The one main difference between the state constitution and your state constitution is that your state constitution can slightly change some things from it to make it their own
For each statement use the drop down menu to indicate whether it was a characteristics of the north or the south
Give us options to choose from, please!
south
south
south
south
north
Who was the roman governor tha ordered jesus’s trial and execution?
For whom were the first ready-to-wear suits made in America?
The first ready-to-wear suits in America were produced for mail-order customers by factories in New York and Chicago, leveraging assembly line methods for efficiency. These garments catered to a broader audience and represented a shift from custom-tailored clothing due to economic and technological changes, with unions playing a key role in advocating for workers' rights.
The first ready-to-wear suits in America were made primarily for mail-order customers and were produced by factories in cities such as New York and Chicago. These factories employed agents who traveled to towns large and small to take measurements and orders for suits. The suits were made in a method similar to assembly line production, with the work divided into 'sections' for efficiency. Men's suits were being produced en masse to cater to a wider clientele, allowing for faster production and less individual tailoring.
During the period before World War I, technological advancements and economic realities paved the way for ready-to-wear clothing, largely influenced by the fact that intricate construction and customized fitting were too time-consuming and expensive to maintain for everyday garments, though they continued to be employed for business suits and special occasions.
The Jewish and Italian custom tailors and laborers in New York contributed significantly to the garment industry, forming unions and consolidating their efforts to fight for better work conditions, such as in the strikes of 1913. Their tenacity led to significant improvements, such as a reduced fifty-three-hour work week and increased wages.
How much did the United States pay for the Louisiana Purchase? A) $10 million B) $5 million C) $20 million D) $15 million
D. 15 million
Hope it helps!
i think the answer is 15 million
What type of response did the Curtis Act evoke from the Five Civilized Tribes
The Curtis Act evoked a negative response from the Five Civilized Tribes as it removed restrictions protecting their lands and abolished tribal governments. The act led to the loss of control over reservation lands and the exploitation of Native Americans for their land and resources.
Explanation:The Curtis Act, enacted in 1898, evoked a negative response from the Five Civilized Tribes (Choctaw, Cherokee, Chickasaw, Muscogee, and Seminoles) of Oklahoma. This act removed the restrictions that had previously protected the tribes from allotment of their lands, thereby allowing non-Natives to purchase their lands. It also abolished tribal governments, stripping the tribes of their sovereignty.
The Curtis Act opened up millions of acres of land for sale to white farmers and ranchers, leading to the rapid loss of control of reservation lands by the tribes. Additionally, the discovery of oil and valuable natural resources further exacerbated the situation, as individuals sought to swindle the Native Americans out of their land or mineral rights. This act had devastating consequences for the tribes, resulting in the loss of their land, culture, and heritage.
Which of the following is NOT a theory about why the Minoan civilization disappeared?
A. an earthquake
B. a volcanic eruption
C. famine
D. the Persian Wars
The answer is C. Famine
The Persian Wars is not a theory related to the disappearance of the Minoan civilization. Disappearance theories commonly involve natural disasters or famine, but not the later Persian Wars.
Explanation:Out of the options provided about theories related to the disappearance of the Minoan civilization, D. the Persian Wars is NOT one of them. The Minoan civilization, based on the island of Crete, was a significant Bronze Age culture which declined and disappeared around 1400 BC, several centuries before the Persian Wars. Theories about their disappearance involve a large-scale natural disaster, such as a volcanic eruption or earthquake, or a prolonged period of famine. The Persian Wars, however, took place much later, between Greece and Persia, in the 5th century BC, and is not believed to be directly related to the fall of the Minoan civilization.
Learn more about Disappearance of Minoan Civilization here:https://brainly.com/question/2035147
#SPJ3
Why did Franklin's father take him to visit tradespeople?
A.) to distract Franklin from his dreams of the sea
B.) to convince Franklin that candle making was his best option
C.) to determine what kind of trade suited Franklin best
D.) to help Franklin learn how to make his own inventions
The answer is C.
Franklin's father wanted to help Franklin find a kind of work that suited his talents.
Answer:
c
Explanation:
The answer is C. because......
Franklin's father wanted to help Franklin find a kind of work that suited his talents.
HELP AS SOON AS POSSIBLE PLEASE WILL MAKE THE BRAINLIEST
Which factor could help cause the fall of a civilization?
A.
enormous wealth
B.
poorly managed irrigation
C.
signs from the gods
D.
neighboring deserts
Answer: B) poorly managed irrigation
Explanation:
What was one of the similarities of the Maya's, the Incas, and the Aztecs?
There are many similarities but I have listed one below.
All 3 pre-columbian major civilizations the mayam the Maya, the Aztec, and the Inca were all without the one thing that we always see in early civilizations. It's a geographic feature which is a river. So there was no rivers. That in itself was very odd and rarely do civilizations develop without rivers.
Which of the following led to end of the Neo-Sumerian Empire?
A. internal conflict
B. attacks from outside forces
C. the lack of political leadership
D. the lack of a constant food source
B. attacks from outside forces
hope this helped
Why is the cell theory considered a scientific theory? A. It has always been proven to be correct. B. It was proposed by several scientists. C. It was formed over 100 years ago. D. It is an explanation that is well supported.
The cell theory is considered a scientific theory primarily because of "It is an explanation that is well supported. option D.
" Here's a more detailed explanation:
A scientific theory is a comprehensive and well-substantiated explanation of a natural phenomenon based on a body of evidence and experimental observations.
It is a fundamental concept in the scientific method, and theories serve as the highest level of scientific understanding.
The cell theory meets the criteria of a scientific theory for several reasons:
**Empirical Evidence:**
The cell theory is based on extensive empirical evidence gathered through centuries of scientific observation and experimentation. Researchers have used microscopes and various techniques to study cells and have consistently found that living organisms are composed of cells.
**Reproducibility:**
The observations supporting the cell theory are reproducible.
Different scientists using different methods and instruments can independently verify the existence of cells in living organisms.
**Predictive Power:**
The cell theory has predictive power.
It provides a framework for understanding biological processes and predicting how cells function, divide, and interact with their environments.
**Consistency with Existing Knowledge:**
The cell theory is consistent with other established scientific principles and knowledge in biology, such as genetics, evolution, and biochemistry.
"It has always been proven to be correct," is not entirely accurate because scientific theories are always subject to refinement and revision as new evidence and discoveries emerge.
While the cell theory has been robustly supported by a wealth of evidence, it has evolved over time to accommodate new findings.
"It was proposed by several scientists," is true to some extent, but the key criterion for a theory is not the number of scientists who proposed it but the strength of the evidence supporting it.
"It was formed over 100 years ago," is not a defining characteristic of a scientific theory.
The age of a theory does not determine its validity or status as a theory; it's the evidence and support that matter.
For similar questions on theory
https://brainly.com/question/30759437
#SPJ3
What is the main reason so many Great Society programs became law during the Johnson presidency?
The reason why Great Society programs were passed so easily during the Johnson Presidency was because the Democrats had a super majority in Congress.
What was Congress like under Johnson?When Johnson was elected into office, the Democratic party he was part of also gained a super majority in both the Senate and the House of Representatives.
This allowed Johnson to pass a lot of his ideas known as Great Society programs into law because the democratic supermajority often backed the President.
Find out more on Great Society programs at https://brainly.com/question/18720238.
Ill feelings arose between the states because of claims to the: mississippi valley florida territory northwest territorylouisiana territory
northwest territory
hope this helps
Spunetimi 3 motive de ce primii oameni in preistorie sau deplasat si sau asezat pe teritorii foarte intinse
Three reasons why prehistoric people were settling deeper inside the mainland territories are:
- Less natural disasters;
The inland territories are much less effected by natural disasters, and the climate is much more predictable and its much safer for living in this areas, and this is a big factor when deciding where to live.
- Dense vast lowland forests;
The vast forests inside of the continents were of huge importance to the early people because they were providing lots of food sources for them, so naturally people were moving into the areas were food was more abundant.
- Bigger and more abundant pray;
The bigger pray that can feed the people better and for longer time was usually located deeper into the continents, so people were attracted by the opportunity to have much bigger and stable food sources.
Imagine that you are a 14-year-old girl, from a poor family, working in a factory in the year 1890. Organizers are encouraging you and your coworkers to unionize. How might you react? Explain your answer.
As a 14-year-old girl working in a factory in 1890, my reaction to the encouragement to unionize would depend on my understanding of the benefits and risks involved. I might be hesitant, enthusiastic, or cautious about joining the union.
Explanation:If I were a 14-year-old girl working in a factory in the year 1890, my reaction to the encouragement to unionize would depend on my understanding of the benefits and risks involved. Here are a few possible reactions:
I might be hesitant to join the union because I am from a poor family and may not fully comprehend the concept and potential benefits of collective bargaining. I might also be concerned about the repercussions of joining, as factory owners often punished unionized workers by firing them or cutting their wages.I might be enthusiastic about joining the union because I understand that by uniting with my coworkers, we can negotiate for better wages, shorter work hours, safer working conditions, and an end to child labor. I would see the union as an opportunity to improve not only my own circumstances but also the lives of other workers.I might be cautious about joining the union because I fear the potential consequences of organizing. I might worry that factory owners would use their power and influence to suppress the union and retaliate against its members.In any case, the decision to join or not to join the union would ultimately depend on my personal circumstances, level of awareness about labor rights, and the perceived risks and benefits of unionization.
As a 14-year-old girl from a poor family working in a factory in 1890, deciding whether to unionize would depend on factors such as fear of retaliation, hope for better conditions, solidarity with coworkers, lack of awareness, distrust of authority, and pressure from family. The conditions of the time and personal experiences would shape the decision.
As a 14-year-old girl from a poor family working in a factory in 1890, the prospect of unionizing would likely evoke a mix of emotions and considerations. Fear of Retaliation: I might be afraid of potential consequences if the factory owners find out about my involvement in unionization efforts. In the 19th century, workers often faced harsh treatment, dismissal, or even blacklisting for participating in such activities. Hope for Better Conditions: Despite the fear, the idea of joining a union could be appealing. Poor working conditions, long hours, and low pay were common issues in factories during that time. Joining a union might offer the possibility of negotiating for better wages, shorter work hours, and improved working conditions. Solidarity with Coworkers: If my coworkers are supportive of the unionization efforts, a sense of solidarity could develop. Knowing that we are all in this together might make the idea of unionizing more attractive. Collective action often carries more weight than individual protests. Lack of Awareness: Being young and working in challenging conditions, I might not be fully aware of the broader social and economic issues surrounding labor rights and unions. Education and awareness campaigns by organizers could play a crucial role in helping me understand the potential benefits of unionizing. Distrust of Authority: Growing up in a poor family, I might have experienced or witnessed exploitation and distrust of authority figures. This could make me more receptive to the idea of challenging the factory owners through unionization, seeing it as a way to stand up against unfair treatment. Pressure from Family: If my family is supportive of the idea of joining a union, it could influence my decision. On the other hand, if they are worried about potential repercussions, they might advise against it.
In summary, my reaction to the encouragement to unionize would depend on a variety of factors, including my understanding of the issues, fear of consequences, solidarity with coworkers, and the influence of family. The conditions of the time and my personal experiences would shape my perspective and ultimately determine whether I would support and participate in unionization efforts.
In which country did nationalist groups work to unite several independent kingdoms into a single nation-state during the mid-19th century ? a. Russia b. Japanc. China d. Italy
Answer:
Option D.
Explanation:
Italy, is the right answer.
In the mid 19th century, there emerged a political and social movement in Italy that unified a number of states of the Italian peninsula into the unique state of the Kingdom of Italy. This movement began in the year 1815 with the inauguration of Congress of Vienna and came to an end in the year 1871 when Rome became the capital of Italy.
In Italy, nationalist groups succeeded in unifying several independent kingdoms into a single nation-state during the mid-19th century, culminating in the establishment of a unified Italy by 1861.
Explanation:In the mid-19th century, nationalist groups worked to unite several independent kingdoms into a single nation-state in Italy. This was a period marked by a surge in nationalist sentiment where people with a shared cultural and linguistic heritage sought political unity. The concept of nation-states was popularized by thinkers like Giuseppe Mazzini, and over the course of the century, despite some setbacks during the revolutions in 1848, the drive for unification persisted. By 1861, Italy was successfully unified and became an independent nation after being long divided into separate city-states and under the influence of foreign powers like the Austrian Empire and the Catholic Church.
Why did some military officers object to the use of poisonous gas as a weapon?
they didn’t believe it would be effective in killing enemy soldiers
it was too expensive to manufacturer
they thought it was an unfair and barbarous way to fight
Answer:
They thought it was an unfair and brutal way to fight
Explanation:
The use of poisonous gas poses a risk threat to people. It causes serious problems in the lungs and the throat that result in mild body effects or causing death .
The weapons are also ineffective since the gas envelopes to the legs of the troops, creating body complication. This is because of the dangerous chemical used to manufacture the weapons. The chemicals are hazardous and should not be in contact with the human body since they increase the risks of body damage.
Why was a weak central government set up under the Articles of Confederation?
to stop abuse of power and tyranny by the central government
to expand the taxation powers of the central government
to copy the government after that of Great Britain
to run the independent states with limitless power
to stop abuse of power and tyranny by the central government
Alexander was the son of _____.
Aristotle
Philip
Philip II
Alexander I
If you're talking about Alexander the great, his father was Philip ll
Hope this helps =)
The Tar Creek region was once one of the world’s richest __________ fields.
A.
oil
B.
natural gas
C.
gypsum
D.
lead mining
Please select the best answer from the choices provided
Answer:
It’s D
Explanation:
I just took the test
vladimir lenin enacted which policy as the leader of the soviet union
Final answer:
Vladimir Lenin enacted the New Economic Policy (NEP) as the leader of the Soviet Union. The NEP aimed to revive the Soviet economy after years of war and economic crisis.
Explanation:
The policy enacted by Vladimir Lenin as the leader of the Soviet Union was the New Economic Policy (NEP).
The New Economic Policy was implemented in 1921 and aimed to revive the Soviet economy after years of war and economic crisis.
It introduced limited market exchange of goods and allowed small-scale private enterprise, while the state still maintained control over key industries. The NEP led to a temporary improvement in living standards and a cultural renaissance in the arts and literature.
?
What combat advantage did the Spanish conquistadores have over the native peoples?
They developed immunity to diseases.
They learned the native peoples' languages to intercept messages.
They created alliances with other European invaders.
They attacked on horseback and used swords.
They attacked on horseback and used swords is the combat advantage did the Spanish conquistadors have over the native peoples.
Who were the Spanish conquistadors?Spanish Conquistadors are the sanctioned pirates. Their main objective is to take the lands and resources for their investors. They also conquer the lands for Treasury and show glory. They have major role in spreading the regions.
Thus, option D is correct.
For more details about Spanish conquistadors, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/1314391
#SPJ2
Do you think Africans needed to be enslaved in order to civilize them and bring religion? 5 sentences
No. If that racist sentence were true than you would have to enslave whites Mexicans and all aswell. This sentence is false. In fact had the white not enslaved the black than maybe the black wouldn’t have to worry about “white cops” pulling them over or messing with them.
How does the portrayal of Nero’s character in this painting compare to what you've read about Nero in "The Contest" and in the article?
They both seek of still paintings. They hold to the coloration.
The scene of people about to be burned before a large gathering and the painting's title are consistent with Nero's reputation as a harsh, ruthless tyrant, which the story and article also support. The scene in the painting closely relates to information in the article about Nero's persecution of Christians. Some people in the scene seem upset, but Nero is watching people about to be burned without any hint of being disturbed by what he sees. The tiger Nero holds by the leash might symbolize Nero's harshness and ferocity. The people about to be burned remind the audience of what it's like to be a victim of immense cruelty and injustice.
thats the plato answer!
What countries were the triple entente was a political alliance formed between?
describe ancient greek philosophy.
Ancient Greek philosophy arose in the 6th century BC and continued throughout the Hellenistic period and the period in which Ancient Greece was part of the Roman Empire. Philosophy was used to make sense out of the world in a non-religious way.
Ancient Greek philosophy emerged in Greece and is considered the birthplace of Western philosophy. It began with the Presocratics and continued with the three great philosophers Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle.
Explanation:Ancient Greek philosophy emerged in ancient Greece and is considered the birthplace of Western philosophy. It began with the Presocratics, followed by the three great philosophers Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle. The ancient Greek philosophers engaged in dialectic and debate, using rational methods to seek knowledge.
The roots of classical thought in Greece can be traced, at least in part, to Egypt. Ancient Greek philosophy was a practical endeavor, emphasizing the search for internal peace and contentment. Furthermore, In their quest for knowledge, the ancient Greeks also employed discussion and dialectic. These discussions then served as a knowledge gainer in various aspects.
Learn more about Ancient Greek Philosophy here:https://brainly.com/question/29774517
#SPJ3
Why was rail construction concentrated in the east before 1870 and in the west after 1870
The correct answer is :
It was highly populated in the east vs. the west, so there was more money to build the railroads.
Rail construction was concentrated in the east before 1870, and in the west after 1870, because there was a need to increase the connectivity of routes in the east in order to fulfill the requirements of transportation of traded goods.
What is the significance of rail construction?Rail construction was introduced in the European colonies like India in the years during the 1850s. This was because, railways were needed to enable faster and better connectivity of trade routes for transportation of goods as well as commute of people.
Rail construction in the west, however, started very late towards the end of the nineteenth century because western world was already well-connected via roadways as well as waterways through canals.
Therefore, the significance of rail construction has been aforementioned.
Learn more about rail construction here:
https://brainly.com/question/27824813
#SPJ2
Why did the Dakota Sioux start an uprising in 1862? The government had not followed through with promises of help. The government had given help to an enemy American Indian group. The Sioux were not allowed to sell hunted animals to the US government. The Sioux had made an agreement with neighboring tribes to attack.
The correct answer is - The government had not followed through with promises of help.
The conflict resulted because of treaty violations by the United States government, and also by late or unfair annuity payments by the Indian agents. Throughout the 1950's this led to starvation among the Dakota (Sioux) people, and they were very frustrated about it.
Officially, thee conflict started when few Dakota hunters killed few white settlers that were also hunting, and afterwards the Dakota decided that they should kick out the white settlers from their territory and it is estimated that they killed around 800 men, women, and children. The US government responded with military action, captured lot of Dakota warriors, and some of them executed by hanging.
The Dakota Sioux started an uprising in 1862 due to unfulfilled promises from the government, restrictions on selling hunted animals, and alliances with neighboring tribes.
Explanation:The Dakota Sioux started an uprising in 1862 due to a combination of reasons. One of the reasons was that the government had not followed through with promises of help, leaving the Sioux feeling neglected and frustrated. Another reason was that the Sioux were not allowed to sell hunted animals to the US government, which impacted their livelihood. Additionally, the Sioux had made agreements with neighboring tribes to attack, using the uprising as an opportunity to resist against the encroachment of settlers on their lands.
Learn more about Dakota Sioux uprising in 1862 here:https://brainly.com/question/33029253
#SPJ6
What statement about the puritains is not true?a. They settled in new englandb. They welcomed people of all religionsc. They believed in education for alld. They worked hard to succeedplease hurry!
The Hawaiian Islands were formed from a type of catastrophic event, occurring many times. Each island in the chain is composed of at least one major. What is that major?
Catastrophic events on Earth have both negative and positive effects. One positive effect is the formation of new land features. The Hawaiian Islands were formed from a catastrophic event, occurring many times. Each island in the chain is composed of at least one major Volcanoe
The major that comprises the Hawaiian Islands is volcanic eruptions.
Explanation:The major that comprises the Hawaiian Islands is volcanic eruptions. The islands of the Hawaiian archipelago were formed by volcanic activity from an undersea magma source called a hotspot. This hotspot remains stationary as the tectonic plate over it continues to shift, creating new volcanoes and forming the islands.
Learn more about volcanic eruptions here:
https://brainly.com/question/38420535
#SPJ11