Answer:
133g
Explanation:
If one litre of ocean water contains 35.06g of salt, all we have to to to get the mass of salt in 3.79 L of ocean water is multiply 35.06g/L by 3.79 L.
35.06g/L × 3.79 L = 133g
The amount of salt in 3.79 L of ocean water can be found by multiplying the volume of the water by the constant ratio of 35.06 g of salt per liter. This gives 132.8774 grams, which when we round to 4 significant figures is equivalent to 132.9 g.
Explanation:To find the amount of salt in 3.79 L of ocean water, we use the given ratio of salt to water: 1 liter of ocean water contains 35.06 grams of salt. So to find the amount of salt in any given volume of ocean water, we just multiply the volume (in liters) by this constant ratio of 35.06 grams of salt per liter.
Applying this to the volume of 3.79 L we get: 3.79 L * 35.06 g/L = 132.8774 grams. Since we should express our answer using the correct number of significant figures (4 in this case, because there are 4 significant figures in the 3.79 L volume measurement), the answer is rounded to 132.9 g.
Learn more about Salinity Calculation here:https://brainly.com/question/30263382
#SPJ2
A slice of Swiss cheese contains 47 mg of sodium. (a) What is this mass in grams? .047 (b) What is this mass in ounces? (16 oz = 453.6 g) 0.0016 X (c) What is this mass in pounds? (1 lb 453.6 g) 0.0001x
Based on conversion ratios, 47 mg of sodium would be:
a. 0.047 grams. b. 0.00166 ounces.c. 0.000104 pounds.Mass in grams1g is 1,000 grams.
47 mg would be:
= 0.47 / 1,000
= 0.047 grams
Mass in Ounces16 ounces is 453.6 grams so 0.047 grams would be:
= (0.047 x 16) / 453.6
= 0.00166 ounces.
Mass in Pounds1 pound is 453.6 grams so 0.047 grams would be:
= 0.047 / 453.6
= 0.000104 pounds
Find out more on conversion rates at https://brainly.com/question/1107267.
To convert 47 mg of sodium to grams, divide by 1000. To convert grams to ounces, use the conversion factor 1 oz = 28.35 g. To convert grams to pounds, use the conversion factor 1 lb = 453.6 g.
Explanation:To convert 47 mg to grams, divide by 1000:
47 mg = 47/1000 = 0.047 grams
To convert grams to ounces, use the conversion factor:
0.047 g x (1 oz/28.35 g) = 0.00166 oz
To convert grams to pounds, use the conversion factor:
0.047 g x (1 lb/453.6 g) = 0.0001035 lb
what is conjugate base for h20?
Answer:
OH-
Explanation:
H2O can act as base or acid.
When H2O acts as a base the conjugate acid is H3O+
When H2O acts as an acid the conjugate base is OH-
Many buffers are polyprotic, such as carbonic acid. Bicarbonate (HCO3) has a pKa of 10.33; while Carbonic acid (HCO3) has a pKa of 6.35. Use the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation to mathematically determine which form of this buffer predominates at pH 7.4 (homeostasis pH of blood). Besides your mathematical answer, state the form that predominates too.
Answer:
Carbonic acid/bicarbonate; bicarbonate
Explanation:
H₂CO₃ + H₂O ⇌ H₃O⁺ + HCO₃⁻; pKₐ₁ = 6.35
HCO₃⁻ + H₂O ⇌ H₃O⁺ + CO₃²⁻; pKₐ₂ = 10.33
[tex]\text{pH}& = &\text{pK}_{\text{a}} + \log\dfrac{[\text{A}^{-}]}{\text{[HA]}}\\\\7.4 & = &\text{pK}_{\text{a}} + \log\dfrac{[\text{A}^{-}]}{\text{[HA]}}[/tex]
The best buffer is one for which pKₐ ≈ pH.
6.35 is closer to 7.4, so the carbonic acid/bicarbonate form of the buffer predominates
The pH of the blood is higher (more basic) than the pKₐ of carbonic acid, so its basic form (bicarbonate, HCO₃⁻) predominates.
Final answer:
The bicarbonate form of carbonic acid predominates in the buffer system at pH 7.4.
Explanation:
The Henderson-Hasselbalch equation is used to determine the pH of a buffer solution. In this case, we are trying to determine which form of the carbonic acid buffer predominates at pH 7.4, which is the homeostasis pH of the blood.
The Henderson-Hasselbalch equation is:
pH = pKa + log ([base] / [acid])
Given that the pKa of carbonic acid is 6.35, we can plug in the values to calculate:
pH = 6.35 + log (0.024 / 0.0012)
Simplifying the equation, we get:
pH = 6.35 + log (20)
pH = 6.35 + 1.3010
pH = 7.65
So, at pH 7.4, the bicarbonate (HCO3-) form of carbonic acid predominates in the buffer system.
Write a balanced half-reaction for the reduction of permanganate ion (Mno) to manganese ion Mn?) in acidic aqueous solution. Be sure to add physical state symbols where appropriate. 0-0 Cb X 5 2
The reduction of permanganate ion to manganese ion in acidic solution is represented by the balanced half-reaction: MnO₄⁻(aq) + 8H⁺(aq) + 5e⁻ → Mn²⁺(aq) + 4H₂O(l). It shows the permanganate ion gaining 5 electrons to become a manganese(II) ion, with the protons reacting with permanganate to form water.
Explanation:The reduction of the permanganate ion (MnO⁴⁻) to the manganese(II) ion (Mn²⁺) in acidic solution can be illustrated with the following balanced half-reaction:
MnO₄⁻(aq) + 8H⁺(aq) + 5e⁻ → Mn²⁺(aq) + 4H₂O(l)
This equation indicates that the permanganate ion gains 5 electrons (is reduced) in an acidic solution to result in a manganese(II) ion. The 8 protons react with permanganate to form 4 molecules of water, which is also reflected in the equation.
Learn more about Reduction of Permanganate Ion here:https://brainly.com/question/30572418
#SPJ3
The reduction half-reaction for permanganate to manganese ion in an acidic solution is MnO4- + 8H+ + 5e- → Mn2+ + 4H2O(l), where oxygen and hydrogen are balanced by adding water and hydrogen ions, respectively, and the charge is balanced by adding electrons.
Explanation:To write a balanced half-reaction for the reduction of the permanganate ion (MnO4-) to manganese ion (Mn2+) in an acidic aqueous solution, we start with the half-reaction:
MnO4- + 8H+ + 5e- → Mn2+ + 4H2O(l)
In this balanced equation, the oxygen atoms are balanced by adding water molecules (H2O) to the right side, and the hydrogen atoms are balanced by adding hydrogen ions (H+) to the left side. Additionally, 5 electrons (5e^-) are added to the left side to ensure that the overall charge is balanced between the reactant and product sides of the equation.
Learn more about Redox Reaction here:https://brainly.com/question/13978139
#SPJ3
Conversion of mass to moles A continuous feed to a separation unit is 1,000 kg/h of 45 wt% methanol and 55 wt% water, whose molecular weights are 32 and 18, respectively. Compute: (a) feed rate in lbmol/h, and (b) composition in mole fractions.
Answer:
Total feed rate = 98.3 lbmol/h
methanol mole fraction = 0.315
water mole fraction = 0.685
Explanation:
First of all, it is needed to calculate the feed mass of methanol and water in kg/h.
For methanol:
[tex]m_{methanol} = m\%wt_{methanol}/100 = (1000kg/h)(45\%)/100[/tex]
[tex]m_{methanol} = 450kg/h[/tex]
For water:
[tex]m_{water} = m\%wt_{water}/100 = (1000kg/h)(55\%)/100[/tex]
[tex]m_{water} = 550 kg/h[/tex]
Now, change from mass units (kg/h) to moles units (kmol/h and lbmol/h) using simple conversion factors:
For methanol:
[tex]n_{methanol} = (450\frac{kg}{h})(\frac{1 kmol}{32 kg} )[/tex]
[tex]n_{methanol} = 14.1kmol/h[/tex]
For water:
[tex]n_{water} = (550\frac{kg}{h})(\frac{1 kmol}{18 kg} )[/tex]
[tex]n_{water} = 30.6kmol/h[/tex]
Change units from kmol/h to lbmol/h
For methanol:
[tex]n_{methanol} = (14.1\frac{kmol}{h})(\frac{1 lbmol}{0.454 kmol} )[/tex]
[tex]n_{methanol} = 31.0 lbmol/h[/tex]
For water:
[tex]n_{water} = (30.6\frac{kg}{h})(\frac{1 lbmol}{0.454 kmol} )[/tex]
[tex]n_{water} = 67.3 lbmol/h[/tex]
Sum moles of methanol and water in lbmol/h to compute the total feed rate:
[tex]n = 31.0 lbmol/h + 67.3 lbmol/h[/tex]
[tex]n = 98.3 lbmol/h[/tex]
Divide both methanol and water moles feed rates by total feed rate:
For methanol:
[tex]X_{methanol} = \frac{31.0 lbmol/h}{98.3 lbmol/h}[/tex]
[tex]X_{methanol} = 0.315[/tex]
For water:
[tex][X_{water} = \frac{67.3 lbmol/h}{98.3 lbmol/h}[/tex]
[tex]X_{water} = 0.685[/tex]
End
Round 129.752416 to the requested number of significant figure a. 3 significant figures c. 6 significant figures_22 b. 4 significant figures d. 7 significant figures
To round 129.752416 to the requested number of significant figures:
- For 3 significant figures, round down to 129.7.
- For 4 significant figures, round up to 129.8.
- For 6 and 7 significant figures, keep the given digits.
To round 129.752416 to the requested number of significant figures:
For 3 significant figures, we look at the digit next to the third significant figure. If it is 5 or greater, we round up, otherwise, we round down. In this case, the digit next to the third significant figure is 2, which is less than 5, so the rounded number is 129.7.For 4 significant figures, we follow the same process as before but include the digit next to the fourth significant figure. The digit next to the fourth significant figure is 4, which is less than 5, so the rounded number is 129.8.For 6 significant figures, we include all the digits given. The rounded number is 129.752416.For 7 significant figures, we include all the digits given. The rounded number is 129.752416.The following data were measured for the reaction BF3(g)+NH3(g)→F3BNH3(g): Experiment [BF3](M) [NH3](M) Initial Rate (M/s) 1 0.250 0.250 0.2130 2 0.250 0.125 0.1065 3 0.200 0.100 0.0682 4 0.350 0.100 0.1193 5 0.175 0.100 0.0596 Part A What is the rate law for the reaction? What is the rate law for the reaction? rate=k[BF3]2[NH3] rate=k[BF3][NH3] rate=k[BF3][NH3]2 rate=k[BF3]2[NH3]2
The rate law for the reaction BF3(g)+NH3(g)→F3BNH3(g) based on the input data is rate = k[BF3][NH3], where k is the rate constant, [BF3] and [NH3] denote the molar concentrations of BF3 and NH3, indicating a first order relationship for both reactants.
Explanation:In order to determine the rate law for the reaction BF3(g)+NH3(g)→F3BNH3(g), we have to look at how the initial rate changes with respect to the change in concentration of the reactants. Using the given data, we can compare experiments where only one reactant's concentration is changed while the concentration of the other reactant remains constant. Upon analysis, we see that when the concentration of BF3 doubles, the rate also doubles, suggesting a first order relationship. Similarly, when the concentration of NH3 doubles, the rate doubles, indicating a first order relationship for NH3 as well. Hence, given that both BF3 and NH3 are first order, the rate law for the reaction should be: rate = k[BF3][NH3].
Learn more about Rate Law here:https://brainly.com/question/35884538
#SPJ12
The rate law for the reaction BF3(g) + NH3(g) → F3BNH3(g) is rate = k[BF3][NH3].
Explanation:
The rate law for the reaction BF3(g) + NH3(g) → F3BNH3(g) can be determined by analyzing the effect of changing concentrations on the initial rate of the reaction. By comparing the rates of reaction for different experiments, we can observe how changing the concentrations of the reactants affects the rate. In this case, it is clear that the rate of reaction is directly proportional to the concentration of BF3 and NH3, so the rate law for the reaction is rate = k[BF3][NH3].
Learn more about Rate law for a reaction here:
https://brainly.com/question/14779101
#SPJ11
A city in Laguna generates 0.96 kg per capita per day of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW). Makati City in Metro Manila generates 1.9 kg per capita per day of MSW. If both cities have population of 20000 inhabitants, determine the following
i. amount of MSW generated in each city
ii. number of trucks needed to collect the MSW twice weekly, if each truck has a
capacity of 4.4 tons and operates 5 days per week. Two loads per day at 75%
capacity is the travel quota per day
iii. -the number and volume of MSW in tons that enter the landfill
Answer:
i) amount of MSW generated:
Laguna: 19200 Kg/day
Makati: 38000 Kg/day
ii) number of trucks to collect twice weekly:
Laguna: 3 trucks
Makati: 5 trucks
iii) volume of MSW in tons that enter landfill/week:
Laguna: 147.84 ton/week
Makati: 292 ton/week
Explanation:
i) Laguna: 0.96 Kg person / day of MSW * 20000 = 19200 Kg MSW / day
⇒ Laguna: 19200 Kg/day * ( 7day/ week ) = 134400 Kg/week
Makati: 1.9 Kg person / day of MSW * 20000 = 38000 Kg MSW / day
⇒ Makati: 38000 Kg/day * ( 7day/week ) = 266000 Kg/week
ii) truck capacity = 4.4 ton * ( Kg / 0.0011 ton ) = 4000 Kg
⇒ quote/day = 4000 Kg * 0.75 = 3000 Kg
⇒ loads/day = 2 * 3000 kg = 6000 Kg
⇒ operate/week = 5 * 6000 Kg = 30000 Kg
∴ Laguna: number of trucks needed/week= 134400 / 30000 = 4.48 ≅ 5 trucks
⇒ number of trucks to collect twice weekly = 5 / 2 = 2.5 ≅ 3 trucks
∴ Makati : number of trucks needed/week = 266000 / 30000 = 8.86 ≅ 9 trucks
⇒ number of trucks to collect twice weekly = 9 / 2 = 4.5 ≅ 5 trucks
iii) enter landfill/week:
Laguna: 134400Kg MSW/week * ( 0.0011 ton/Kg ) = 147.84 ton/week
Makati: 266000Kg MSW/week * ( 0.0011 ton/Kg ) = 292 ton/week
What changes are observed on heat capacity ratio and output temperatures by increasing the specific heat capacity of both the fluids?
a-The heat capacity ratio and output temperature both increases
b- The heat capacity ratio increases but output temperature don’t change
c- The output temperature increases but heat capacity ratio remains same
d- No heat capacity ratio nor output temperature changes
Answer:
b- The heat capacity ratio increases but output temperature don’t change
Explanation:
The heat capacity is the amount of energy required to raise the temperature of a body, by 1 degree. On the other hand, the specific heat capacity is the amount of heat required to raise the temperature of a of unit mass of a material by 1 degree.
Heat capacity is an extensive property meaning its value depends on the amount of material. Specific heat capacity is found by dividing heat capacity by the mass of the sample, thus making it independent of the amount (intensive property). So if the specific heat capacity increases and the mass of the sample remains the same, the heat capacity must increase too. Because of that options c and d that say that heat capacity reamins same are INCORRECT.
On the other hand, in which has to be with options a and b both say that the heat capacity increases which is correct, but about the output temperatures what happens is that if we increase the specific heat capacity of both fluids that are involved in a process of heat exchange in the same value, the value of the output temperatures do not change so only option a is CORRECT.
Draw an arrow-pushing mechanism for the elimination reaction between NaOH in ethanol and each of the following haloalkanes: (E1/E2)
(i) 1-bromobutane;
(ii) 2-bromo-2-methylpentane.
Answer:
The mechanisms for the elimination reactions between NaOH in ethanol and the halogenoalkanes are demonstrated in the figure attached.
Explanation:
(i) 1-bromobutane will suffer elimination to for an alkene. The mechanism will be E2, which means that the attack and the elimination will occur simultaneously. This is the preferred mechanism because the bromine is in a primary carbon.
(ii) 2-bromo-2-methylpentane will suffer elimination to for an alkene. The mechanism will be E1, which means that the attack and the elimination will occur in two different steps. The bromine will be eliminated in the first step with the formation of a carbocation and in a second step the double bond will be formed after the anionic attack. This is the preferred mechanism because the bromine is in a terciary carbon which is able to stabilize the carbocation formed.
You are given 12.33 moles of O2. How many moles of CO2 can be made?
Answer: The moles of carbon dioxide gas formed is 12.33 moles.
Explanation:
We are given:
Moles of oxygen gas = 12.33 moles
The chemical equation for the reaction of carbon and oxygen to produce carbon dioxide follows:
[tex]C+O_2\rightarrow CO_2[/tex]
By stoichiometry of the reaction;
1 mole of oxygen gas produces 1 mole of carbon dioxide gas.
So, 12.33 moles of oxygen gas will produce = [tex]\frac{1}{1}\times 12.33=12.33mol[/tex] of carbon dioxide gas.
Hence, the moles of carbon dioxide gas formed is 12.33 moles.
Nuclei with the same mass number but different atomic numbers are called isobars. Consider Ca-40, Ca-41, K-41 and Ar-41. (a) Which of these are isobars? Which are isotopes? (b) What do Ca-40 and Ca-41 have in common? (c) Correct the statement (if it is incorrect): Atoms of Ca-41, K-41, and Ar-41 have the same number of neutrons.
Answer:
Part a:
Isobars: Ca-41, K-41 and Ar-41
Part b:
Number of proton
Part c:
Incorrect statement
Explanation:
Part a:
Nuclei with same mass number are called isobars.
Given:
Ca-40, Ca-41, K-41 and Ar-41
Ca-41, K-41 and Ar-41 have equal mass numbers, so these are isobars.
Part b:
Atomic number of Ca = 20
Atomic no. = Number of proton.
So, Ca-40 ans C-41 have same number of proton or in other words proton count is common in both.
Part c:
Number of neutrons in Ca-41
Atomic number = 20
Mass number = 41
Number of neutron = Mass number -atomic number
= 41 -20 = 21
Number of neutrons in K-41
Atomic number = 19
Mass number = 41
Number of neutron = Mass number -atomic number
= 41 -19 = 22
Number of neutrons in Ar-41
Atomic number = 18
Mass number = 41
Number of neutron = Mass number -atomic number
= 41 -18 = 23
So, the statement is incorrect.
The isobars among the examples given are Ca-41, K-41, and Ar-41. Ca-40 and Ca-41 are isotopes of calcium with different neutron counts. The statement about Ca-41, K-41, and Ar-41 having the same number of neutrons is incorrect because they have different atomic numbers.
Explanation:Nuclei with the same mass number but different atomic numbers are known as isobars. This means that while they have the same mass number (sum of protons and neutrons), they belong to different elements (different atomic numbers). Consequently, Ca-41, K-41, and Ar-41 are isobars since they all have a mass number of 41 but belong to different elements with atomic numbers 20 (calcium), 19 (potassium), and 18 (argon), respectively. Nevertheless, Ca-40 is not an isobar to these because it has a different mass number.
Isotopes are atoms with the same atomic number but differing numbers of neutrons, resulting in different mass numbers. In this case, Ca-40 and Ca-41 are isotopes because they are both calcium atoms (same atomic number of 20) with different mass numbers.
The commonality between Ca-40 and Ca-41 is they are isotopes of calcium and thus share the same atomic number and chemical properties, despite having different mass numbers due to different neutron counts.
The statement 'Atoms of Ca-41, K-41, and Ar-41 have the same number of neutrons' is incorrect because while these isotopes have the same mass number, they have different numbers of protons. To calculate the number of neutrons in these isotopes, you subtract the atomic number from the mass number and because the atomic numbers are different, the resulting neutron numbers will also differ.
Part A In a particular experiment at 300 ∘C, [NO2] drops from 0.0138 to 0.00886 M in 374 s . The rate of disappearance of NO2 for this period is ________ M/s. In a particular experiment at 300 , drops from 0.0138 to 0.00886 in 374 . The rate of disappearance of for this period is ________ . −6.06×10−5 6.60×10−6 7.57×104 2.64×10−5 1.32×10−5
Final answer:
The rate of disappearance of NO2 in the experiment at 300 °C is approximately 1.32 × 10^-5 M/s, calculated by the change in concentration over time.
Explanation:
The rate of disappearance of NO2 in the experiment at 300 °C is calculated by determining the change in concentration over the change in time. The initial concentration of NO2 is 0.0138 M and it drops to 0.00886 M over 374 s. The change in concentration (Δ[NO2]) is 0.0138 M - 0.00886 M = 0.00494 M. The rate of disappearance is then Δ[NO2]/Δt = 0.00494 M/374 s.
After calculating this, we get the rate of disappearance of NO2 to be approximately 1.32 × 10-5 M/s, which is one of the possible choices provided in the question.
An interpretation of the results of many tests is called A) an experiment. B) a prediction D) a theory
Final answer:
An interpretation of the results of many tests is called a theory. It is a well-substantiated explanation of an aspect of the natural world, based on extensive research and experimentation.
Explanation:
An interpretation of the results of many tests is called a theory. A theory is a well-substantiated explanation of an aspect of the natural world. It is a scientific explanation that has been repeatedly tested and supported by many experiments.
For example, the theory of evolution is a well-supported explanation of how species have evolved over time. It is based on extensive research and experimentation.
It is important to note that a theory in science is different from the everyday use of the word, which often refers to a guess or speculation. In science, a theory is a well-tested and supported explanation.
In order to study hydrogen halide decomposition, a researcher fills an evacuated 1.11 L flask with 0.822 mol of HI gas and allows the reaction to proceed at 428°C: 2HI (g) ⇋ H2(g) + I2(g)
At equilibrium, the concentration of HI = 0.055 M. Calculate Kc. Enter to 4 decimal places.
HINT: Look at sample problem 17.6 in the 8th ed Silberberg book. Write a Kc expression. Find the initial concentration. Fill in the ICE chart. Put the E (equilibrium) values into the Kc expression.
Answer:
Kc = 168.0749
Explanation:
2HI(g) ↔ H2(g) + I2(g)initial mol: 0.822 0 0
equil. mol: 2(0.822 - x) x x
∴ [ HI ]eq = 0.055 mol/L = 2(0.822 - x) / (1.11 L )
⇒ 1.644 - 2x = 0.055 * 1.11
⇒ 1.644 = 2x + 0.06105
⇒ 2x = 1.583
⇒ x = 0.7915 mol equilibrium
⇒ [ H2 ] eq = 0.7915mol / 1.11L = 0.7130 M = [ I2 ] eq
⇒ Kc = ([ H2 ] * [ I2 ]) / [ HI ]²
⇒ Kc = ( 0.7130² ) / ( 0.055² )
⇒ Kc = 168.0749
The equilibrium constant (Kc) for the reaction where 2HI decomposes into H2 and I2 at a given temperature can be calculated using the ICE method. After setting up the Kc expression and solving for x, the concentration changes of HI, H2, and I2 can be used to find Kc, which is approximately 0.1176.
Explanation:To calculate the equilibrium constant (Kc) for the decomposition of hydrogen iodide (HI) into hydrogen gas (H₂) and iodine gas (I₂), we must first write the Kc expression for the reaction:
2HI (g) ⇌ H₂ (g) + I₂ (g)
The Kc expression is Kc = [H₂][I₂] / [HI]^2.
Next, we use an ICE (Initial, Change, Equilibrium) table to keep track of the concentrations throughout the reaction:
Initial: [HI] = 0.822 mol / 1.11 L = 0.7409 M (since the flask is evacuated, [H₂] and [I₂] initially are 0)Change: At equilibrium, [HI] has decreased by x to (0.7409 - 2x) M, since HI decomposes into one mole of H₂ and one mole of I₂ for every two moles of HI that decompose.Equilibrium: [HI] = 0.055 M, so 0.7409 - 2x = 0.055 M. [H₂] and [I₂] both increase by x to x M given the stoichiometry of the reaction.To calculate x, solve the equation 0.7409 - 2x = 0.055, yielding x = 0.34295 M. Now we know at equilibrium:
[HI] = 0.055 M[H₂] = x = 0.34295 M[I₂] = x = 0.34295 MInserting these values into the Kc expression we get:Kc = (0.34295)(0.34295) / (0.055)^2
Simplifying gives us:Kc = 0.1176 to 4 decimal places.
Know the general characteristics of the following; mixtures, solutions, compounds, molecules, and acids and bases.
Explanation:
A mixture is material which is composed up of two or more substances and these substances are physically combined. The identities of each specie in the mixture are retained.
A solution is a type of the homogeneous mixture which is composed of two or more substances. The specie which is dissolved into the another substance is known as solute and in which it is dissolved is known as a solvent.
A compound is the substance which is formed when two or more elements are bonded together chemically.
A molecules are electrically neutral and is a combination of of two or more atoms which are held together by means of chemical bonds.
Acids are the species which furnish hydrogen ions in the solution or is capable of forming bonds with electron pair species as they are electron deficient species.
Bases are the species which furnish hydroxide ions in the solution or is capable of forming bonds with electron deficient species as they are electron rich species.
Assume that aniline is insoluble in water. The normal boiling points of aniline and water are 184.1°C and 100°C respectively. At a pressure of I atm, the boiling point of a mixture of aniline and water is a) 184.1°C b) 100°C c) less than 100°C d) greater than 100°C but less than 184.1°C.
Answer:
At a pressure of I atm, the boiling point of a mixture of aniline and water is b) 100°C.
Explanation:
Assuming that aniline is insoluble in water there will be no interaction between liquids. There will be no positive interactions that can increase the boiling point or negative interactions that can decrease the boiling point. Thus the boiling points of each substance will not be affected. Since the boiling point of water is 100ºC, the mixture will start to evaporate at 100ºC.
Answer:
B.)
Explanation:
A fish company delivers 22 kg of salmon, 5.5 kg of crab and 3.48 kg of oysters to your seafood restaurant. What is the mass, in kilograms of the seafood? What is the total number of pounds?
Answer:
Mass of sea food = 30.98 Kg
Mass of sea food in pound = 68.31 lbs
Explanation:
Salmon, crab and oysters all are sea food.
Mass of sea food = Mass of salmon + Mass of crab + mass of oyster
Mass of salmon = 22 kg
Mass of crab = 5.5 kg
Mass of oysters = 3.48 kg
Mass of sea food = Mass of salmon + Mass of crab + mass of oyster
= 22 + 5.5 + 3.48
= 30.98 Kg
1 Kg = 2.205 lbs
Therefore, 30.98 kg = 30.98 × 2.205
= 68.31 lbs
Compared to the stable reference element, an isotope is different in what way?
Question 1 options:
A) More protons in the nucleus
B) Fever electrons in the orbitals
C) More electrons in the orbitals
D) Fewer neutrons in the nucleus
E) More neutrons in the nucleus
Answer:
E) More neutrons in the nucleus
Explanation:
Isotope -
The atoms which have same number of protons but different number of neutrons.
And since , atomic number = protons number
and , mass number = proton + neutrons .
Hence ,
The atomic number will not change , but the mass number will change .
Hence , the correct option is more neutrons in the nucleus .
The difference between the molar concentration and the molal concentration of any dilute aqueous solution is small. Why?
Answer:
Because for dilute and aqueous solutions the mass of solvent will be a very close value to the volume of solution.
Explanation:
Molar concentration is defined as:
[tex][M]=\frac{molessolute}{volumesolution}[/tex]
And molal concentration is defined as:
[tex][m]=\frac{molessolute}{kgsolvent}[/tex]
And:
Msolution=Msolute+Msolvent
For dilute solutions, we have small amounts of solute, then we have:
Msolution=Msolute+Msolvent, and as the mass of solute is very small: Msolution≅Msolvent
If the solution is also aqueous (water as solvent), and considering that the density of water is around 1 gm/cm3 or 1 kg/m3:
Msolvent≅Msolution≅Vsolution
Therefore, if we look to the molar and molal equations, we have the same numerator in both (moles of solute) and nearby numbers for the denominator, giving to the molar and molal concentration close values.
Calculate the molarity of a solution that contains 3.11 mol of NaNO3 dissolved in 2.50 L. Enter your answer in the provided box.
Answer:
Molarity of a solution that contains 3.11 mol of NaNO3 is 1,24 M
Explanation:
We understand molarity as the number of moles of solute that are contained in 1 L of solution, then if in a solution of 2.50 L we have 3.11 moles, it remains to calculate how many moles do we have in 1 liter.
2,50 L .......... 3,11 moles
1 L .................. x
X = ( 1 L x 3,11 moles) / 2,50 L = 1,24
Data: A H f values: CH 4( g), -74.8 kJ; CO 21 g), -393.5 kJ; H 20( 1), -285.8 kJ. Using the A H f data above, calculate A H xn for the reaction below. Reaction: CH 4( 9) + 20 2( 9) => CO 2(g) + 2H 2011) Selected Answer: d. -890.3 kJ Correct Answer: d. -890.3 kJ
Answer:
[tex]\Delta H_{rxn}[/tex] for the given reaction is -890.3 kJ
Explanation:
[tex]\Delta H_{rxn}=\sum n_{i}.\Delta H_{f}(product)_{i}-\sum n_{j}.\Delta H_{f}(reactant)_{j}[/tex]
where [tex]n_{i}[/tex] and [tex]n_{j}[/tex] represents number of moles of i-th product and j-th reactant in balanced reaction respectively.
Hence [tex]\Delta H_{rxn}=[1mol\times \Delta H_{f}(CO_{2})_{g}]+[2mol\times \Delta H_{f}(H_{2}O)_{l}]-[1mol\times \Delta H_{f}(CH_{4})_{g}]-[2mol\times \Delta H_{f}(O_{2})_{g}][/tex]
so, [tex]\Delta H_{rxn}=[1mol\times -393.5kJ/mol]+[2mol\times -285.8kJ/mol]-[1mol\times -74.8kJ/mol]+[2mol\times 0kJ/mol]=-890.3 kJ[/tex]
So, Correct answer is -890.3 kJ
How much magnesium sulfate heptahydrate is required to prepare 200 mL of 0.05 M solution? 10 g 2.46 g 0 0.05 g 12.38 24.65 g
Final answer:
To prepare a 0.05 M magnesium sulfate heptahydrate solution with a volume of 200 mL, you will need 2.46 grams of magnesium sulfate heptahydrate.
Explanation:
To calculate the amount of magnesium sulfate heptahydrate required to prepare 200 mL of 0.05 M solution, we need to use the formula:
moles = molarity x volume
First, we convert the volume from milliliters to liters:
200 mL x (1 L/1000 mL) = 0.2 L
Next, we substitute the given values into the formula:
moles = 0.05 mol/L x 0.2 L = 0.01 mol
Finally, we calculate the mass of magnesium sulfate heptahydrate using its molar mass:
moles = mass (g) / molar mass (g/mol)
0.01 mol = mass (g) / 246.48 g/mol
mass (g) = 0.01 mol x 246.48 g/mol = 2.46 g
Question 3. A batch chemical reactor achieves a reduction in
concentration of compound A from 100 mg/L to 5 mg/L in one hour. If
the reaction is known to follow zero-order kinetics, determine the
value of the rate constant with appropriate units. Repeat the
analysis if the reaction is known to follow first-order
kinetics.
Answer:
Rate constant for zero-order kinetics: 1, 58 [mg/L.s]
Rate constant for first-order kinetics: 0,05 [1/s]
Explanation:
The reaction order is the relationship between the concentration of species and the rate of the reaction. The rate law is as follows:
[tex]r = k [A]^{x} [B]^{y}[/tex]
where:
[A] is the concentration of species A, x is the order with respect to species A. [B] is the concentration of species B, y is the order with respect to species B k is the rate constantThe concentration time equation gives the concentration of reactants and products as a function of time. To obtain this equation we have to integrate de velocity law:
[tex]v(t) = -\frac{d[A]}{dt} = k [A]^{n}[/tex]
For the kinetics of zero-order, the rate is apparently independent of the reactant concentration.
Rate Law: rate = k
Concentration-time Equation: [A]=[A]o - kt
where
k: rate constant [M/s][A]: concentration in the time t [M][A]o: initial concentration [M]t: elapsed reaction time [s]For first-order kinetics, we have:
Rate Law: rate= k[A]
Concentration -Time Equation: ln[A]=ln[A]o - kt
where:
K: rate constant [1/s]ln[A]: natural logarithm of the concentration in the time t [M]ln[A]o: natural logarithm of the initial concentration [M]t: elapsed reaction time [s]To solve the problem, wee have the following data:
[A]o = 100 mg/L
[A] = 5 mg/L
t = 1 hour = 60 s
As we don't know the molar mass of the compound A, we can't convert the used concentration unit (mg/L) to molar concentration (M). So we'll solve the problem using mg/L as the concentration unit.
Zero-order kinetics
we use: [A]=[A]o - Kt
we replace the data: 5 = 100 - K (60)
we clear K: K = [100 - 5 ] (mg/L) /60 (s) = 1, 583 [mg/L.s]
First-order kinetics
we use: ln[A]=ln[A]o - Kt
we replace the data: ln(5) = ln(100) - K (60)
we clear K: K = [ln(100) - ln(5)] /60 (s) = 0,05 [1/s]
Write 41,405,000 in Engineering Notation with 3 significant figures.
Answer: [tex]41.4\times 10^{6}[/tex]
Explanation:
Significant figures : The figures in a number which express the value -the magnitude of a quantity to a specific degree of accuracy is known as significant digits.
Rules for significant figures:
Digits from 1 to 9 are always significant and have infinite number of significant figures.
All non-zero numbers are always significant.
All zero’s between integers are always significant.
All zero’s preceding the first integers are never significant.
All zero’s after the decimal point are always significant.
Engineering notation : It is the representation of expressing the numbers that are too big or too small and are represented in the decimal form times 10 raise to the power. It is similar to the scientific notation but in engineering notation, the powers of ten are always multiples of 3.
The engineering notation written in the form:
[tex]a\times 10^b[/tex]
where,
a = the number which is greater than 0 and less than 999
b = an integer multiple of 3
Now converting the given value of 41,405,000 into engineering notation, we get [tex]41.4\times 10^{6}[/tex]
Therefore the scientific notation with 3 significant figures is [tex]41.4\times 10^{6}[/tex]
Nitrogen oxide is a pollutant commonly found in
smokestackemissions. One way to remove it is to react it with
ammonia.
How many liters of ammonia are required to change 12.8L of
nitrogenoxide to nitrogen gas? Assume 100% yield and that all gases
aremeasured at the same temperature and pressure.
Answer:
You need 8,53 L of ammonia
Explanation:
Global reaction of remotion of nitrogen oxide with ammonia is:
4 NH₃ + 6 NO ⇒ 5 N₂ + 6 H₂O
This balanced equation shows that 4 NH₃ moles reacts with 6 NO moles.
With 100% yield and temperature and pressure constants it is possible to apply Avogadro's law. This law is an experimental gas law relating the volume of a gas to the amount of substance of gas present. The formula is:
[tex]\frac{V_{1} }{n_{1} } = \frac{V_{2} }{n_{2} }[/tex]
Where:
V₁ is the NO volume = 12,8L
n₁ are NO moles = 6
n₂ are NH₃ moles = 4
V₂ is NH₃ volume, the unknown.
Thus, V₂ are 8,53 L of ammonia
I hope it helps!
The measured cube has the following information: mass = 3.4800 g height = length - width = 1:00 cm • Determine volume of cube V- • Determine calculate density of cube. D-
Answer:
Volume of cube = [tex]L^3[/tex] = [tex]1 cm^3[/tex]
Density = [tex] \frac{m}{V} = 3.48 \frac{g}{cm^3}[/tex]
Charlotte is driving at 70.4 mi/h and receives a text message. She looks down at her phone and takes her eyes off the road for 4.54 5. How far has Charlotte traveled in feet during this time? distance:
The distance travelled by charlotte is 7269ft/mi.
Given:
Charlotte's speed = 70.4 mi/h.
Time she takes her eyes off the road = 4.54 seconds.
To calculate the distance Charlotte has traveled in feet while looking at her phone, it is important to convert her speed from miles per hour (mi/h) to feet per second (ft/s), and then use that speed to calculate the distance.
Convertion of speed to feet per second:
1 mile = 5280 feet
1 hour = 3600 seconds
Speed in ft = (70.4 (mi/h) × 5280(ft/mi)) / (3600(s/h))
Speed in ft = 103.25ft.
Calculation of distance:
Distance =Speed / Time
Distance = 103.25 * 70.4
Distance = 7269 ft/mi
Therefore, the distance travelled by charlotte is 7269ft/mi.
To know more about conversion of units, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/32030244
#SPJ12
Charlotte traveled approximately 469.761 feet while looking at her phone for 4.54 seconds by driving at a speed of 70.4 mi/h.
Explanation:Calculating Distance Traveled While DistractedCharlotte is driving at 70.4 mi/h. To find out how far she has traveled in feet while looking at her phone for 4.54 seconds, we need to convert the speed from miles per hour to feet per second and then multiply by the time in seconds.
First, we convert the speed from miles per hour to feet per second using the conversion factors 1 mile = 5280 feet and 1 hour = 3600 seconds:
70.4 mi/h × 5280 ft/mi × 1/3600 h/s = 103.46667 ft/s.
Now, we multiply the speed in feet per second by the time she is distracted:
103.46667 ft/s × 4.54 s = 469.761 ft.
Charlotte has therefore traveled approximately 469.761 feet while looking down at her phone for 4.54 second
Explain the principle of infrared spectroscopy.
Infrared spectroscopy is a technique used to identify functional groups in molecules by measuring absorption frequencies. It helps determine the presence or absence of specific groups in a molecule.
Explanation:Infrared spectroscopy is a technique used to identify different functional groups in molecules based on their characteristic absorption frequencies. It involves passing infrared light through a sample and measuring the frequencies that are absorbed. Different functional groups have different absorption frequencies, allowing scientists to determine the presence or absence of specific groups in a molecule. For example, if a sample absorbs in the carbonyl frequency range but not in the alkyne range, it can be inferred that the molecule contains a carbonyl group but not an alkyne.
If one mole of a substance has a mass of 56.0 g, what is the mass of 11 nanomoles of the substance? Express your answer in nanograms using the correct number of significant figures. Do not enter your answer using scientific notation.
The mass of 11 nanomoles of the substance is 616 nanograms.
Given that one mole of a substance has a mass of 56.0 g, we can calculate the mass of 11 nanomoles of the substance as follows:
1 mole = 56.0 g
1 nanomole = 56.0 g / 1,000,000,000
=[tex]5.60 * 10^{-8} g[/tex]
Now, to find the mass of 11 nanomoles:
Mass = [tex]11 nanomoles * 5.60 * 10^{-8}g/nanomole[/tex]
Calculating this gives us:
Mass =[tex]6.16 * 10^{-7} g[/tex]
To express the answer in nanograms, we need to convert grams to nanograms:
1 g = 1,000,000,000 ng
So, [tex]6.16 * 10^{-7} g = 6.16 * 10^2 ng = 616 ng[/tex]
Therefore, the mass of 11 nanomoles of the substance is 616 nanograms.
Learn more about moles, here:
https://brainly.com/question/34302357
#SPJ12
To find the mass of 11 nanomoles of a substance, multiply the number of nanomoles by the molar mass of the substance. In this case, the mass is 616.0 ng.
Explanation:To calculate the mass of 11 nanomoles of a substance, we need to know the molar mass of the substance. If one mole of the substance has a mass of 56.0 g, then the molar mass is 56.0 g/mol. To find the mass of 11 nanomoles, we can use the conversion factor:
11 nmol * 56.0 g/mol = 616.0 ng
Therefore, the mass of 11 nanomoles of the substance is 616.0 nanograms (ng).