In the 1840 election, the Whigs adopted strategies similar to the Democrats, such as broad use of propaganda and rallies. They nominated William Henry Harrison, not Henry Clay. The Democrats put forward Martin Van Buren, not three regional candidates. Both parties avoided producing clear platforms on major public issues. Voter turnout was high at approximately 80 percent.
Explanation:The presidential election of 1840 was a significant event marking the culmination of the democratic revolution in the United States. This was a time when the second party system, characterized by the Democratic and Whig Parties, had taken hold. Large-scale presidential campaign rallies and emotional propaganda were utilized and voter turnout increased dramatically with around 80 percent of eligible voters participating, disproving the statement that voter turnout dropped.
The Whigs indeed used political tactics similar to the Democrats, including the use of propaganda and rallies. However, during this election, the Whigs didn't nominate Henry Clay; instead they nominated William Henry Harrison. The Democrats, on the other hand, did not nominate three regional candidates. Their candidate was President Martin Van Buren.
It's also worth noting that neither the Democrats nor the Whigs produced clear platforms that laid out the parties’ positions on major public issues. The issues of the time, particularly economy and westward expansion, were key talking points, but they were often discussed broadly and vaguely, with no clear policy plans.
Learn more about 1840 Election here:https://brainly.com/question/30761495
#SPJ6
Which statement best paraphrases the central idea of the first paragraph of Common Sense?Select one:a. The time has come to unite for independence.b. It is not the right time to fight for independence.c. America's future will not be greatly affected by the decisions we make now.d. The wounds that Americans suffer now will probably not be remembered by future generations.
Answer:
a. The time has come to unite for independence.
Explanation:
Thomas Paine’s common sense urged Americans to challenge the British government and ask for independence. Paine used a common language and biblical quotes so his book could reach a large group of people.
Paine also demonstrated that America had no interest in remaining tied to Britain and listed a series of advantages that the colony would have if it got independence.
Answer:
agreed
Explanation:
The eastern bloc became dominated by the soviets. true or false
Answer:
TRUE.
Explanation:
When the Red Army supported their communist government the Eastern bloc became dominated by the Soviets.
What is the main idea of taizong’s argument?
Answer:
Explanation:
Taizong’s main argument was that it is important for a country to maintain balance between military production and production of consumption goods
in order to survive and attain prosperity. Where it is necessary for a
country to be well equipped militarily, it is also important that it produces
consumption goods as well for instance food.
Answer:
A) a strong military benefits China
Explanation:
I just did the assignment.
The first charter school was opened in 1992 in
Answer:
19 thousands i believe
Explanation:
What explorer first visited the u.S. River?
Answer:
Hernando de Soto
Explanation:
The 1960 sit-in at Greensboro, North Carolina:a.was staged in one of the most notoriously racist cities of the South, where angry residents remained deeply committed to the racial divide.b.sparked similar successful demonstrations throughout the South.c.ended in a riot with ten injured.d.encountered a harsh reaction from Greensboro’s police force, which jailed the four ringleaders.e.did not end with integration of the Woolworth’s lunch counter.
Answer: the correct answer is b. sparked similar successful demonstrations throughout the South.
Explanation:
By the end of March the movement reached to 55 cities in 13 states.
How did the renaissance affect independent monarchs?
Answer:
The Renaissance affected the independent monarchs by increasing their power.
Explanation:
The Renaissance period was a time whereby there was a change from the Middle ages to the Modern day civilization. The Renaissance period was said to have taken place during the 1400s to the 1700s.
The Renaissance period was a time of advancement in artistic contents. Lots of ancient artists thrived during this period. There was also cultural rebirth and economic development during the Renaissance period.
During the Renaissance period, the powers of the independent monarchs was said to have increased because these monarchs decided to be involved in the management of taxes, armies, trade activities their allowing power to be directed or centralised towards them.
The first atom bomb was tested in which u.S. State?
Answer:
New Mexico
Explanation:
The first governing document in the united states was
Answer:
The AOC or The articles of confederation which was seen as weak in 1781
Answer:
The articles of confederation was the first governing document.
Ghandi accomplishments
Answer:
#1 HE FOUGHT AGAINST RACIAL DISCRIMINATION IN SOUTH AFRICA
#2 HIS SATYAGRAHA CAMPAIGN IN SA LED TO THE 1914 INDIAN RELIEF ACT
#3 MAHATMA GANDHI WON HIS FIRST BATTLE OF CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE IN INDIA AT CHAMPARAN
#4 HE SUCCESSFULLY LED A NON-VIOLENT TAX REVOLT IN KHEDA
#5 HE LED THE POPULAR NON-COOPERATION MOVEMENT IN EARLY 1920S
#6 MAHATMA GANDHI LED THE FAMOUS SALT MARCH TO DANDI
#7 HE LAUNCHED THE QUIT INDIA MOVEMENT IN 1942 DEMANDING END OF BRITISH RULE
#8 MAHATMA GANDHI WAS THE LEADING FIGURE RESPONSIBLE FOR INDIA ACHIEVING INDEPENDENCE
#9 HE FOUGHT AGAINST SOCIAL EVILS IN SOCIETY LIKE UNTOUCHABILITY
#10 GANDHI WAS RUNNER UP TO EINSTEIN IN TIME’S PERSON OF THE CENTURY
Explanation:
Answer:
#1 He fought against racial discrimination in South Africa.
#2 His Satyagraha campaign in SA led to the 1914 Indian Relief Act.
#3 Mahatma Gandhi won his first battle of civil disobedience in India at Champaran.
#4 He successfully led a non-violent tax revolt in Kheda.
Explanation:
What is the significance of the Tiananmen Square massacre
Identify the person who said the following: "...the form of the good is the last thing to be seen, and it is reached only with difficulty. Once one has sen it, however, one must conclude that it is the cause of all that is correct and beautiful in anything..."
Answer:
Plato
Explanation:
Form of the Good is a theory is Plato philosophic view. It is expressed in Plato's talks the' Republic', conversing within the character of Socrates. Plato offers various theories in his works but recognizes this particular theory as a greatest. This form of good that allows a philosopher to proceed to a philosopher king or queen.
One thing I refuse to do is keep quiet. The women of my generation in Latin America have been instructed that the woman should be submissive to the man, even when faced with injustices . . . Now, I understand that we need to speak out about inequalities openly. If we fail to do this we are coconspirators. I will condemn the military government openly and freely without fear. —Maria del Rosario de Cerruti
According to this quote, what was the traditional role of women in Argentina?
to fight as revolutionaries in armies
to always speak out against male authority
to keep quiet and stay out of politics
to act as accomplices to male authority
Answer:
To keep quiet and stay out of politics.
Explanation:
In this quote, we learn about the traditional role of women in Argentina. Maria del Rosario de Cerruti tells us that she refuses to keep quiet, even if that is the role that women have traditionally had in Argentina. She tells us that women in this country were expected to keep quiet, even when faced with injustices. We are also told that they were meant to be submissive to men.
Chest compressions should be initiated... 432 A) for a responsive person B) before rescue breaths (CAB)
Answer:
before rescue breaths.
Explanation:
This is because you want to determine whether or not the patient is breathing and if not making sure you are looking in the patients mouth to see if a foregin body is blocking their airways
The reforms of Gaius and Tiberius Gracchus (A) helped create a system of absolute political domination by the optimates.(B) resulted in further instability and violence as they polarized various social groups.(C) made Rome more democratic.(D) eliminated the position of tribune of the plebs.(E) were a total success, bringing some more egalitarian laws and customs.
Answer:
The correct answer is B. The reforms of Gaius and Tiberius Gracchus resulted in further instability and violence as they polarized various social groups.
Explanation:
The reforms of the Gracchus were a series of laws and proposals made in the years 133, 123 and 122 BC by the brothers Tiberius Gracchus and Gaius Gracchus. They were children of the general and statesman Tiberius Sempronius Gracchus, of the family of the Scipios. During this period, both brothers obtained the position of tribune of the plebs, from whose magistracy they could elaborate and propose a series of laws that were going to favor:
-The urban plebs.
-The italics who did not have Roman citizenship.
-The knights (equestrian order).
The laws were detrimental to the aristocratic class, the so-called optimates (word meaning "good among the good"), which constituted the majority of the Senate. Thus, two parties with different economic and political interests were organized:
-The Popular Party, headed by the Gracchus brothers; the popular ones approached the real problems that the Republic endured, posing them through the tribunes of the plebs and with the support of the military leaders whose armies were in the condition of poor citizens. They resorted to violence on multiple occasions, as did their opponents.
-Party of the optimates, constituted by the aristocratic class or citizens of the first orders. They had great interests to defend, both political and economic. They reacted violently to the new laws presented by the popular through the Gracchus brothers.
In the year 121 BC, and after multiple revolts and clashes between the two parties, the Senate authorized the consul Lucius Opimius to take any action, inside or outside the law, to end the policy followed by Gaius Gracchus. As a consequence, many of Gaius' followers were killed and Gaius himself killed himself. Such events are considered very serious in the history of Rome because according to the law, sacrilege was committed when a tribune of the plebs was touched and it was forbidden to kill any Roman citizen before he could turn to the courts.
The major obligation of the lord to the vassal was
A) Economic support and protection either militarily or through grants of land.
B) Scutage.
C) The tithe.
D) Free use of the manorial mill.
E) To arrange the marriages of the vassal's children.
Answer:
The right ansewer is A
Explanation:
It is necessary to keep in mind that the feudal lord is the maximum authority within a given area, he owns the land, money, and power over people.
In case of any attack or looting of enemies the feudal lord is in charge of organizing the army or battle group and protecting their vassals, their lands and their property.
Also this, being the owner of large tracts of land, handed them over to peasants to work for money or grain.
It is also possible that the feudal lord makes loans to peasants or artisans to buy goods necessary for production (such as horses, plows or tools for blacksmithing or cloth).
Option B and C correspond to an obligation of the vassal to the feudal lord.
Option D, the use of the mill was not always free.
and finally in option E the parents are the ones who had the power to choose marriage for their children, in many regions this marriage had to be approved by the feudal lord.
What was the significance of the Battle of Stalingrad during World War II? A. It allowed American forces to attack western Germany. B. It was the first large-scale Soviet victory. C. It knocked the Soviet Union out of the war. D. It was a major victory for the German forces.
Answer:
B. It was the first large scale Soviet victory
Answer:
It was the first large- scale in Soviet Victory.
Explanation:
What was a major consequence of the large-scale ecological changes in Africa around 60,000 and 10,000 years ago? Australopithecus africanus survived by building structures to store water and grain. Neanderthals and Cro-Magnons fought wars to control game herds. Bigger-brained hominins such as Homo sapiens survived because they adapted to changing environments. Spreading ice sheets led to the death of many animals hunted by early hominins.
Answer:
Option: Bigger-brained hominids such as Homo sapiens survived because they adapted to changing environments.
Explanation:
The large-scale ecological changes in Africa around 60,000 and 10,000 years ago led to a change in climatic transformations that were happening around that time. Homo sapiens developed practices that helped them respond to the challenges of survival. They also spread out of Africa in small groups in the farthest reaches of the Earth. It was also recorded in the expansion of the population after the migration from Africa.
Read the following historical perspectives from two modern-day historians.
Historian A: The American Revolution was caused by the American colonists’ greedy desire for more money. They were simply tired of paying their fair share of taxes to the British government, even though British troops protected the colonies during the French and Indian War! Furthermore, their claims to be fighting for freedom and liberty are totally wrong. Many of the colonists still owned slaves at the time of the Revolution! The traitorous American colonists simply wanted to steal land that was already claimed by Great Britain.
Historian B: The American Revolution was completely justified due to Great Britain’s repeated abuse of the colonists. The British passed enormous taxes on goods in the colonies, even though the Americans had no say in the British government. British soldiers were also allowed to live in American houses and eat common people’s food without paying. During the Boston Massacre, British soldiers even fired their muskets into a crowd of civilians! Under such oppressive conditions, it’s no wonder that the patriotic colonists would want to fight for the freedom and liberty of all people!
Which statement best explains why historian A mentions the issue of slavery while historian B does not?
A. Historian B wants to make the British appear to be disinterested in American affairs, including the terrible institution of slavery.
B. Historian A wants to make the colonists appear in a negative light by suggesting that they did not really believe in freedom for all.
C. Historian A is using slavery as a metaphor to argue that the American colonists have treated their British leaders poorly.
D. Historian B is making a purely economic argument, so there is no need for him to mention the institution of slavery.
Answer:
B. Historian A wants to make the colonists appear in a negative light by suggesting that they did not really believe in freedom for all.
Explanation:
The whole point of the American Revolution is that the colonists wanted to overthrow the oppressive British government who was imposing more and more taxes on them. Historian A believed that the American colonists were wrong in starting the Revolution, because they were 1) well protected by the British, and that 2) they do not act on what they want.
For example, the American Revolution was basically the 13 Colonies trying to win freedom from the "oppressive" United Kingdom. However, the historian points out that while they themselves know how it feels like to be under oppression, they do not think of their slaves as those who, like them, wanted freedom. This is a "looking-down" view, and the slaves should have been freed at the end of the Revolutionary War. This proves that the US citizens did not believe of "freedom & rights for all", but rather, only for white males.
~
Answer: the answer is B
Explanation:
Historian A wanted to make the colonist look bad to justify the Britain's.
All of the following characterize the Roman military except a. Rome required conquered communities on the Italian peninsula to provide soldiers for the Roman army every year. b. The Roman army's inability to gain clear dominance in the southeast Mediterranean against the Egyptians remained the one weakness of their empire. c. The defeat of Hannibal demonstrated that the Roman military had overwhelming advantages in resources. d. The Romans developed a war ethos that never allowed one to accept defeat. e. Roman generals could gain not only victories but enormous personal rewards.
Answer:
By now, you have learned about several major empires. Just to review, the term empire refers to a central state that exercises political control over a large amount of territory containing many diverse groups. Often, this centralized power rules from one or several capital cities. We usually refer to an empire as if it were a single unit. But, because empires are so large, they are often divided into smaller, more manageable political units, usually called provinces.
Explanation:
The statement that does not characterize the Roman military correctly is the assertion of their weakness against the Egyptians in the southeast Mediterranean. Roman military strength was marked by strategic policies and the ability to assimilate conquered communities into their military system.
The question asks which statement does not characterize the Roman military. The option that does not accurately reflect the Roman military is (b) concerning their dominance in the southeast Mediterranean against the Egyptians. While the Roman military had challenges, the statement that the inability to gain clear dominance over the Egyptians was a weakness is incorrect. The Roman military's actual strength was in adopting effective strategies, such as divide and conquer, negotiating from strength, and transforming enemies into allies.
Roman military policy also included assimilating conquered communities and requiring them to provide soldiers. The defeat of Hannibal in the Second Punic War underlined Rome's vast resources, and Roman generals could indeed gain significant personal rewards from their conquests. Additionally, the Romans had a war ethos that did not accept defeat readily, and they invested heavily in military conquests and maintaining a strong presence on their frontiers. Even after the Republican period when soldiering became a career, soldiers remained loyal to generals who offered tangible rewards, highlighting the professional rather than volunteer nature of the army.
What condition in traditional Africa made it easier for Europeans to trade for slaves on that continent?
A)Many African societies, such as the Songhai and the Ashanti, used slave labor.
B)Continual warfare ensured a constant supply of captives to be sold as slaves.
C)Frequent famines made slavery an alternative to starvation for many people.
D)Villagers had no individual rights in the medieval African kingdoms.
Answer:
A) Many African societies, such as the Songhai and the Ashanti, used slave labor
Explanation:
The slavery in Africa was a common thing, and every stronger empire was using labor force. The people that lost in war were taken as slaves, and they were used as free labor force. The Europeans saw the potential of the African slaves for their large plantations in the Americas, so they started to buy them from the African kingdoms, giving them weapons and other goods they needed in return. Quickly the slave trade developed, and the African kingdoms were using the subjucated people to sell them as slaves, so both sides benefited, apart from the slaves of course.
Final answer:
Continual warfare in traditional African societies provided a steady supply of captives for slave trade with Europeans, facilitating transactions in exchange for European goods. Option B is correct.
Explanation:
The condition in traditional Africa that made it easier for Europeans to trade for slaves on that continent was due to the fact that continual warfare ensured a constant supply of captives to be sold as slaves. The frequent conflicts between different kingdoms and groups led to a large number of war captives who could be traded. In addition, certain African societies, such as the Songhai and Ashanti, indeed used slave labor, thereby normalizing the concept of slavery within these cultures. However, it was the constant state of conflict that most facilitated the Europeans' trade in slaves, enabling them to acquire captives in exchange for goods such as firearms, alcohol, and textiles. Option B is correct.
Why did some Americans support aid for France during the French Revolution? (A) They saw it as a way to insult Great Britain and solidify their own principles.(B) They saw it as an opportunity to develop a permanent alliance with France. (C) They saw it as important to prevent Great Britain’s interference in the event. (D) They saw it as an obligation for France’s support during their own revolution.
Answer: D. They saw it as an obligation for France’s support during their own revolution.
Explanation: The French had offered aid during the Revolutionary War and their revolution seemed to embody the ideals of the American Revolution. The French foreign minister refused to negotiate with American representatives and demanded a bribe and a loan.
During the French Revolution, some Americans supported aiding France as a reciprocation for the support received during the American Revolution, as an opposition to Great Britain's potential interference, and as a method to forge a strategic alliance with France.
Explanation:During the French Revolution, some Americans supported aid for France due to a variety of motivations. One common reason was that they viewed it as an obligation given France's vital support during the American Revolution (Option D). In this sense, it was seen as a way to reciprocate the help they had received.
Another prevailing sentiment was the idea of supporting a fellow republic fighting for principles similar to those that underpinned the United States, such as democracy and liberty. Some Americans also saw aiding France as a strategic move to prevent Great Britain's interference in revolutionary affairs, thus weakening a potential adversary (Option C).
Finally, others perceived it as an opportunity to develop a permanent alliance with France, which could offer the US a strong partner in Europe (Option B). However, the stance towards providing aid was not unanimous, sparking heated debates within the US political sphere.
Learn more about French Revolution here:https://brainly.com/question/2365723
#SPJ6
QUESTION 18
Why were the reaper and the steel plow important for nineteenth-century agriculture?
They reduced yields but cut labor costs.
They made farming of new crops in the East possible.
They made harvests slower but less expensive.
They allowed midwestern farmers to raise and maintain production.
Which of the following correctly matches an immigrant group with the region in which it primarily settled in the 1800s?
Chinese – Texas
Scandinavians – California
Italians – the Dakotas
Eastern European Jews – New York City
Answer:
They allowed farmers in the Midwest to increase and maintain production.
Explanation:The reaper is a tool that is used by farmers to harvest the crops that the farmers planted as soon as they became ripe. Steel plow farming is a tool that's used to break up the soils so it can be used for planting.
Both of these tools improve the productivity of the farmers and help them in fulfilling the orders that they got in time.
What was significance of the Marbury v. Madison Supreme Court case?
A. It established that the Supreme Court could declare acts of Congress unconstitutional.
B. Justice Marshall ruled Marbury will, by law, be forced to his commision.
C. It established that the president could not appoint midnight judges.
D. It established that the power of the Supreme Court was greater than the other government branches.
Answer:
A. It established that the Supreme Court could declare acts of Congress unconstitutional.
BRAINLIEST PLEASE
Answer:
It established the idea that only the Supreme Court can determine what is constitutional.
It strengthened the Supreme Court’s position as a co-equal branch of the government.
Explanation:
In its 2012 platform, the Democratic Party argued that marriage should be limited to
one man and one woman.
True
False
Answer: False
Explanation: In its 2012 platform, the Democratic Party provided support for same-sex marriage, and the equalization of their rights. It was the first official, support for gay marriage, leaving the freedom of choice to church communities and other religious organizations how to treat same-sex marriage. It also meant supporting movements and activists working to ensure equal rights for same-sex marriage.
At the end of World War II, how did nations around the world help Jewish refugees who were left without homes?
Many nations helped the refugees rebuild their home towns.
Many nations admitted large amounts of Jewish refugees.
Jewish refugees were given a homeland in Palestine.
Many Jewish refugees settled in Arab countries.
Answer:
Jewish refugees were given a homeland in Palestine, is the correct answer.
After the world war, Jewish people were given a homeland in Palestine. The United Kingdom was the first world power to who endorsed the establishment of Palestine in 1917 at the Balfour Declaration. The large scale migration of Jews began in 1882, but after in 1948 at least 3 million Jews moved to Israel. In present-day Israel and the neighboring area contain 43 percent of the Jewish population. The migration of Jewish people to Jerusalem is known as Aliyah(The act of going up towards Jerusalem).
Answer:
Jewish refugees were given a homeland in Palestine.
Explanation:
The world felt indebted to the Jewish people just after World War II. Not only was it revealed that the Holocaust had consigned the death of 6 million Jews in Nazi concentration camps, but that those who had survived did not have a homeland to return to, which is why on May 14, 1948, Israel managed to establish itself as a legitimate state in the territory that was previously the British Mandate of Palestine.
Which statement best explains the effect of the US occupation of Japan? Answer: The United States helped Japan become a democratic country with a strong economy.
Answer:
The US helped Japan become a democratic country with a strong economy
Explanation:
Answer: Japanese leaders in World War II remained in power (grad point)
Explanation:
The explosion of Mexico City’s population beginning in the 1960s was the result of: a) municipal annexation. b) increasing birth rates. c) international migration. d)internal migration.
Answer: d) Internal migration.
Explanation:
Mexico City had been the ultimate goal for Mexican internal migration, mainly because of the economic opportunities and the developed infrastructure in education, culture, and health. The 1960s saw the greatest increase in the city´s population in its entire history, still, mostly because of in-migration. Nevertheless, the city’s immigration eventually decreased, getting a negative net migration between 1985 and 1990.
Who shot and mortally wounded president james a. Garfield?
Answer:
charles j. guiteau
Explanation:
he was offended by the Garfield administration's rejection of his applications to serve Vienne or Paris that he decided to kill him.
Answer:
Charles Guiteau
Explanation:
what does the biography take away from the autobiography? How does autobiographical and biographical narratives help historians?
1. The biography and the autobiography have lot of things in common, but they also have few differences. The biggest and most important difference between the two is that the biography is written for someone by someone else, while the autobiography is written by person himself/herself it is about. This leads us to say that the biography is taking away the personal opinion and person expressions of the person whose life is described, as it only offers the perspective from the other people, or a single person.
2. The biography and the autobiography are of great help for the historians. The biography offers the view of a particular person for the person in question, be it the action that person has done, the physical appearance, the character etc. The autobiography, on the other hand, gives clues about how the person in question has viewed himself/herself, and how that person was seeing the world and their own actions and behavior. Both combined, give a nice perspective from two sides, which gives clues about the real historical events.