The correct answer is C. It contains the opinion of a person who saw A Man's World. The writer gives his opinion that Rachel Crothers' play A Man's World "will not change conditions". This is the writers opinion and not a fact. It is also the opinion of person who went to see the play as he refers to the plays writer.
Answer:
Which statement best describes this excerpt?
It contains facts about whether or not A Man’s World will impact social norms.
It contains facts about how A Man’s World will impact viewers.
It contains the opinion of a person who saw A Man’s World.
It contains the opinion of the person who wrote A Man’s World.
thomas pain main idea
In the Odyssey, gods such as Jove, Minerva, and Neptune get involved in the mortals’ affairs. What do you think it would be like if gods really intervened in human affairs as they do in the Odyssey? Do you think life would change for the better or for the worse? Explain your stance and use examples from the Odyssey that support your response.
I think that the interference of gods in human life would be good if they use their experience to improve our existence, to stop certain things from happening, to help mortals.
This is what Athena tries to do for Oddyseus and his family. She disguises as a friend of Laertes, Odysseus' father. She then meets Telemachus and she advises him to meet with his mother's suitors.
Athena also connects him to kings Nestor and Menelaus so the prince can know his father, Odysseus, is actually alive.
Further evidence of positive interference is Zeus sending Hermes to convince Calypso to set Odysseus free.
On the contrary, when Poseidon, god of the sea, finds Odysseus escaping on a ship he causes a storm to sink it. He decides to do this because of revenge since Oddyseus had blinded his son on a previous adventure.
To summarize, I believe gods interference should be allowed only when it can be helpful when it can raise the quality of life.
Your answer should include the following points:
A discussion of what you think about gods getting involved in your daily activities.
Some instances where gods intervening in your life would really be helpful. For instance, it would be helpful if Neptune (the god of the sea) would contain the damage and destruction caused by floods, cyclones, and tornados.
Your thoughts on whether the gods’ involvement would always be beneficial and constructive. For example, Minerva’s constant support of Ulysses helps him stay alive on his journey and arrive home safely. Having supernatural support could be pretty great.
An explanation of why you believe the gods' involvement in human affairs would make life worse. For example, in the Odyssey, Neptune’s interference proved to be fatal for the Phaeacians. So if gods played favorites with humans, it could be disastrous for some people.
How can I finish this Report on my summer? Any tips/edits??
It is very well written. Try using grammerly to check any grammar errors. I would however include somthing else that you did beacuse all you focused was on school work, but honestly it is funny in a way that all you did was schoolwork. i liked it lol
Select the correct answers.
What are two tasks of a peer reviewer?
to memorize the whole poem
to recite the whole poem
to look for errors in the poem
to change the poem
to give feedback
Which plot event accounts for the change in Laertes's character in Act IV of Hamlet? the performance of The Murder of Gonzago the murder of Polonius by Hamlet the marriage of King Claudius and Queen Gertrude the appearance of the ghost
The correct answer is B: The murder of Polonius by Hamlet
This plot event accounts for the change in Laertes's character. At the beginning of the play, Laertes is a calm, gentle and docile person. However, after his father, Polonius, is murdered by Hamlet he returns to Denmark in order to avenge his father's murder. So, we can see that from Act I to Act IV Laertes's character changes dramatically as he becomes vengeful and he isn't a law-abiding citizen any more.
Answer:
the correct answer on e2020 is B the murder of Polonius by Hamlet
Explanation:
Pease help me ... ???
Left
This is from Mark Twain's Tom Sawyer. You need a sentence and a half to fulfill the conditions of what you are asked.
The sentence beginning "Injun Joe infested all his dreams ..." The his refers to Tom. Unfortunately, that does not include Huck, so you have to go another 1/2 sentence to get how Huck responded to Injun Joe (same way). Whoever made the question was a little bit sloppy in what they wanted. If it was just Tom, you could do it in one sentence. But to get both boys into the thought you need a 1/2 more sentence which begins
Poor Huck was in the same state of wretchedness and horror.
Middle
This is a case where you have notes, I would assume. The last one is certainly part of any persuasive argument. You have to know both sides in order to defend one successfully. So one of the answers is E.
That makes A incorrect. You have to choose one side of the topic, but you cannot be blind to the other side. You must somehow be able to mention and quickly counter the other side. That takes a lot of study.
Popularity has nothing to do with what to choose. The may want to take "the road less traveled." So B is incorrect. You have to go with what you believe, unless you are writing a speech for someone who has his own point of view.
C is pragmatic. You might do that if you have no feelings one way or the other about the topic. You have to look this up.
D has the same answer as C. It depends. If you are going to a Christian School abortion is going to be very hard to defend. Should you try? And you have to look at your notes that came with this question.
E is a definite yes.
Right
An infinitive is a verb form. It is usually a noun but not always. It is easily identified but can be a little harder to state what it does in the sentence.
Identification: There is only one sentence that has an infinitive in it and that is the fourth one down. "To win ... [her approval and trust]."
Function: It is not a noun. To win is not the same thing as goal. The verb used in the 4th one down is was which is a linking verb. If there is a noun used after it, then (in this case) it must be the same as goal.
It is not an adverb. To win would have to make was clearer which it does not. To win tells us nothing about the nature of was.
It is an adjective. The adjective modifies goal. The goal is a winning goal. The objective is to win the teacher's approval. The proper term for such an adjective is a predicate adjective.
PLZ help nOW!!
Which of the following is true about the CENTRAL IDEA in a text? A) It is always clearly stated by the author B) It is the same as the topic of the passage C) It is the same a the theme of the passage D) It can include specific details from the text
The correct answer is Option C. It is the same as the theme of the passage.
The central idea of a text is the author's aim to convey a message within its lines, and it always consists of the theme being discussed. Although often the author might not indicate the central idea explicitly, it can be carried out with clarity as the text goes on.
A theme is a very specific element taken from a subject, whereas a topic is a generalization of this subject. For example:
Topic: Books.
Theme: The Role of Books in a Student's Learning Process.
With this information, it is possible to tell the author means to describe how important books are for a student to learn new things as a central idea for their text.
PLEASE HELP ME ASAP !!!!!!!!!what is the meaning of Hypothesize and could you guys also help me figure out some question starting with this word. THANK YOU
Hypothesize is a is a hypothesis, which means a guess based off of limited evidence. A sentence starting with this could be "Hypothesize about this, the woman wasn't home at that time, so does that mean she could have committed the murder?" Or something along that line.
Hope I could help!
Which statement is a theme of "August Heat"?
Can u provide more detail.
in "civil peace" by chinua achebe What are explicit details? A. details that are presented indirectly by the author B. details that the narrator states directly in the text C. details the the reader must infer from information in the text D. details that are revealed only by examing the author’s background
Answer: The correct option is B:
Details that the narrator states directly in the text.
The author uses the third person to narrate the story, and gives specific details explicitly, explaining all the thoughts, feelings and actions that take place in the story directly. Explicit means that the reader does not have to infer or imagine the things that happen in the story because all actions are described in detail and they are certain, there are not mysteries about what must have happened because the narrator knows all the events and explains it fully in the story.
Momaday discusses the “irony” of the term “New World” (pars. 3–4). What are his reasons for this characterization?
Answer: N. Scott Momaday - who is a native American himself - finds ironic that white people claimed that they were arriving into the "new world" when in reality there were ancient civilizations already living on those lands, and this claim is one that they have continued to sustain up to this day.
When Europeans arrived in 1492, there were very large Indian populations scattered all across America with a rich history and culture, an element that vastly defers the logic of the discovery of a "new world".
Answer: Momaday characterizes the early inhabitants of North America as having “had some sense of society, of community, of cooperation and a human sense of morality, an irresistible craving for order, beauty, appropriate behavior” and as “intensely spiritual”.
Explanation: Support that characterization with examples and details from the Native American origin stories and trickster stories.
"What we need are laws to protect working people, to guarantee them fair pay, safe working conditions, protection against sickness and layoffs, and provision for dignified, comfortable retirement. Men and women need these things equally. That one sex needs protection more than the other is a male supremacist myth as ridiculous and unworthy of respect as the white supremacist myths that society is trying to cure itself of at this time." Why did Congresswoman Chisholm use the supremacist myth comparison in her argument? A. To show that everyone should be considered equal in the eyes of the law. B. To explain that women want the same privileges as men in the workplace. C. To shock people and make them realize that sexism is not as unacceptable as racism. D. To show that the fear white men have of equality for women is just as ridiculous as their fear of equality for blacks.
the correct answer is D
Congresswoman Chisholm used the supremacist myth comparison to emphasize equality for both genders.
**Congresswoman Chisholm** used the **supremacist myth comparison** in her argument to **highlight the absurdity** of believing that one gender needs protection more than the other, similar to how white supremacist myths are rejected in society today. She aimed to **emphasize** that **equality** in terms of rights and protections should be extended to **both men and women**. The comparison was made to challenge the **patriarchal norms** that perpetuate unequal treatment based on gender.
How can I rewrite it In my words?
Well you could give a summary in you own words like this :
"According to the Passage....."
That is one way! Or you Could fine the Main Idea to even Know what your Writing about. The most Important thing is that you Understand what the question is asking.
Identify the tense of the italicized verb in the sentence below.
The class graduates in June.
past
past perfect
present
present perfect
future
future perfect
Final answer:
The sentence 'The class graduates in June.' uses the simple future tense, indicated by the expectation of the action to happen in the future.
Explanation:
The sentence 'The class graduates in June.' is in the simple future tense. This is determined by the use of the modal 'will' implied before the verb 'graduates' to indicate an action that has not yet happened but is expected to happen in the future. In sentences where the future action is indicated by a time frame instead of the explicit use of 'will' or 'shall,' it still conforms to the simple future tense usage.
What is atmosphere in literature?
1 the attitude of a text toward the subject and theme
2 the emotional response a text generates from a reader
3 the author’s opinion of the subject and the audience
4 the narrator’s perspective in relation to the characters
The correct answer is Option 2, the emotional response a text generates from a reader, accurately defines atmosphere in literature. It highlights the impact the text has on the reader, evoking specific emotions and creating a particular mood.
Atmosphere in literature refers to the emotional response a text generates from a reader. It encompasses the overall mood, tone, and ambiance created within a literary work.
While the other options touch on different aspects of literary analysis, they do not fully capture the essence of atmosphere as the emotional or psychological response elicited in the reader. The attitude of a text toward the subject and theme (option 1), the author's opinion of the subject and the audience (option 3), and the narrator's perspective in relation to the characters (option 4) are important elements, but they do not encompass the broader concept of atmosphere.
In literature, atmosphere is crafted through various literary devices such as descriptive language, imagery, setting, and tone. It sets the overall mood and influences the reader's interpretation and experience of the text. By creating a specific atmosphere, authors can immerse readers in the world of the story, evoke emotions, and enhance the overall meaning and impact of the narrative.
Therefore, the correct answer is Option 2, the emotional response a text generates from a reader, accurately defines atmosphere in literature. It highlights the impact the text has on the reader, evoking specific emotions and creating a particular mood.
Learn more about atmosphere in literature here:
https://brainly.com/question/17915207
#SPJ2
Excerpt from A Baker's Dozen David Matherne "Had everything but the panting. And the drool. Too much caffeine I suppose. Too happy." If the author wanted to change this portion, which is the BEST way to combine these sentences? "Had everything but the panting. And the drool. Too much caffeine I suppose. Too happy." A) He had caffeine and happiness but no panting or drool. B) He had everything: panting, drool, caffeine and was happy. C) He had drooling but no panting. He had caffeine and happiness. D) He had everything but the panting and the drool; he also seemed overly happy, perhaps from too much caffeine.
The answer is option D: He had everything but the panting and the drool; he also seemed overly happy, perhaps from too much caffeine.
The excerpt from "A Baker's Dozen," by David Matherne, indicates that the person has no panting or drool, but has had a lot of caffeine and has a feeling of happiness. Option A mentions the same things in a simple sentence, but alternative D is expressed in a more improved way - with two independent clauses separated by a semicolon.
Option B is incorrect because it claims that the person has everything, and option C states that he or she has drooling, which is not true.
D) He had everything but the panting and the drool; he also seemed overly happy, perhaps from too much caffeine.
Which of the following is not presented as a key component to understanding a memoir
Answer:
what are the options
Explanation:
Answer:
The answer is D. Setting.
what is lamott's THESIS?
first drafts but you should write them anyway. She directly stated her thesis in her essay. Lamott supported her thesis with an example of her writing process when she was writing for the California magazine. She said she would write a first draft that may have been twice as long as it should have been the first day
Anne Lamott write the thesis are the based on the first draft was the sloppy, low quality of the work, she was the embraced her name.
What is Lamott's?
The Anne Lamott was the born on the August 1989. She was the writing of the novel. Anne Lamott was the American novelist and non-fiction writer, political activist and the public speaker. She was the well known written and the novel was the written are All New People, Imperfect Birds, Blue Shoe.
Anne Lamott write the thesis are the based on the first draft was the sloppy, low quality of the work, she was the embraced her name. Lamott says that the perceptions most people have of how writers work is different from the reality of the work itself. Anne Lamott thesis was the very famous.
As a result, the Anne Lamott was the low quality of the work.
Learn more about on Lamott's, here:
https://brainly.com/question/15261024
#SPJ2
A. Insert a letter. B. Capitalize a letter. C. Insert a space. D. Lowercase a letter.
The correct answer would be B. Capitalize a letter because that symbol with 3 lines underneath a letter means that we have to CAPITALIZE a letter.
Hope I helped.
Answer:
The correct answer is D: Lowercase a letter
Explanation:
The symbol (lc) is a symbol for lower case and if it was (cl) that would mean upper case so on and so forth, Pretty easy non complicated question. Hope this helps!
hellllllllllp again please
Which one these sentences has correct parallel structure
There are no sentences to chose from but an example of a sentence in parallel structure would be "The horse was large, bony, and friendly". Instead of "The horse was large, had a bony frame, and it was friendly."
where is the bold thamo being used in the sentence it was snowing heavily outside;nevertheless, decided to go for a walk
The answer is nevertheless.
CAN SOMEONE WRITE AN ANALYSIS FOR ME, ANY CHARACTER.
65 POINTS AND BRAINLIEST ANSWERS. 3-4 paragraphs plz.
Preferably fiction please! and hurry.
Use analysis in a sentence. noun. The definition of analysis is the process of breaking down a something into its parts to learn what they do and how they relate to one another. Examining blood in a lab to discover all of its components is an example of analysis.
If you still dont get it let me know so i can give you a 1 paragraph story about it or 2.
what is one of Edgar Allan Poe lasting legacies?
he established the horror genre as we know it (this is the answer if its multiple choice)
He paved the way for writing as a career. (Apex)
PLEASE HELP WILL GIVE BRAINLEST!!! 5 STARS AND THANKS
New Technology Leads to Bigger Cities In the 1800s, the United States was still a very young nation, trying to solidify its identity. The Industrial Revolution began in Great Britain, a fast development of society following the introduction of machines. The United States was slower than Great Britain to fully embrace the changes. Yet key technological developments caused a rapid growth in American urban areas. Better farming methods and tools in the 1800s increased food production. Americans were able to grow enough food for their families as well as to sell. The abundance caused food prices to fall. The expansion of cotton and the growth of textile factories in northern states helped produce the first wave of American industry. More people turned to work in northern factories as a way to support their families. Thousands of immigrants to the United States also settled in or near port cities, looking for work. Even today, the need for work is a common reason people move to urban areas. As a result, cities grew in numbers of people and physical space. As more people and businesses moved in, they needed buildings for living and working. They needed ways to move around the city. We call this process urbanization. In 1820, the United States had only a few cities of 10,000 residents or more. About seven percent of U.S. residents lived in urban areas. The number of cities with more than 10,000 people grew quickly over the next 40 years, especially in the Northeast and Midwest. By 1860, about 20 percent lived in cities. Philadelphia and New York City were the most populated cities in 1860 and would soon reach one million residents. The urbanization of the United States quickened due to technology improvements. Without innovations in food production, the factories could not have grown so quickly. The trend quickened after 1860 and continued throughout the 21st century as well. By 2007, more Americans lived in or near cities than they did in rural areas.
Select a sentence from the body of this article that can be removed without affecting the author's explanation. Place the sentence in quotes and explain why it is an unnecessary detail.
Answer: "Without innovations in food production, the factories could not have grown so quickly."
This sentence is placed in the text as an example of how urbanization increased thanks to technological improvements. However, no other part of the text discusses food production. Also, the author does not explain how it is that food production contributed to the development of factories. Because it is only loosely related to the topic and it adds so few details, it is a superfluous sentence. It is possible to remove it without significantly affecting the rest of the text.
What is the central idea of the Americanization of Irving Berlin
It could be said that the central idea of "The Americanization of Irving Berlin" might be that he was open , talented, he felt free and optimistic and he was creative.
question answered by
(jacemorris04)
In "The Americanization of Irving Berlin," the author reflects on the legacy of Berlin and on how his work impacted the United States. The main idea of the text is expressed in the first paragraph. The author's claim is that Berlin was the epitome of America's culture, because Berlin represented all the characteristics that make America a special place: "openness to striving and talent, its freedom, its inexhaustible optimism and creativity."
PLZ HELP ME NOW!!!!
and no paragraphs please
heh bet you wont do this one ya now lul
Imagine you are instructed to write a narrative constructed response related to this passage. The prompt below is provided to you. Which of the following responses would be the most appropriate to respond to the prompt?
Prompt: Consider the point of view and tone in "A Woman Who Went to Alaska" and construct a narrative that maintains the narrative qualities provided by May Kellogg Sullivan.
A) The narrative "A Woman Who Went to Alaska" is a very interesting piece about an independent woman who took on the adventure of traveling to a relatively unknown place on her own only two weeks after the railroad was opened for public transit. She demonstrates her adventurous spirit through her description of the other interesting women she finds herself traveling with both international and rich! The first-person point of view of the piece allows the reader insight into May Kellogg Sullivan's mindset as she embarked on a great journey.
B) The narrative qualities of May Kellogg Sullivan's piece include a first-person point of view and a descriptive introduction to her adventurous journey. She includes descriptions of how her father and brother arrived in Alaska to demonstrate how treacherous her journey was. Although she doesn't provide an outright description of herself, she includes descriptions of the many other interesting women who are on her boat and train thereby showing that she is also, quite fascinating. All of the narrative choices she includes help to build the reader's interest in what else her voyage might entail.
C) When I finally arrived in Alaska after my exhausting yet exhilarating voyage, I was immediately impressed by the vast landscape of mountains rising in the distance. Disembarking positioned me in a make-shift train depot near a small but bustling downtown Dawson that I had received many letters from my father and brother about. Each manuscript had described the greedy rush of men and women to profit from the gold found only a few years earlier in the area. Contrary to popular belief, and like so many of the other men and women who had uprooted themselves from their ordinary lives in other regions of the country, gold was not in abundance and mining for the treasure left many searchers empty-handed. My father and brother had not struck it rich with gold but were settling into a life of comfort since they had opened a small restaurant to serve the crowds of the growing town of Dawson.
D) I got off the train and went to look for my dad and brother. The town of Dawson was growing because there were so many new peeps looking for gold and to strike it rich. I had never been to Dawson before so I wasn't sure what direction to head in first. Even though the town wasn't very big, there were lots of people around. I decided to stop one of the first people I made eye-contact with and walked right up to him to ask about my pops. He said he had heard of the little food joint my kin had started up, and he pointed down the main street to the third building on the left. I gathered up my stuff and prepped myself for the surprise I was about to serve my dad and bro.
Eliminate
THE ANSWER IS A C and D don't make scene we r writing the passage not her and B isn't as interesting as A and beside i just took this quiz.Anyway anymore questions about the quiz i can help with
The most appropriate response to the prompt would be B) The narrative qualities of May Kellogg Sullivan's piece include a first-person point of view and a descriptive introduction to her adventurous journey.
Explanation:The most appropriate response to the prompt would be B) The narrative qualities of May Kellogg Sullivan's piece include a first-person point of view and a descriptive introduction to her adventurous journey. She includes descriptions of how her father and brother arrived in Alaska to demonstrate how treacherous her journey was. Although she doesn't provide an outright description of herself, she includes descriptions of the many other interesting women who are on her boat and train thereby showing that she is also, quite fascinating. All of the narrative choices she includes help to build the reader's interest in what else her voyage might entail.
If a body paragraph doesn't have enough specific details, A. it is too short and too weak to support the thesis statement. B. it can be mistaken for the introduction or conclusion. C. it is too difficult to revise.
change the color of font according to the uses of ethos, logos and pathos that you see.
Ethos in blue (there are 4 examples)
Logos in black (there are 3 examples)
Pathos in red (there are 4 examples)
Triple! - all three appeals - in green (just one example - found in the second half of the letter)
Arguing with Aristotle Email
The other night, we received this rather unexpected e-mail from our 14 year old son, reprinted here with his permission:
Subject: Sorry to send this to you in an e-mail…
I know re-registration for school is coming up, and I’m also aware how happy both you and Mommy are with me being there. The thing is, I have such amazing friends at the local public high school that (even though I may not show it all the time), I miss them so incredibly much, and I think about them every day wishing we had never split up. With such a perfect opportunity to continue our friendships together, it seems SO STUPID to me that we’re at different schools, when we could have all stayed together.
Every day that I’m sitting in class and I go off into a daydream, I think of all the fun we could be having together, all the times we’re missing, just so that I can be at a private school with a good reputation. The truth is, the local public high school offers just as good Honors classes, it just has a worse reputation because of some of the kids that go there. Sure I’ve made new friends here, but I’ve been hanging out with them every day when I could be hanging out with my best friends every single day.
I know you probably won’t believe me on this, but I decided to go here on a sort of an impulse, and because of the excitement of getting accepted in to such a well-spoken of school. I’ve been regretting that decision just about every day since the first day of school. I sort of feel like my friends’ and my relationships are splitting apart, just because of differences between schedules.
Also, don’t think that sending me to a private school is going to keep me out of drugs. I mean let’s be serious: high schools will have ample amounts of drugs no matter where I go, and I’m tired of all the racism, popularity contests, and disputes over who has more money. Apparently where I go to school it’s cool to do drugs, put down others for not doing so, and so on and so forth. I’ve already found out that there’s no such thing as a perfect school, and whether it be a private or public school is just based on which families have more money.
Now, don’t think I believe that none of this won’t happen anywhere else, because I’m not stupid. It just seems crazy for me not to go to a school with people I’ve known for so long, because these last four years are my last ones before we all split up for good.
I know there are grammatical errors in here, it might not flow very well, and I probably jumped around quite a lot, but I just want to say that this came from the heart, and I mean everything I said. Please just talk to each other about this. Sorry that I sent it in an e-mail rather than in person, but I just thought I could say what I wanted on here without being interrupted.
just go over this and read it sentence by sentence.
Identifying the uses of ethos, logos, and pathos in text, like a hypothetical email from a student discussing a school change, can illuminate the writer's strategies for persuasion. These rhetorical appeals, conceived by Aristotle, are essential tools in effective communication and argumentation.
The student's request to change font colors according to the uses of ethos, logos, and pathos, as well as instances where all three appeals are used together (triple appeal), provides a practical exercise in understanding Aristotle's rhetorical appeals. Ethos (trustworthiness or credibility) can be recognized in elements where the speaker establishes their sincerity or authority on the subject, logos (logical appeal) involves the use of factual data and logical reasoning, and pathos (emotional appeal) is identified in attempts to evoke an emotional response from the target audience. Knowing when and how these appeals are employed enhances critical reading and writing skills, offering insights into the strategies used by writers to persuade their audience.
For example, in a hypothetical email from a student wanting to change schools, one might find ethos exemplified in statements that demonstrate the student's understanding or personal connection to the subject, logos in references to specific benefits of the new school, and pathos in expressions of feelings about missing friends or the social atmosphere at the public school. A statement that combines all three appeals would perhaps discuss the student's rational decision-making process, their emotional desire to be with friends, and the credibility of their experiences with both schools.
Sofia is researching for a blog post about why people who want pets should adopt from pet shelters, and she finds a website called CaraLovesRescuePups.com. It’s run by a dog owner who writes about her experiences with the puppy she adopted from a local shelter. Is this a reliable site for Sofia’s research? no, because it contains a government domain-name suffix yes, because it contains a commercial domain-name suffix no, because it contains primarily personal opinions yes, because it’s written by someone who has a rescue pup
No it contains primarily personal opinions. I hope this helps
Answer:
no, because it contains primarily personal opinions
Explanation:
If Sofia is doing some research on the adoption of pets, she should resort to reliable sources. These are the ones which do not have personal opinions but information given by professionals such as veterinarians. Other useful sources can be the ones from local authorities or organizations in charge of taking care of abandoned pets in the community. These sources will provide reliable data about pet shelters.