmosphere. This can lead to respiratory issues for humans and animals, aggravating conditions such as asthma and allergies.
2. Visibility Impairment: The high concentration of dust particles in the air can drastically reduce visibility, posing hazards for transportation, particularly air and road travel. This can lead to accidents and travel delays.
3. Soil Erosion and Agricultural Impact: Dust storms can strip away valuable topsoil, which is rich in nutrients and essential for agriculture. This soil erosion can reduce crop yields and threaten food security. It can also lead to the spread of plant diseases and pests.
4. Economic Consequences: The impacts on transportation, agriculture, and health can have significant economic consequences. Clean up costs, healthcare expenses, and lost productivity due to transportation delays and reduced agricultural output can strain local and regional economies.
5. Environmental Damage: Beyond the immediate effects on soil and air quality, dust storms can also have long-term environmental impacts. They can contribute to the silting of waterways, damage to sensitive ecosystems, and the alteration of local climates by affecting the reflectivity of the Earth's surface.
6. Human Health Risks: In addition to respiratory problems, exposure to the particulate matter carried by dust storms can lead to more serious health issues, including cardiovascular diseases. Vulnerable populations such as the elderly, children, and those with pre-existing health conditions are at higher risk.
7. Infrastructure Challenges: Dust storms can damage infrastructure by clogging filters and machinery, leading to maintenance issues and operational downtime for various industries. They can also disrupt power supply by affecting electrical transmission lines and solar energy generation.
in100-150 words compare and contrast the four sections of the codex justinian
The Justinian Code was important as it simplified and streamlined centuries of existing Roman laws and Justinian's own laws and into one system. Four sections made up the code, and these were the Codex Constitutionum, Digesta, Institutiones and the Novellae Constitutiones Post Codicem.
Justinian I was Emperor of the Roman Byzantine Empire from 527 to 565. The first code, which included only the Codex was completed in 529. The Digesta and Institutiones were added in 534.
In the effort to simplify the code of laws, Justinian appointed 10 men to research all known laws and ordinances in the history of the empire. The commission siphoned out any outdated laws or laws that contradicted each other, and the result was known as the Codex Constiutionum.
The Digesta was a collection of 50 books of jurists rulings over the centuries. Any rulings that didn't appear in these books were then unable to be cited by lawyers in any court tribunal. This collection was built upon the research of 16 lawyers. The Institutiones amounted to a textbook for law students.
Finally, the Novellae Constiutiones Post Codicem acted as a supplement to the code and included Justinian's own ordinances that he announced between 534 and 565. This collection was added to the code after the first revision of the code.The Justinian Code was important as it simplified and streamlined centuries of existing Roman laws and Justinian's own laws and into one system. Four sections made up the code, and these were the Codex Constitutionum, Digesta, Institutiones and the Novellae Constitutiones Post Codicem.
What evidence exists that makes aye seem guilty for killing king tut?
Final answer:
Speculations about Aye being responsible for Tutankhamun's death primarily stem from Aye's sudden rise to power following Tutankhamun's untimely demise. While there is no definitive evidence proving Aye's guilt, the circumstances of his ascent to pharaoh after marrying the widowed Ankhesenamun amidst a time of religious and political turmoil have fueled these theories.
Explanation:
The question 'What evidence exists that makes Aye seem guilty for killing King Tutankhamun?' refers to the historical speculations surrounding the death of the young Egyptian pharaoh Tutankhamun. The suspicion towards Aye, who was Tutankhamun's advisor and became pharaoh after marrying the widowed Ankhesenamun, arises from the tumultuous period of transition that followed Tutankhamun's untimely death at the age of eighteen. While there is no concrete evidence that directly implicates Aye in the murder of Tutankhamun, this unsettled period in Egyptian history, the young age of Tutankhamun's death, and Aye's ascension to the throne shortly thereafter have contributed to the theory that Aye could have had a motive to facilitate his own rise to power.
Speculation about Ay's involvement in King Tutankhamun's death is based on his quick accession to power and marriage to the widow Ankhesenamun, but no concrete evidence has been found to conclusively name him as the murderer. Theories regarding King Tut's death vary widely with no definitive proof.
Explanation:There are multiple theories surrounding the death of King Tutankhamun, including one that implicates his successor, Ay, in the young king's death. One piece of circumstantial evidence against Ay is his rapid accession to the throne; he married Tutankhamun's widow, Ankhesenamun, which allowed him to become pharaoh. Historical records indicate a return to traditional religious practices following Akhenaten's monotheistic reign, which was consolidated under Tutankhamun and furthered by Ay. There are also suggestions of an attempt to erase Akhenaten and his successors from history, a process that began under Smenkhkare and continued under Tutankhamun and Ay.
However, there is no definitive evidence that Ay was responsible for Tutankhamun's death. Theories include a chariot accident or a hippopotamus attack, and modern scientific analysis, such as the C-14 decay rate testing, has been focused on determining how long ago King Tutankhamun died rather than finding proof of murder. It is important to note that much speculation still surrounds the death of King Tutankhamun, and no concrete evidence has been found to conclusively name Ay or any other individual as his murderer.
Thomas Paine's Common sense convinced colonists to
Paine published Common Sense, a hugely influential pamphlet that convinced many American colonists that the time had finally come to break away from British rule.
Reforms to law enforcement in the 1930s were intended to _____.
In the 1930s America went through a crime wave caused mostly by illegal traders of alcohol and gangsters. To control this increasing criminality wave, which included murder and armed robbery American government implemented twelve measures which made reforms in the procedures of the law enforcement agency.
Such reforms included, among others, making a federal offense to rob banks so criminals could not keep escaping prosecution by crossing state lines and giving agents of the Bureau of Investigation (or FBI) the authority to carry weapons as well as to make arrests.
Answer:
increase educational and ethical standards to improve the quality of law enforcement
Explanation:
i got it right
The crisis in Syria is a result of the collapse of the political sphere and rise of instability across the Middle East beginning in 2011 in Egypt with the Arab Spring Uprising. Which community does not want to impose military sanctions to stop the conflict and thereby restricting the United Nations in its ability to intervene? European Union International Community OPEC NAFTA
The Arab Spring was a loosely related group of protests that ultimately resulted in regime changes in countries such as Tunisia, Egypt and Libya. Not all of the movements, however, could be deemed successful—at least if the end goal was increased democracy and cultural freedom. In fact, for many countries enveloped by the revolts of the Arab Spring, the period since has been hallmarked by increased instability and oppression. Given the significant impact of the Arab Spring throughout northern Africa and the Middle East, it’s easy to forget the series of large-scale political and social movements arguably began with a single act of defiance.
The Arab Spring began in December 2010 when Tunisian street vendor Mohammed Bouazizi set himself on fire to protest the arbitrary seizing of his vegetable stand by police over failure to obtain a permit. Bouazizi’s sacrificial act served as a catalyst for the so-called Jasmine Revolution in Tunisia. The street protests that ensued in Tunis, the country’s capital, eventually prompted authoritarian president Zine El Abidine Ben Ali to abdicate his position and flee to Saudi Arabia. He had ruled the country with an iron fist for more than 20 years.
What was an achievement which helped contribute to the downfall of the Zhou?
A.
introduction of coins
B.
iron metalworking
C.
Confucianism
D.
wheelbarrow
B. Iron Metalworking
Confucianism was an achievement which led to the downfall of the Zhou.
Confucianism as a religion was founded by Master Kong. He did this to unveil the mystery behing the religion of the Zhou dynasty. This religion was the push factor for the better ideals, social values andphilisiphy of the Chinese society.
The scandal proved to be President Nixon's undoing.
Why is the deductive reasoning stronger than inductive reasoning
Inductive reasoning is the opposite of deductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning makes broad generalizations from specific observations. Basically, there is data, then conclusions are drawn from the data. ... Even if all of the premises are true in a statement, inductive reasoning allows for the conclusion to be false.
Answer : The correct answer is : In deductive reasoning the conclusion is inferred from the premises. Induction can be justified or validated while induction is not. The deductions are analytical. In inductive reasoning, the truth of the premises does not guarantee the truth of the conclusion. Induction is synthetic.