Final answer:
Napoleon believed that conquering more territory was essential for France's protection, demonstrating this through his extensive military campaigns aimed at expanding the French Empire and securing its dominance in Europe.
Explanation:
Napoleon believed that the only way to protect France was to conquer more territory. His military campaigns and the expansion of the French Empire were driven by the belief that France's security and dominance in Europe could only be guaranteed through territorial acquisition.
Napoleon's aspirations were not just limited to the neighboring states but extended as far as Russia, aiming to recreate a vast empire reminiscent of the ancient Romans.
This strategy included defeating powerful adversaries, creating puppet states governed by his relatives, and spreading the revolutionary ideals, albeit under his autocratic rule.
Despite his ultimate goal of peace and stability within Europe under French hegemony, it was through continuous conquest and the broadening of France's borders that Napoleon sought to achieve this.
The most accurate reflection of Napoleon's belief in protecting France is the conquest of more territory, which aligns with his actions and the historical context of his reign. The correct answer is a) conquer more territory.
Napoleon Bonaparte is known for his military campaigns and the expansion of French territory during his rule.
His strategy was based on the idea that by controlling neighboring regions and creating a buffer zone, he could protect France from external threats.
This approach involved conquering territories and establishing French dominance across Europe.
Option b) refers to his authoritarian rule and the creation of alliances, but it does not directly address the protection of France through territorial expansion.
Option c) is incorrect because Napoleon actually ended the Bourbon monarchy when he took power and established the French Empire, rather than creating a new monarchy.
Option d) is not entirely accurate as Napoleon's goal was not solely to destroy nations but rather to subdue them and incorporate them into his empire or create satellite states that would be sympathetic to French interests, thereby protecting France indirectly.
Therefore, the most accurate reflection of Napoleon's belief in protecting France is through the conquest of more territory, which aligns with his actions and the historical context of his reign.
plz plz plz help WILL MARK BRAINLIEST!!
Which answer best defines the civic virtue "individual rights"?
Individual rights means something is beneficial to an entire group.
Individual rights include protection of life, health, liberty, and property.
Individual rights means to argue a point based on fact and respect others' views.
Individual rights means respect for a variety of opinions, cultures, and religious beliefs.
Which action associated with the United States' "return to normalcy" is described below? In 1921, a treaty was established between the United States, France, England, Italy, and Japan agreeing to a ten-year ban on building new military ships or aircraft carriers.
A) Anti-Militarization Peace Treaty
B) Versailles Conference
C) League of Nations Pact
D) Washington Disarmament Conference
The correct answer is D.
The Washington Disarmament Conference was a military conference organized by US President Harding in 1921. It was called outside the mechanisms of the League of Nations, and nine nations were invited to participate: US, China, Japan, Britain, France, Italy, Belgium, Portugal and Netherlands. Russia and Germany were not invited.
For the first time in history, the purpouse of the meeting was to establish a limitation on weapons' production.
Women met in seneca falls, new york in 1848 to discuss the role of women in society. they created a document based on:
THE ANSWER IS tHE dECLARATION OF iNDEPENDENCE aPEX
Answer: The Declaration of Independence.
Which of these terms describes Benito Mussolini’s form of government?
totalitarian
anarchist
imperialist
socialist
The medici family was important to the development of the renaissance because its members were
Answer:
The Medici family was important to the development of the Renaissance because its members were rich bankers that sponsored several artists.
Explanation:
The Medici family was a Florentine great family from the 13th to the 18th century. The family includes three popes, several rulers of Florence and Tuscany, and later members of the French Royal House. The lineage came from humble conditions, but in the 15th century it became the most influential family in Florence and later officially ruled the city.
The wealthiest and most well-known members of the Medici family for their lifetime careers and possessions earned their wealth especially in the fabric trade and banking. The Medici Bank was one of the most respected and successful in Europe. Medici had banking activities in Italy, Geneva, London and Bruges in Flanders. However, most of the activities took place in Italy.
The Medici family had close links with many of the great Renaissance thinkers and artists such as Filippo Brunelleschi, Donatello, Sandro Botticelli, Leonardo da Vinci, Michelangelo, Giorgio Vasari and Galileo Galilei. They had all either lived with them, worked for them, attended daily dinner parties with them, or been supported by the Medici family.
"It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is. Those who apply the rule to particular cases, must of necessity expound and interpret that rule. If two laws conflict with each other, the courts must decide on the operation of each." —Chief Justice John Marshall, 1803 Which conclusion can be drawn from this excerpt of the Supreme Court's decision in Marbury v. Madison? A) The jurisdiction granted to the judicial branch is limited to federal and constitutional laws. B) This decision established the concept of judicial review and strengthened the role of the Judicial branch. C) This decision gave Congress the authority to charter the National Bank, which angered the Anti-Federalists. D) This decision strengthened the "Elastic Clause" of the U.S. Constitution and expanded the powers of Congress.
What law was upheld as constitutional in the supreme court case of schenck v. united states answers?
The Espionage Act of 1917 was upheld as constitutional in the Supreme Court case of Scheck v. United States.
Further Explanations:
Schenck versus the United States was a legal case of the United States Supreme Court of which ruling was delivered on 3rd March 1919. The ruling stated that the “Freedom of Speech” defense included in the Constitution as per the First Amendment can be regulated if the uttered word or printed statements bounds to create a threat in the society. In another term, we can say that the ruling defended that the Espionage act of 1917 was constitutional.
The Espionage Act was a national law implemented on 15th June 1917 in congress, after the involvement of the United States in the First World War. It was framed to outlaw prying of military operations during the commencement of the war. It was further prolonged by the “Sedation act of 1918” that revised the act prohibiting any Speech contrary to the administration. It also outlawed the usage of abusive words, un-trust worthiness, scandalous and profane, violating to which was condemned to 20 years imprisonment or death sentence.
Learn more
In a parliamentary system of representative democracy, the prime minister is appointed by the monarch. is elected by representatives chosen by the people. is the leader of the party that won the most seats in parliament. is elected directly by the people.?https://brainly.com/question/477236 What was the charge of the 1807 indictment by the man who was chosen as vice president on February 17, 1801, by the House of Representatives after thirty-six ballots?https://brainly.com/question/8775340 The most influential and powerful members of a political party are most likely found? https://brainly.com/question/11032918
Answer Details
Grade: High school
Subject: US History
Chapter: The Espionage act
Keywords:
Espionage act, United States, Legislature, World War, the Enemy Act, Defense Secret Act, Prohibition, Sedation act of 1918, language, disloyalty, scurrilous and profane
True or False? Because of the conquests of King Cyrus, Persia had control of Athens
Answer: False
Explanation: Because of the conquests of King Cyrus, Persia had control of Athens.
I believe in the existence of a great, immortal, immutable principle of natural law...which proves the absolute right to an education of every human being that comes into the world; and which, of course, proves the correlative duty of every government to see that the means of that education are provided for all.... Massachusetts is parental in her government. More and more, as year after year rolls by, she seeks to substitute prevention for remedy, and rewards for penalties. She strives to make industry the antidote to poverty, and to counterwork the progress of vice and crime by the diffusion of knowledge and the culture of virtuous principles." - Horace Mann, 1846 to the Massachusetts Legislature Using the passage from the speech given by Horace Mann, which is NOT a reason he gives for providing public education? A) it is a natural right B) it will prevent poverty C) it will instill virtue D) it will help catch criminals
The correct answer is D. IT WILL HELP CATCH CRIMINALS
who is Abraham Lincoln
Describe the purpose of regular and fair elections in a democracy. Then explain how much U.S elections at the local, state, and federal level are similar in terms of district organization, how they are won, and the balloting system used.
From 1910 to 1930, many African Americans moved from the South to the North in a trend known as the Great Migration. One of the main causes of this move was
The policy of the US government toward the Indians in the period immediately prior to the Civil War was to A) drive them out of the country and into Canada. B) move the Indian population on to reservations. C) grant citizenship and voting rights to Indians. D) require the education of Indian children in public schools.
The answer is B) move the Indian population on to reservations. (I know this is a bit late but I'm just trying to acquire points.)
The people who formed a five-nation confederacy in the Northeast were whom?
A. Iroquois
B. Cherokee
C. Zuni
D. Aleut
Answer:
A. Iroquois
Explanation:
Although there had been heretics and reformers in the catholic church before martin luther, none had threatened the unity of the church. what were the social, economic, and political conditions in germany that contributed to the enormous success of lutheranism
Should all urban communities, villages, towns, and cities have one type of local government? Why or why not?
No, not all urban communities should have one type of local government because different types of municipalities have evolved with varying needs and administrative requirements. The presence of different models such as the mayor-council system and council-manager system reflects the diverse conditions and challenges faced by municipalities. A single governance model is not feasible due to the distinct challenges and economies of scale in densely populated areas.
Explanation:The question of whether all urban communities, including villages, towns, and cities, should have one type of local government is complex due to the diverse needs and conditions of various municipalities. Each municipality, governed by city, town, or borough governments, receives its authority from the state and has a significant impact on its citizens' daily lives. Given that there are nearly 19,500 municipal governments and approximately 16,500 township governments in the United States, it becomes evident that a single governance model may not fit all. The vast majority of municipal governments operate using either a mayor-council system or a council-manager system, depending on what best suits local needs.
Different types of municipalities, like hamlets, villages, towns, and cities, have evolved due to the population's transition from farming to specialized nonfarming jobs, requiring different levels of administration and public services. Disputes and the need for law enforcement necessitated the creation of localized governments. Furthermore, the concept of one giant city is impractical due to diseconomies of scale, such as traffic congestion, pollution, and crime, which can offset the benefits of economies of scale in densely populated urban areas.
Thus, considering the varied nature and size of communities as well as their unique challenges and advantages, it's not feasible for all urban communities to have one type of local government. The structure and purpose of municipal and county governments are crafted to address specific local issues, which underscores the importance of tailored governance models for different communities.
The debate on whether all urban communities should have one type of local government is complex. Local government structures vary widely to meet the specific needs and challenges of different communities. A one-size-fits-all approach may overlook the unique dynamics and necessities of each urban area, from hamlets to metropolises.
Explanation:Whether all urban communities, villages, towns, and cities should have one type of local government is a matter of debate. The structure of local government can greatly affect citizens' lives, as municipalities have elected mayors or can be managed by appointed city managers. Municipal and county governments differ in structure and purpose, which is reflected in their varying needs and the services they provide. The idea of a single type of local government overseeing different urban forms ignores the unique challenges and requirements of each area, from hamlets and villages to cities and metropolises.
Considering that the United States consists of one national government, 50 state governments, and approximately 85,000 local governments, there is a high degree of diversity in how these entities are organized. Distinct geographies, economies, and community sizes necessitate different forms of governance. As cities and towns have evolved, the need for specialized administrators and public servants has increased, creating the need for varied local governments tailored to the specific circumstances and needs of each community.
The concept of economies of scale can apply to urban planning as well. While cities offer economic advantages, when they grow too large, negative factors such as traffic congestion, pollution, and crime may offset the benefits. These diseconomies suggest that a one-size-fits-all approach to local government may not be feasible or beneficial for all communities.
How did opinions differ over how to end the institution of slavery?
Opinions varied considerably on how to end slavery in the 19th century United States. Northern elites and middle class were largely against it, although abolitionists varied in their views between advocating for total abolition to colonization. In contrast, the South defended slavery as essential for economy and property rights.
Explanation:Opinions on how to end the institution of slavery differed greatly among different groups in the United States during the 19th century. Northern business elites had mixed feelings due to their economic ties to slave labor, but overall, more individuals, especially among the middle class, saw it as an immoral institution and worked to end it. The issue of slavery became more contentious with the western expansion of the U.S., sparking fears of the South dominating the North politically and the deprivation of opportunities for small farmers in the new territories.
Abolitionists were the main activists working to end slavery, arguing against its immorality and conflict with the nation's values. However, opinions differed even within the anti-slavery crowds—while some strived for racial equality, others supported colonization, settling freed slaves in Africa. Furthermore, there was a fear among antislavery advocates about white workers having to compete with slave labor, thereby demeaning white labor.
The southern states, whose economy heavily relied on the institution of slavery, resolved to defend it at any cost. The proponents of slavery argued that prohibiting it would violate American property rights. As the abolitionists continued their campaigns, the southerners began promoting the idea that slavery was not merely a necessary evil, but a positive good for the U.S.
Learn more about Slavery Abolition here:https://brainly.com/question/30675047
#SPJ11
What caused many american settlers to go to california in 1849?
What is a negative externality of a cell phone?
an inability to use it in some places, such as tunnels
a conversation that annoys people nearby
its size
it needs to be charged
Answer:
a conversation that annoys people nearby
Explanation:
A negative externality exists when the production or consumption of a product results in a cost to a third party. Air and noise pollution are commonly cited examples of negative externalities.
Identify all of the British taxation policies of the 1760s. Check all of the boxes that apply.
)Townshend Acts
)Intolerable Acts
)Sugar Act
)Stamp Act
Answer:
Stamp Act
Sugar Act
Townshend Acts
Explanation:
Stamp Act, Sugar Act and Townshend Acts are all of the British taxation policies of the 1760s. Hence, options A, C and D are correct.
What is Sugar Act?The Sugar Act, also known as the Plantation Act or Revenue Act in American colonial history, was passed by the British Crown in 1764. In order to pay for the extended British Empire responsibilities following the French and Indian War, it sought to stop the smuggling of sugar and molasses from the French and Dutch West Indies and raise taxes.
The new Sugar Act, approved on April 5, 1764, and put into effect on September 29 prohibited the importation of any foreign rum and decreased the tax on foreign molasses from 6 to 3 pence per gallon while maintaining a high duty on foreign refined sugar.
Thus, options A, C and D are correct.
For more details about Sugar Act, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/1686110
#SPJ2
Is an organization like the Department of Homeland Security more of a protection for the American people or a potential threat to their liberties? Why?
That's a challenging essay question. There are arguments to be made from both sides, and the core of the argument is as old as the ideas of English philosophers Thomas Hobbes and John Locke.
Thomas Hobbes believed that the social contract essentially meant that people will exchange some of their individual freedoms for common security. His treatise, Leviathan (1651) supported a strong central government for the sake of a country's security and stability. So if Hobbes were answering your question,m he'd say that the Department of Homeland Security is proper and needed in order to keep citizens safe.
John Locke's arguments in his Second Treatise on Civil Government (1689) were more focused on the rights of all persons and the protection of those rights in a society. His view of the social contract saw the emphasis as benefiting all persons in their rights to life, liberty and property. So Locke might look with a skeptical eye at the Department of Homeland Security, if it was shown to be infringing on individuals' rights and liberties.
How was the war of 1812 both a success and a failure for americans?
Like the declaration of independence, the u.s. constitution refers to our fundamental rights as "unalienable" rights. a. true b. false
What are the two natural boundaries that protected the harappan civilization from invaders?
To the north of the Indus Valley were only mountains, while to the west was a sizable desert. These organic defenses contributed to the civilization's ability to repel invaders.
What was Indus Valley civilization?The first known urban culture on the Indian subcontinent is the Indus civilization, often known as the Indus valley civilization or the Harappan civilization.
Although the southern sites may have persisted later into the second millennium BCE, the civilization's nuclear dates appear to be between 250 to 1700 BCE. The Indus civilization was the largest of the three early civilizations in the world.
First discovered in 1921 at Harappa in the Punjab region, the civilisation was later discovered in 1922 at Mohenjo-Daro, close to the Indus River in the Sindh region.
Both locations are in the current Pakistani provinces of Sindh and Punjab. In 1980, Mohenjo-remains daro's were listed as a UNESCO World Heritage site.
In addition to the two big cities of Harappa and Mohenjo-Daro, the Indus civilization is known to have had more than 100 towns and villages, many of which were quite small.
The two cities' extraordinary size suggests political centralization, either in two huge states or in a single great empire with alternate capitals, a practice with precedents in Indian history. The two cities were each maybe once roughly one mile square in total dimensions.
Learn more about Indus Valley civilization, here
https://brainly.com/question/3373105
#SPJ5
What U.S policies signaled a shift away from the policy of neutrality?
U.S. policies like Lend-Lease, the Destroyers for Bases Agreement, and embargoes on Japan signaled a shift from neutrality.
Several U.S. policies have marked shifts away from a stance of neutrality:
1. Lend-Lease Act (1941):This allowed the U.S. to provide military aid to foreign nations during World War II, primarily the Allied powers, without direct involvement in the conflict.
2. Destroyers for Bases Agreement (1940): This arrangement saw the U.S. exchanging naval destroyers with the United Kingdom in return for land rights on British possessions in the Caribbean and Newfoundland, signaling increasing support for Allied powers before U.S. entry into World War II.
3. Atlantic Charter (1941): A joint declaration by the U.S. and the UK, outlining their goals for the post-war world. While not an official declaration of war, it demonstrated U.S. commitment to Allied principles and opposition to Axis aggression.
4. Embargo on Japan (1940-1941): The U.S. imposed embargoes on exports of oil and other resources to Japan in response to its expansionist actions in Asia, culminating in Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor and the subsequent entry of the U.S. into World War II.
These policies reflect a departure from strict neutrality and a growing involvement in global affairs, particularly in the context of World War II.
Why did FDR sign the Social Security Act in 1935 as a part of the second New Deal?
Question 1 options:
Roosevelt was concerned that the banking industry would enter in to another collapse with out the Social Security Act
Roosevelt believed senior citizens did not benefit from the First New Deal
Roosevelt felt that securing the social aspects of society would make people more likely to support the Allies in WW2
Roosevelt needed to include protections to the young and healthy workers who were fueling the economic turnaround
Franklin Delano Roosevelt signed the Social Security Act in 1935 as a part of the Second New Deal because he believed that senior citizens did not benefit from the First New Deal.
The act was enacted in the context of the New Deal promoted by President Franklin D. Roosevelt and gave a definitive character to local measures of assistance to elderly people who had become seriously impoverished as a result of the Great Depression.
The levels of poverty and unemployment had increased greatly in the United States as a result of the Great Depression, and a group that was particularly disadvantaged was elderly citizens, for whom "social insurance" of a very basic level was created. However, the New Deal encouraged these social benefit policies to be covered by a federal law designed to protect the elderly, the unemployed, widows, and orphans.
The new law established a social protection system at the federal level: retirement for people over 65 years old, insurance against unemployment and various aids for the disabled, but the diseases and disability were not covered. The blind and handicapped children received grants financed by the Federal Government. Progressively, the system covered a wider part of the population, particularly thanks to the 1939 and 1950 amendments, but initially it was restricted to the limits initially imposed by Roosevelt.
Actually this "Social Security" was created as a public pension system based on the funded distribution, that is, the contributions of active workers served to finance the costs of recipients of aid in the future, without accumulating notable financial reserves of the contributors. Pensions began to be paid from the beneficiary's retirement age.
Why was Rosa parks honored at the march on Washington?
What did most mexican immigrants do once they arrived in the united states? answere?
They moved to the west and worked on ranches and farms.
Hope this helps
why did latin american nations have difficulty implementing democracies
How many more metric tons of coal were produced in 1938 than in 1928
To find out how many more metric tons of coal were produced in 1938 than in 1928, we can use the U.S. Energy Information Administration graph in Figure 1 to estimate the difference.
Explanation:To find out how many more metric tons of coal were produced in 1938 than in 1928, we need to subtract the amount of coal produced in 1928 from the amount produced in 1938.
We don't have the exact data for coal production in 1928 and 1938, but we can use the information from the U.S. Energy Information Administration graph shown in Figure 1 to estimate the difference. From the graph, we can see that coal production increased from 1950 to 1980, so it is reasonable to assume that the production in 1938 was higher than in 1928.
Therefore, we can conclude that more metric tons of coal were produced in 1938 than in 1928, but we cannot determine the exact difference without more specific data.